Cain Speech Interrupted By Hecklers: ‘Sexual Abuse Is Not Acceptable’
- Posted on December 2, 2011 at 7:07am by
Jonathon M. Seidl
- Print »
- Email »
While delivering a speech at Middle Tennessee State University on Thursday, Herman Cain was interrupted by protesters who shouted “sexual abuse is not acceptable” and “we are the 99 percent!”
Cain responded by not saying much, at one point asking the protesters if they were done and later saying, “I committed to the dean that I’m not going to address any political issues today, but do you know how tempting that is?” The crowd chuckled.
Here’s how it went down:
This comes as Cain admitted his wife did not know about his friendship with a woman who says the two had a sexual affair – or that he was providing her with money.
In an interview Thursday with the New Hampshire Union Leader, the Republican presidential hopeful said he gave Ginger White money to help her with “month-to-month bills and expenses” without telling his wife.
Cain said his wife, Gloria, did not know about any of that until White alleged an affair that lasted 13 years.
Cain has denied a sexual relationship and said he and White were only friends. He said he helped White pay her bills because she was out of work.
He described himself as “soft-hearted” and said White is not the only friend he has helped financially.
In an interview with Sean Hannity, also on Thursday, Cain vowed to “reestablish” his character:
(H/T: National Journal)
The Associated Press contributed to this report.


















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (137)
BeyondFedup
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 9:55amWhat has happened to Herman Cain is so sad, I really believe that the left is behind it. I hope and pray he can keep his family together and can find out who is behind this defamation. My hopes and prayers go out to him and his family.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 10:10amI think Mr. Cain will drop out of the race.
Just this morning, this was published:
Report Post »“Cain told the Union Leader today that his wife of 43 years, Gloria, didn’t know that he repeatedly gave Ginger White — the Atlanta woman who says she had a long affair with him — money for “month-to-month bills and expenses,” and that she “did not know that we were friends,” until White went public with her story Nov. 28.”
SimpleTruths
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 10:16amClassic right wing “blame the victim” position. So in you mind it was White‘s fault Herman couldn’t keep his pants on and cheated on his wife?
Report Post »barber2
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 10:31amSIMPLE: So now the Big Lie is “Herman couldn’t keep his pants on ?” You Lefties are shameless propaganda thugs. Did Barry Soetoro, the student from Indonesia who received student aid at Occidental College, authorize these dirty tricks ? Or was this just his Occupiers of the Blaze ?
Report Post »I.Gaspar
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 10:35am@simplemind:
Report Post »I am afraid you have it backwards there.. It was the libs who demonized clinton’s victims…and they were REAL victims, not just a few broken women egged on to tear a good man down.
You people have very short memories.
GrannyATL
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 10:39amSeriously, Beyond. You don’t get it. Even if the other side chased down White and encouraged her to come forward, the fact that Herman admittedly gave her money regularly to pay monthly expenses and never told his wife about it puts him out of the running for Presidential material. If there was nothing to hide, he would have been happy to let his wife know of his largesse.
You and I both know there was something other than just a friendship going on. NOBODY, no matter how big their heart is, would give someone money every month for 13 years to help pay their bills.
I live in Atlanta and have listened to Cain’s radio program for many years. He’s always stressed that in spite of his poor background he made a good life for himself and his family. He makes no bones about insisting that hard work is the pathway to success. Do you think that he waived that admonishment aside when it came to White? Ah…….not likely. There is only one reason I can think of why a man would regularly give a woman money when that woman is not a relative. She was a kept woman and it absolutely blows Cain’s candidacy apart.
I want a President who has impeccable character.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 10:51amGRANNY: Think you are expecting the impossible of a future male president. The only candidate so far with “impeccable character” is Obama. And that is because his Media handlers have suppressed his records and have the MSM in their liberal hands. ( Soros funds help to grease the way, too. ) Even JFK had some women troubles but that was back in the days before the press told tales…
Report Post »Brizz
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 11:00amMy yard sign will stay up until there is proof that he lied. It would be very disappointing if these allegations were true, but so far it seems to be mostly a smear. It is not right to rush to judgement. Unfortunately, many have already.
Hold everyone accountable!
Report Post »Clinger_Bible
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 11:09amCain had a great interview with Hannity, though there were awkward moments. Then he said this: Let’s not play detectives… ( http://www.thedailycandidate.com/video/2011/dec/cain_play_detective.html )
Report Post »smackdown33
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 12:19pmLet’s not forget that White admits to being a whore for 13 years.
Report Post »wildturkeywatcher
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 1:26pmTo GRANNYATL: I help a lot of people with money; I don’t always tell my husband; he trusts me to do the right thing, and I do the right thing. It‘s not that I’m keeping a secret from him; it’s a matter of his just not being interested in all the people I help. He gets interested if they become intrusive and take too much of my time. Please explain to me why Mrs. Cain should be any different from that. I do not believe any of these women, who are seeking, at a minimum, attention and, at a maximum, money. Gratitude has a very short memory, and people are tempted by that old 15 minutes of fame thing. Don’t let the left win here. Keep an open mind until you see the flame – not just the smoke. Herman Cain is a good man. If you haven‘t read Ann Coulter’s recent column, read it.
Report Post »Badger Patriot
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 1:32pm@simpletruths
Classic right wing “blame the victim” position.
Really?
How quickly you forget Slick Willy!
Old Billy boy and James Carvel tore all his accusers to shreads.
I hope Mr. Cain is able to clear his name but any chance he had for POTUS is gone. I considered him but he lost me on the Libya interview.
Bachmann in 2012
Report Post »TEA
JRook
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 1:49pmAre you serious. Follow his own logic. Why would someone you helped with money come out and say there was a 13 year affair. Particularly when there will be more than just a few instances where their meetings will be validated. And why would he not tell his wife about a friend he was helping out??
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 2:21pmI have no sympathy for a men that work for the Fed.. sorry.. Good Bye Cain. Now the rest of you slaves vote for Newt… cuz thats exactly what they want. morons
Report Post »thecid100
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 2:38pmGrannyatl,
You must be a liberal to say “NOBODY, no matter how big their heart is, would give someone money every month for 13 years to help pay their bills.” I agree that no LIBERALS would do this, but I know many people who have literally given the coats off their backs in wintertime to help those less fortunate. I have seen incredible, unselfish charity from many people I know…but none of them are libs. Sorry your world is so small. Me, I’ll vote for the man who stands tall despite the smear campaign.
Cain!
Report Post »TEA
1389AD
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 8:25pmHang in there, Herman!
This latest round of accusations is completely implausible. A man battling Stage 4 colon cancer will not carry on a “thirteen-year affair” with anyone, and that’s that. Not gonna happen. Back in the day, reputable news outlets would refrain from publishing groundless accusations that obviously conflicted with known facts. That was the difference between respectable journalism and sleazy supermarket tabloids – a difference that no longer exists.
Also see: How David Axelrod and the Chicago Machine Smeared Herman Cain
Report Post »mikellyusabr
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 9:42amI am so disgusted with the media over how they are all smearing Herman Cain I could spit.
Every time you look at the alleged “proof” of Cain’s accusers, there are always big honking holes. But does the media care? Not at all. They herald and pound the smears to death as if they are facts, then sometimes make a sporadic offhand comment about nothing being actually proven to save their butts from libel.
The USA has turned into a nation of petty gossips who love to trash a good man–one who has a long stellar record of achievements and willingness to help others–and trust a whore by default because it makes for a better tale.
That’s just sick.
Report Post »kurwa
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 9:47amhah you brainwashed loons would let cain seduce your daughter and still support him!
Report Post »Fillup
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 9:55amKurwa,
Kurwa masz!!!
Report Post »mikellyusabr
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 10:02amCome on Kurwa,
You can do better than that.
A hard fact or two would be useful.
Are you bothered that the smear doesn’t take like it is supposed to? What’s the matter? The leftie media influence is slipping and that stings?
From what I see, all you’ve got is snark.
I do admit, lefties have got a lot of that.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 10:09amLeftists are just rude, they never protested Bill Clinton , john Edwards, or the murderer , good ole fatass Teddy Kennedy…… Nope, selective outrage is the game…
Report Post »kurwa
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 10:12am@mikellyusabr
what proof do you want pictures? Even Fox and Beck are saying that the latest women is credible. The fact that cain admitted he did not tell his wife about thre friendshiop and the money he was giving her is the proof.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 10:13amWhy have zero women come forward from Obamas past ? Cuz hes gay…
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 10:46am@ kurwa
Fox and Beck said she seems credible, but she could still be false. More information is coming out about her everyday that further discredits her. Hell, the original story said she was suffering a libel lawsuit.
She has even been charged with stalking. Not to mention that the 70 something texts include 47 from her to Cain. Seems a little fishy, especially since evidence of a text sent is not evidence of a sexual nature. Hell, give me you number and I will text 750 texts stating you are a hack. When my bill comes in I will claim we had an affair and show the bill as proof. Does it make it true?
What real evidence do you have that any of these accusations are true? Far as I see it, it is word against word, which is not credible. Until the accusers can supply substantial evidence, I will give Cain the benefit of the doubt.
Funny, Casey Anthony had more evidence against her, but people were willing to claim her innocent (AHEM Geraldo!).
Report Post »mikellyusabr
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 10:48amKurwa,
What proof do I want?
Uhm…
Let’s see what there is.
There are phone records, but how are phone records anything other than proof of communication?
There is a confession that Cain gave the woman money for her bills and didn’t tell his wife about it. But how is that proof of sex?
There is what the leech-lady said, but she is a leech who begs for money. So if anyone offers her a lot of money on the sly to lie about a presidential candidate–and all that fame for later book deals, I don’t see her standing on the principles of truth and integrity.
So how about some real proof?
For instance, how about the content of the text messages?
They will come out, you know.
If they prove Cain was sweet-talking her, I will change my opinion. If they show he was just helping a leeching friend (and all good-hearted people have them), I certainly will not expect you to change your snark.
For now, I trust the man. His history is one I admire enormously. The man is a high achiever, college degree in math, producer of the first order and overall good-guy.
btw – Ain’t I supposed to be a racist for lefties? Ain’t the image of a two-timing oversexed black buck supposed to turn me off so much you don’t need proof? Well, it ain’t working. So what happened? The leftie media got its focus groups wrong this time?
Report Post »GrannyATL
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 10:59amThe only proof you need is the fact that Cain has admitted giving this woman money MONTHLY for years and never felt the need to share this information with his wife. Any man that pays a woman money every month for years and keeps it a secret from his wife has something to hide.
Definitely NOT Presidential material.
Report Post »encinom
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 12:29pmCain is done wiht, whether it is the fact that the Cain Train pulled into too many stations outside of his marriage or the fact that hs economic plan is based on an online game. Cain was a sham from the start and the fools in the Tea Party feel for the con man, hook, line and sinker.
Report Post »mikellyusabr
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 12:44pmI will not condemn “presidential material” on gossip and speculation. My standards are higher than that.
But if speculation is the game, let’s try this one.
Suppose Gloria HATES it when Herman gives out money to people who she thinks take advantage of him. And suppose Herman likes to show her up (so to speak) when people he helps turn their lives around.
Now suppose leech-woman keeps doing with Herman like Lucy did with Charlie Brown and the football–always saying it was different this time and always taking the football away at the last minute.
Just as supposition, I can easily imagine Herman thinking, “If Gloria finds out how much I have helped this woman and she still hasn’t got her act together, there will be hell to pay.”
So Lucy-leech-woman texts Herman that she really really really needs money this time, otherwise the sky will fall, and this time things really really really will be different and she actually will get get her life together. And Herman, like a sucker, digs into his pocket once again, hoping this time will work for her.
Does that sound implausible?
Does that sound “unpresidential”?
It sounds very much to me like presidential material, but it also like a man with too big a heart who does not want to disappoint his wife and catch hell for being a doormat.
Until I get some real facts, that’s my speculation.
Dirty minds–like the entire media class and the folks who agree with them–have another kind of speculation.
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 1:18pm@ encinom
“Cain is done wiht, whether it is the fact that the Cain Train pulled into too many stations outside of his marriage or the fact that hs economic plan is based on an online game. Cain was a sham from the start and the fools in the Tea Party feel for the con man, hook, line and sinker”
I think you mean fell, not feel. Honest mistake. However, 9-9-9 being based on a game? If you mean this:
In SimCity 4, which was released in 2003, residents of the game’s virtual city also lived under a 9-9-9 tax plan (because of the 9% commercial, industrial, and residential taxes)
Ummm…. Big difference there bub. Commercial and Industrial are the same thing.
9% Corporation Taxes
9% Income Taxes
9% Sales Taxes
Where is industrial? Where is the sales tax in SimCity4?
See you are bashing something you don’t fully understand. Also, you are not being fundamentally honest with the community. 9-9-9 is the first step of Cain’s ultimate dream. What Cain really wants is the repeal of the 16 amendment which allows government to cease all income, tax and then redistribute your wage to you. See Government decides how much you get paid prior to you receiving your paycheck. It was the first step to wealth redistribution. It was a Progressive movement that started this, “the wealth do not pay their fair share.”
The government withholds, and 47% get it all back and then some. However, the 47% still feel they paid their taxes. However, they paid NOTHING.
Report Post »JRook
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 1:51pm@mikellyusabr How about the statement that his lawyer made. Not exactly a denial.
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 2:29pm@ JRook
Cain stated that his lawyer prepared and made the comment without checking with him I believe. It was in a Tuesday interview on Fox. Don’t quote me on this.
However, Lin Wood’s remarks are correct. This is not a scandal nor a crime. The relevance of consensual allegations should not be held under public scrutiny. Should Barney Frank’s homosexual sex life be grounds for discussion? So what if Cain is married? What about Clinton? What about Edwards? What about JFK? Does it make them less creditable to hold office?
I understand personal stance with regards to religion. However, Cain is Christian. It is not Christian to judge another on personal things like this. We all sin. Does his private life make him less of a problem solver or businessman?
It may not be moral, but at the end of the day, what rights did he rob anyone of. We have people in office that are insider trading, doing backdoor deals with corporate elites and selling this country to the Communists. I care less if he was getting some action outside of his marriage. What is more important in the grand scheme of things?
Report Post »mikellyusabr
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 3:44pmYou dudes tickle me.
Don’t forget, if you fight for a society where pure gossip can take a man down, you will get a society where it can take you down, too.
I’ll stay with facts, thank you.
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 4:00pm@ mikellyusabr
Well Mike, I am with you on that!
Report Post »Debbie1927
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 9:35amMr. Cain is being set up folks. Wake Up!!!
Report Post »Joe Schmuck
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 9:51amI’m with you Debbie ..
If all it takes are allegations to eliminate a conservative candidate … then Obama is a ‘Shoe In’ for re-election.
Report Post »Joe Schmuck
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 9:56amI’m not saying that Herman is guilty of any of these accusations, but in some way
Everyone is broken. Not EVERYONE can fix this country!
Report Post »GrannyATL
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 10:49amHey, Joe, you’re missing the point. Everyone is indeed broken to some degree or another. It’s how you handle your brokenness that matters. Cain was hostile and openly denied having an improper relationship with ANY woman. Now he admits that he’s been giving this woman money “for her monthly bills” for years and never told his wife about her. That would be the classic definition of a “kept woman.”
Adversity doesn’t build character as much as it reveals character. Cain has shown his true character with this one event. He can’t be trusted.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 11:02amGRANNY: Am sure that Barry Soetoro’s minions are pleased with your reaction to their Cain unproven tsunami of allegations ! They’ll just keep repeating this theme like they have repeated all of their “99%” baloney lies ! Also probably because the Left thinks all conservatives have “black man sex prejudice issues.” The Left is the most prejudiced ( against male, white, southern, ignorant, church goers especially ) and they love to use stereotypes in their media manipulations. And they love to use the Big Lie Repeat It tactic. So be very careful.
Report Post »Joe Schmuck
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 11:48am@GRANNYATL
Are you speaking of Eric Holder, Obama, Barney Frank, Timmy G … etc. etc.? I was talking about Cain, a man who has a successful past.
I’m not justifying any inappropriate action he MAY have committed. … I’m just not going to pronounce him guilty before there’s any proof.
When it comes time for the election, the liberal media is going to dump all over Obama’s challenger and leave B.O. and his very questionable past alone.
Here’s the POINT! We are all broke including Obama. And if the conservatives keep wimping out and let the media form their opinions, then Obama is a Shoe-In for re-election.
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 1:46pm@ GrannyATL
Admitting to friendship is not an evidence of an affair. It still doesn’t look good, I will give you that. However, in listening to Cain in his many responses, he has been quite forthcoming. He is handling this better than I would.
I take it you were never falsely accused of a crime or assault. I have! It is not as cut and dry as you put it. False accusations are full of half truths, as they have to make the story believable enough.
As for not telling his wife, I meet people all the time that I would have classified as friends or positive acquaintances (both male and female). I never told my family about them. Nor am i obligated to tell them everything. It still does not make it truthful that something is happening or I am untrustworthy.
With comments like this, I am willing to assume you are not Christian either. Christ spoke quite profoundly on bearing false witness and judging another. What would Jesus do? You are right, we all make mistakes. However, is this a mistake of judgement on behalf of Cain on a friends demeanor?
I have lost many friends in my life due to their selfish actions and not reserving the same compassion for me that I held for them. See friends love each other. It doesn’t mean they are having sex. Generally it is like a sibling or family member type of love. However, it is extremely conditional. Also, Ginger’s back story shows signs that she is doing this for money. If she could only show hard proof.
Report Post »NOTAMUSHROOM
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 9:16amAny accusations of prior sexually inappropriate activities of any kind were made mute years ago by the Clinton/Lewinski affair. At that time, all we heard from Clinton supporters was, “So what? They all do it! It’s no big deal!”.
OK then. Nothing to see here. Move along folks. This is only a distraction orchestrated by Axelrod/Emmanual et al. Don’t take the bait.
Case closed.
Report Post »NOTAMUSHROOM
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 9:22amMute = moot
Dang spellcheck
Report Post »encinom
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 12:35pmNot a moot issue when you run on family values, when you seek to “defend: marriage from loving same sex couples, while your train is pulling into any station with a skirt.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 2:08pmENCIN: Just the usual : tell a lie and keep repeating it. Hey, dude, we are “on to” to the standard Lefty campaign tactic. Why don‘t you spend some time looking for Obama’s school records? We’d all like to know what is hiding in that “train car.”
Report Post »SCARY313568
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 9:12amI still like Herman Cain but it certainly looks like he’s the quite the womanizer. The twisted left didn‘t make an issue out of slick Willie getting Bj’s in the White House and the affairs that came out afterwards. With Herman Cain it is hard to believe, although not impossible, that he was giving money to a woman for nothing in return. Nothing in life is free, especially the female sex organ.
Report Post »ACLUHater
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 9:18amAbuse? These whores were NOT abused. Abuse is forcing something on these tramps against their will. They had no problem traveling places to open their legs – as long as there was something in it for them.
Report Post »JLGunner
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 9:05amWhere is the proof Cain has done anything wrong? If he’s guilty then lets deal with that. I want facts and if you can’t produce them, it’s time these women be held accountable for their remarks. I know Cain was on his death bed during the time frame of one supposed encounter. I want to know the names of the people who orchestrated this character assassination. I’m sick of politics like this. Whos going to seal the southern border/ Whos going to rid us of obamacare? Who is going to rid us of huge government?
Report Post »I Aint PC
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 9:04amThey must have forgotten about their other favorite president- Bill Clinton- and the sexual misconduct- affair, rape, _______ (insert phrase of whatever you may call it)- that he performed while in the White House. There was physical evidence- a stained dress. Then the other stories of his past arrose from his governorship in Arkansas. They only seemed to praise him more.
Report Post »On The Mark
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 9:01amFalse accusations are unacceptable.
Report Post »Assumption of guilt is unacceptable.
OWS opinions of Cain are irrelevant anyway.
hi
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 8:59amHe will release his own text messages and it will blow over.
Report Post »kurwa
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 9:48amNo it won’t , he’s done, the cain train has had too much lube applied.
Report Post »trueblueday
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 8:56amIf Herman did help this woman financially, because she was down on her luck, if that was all that he did, what does that say about America? Is that what happens when you try to help someone? Currently, we cannot substantiate that anything else transpired. The hate that is bubbling up from the left is palpable. If Cain continues to run, I say he needs to go all the way for a win. If he can win these battles, he can do anything.
Report Post »ADNIL
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 10:46amDemocraps (and some others) have no concept of charity, or helping others when down on their luck.
I guess with democraps, no good deed goes unpunished.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 2:01pmADNIL : With the current Far Left Democrats, I think the only “good” they know is “winning.” The old 10 Commandments have been ditched by this atheist crowd. They look down their elitist noses at dumb crackers who believe in God and go to church ! They believe only in Big Daddy Government !
Report Post »EqualJustice
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 8:35amPaid for by friends of “BLACKS CAN ONLY BE DEMOCRATS” – a NON PROFIT.
Report Post »W@nd@
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 8:35ami think seriously these allegations were paid for by some miscreant entity!
trying to bring down a serious threat to obamas re-election hopes and
certainly lose the ability to use the race card !
you know, given obamas penchant for using race or class warfare
(obama is the pit bull for civil rights er class warfare and civility)
if we can say that, since after all this time,
we know sooo very little of obama’s past! Right?…
for all the world, i think the charges are trumped up and
Report Post »money given to individuals to embelish or even lie for that money!
for the looks of things all of theses women have issues by
delving into their past it is easy to see they could be plyed
with a stipend to embelish or make allegations! hello?
funny none have progressed further..and
soon will be discredited.altogether..im sure
Some of these women might just be a tad unsavory in the first place!
in these tuff times living on the edge might
just might take the money, acuse, and run!
Being assured they will never have to back anything up with, like say, evidence!
i must say mr Cain looks like he would be willing to help people out.
would have the ability to do so maybe even feel an obligation to help
those get back on their feet in life…
I’m thinking this is the thanks he gets for his kindness…
Christians are often used in this way because they are seen as gullible!
I have seen this happen many times!
sempek1
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 8:28amMe media, repub bigs and libs ALL want Cain OUT! Why? He is Ob’s worst nightmare. His candidacy eliminates the class warfare and race cards Ob wants desperately to use. Cain has solid ideas and is a leader. They really want to bring this guy down. I’m not taking the CAIN bumper sticker off my car. Sorry, MSNBC, NBC, – even O’Reilly is counting him out. Come on Herman, fight!
Report Post »chasbronson
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 8:42amOK ,Herman time to quit feeling sorry for yourself.Regroup,reprioritize,and give them hell again.Don’t let them win that easy.This country needs leaders who will face these idiots head on no matter what.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 8:22amJust realized that in addition to the Recall election of Walker, the recent shout downs of Bachmann and Cain, the new ” 99% Bullies, Inc. “ Left is now planning to ”recall” he Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision by holding an announced Occupy the courts for January 20, 2012. Anyone else getting more than a little tired of these mob tactics ? Between Obama’s czars, his War on capitalism policies, and these bully behaviors, this doesn’t even feel like America which used to be “the land of the free,“ not the ”land of the intimidators !”
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 8:05amThey are 99% dumba$$
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 8:19amCain does know a little about temptation, now doesn’t he?
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 9:50amV-MAN MACE I cant say…. I don’t know the man
Report Post »gwssacredcause
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 7:53amI think Mr. Cain deserves the same consideration any other person in his situation would. When you consider Bill Clinton was President at the time of some of his transgressions and look at how the mainstream media treated him. I find it curious that Mr. Cain is attacked on all sides as he is rising in the polls and gaining momentum and yet no one in the mainstream media had the energy or integrity to expose the socialist/communist background of Barrack Obama, even protecting his announcement of his “Muslim” faith. I consider the source.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 8:01amI agree. Think that that is why the Democrats chose this guys. Don’t you wonder just when his school records were “sealed?” Was he groomed for this part ? Very odd. But the fact that he escaped this Trail by Media which has been waged against EVERY potential conservative candidate in these last two elections makes one wonder. The International Left now sues the MSM the way a certain German used his Propaganda Machine : They shield and protect their own while targeting , scapegoating , and destroying their opposition
Report Post »barber2
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 8:23amthat should have been Trial/ uses…sorry
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 8:30amDon’t forget that they deliberately ignore truly viable candidates like Ron Paul while telling viewers that he is simply uneelectable because they say so, especially because he doesn’t worship Israel and thinks Iran having nukes is not as much of a problem as North Korea having nukes (we aren’t blowing up their installations), or Russia and China having nukes.
Nukes are obsolete anyway, weather modification and scalar interferometry rule the day now. But they’re just scary enough to keep people on edge and cause them to rationalize that we must allow preemptive warfare under the guise of humanitarian aid.
And don’t forget to give up ALL of your rights and sovereignty because of the big bad muslim boogeyman who has morphed into every American, and especially any American who owns guns, criticizes the Federal Reserve, are activists, Tea Party members, returning and current veterans, etc.
Be apprehensive of everyone, even your neighbors. During the “Holiday Season”, beware of sharp candy canes, and everyone MUST sit on Satan Claws’ lap and they BETTER enjoy it- a special message from Janet Fearmongertano.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 10:13amV-MAN: Ron Paul seems to attract some of the Far Right wacko anarchists just as Obama attracts the Far Left wacko anarchists. Freedom from Big Government versus anarchy is an important distinction…
Report Post »barber2
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 7:44amThere has been no real proof of any of these accusations: I smell the standard Character Assassination of the Left. Saul Alinsky’s method of destroying your opposition: Target. Isolate. Pressure. Freeze. Destroy. Our little anarchist Marxists have certainly been well “organized” and are all following their radical manuals. ( hear they are soon to target banks and the courts – hope the cops are also getting organized for our 60′s Redo Radicals who are destroying our city budgets with their Camp-Ins the way their old Weathermen “trainers- mentors ” did with bombs in the 60′s ).
Report Post »barber2
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 7:35amGuess the phony “99” human mic thugs are pretty “transparent” in their desire to deny freedom of speech to those whose views they do not like. They prefer to “recall” elections results they do not agree with; Occupy city space at the expense of tax payers; shout down public speakers; and , in general, use any means other than than the previously peaceful methods of the ballot box. Our new American jack-booted anarchists whose model is the rule of the jungle rather than the rule of law. ” Bullies, Inc ” – the real group behind the 99% slogan. They are really 99% Saul Alinsky and his Community Organizing Rules for Radicals on steroids !
Report Post »dalebrendan
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 7:26amWhether he did or not is basically meaningless to me. There‘s hardly ner a president who hasn’t had extra-marital; whateves. He said it right! They are sicking their dogs on him because he is off the plantation and it frightens the hell out of them. What the communists are doing to him, trying to do him, is way worse than anything he could possibly do.
Report Post »HKS
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 7:47amObama certainly is not interested in splitting the black votes with anyone. Yes, he scares the crap out of the liberals as does any conservative woman. Have you noticed that the liberals only weapon is the press?
Report Post »bhohater
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 8:06amYou ain’t seen nothing yet. Keep your powder dry Newt.
Report Post »tweet
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 7:18amI liked Herman Cain, but the fact that his wife didn’t know… well……. that makes me wonder what was really going on and if they were just friends, why wasn’t Mrs. Cain aware considering she was receiving her money as well. I just really don’t know anymore!.
Report Post ».
quicker
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 7:43amI once helped out a girl that had no family ,has there kids and was fixing to have her water turned off and thrown out of her apartment.I have always had a soft spot for single mothers triying to make it without goverment help.Plus I didn`t do it for her ,but her kids.But you never get over the tears and looks of gradituted.And I am glad that I did this as it may one day make me a better person.
Report Post »Winedude
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 7:49amQuicker…I’ve made similar donations to people in help. The difference is that Herman kept his involvement a secret from his spouse, for 13 years! I told my spouse right away…
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 7:52amAccording to Herman, he was helping a lot of people. That’s very believable to me. If he had any discussions about it with his wife, he probably told her “Yeah, I spent $X helping some people who were having financial problems.” without going item by item. Mrs. Cain probably didn’t care to hear the names of each one of them.
Report Post »quicker
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 8:09am@ Winedude shoots I didn`t tell my wife about it.But as she was raised by liberal democrats she wouldn`t understand ,how ever ,after 28 years of marrage she is starting to see the light,and starting to be more conservetive in her thinking.Shoots she has even voted repub the last 10 or 15 years.
Report Post »gwssacredcause
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 9:20am@QPWILLIE and QUICKER You both are spot on. I have sent money to veterans organizations, churches and helped make up the difference in what a child may be short on buying food without knowing the child or the parent. The person receiving the gift never knew my name or has seen me since and I have never told my wife. I try to do it like Glenn said he and his family did for the needy and like the Holy Bible tells us to.
Report Post »ADNIL
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 10:58amWhen I had a job, I too, donated money to various organizations and individuals that I deemed needed it. I considered it my own personal way of “tithing”. Did not tell my spouse or anyone else about it . It was between me and God. (and NO, I was not getting “a little” from the homeless guy).
Report Post »Bailingmyselfout
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 7:15amInteresting how I’ve scanned the entire blaze story list and not one story on how Newt Gingrich has surged to twice the percentage of Mitt Romney, 5 times the percentage of either Santorum or Bachmann. And not one story on the blaze. But some throw away heckling thing is reported. I think the blaze might not be burning with ALL the truth.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 7:54amIt is much more important for the Blaze to report of this type of thug behavior by the Left. We have plenty of time for conservative candidate choosing. If the Left has their way with this type of behavior, there will be NO candidate remaining to run against Obama. Am beginning to think that IS the Democrat campaign strategy: Destroy all potential strong Republican candidates though these strong-armed, thug/ union / bully tactics. Just more of their anti-American political core …Disgusting bunch of anarchists.
Report Post »chasbronson
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 8:35amWhat’s more interesting is on the ongoing Fox news poll is that Herman Cain is still 10% over newt.
Report Post »kcares
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 7:13amThere is still no proof of Cain having an affair. Show the proof before you point fingers. You who are pointing the fingers excused Clinton and Edwards. Just hyprocrites.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 7:19amHe hasn’t even been accused of any “sexual abuse”. The idiots don‘t even know what they’re talking about. Of course they never do.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 7:23amConsidering the number of texts flying between those two, it‘s time for Herman to prove it wasn’t an affair by producing a few of them. If this is all on the up and up, he has access to those texts just like she does, produce them.
Report Post »The Bove
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 7:13amIt was OK for Clinton. What’s the big deal?
Report Post »mccracken
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 7:29amYou were OK with Clinton?
Report Post »barber2
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 7:48amThe Left accepts bad behavior by their fellow Lefties. The Left, however, will not tolerate even freedom of speech for a conservative. Witness the London Murdoch witch hunt . The Left seeks to curb all conservative free speech. Saul Alinsky has an International following of jack- booted disciples.
Report Post »The Bove
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 7:54amNo but they were so I thought it wouldn’t be part of the political discourse any more.
Report Post »Mess23
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 7:12amNo he is being targeted as a sexual abuser?
Report Post »Mess23
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 7:16amMeant to say – Now
Report Post »yougottabekidding
Posted on December 2, 2011 at 7:12amRacist rants.
Report Post »