World
Busted! Finnish President’s Husband Caught Ogling Danish Princess Mary
- Posted on February 21, 2012 at 8:49am by
Jonathon M. Seidl
- Print »
- Email »
I think it’s best to present this story without much comment. Here’s the basic outline: Pentti Arajarvi — husband of Finnish president Tarja Halonen — was seated next to Danish Princess Mary during a state dinner in Copenhagen last month. But cameras caught him enjoying more than just the food — and so did Princess Mary:
His reaction once caught, to glance up at the ceiling, is priceless.
Some have speculated Arajarvi may have been just admiring the princess’s necklace. Others believe it’s pretty obvious.
Popular Stories
MSNBC Host Snaps in Heated Segment: ‘What in the World Is Riskier Than Being a Poor Person in America?’ 697 Comments
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 666 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 525 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 370 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 364 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 244 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 254 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order Read More
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 147 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 244 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (341)
SamIamTwo
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:22amHuman nature.
Report Post »MYHEROISRON
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:28amMost hetro men would look down her top. What the hell, mammary!
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:30amYes but he wasn’t just noticing her attractiveness.
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:32amThat was rich, she could feel his eyes upon her. It amazes me still that people do not know there is an unseen connection.
Report Post »Secret Squirrel
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 10:02am.
Report Post »The grass is always greener on the other side of the throne.
I‘m glad he’s still human.
@leftfighter
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 10:08amCan you blame him? She’s smoking HOT!
Report Post »rt elms
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 10:52amSmokin’ HOT and a Princess to-boot! Did you notice where her hand went after the encounter? Checking for a royal wardrobe malfunction, I guess.
Report Post »DerrickJones
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 11:09amHave you seen the Finnish president Tarja Halonen? Well here she is…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarja_Halonen
Report Post »silentwatcher
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 11:11amNice, expensive necklace. Maybe he was gawking at that…….
Report Post »Ari Ben TZion
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 11:26amPrincess Mary – mature but cute.
Report Post »May Clark
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 11:44amThis woman appears to conducting herself with great dignity. Does anyone think for one moment she does not deserve to be written about in this manner and perhaps, as a great lady, she does not appreciate offensive comments. She doesn’t look too happy about the activities of her dinner companion.
Report Post »Mattgolaski
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 12:06pmIf only he was wearing sunglasses no one would know
Report Post »OklahomaBound
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 12:11pmWell at least now we know he’s not from San Francisco.
Report Post »rt elms
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 12:13pmDerrickJones – OMG!!! Did you have to dude??? I now know for a fact, there is someone for everyone!
Report Post »Gorp
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 12:14pmI’m dating myself but.
Report Post »Didn’t Al Jolson sing a song about that?
“Mammary. How I love ya, how I love ya, My Dear Ole’ Mammary.”
It was something like that.
RabidPatriot
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 2:00pmEveryone has jumped to a sexual conclusion. She is absurdly dressed and looks like a royal Christmas tree. I would look at this bedazzled nightmare too. There does not seem to be enough majestic majesty worth the visual climb.
Report Post »its_time_to_arrest_our_government
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 2:04pmnice bobbles hunny!
Report Post »expatinontariocanada
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 2:38pmDoesn’t look like much there. No wonder he was straining so hard to find something. You’d think with all her money she could afford a pair of “bolt-ons”. Just sayin’….
Report Post »2theADDLED
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 2:41pmCould have been admiring her Tatoo !
Report Post »May Clark
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 2:46pmTOMBSTONE & RELOAD,
If you ever knew how old fashioned I am, and how I have truly lived a decent, old fashioned life, and you ever met my upstanding children, you would be mortified to address me in such a manner.
Gaping at anyone is RUDE. It always has been rude. No matter what body part is focused on. No matter how you try to stereotype me, classic manners do not change.
I have never, ever supported women’s rights one single day in my life. I am completely against women’s liberation. I agree with you about disgusting women who dress like tramps in order to get power over men and then want to complain. You are also totally wrong about me not wanting to live according to the rules of the past. I find our sexually obsessed culture to be completely boring as well as revolting.
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 2:51pmDanish Princess Mary is a beautiful woman. I cant blame the guy. But hey, we’re all sinners! “He who Lust for a woman in his mind, also commits adultery in his heart.”
Now for Glenn Beck in HIS OWN words! “You either embrace the constitution or shed the constitution, and Ron Paul is the closest to OUR FOUNDERS, uhh… out of anyone… uhhh…up there” – Glenn Beck
@1:50 in this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zh48angYqoY
“In Their OWN words, In Their OWN words……” – Glenn Beck
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 2:54pmPenitti Arajarvi: “I think your body’s awesome, ya got great…… what’s that on the ceiling?”
Report Post »@leftfighter
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 3:28pm@Cause4Liberty
He‘s also said repeatedly that Ron Paul’s foreign policy is so insane that he’s not endorsing him, and that if Ron Paul can’t manage his own newsletter, he doesn’t belong anywhere near the keys to the White House.
Again- Glenn Beck’s own words.
Report Post »Polwatcher
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 3:31pmHe was paid by Fiat. I was waiting for her to slap him up side the face and grab his tie…..
Report Post »TheLeftMadeMeRight
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 3:33pmOh my dear Ma-a-a-a-ay, you are so, so very right my dear. How how utterly obtrusive.
He conducted himself, dare I say…like an-nnn A-mmmm-errrrr-i-can, oh my my…
God save the Queen…. (BS)
Report Post »Hollywood
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 3:50pmBoy,has he got some ‘splaining to do to his wife!!
Report Post »3monkeysmomma
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 4:10pm@MAYCLARK
All the nice men you knew in the seventies and eighties are “gone”?
Why? Did you “do them in”?
Quick, fellas advert your eyes away from May!
Report Post »I don’t enjoy being gawked at either, but it’s not usually a capital offense!
May Clark
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 4:58pm3MONKEYSMOMMA,
Perhaps you missed the word “OLD” men.
You’re right about me, I’m not an attention whore.
Report Post »WeDontNeedNoSteenkinBadges11
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 5:16pm“Busted! Finnish President’s Husband Caught Ogling Danish Princess Mary”
BUST -ed? LOL (Locals Ogling Lauded)!
Report Post »LouC57
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 5:54pmYes, it really is. Men do this, genetic memory from wayyyyyyy back, checking her out for mating potential.
Report Post »Really. Heck, I’d be thrilled if someone was checking me out–then again it’d probably put them in therapy for years…ha!
Mil-Dot
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 5:56pmAnd, why is this a story on the Blaze?
Report Post »3monkeysmomma
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 6:09pm@MAYCLARK
“I’m not an attention whore”
OK, I’ll bite, what kind of whore are you?
(OK, I know that was uncalled for, but I couldn’t resist!) Oh, just laugh, May…..you know you want to…..
Report Post »JoeE71
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 6:21pmOklahomabound, that San Francisco remark was HILARIOUS! I am still laughing!
Report Post »crackerone
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 6:34pmEncinom and Steelhead, steal glances at Hillary, whenever they see her on T.V.!
Report Post »TunaBlue
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:36pmHe was admiring her “jewels.”
Report Post »Komponist-ZAH
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 11:54pmDerrick—
Ah those leftist women.
“In addition to her political career she had a long and extensive career in trade unions and different non-governmental organizations.
“Halonen is a graduate of the University of Helsinki, where she studied law from 1963 to 1968. She was active in student politics and served as the Social Affairs Secretary and Organization Secretary of the National Union of Students from 1969 to 1970. In 1971 she joined the Social Democratic Party and worked as a lawyer in the Central Organisation of Finnish Trade Unions until she was elected to parliament in 1979…
“Halonen is widely known for her interest in human rights issues. In 1980–81 Halonen served as the chairman of SETA, the main LGBT rights organization in Finland. During her presidency, she has participated actively in discussion of women’s rights and problems of globalization. In 2006, she was mentioned by many sources as a potential candidate for the United Nations Secretary-General selection, but later she stated that she wanted to finish her term as president before thinking about other career options.”
“Rumors have circulated about Halonen insulting and bullying servants and other SDP members, who have anonymously described these alleged incidents.”
With a wife like that, I’d ogle a few princesses, too.
Report Post »Twobyfour
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 1:14amHad to make a witty reply elsewhere, so ran out of the wit. Just some observations.
The man looks quite a ripe age, but has a maturity of a boy. His reaction attests to that. That’s why he married a woman wearing pants, probably.
There are ways to “oggle” that are nearly imperceptible by others and that provide a quite a good take. They also signal the opposite of “boy” on the scale of manhood. Let alone the looking into a ceiling reaction… that really takes a cream. A man wouldn’t react like that.
I like how the princess had a hint of semi-sarcastic smirk after the first flash annoyance. She promptly realized that he’s a boy.
Report Post »May Clark
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 6:44amRoyalty and even American congressional candidates running for election have professional advisers who select wardrobe. This woman was probably told to wear the dress specifically because of the way she can wear all of the royal jewelry with it. She was probably told to wear the jewelry. The jewelry all seems to match the headpiece. Whether anyone believes it or not, this woman is a princess and a classy lady. She is not a pole dancer. It is the old man who embarrased himself by his rude behavior and ill treatment of her. This woman has way more dignity, style and elegance than a majority of the contributors on here. She has done absolutely nothing wrong and it is disgraceful that Americans will get on this site to smirk, yuck it up and crudely write about her body parts as if she is a nobody and a nothing. All women do not participate in vulgar popular culture and they do not deserve to be written about in a deragatory way. You men don’t even get it that your stupid comments are insulting to her and her country.
Report Post »old white guy
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 8:58amshe is a babe. i would be glancing too.
Report Post »Who would Jesus bomb?
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:31amOh boy, would you look at the fun bags on that hose hound!
Report Post »May Clark
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 3:14pm3MONKEYSMOMMA,
Report Post »I presume from your name you are a mother. You might be interested in learning more about the info I am trying to communicate. Here is one article related to this topic of sexualizing the culture. There are many more on this excellent site. http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/2009/10/greatest_genera.html
Lone Wolf
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:19pmThanks a lot, Derrick. Just what I needed after eating supper. Food will not settle for another hour.
Report Post »May Clark
Posted on February 24, 2012 at 11:55amRead first post on sarging at the mall
http://www.pick-up-artist-forum.com/sarging-mall-security-said-they-got-complaints-from-women-vt120179.html
Report Post »Babylonandon
Posted on February 26, 2012 at 9:38pmWhat does anyone expect? His wife looks like Conan O’brien and acts like Queen Elizabeth. Ogling hotties is probably the only thrill he gets in his sex life. Give the guy a break.
Report Post »Meyvn
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:21amHehe… That’s the way it works in the real world. Straight up normal IMHO.
Report Post »mutslie
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:42amHe was looking for the salt’n pepper.
Report Post »MEANS2RESIST
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 11:34amMaybe he was imagining giving her a pearl necklace of his own eh?
Report Post »May Clark
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 12:10pmThis post is to salute all of the nice old men I knew in the 1960′s, 1970‘s and 1980’s. They are all gone now. But, I remember them with great respect. They were nice neighbors you could count on to give you a safe ride home if they passed by in their car. They didn’t curse in front of women. They would not have dared to ogle the little girl who lived next door. No matter what lustful thoughts they had, they had the good sense and decency to keep them private and fight them off. Of course, there was no on-line porno then and no E.D. medicine. May God bless these kindly old gents – where ever they are. They would have died a thousand deaths before they laughingly called their self a pig.
Report Post »Tombstone
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 12:48pmMay Clark
….then along came the ERA, and the bra burners and the women who only want to act and be treated like ladies when it benefits them. One of the problems with today’s women is that they think they can choose who looks at them and when. The whole point of a plunging neckline and a stunning jewel necklace is to BRING ATTENTION to the breasts. You don’t want the attention then cover up. Cause and effect.
Your selective memory betrays you. Do you REALLY want to go back to the 20‘s and 30’s? Really? I’m guessing not. You’d rather pick and choose the behavior that you prefer. Life isn’t like that. Looking at BOOBS are in a mans DNA. Teh man wasn’t being rude, he was just looking.
Sheeeze… and I thought it was only the young women who thought they get to decide who looks at them.
Report Post »ramjet2112
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 1:21pmFang’s for the mammaries.
Report Post »Reload
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 1:22pmWell said TOMBSTONE.
Report Post »2theADDLED
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 4:46pmF.Z. said it best when you are a child you get it right up in your face but when you grow up you can no longer see it all.
Report Post »Testified before Congress.
http://downlode.org/Etext/zappa.html
May Clark
Posted on February 24, 2012 at 12:28pmA Man’s Office
http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/2009/08/a_mans_office.html
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:19amNice necklace , princess.
Report Post »Darla_K
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:24amPerhaps he was checking out her jewelry. Could be……Just sayin’…
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:36amNow that is always a possibility. I’d say he was noticing both.”Wow, look at that necklace, I wonder if those are the crown jewels inlaid?”
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:38amIf he had half a brain he would have commented on her jewelry when she caught him looking. That would have defused the whole situation and covered his a55.
Report Post »On another note she really doesn’t have the great clevage I guess the pickings are slim in finland.
midwesthippie
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 12:53pmSMITH…right on. and typically Royals are boobs…no pun intended. “that’s a stunning necklace your highness” would have been sufficient.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 3:09pmLOL .. he didn’t go for the Tiara!
Report Post »midwesthippie
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 3:34pmseen one tiara…seen them all(?).
Report Post »RebelYell1862
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:18amNice Rack!!!
Report Post »Godfather.1
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:18amFinnish, not Finish. Do you Blaze authors ever proofread your own work?
Report Post »Locked
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:23amArticle hyperlink has yet another spelling error:
busted-fninish-presidents-husband-caught-ogling-danish-princess-mary/
fninish. Hmmm.
Report Post »Ohevi
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 10:59amNo proofreading, just censorship
Report Post »aquablue
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 1:45pmi see finnish everywhere…..unless you caught it in a video. lighten up!
Report Post »bassist237
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:14amOh my, he is human… crazy man human!
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:14amAs anybody can plainly see, he was looking at a fly which had lit on her chest. When she turned around, the fly flew up toward the ceiling and his eyes followed it.
Well, he probably said something like that, anyway.
Report Post »meskew
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:13amClassic!
Report Post »3monkeysmomma
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:12amIt’s going to be cold tonight in Finnland!
Report Post »Dcjones
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:11amHe is looking at her necklace.
Report Post »PPMStudios
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:10amWow! Check out her ‘jewels’….
Report Post »hempstead1944
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:09amA pretty women is a pretty woman is a pretty woman …… even if she is a First Lady.
Report Post »3monkeysmomma
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:25amHe’s the “First Lady”. She’s a princess.
Report Post »ConservDadASD
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:09amI wonder how long be4 someone photoshops this by substituting in Bill Clinton’s head.
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:07am.
Bodacious Royal Tata’s Ogled. Oh My!!!!
If that‘s the worst thing that happens today we’ll be lucky…..
Report Post »Black Conservative
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:10amlol love your comment…I would oggle some princess ta-tas too if they were right there. And you gotta imagine how nice a $1500 royal push up bra would look lol
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:15am.
Report Post »LOL, I was thinking about the Royal Thong…….
wbaranowski
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:06amThat’s what you get when the “First Lady” is someone’s husband.
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:33amSo you‘re contention is that men in power don’t desire women or like looking at women? Some kind of conspiracy thing you should inform us of that excludes heterosexual males?
Report Post »chips1
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 12:25pmChange the seating and put Barney in that chair. Problem solved.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:05amHey Prince Charles, now THAT is what a princesss is supposed to look like. I’m glad your son got the memo.
Report Post »rambosharley
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 11:06amHow true!
Report Post »Harry Assenback
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 11:42amYour suppose to put your hand over your forehead first……
Report Post »JP4JOY
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:05amPictures of a boob looking at boobs.
Report Post »jakartaman
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:03amHe is just a man – we are all pigs
Report Post »It’s just in our nature!
WAR PIGS CRAWLING
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:14amHey,hey,hey……..Oh…..wait, never mind……you’re right.
Report Post »Tandem2011
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:23amTrue. Men are ridiculed for behaving as they’re designed by nature or God. And then women react to men the way they too are designed (with guardedness if they’re not attracted to the man). It’s funny from a distance, but we’ve all been there to some degree, on one side or the other. The intelligent person will try to control such impulses and avoid embarrassment…unless they’re just hopeless cads.
If a woman stares at a man like that and gets caught, she’s usually excused by the double-standard as long as she’s attractive…unless the man’s wife or girlfriend is watching and resents it.
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 10:05amOh please, spare me. There’s nothing wrong with men being attracted to women and “looking” indiscretely. These people have the cameras on them 24/7, eventually you‘re going to see things like this happen if you’re dealing with a straight male. It doesn’t make men “pigs”, it makes them normal and attracted to women. Stop the self deprecation, as *that* is unmanly.
Report Post »May Clark
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 11:42amReally? Do all you Christian men on here believe God designed and created you to be pigs and then rejoice when you act like pigs?
We all want the return of old fashion days when it was safe for kids to play unwatched in their neighborhood. But, no one wants to shut down the incessant sexualizing of the culture.
Let their be decency on earth, but don’t let it begin with me.
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 1:21pmMay, you have already been refuted. A male glancing inconspicuously at a woman is not acting like a pig. Were he not somebody under 24/7 camera monitoring, nobody would have known this happens. Just like when men in the 50′s did it, that you apparently never met but everybody knows existed.
Or was it gremlins who painted those bomber noses with beautiful half or *fully* naked women in world war 2, dear? How about all of those lustful women in painting and sculptures dating from the 1950′s back to antiquity? Your selective sight and memory are quite interesting.
Men like women and we like looking at them. Always have. Proudly. Now get over it.
Report Post »May Clark
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 2:53pmGhostofjefferson,
I do not consider myself to have been refuted. Far from it. All of you men on here, who are so proud of your knowledge of the harmlessness and jolliness of lecherous behavior need to do more research. Try studying Dr. Judith Reismen. She is the conservative expert in this field. After you have learned from her expertise about how the degradation of women is all connected to changing our laws to permit more violence, then we can meet on here and talk again. But, I doubt any of you can get off the porno long enough to seek reality. http://drjudithreisman.com/. Please get on her site now and study some of her research on Kinsey and see how all of you have been conned.
Report Post »BarCalliyon
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 3:47pmMay Clark, are you refering to the Dr. Judith Reisman that believes that a homosexual movement in Germany gave rise to the Nazi Party and the Holocaust, she endorsed The Pink Swastika, which elaborates on this view and has compared modern youth groups for gays to the Hitler Youth? That doctor by chance?
Report Post »TheLeftMadeMeRight
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 3:54pmReally? Do all you Christian men on here believe God designed and created you to be pigs and then rejoice when you act like pigs?
The truth my dear May is that we are all animals. The breasts and hips or rear of a woman are a sign of her ability to bear children and are meant to attract males. SO please don’t hang it on all the men because if you don’t want us looking stop wearing low cut blouses and put on some baggy pants.
Your pissed off when we get caught looking and upset when we don’t want to……women!
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 4:16pm@May
Sorry, I’m not into feminist theory or practice.
I find it interesting that I’ve bothered you so. What I find even more interesting is that you haven’t told me who did the hundreds to thousands of bomber nose art paintings during WW2, since it‘s your contention that men back then were rarified and aparently blind men who didn’t know what women looked like, let alone were able to portray them accurately anatomically. ;)
Report Post »May Clark
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 4:56pmBARCALLIYON,
I don’t know what you are referring to, but here is a conservative link to Dr. Reisman.
Report Post »http://www.wnd.com/2011/12/382673/
May Clark
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 5:05pmGhostofJefferson,
I couldn’t care less about 1940 girly images on planes. What I find objectionable is the immature, disgusting talk on this family, conservative sight by so called conservative men. Here is an article which is worthwhile reading to the very end. http://www.wnd.com/2011/08/338921/
Report Post »Komponist-ZAH
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 5:56pmMay, what exactly do “pedophile rights” have to do with men looking at breasts?
Why does it so upset you that heterosexual males find the female form aesthetically and sexually pleasing? It is sort of what keeps the species going…
Report Post »May Clark
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:47amKOMPONIST-ZAH,
It’s about the links between movements, what or who is driving them and what is the ultimate goal.
Report Post »For example, does anyone really believe the women‘s lib movement wasn’t all part of the plan to destroy this country? To me, it was the greatest hoax ever pulled on women. Here is another link w/ more info which explains in greater clarity. http://www.wnd.com/2011/02/258385/ Thank you very much for taking the time to read the other one. At least you are trying to see things from another point of view. Have a good day.
May Clark
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 3:52pmBARCALLIYON,
Report Post »I think I figured out what you might be referring to. It is not The Pink Swastika, but The Pink Cross.
Here is the link w/ plenty of info.
http://www.thepinkcross.org/page/help-links
May Clark
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 4:09pmInteresting advice for men
Report Post »http://www.charismamag.com/index.php/new-man/sexual-purity/25131-wired-to-admire
red1
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 1:15amMay,
I agree with your objection to lewd talk here but your belief that men could or should be changed is absurd. The only thing that could stop me from looking at women would be if I was dead.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 8:59amI‘m guessing we won’t ever see a story like this about Michelle Obama.
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 9:08amWell thanks for forcing that image on us! LOL, you’re quite right about that though.
Report Post »USPATRIOT101
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 8:59amDon’t ya hate when you waive back at someone only to find out they were waiving at someone behind you?
Report Post »freedomofspeech
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 3:21pmyes, almost as bad as getting caught looking down a womans cleavage line. lol
Report Post »SLARTIBARTFAST
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 8:58amCheck out the tops of his shoes for mirrors, too!
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 8:58amDamn, almost jumped for joy reading the headline on the home page. Then I realized they meant “Finnish” not Finish!
Report Post »flatdaddio
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 8:58amlooks like she’s worth an ogle….
Report Post »flyoverbob
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 8:57amJust admiring the jewels
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 8:54amwith all the obama-carnage in the news, this one just brought a much welcomed chuckle.
Report Post »