Bombshell: Gingrich‘s Ex Accuses Him of Asking for ’Open Marriage’
- Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:25am by
Jonathon M. Seidl
- Print »
- Email »
Brian Ross, ABC’s chief investigative reporter, told WMAL-RADIO’s “Morning Majority” program that the bombshell news set to be released by Marianne Gingrich is that her ex-husband wanted an “open marriage.”
“He came to her and said, ‘I want to stay married to you and still have an affair with Calista, his current wife,” said Ross. “According to Marianne, he said ‘You need to share me,‘ and she said ’I don’t want to share,’ and the marriage ended,” he added.
ABC released an excerpt from the interview on Thursday morning:
Ross apparently scored the interview last Friday in Washington, D.C. after going back-and-forth about it since November.
Although he cautioned that some things ex-wives say should be taken with a “grain of salt,” that doesn’t make the news any less dramatic.
“She talked about how he called her and told her he loved her, knowing that Calista was next to him in bed in their apartment in Washington,” Ross said.
You can listen to the interview with Ross and WMAL below:
Read more at WMAL.
This is a breaking story. Updates will be added.
Popular Stories
MSNBC Host Snaps in Heated Segment: ‘What in the World Is Riskier Than Being a Poor Person in America?’ 694 Comments
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 662 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 525 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 364 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 362 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 235 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 247 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order Read More- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 147 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 235 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (991)
DudleyDoRight
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:43amWhether you like Newt or not, you have to realize this is a pattern of attack that the bho people us on enemies they are affraid of. see http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2011-11-09.html
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:02pmLook….we have to see this for what it really is. A distraction. Obama cannot run on his record and as long as jobs and the economy are weak and sluggish Obama‘s mouthpieces will do everything they can to smear and distract from Obama’s abysmal record. I don’t care how many wives Gingrich messed around on..I know his record in Congress and it’s a good one. His job performance is what I care about. Obama has a record now also…and it’s not a good one. So VOILA…bitter ex-wives to distract the American people from what’s truly important to us right now. Don’t fall for it, don’t buy it, keep Obama’s feet to the fire.
Report Post »cloudsofwar
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:29pmgood point dudley this story does fit Obama’s mo. as BO said you have to destroy your enemies.
Report Post »@leftfighter
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:34pmI don’t care about the pattern. Fact is, I have a principle. That is, if I’m unwilling to accept something a Democrat does on moral grounds, I‘m not going to accept it out of a Republican just because he’s a Republican.
That said, the Clinton Rule of Thumb is in play. “If his own wife can’t trust him, how the hell can I?”
If anyone can answer that question, I’d be willing to listen. Hit me up on Twitter.
Report Post »cloudsofwar
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:34pmBrian said they approached her last november and there was some back and forth since then. now the price is right what can i tell you and can you help me with the right words to say. JMO. something smells.
Report Post »SUMTHINSTINKS
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:35pmMarianne Gingrich is no innocent, and she was the one who broke the marriage and cleaned out the house………….http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/01/when-marianne-cleaned-out-the-house/
Report Post »I support God's Israel!
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:43pmRight. And what about Herman Cain and those who accused him of groping a woman in his car. I believe that was false, but the powers that be and you folks out there, hounded him, judged him, and tried to destroy him JUST ON SOMEONE ELSE’S SAY SO.
I have ALWAYS had a problem with Newt because ANY person, who can keep repeating the same moral mistakes, should not be trusted. Yes, his personal life has everything to do with his political life. WHAT HASN’T HE TOLD YOU? WHY DOES HE TAKE MORALITY WITH A GRAIN OF SALT? DO WE REALLY WANT SOMEONE IMMORAL AS PRESIDENT? This universe AND mankind IS and WAS based on moral principles, NO MATTER WHETHER YOU AGREE OR NOT. There is RIGHT AND WRONG, no matter whether you tag it as RELIGION or ATHEISM DOING THE RIGHT THING. RIGHT AND WRONG ***IS*** MORALITY – period.
Now, true, NO ONE IS PERFECT, but what I look at is THE PERSON’S RECORD, in his personal life and in his political life. Newt’s STAINS do not wash away that easily, just because he is running for President, yet you people seem to believe that BECAUSE he answers questions so eloquently and with SOME TRUTH, that he should be a viable GOP candidate. HOGWASH.
Personally, I do not like any of the candidates – PERIOD, but if I had to choose, it would have been Michelle Bachmann. Now, there is a BELIEVEABLE and MORAL candidate, WITH EXPERIENCE. But, NO, you all judged her because of her outspoken moral beliefs. You are all idiots and BLIND.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:46pmShe kept his last name…what does that tell you? Cash in? She’s just a bitter ex who wants to damage her ex-husband’s career. Everything about this interview stinks of timing and pre-meditated attack. Without transcripts of the divorce proceeding nothing she says can be taken at face value without corroboration. Don’t fall for the distraction..keep holding Obama’s feet to the fire. Keystone anyone?
Report Post »ROMNEY2012
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:48pm@leftfighter
You hit the nail on the head!
“I don’t care about the pattern. Fact is, I have a principle. That is, if I’m unwilling to accept something a Democrat does on moral grounds, I‘m not going to accept it out of a Republican just because he’s a Republican.”
I am amazed how many HYPOCRITICAL so-called ‘Conservatives’ out there who are willing to support this man.
Report Post »KickinBack
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:59pmIt worked on Cain, why not on Newt. Whether its the Dems or the Repubs who just want their man Mitt to get the nom, these kind of attacks are pathetic. And if everybody falls for this yet again, then we the people deserve 4 more years of Obama.
Report Post »ltb
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:03pmLet’s look at something here:
Perry rises in polls – media starts reporting about a rock with a racial slur on it somewhere on a 30,000 acre ranch where he hunted two decades ago.
Cain rises in polls – media starts reporting unfounded claims by anonymous women who said he sexually harassed them.
Santorum rises in polls – media starts reporting how Santorum spent time with his still born child before burying him.
Paul rises in polls – media starts reporting how a paper he was loosely associated with contained a supposedly racist article in it a couple of decades ago.
Gingrich rises in polls – media drags out his ex-wife to show what a horrible person he is.
See a pattern?
Let’s look at something else here:
Obama has an affair with Larry Sinclair, fellow drug addict – silence by the media.
Obama gets sweetheart real estate deal for his house in Chicago from convicted felon in exchange for political favors – silence by the media.
Obama starts political career in home of a domestic terrorist – silence by the media.
Obama spends 20 years in a “church” that preaches hatred of white people and the destruction of America – silence by the media.
See another pattern?
Report Post »I support God's Israel!
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:04pmAVENGERK:
What planet are you from and when do you plan on returning to it?
You claim that Newt’s ex-wife may be cashing in because she keep his last name, yet NEWT IS AN ADULTERER. Which is the greater sin? Choose wisely or better yet, get back into you spaceship and get out of my country.
Report Post »SgtB
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:05pm@ AvengerK, If you think that destroying the 2nd amendment, supporting cap and trade, and taking lobbying dollars from a pseudo-public company running on taxpayer dollars is a good record, then yeah, go ahead and vote for the Newt. Meanwhile, us sane and rational individuals will go ahead and vote for Ron Paul, whether or not he wins your “primaries”.
Report Post »WhiteFall
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:07pmNewt’s Lies, Adultery and Hypocrisy may be explained away by people like Perry and others who say nobody is perfect, but every time this issue comes up with Newt his automatic default position is to hide behind his grand children. It makes me sick that he abuses his relationship with these children to politically pivot the conversation and eyes of America on them and away from the issue. He instead should just flat out say he has extreme life long character flaws. Now he is sixty-eight years old and needs Viagra he continues to infer that his openness has simply put this life long habitual deceit behind him. Newt needs to keep his grand children out of the middle of his excusing his past.
Report Post »oldjackpinesavage
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:07pmLook for Axelrods finger prints here.
Report Post »What about FDR and Eisenhower? JFK didn t ask Jackie nor did William Jefferson Clinto ask Hillary. Come to think of it I don’t think LBJ asked Ladybird. History is repleate with men and women) who have had paramores while ruling a country or running a large business. As long as it doesn’t interfer with that administration i for one will not worry about. This not to say I condone this behavior indeed I condemn it but I also realize humans are weak. This is in reality old news and should br relegated to the dust bin of history. Hopefully Callista will be able to restrain Newt’s wilder ideas and statements As for Newt his two biggest assets are alo his two biggest liabilaties. The first is he gets ideas some are good some are terrible he needs to bounce his ideas off trusted aids be fore he articlates them. The second is is when he tries to explain an idea he needs to again run his explaination past some trusted aids first. He also needs to keep his temper in check
Polwatcher
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:22pmI am surprised that all the people who keep up on things didn’t already know that Newt left his former wife on very bad terms. It was a long time ago and I remember that Reagan also left his wife too. Jane Wyman was not happy with Reagan either. We all agree that divorces are hard on everyone involved but they are unfortunately a part of life for most people these days.
Bill Clinton raped a woman, used his power to force sex upon another woman, lied to a federal judge over it, and made a game out of getting a BJ from under his desk while in the Oval office. Does anyone get my drift?
Report Post »I support God's Israel!
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:24pmSGTB:
You were right until you got to the Ron Paul part. If you are NOT a Christian, then I can see your feelings toward Ron Paul. He has a lot of great principles EXCEPT ONE. He is not a Christian with the word of God in his heart, because if he were, he would KNOW that Israel IS God‘s chosen people and to not support Israel is to incur God’s wrath, which means that WE WILL BE A DOOMED NATION, WITHOUT GOD’S DIVINE PROVIDENCE, if Ron Paul gets elected as President. Need I say anything more??? OK. How about:
Genesis 12:3 says God promises Abraham: “‘I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you’” (NIV).
Why bless Israel? When God made the covenant with Abraham, He spoke the following, “I will bless those who bless you, And I will curse him who curses you; And in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.” – Genesis 12:3. God was not only referring to Abraham as an individual, He was also referring to Abraham’s descendants, which are the Jews. Therefore, we are commanded to not only bless the physical nation of Israel in the Middle East but to also bless all Jews throughout the world. When God made His promise to Abraham, He also made a promise to the entire world that He would bless anyone that blesses Israel.
So, go ahead and support someone WHO WILL NOT SUPPORT (BLESS) ISRAEL and you are ASKING FOR GOD’S JUDGEMENTS AGAINST THE REST OF US.
Report Post »cfinke3856
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:28pmHow many divorcees have amicable spouses? I would say not in this case. Divorces are horrible emotional events. The timing for this…… premeditated and maybe even some what vindictive. She does not seem to have moved on with her life after ten years. Is she jealous because her name is not on the Tiffanies account?
Report Post »OneCitizenOfTheRepublic
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:32pmI’ve seen a lot of comments here calling Newt an adulterer. And yes, by his own adminissions, he WAS an adulterer. He has also stated, (and proven I believe over the last number of years) that he has had a “coming to Jesus” moment since he conversion to his new faith.
Now, as Christians we are all supposed to believe in forgiveness and in the power of the Lord in someone’s life to change them…to wipe the slate clean. Either you believe this basic Christian article of faith, or you don’t But ask yourself if you are prepared to judge Newt with the assurance that you too will be judged, and you too will be evaluated upon what you did after you “repented” and chose to follow Christ.
Newt to me seems to be the new man that he claims to be. I may be wrong, but I have seen enough evidence to substantiate his claims, and will obey my Lord and forgive his past mistakes, which he has openly admitted. What you do is your own business…and you can take it up with God when your time comes as to whether or not forgiveness is only applicable to you personnally or if even a sinner like Newt can be forgiven and can change their ways, and find the Path to righteousness.
Report Post »BeHeardAmerica
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:36pmHey fits right into the Mormon religion
Report Post »Twinspeedr
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:43pmTwo words: Dirt Bag
Report Post »gjbare
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:57pmThis will not matter one bit for Newt. Only if you are a Christian and belong to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter day Saints will it matter. That is what we have to look forward to if Mitt Romney is selected as our Candidate for the GOP. I have already heard today that there is a church in south Carolina that will not vote for Mitt. Now that can’t be, unless they have been brain washed about the Mormon Church. Go Figure.
Report Post »sun-sense
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:00pmNewt did it for his country, amongst other things.
http://www.realchange.org/gingrich.htm
He talks well, but actions speak louder than words.
Report Post »Jack
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:02pmYes he’s been attacked twice for thing that happened A LONG TIME AGO!!! Maybe we should speak to some of Glenn’s old friends from his drinking days and see if they think he is a trustworthy source to get our information from based on how he behaved back then? Would Glenn take their word as well as he takes this wino looking lady’s word? The LDS church must be in a tizzy to try to get the first Mormon president elected that they have Glenn basically ruining his career for the cause.
WE ARE NOT BLIND!!!
You can‘t say you would vote for Santorum but basically soft soap Romney and slam anyone who get’s near him in the polls. You say your for the people “THE PEOPLE WANT GINGRICH” because we know what he’s done, while in office. Regardless what he says (while giving a speech) about former presidents. Give me an example of a socialist program he voted for? Not what girlfriend he had or whom he done a commercial with. Romney will be slammed in the General election similar to how Huckabee slammed him last primary.
Report Post »Demosthenes Locke
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:02pmIf Newt was “asking his wife’s permission”, he would have done it BEFORE he started getting it on with Callista. But he didn’t do that, he did it AFTERWARD.
They have a word for that in the ‘open marriage’ community: “Cheating”.
He didn’t ask her permission, he asked for her forgiveness. There’s a difference.
Report Post »qizzynob
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:02pmOh, seriously? Newt Gingrich is a pig…just see below:
Report Post »http://www.realchange.org/gingrich.htm
MoK
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:03pmI don‘t like Newt’s affairs, but I’m taking the long view. Obama needs to go. I think the left would LOVE if Romney was the Repub. candidate. They think B.O. can beat him. There is no perfect candidate, and the ones I liked have dropped out. This is what we have leftover, and we have to deal with it. For those having moral dilemmas over Newt, check out this article by Dennis Prager. It may give you some food for thought. http://www.dennisprager.com/columns.aspx?g=90a1ba2c-1d3e-4037-83da-6fbbfaa9b23d&url=what_does_adultery_tell_us_about_character
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:07pm@leftfighter – couldn’t agree with you more. Hypocrisy abounds!!
Report Post »Buck Shane
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:13pmThis story won’t effect me a bit. Newt is a big government progressive. He is a globalist. I won’t vote for him.
Report Post »But, my question to you is, “If his wife can’t trust him, how can you?”
Viet Vet
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:14pmI wanted that too, but wife said no.
Report Post »Faith1029
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:16pmI don’t care what this woman says, it is in the past and the fact Newt has asked forgiveness of his past from his Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, is good enough for me. If Christ forgave him, who are we to hold his transgressions against him? I certainly am glad Jesus doesn’t hold grudges the way some people do. If He did, we’d all be in trouble. Psalm 103:12 As far as the east is from the west, so far has he removed our transgressions from us.
TO ALL THE STONE THROWERS: John 8:7 LET HE WHO IS WITHOUT SIN CAST THE FIRST STONE.
Report Post »queenslaby
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:27pmto avengerk… you are so correct! enough of the smut already… let’s stick with the real issues at hand!
Report Post »nmgene
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:33pmNewt made mistakes in his past and has owned up to them. He has been married this time for many years. He has been very honest about it. No one else now still running has the ability to take on the corrupt obumer regime. Look at what Newt has been doing the last few years, look at his dvds on the forming of this country. Yes he is outside the box and that is exactly what we need. The establishment repub rinos are scared to death of him as are the Damocrats. He can and will fix our country.
Report Post »little big man
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:35pmI could care less if Newt had sex with farm animals. he’s very smart may be a little progressive, not as bad as bush. is country very well and get us back on track.
So to me this is a none story, and should just piss off the american people even more just to see the diff how the liberal media vetted obama which they didn’t vs conservative?republicans.
I’d vote for my GDamn shoe if it ran Vs obama.
Report Post »dlz
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:41pmThere is not one candidate that is perfect. We all make mistakes. However, we have a loving God who forgives us when we repent. Newt has admitted his mistakes, has repented and asked for forgiveness. If God can forgive Newt and forgive all of us for our mistakes then I think we need to put aside all the slander and negativity and vote for the strongest person to beat Obama. There is no other candidate that can debate and knows the histroy better than Newt. He is our best hope against Obama. Let us save our country and elect Newt.
Report Post »PapaPolitte
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:44pmNo human being if pefect, we are all sinners. If ones past were to come to light for all of the folks in this country, a whole lot of them would be shocked. What Newt did is over and done with, between him and God. And for the man who stands on principal, GOD FORGIVES!
Report Post »TPartyXpress
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:46pm@ROMNEY2012
Yeah, check out that name. You just proved you are another lying POS with an agenda. Patriots have an agenda too – destroy lying MF’s like Romney and Obama. Go crawl back into your sewer.
Report Post »RabidPatriot
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:50pmThere are plenty of legitimate reasons not to nominate Newt without having to rely on the venom of an ex-wife.
Report Post »Lucky1
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:51pmThis is old news…The media should check back when the divorce happened. It was in the inquirer magizine and all the soap opra papers by check out counters everywhere…Check it out.
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:58pmNewt is simply not trustworthy, and this just stacks on top of what we already knew about him.
He articulates conservative principles well, but that doesn’t mean he believes what he is saying. He “flip-flopped” on the person who trusted him most, twice.
A lot of people are saying things like “let he who is without sin cast the first stone,” but this isn’t just about sin. This is about character and integrity.
You don’t have to go into his personal life, however, to see his character; as Speaker, he was charged with 84 counts of ethics violations. He is one of just 36 Congressmen in history to be censured. He ended up resigning in shame, after losing 5 seats in the 1998 midterms.
Now, how would Newt govern as president? The best way to know this is to know which presidents he looks up to: FDR and Woodrow Wilson. Go look them up and see what you’ll be getting when you vote for Newt.
Report Post »Buck Shane
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:14pm@ Romney2012
Report Post »Romneycare!
Romney is the only candidate worse that Newt.
Buck Shane
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:17pm@ FreedomPurveyor
Report Post »Good Post.
AvengerK
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:21pmThat’s it “I SUPPORT”….you concentrate on sins that’s just what Barry wants you to do in this case. The most important thing for this country right now is to throw Obama out of office. I don’t care about bitter ex-wives with revenge fantasies. Furthermore, Gingrich is a converted Catholic of many years and has what appears to be a solid relationship with his current wife, children and grandchildren. So much so that his daughters have stepped up to his defense. So who do I accept..the bitter ex wife with an axe to grind or his current family? You’re harping on exactly what Obama wants you to harp on. Congratulations, he’s distracted you from the real goal..Obama’s expulsion from office.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:23pmFREEDOMPURVEYOR….your “good cop/bad cop” routine isn’t very convincnig. Gingrich has been exonerated on those violations. Keep trying champ.
Report Post »bobemakk
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:23pmI agree and I support Gingrich wholeheartedly.
Gingrich for president. The lamestream media is trashing Newt for “historical” baggage. All politicians have baggage if we dig deep enough, but the lamestream/left socialists won’t expose democrats, they love the big zero/Obama. Newt has made his mark with his “Contract with America,” a contract he fulfilled that no other politician can match. He is a true conservative, and gaining in the polls. He also now has the support of the Palin family and Rick Perry. We need this man to bring back our country into prosperity. However, I will vote for anyone who runs against the Obama regime.
AND Brian Williams, you are a trashy lamestream media journalist. Why can’t you see what Obama has done and is doing to our country? Why do you support a man who shows no experience and is bankrupting our country with his social justice policy, bailouts and lies that he hides behind.
He produced a fake birth certificate, he has refused to show his college records and none of his college friends remember him. Remember the anti-Christ has no records, and neither does Obama. Is this a striking resemblance or what? Tell your lamestream slimy journalists to stop the trashing of every republican starting with Newt Gingrich. They actually get off on doing this and it is upsetting to most intelligent Americans who know that Newt Gingrich has changed dramatically.
Report Post »Jackers
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:27pmNewt’s “not getting involved”? The problem is he IS involved! Kind of reminds me of when Anthony Weiner no longer wanted to discuss his predicament… “I have nothing more to say. I’ve got to get back to my office”…
Newt Gingrich is ethnically challenged to say the least and quite the philanderer… From wife number one to wife number two to wife number three… Worse, an “open” marriage? What does this say about the man’s character? Then to go after President Bill Clinton for cheating on his wife while cheating on his own? A dishonest hypocrite too!
How on earth can we trust a man like this? If Newt could live a lie with his second wife for six years, what else is he capable of lying about?
This man is not to be trusted; but personal faults aside, this man is still an open-border globalist and speaks with a forked tongue… Newt would not be good for America.
Report Post »HippoNips
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:28pm@leftfighter
Report Post »Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:34pm
I don’t care about the pattern. Fact is, I have a principle. That is, if I’m unwilling to accept something a Democrat does on moral grounds, I‘m not going to accept it out of a Republican just because he’s a Republican.
—————————————————————————————————–
You mean like passing a moral judgement upoon hearing one statement from a disgrunted exwife form 15 years ago??
YOU are the problem,
Newt’s past marriage is not even YOUR concern , You are not “moral” , You are a prickk that is easily manupulated,
HippoNips
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:33pmNone of this “bombshell” is even new, Marianne, the seducing Mistress who became his first wife, has yapped about all this before ,
Reagan was divorce and had a Hollywood divorce of all things
No one cared then , and we do not care now
Report Post »HippoNips
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:35pmGlenn Beck and The Blaze has turned into go to places for crazy mormons, ron paul nuts and homos
Beck went totally nuts after he got more into Mormonism, and then got thrown off Foxnews for his crazy behaviours
Report Post »Buck Shane
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:35pm@ AvengerK
“Congratulations, he’s distracted you from the real goal..Obama’s expulsion from office.”
I don’t understand. Are you saying we should compromise our principals and vote for someone who has none?
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:36pmBy the way I SUPPORT GOD’S ISRAEL…Gingrich has converted to Catholicism and taken communion. The church is absolving his sins before God. Wasn’t Magdeline an adultress who asked for forgiveness also? By your measure you’d still be stoning her..contrary to Christ’s word. Spare us your pious “what planet are you froms”.
Report Post »Ookspay
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:37pmI listened to Glenn again today rip on Newt for his past sins and bad judgement. It is hypocritical coming from a man who has admitted to snorting blow of h@@kers, cheating on a spouse and once firing an employee for bringing him the wrong pen! Glenn talks about the power of redemption and forgiveness when one repents and finds The Lord, but apparently doesn’t believe it is possible for anyone but himself. Perhaps true redemption can only come via the golden plates…
I for one am willing to accept Newt at face value when he says that he is a changed man. He still has a brilliant mind and the know how to make some serious conservative changes in Washington DC.
The media however will beat this thing to death and this could become an electability issue in the General election. There will be women coming forward ala Herman Cain, drip, drip, drip. Even though the media gave Clinton a pass for worse in ‘92, they will excoriate Gingrich.
As it was in the beginning, in the end it will probably Mitt. I am cool with that, but we will have to really keep him honest and hold him to conservative principles. Sending a few more TEA Party members to DC to keep an eye on him won’t hurt either.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:50pmNo BUCK SHANE..I‘m saying don’t take the lefty bait. Gingrich is a converted catholic and has taken communion. Under church doctrine he’s been forgiven his sins before God. His family has rallied around him. Redemption and forgiveness are lost on you? If he‘s a filanderer today he’s hiding it very well. Bitter exes with an axe to grind aren’t unique by the way. You think it’s a coincidence that democrat lap dog network ABC is airing this intervew now? Pundits have predicted this will be one of the dirtiest campaigns in living memory because Obama has an abysmal record and can do not much more than smear, distract and lie. Lo and Behold…a bitter ex of a GOP candidate with an axe to grind shows up right before an important primary, fancy that huh? Is all this a consideration for you or are you going to stick with “bad Newt for shame”? The most important thing in this nation’s future right now is to expell Barack Obama from office. If he wins, America loses, make no mistake. The lap dog media won‘t report Obama’s dirty past and will shield him as much as they can, we know that much.
Report Post »Constantine Ivanov
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:50pmTo @LEFTFIGHTER:
Dear strong-principles-bearer, as you might know (despite the terrible educational system), many dreadful dictators were exemplary husbands. Hitler was one of such individuals. The obama seems to be an another one.
If you dive in history even deeper, you’ll find that many terrible husbands were exemplary leaders. (For the brevity sake, I let you fill up the list by yourself.)
The real problem for such “purists” as you seem to want to present yourself is that you can’t apprehend that the sexual (both matrimonial and extra-matrimonial) relations are ABSOLUTELY NOT NECESSARILY reflect the civic and political merits simply because these are phenomena of DIFFERENT NATURE.
The civic and political merits are rooted in public spirit of an individual, his/her ideology; sexual habits are rooted in biology.
And these two realms are far from always are bound together.
But I am afraid that, even though you proclaim that you are a Conservative, with your narrow mindset you’ll actually vote for the 2nd term of the most disastrous president of this country.
Yes, using those female skeletons to destroy a Republican candidate is a tool the obama administration love to use and watch how Conservatives are being entrapped.
Report Post »schlitten15
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 6:23pmI don’t care what Newt did 20 years or so ago. He is the man we need to beat Obama. I like to know how many of our holier than thou Politicians have skeletons in their closets. Newt is smart and very well spoken and he balanced the budget when he was the Speaker of the House. He gets my vote.
Report Post »ROMNEY2012
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:02pmTPartyXpress
It’s DUMBA$$ like you that are the problem.
YOUR BLIND HATRED Of MITT ROMNEY is leading you to vote for the candidate with THE LEAST INTEGRITY, HONOR, and CREDIBILITY.
If GINGRICH is the POSTER CHILD of the TEA PARTY we might as well start calling it the FIESTA OF IDIOTS.
Report Post »Grey Eagle
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:14pmNewt is known warts and all. GOP voters already know what we will be getting: Not Romney.
Report Post »ROMNEY2012
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:28pmGrey Eagle
You are obviously filled with BLIND HATRED for MITT ROMNEY.
This EMOTIONAL ANIMOSITY toward a man who is PROVEN LEADER with a TRACK RECORD of SUCCESS in EVERYTHING he has done, proves that the TEA PARTY is filled with a bunch of MORALLY BANKRUPT fools.
ARE you an ANTI-MORMON BIGOT or just an ANTI-CAPITALIST CONSERVATIVE?
Report Post »Tower7_TRUTH
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:31pmI don’t care about his sex life as long as the precipitants are over 18
I don’t like Newt World Order Gingrich because of his Globalist and Climate change views
and his support of the Patriot act and FEMA camps
Report Post »Cherieo3
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:31pmExactly….here they go now on Newt. Obama and gang are afraid of him…so they finished off all other contenders…sarah Palin, Michelle Bachman, Cain, and anyone who they feel is a ‘threat’…and probably paid these ex-wives $$$$$$ to do this stunt!!! I’m glad to see Newt just stay above the fray..and let his daughters do the interview.
Report Post »Puddle Duck
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:51pmThis has Axlerod and his rotten apple team’s prints all over it. Avengerk has a valid point with the various candidates rising up only to be taken out by some amateur hour smear campaign shortly thereafter. The really sad I thing all to frequently on this board is this…if Newts character flaws cannot be cgancged then why is he still married to Callista ? This all ahppened over 20 years ago, he paid a heavy price for his sins/transgressions and is now actively seeing his redemption through by doing something possitive with his life. A second chance folks…I think Newt deserves some praise for turning what used to be a bad person and and life around 180 degrees….GB did the very same thing and yet I do not hear anything about GB being tarred with the same brush Newt is being hammered with. I think it has more to do with pllitics than facts….some of us here are using this oppirtunity (just like the other ops were exploited) to whittle BHO’s oppinents down to the least effective GOP candidate possible (in terms of conviction to turn around the BHO legacy). Think about redemption and what it means to forgive and stop being so high and mighty. Every man/woman who truly turns his/her life around deserves a second chance.
Report Post »catfantastic
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:52pmI agree with you, and I like Ann Coulter and I too believe that Herman Cain was under attack from Axelrod and whoever else is in their dirty little Chicagoan Marxist Maffia.
I don’t care about what mistakes Newt did when he was younger, we have all made mistakes, some that we regret but if we don’t learn from our mistakes, there is something wrong. We learn and become better people, and for those out there that think you can walk on water, you better take another look at yourself. WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND….. Take a look in the mirror, you might be surprised. Judge not lest ye be judged!!!
However, in my personal opinion, Obama, all his Cronies, including all the Socialist Democrats, Marxist, Statists, TYRANNY IS STILL TYRANNY NO MATTER HOW YOU SPELL IT!!! And what about Larry Sinclair?????
Report Post »KTsayz
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:53pmAre people here really that dense and don’t know how to vet?
Newk is CINO – Catholic in Name Only! He has flip flopped his position on when life begins!
On Dec 2, 2011, Newk said that life begins at successful implantation!
Tapper: When do you think human life begins?
Newk: Implantation and successful implantion.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/12/gingrich-breaks-from-some-in-anti-abortion-community-on-when-life-begins/
3 days later, on Dec 5th, when he saw that that stance hurt his chances of a win, he flip-flopped and LIED about flip-flopping!
Newk: “As I have stated many times throughout the course of my public life, I believe that life begins at conception.”
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/197179-gingrich-reverses-position-that-life-begins-at-implantation
This guy is a serial LIAR! He says one thing for political expediency but believes the total opposite. His voting record if proof positive that he is a CFR globalist who wants to do away with AMerica’s border and get the North American Union up and running. That is what NAFTA is all about AND his ideas on amnesty.
Even Palin has fallen for this globalist pig telling me she has stepped in the slime too much and is now muddied.
There is only one person I will give my vote to. I am voting for Liberty, economic sovereignty and our Constitution. He is the only candidate who could and would beat Obeyme. And that is why he has been blacked out and disrespected by the LSM.
Report Post »kifeb221993
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:14pmhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVcZQdN4_1w&feature=related
Report Post »Puddle Duck
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:46pmMy God I wish Obama got 1/10th the vetting the GOP routinely see… read the link in the first post folks…it spells out just how rotten the DNC and the Chicago machine has become. It seems to me Chicago style politics has been adopted as Fed DNC strategy and yet folks are outraged by Gingrich for something he did 20 years ago ? How about what Obama and Axlerod have done from 2004- present ? Obama’s entire plitical career has been a sham and criminal farce. I suggest anyone wanting to know just how bad this bunch are read Michelle Malkin’s book “Culture or Corruption”…you will be flabbergasted by it…making what Newt did seem like a choir boy prank in comaprison (although I do not see it as such in real terms, he made a huge mistake but he has paid for it IMHO and will pay for it for the rest of his life). I can give him a second chance.
Report Post »But to give Obama and crew a complete pass considering just how sordid his past has been is downright , well , criminal IMHO. We should be tearing BHO and his handlers apart folks (with facts and his putrid track record). As Levin says I’d vote for a glass of orange huice ahead of Obama…..keep the big picture in perspective and forget the infighting…it serves no ones purpose other than the DNC and Axlerod’s re-elect Dumbo team by tying us up in knots and portraying us as incapable of leading (sinbce we can;t even agree on who should do what to whom). The left are playing us like cheap violins. Wake Up.
Buck Shane
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:02pm@ AvengerK
Report Post »“I‘m saying don’t take the lefty bait.”
I don’t understand.
My position is simple. I don’t care what his ex-wife says. I don‘t care what other candidates say against him’ He is a big government progressive. He is a globalist. I will not vote for him.
If he is the Republican candidate, I must not be a Republican.
If the Republicans want my vote, run a Reagan like candidate.
I will not sell out my principles – why are the Republicans? Or, maybe they have none.
I would hate it if we ran a McCain, Dole type candidate. If they do and lose, I will blame what Obama does to America on them. Run a Republican who really is a Republican, and win.
Buck Shane
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:34pm@ ROMNEY2012
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:28pm
Grey Eagle
“You are obviously filled with BLIND HATRED for MITT ROMNEY.”
Me Too
Report Post »Romneycare
Romneycare
Romneycare
charles116
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 2:44amSeriously,
Report Post »you get your info from Anus Coulter AND
take it seriously?
Ruler4You
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 5:17amThe communists had no problem with B.J.Clinton’s open marriage. Or J.F.K.’s infidelity. As a matter of fact, they sort of revere it or celebrate it. But Newt’s is a problem? In what way?
Report Post »gizmotlt
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 8:25amYou can never believe an ex-wife. My brother in law’s ex has repeatedly said horrible things about him but everyone that knows him knows the truth. She treated him horribly. He worked all of the time to support her and she never cleaned or cooked and cussed him every day. He has finally found someone to treat him nice like he deserves. The way I understand it was that Newt had an affair with the second wife while was married to the first. She knew he was married and didn’t care. I do not feel sorry for someone that does that. But most of all, we have all made mistakes and asked God for forgiveness and he does. So who are we to judge anyone else. The main thing is Newt will be able to start turning this country back around on the first day because he is experienced and the smartest man running.
Report Post »Aviyah
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 1:15pmDoes the interview change the way I feel about Newt?
Yes it does. It makes me want to vote for Newt although I wasn’t inclined to, to begin with. I want Newt to rip Obummer and all his brown noser pals in the media a new one! I actually prefer Santorum but who else besides Newt Gingrich is going to give the media the HELL they deserve?
We cannot take four more years of the media’s negativity towards whomever we elect. If we elected Jesus Himself the media would tear him down to the ground for the next 4-8 years. Newt will go toe to toe with them. He will not stand there and take it without defending himself as George W. Bush did. I think we need Newt as either President or Vice President if for no other reason than to stand up to this out of control schutzstaffel.
Report Post »bodysouls
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 5:12pmThe truth is you know that there have already been open marriages in the White House. Just look back to Kennedy and forward to William Jefferson Clinton!
Report Post »Beardancer
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:44pmTo “I Support God’s Israel.” Good word about Israel. However, Bad word on Newt. The God of Israel is a forgiving God through Y’shuah. So if God has forgiven Newt, why can’t you? Are you better than God? Read Romans 2:1-5. You say Judge Paul also by saying he hasn‘t got God’s word in his heart. Maybe, maybe not but who made you anyone’s judge?
The facts are that Newt’s own daughters by his ex, support him and this was done in vengeance. The woman needs to get counseling to overcome the wound and learn to forgive. Doesn‘t mean she has to forget but forgiveness doesn’t slander or take vengeance. She needs healing. Newt needs or needed it, sought it and got it through God. End of story. Period.
Report Post »MS-GlenNBC
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:42amGlenn Beck has become
ROMNEY SUPER PAC
it is 1:40 minutes into his show and he has talked AGAINST Newt the whole time.
What ever happened to being for something…
Maybe you should focus on Positive Rick Santorum information for 1:40 minutes. ” Your Words Glenn- Pat- and Stu-pid”
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:49amNo wonder Grinch and Romney don’t get along, they’re too much alike!
Mormons like multiple wives, and so does GrinchGrinch.
It’s all coming together, Beck. None of them like minorities, especially the dark complexioned ones.
hillbillyinny
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:50amGlenn said weeks ago and has reconfirmed it several times since then that he IS NOT endorsing any candidate, but that personally he would vote for Rick Santorum. What don’t you understand?!
Are you the called Glenn threw off the phone this AM?
Report Post »floridacockleburr
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:53amWell said.
Report Post »mikem1969
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:55amThe key word is EX-WIFE. Women are very vindictive about hurting their exes in any way they can especially when their exes are successful. I would not listen to a word the woman says. Remember the lies the libs and progressives had told about Cain, they are at it again.
DirtyDeeds
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:56amI think he was the caller. Glenn needs your address so he can mail you a check, for the books he is buying back from you.
Report Post »memphislawyer
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:59amYou’re right. Glenn‘s self righteous attitude comes out everytime things aren’t going his way. (He favors a whiney ‘statist’ like Santorum) Although I have agreed to much of what Glenn has done in the past, he is now using tactics of politicians: taking things our of context to pursue his agenda. Why do we have to believe everything a scorned wife says who has carried her bitterness over so many, many years; Glenn acts like he does. Glenn’s time in the limelight is growing shorter which is why I think his attitude reflects his own desparation.
Report Post »ChiefGeorge
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:59amDon’t trust Newt! We will definitely lose this election if he is picked as the nominee. Why got with baggage when you’ve got another with almost zero baggage.
Report Post »COFemale
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:00amApparently you do not comprehend anything Glenn says; he has never endorsed Romney. Just because Romney is Mormon does not automatically mean Glenn supports him. Go back to MSNBC where the crap you say is understood by your lack luster wannabe’s.
Obviously, you don’t watch Glenn and make comments pulled out from your ___________.
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:05amWhat I find absolutely curious is that I now know the absolute inner, most private details of pretty much every Republican candidates’ sorid sexual and personal life, yet for some reason I don‘t know a one of Obama’s former girlfriend’s names, nor do I don’t know anybody he was casually friends with in college or growing up, nor even know what his grades were in college. In fact, as far as I can tell, he’s never ever, not once, done anything untoward nor wrong on a personal level, nor in fact ever associated with any other human being on the planet in a personal sense, ever, besides Michelle.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:12amBombshell? More like a pea shooter…. Angry, scorned ex, nothing more… But hey Newt, some man to man advice…. Quit getting re married, then you can do whatever you want, besides i think it would be pretty cool to have a singlle president … Bad ass pad, playboy mansion on speed dial, custom built 747 and a fleet of Limos… Ther’s a Kid Rock song in there somewhere !!!!!
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:12amGlenn is for Santorum…he was leaning towards Bachmann. Glenn probably would like to see Santorum surge verses Gingrich.
I am a Romney supporter and Beck has never gone gaga over Romney.
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:13amGoJ . . Not enough lurid details for ya, eh? Don’t worry. More is on the way.
Report Post »Todd P
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:17amOkay now, give Glenn his books back…..
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:17amThe key word is EX-WIFE thanks Mike,
Report Post »Hell hath no fury like a scorned woman.
These mindless dults couldn’t find a tree in the forest unless someone put their hands on it.
oldguy49
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:22amlets be honest………….since day one the establishment has decided romney will be the nominee………….everybody that can challange him will be draged trough the dirt…………but who of us has never made mistakes in our personal life???
Report Post »VISITORNUMBER3
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:24am@ HillBilly…I’m not Beck-bashing here. I like Glenn and I agree with him most of the time. not all but most. But what exactly do you mean by “he IS NOT endorsing any candidate but he would personally vote for Santorum” ?
How is that NOT an endorsement for Santorum? Glenn calls into the show from his bed when he’s at home, injured. He constantly talks about his wife, kids and personal life on the show. The show is his life and his life is the show. You can’t separate the two at this point.
I mean, what’s the big deal if he “officially” endorses someone or if he just says 4,786 times “I would personally vote for ________”
Report Post »It’s the same thing. And that’s ok. It’s his show. He pays the bills. Why not just admit he’s endorsing Santorum?
drattastic
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:26amThis is the bombshell, a pissed off ex out to get her ex-husband ,what else is new. If Newt were a democrat there would never have been anything but a coverup by ABC,she would have been laughed at by the lib media ,probably demonized and destroyed.
Report Post »teamarcheson
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:28amOpen Marriage Rights: Everyone Knows About The Truthfulness Of Ex-Wives
Is Newt acting like a Moslem or Mormon both names begin with the letter M. If gay marriage is OK now why not other forms of marriage. If men or women now want multiple spouses, why is it anyone’s business.
New Jersey just passed a law allowing instant marriage and if things don’t work out, a 30 day instant divorce. The marriage certificate has a tear off coupon that can be sent in to the State within 30 days for a instant annulment. New Jersey hopes these instant marriages become popular at international airports.
Report Post »urrybr
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:29amVMan-Mace, Mormons DO NOT PRACTICE POLYGAMY!!! Are you anti-Mormons still going on about that? Try some new dirt. Moron!
Put Romney against Newt, and I’ll pick Romney every time! Newt is a dirt-bag with no integrity. If Newt’s wives can even trust him, why the hell should I trust him to sit in the Oval Office. His personal life tells a lot about his integrity, and morality. My family has had personal dealings with the Romney family, right back to George. They are one of the finest families we have ever known, and their integrity is beyond reproach.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:45amMS-GlenNBC
Report Post »Why are you still listening?
Polwatcher
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:45amI agree completely. Beck is now Romney’s super PAC but Beck will never tell anyone he is for Romney. What kind of crap is this?
Report Post »AnAppealToGod
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:47amhave you heard Beck talk about Romney? He tears him apart.
My thoughts on this is that if a woman is bitter enough to tear her ex husband apart on a national platform, she is not to be fully trusted. I’m sure their relationship was bumpy but for her to tear him apart like this says a lot about the person she is. She’s incredibly bitter, resentful, and wants him to fail. We can only ask what was she really like when they were together……………………………………
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:50amThat‘s right YOU’RE SENSELESS…..we should take a bitter ex-wife’s “timely” interview as totally unbiased and not geared to harm Gingrich’s political campaign. She’s to be believed without any shred of doubt..yes? Idiot.
Report Post »Luke611
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:51amThe post truly reflect the moral decay of this nation. It reflects the utter disrespect of human life, integrity, compassion and honor; and substantiates self-absorbance, ego, and alll things detrimental to positive human evolution and development. As I said before, this man is a narcissist, and the only thing that cures narcissism is a diaper, or a wheelchair, or a hospice…and even then they may still be demanding.
Think about it people, Grinch left his first wife with cancer and the second wife with MS and each time he was involved with an affair. I think the second wife has a great understanding of “karma”; but the issue is this man will bolt when things become to much of a challenge.
He has proven he can not manage his personal life, he has proven he can not manage his elected life,….and yet people are STILL considering voting for this man to keep his finger on the button, and to delegate authority to others in his cabinet.
Now Perry backs him. Perry’s governance is reflective of his grades at A&M… he kcks the can down the road…he’s had every opportunity to close the border but uses political manuevering (not to spoil his latino vote in Texas) and blame it on Obama.
The US Government is a business, dont kid yourself. Those of you who do not select Romney need to evaluate your personal selcetion process. If your not voting for this guy because of his religion, you need to remember this Mrs Grinch’s story:
we reap what we sow.
Report Post »PPMStudios
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:59am@V-MAN MACE
Just curious as to how many Mormons you know? If you know any, how many of those profess to “like multiple wives”?
I thought so. Just more ignorant rhetoric….
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:00pmurrybr
Yea right, Warren Jeffs. We know what‘s up with y’all.
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:02pmwho give a crap about that solyndra on steriods is about the hit the fan.
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6jTOuUVSlg
Obama has stolen billions and billions of TAX PAYER DOLLARS AND IS SET TO STEAL EVEN MORE
V-MAN MACE
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:03pmPPMStudios
I know the ones who come to my door dressed like Count Dracula, looking like little Mitt Romney clones. I usually don’t answer my door and invite them in (ya know..that VAMPIRE thing) and if they trick me into thinking they’re some businessmen or federal Men In Black, I slam the door in their face and get the AR-15 out.
AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!!
Report Post »Bible Quotin' Science Fearin' Conservative American
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:06pmShe was married to him for 18 years. It’s moronic to disregard what she has to say about him. It is not equivalent to what happened with Cain.
Regardless of what she says, Newt left his first wife for a mistress, married her and then left her for a mistress. This happened WHILE he was criticizing Clinton.
The guy has zero credibility. He probably posts here.
Report Post »abbygirl1994
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:12pmV-MAN You are a uneducated inept peice of work.. Mormons do NOT have anything but one wife. It is certainly possible that you are thinking of a group of people who the church has absolutely nothing to do with.. The Mormon church has denounced these people. So when you say the things you do you do nothing but lie. I hope God will forgive you!
Report Post »PPMStudios
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:15pm@ V-MAN MACE once again…
“we know what‘s up with y’all”? WTF? You do? I’m not a Mormon. You actually KNOW Warren Jeffs?
Pretty ignorant dude. Ignorant indeed…..
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:20pmWhat important Newt’s previous marriages or the billions being syphoned off by team obama
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6jTOuUVSlg
Any the cast a vote based on gay marriage,abortion,religious differences or ex wives should be voting. WE’RE BEING ROBBED PEOPLE MORE AND MORE EVERYDAY
rose-ellen
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:27pmat least he asked for her permission .and mormons may not be practcing polygamy now but they certainly did in the past.we practice serial monogamy.one day polygamy will be legal too.
Report Post »RJL
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:29pmIt’s hilarious to listen to Beck on the radio just berating Newt on his divorce. I would love to listen to Becks X and hear all the details on what a sleaze bag Beck is. The only reason his Mormon religion decided to stop with polygamy and plural marriages is because in 1862 the United States Congress passed the Morrill Act which prohibited plural marriage. The founder of Mormon religion was Joseph Smith and he had many wives.
Report Post »rdjones
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:30pmYeaaa, What up wit DAT?
I thinlk Huckster has slipped off into INSANITY, and no one has noticed.
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:30pmShe’s just upset, mad, because Calista is much better looking.
Report Post »I_Hate_Libs
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:31pmAs long as he didn’t ask her to play with cigars or check out the restrooms at the highway rest areas I find this open marriage a non story.
Anyone But Obama 2012!
Report Post »TROONORTH
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:33pmWOW!
Small wonder that Newt got out. What a bitch! Apparently this ‘lady’ has waited all these years to try to destroy her ex-husband. Now that is a ‘woman scorned’!
This has little to do with Newt, and everything to do with a disturbed ex-wife who wants revenge and is willing to lie publicly to get it.
Clearly, she needs mental help. . . .. . . .. . and then shut up and go away.
Report Post »VigilantGuardShark
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:37pmSeems we’ve had a Democrat (Bill Clinton) as President, who chased anything resembling a woman in a skirt and whose wife (Hillary Rotham) overlooked and forgave each exposure with applause from the MSM. Now I’m not saying that what Newt may or maynot have done (after all, it IS his Ex-wife saying so), is a wonderful thing, but I look to his experience and vision for righting the Country and setting us back on course to being the econmic engine of the World. I believe he can and will do that as President.
Report Post »Whereas, Romney may be able to manage the Country better than the current officeholder, I don’t see him expressing a vision that will lead the Country back to greatness. I would still vote for Romney in a NewYork minute before not voting.
little big man
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:47pmI thnik every wife should let their husband fool around, and vise versa.
Report Post »Huguenot Descendant
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:49pmHow did you get that Glenn is for Romney from this story? You sound like Obama trons for Gingrich because you close your eyes to the truth. The Blaze reporting on this story does not mean that Glenn is for Romney, in fact he is avidly against Romney.
But the truth is that Gingrich is a PROGRESSIVE! I knew this before Glenn even said anything, Rush knows this now, and it’s been obvious and apparent for quite some time. Even BEFORE he sat on the couch with Pelosi.
If you don’t believe me, than here is your proof:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWPz1Qdq1uI
This is the TRUTH about the REAL Newt Gingrich, and you will see he is a big time Progressive, you will see that he is only telling you what you want to Hear. Just as Obama did back in 2008. WAKE UP PEOPLE!
Report Post »Huguenot Descendant
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:54pmDon’t forget who voted for the Department of Education and wanted to lock up HUGE portions of the state of Alaska. Don’t forget that this comes directly from the Communist Manifesto. There is much MORE about Newt you don’t get.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWPz1Qdq1uI
Watch the first 5 minutes I urge you. Believe me you won’t stop there. It’s very eye opening.
Report Post »Susie
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:58pmDear MS-GLENNBC
Report Post »Which Glenn Beck you are talking about? The one I watch and listen to every day seems to refer Rick Santorum. So you sure aren’t tuned in to the same Glenn Beck I know.
db321
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:59pmOnce Newt reached into my pockets and took around $75 from me. I am will to go on ABC, NBC, MSNBC and CNN to tell my story – I love this America – under Obama you can accuse anyone and you don’t have to have any proof any of it – just your liberal socialist words.
In fact, my neighbor that has a Santorum sign in his front yard is teaching people how to grow and can vegetables, fruits and Jelly. I‘m turning him into Obama’s Attack Watch.
Report Post »oneshiner
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:13pmOK, I don’t condone married men having affairs, but I also don’t condone women having affairs with married men. Where is the blame placed? I also don’t like our leaders lying, cheating and stealing from the public or being involved with all the horrid corruption that goes on in Washington D.C.
Which is worse? Place blame on one sin and not another? What gave you the right to decide?
We literally gave a pass to Clinton, Jack Kennedy, LBJ, FDR, and of course Teddy who let a woman drown so she wouldn’t throw a monkey wrench in his dastardly deed. Also, didn’t Edwards cheat and worse with a wife sick with cancer?
None of us are perfect, with the exception of Jesus. We all sin and come short of the Glory, but let’s be real. All of us sin in many ways, not just the cheating. Plus, is it for us to decide whether or not Newt did repent and change his life, or is that for God to decide? If God forgives, so do I.
If the MSM were fair to all, they would expose some of the things many of us know about Obama.
It’s not ours to reason why and accuse only the ones that might spoil the corrupt systems choice.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:33pmWas Gingrich ever running on his strong moral character? No: he was running on a strong fiscal background, years of public office experience, and a willingness to play dirty to beat his opponents… GOP or Obama.
This doesn’t change much for me, personally; I was never going to vote for this guy. Out of the three strategies listed above, none of them do much for me (even his fiscal experience is making the government bigger and pandering to lobbyists… bleh). And we‘ve known he’s bankrupt morally this entire time.
So much for a bombshell.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:37pmI’m curious…was Marianne Gingrich (she has apparently kept the name of the man she hates so much) talking about “open marriages” when the divorce took place? Or she feeling “compelled” to voice this stuff now?
Report Post »cuinsong
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:39pmWow, what a revelation another woman that claims her politician husband had an affair and wanted to eat his cake keep her too! This is soooooo.. hard to believe, with all the morality in Washington he must be a real surprise to her. Give me a brake their almost all a bunch of womanizers and that’s just the facts! I think that the only bombshell here is that ABC is trying to make it out to be more then old news and the little miss’s has probably been paid for this attempted smear. Then again maybe Nute needs a song to help him out? called “what did i do to make you feel this way” hope it helps!
Report Post »http://www.reverbnation.com/play_now/song_11314261
Heather Mae 74
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:43pmChief George his baggage isn‘t new nor is it any worse than Clinton’s baggage. Romney also can’t win when he will be playing into the same flip-flopping out of touch rich dude that the MSM will drum happily and that the HATED Bush used against Kerry. If I have learned anything from Glenn is that history repeats itself. For all people who want to judge Gingrich harshly need to read in their Bible about King David who had favor with God. He had his best friend killed so he could have his wife yet his blood line was chosen to bring forth the Messiah. No man is perfect and God warned when his people demanded a king that mans nature would give us leaders with flaws. Whoever is the nominee should be supported to slow down our race to the left and tyranny but Newt’s debate performances and record of being able to be effective in D.C. are far more compelling than Romney’s record. Besides Gingrich’s sins are of a private nature and the MSM is already painting Romney as a fundamentalist Mormon which the left and independents have polled as having a problem with (which is in their bigoted nature)
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:49pmhttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/19/michele-bachmann-endorse-newt-gingrich_n_1216166.html
Rep. Michele Bachmann will not be joining Texas Gov. Rick Perry among failed presidential candidates willing to back former House Speaker Newt Gingrich’s campaign.
T
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:51pmYea, whatever, Warren.
Go back to the Church of Lucifer and Latter-Day Swingers in the middle of Bohemian Grove and take Santorum, Romney, Grinchgrinch and Beck with you. Don’t foget to invite Paterno, Bush, and Cheney and a few congressional pages.
Report Post »dioheerai
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:53pmThis pot bellied pig Newt Is afirming at every debate that marriage is between one woman and one man then comes this bombshell and we should be talking about what again? Get stuffed KOOL AID boy, if any social conservatives go anywhere near this snake then the left is correct and we are all full of IT . The dilution of all our moral fiber starts with these SICK first steps
Report Post »candcantiques
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:56pmhillbillyinny
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:50am
Glenn said weeks ago and has reconfirmed it several times since then that he IS NOT endorsing any candidate, but that personally he would vote for Rick Santorum. What don’t you understand?!
Are you talking about the Rick Santorum that stated that marriage is NOT a right it is a privilege? Rick Santorum is WRONG.
Report Post »Genesis 2:22-24
Then the LORD God made a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man. The man said, “This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called ‘woman, ‘ for she was taken out of man.” For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh
Marriage is an inalienable RIGHT, given to us by GOD. RICK IS WRONG!
filiusdracul
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:24pm@v-man mace
Report Post »Did you come on here just to troll? Stop promoting unedu-ma-cated mis-conceptions. Warren Jeffs is not a Mormon:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mormon_fundamentalism
I support God's Israel!
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:52pmAre all you people from another planet? I can see plainly, who each of these candidates really are, yet most of you, if not all, blame someone else for these candidates ideas and shortcomings. You blame Glenn Beck for calling someone out with a piece of truth and then you MAKE PEOPLE BELIEVE HE IS FOR ROMNEY because he points out Newt’s sins and crazy ideas. ALL THESE CANDIDATES RUNNING are deeply, deeply flawed AND WHAT DO YOU ALL DO???? You settle.
I would LOVE to see a 3rd party run without one of these idiots. The ONLY person I saw with any amount of DECENCY, MORALITY, EXPERIENCE, AND DIPLOMACY was Michelle Bachmann. But, she is a woman. Am I right? Oh, also, she has no foreign policy experience, yet neither does any of the other candidates, especially RON PAUL, yet most all of them WERE IN CONGRESS AND MADE DECISIONS for the rest of us.
This WEEDING OUT A PERSON because of what Glenn Beck says IS THE MOST MATURE THING I HAVE EVER HEARD. If you are a Christian or have some religious affiliation, WE SHOULD BE COMING TOGETHER, BECAUSE WE ALL HAVE 1 SINGLE THING IN COMMON and that is OUR FAITH IN THE ONE TRUE GOD. Choose wisely. Choose the person who is willing TO DO THE HARD THING, AND WHO IS WILLING TO LISTEN TO THE VOICE OF GOD AND HIS HOLY WORD. For someone to choose or follow anything else, is to play with fire and run our country WITHOUT GOD’S DIVINE PROVIDENCE. Personally, this is our last chance to get it right.
THINK PEOPLE. VOTE FOR MORAL
Report Post »Harry Assenback
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:56pmGoJ . . Not enough lurid details for ya, eh? Don’t worry. More is on the way.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Your Sensi…………..We really don’t need to hear your stories about sitting in beanbag chair, eating Cheetos, and watching porn…….
Please keep that to yourself..thanks
Report Post »I support God's Israel!
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:02pmAVENGERK:
I, not once, believe what a 2nd and 3rd party says, so you would be correct.
BUT, I DO BELIEVE WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS. NEWT COMMITTED ADULTERY.
THAT says it all, as far as I am concerned.
IF NEWT BETRAYED HIS WIFE, THEN HE WILL BETRAY US. You’d better believe it.
NO MORALS. NO PRINCIPLES. NO GOOD JUDGEMENTS BASED ON GOD’S MORALITY. Newt should not be trusted and it has nothing to do with the accusations.
IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH THE FACT THAT NEWT VIOLATED A GODLY COMMANDMENT. Has he apologized for this sin? NO.
Report Post »Maji
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:01pmJust out of curiosity,Who…How is this verified???
Was someone else there to clear the he said she said up?
For that matter maybe it was her idea and he said he didn’t want it
Report Post »and I’m out of here.
How do you know!
V-MAN MACE
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:26pmfiliusdracul
Did you actually have the nerve to quote Wiki on Mormons?
That’s funnybecause Romney supports SOPA and NDAA. Voted for them both. Typical.
Warren Jeffs is as Mormon as it gets.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:29pmOk I SUPPORT…I’ll call you bluff. Do we stone Gingrich a la the old testament or do we forgive the adulterer who has asked for forgiveness a la the new testament? Magdeline was an adultress by the way. Gingrich converted to Catholicism many years ago. He’s taken communion. His family is 100% behind him. In the church’s eyes..he’s on his way to absolution. So again who do we accept here champ? The bitter ex wife with an axe to grind or the converted Christian asking for forgiveness? Nice try sport.
Report Post »MacPharlan
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:42amSad thing is I am not surprised by this, it fits the narrative of his wife track record. I just don’t see how he can claim the moral ground, always touting the ‘Reagan Conservative’ line.
He says his attacks on bain are about Character, if indeed character matters to this man, then I find his character wanting. Hate to quote Huntsmen here, but we have a ‘trust’ issue.
Report Post »ROMNEY2012
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:08amGreat point.
I guess we are going to have to choose between the lesser of two evils:
ROMNEY = EVIL CAPITALIST
GINGRICH = SLEAZY ADULTERER
What to do, what to do?
Report Post »Todd P
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:21amI‘ll choose the ’Evil Capitalist’ please…..
ROMNEY 2012
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:36amYeah, but even Reagan had an ex ole lady… Didnt stop him from saving the nation from our National Hemmorhoid .. “ JIMMY THE ROID CARTER ”
Report Post »LibertariansUnite
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:36amYou could be a true Tea Partier and vote Ron Paul?
Na, forget that, Ill pick Establishment! Republicans will fix it like they have before!
Report Post »RejectFalseIcons
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:45amAvarice (Romney – sorry buddy, hiding your money offshore is no way to not live up to the sleazy rich guy stereotype… and just wait til the news gets out again that you used illegal immigrants to landscape your house in MA!)
Adultery (Gingrich)
Sloth (Santorum)
Blasphemy (Obama)
-Or-
Liberty (Paul)
You decide. I’m choosing Liberty. Come with me or don’t. Up to you.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:38pmMotor City, Big difference in a divorce and being a swinger. True or not, I’m afraid this will stick on Newt. Can you imagine the ads Obama would run against Newt in the general? I don’t even want to. It won’t be too hard for the Dems to make Paul look crazy, the “conservatives” have damned near completed the task for them. Next the focus will be on Santorum and he will be cast as a flat Earther homophobe. The fix has been in on Romney for a couple years now. They are just letting us think we’re picking our own candidate. I don’t know exactly who is running the show but, it sure as hell isn’t us.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:51pmGONZO…it won’t stick. People know Newt’s had messy divorces. People know what a bitter ex is capable of. She’s even kept his name for goodness sake. Newt’s leading in Rasmussen right now. I still think Romney will squeak through with the nomination but Newt will make him work for it. Romney appeals to the moderates and independents Obama’s been bleeding out for years now. Gingrich is still perceived as “far right” by the “joe public” voter. This is why Obama’s doing all he can to scare up every lefty vote in the country..hence..no Keystone pipeline. Trust me…the economy is first on people’s concerns not politicians and their indiscretions. The only thing that would hurt Newt with this is an “Anthony Weiner” moment where some tape or photo might surface. Other than that..people are savvy…they know how ex-wives can get. Come on man..she kept his name for goodness sake..how credible is she?
Report Post »I support God's Israel!
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:15pmROMNEY2012:
Well stated. I am a devout Christian, who AT ONE TIME found fault with Mormons. However, because I dug deep, and I mean VERY DEEP into God’s word, I was able to discern the difference between morality and religious doctrine. Most people who find fault with Romney’s religion are fools. They too, believe in Jesus Christ being the Son of God, but their practices are a bit different.
I believe that we should put aside our differences as BELIEVERS IN GOD AND HIS SON JESUS, and come together and unite in faith. While I do not care that much for Romney, at least HE IS A MORAL MAN, even though he is a SOCIAL CONSERVATIVE (his record proves this in Massachusetts). However, I would choose a moral man over an immoral man (Newt).
I do believe Romney will be the chosen GOP candidate. Ron Paul will be the next one to drop out, then Newt. I think if Romney stays in, Obama will be defeated.
BELIEVERS IN GOD‘S HOLY WORD SHOULD UNITE BEHIND A MORAL CANDIDATE AND WE’D BETTER DO IT NOW.
NEWT GINGRICH IS AN IMMORAL ADULTERER.
Report Post »ozchambers
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:43pmLike it or not, it will be impossible to ignore this dirty, messy side of his “private” life now. And like it or not, his presidential candidacy has just flatlined. We should simply be grateful that they didnt sit on it and save it for if he had become the Republican nominee and give Obama another 4 years for sure.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:41pmI SUPPORT GOD’S ISRAEL…Wasn’t Magdeline an adultress also? In your pious “I’m a christian” proclamations have you decided to just dump the most important aspects of Christ’s time on earth? Forgiveness of sin and redemption? Gingrich is a converted Catholic and has taken communion. The church has forgiven his sins before God..you apparently want to see him punished a little more.
Report Post »AuntJane
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 6:08pmWhat to do???? You could vote for the only man who hasn‘t been caught playing around on his wife and hasn’t even been divorced, He’s been accused of racism 20 years ago but the charges were nonsense. The American who wants to audit the Fed, stop waste, return to the Constitution. RON PAUL!
Report Post »Buck Shane
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:06pm@ ROMNEY2012
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:08am
“ROMNEY = EVIL CAPITALIST
GINGRICH = SLEAZY ADULTERER”
All of the above.
Report Post »CTConserv
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:42amAnd why is it that she keeps Newt’s last name?
Report Post »Ex-Democrat
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:16amGood point.
Report Post »SREGN
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:17amHell hath no fury like a woman scorned.
Report Post »chips1
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:20amBecause she can’t spell Heckindorf.
Report Post »SheriS
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:29amWomen usually keep their last name even tho they are divorced because of the paper work involved in changing the name and if children are involved it is more difficult when Mom has a different last name then the kids! There is a lot involved in changing your name and always has been!
Report Post »NOTvotingforRomney
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:48amFox and Friends this morning said she had no children with Newt.
Why did she keep his last name? Because she wanted to LEVY JOHNSTON cash in.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:59pm@gonzo
Report Post »There’s nothing you said that i can disagree with… So now what ?
auntbea
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:03pmI have a question about this second wife: Was she with Newt before he divorced his first wife? I don’t condone the behavior of these cheating men, but I‘m sick of all these women who mess around with other women’s husbands – and other women’s fathers. If this second wife did this and is now blabbing about Newt’s morality (probably for money)… well, there’s a name for women like that.
Report Post »I support God's Israel!
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:30pmAUNTBEA:
YES, SHE WAS WITH NEWT ***WHILE*** HE WAS MARRIED, HAVING AN ADULTEROUS AFFAIR.
So, what do you think of Newt now? Pretend you are God….just pretend. How would you judge Newt?
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:54pmOk I SUPPORT GOD’S ISRAEL…what do you think of Mary Magdeline…an adultress?
Report Post »Puddle Duck
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:25pmGod’s Isreal clearly is not a practicing Christian Avengerk…it‘s another Soros underpants warrior I’m afraid to say. There is no doubt that avoiding the Magdeline question blows up his entire premise since it’s a complete contradiction …you cannot selectively damn sinners…they are all sinners or none of them are. Redemption and absolution are why the Seconmd testament is widely loved today…the 1st testament is more inline with God’s Isreal rigid unforgiving stance and apparently is unaware of or is ignoring the hypocrisy your querey clearly presents him or her as being guilty of.
Report Post »floridacockleburr
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 12:43amISupportGodsIsrael – I think you pretend to be God enough for all of us.
Report Post »Jackson
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:41amWait, wait, wait!!!!!! Marianne was Newt’s first wife! Who he left for his second wife, not Callista! This story is BULL and shame on Glenn for abandoning all his principals and becoming the huffington post!!!! I pray for Glenn to return to us!!
Report Post »ReaganBaby
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:56amWhat did Glenn do he is exposing another Liberal like he has done for years. He likes Santorum.. All you Newt supporters are blind, The guy is a dirt bag and will say whatever he can to get elected look at his record.
Report Post »MrSunshine
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:02amActually Jackson, Marianne is Newt’s second wife. Not that it really matters but the article still makes sense.
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:22amI am a Romney supporter and Glenn likes Santorum not Romney. Glenn and the media is doing nothing wrong by exposing Gingrich’s true character and his sleazy past. Why is it okay for Gingrich to accuse everyone else of being immoral from President Clinton to Mitt Romney?
Report Post »HippoNips
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:30pmMarriane is the second wife not the first
The first wife and Newt have children together and have a good residual relationship
Report Post »Maririane is the whoore that seduced Newt , then got what she desires
westtitus
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:55pmThe Dems and Liberals can’t say anything about this since they all backed Clinton and what he did in OUR HOUSE! This is so hypicritical attacking the Republicans at every turn and our current President cannot come up with anything to run on other than lies to try and when the office again. This is getting to be pretty sickening! If you are not coming up with solutions you are a part of the problem period! Negative attacks will NOT get you anywhere in this election, Americans (I hope) are starting to wake up and want the crap to stop. ONLY SOLUTIONS ALLOWED PEROID!
Report Post »DD313
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:40amI guess Newt picked then wrong church. Catholics tend to frown on such things; he might have gotten away with it as a Muslim.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:48amOr a Mormon!
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:48amI can just see Newt saying “I’do you and you and you..and if my wife doesn’t like it..she can go fly a kite…women are a dime a dozen..the way I see it…she can either cooperate, or go fly a kite, or find somebody else that’ll have her.” lol
Report Post »ReaganBaby
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:59amLocked, It seems like every time i see you on here you spew lies against Mormons, What Mormon would stand for cheating on his wife? Family and the sanctity of marriage are the most important things for us.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:34am@Reagan
“What Mormon would stand for cheating on his wife? Family and the sanctity of marriage are the most important things for us.”
I think you misinterpreted my meaning then. I wasn’t commenting on the cheating, but the concept of an open marriage. LDS was founded with a principle of polygamous marriage; it’s not a secret at all.
For that fact, polygamy was commen in the Old Testament, so we could argue ALL of Christianity was founded on the same (though Jesus set the record straight).
Report Post »Luke611
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:58pmLOCKED
Report Post »Your incorrect concerning LDS being founded upon Polygomy. I’m certian you know that.
3% of the church practiced the principle from 1848 to 1860ish, and it was a calling to do so. Very few practised between 1838 and 1844. However when Governor Lilburn W Boggs signed his extermination order against the Mormon’s on Oct 28th, 1838, Im certain the LDS found it conveinent to move on-to Illinois with this provision, considering then it was against the law to live with another woman other than your wife at that time. This wasn’t done for illicit acts, this was done to sustain the church and yes, we believe it was called of God. This also saved many lives in Illinois, Missouri and later in the newly rugged country of unsettled Utah…but you would be required to study to find this for yourself.
But, I’m certain you know all this…
joel228
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:05amLocked, Jesus certainly did not condemn Abraham who had three wives, or Jacob who had four wives or Moses who had at least two wives. He praised them and said they are in heaven and sit on thrones of power. Jesus would not praise an adulterer.
All that said Gingrich is an adulterer and can not be trusted.
Report Post »Comeandtakeit
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:39amAnd this differs from Bill and Hillary’s relationship how? The only difference is she tolerated the relationship and continues to do so to advance her career. All of sudden, though, a Republican did it ten years ago and it is “news” to ABC. Hypocrisy much? Back then, the same newscasters who will be trumpeting this were excusing Bill because it was “his private life”.
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:43amWhat difference does that make? You’re better than Democrats, remember? You have family values, remember?
Report Post »republitarian
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:40amLet’s talk about your values, Sensei. Are you proud of Hillary for standing by her man as he is accused of adultery, sexual harassment and rape?
Report Post »RightThinking1
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:59am@SENSI:
Report Post »Regarding all of your posts, actually.
What makes Newt’s apparent infidelity news, is that he is the exception that proves the rule. The list of unfaithful Democrats is too lengthy to recount here, but off the top of my head; ANY Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Jesse Jackson, Clinton, Condit, Edwards, Hart, Spitzer, Weiner, McGreevey….
And those are from memory. The great difference is that when conservatives discover a case of despicable behavior, they condemn it and flush the miscreant from their ranks, which is what is happening with Newt, in case you have missed it.
Democrats, on the other hand, often defend, embrace, reward, and nurture degenerate behavior. Could there be a scene more repugnant than the party held in the Rose Garden after the impeachment of Clinton? Maybe. Barney Frank has been an almost non-stop landscape of misbehavior, and yet is the darling of the Dems.
I reiterate, a misbehaving Republican is news, a misbehaving Democrat is, well…, what is expected. It is just in their nature, both socially, politically, and morally.
AvengerK
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:59pmThat‘s right YOU’RE SENSELESS…like a Kenyan immigrant who leaves his loose liberal “wife” with their infant…and then she goes ahead and abandons that child to her parents later on. Or like John Edwards? How about Barney Frank and his boyfriend who ran an escort service from their apartment? But..Barney being the astute and alert liberal he is didn’t know anything about it. Then of course there’s Mr “Blue Dress” himself..Bubba Clinton the serial filanderer and his opportunist wife Hillary. You‘re trying to distract from Obama’s abysmal record YOU’RE SENSELESS..this is all just noise from the left to distract from Obama’s incompent and corrupt tenure. The American people are hurting thanks to little Barry. They don’t care about bitter ex-wives, they care about the economy and jobs..something Obama has mishandled in Olympian proportions. Keep whistling past the graveyard champ.
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:01pmRIGHTBLINKING1
Rudy Guilliani informing his wife that he wanted a divorce via a press conference where he stood with his mistress at his side – remains a perennial Republican candidate.
Mark Sanford hiking the Appalachian Trail when he was actually flying to South America on the tax payers’ dime to see his mistress, with a wife and 4 kids at home – served out his term. Now a Fox News contributor.
John Ensign – shtooping the aide’s wife, then begging for $100 grand from mommy and daddy to pay off the husband – served out his term.
Mark Foley sexting underage page boys in the House.
David Vitter – setting up dates with the DC Madame while on the floor of the House, paying Bourbon Street hookers to diaper him – re-elected by conservatives.
Larry Craig trolling the men’s room at the Minneapolis airport – served out his term.
Bob Livingston was appointed to replace, you guessed it, Newt. And was immediately caught in an affair.
Helen Chenoweth the archconservative Idaho congresswoman who blasted Bill Clinton’s infidelity, copped to a six-year affair with a married rancher.
Don Sherwood the 65-year-old Pennsylvania congressman and his 29-year-old mistress who‘d called 911 from a closet in Sherwood’s DC apartment, charging that he’d choked her. He said it was a back rub.
Dan Burton, Vito Fossella and Ahnold’s love children (with the maid!)
It is just in their nature, both (sic) socially, politically, and morally.
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:05pmREPUBLITARIAN . . I couldn’t care less what happened between Bill and Hillary. Dot care about Newt. But you see, you do. At least you do occasionally, until something like this happens, then you’re suddenly quite liberal in your judgment . . . “Nobody’s business” is what you’re seeing most here today from your fellow and suddenly liberal) Blazers. Hey, I’m all for it. The more often you actually live in a reasonable truth, the sooner you will evolve with dignity and some permanence.
Then again I just have to ask, is this the kind of sanctity and spirituality of marriage that we’re trying to protect from the ravages of gay people?
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:33pmDid you think a bigger list would distract from Obama‘s abysmal tenure YOU’RE SENSELESS? Why not just provide a link champ? it’s easier than having to scroll past your buffoonery.
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 6:02pmREVENGEJERK . . . That‘s not MY buffoonery you’re scrolling past.
heh heh heh
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:39amIt‘s only a bombshell to those who pretend it to be and those who don’t pay attention to news, events, and history. Next..
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:45amTRON’S TWO-STEP PLAN TO GREATNESS
Step #1: Put fingers in ears
Step #2 – Say “la la la la la la”
You should share that with the Heritage Foundation. They could use the help.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:58amI agree .. what’s the big deal ?.. Democrats do this and more. I thought maybe he ran over a puppy or grandma with his car (or maybe off a bridge?) This is the big REVELATION? My goodness this smells of desperation. Heaven forbid we get someone other than Romney …
Report Post »CatB
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:12amSENSI plan …
Head up a$$ >>> vote for Obama agan.
Report Post »ojodoctor
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:14pmI am a republican delegate in my state and pay close attention. I knew he had stepped out on two wives, but an open marriage? This guy is sick. The devil is in the details. No one knew the details. Can’t wait to see the interview. Brings a whole new face to the story. A bombshell for sure and it WILL hurt him. Good riddance!
Report Post »CONNIPTION FITZ
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 6:26pmAsk Mitt about the FTD deal (1994-95) that was essentially a hostile buyout forced on the 20,000 members in writing as a “MERGER” but was actually and legally a SECRETLY held Public Auction that ripped off its members, and was a very questionable legal transaction that was not tested in the courts but was DEFINITELY, morally and ethically, of the lowest caliber. Mitt’s knowledge, participation, and or influence, needs an explanation, with NO platitudes or non sequiturs. The first dots to connect are Meg Whitman and Perry Capital NY. The dots will lead to the money, hundreds of millions.
Report Post »saranda
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 5:34pmTron, I forget was this the wife he cheated on and divorced while she had cancer or was this the wife he cheated on and divorced while she had MS?
Report Post »I thought adultery was one of the big 10. Christians my ass.
clockwatcher
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:39amWhy is this ONLY news if it is republican? Kennedy, Clinton, Gore all are private events and have nothing to do withvthe public man. Same events for a republican, it is a world event and they are not fit to live. The “media is a joke”, do you still have the tingle running up your leg, chris matthews?
Report Post »DD313
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:51amIt’s because the press knows republicans still have a moral compass. Democrats can just shrug it off.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:28amSensei plan::: wait for welfare check and food stamps…. Cuz liberal Arts degree aint cuttin it…
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:20pmDETROIT . . .Don’t you have rubber bands to buy?
Report Post »circleDwagons
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:38amif i asked my wife about an open marriage she would laugh and say go ahead BUT make she cleans the house
Report Post »Mahtoska
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:00amCircledWagons: She must be going through menopause!
Report Post »LibsAndCopKillersALoveStory
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:37amBye Newt! Thaks for the good you’ve done…. You were the smartest candidate, but the most awkward…
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:37amYawn…
Report Post »ROMNEY2012
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:44amNewt Gingrich lacks the moral character to serve as President, his second ex-wife Marianne told ABC News, saying his campaign positions on the sanctity of marriage and the importance of family values do not square with what she saw during their 18 years of marriage.
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:46amGrowing tired of seeing conservatives committing suicide? Not me.
trolltrainer
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:53amYeah…Whatever. And Romney only pays 15% taxes and shelters his money in the Cayman Islands…
Listen, it was years ago, Newt admits his mistakes, and as far as I know we are ALL sinners in need of redemption. I am not going to let this sway me. I dislike Newt for much more important reasons, much as I dislike Romney and Paul for more important reasons than the lame smear attacks imply.
Romney will win, the writing is…has been…on the wall. He will get my vote in the general election. That is all that really matters, The rest is just noise.
Report Post »ReaganBaby
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:06am@TrollTrainer
Romney pays what all other investors have to p[ay on capital gains-15%. He paid the high tax rate on his income he then took that money and invested it and made money so why should have to pay the high income tax rate twice? If you earned 100 dollars and paid 35 to the government and invested the remaining 65, why would it be fair to pay another 35% on the same money? He apid 15% in addition to the 35%.
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:10amRomney2012
Ya know, The “let he who is without sin, cast the first stone” incident is one of the most well-known lessons of the Bible. A woman, who had been caught in the act of adultery was brought to Jesus Christ by the scribes and Pharisees as a test to see if the Messiah was a liberal in matters of the Law of God. In response to their deceitful query, He didn’t condemn the woman, not because He was a liberal, not because He condoned her sin, but because the men who brought the woman to Him were Hypocrites. He was the only person there that day who was free of sin, the only one who had the right to “cast the first stone.” He didn’t stone her (or her accusers), but instead forgave her and told her to “sin no more.” Otherwise, the day is coming when she, if she didn’t thereafter repent, won’t be stoned, but will be burned – along with the hypocrites who brought her to Him that day, if they didn’t thereafter repent of their sin:
I guess you are without sin!
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:18amReganbaby,
I don’t think you quite got the meaning of my post. Read a little more slowly, maybe move your lips.
I DON’T CARE!
I could care less about Romney‘s taxes or Newt’s ho’s. It is all noise and I am getting tired of listening to it. There are more relevant things to talk about.
Report Post »ROMNEY2012
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:05pmBABEUF
Believe it or not, there are still people in this country who want to restore HONOR and INTEGRITY to the PRESIDENCY.
I am a Christian who believes very much in redemption however I do not want this man to be a Presidential role model for my children.
We don’t need to replace our lying Socialist President with a lying Adulterer President.
Report Post »I support God's Israel!
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:57pmROMNEY2012:
I agree with you 100%. Those with morals and those who are Christian (I do not believe you can have morals and NOT believe in God), should COME TOGETHER AND UNITE.
VOTE FOR MORALITY. Newt is NOT a moral person. I am just sick thinking that if Newt gets elected, what will happen in the oval office – CLINTON RETURNS.
GET YOUR BRAINS WORKING PEOPLE. If you are MORAL, do not support Newt. He is a charlatan, A WOLF IN SHEEP’S CLOTHING. You will be sorry if you support him and he gets into the WH. YOU WILL BE SORRY. He has an invisible pact with the devil. My Spirit tells me this.
Report Post »Beckoner
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:37amWe’re ready for a Black President… A Mormon President… A Gay President… But are we ready for a Swinger president?
lol
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:46am@beckoner
Report Post »Hell Yeahh…. Plaboy mansion on speed dial from the oval orafice Baby !!!!! Whoooo Hooooo !!!!
MONICNE
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:35amNewt must have been born with a really large wallet.
tea
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:15amOr a really small soul
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:25pmYet, you both have a Bill Clinton portrait over your fireplace.
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:08pmNUGE . .Here. i’ll give you the line that the Gingrich camp is using . . .”That’s old news. It happened more than a decade ago.”
Chew on that for awhile.
Report Post »alexia asbury
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:03amAnd you must have been born with a really small brain. Same for Brillo(pad)-haired Sensel. Dumb and Dumber!!
Report Post »Mateytwo Barreett
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:35amNancy Grace move to ABC???????
Report Post »Tri-ox
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:34amWell, at least he asked.
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:46amWhy are we still talking about Newty GrinchGrinch and his infidelity?
What is this, an episode of “Days of Our Lives”?
We should be talking about REAL ISSUES like the ones Ron Paul interjects. Instead we‘re being beat about the face and neck with the most tangential stupidity about these neocon candidates’ personal lives and social BS while the media deliberately ignores or attacks Ron Paul. I’m sick of it.
Nevertheless, until more people get sick of it and sick of their manipulation and divergent garbage, they’re going to keep on wielding that drivel like a bludgeon against the truth being discussed.
It’s really illustrative of the relationship the media has with the public and the real way they feel about us. They think we’re all complete idiots.
Report Post »ROMNEY2012
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:17amV-MAN MACE
Believe it or not, there are still people in this country who want to restore HONOR and INTEGRITY to the PRESIDENCY.
I am a Christian who believes very much in redemption however I do not want this man to be a Presidential role model for my children.
We don’t need to replace our lying Socialist President with a lying Adulterer President.
Report Post »chips1
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:34amROMNEY:
Report Post »Alan West isn’t running. Soooo sad.
slr4528
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:35amIf Newt is the nominee…good luck with the women’s vote! I am a republican woman and I feel like I will have to get seriously wasted to vote for this tool…..and I don’t even really drink.
Report Post »momprayn
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:33amWell, sorry to all anti-Newt fans — I’m not crazy over him either (would rather have Santorum over him) – but I really don’t think this will change anything re his popularity. This is old news and many years ago. He’s admitted he made these mistakes in the past so most will think so what – it shouldn’t affect his job as President & give him the benefit of the doubt about his morals in the last few years. Doesn’t surprise ME and if it comes down to him as our nominee, I’ll still vote for him. All I know is we all need to vote for whoever ends up our nominee.
Report Post »bullcrapbuster
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:28pmMistakes????
Report Post »HBTeaMember
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:35pmMOMPRAYN: Hopefully Rick Santorum will win. We need to think about character and not give up on our morals as God fearing people. Vote for the person who you think will be the best person to become president. If we say, oh Santorum can’t win, then it is just like what happened during the 2008 presidential election. We voted for McCain, and Obama won. Do we want Obama again. We can’t go down that same road again. We are running out of time. Santorum, is the true conservative left in the race for president. Let’s not give up hope and lets do a lot of praying, so save our country.
Report Post »ROMNEY2012
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:44pmDoes the faithfulness of a President to his wife impact his ability to fulfill his sworn duty to defend, uphold and protect the Constitution of the United States?
As the case of William Jefferson Clinton demonstrated, yes it does.
The most sacred vow that a man will ever take in this life is his promise to “cleave unto his wife” and none else. The vow of fidelity is paramount to all other promises he makes.
A man who cannot be trusted to be honest with his own wife cannot be trusted to be honest with an entire nation.
Report Post »alexia asbury
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:45amAnyone of the remaining Republicans would be better than this socialist Obama. Another 4 years of him and HOPE could well be long gone! Let us pray this leftist insanity is near it’s end! Liberals are absolutly the nastiest, most intolerant, envious hypocrites that I’ve ever known. They will lie, cheat, steal, even buy/pay their way in, often using thugs to disuade decent, kind people from voting since they will post themselves as close to the voting polls, as possible Not to mention their love of “bearing false witness”. God help us-we need you! BTW, just saying that (a mention of God) pi$$e$ a few liberals off, like unbelievably!
Report Post »TJeff1
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:33amIt could be this?
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/317440
”Little known to the American public Newt Gingrich and his then wife Marianne were the subject of a US Justice Department criminal investigation in the late 1990s involving a $10 million bribe of the world’s largest private arms dealer, Sarkis Soghanalia.
Unaware that Soghanalian was an FBI informant, it is alleged that Marianne Gingrich whilst working for the Israel Export Development Corporation (IEDC) tried to facilitate a bribe to the tune of $10 million so that her husband could use his influence to lift the arms embargo against Iraq in order for Soghanalian to collect an outstanding payment of $54 million from Saddam Hussein. “
That is pretty bad!
Report Post »code green
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:00amOther than the Digital Journal doesn’t have the credibility of the National Enquirer,there might be a story here
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:11amObviously not, the case was dropped.
Report Post »wewantchillywilly
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:33amshare the wealth.
share the women. it’s like the nfl: those guys share strippers. it’s a known fact.
politicians summed up nicely. 98% of them are all like this.
Report Post »LibsAndCopKillersALoveStory
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:32amBye Newt! Thanks for the good you’ve done!
Report Post »Gita
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:32amLol So Newt told you Ms. Gingrich that he wanted an “open marriage” Can you prove this, a video tape of him saying it, an audio tape, a witness hearing him saying it to you? If not your unprovable story is just that, a story.
Report Post »singleparent
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:41amHave you seen his ex-wife ? I believe it lol..
Report Post »Mateytwo Barreett
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:45amSure! Now you want verification! Why would you dare question this womans statements- or motives?
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:05amAmid news that Newt Gingrich’s ex-wife Marianne’s interview with ABC will air tonight, a political veteran who has had past ties to Gingrich, reminds me that the former Mrs. Gingrich has long opposed his running for president.
Report Post »“I think it matters that she’s been saying this **** for years — and has been doing things to tweak him for years,” said this source.
This is actually true.
As the New York Post reminds us today:
In 1995, when Vanity Fair magazine asked Marianne what would happen if Newt ran for president, she boasted she could derail the bid with a single TV interview.
“He can’t do it without me,” she said.
“I told him if I’m not in agreement, fine, it’s easy.
“I just go on the air the next day, and I undermine everything . . . I don’t want him to be president, and I don’t think he should be.”
“There’s always been a real — almost like a jealousy issue with her,” my source adds. “She likes attentiion. And she’s very bitter. And this is behavior of someone who likes attention and is very bitter.”
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/19/marianne-gingrich-in-95-i-don%e2%80%99t-want-him-to-be-president-and-i-don%e2%80%99t-think-he-should-be%e2%80%9d/#ixzz1jv95wSRC
Hanna
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:43pmMotives? You really think she may have a motive for saying these things? Look at her face, it reeks of a broken heart, her body language is that of someone who is totally broken by what he did to her, and still this many years later, she is still experiencing painful bleeding of her heart.
I hope you got this far before you had to run and puke. I swan, motive?? Her motive is HATE, look at her face. She looks like a little demon!! Bitterness fills her and Newt may have said what he said, but it wasn’t about Clarisa, it was about work……this woman literally wanted him all to herself and did not want to share him with AnYTHING. And now she is getting even. Her hate has come on the attack. Newt is a adulator, no question, BUT, he did go to her and ask forgiveness and he went to God and asked forgiveness. God wiped the slate clean. What is she doing? Maybe she now needs to go to church.
Report Post »Nobar
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:31amAnd thusly, the field thins to three. Santorum 2012.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:40am3, yeah. Romney is going to win, Gingrich will give him a bit of a run and Paul is always lurking in the shadows wit 15%…A place he is doomed to remain forever…
Santorum will end up dropping out after Fl.
Not saying I like it…But there it is…
Report Post »NOTvotingforRomney
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:46amtrolltrainer
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:40am
3, yeah. Romney is going to win, Gingrich will give him a bit of a run and Paul is always lurking in the shadows wit 15%…A place he is doomed to remain forever…
Santorum will end up dropping out after Fl.
Not saying I like it…But there it is
______
Romney will have a hard time winning against Obama when that 15% of Ron Paul supporters REFUSE to vote for him. And after Obama gets down parading ROmney’s weird Scientolgy type believes all over the TV/internet, Christians and non Christians allike will LAUGH at Romney and either stay home or vote for a 3rd party.
Anyone who is a FISCAL Free Market voters will run from Romney when Obama’s people remind conservative voters than ROMNEYcare is not free market. And Romney was FOR TARP bailing out PRIVATE banks. And Romney is for TAXPAYER ethanol subsidies bailing out PRIVATE farmers and then forcing consumers (who have NO FREE MARKET CHOICE) to put that PRIVATE FARMER bailed out ethanol in their gas tanks.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:58amI cannot help what the 15% of paultards do, it is their problem. This new tactic of trying to hold the presidency hostage unless republicans vote for Paul is simply ludicrous. If Obama wins he wins, but he won’t. Romney actually has the best chance of pulling in votes across the spectrum from moderate dems to hard core right. He is better than Obama.
If you decide not to vote then more power to you. But not all of Paul’s supporters are stupid enough to re-elect Obama simply because their candidate did not make it and they feel a college aged temper tantrum is the solution. I have no doubt that Romney will win this election in a landslide, much like Obama won in ‘08. When people are fed up and want change they turn out to vote.
You overestimate Paul’s support. Much like liberals, Paul supporters are vocal and active, especially on the internet. But it is still a very very low percentage of the population. The silent majority still rule.
Report Post »martinez012577
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:01pm@troll
Actually its not our problem at all. Ron Paul supporters will vote for the right man, not the one the media wants. We will not hold our nose and vote for another Mcain. I would rather vote right, explain to my children why I did vote the way I did, and prepare for the for what is coming if Dr. Ron Paul isnt elected.
You can call us names, that doesnt bother us. What bothers us is the fact so many Americans are willing to throw away their freedom, give away their money, and vote for the same thing over and over again expecting different results.
Its time for change. I dont think this is over at all. I think the more people listen to Dr. Paul’s message and learn about history they will see the light. This is our last chance I think to turn the ship around before he hit the iceberg. All the other guys including Obama are headed towards the iceberg at just different speeds. We need a president that will turn the ship around. That president is RON PAUL.
Report Post »onevoice760
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:56pmYou Ron Paul supporters ARE CRAZY IF…you believe Obama will be better for our country than Romney. It sounds to me like you are just cutting off your nose to spite your face. A conservative in the White House is better than a liberal and its time you stopped whining and grow up! I know you like Ron Paul–so do I! But I can’t stand the “it’s my way or the highway” approach Paul’s supporters are taking. When Romney lost the nomination to McCain four years ago, even though they everyone knew they detested each other, Romney immediately threw all his support behind McCain so a conservative could have a chance. That takes maturity and an understanding that we don’t always get our way. If Ron Paul won the nomination, Romney would support him and hopefully the rest of the conservative base would too. When all is said and done, defeating Obama should be our top priority and Romney clearly has the best chance of making that happen.
Report Post »booger71
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:30amThis is a bombshell?
Report Post »ROMNEY2012
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:52amThis only a bombshell if you RESPECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE PRESIDENCY.
Conservatives decry Bill Clinton for “Demeaning the Presidency”.
Now you want your VERY OWN ‘CONSERVATIVE’ ADULTERER PRESIDENT?
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:21amRomeny2012,
Funny you only comment on the Newt Gingrich stories…. Must be a BHO suporter! mmm mmmm mmmmm!
Report Post »OR
Marianne is that you?
booger71
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:35amRomney2012
Report Post »You mean like Mitt’s grandpa who moved to Mexico sorry he could keep his multiple wives?
bullcrapbuster
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:31pmHey booger…….yep we should dig up Mitts grand dad,whip him and burn him at the stake.
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:13pmClinton lied under oath. While what he lied about was an issue, the act that destroyed the integrity of the office was lying under oath…He was impeached for lying under oath. Why is that so difficult for everyone to understand or remember? Perhaps because the talking points derived for the media was to focus on the act with ML instead of the crime of perjury
Report Post »ROMNEY2012
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:03pmbooger71
WTF does Romney’s Grandfather have to do with the fact that Gingrich is a SLEAZY ADULTERER?
Since Calista does not seem to have a problem with an ‘Open Marriage”, I‘m sure the Gingrich’s & Clinton’s could have some wild SWINGERS PARTIES IN THE WHITE HOUSE!
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:27pmThis party is the last line of defense before the liberals completely destroy the family unit! Do not give in! Does anyone out there still believe that cheating on your spouse is wrong???
MORALITY MATTERS PEOPLE!
@Kay – yes, we all remember that Clinton’s legal issues were related to his perjury – but some of us ALSO took issue with the whole “cheating on his wife and kids thing.”
Report Post »USPATRIOT101
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:29amHere we go.
Report Post »bba1950
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:23pmDid not Marianne Gingrich break up the first marriage? Wasn’t she having an affair with Newt before his first marriage ended? Come on now, let’s tell the whole story. I do not feel sorry for her….
Report Post »expatinontariocanada
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:27amNow that’s progressive….!
Report Post »