Bush Memoir Sells 2 Million Copies in 2 Months — Nearly as Many as Bill Clinton Sold in Six Years
- Posted on December 24, 2010 at 1:23am by
Meredith Jessup
- Print »
- Email »
The world may have underestimated the publishing power of George W. Bush, the UK’s Daily Mail suggested Thursday. “For someone who mangled words on a regular basis, it’s an impressive feat,” the Mail noted after the former president’s publisher announced his memoir “Decision Points” has sold an astonishing two million copies since it was released in early November.
Bush’s “Decision Points” hasn‘t even been released in a paperback edition yet and already it’s approaching 2.2 million copies — the number of copies President Bill Clinton’s “My Life” has sold since its release in 2004.
“Decision Points” offers readers a look inside President Bush’s time in office, as well personal memories from his childhood, family life and predictions on hos history will judge him.



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (207)
kryptonite
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 6:15am@Silverracer
Do you think Bush WANTED Gitmo. It was and still is a necessary evil, that‘s why it’s still open although the Liar closed officially closed it. TARP was Paulson’s baby. He played Bush big time. I don’t think Bush was perfect, but he wasn’t out to transform America into a commie utopia. We’re headed to loss of our freedoms. Did you feel as a law-abiding citizen feel that type of threat under Bush?
How can a country declare war on a tyrant they intend to take out? Saddam was forewarned, which I think was a huge mistake, but the “war” was supposed to be a series of quick, devastating air strikes, “shock and awe,” remember?
Report Post »silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 6:22amYeah, I think he did want GITMO because he thought he could escape the attention of the American public there. The constitution says anyone in our jurisdiction has the right to due process, not just citizens. And no I didn’t feel threatened like I do now when Bush was President. That was also before I woke up.
“How can a country declare war on a tyrant they intend to take out?” Jeez, I guess there was no need to declare war on Germany then. And that’s what the war was supposed to be, but look what it turned into.
This country has abandoned the Just War Theory of Christianity.
Jim in Houston
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 12:40pmSilveracer: Take another sip of kool-aid and STFU.
Report Post »silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 1:27pmWow.
Report Post »JoeofPA
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 5:58amIf President Bush wanted to explain himself he should have made the effort while he was President. Writing a book now only helps him. If he had tried to explain himself while President, we would have avoided the Democrat majorities that forced the nightmares of the last two years down our throats.
Report Post »gr8photoman
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 8:18amYou know Joe, I thought the same thing dozens of times during his administration. Why doesn’t he just give a speech with a simple PowerPoint presentation and explain X,Y and Z to the American public? I always thought it was because of national security, but if I’m not mistaken I remember someone (maybe Hannity?) asking him a similar question and his answer was words to the effect that he knew the press was against him, his message would be misconstrued so what was the point?
Report Post »Sad, because I agree–with a better explanation I think some of the Congressional damage from 2006 could have been avoided.
dontbotherme
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 4:54pmJoeofpa – If President Bush would have wasted his time trying to explain what he was doing & why while he was still president he would have (sounded) been just like little baby whiny o’bama. He was busy doing his job. …& GR8 is right. No matter what he said it would have been twisted & misconstrued.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 5:52am@Esthers_daughter
Report Post »That was a moving comment, and I wholeheartedly agree, I miss Bush because he was a patriot, and when he stepped down the fools in America got us a traitor.
DeltaHawk
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 5:27amLliberals> WAaaaaaaaaaaahhhhh!
Report Post »justice
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 5:26amGo, President Bush. You were a good President. Wish you were still here!
Report Post »Living In NYC
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 5:22amYep…what do you expect a man with integrity….or one with a teenager in a blue dress.
President Bush we miss you and your zeal for exceptionalism in you life in and for our country!
Merry Christmas to all!
Report Post »BoilitDown
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 5:15amThe really good thing about this is that Chris Matthews and his ilk are probably having a major emotional meltdown about their former statements about Bush coming into scrutiny.
Report Post »silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 4:43amBush was not a good President. Unconstitutional PATRIOT Act, unconstitutional wars, massive spending (BESIDES the “wars”), DHS power grab which hasn’t made us safer. If we get another “republican” like this guy or McCain we’re done for.
bikerr
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 5:23amBush knows how many states in the United States Of America. Unlike your hero.
Report Post »silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 5:27amWhy would you get the impression Obama is my hero because I’m criticizing Bush? Obama has continued/expanded all of Bush’s bad policies. I guess I’m just a real conservative.
tower7femacamp
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 7:37amsave it SILVER, the NeoCons have a Psychological condition that
Report Post »will not allow them to admit they were wrong.
I know 1st hand I am a recovering NeoCon and voted for Bush both
times, but I have since realized I was miss led and possibly a victim
of Media Mind control.The Facts are his Patriot Act destroyed the America I love so much.
silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 7:52amI’m also a recovering neocon. I voted for Bush, supported the war, and even joined the Marines because I supported the wars so much.
tower7femacamp
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 7:58amSilver I guess it’s like ex smokers ? Fool me once
Report Post »shame on you Fool me twice shame on me.
I support Ron Paul but refused to vote for either
McCain or Obama, I could see the fix was in
either way we would have gotten the same.
silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 8:03amI supported McCain in ‘08 actually. :-/ My bad lol. I read Ron Paul’s book shortly after those elections and now no one but him will get my vote in 2012.
Reagan/Demint.deciple
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 9:46am@ silverace44 ,you know, I keep seeing you say “the wars,WHICH HAVEN’T MADE US SAFER” what the hell are babbling about ? You’re able to sit here on this site without any fear posting your liberal talking points all because of our brave over seas KEEPING US SAFE.. Tell me, have we been hit with another terrorist attack since 9/11 ? Yes there have been many tries but unsuccessful ,unless you want to count Fort Hood, but as the libs love to say this was a single act by a disturbed young man. Hogwash.
Report Post »Let the unconstitutional thing go about the wars and start focusing on the obamacare bill that is unconstitutional affecting us here on U.S soil… I don’t know about you, but I don’t like being TOLD by the government ,that just to be an American I have to buy something…focus on that..
silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 9:51amWow. What is the deal with people thinking I’m a liberal for criticizing the wars?! Republicans were elected to end the Korean War. Republicans were elected to end Vietnam. George Bush was elected because he ran on a humble foreign policy and against Clinton’s interventionism. How have they made us safe? Americans die everyday overseas while new terror attacks are foiled or warned about everyday here. Unbelievable. Have you read all of my posts? Or did you just skim a few and judge me?
poverty.sucks
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 3:32amThank you for your service Mr President Sir.
Report Post »fishstx777
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 3:13amsorry iraq
Report Post »Reagan/Demint.deciple
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 9:33amHey, If you feel that bad and passionate about Iraq why not hop a plane and help rebuild the country?
Report Post »Sorry, ??? Sorry for what ?
smamere
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 3:12amA great read with the inside story of the many challenges the President faced. Enlightening to hear the truth about his motivations and thought processes. An upstanding straightforward man. Can’t ask for more, whether you agree with him or not. At least you knew where he stood. He did a heck of a lot more right than wrong and I never doubted, for one minute, his love for this country and the military.
Report Post »silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 4:45amAnd the average Democrat has never doubted that Obama loves this country and military. I doubt either of them do.
tower7femacamp
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 8:01amBush and Obama both Love the One World Govt and worship
Report Post »Lucifer thru secret Satanic Societies.
kryptonite
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 8:10amDims have become radicalized. For the most part, they don’t care whether their wimpy presidents love the military. In their view, it is not a sine qua non for a successful presidency.
Report Post »fishstx777
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 3:06ampresident bush is a kind generous man . But I disagree that he was a great president .he had control of the house and the senate and failed to secure our border due to either his love of big business or cheap labor .Now our border is in total madness and he turned the keys over to a open borders loving socialist who will due everything in his power to make canada u.s and mexico one country.he attacked iran but refuse to go 100 percent with the surge that would have stabilzed that country years ago.My idea of a real leader is due what the American people want you to due .protect our country and most of all our citizens first. And dont be telling me how secure we are until were able to secure our own ports and borders first.And in every speech I want to hear I am here to due want the american people want me to due.Then i will say we elected a great president.
Report Post »HippoNips
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 4:06amTotal non-sense , Bush started the fence and it doesn’t build itself.
Report Post »silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 4:39amTotal nonsense? He was for amnesty…
brliantedj
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 2:52amWhoa, you’d think EVIL capitalism was at work. Nah just ye Ole good ol boy.. WHAT this is fer real. OMFG America still rules.
Report Post »vonryansexpress
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 2:26amIt’s a well written book by a historical and quality person.
In French dictionaries, (the Larousse for example), great public men are called, “homme d’État”; Man of State.
Report Post »Such is a fitting description of George W. Bush.
dawgPound
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 3:51amHe is responsible for EVERY American death in Iraq and Afghanistan. He lied to garner support for the invasion of Iraq. Iraq did not attack the U.S. Iraq had no WMD. It was HIS agenda to invade, therefore it is HIS hands that are covered in AMERICAN blood.
Report Post »Psychosis
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 5:49am@ dawgpound…………..your full of it it was not his decision alone, and given the information he had at the time , the decision was justified, and a vote in congress backs him up…. and that small fact makes that decision constitutional
Report Post »silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 5:58amNo it doesn’t make it Constitutional. Congress MUST declare war. Believe me, I used to think like you on this subject. But when you invade and occupy a country, topple their government, and fight their military (in Iraq)…that’s called war. We never declared, therefore it’s unconstitutional.
scguitar
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 2:21amYou know, maybe Michael Moore should read it. Give him a little insight into what the president thought instead of coming to some ridiculous liberal conclusion
Report Post »kenny1960
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 2:02amThe Soros funded hate tanks must be foaming like rabid dogs because all the slanderous lies they tell on a daily basis have not stopped the enthusiasm people feel for former President Bush. He was not as hated as they thought he was. And in light of what we now have in the White House he looks even better than ever. He may have mangled his words at times, But at least he could give a speech or talk to his staff without a teleprompter.
Report Post »realindependent
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 8:12amwhat about the koch brothers funded red state, drudge report, right wing radio.
or fox news saudi prince funded republican spin machine?
Doesnt it sound funny that corporations and billionairs fund the right and left politics so we fight with each other all day. while they rob the middle class and this country of its wealth?
ChiefGeorge
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 2:00amGod Bless President Bush.
Report Post »dawgPound
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 3:47am…GWB is a war criminal who should be charged with the mass murder of EVERY soldier and civillian who has died because of the wars that were started on false pretenses (..lies) and covered up by him and others in his administration.
Report Post »silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 4:36amDawgpound, agreed. I used to support the wars but not anymore. They’re unconstitutional. Neither follow all the qualifications of Just War Theory. We’re no safer. Thousands of Americans have been killed and tens of thousands maimed. And now we‘re just straight up occupying two countries which isn’t helping our safety here at all, while increasing international hatred toward us and making us more susceptile to hostile actions. War is profitable folks – that‘s why we’re there. Our occupations fuel the insurgency. Think about another country’s military (China for example) occupying this country. There would definitely be an “insurgency” here. 15 of the 19 alleged 9/11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia. I wonder the Saudi citizens would hate us so much? Hmm…
Moment of Clarity
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 4:59amdawgpound … the same could be said about LBJ … 58,148 Americans killed in Vietnam
Report Post »silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 5:09amTrue, that’s no defense of Bush though. Vietnam was also unconstitutional. Gulf of Tonkin never happened by the way. And they ADMIT that. In 1898, the U.S.S. Maine was blown up and America went to war with Spain over. Then we realized, oops they didn’t do this. False flags. Hmm…I wonder if the government has done it besides on these two occasions? Yup.
Rickfromillinois
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 6:49amBush lied…bull. Every single intelligence agency in the world believed Sadam had WMD. He used them against Iran and he used them on his own people. During the months of waiting for the U.N. Iraq sent a convoy of military trucks 21 miles long into Syria. What could have been on it? In addition and most importantly, the reason for the war given to the U.N. for resuming hostilities against Iraq was that Iraq started refusing to allow U.N. inspectors into their country as was agreed to during the cease fire for the Persian Gold war. Also they were firing at U.S./British jets flying over certain parts of Iraq, once again as agreed to under the cease fire of the Persian Golf war. The whole WMD was NEVER the main reason given for resumption of hostilities against Iraq. That was something the Democrats and their will supporters in the media.
Report Post »As for whether or not we are safer, how many attacks did we have after 9-11 during President Bush’s administration? I don’t remember any, please enlighten me.
If you want to attack President Bush for his real mistakes or for things you disagree with fine. Stop regurgitating left wing whacko propaganda. Bush went into Afghanistan and Irag with the permission of Congress. Since they came to the same conclusion he did then all of them who voted for it lied too using your distorted definition of what a lie is.
President Bush was a decent man doing a difficult job during a extremely difficult time. He is also a patriot. Whine all you want about him but the sales figures of his book would seem to indicate that even with all of the accusations thrown at him by the present administration and the Democrats he is still very popular and respected by the American public.
silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 7:02amThe wars are literally unconstitutional. And that’s no left wing whacko propaganda or whatever.
Rickfromillinois
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 7:13amIf the war was unconstitutional I am surprised that the Supreme Court has never said anything about the Korean War, Viet Nam, the Gulf War, and Iraqi Freedom. I suppose it might be because they haven’t had the benefit of the advice of the Constitutional Scholar that is posting here.
Report Post »silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 7:19amAre you kidding me man? Why give me a back handed insult when I‘m trying to stand up for the Constitution even when it’s a Republican who goes against it? The Constitution specifically says we MUST declare war. You can look that up.
Rickfromillinois
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 7:24amRead my previous post.
Report Post »silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 7:34amSigh. I already read it. Read my previous post. You know, even Glenn Beck said in Broke we need to declare wars. Does that change your mind?
Rickfromillinois
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 7:40amI have read all of your posts and gave them all of the attention they deserve. My response remains the same. My response remains the same. Read my previous post, or now it is the one before.
Report Post »silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 7:49amI‘m assuming you’re talking about this one:
“If the war was unconstitutional I am surprised that the Supreme Court has never said anything about the Korean War, Viet Nam, the Gulf War, and Iraqi Freedom. I suppose it might be because they haven’t had the benefit of the advice of the Constitutional Scholar that is posting here.”
Well, what’s your point? Since when have we trusted the Supreme Court to get it right everytime? It also could have something to do with no one challenging all those wars in the court system. I used to think “congressional authorization” was good enough too. Then I thought, we have to be consistent with the Constitution no matter who is in office. What am I saying that’s bothering you so much? You ever think maybe I just want all my friends who are suffering in Afghanistan to come home already? Especially when we’re in an undeclared war? I don’t know what else to say.
Rickfromillinois
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 9:20amI think my point is self evident…. When I was in Iraq the whole “it’s an unlawful war” mantra seemed to only come up when it was a Republican was in office. I don’t remember seeing anyone complaining about Obama supported an unconstitutional war when the article was about him. It seems that this is a very selective problem depending on who is in office. As for no one contesting the wars to the supreme court for the past nearly sixty years, perhaps there is a reason for that, like, I don’t know, they knew they would lose? It seems that these posts are meant to be more of a distraction from the subject then anything else. As for your friends in Afghanistan, are they complaining about fighting in an unlawful war? If so, did they enlist after Afghanistan was invaded? One of the problems of having an all volunteer force for some people is that it is difficult to whine about it when you are sent into combat zone. I remember some “heroes” who tried to get out of the Persian Gulf war because no one ever told them that they might have to fight when they joined the Army. I guess they thought that the M-16 they gave them was in case they were attacked by some vicious rabbits.
Report Post »silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 9:46amNo, they‘re not complaining about fighting an unlawful war because they’re still in. I’m OUT now, so I can complain. We all joined after the wars started. I joined because I SUPPORTED the wars. So I don’t see your point there. I criticize Obama more than Bush so I don’t see your point there. You’re coming off as an @$$hole trying to imply something about mine or my friends’ integrity. All I want to do is go by the Constitution. Nice talking to you.
kryptonite
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 10:42amSilveracer,
I AM offended that a conservative should consider Bush a war criminal. Why are you spewing left-wing hatred against a man who acted in good faith? Himmler was a war criminal, dude. You keep saying that the Iraq/Afghanistan wars have increased international hatred against us. That is a liberal mantra as well. Those who hate us do so because we are (or were) the most awesome and blessed world power ever. It is the nature of man to hate or envy those who do well in life. Also, are you forgetting that it was the jihadists who drew first blood? That Saddam kept trying to invade Kuwait, had burned its oil fields and was not intent on taking over Saudi Arabia and the whole ME? Our self-proclaimed enemies hate us because we are infidels and we support the Israeli pigs. I’ll tell you when the world will start loving us: never. They will dance in the streets the day they see our wonderful country collapse.
As to the constitutionality of the war, If you want to adhere to the letter of the law, then let me put it this way: TECHNICALLY we never went to war with Iraq. It was considered a military campaign/intervention under the War Powers Resolution. So laws were followed and the Constitution was not violated
Report Post »silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 11:12amThe War Powers Resolution is unconstitutional. You honestly think people around the world hate us because we’re free and rich? The CIA teaches something called ‘blowback.’ Our interventionism throughout the world has unforseen consequences that play out later on.
Ex: We funded Osama during the U.S.S.R. occupation of Afghanistan.
We set up the Shah in Iran in the 50′s.
15 of 19 alleged 9/11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia. Most likely due to our prolonged presence there.
Etc., etc.
And once again. I’m not a liberal.
kryptonite
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 12:29pm@Silveracer,
The War Powers Resolution is unconstitutional because??
You know what, Silveracer, your speech places you closer to a liberal than a conservative. I am not trying to bash you. It’s the way you come across. Maybe you are fooling yourself.
Yes, I think the world hates us because we are blessed. I’ve seen it time and again. No matter what we do. You name the bad things — like liberals do — but you forget that never in the history of mankind has the most powerful nation du jour been so freely charitable towards the nations it domintes. Never. We make mistakes, mainly because we are gullible, and also because world power is a shifting phenomenon, and we have to constantly strike a balance to maintain stability in the different regions. I don’t effing know of any other world power who rebuilds the nations it defeats like we did our enemies after WWII. Compare our actions with those of the commies in the countries that fell under their control. No that’s not conservative thinking. Sorry. Merry Christmas, anyway.
Report Post »silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 1:25pmMan, this is really discouraging. I’m not a liberal, I’m a libertarian. And being that I’m not a liberal, I’m not an America basher. I wasn’t comparing our actions to those of communist nations. America is the most generous country in history, both the government and the citizenry. I fully recognize that. My simple point is the War Powers Resolution was unconstitutional because if this country is to go to war, we must declare it. As defined by the supreme law of the land. If you think the world hates us because we’re blessed, you’re truly misinformed. That’s just mainstream media statist propaganda. I’ll pray for you. Merry Christmas.
Report Post »beverlee
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 1:53amMy daughter is getting it for me for Christmas and I can’t wait!!!
Report Post »knotaclu
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 10:19ampicked up my copy bout 30 minutes ago….
Report Post »Psychosis
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 1:51amlol you should see the gnashing of teeth and the pulling of hair on the huff -n- puff lol now thats some entertainment lol poke poke just have so much fun showin them the egg on their faces, and the facts to prove its there lol
Report Post »Reagan/Demint.deciple
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 9:17amlol……
Report Post »Commonsensical
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 1:49amOk, I want to share this link with you… no matter WHO is president, this song needs to be shared… please post it on your facebook/myspace if you agree with the message!
A song about ending generational theft in government!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgNgI_auy2g
Report Post »MrButcher
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 1:49amIf W knew how to drink
he’d know how to think
and talk
better
Report Post »Reagan/Demint.deciple
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 9:13amHuh ??
Report Post »NickDeringer
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 1:37amThis is a major fail for the MSM. In spite of non-stop negative propaganda, Bush has emerged with a respectable legacy.
History will be very kind to GWB. He and Laura have more class than the entire Demunist party combined.
Report Post »Canuck GB Fan
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 7:49amSo true! The left will be seething when they see this. I’m one of the millions who bought a copy. :)
Report Post »Docroxall
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 1:31amDoes this mean that conservatives are 3 times more literate as progressives?LOL
Report Post »Midwest Blonde
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 6:08amYes !!!!!!!!!!!!! :)
Report Post »EP46
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 6:12amAbout a 1000 times more, remember, our ELECTED representatives DON’T READ BILLS BEFORE THEY PASS THEM….BECAUSE THEY CAN’T READ
Report Post »Maybe a new requirement for elected officials should be a literacy test ??? Given in ENGLISH
PubliusPencilman
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 10:17amIrony Alert:
DOCROXALL,
3 times more literate THAN progressives.
EP46,
Please learn how to use punctuation.
It you are going to brag about how literate you are, please try not to sound like a moron when you do it.
tranquilrider
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 2:13pmLmfao
Report Post »Mike777
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 1:29amThat will drive the lefty’s nuts YAY .
Report Post »mark t
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 8:43amYUP you can see that in the response‘s above drive’s em nut’s!
Report Post »HAM to all those libitard wyneycrat’s spewing their vomit here!
BOO HISSS and merry CHRISTmas to all!!!!!!!!
HAM!
silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 8:55amWho you calling liberal? I don’t think you read enough posts.
Reagan/Demint.deciple
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 9:08am@INDEPENDENT..SAYS: Lets cut social service that help Americans and not cut the trillions of dollars we spend on wars. If we spent that money in America, what a country we could really have..
Report Post »Yeah you’d love that socialist paradise, huh ? You know, you can always move to Cuba or Venezuela ?? They have that paradise that you libs always talk about.. BTW , I call ALL independents libs, due to the fact that the all independent congressman and senators always vote with the democratic party so they’re just libs to me..
mark t
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 10:21amYOU Rino!!!!!!!
Report Post »HAM@
mark t
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 10:22amWhy would you be asking????????
Report Post »FREAK
mark t
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 10:27amiNDEPENDANT‘S WOULDN’T KNOW their @ss from a hole in the ground,
Report Post »look at the plat form and see witch principal’s you stand for….
silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 10:29amI’m not a RINO. If anyone is, you are for supporting Bush. What gave you the impression I’m a liberal/progressive/RINO?
silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 10:30amReal mature.
mark t
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 10:46amYou used to support the war’s but not any more? sound‘s just like the wyneycrat’s to me. look it up!
Report Post »silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 11:06amYes, I used to support the wars and now I don’t. Don’t know why that makes me a libera/progressive/whatever. But that’s my opinion, thanks for ridiculing me.
mark t
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 12:52pmYou are very welcome!!! just hope I wasn’t wasting my breath cause Im having soup later!!!!
Report Post »HAM AND POTATO.
Cherished Emblems
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 1:29amGod bless you Mr. President.
Visit:
http://www.cherishedemblems.com/
CatB
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 1:33amLol … that is going to bug old Bill … .if it were the other way around I don’t think W would care .. BUT Clinton — it has got to “hurt” …. good.
Report Post »MR_ANDERSON
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 1:41amI always liked how he took responsibility rather than pushing it on to a former president.
Report Post »(Yes read into that all you want.)
MR_ANDERSON
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 2:26amAdditionally, I haven’t been able to get a copy yet, since the Military Exchange can’t keep them on the shelf here overseas.
Report Post »godlovinmom
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 2:48amI for one miss our last president…he wasn’t perfect…but was a man one could look up to…unlike obama…may God bless America again and bring us a man or woman to bring back America to it’s rightful place again..a land of freedom…a republic and above all a land God can call his own…
Report Post »Esthers_daughter
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 3:54amYou know over the years I have had many people, friends and family as well, that have asked me why I liked George W Bush. Now I have not always agreed with some of his decisions and I have not always liked how things were done at times, but when it comes down to it he was and is a wonderful human being. Anytime anyone has argued with me I have always had one reply that they cannot refute….no matter how much they despise him they can never take away from the effort he put forward to help those in Africa with Aids/HIV. It bugs the heck outta libs that I talk to, but there is no way around that one. As for me personally. I believe he is a caring and generous man. I believe he has a real love for our country and for our troops especially. I also admired his unflinching faith and his willingness not to water it down for the PC crowd. Most of all I believe that everything he did, he did it out of a want to serve us and nothing is more precious then a servant’s heart. Thank you Mr. President
Report Post »silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 4:30amHe’s hardly better than Obama. He start two unconstitutional wars, the DHS, the TSA, warrantless wiretaps, trillions more in debt. Have we forgotten this just because he’s out of office? And GITMO, and TAARP, and etc, etc.
kryptonite
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 5:40am@Silveracer,
Report Post »As I recall it, Bush’s war interventions were approved by Congress, so I don’t see how they can be considered unconstitutional. On the other hand, a federal appeals court ruled that the FCC could not enforce Net Neutrality, yet they went ahead and did it anyway. Only tyrants bypass the rule of law.
silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 5:47amI guess I’m just a constitutional conservative and as I recall it, war was never declared, as is supposed to happen under the Constitution. I used to believe it was legal because “congress authorized it” too, but think about it. We’re going to go occupy two countries for years on end, topple their government, fight their government’s military (at least in the case of Iraq) and not declare war?? And the point is – these wars have not made us safer and harmed our image in the world which has the effect of making us less safe.
silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 5:49amAlso, what about everything else I mentioned besides the wars? People criticize Obama over these things (rightly so) but not Bush?
realindependent
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 6:14amhe lied while in office and lied in his book. Still the worst president ever. You know the one that did 2 wars didnt pay for them. medicare part d, not paid for, bank bailouts, not paid for. What a shame that guy isnt in prison for torture or wire tapping Americans without warrants, or running black site prisons.
You guys impeached a president over a private matter between his wife and himself. In a lame duck session i might add. As well as newt gingrich having an affair at the same time Clinton was having one with monica. talk about hypocrisy from the right. How dare Obama and the congress pass bills in a lame duck congress.. HA HA HA… ho ho ho merry christmas
kryptonite
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 6:17am@Silverracer
Do you think Bush WANTED Gitmo? It was and still is a necessary evil, that‘s why it is still open, even though the Liar officially closed it. TARP was Paulson’s baby. He played Bush big time. I don’t think Bush was perfect, but he wasn’t out to transform America into a commie utopia. We’re headed to the loss of our freedoms. Did you as a law-abiding citizen feel that type of threat under Bush?
How can a country declare war on a tyrant they intend to take out? Saddam was forewarned, which I think was a huge mistake, but the “war” was
Report Post »silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 6:24amYeah, I think he did want GITMO because he thought he could escape the attention of the American public there. The constitution says anyone in our jurisdiction has the right to due process, not just citizens. And no I didn’t feel threatened like I do now when Bush was President. That was also before I woke up.
“How can a country declare war on a tyrant they intend to take out?” Jeez, I guess there was no need to declare war on Germany then. And that’s what the war was supposed to be, but look what it turned into.
This country has abandoned the Just War Theory of Christianity.
Sinista Mace
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 6:31amBush worships Moloch (Lucifer).
DagneyT
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 6:47am@EsthersDaughter, Dittos is an underestimation. You said what I wanted to say, and you said it better than I would have been able to say it!
Report Post »tower7femacamp
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 7:09amI think it’s very appropriate that Bush and Clintons picture are side by side
as both worked for Lucifer and the destruction of America to make way
for the NWO. From my mom’s basement I noticed both parties supported the
The Food Bill, just as both parties support the 2 wars
Sunday by working with Republicans to pass a stand-alone food safety bill by voice vote, sending it to the House. The House passed it 215-144, sending it to Obama just under the wire as Congress prepares to adjourn for the year.
Report Post »http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/21/food-safety-bill_n_799963.html
I see the no Label Conference the hypocrites talked about cutting spending
while Joe Manchin voted every time to support the Food bill
creating yet another money sucking freedom sucking govt agency
They grt on TV with no shame and tell you they are working to cut spending.
Straight from my Cheeto stained hands to you.
signed not a Member of the Bohemian Grove Moloch club.
kryptonite
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 7:11am@Realindependent
Q.: Speaking of hypocrisy, who created rendition and who is currently using it so that other countries torture detainees for him?
A.: Clinton and Obama, respectively.
Q.: Who is losing the war in Afghanistan with his “give ‘em candy” counterinsurgency strategy? Who is letting Pakistan, a nuke country, go to hell in a hand basket with his high-handed military intervention?
A.: Imperialist Obama.
Q.: Who is the clueless Kool-Aid drinker who doesn’t know that Obama extended the Patriot Act for another year?
A.: That would be you, ho, ho, ho.
Ha, Ha Happy New Year when Obamacare will be defunded! ha-llelujah, ha-llelujah, ha-llelujah!
Report Post »tower7femacamp
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 7:12amgot not grt
Report Post »I thought I better beat the spell checkers here.
Forget the story….
guyperram
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 7:23amBush had to put up with a lot of nonsense from the lib’s. Most of the nonsense was just that. Even today there are those with Bush derangement syndrome.
Report Post »For a progressive republican he wasn’t the worst. The only problem is the fact that he was still a progressive.
If you compare him to the current progressive/marxist democrat now in office, the man was a saint.
kryptonite
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 7:36amSilveracer,
My previous comment to you was cut off. Anyway, times HAVE changed. Hitler did not have WMD. Look what we did with our A-bombs, and we were/are the good guys. C’mon, you can’t get rid of a tyrant who allegedly has WMD if you declare war! Let me give you another example. Israel would not have destroyed Iraq’s Osirak nuclear reactor back in 1981 without a stealth operation. Imagine what the world would be like if Saddam had been able to develop nuclear weapons.
You want jihadists caught abroad to be able to lawyer up before they are interrogated? And their lawyers to have access to sensitive intel, if they are tried in civilian courts on American soil? You sure you’re conservative??
Report Post »silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 7:41amHow does declaring war prevent you from taking out a tyrant? Yes, I’m sure. Are you sure?? Why did we just ask each other that?
keithh1981
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 7:42amsilveracer44, that is the problem, everybody does attack Bush on wiretaps, but where are these libs when Obama does it? The Hypricrisy in our country is getting out of control. Sure a democrat can force unwanted Bills down our throat, ram Net Neutrality through when the courts and congress already came out and said it is unconstitutional, and guess, what, Obama is still doing what Bush did in illegal wiretaps. Nobody is really saying a word of this on the left. If the right did this, the left would be going nuts.
I cannot believe you can be so naive and believe nobody is saying anything about this on Bush. Everybody attacks Bush on this but how many people actually attack Obama for this without them calling you a racist for you standing up to the truth?
Report Post »silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 7:45amI wasn’t saying no one speaks out against Bush on these things. I‘m saying why don’t more conservatives? Warrantless wiretaps are inherently a 4th amendment violation. The 4th amendment REQUIRES a warrant.
Cobra Blue
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 7:45amSilverRacer44
Denial is a terrible thing. Believe what want. The truth is the truth. IT mustt be miserable being you.
Report Post »silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 7:50amOkay, the truth is the Constitution requires a declaration. Glenn Beck agrees with me and that still won’t change your minds. Fine, I tried.
Independent Tess
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 8:01amHey, RealIndependent.
Report Post »Clinton was impeached, not for “a private matter between him and his wife”, but because he LIED to Congress, an impeachable offense.
You are falling for one of the most common liberal lies : that he was impeached for the M.Lewinsky debacle.
It was because he LIED to Congress. Try to remember that.
realindependent
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 8:02amkryptonite, never defended obama’s use of it. I think its a war crime actually.
I think the wars in afghanistan, iraq, pakistan, horn of africa, arent doing anything but help the wallets of haliburton and GE and all the military industrial complex.
Lets cut social service that help Americans and not cut the trillions of dollars we spend on wars.
If we spent that money in America, what a country we could really have
Report Post »realindependent
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 8:04amHow many books did Americans for prosperity and freedom works buy and give for free to join and donate to there fraud snake oil selling groups?
Report Post »PubliusPencilman
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 8:21amSorry Silveracer and RealIndepedent, no one here actually wants you to think about stuff. Just be a good partisan lap/attackdog. Have you noticed that half the responses have been just to attack Obama, while not actually acknowledging that they are only attacking for continuing Bush’s policies?
I‘m afraid you’ll learn sooner or later that the Tea Party is ultimately hostile towards real constitutional conservatives (or really anyone who does not toe the line), particularly ones that have a nasty habit of thinking about issues.
Reagan/Demint.deciple
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 8:44amMan, I’m so glad we had a strong republican president in office when 9/11 happened.. Can you imagine if Obama was in office ? WOW ,I don’t even like to think about it..
Report Post »G.W will go down in history as a great American president, maybe not now, but check back in 100 years..
wdg
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 8:55amAMEN! ….Esthers – GW loves his country / No apologies, No we’re bad forgive us, No effort to fundamentally change our great country. Say what you want, GW knows AMERICA is exceptional.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 9:51am@Silveracer
Man, I asked you because most conservatives don’t want enemy combatants tried or incarcerated on US soil!
You might catch a tyrant if you declare war first. On the other hand, he might pre-empt you and nuke you or your allies before you can nab him, or he might flee. Are you denying that the surprise factor gives you an advantage over the enemy? The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was a de facto declaration of war.
Report Post »silveracer44
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 9:55amYou’re missing my point. Ron Paul called for a declaration of war vote, up or down. Because that’s constitutional. We could have still had first strike if we declared war before they hit us. I guess I just need to pray harder that more people wake up.
PubliusPencilman
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 10:19amDear Tea Party-ers,
You cannot attack Obama for being a radical while simultaneously attacking him for continuing the policies of his predecessor, whom you claim to love. It makes you sound stupid and childish.
Sincerely,
A thinking person.
Bluebonnet
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 10:56amI’m very particular about what I read. It has to be entertaining and interesting, not boring like some.
Report Post »For a devoted reader, I highly recommend Bush’s book as very entertaining and interesting and has
caused me to like President Bush even more for what he did (most of which we didn’t know.) There are things he did that really pizzed me off, but after reading this book, I can almost forgive him now. Excellent reading, in my opinion a must buy.
kryptonite
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 11:56amSilveracer,
See my response about declaring war @ChiefGeorge. I am nonplussed, though. If we can attack before we OFFICIALLY declare war, it becomes a de facto declaration of war, so you’re right, I don’t get it. You remind me of Holder interrogating the TS bomber for hours, BEFORE reading him his Miranda Rights. “Declaring war” implies notifying the enemy:
“Thus, a declaration of war served the purpose of notifying the enemy, allies, neutrals, and one’s own citizens of a change in the state of relations between one nation and another. In none of these situations did the declaration of war serve as a vehicle for domestically authorizing war.”
(Yoo, The Powers of War and Peace).
“A declaration of war must be known to the state against whom it is made.” (Vattel, Ibid.)
Report Post »Rn mom
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 1:00pmThere is one simple reason why Bush outsold Clinton- democrats can’t read!
Report Post »Modern Patriot
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 1:25pmThe difference between Bush and Clinton. One had a lot of Class, acted Presidential, showed respect for the people he represented, and apparently sold a lot of books in a short period of time. The other, well not so much of any of those things. Not mentioning any names of course.
Report Post »tradexpertbuysell
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 1:43pmYes, Bush is a very nice big government sort of guy.
But then face it America, we are being “niced” to death. And I too have many warm thoughts about the former Prez and dinosaurs too but I’m sure as hell glad they are no longer around. I wish I could say the same for big government, the IRS, and the FED, although I do not have any warm thoughts about the last three mentioned institutions, and many explative deleted things I could say about them.
Report Post »newt
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 4:26pmi didn’t know it was a contest
Report Post »dontbotherme
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 4:33pmCherished Emblems – I agree with you. God bless President Bush! He loved God, our Country and the American people. And he stood tall for us.
Report Post »free2bme1961
Posted on December 24, 2010 at 7:16pmI pray that some of the gifts that many here receive for Christmas are: common sense, and glasses. If you can find your way to the Blaze, then researching Dubya and his real life, shouldn’t be difficult.
Report Post »While remaining in denial does make life easier; realizing the truth, will make you stronger, and less dependent on liars. Less government, more freedom, and abolishing the patriot act!
Merrry CHRISTmas everyone!