Botched NATO Airstrike Deaths Nearly Double: 15 Civilians Killed in Libya
- Posted on June 20, 2011 at 2:17pm by
Buck Sexton
- Print »
- Email »
NATO has admitted responsibility for a botched airstrike near Tripoli this weekend that killed as many as 15 civilians, according to the BBC, not the 8 initially reported yesterday.
A spokesman for NATO stated that the airstrike intended to hit a military site, but some ordnance missed the target and hit a civilian home instead.
Lieutenant-General Charles Bouchard, commander of NATO’s operations over Libya said:
NATO regrets the loss of innocent civilian lives and takes great care in conducting strikes against a regime determined to use violence against its own citizens. Although we are still determining the specifics of this event, indications are that a weapons system failure may have caused this incident.
Acting under a U.N. mandate to protect civilians, NATO has been bombing Libya for the past 11 weeks. This is the first incident, according to the LA Times, for which NATO has accepted responsibility for civilian deaths.
Meanwhile, the Obama administration is facing a growing bipartisan coalition claiming that the Libyan intervention is in violation of the War Powers Act.
The Obama administration is still claiming that the Libya campaign does not merit any congressional authorization because of its limited scope. A few more ‘weapons system failure(s)’ and this semantic dodge may soon become untenable.
If we are not at war with Libya, we certainly have a strange way of showing it. Watch the report, below, for more:




















Submitting your tip... please wait!
deadbeatjoe
Posted on June 21, 2011 at 8:17amMove along, people. There’s nothing happening here.
Report Post »Pitcher
Posted on June 21, 2011 at 6:19amBHO seems to be this decades “ Babykiller ”
Report Post »Founding Dad
Posted on June 21, 2011 at 5:40amObama thumbs his nose at the Congress. He feels he can bomb anyone anytime he wishes. Lybia is Disneyworld compared to the mass slaughter going on in Syria. How come Obama isn’t bombing Syria???? Oh wait…….Europe didn’t tell him to, that’s why. It’s got nothing to do about saving lives.
Report Post »NuffSaid
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 8:13pmI just can seem to get enough of this. Obama killing Arabs. I just love it. Maybe next he’ll send in death squads to Dearborn MI.
He’s a real butcher. He’s great! He’s my absolute favorite incompetent, racist commie, bloodsucker.
Report Post »Ex_Masshole
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 7:22pmNot war, eh?
So then answer this question: “If a foreign nation, let’s say, Libya, was flying unmanned aircraft over the USA, dropping bombs on government buildings and the President’s house (and occasionally, civilians), would THAT be considered an act of war?”
I’m all for preventing genocide and defending our national interests abroad, but don‘t urinate on our backs and tell us that it’s raining. It’s time that this administration faced the impeachment proceedings that are due for the blatant disregard for the law and the treasonous violation of the sworn oath to defend our Constitution.
Report Post »Crucial411
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 6:50pmAnd the definition of HOSTILITIES is?
Report Post »Eric Von Zipper
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 6:23pmMy friends… Our President sure loves to see children killed… Whether they’re killed in the womb or killed in a Libyan home… The more the better, right Obama?… Piece of trash!…
Report Post »llotus
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 4:30pmOh my. NATO guilty of war crimes? Perhaps NATO should be abolished. NATO members should be tried for war crimes and sentenced to long terms in muslim prisons. Sounds fare to me. I vote, guilty as charged one and all. Lotus.
Report Post »Centralsville
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 4:17pmStop the bombing of civilians by liberals.
Report Post »nomercy63
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 3:19pmSorry won’t happen again until tomorrow! By the way why are we there? NATO that should be your first warning to take cover, couldn’t hit the target if they tried, sorry they are trying,OOPS!
Report Post »inexiletill2012
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 3:19pmTHERE YA GO OBAMA !
here is your “out”
Report Post »powedj
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 2:55pmIt‘s George Bush’s fault.
Report Post »TH30PH1LUS
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 2:46pmIt’s kinetic. Besides, BO‘s lawyers haven’t defined what “Hostilities” means. Congress who?
Report Post »joe3
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 2:43pmNATO needs to face war crimes. this is UN One World Government totalitarian crap. the reason obomber wont follow the law and go to congress is because he has no reason to be in libya. this is not to help americans, this is to promote World Government. that makes obama a traitor. Impeach him, which will amount to shame on his presidency. however it may give us the momentum to end US involvement with the UN, a filthy World Government platform. War crimes.
Report Post »Exrepublisheep
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 2:45pmbushie2 first.
Report Post »GABOB
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 7:21pm@EXREPUB
Bush had the approval of the Congress, so are they and all of the Military Criminals? No! Obomber does not even have the approval of the Justice Department. So this is blood on HIS hands. Where is your code pink? Are you out with a picket sign?
The Reckoning 2012
Report Post »welovetheUSA
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 2:43pmIt happens…………in a war, any war people die, lets not get stupid and put our boys in the middle of this mess.
Report Post »avenger
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 6:09pmtoo late…
Report Post »Exrepublisheep
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 2:42pmSadness.
Report Post »rabblechat
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 2:41pmI guess its better that we kill-em than Kaddaffi…
Report Post »IMPEACHBHO
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 2:34pmWar? What war? Nothing in the media about. BHO decided he didn’t need congressional approval (never mind that the Justice Dept and the Pentagon lawyers said he did need approval)
No ******** are protestiing, screaming, burning effigies of BHO….so….nothing to see here…move along.
Report Post »tinydd
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 2:30pmAhhh, is this “Arab Spring” Barry has been so excited about? Liberation comes to those who are able to “dodge” the NATO bombings. INCOMMING!!!
Report Post »Marylou7
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 2:28pmI thought this was all about saving civilians. Then why the heck is NATO killing them?
Report Post »This_Individual
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 2:27pmAnd the UN doesn’t give a darn (& neither does our prez)! VOTE LIBERTARIAN!
Report Post »let us prey
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 2:23pmObama lied -people died
Report Post »Where are the protestors now?
sWampy
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 2:36pmLove it!!!!
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 2:58pmWell it’s not like there are American boots on the ground, and frankly, Americans do not care when we “Kill others over there so we don’t need to fight them over here,” as was so often said during the last Administration.
Report Post »Ex_Masshole
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 7:40pm@ ENCINOM:
Precedent does not equal Law. You can stop using the actions of past administrations as examples of why it’s OK for this one to break the law and spit on the Constitution.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 2:22pm“The Obama administration is still claiming that the Libya campaign does not merit any congressional authorization because of its limited scope.”
I doubt that these dead civilians would consider it “limited”.
Report Post »I.Gaspar
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 2:21pmWe’re not in charge of the operation but we will sure as hell get the blame for these things.
Report Post »Another feather in his cap.
tbconrad
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 2:19pmWhoops! Our bad.
Report Post »TomFerrari
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 2:35pmNO OUR PROB!
We aren’t at war with Libya – obama said so!
Report Post »hauschild
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 2:46pmNo kidding with the “whoops” comment.
This is what happens when incompetent leaders call for military action. Liberals are good really only at theoretical things like academics. Can’t they leave the crap for those that wear “the big boy pants”???
A liberal’s largest obstacle to overcome: They rarely understand their limitations, and ya’ll know what Clint says about that?!?!?
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 2:56pmTough, it must Suck to be a Libyan.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 2:59pmAnother reason to get the US the heck out of the place, and now, no support for NATO and this insane asylum Mr Obama has created – which is what he wanted anyhow.
Report Post »fastfacts
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 3:14pmYou wish this would never happen but when you are dropping bombs, it happens. Then again, should we be there… NO. Another bad decision for the Obama Administration.
This is just like the ATF’s Fast and Furious. Did you know that htere is possible gun control lobby direction in the operations of this project: http://tiny.cc/pfa7u . Question is… is this an effort to solidify or increase more gun control laws?
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 3:19pm@Fast Facts:
Fast and Furious, like this bothched mess in Libya is meant for more controls to be places via the regulation czar and to increase tensions against the US around the world and on our own borders.
As Van Jones said – pressure and more pressure; top down, bottom up and inside out, and then it will either vent the pressure out or self destruct into their hands for good.
Report Post »Sinista MACE
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 3:20pmEnd this illegal war.
Abolish the Federal Reserve, the financier of falsified wars.
Report Post »jzs
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 3:28pmhauschild, civilian deaths from the Iraq war are estimated to be somewhere over 100,000 deaths (some estimates are closer to a million). I guess that’s what happens when guys with “big boy pants” run a war.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War
Report Post »101
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 3:31pmNice job BHO, it’s his non-war thats killing innocent people!
Report Post »SacredHonor1776
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 3:58pmCivilians or our Al Queda allies?
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 4:24pmThat’s what the alleged hostilities look like.
Report Post »Susan Harkins
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 5:33pmMan, these Humanitarian Missions in the Middle East are really taking their toll on the Humans over there.
Report Post »Dustyluv
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 5:41pmLay it at the feet of Obummer..
Report Post »avenger
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 6:02pmfor all you dopes out there…there are no civilians in a REAL war.the theory of war is complete annihilation of the enemy.what part of complete people not understand ! the last real war was www2,we fire bombed cities in europe and nuked japan. guess who are our 2 best allies today,germany and japan .macv-sog
Report Post »jhaydeng
Posted on June 20, 2011 at 9:15pmWhen you kill one yellow jacket ALL the others in the hive come after you! Let’s get out already!
Report Post »