Senate Passes 4-Year Patriot Act Extension
- Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:17pm by
Billy Hallowell
- Print »
- Email »
WASHINGTON (AP) — Over fervent but scattered objections, the Senate voted by a wide margin Thursday to extend the government’s Patriot Act powers to search records and conduct roving wiretaps in pursuit of terrorists, acting just a month after intelligence and military forces hunted down Osama bin Laden.
Facing a midnight deadline when three terror-fighting tools would expire, the 72-23 Senate vote came after three days of stubborn resistance from a single senator, Republican freshman Rand Paul of Kentucky, who saw the terrorist-hunting powers as an abuse of privacy rights. With the Senate vote, the bill was whisked to the House for an evening vote and transmission to President Barack Obama for his signature.
The measure would add four years to the legal life of roving wiretaps – those authorized for a person rather than a communications line or device – of court-ordered searches of business records and of surveillance of non-American “lone wolf” suspects without confirmed ties to terrorist groups.
The White House gave assurances that the provisions would not expire even though Obama is now in Europe.
“Failure to sign this legislation poses a significant risk to U.S. national security,” White House spokesman Nick Shapiro said.
“As long as Congress approves the extension, the president will direct the use of the autopen to sign it,” Shapiro said in reference to an automatic signature machine used at the White House.
Obama will be woken up at 5:45 a.m. so he can review and approve the bill and then authorize his signature.
A short-term expiration would not interrupt ongoing operations but would bar the government from seeking warrants for new investigations.
The roving wiretaps and access to business records are small parts of the USA Patriot Act enacted after the Sept. 11 attacks in 2001. But unlike most of the act, which is permanent law, those provisions must be periodically renewed because of concerns that they could be used to violate privacy rights. The same applies to the “lone wolf” provision, which was part of a 2004 intelligence act.
Renewal this time was pushed up against the midnight deadline by Paul, who argued that in the rush to meet the terrorist threat in 2001 Congress enacted a Patriot Act that tramples on individual liberties. He had some backing from liberal Democrats and civil liberties groups who have long contended the law gives the government authority to spy on innocent citizens.
Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., said the provision on collecting business records can expose law-abiding citizens to government scrutiny. “If we cannot limit investigations to terrorism or other nefarious activities, where do they end?” he asked.
“The Patriot Act has been used improperly again and again by law enforcement to invade Americans’ privacy and violate their constitutional rights,” said Laura W. Murphy, director of the ACLU Washington legislative office.
But intelligence officials have denied improper use of surveillance tools, and this week both FBI Director Robert Mueller and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper sent letters to congressional leaders warning of serious national security consequences if the provisions were allowed to lapse.
The Obama administration says that without the three authorities the FBI might not be able to obtain information on terrorist plotting inside the U.S. and that a terrorist who communicates using different cell phones and email accounts could escape timely surveillance.
“When the clock strikes midnight tomorrow, we would be giving terrorists the opportunity to plot attacks against our country, undetected,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said on the Senate floor Wednesday. In unusually personal criticism of a fellow senator, he warned that Paul, by blocking swift passage of the bill, “is threatening to take away the best tools we have for stopping them.”
The nation itself is divided over the Patriot Act, as reflected in a Pew Research Center poll last February, before the killing of bin Laden, that found that 34 percent felt the law “goes too far and poses a threat to civil liberties. Some 42 percent considered it “a necessary tool that helps the government find terrorists.” That was a slight turnaround from 2004 when 39 percent thought it went too far and 33 percent said it was necessary.
Paul, after complaining that Reid’s remarks were “personally insulting,“ asked whether the nation ”should have some rules that say before they come into your house, before they go into your banking records, that a judge should be asked for permission, that there should be judicial review? Do we want a lawless land?”
Paul agreed to let the bill go forward after he was given a vote on two amendments to rein in government surveillance powers. Both were soundly defeated. The more controversial, an amendment that would have restricted powers to obtain gun records in terrorist investigations, was defeated 85-10 after lawmakers received a letter from the National Rifle Association stating that it was not taking a position on the measure.
In practice, law enforcement has used the three provisions sparingly. According to a senior Justice Department national security official testifying to Congress last March, the government has sought roving wiretap authority in about 20 cases a year between 2001 and 2010 and has sought warrants for business records less than 40 times a year, on average. The government has yet to use the lone wolf authority.
But the ACLU also points out that court approvals for business record access jumped from 21 in 2009 to 96 last year, and the organization contends the Patriot Act has blurred the line between investigations of actual terrorists and those not suspected of doing anything wrong.
Two Democratic critics of the Patriot Act, Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon and Udall of Colorado, on Thursday extracted a promise from Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., that she would hold hearings with intelligence and law enforcement officials on how the law is being carried out.
Wyden says that while there are numerous interpretations of how the Patriot Act works, the official government interpretation of the law remains classified. “A significant gap has developed now between what the public thinks the law says and what the government secretly claims it says,” Wyden said.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., while supporting extension of the Patriot Act measures, also pushed for changes to make the law more transparent, including requiring the Justice Department to periodically report to Congress on whether the powers in the law were being used properly.
Leahy had also sought to require the government to show greater evidence of a link with a terrorist threat when it asks for access to business records such as library circulation records or book seller records.
Popular Stories
MSNBC Host Snaps in Heated Segment: ‘What in the World Is Riskier Than Being a Poor Person in America?’ 695 Comments
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 664 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 525 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 364 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 364 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 235 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 249 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order Read More- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 147 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 235 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (91)
SevenDogs
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:24pmIt’s absolutely amazing that more Dems voted against the Patriot Act provisions than did Repubs. Read the last 2 paragraphs of the Fox News article (link above). Leaky Leahy is on the right side of this. I’ve fallen through the looking glass, for Pete’s sake!
For those of you who support the 2nd amendment (all, I hope), this is really bad news. Without Rand Paul’s “no gun registration” amendment, all the BATFE needs is a sympathetic FISA judge and they could pull-in every 4473 form in the country, thereby compiling a gun registration list.
There is the McClure-Volkmer law dating back to 1986 (which prohibits Federal gun registration), but the legal thinking I’ve read indicates that, when 2 laws are in conflict, the more recent law takes precedence. So, the safeguards of McClure-Volkmer don’t sound so safe.
It gets scarier when you consider: 1) The BATFE already has a new proposed rule on deck that would require registration of any person purchasing more than 1 semi-auto. (I guess ATF doesn’t want competition biting into their gun trade to Mexico-see “Operation Gunrunner”; 2) the recent revelation of Zero‘s comment to Sarah Brady that they’re working on gun control “under the radar” (Cass Sunstein, call your office…) What Zero can’t get done via legislation, he’s doing by dictate (are we Venezuela yet?) I’m sure these continued Patriot Act provisions will help in their quest.
AND, the Republicans are helping him do it.
I think we
Report Post »american1st
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:32pmi would vote out every person in every office if i could….
Report Post »but i am afraid you are right
i think we are…
Southern Rebel
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:18pmThis is legislation that we will never see an end to. It will never be voted down and will now always be a part of American life. Goodbye Liberty…hello Police State.
Report Post »kickagrandma
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:17pmI want the names of each and every soon-to-be-ex-senator who voted FOR this extension of abuse of power. I will be on them like white on rice!
When first passed, right after the 9-11 attacks, there was REASON, R-E-A-S-O-N to have it in place. There is no reason any longer to have it.
The answer EX-senators is NO!
Report Post »temple62
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:11pmIn Congress out of their minds? Now the Democrats can use this to monitor our cell phone conversations, text messages, track our internet navigation, resume pat downs by TSA, sell more automatic weapons to drug cartels and continue to give billions in foreign aid to out faithful, loyal muslim allies of Egypt, Iran, Iraq,Libya, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Afghanistan! Is this what the Republicans want? Just because it was George W. Bush’s original idea does not mean it was ever a good idea – it never has been. This is another Nazi tactic for Obama to force the taxpayer to be “transparent while his administration is not!” And he can legitimately blame it all on Bush!
The taxpayers need a list of all GOP who drink this Kool-aid and they need to be voted out next election!
Report Post »Bonnieblue2A
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:44pmThe list is right there in the link to the roll call. I am very disappointed in my own RINO Senator Blunt who just was elected to the Senate in November 2010. Why didn’t Rubio vote?
roll call: http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=112&session=1&vote=00084
Report Post »ED4237
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:02pmNot a big surprise the government making sure to steal our rights away from us right in front of our faces. This all done of course to protect us we are weak and they must be able to spy on us with telling us. Then when wdo something they don’t like whamo you will get arrested and that has nothing to do with terrorism.
Report Post »cloudsofwar
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:14pmyou got it.
Report Post »cloudsofwar
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:59pmWe got screwed again. gun owners look out your the enemy. another nail in the coffin. Now BO can spy on you and it’s legal.
Report Post »Reduce.Our.Govt.Footprint
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:58pmAnd here we go again, when is the next election???
Report Post »cloudsofwar
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:06pmWill the next election HELP?
Report Post »Reduce.Our.Govt.Footprint
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 8:13pmWe can only hope, but no matter, it has to be better than this!!!
Report Post »theamericanvision
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:57pmI supported the original Patriot Act for the simple reason that we didn’t know who are enemy was and we needed to find out, fast. I swallowed the bitterness thanks to the provision that as soon as the smoke cleared, a clear-headed congress would have to re-visit the provisions and adjust the bill accordingly.
…I now see that was too much to hope for.
Paul has it right. Why this can’t be reviewed and discussed openly without the mud-slinging just goes to show how far we have slid as a people.
Keep on searching diapers, frisking 6-year olds, tapping our conversations and enjoy reviewing our records. I‘m sure we’re much safer now.
Report Post »FreedomEagle
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:54pmMidnight?…..and he’s where?……..
Report Post »LastCallForEmpathy
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:53pmWhy do i have to do push up’s when it was gomer pile who screwed the pooch?
I’m sure there are some “Patriots making a good living off of the ”Patriot Act”…
What a joke…Whats that speaker in the corner of the room? Oh its time for my morning jumping jacks…..
Report Post »ALPHA18BRAVO
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:51pmWhen do we get to stand up against the government intrusion?
Anybody remember the story about the Marine in Arizona who was shot over 50 times by police in an illegal raid, the man was protecting his family against armed raiders. The “SWAT” team startled his wife, he grabs his rifle to protect his family, and then he is shot by the police. I think that it was around 60 or 70 shots. What ever happened there?
There has to be a limit to the government power. I am all for stopping terrorists, but some things go way too far.
Report Post »1stAdmendment
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:51pmIt’s a violation of the fourth Admendment!
Report Post »Mr. Oshawott
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:43pm@1stAmendment
Very well said! The Fourth Amendment of the Bill of Rights within the U.S. Constitution prohibits the police from exercising unwarranted searches and/or seizures (this also includes the searching and/or seizing of your vehicle).
Report Post »CTG INC
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:49pmJust another steping stone to shreed some more of our rights I gess i onaly have ron paul to vote for now ill vote against both my georgia reps nest trip no more rino repubs.
Report Post »one yrs. food ration like Glenn says..
Posted on May 27, 2011 at 6:59amAmazing that you can vote with your writing abilities… Please take an english class before going into the booth.. Thanks..
Report Post »Bonnieblue2A
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:45pmTypo, should read four liberty loving GOP members.
Report Post »Bonnieblue2A
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:45pmOnce government has power it never, ever gives it up without a fight. Shame on those who willingly trade liberty for security for we as a nation will get neither.
It would appear that there are only 3 liberty loving Conservative GOP members in the Senate: Paul (R-KY), Heller (R-NV) , Lee (R-UT) and Murkowski (R-AK) who voted Nay.
Roll call here: http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=112&session=1&vote=00084
Report Post »nomercy63
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:44pmThey need to pass this, Grandma needs to be fingered at the airport!! How about it target our enemies instead of our citizens, Oh I forgot targeting citizens is what they want!
Report Post »let us prey
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:35pmUnable to protect us on the borders or from wall st.
Report Post »Interesting and sad.
AzDebi
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:47pmWell said!
Report Post »sbleve
Posted on May 27, 2011 at 7:25am““A significant gap has developed now between what the public thinks the law says and what the government secretly claims it says,” Wyden said.”
This measures the size and weight of Government. There is perhaps for tomorrow No law that has any daily meaning. Tuesday it means green and Friday it means red.
Boy Pharaoh – God like, if not God himself.
Report Post »ares338
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:29pmFight terrorism with government intrusion? Now they can do anything they want. All they have to do is say ….NATIONAL SECURITY and bend over!!!!!!!
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:29pmPapers papers please it’s coming,the patriot act should have never been enacted,it just gives the government more control over the sheep.We’re in deep here people.
Report Post »scoter
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:27pmWhy am I NOT surprised?
Report Post »This is nother but BS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Aaron in Polk County
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:26pmWheee…
Report Post »one yrs. food ration like Glenn says..
Posted on May 27, 2011 at 6:41am@TECHNICAL11 ,( Says )…… Now to have this freaking Neo-Con Marixt clique in DC to steal them away with the stroke of a pen. (and then he says)…. My Senators and Congressman will be hearing from me on this issue and it will become a bigger issue as the days pass. The days of this tyranny will come to an end… What with just you and your one voice yelling at him , ala stroke of the pen ?
Report Post »opNorthwoods
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:23pmRand Paul was the only one with a brain there , be prepare for the gestapo
Report Post »Stopit
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:39pmAnybody know why his amendment didn’t get passed? Wasn’t it voted on? I contacted McConnell to no avail. Tie this in with the “we’re working on gun control under the radar” comment of Obama.
Report Post »american1st
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:55pmanother blow struck against freedom and liberty, i hope Rand Paul’s amendment passed, but knowing how much the republicans and democrats are on the same page when it comes to expanding the government, i wont be surprised if it didn’t..
Report Post »american1st
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:12pmi just checked, no surprise, the Rand Paul amendment failed …
Report Post »cheezwhiz
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:22pmSo what is the definition of a ” terrorist ” now ?
Report Post »RLTW
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:44pmAny one of these things places you in what progressive conceder a terrorist.
White
Conservative
Religious
Gun owner
Veteran
I’m all 5, so I am really in for it.
Report Post »cheezwhiz
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:59pm@ RLTW
Report Post »sssssshhhhhhh….don’t say that in public.
The new online -media thug ( who probably used to tweet on behalf of the Secret Service) lurks here too.
:D
Don’t alert him !!!
Juan Gault
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:21pmWhy am I NOT surprised?
Report Post »one yrs. food ration like Glenn says..
Posted on May 27, 2011 at 6:52am@LIBERTARIANSUNITE.. Yeah Ron and Rand Paul, you mean the Rand Paul that voted AGAINST the Ryan budget plan a few days ago ? Joining only 4 other repubs ( scott brown, olympia snowe, susan collins … Yes he is such a patriot..
Report Post »the_ancient
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:20pmI am sure the DEA will be pleased….
Terrorist…. Dont really care
Report Post »NOKOOLAIDDRINKER
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:27pmRight terrorists won’t care but we all will when they come for us!
Report Post »cheezwhiz
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:32pmTerrorist…. Dont really care
Report Post »————
What is a ”terrorrist” to you and me is a friend and ally to the Lying King .
poverty.sucks
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:32pmSave or Created how many jobs?
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:36pmAwful awful awful.. These Republcans know better.. There’s no excuse! This is awful legislation absolutely awful! Our forefathers fought for hundreds of years to get to the point of where they only dreamed of receiving such freedom and liberties which they eventually bestowed upon us.. Now to have this freaking Neo-Con Marixt clique in DC to steal them away with the stroke of a pen.
It’s Treason! Hate to sound unglued but it’s simple treason. Disgusting! My Senators and Congressman will be hearing from me on this issue and it will become a bigger issue as the days pass. The days of this tyranny will come to an end…
Report Post »AzDebi
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:46pmGrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!
Report Post »banjarmon
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:49pmHow will this law help? They can’t even track or find terrorist with all the PC crap that is involved.
Report Post »Brasil2520
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:49pmTo Techengineer11
I apologize for the late reply, I had a tenant problem, and I appreciate your “pit bull” comment.
Report Post »I’ll answer your question if your still logged on?
the_ancient
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:01pm@NOKOOLAIDDRINKER
I have a better chance of being killing in a botched DEA/SWAT raid then I do in a Terrorist Attack
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:02pmMy letter to my Congressman and Senators.. If you agree with it or sympathize with it use it and let the cowards know how wrong this legislation is.. Far as I know only Rand Paul and one other Senator voted against it..
I’m incredibly disturbed by the renewal of the Patriot Act. I find this piece of legislation absolutely inexcusable! I connect the legislation with Treason against the United States Constitution and I believe every US Senator and Congressman that supports this legislation has blood on their hands and evil in their heart. My forefathers fault for ages to secure the freedoms and liberties which they eventually bestowed upon us and to think that some spineless gutless shortsighted Representative would sign away these precious rights in the name of some conjured up all encompassing so called “War on Terrorism” is beyond comprehension!
Is there not a person in DC with love of country and integrity in their heart any longer? How can you possibly sell us out like this? Was it a mere 30 pieces of Silver? How can you live with yourselves? You disgust me! How dare you call yourselves Patriots!
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:04pmBrasil2520: Hey I vaguely remember that reply.. Refresh me.
By the way there were 23 Senators who voted against it.. I better do a little research before I send that letter out.. lol
Report Post »Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:11pmCheezewhiz or Showtime or Sacred Honor:
One of my coworkers mentioned Harry Reid attached an anti-gun amendment to this bill. I can’t find anything about it, have you heard anything? Thanks.
Report Post »LibertariansUnite
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:13pmThanks TEAparty for voting for the Patriot Act,
Maybe the “teapartiers” on this site should come to people willing to fight for their Liberty. Ron and Rand Paul.
Report Post »Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:20pmI hope no one voted for this act on this site, that would mean we have memebers of congress lurking on this site. We don’t need deviants hanging around here, we already have Encinom.
Just kidding Encinom, just checking if your out there.
Report Post »cheezwhiz
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:27pm@ Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Report Post »I didn’t know about that , but once its signed maybe we’ll find out what is in this bill .
Frankly I wouldn’t be surprised if the regime that runs guns for mehican drug cartels do something
anti-American and let it glide past the idiots of the Congress
Brasil2520
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:33pmTo Techengineer11
You called me a “pit bull” and asked if I was white, and about how the klan would not have accepted me, and what motivates me.
About your Klan question, the Klan was/is so restricted to who they get as a member that since I’m a foreigner, they would put me in a body bag and send me back to Brasil.
That’s what doomed the klan, like the Waffen SS, so few people qualify to be a member, they can’t grow.
You can’t exclude 95% of the population and expect to win a election.
I did love that movie, The Birth of a Nation, 5 STARS !
About my race my family is from Northern Portugal we are white, southern Portugal was controlled by Arabs a 1,000 years ago and the integrity of the species was destroyed, like the people from Sicilia they look nothing like northern Italians, northern Italians could pass for Germans.
About what “motivates” me, 40 years ago I saw the future of America in Sao Paulo, Brasil. Since Portugal gave up on Brasil 100 years before the America Civil war, Brasil is 100 years advaned more than America in the myth “beauty of diversity” – result, we have highier crime than America, the Portuguese culture, tradition all gone, this is what we got for 250 years of multi-culturalism, Brasil looks more like Africa than Europe, in another 100 years America will also.
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:39pmBrasil2520: Appreciate the response. Sorry about the tenant problem.. Would imagine that line of work carries its fair share of headaches..
Report Post »Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:40pm@Brasil2520
seja bem vinda
Stand your ground, and ignore the trolls.
Report Post »Lotus503
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:44pmIt still has to make it through the House of Reps…so PrEsSuRe them into voting it down.
Report Post »LOOKING_BOTH_WAYS
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:54pmeven without the Patriot Act, the Gov‘t still spy’s on its citizens. they just can’t use it in a court of law. but they will find other ways to take you out
Report Post »Brasil2520
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 7:55pmYa the tenant lost his job and of cause his old lady left, the same old. For me to fix the home back up takes about a month.
Report Post »About what I wrote about America, it breakes my heart to think America will one day look like Sao Paulo, and I get nauseated when I see the news about a white woman that got raped by the animals, 50+ years in America news of a black on white rape was a shock, today whites don’t care, like that rape of Anne Pressly, that was sick ! the news of her murder didn’t last long on the TV :(
Brasil2520
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 8:00pmTo Darmok
Saude ! ! ! “ To your health ”
Report Post »LibertariansUnite
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 8:38pmGood thing Michelle Bachmann and Allen West voted for it!
Some real American Patriots right there!!!
wait…
Report Post »tower7femacamp
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 8:48pmOrder, even drunk I can see the truth.
Report Post »Sinista MACE
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 8:50pmVote em all out, or throw em out forcibly.
It’s that serious.
Report Post »one yrs. food ration like Glenn says..
Posted on May 27, 2011 at 6:36amObama = against patriot act with Bush president…… Obama = FOR patriot act when Obama president..
Report Post »Oh how transparent this flip flopper is. huh ?
techengineer11
Posted on May 27, 2011 at 8:31amone yrs. food ration like Glenn says..: The message I aim to deliver daily on the Blaze is that it’s not about BC, GWB, or Obama it is the Apartheid pulling the strings. This move should help make it far more obvious to the disinterested viewer.
Obama today vs the campainger are two entirely different animals.. Some of the Pundits say well he sees the threats now.. I say ha! No he‘s doing as he’s told to do.
Report Post »hud
Posted on May 27, 2011 at 10:15amDoes this keep the serial molesters feeling people up in the airports? Can’t be good for America, o’s gonna sign it with the auto electric pen
Report Post »