Campaign Disorganization Puts Santorum Behind
- Posted on March 3, 2012 at 4:30pm by
Christopher Santarelli
- Print »
- Email »

(AP) — Almost as soon as Rick Santorum’s advisers outlined a new strategy for staying on message after he lost to Mitt Romney in Michigan, it was abandoned, a victim of the disorganization that’s marked his campaign and raised questions about his ability to compete against Romney over the long haul.
“They could be much better on discipline,” said Republican operative Michael Dennehy, a top aide for Sen. John McCain four years ago. “They‘ve been very open about their change in messaging after Tuesday’s election. It lasted about 12 hours.”
Romney is almost painfully consistent when pounding his message about jobs and the economy. The Santorum campaign says the former Pennsylvania senator is the lone candidate in the Republican race who has the courage to talk about all the issues – from female contraception to Iran and everything in between.
That’s where Santorum stumbled in Michigan. His team blamed unflattering media coverage but conceded that their candidate suffered from the perception that he was off message when he defended polarizing comments questioning the value of higher education, the separation of church and state, and even Satan’s influence on America. Eventually Santorum lost the state to Romney by just 3 percentage points.
A new approach guided Santorum’s primary night speech. In a hotel ballroom in Grand Rapids, Mich., he began talking more about his working-class background, particularly the women who have influenced him. He explained how his mother, a former nurse who worked throughout his childhood, “taught me a lot of things about how to balance work and family, and doing it well, and doing it with a big heart and commitment.”
The change in message was intended in part to contrast Santorum with Romney, who grew up with wealth and privilege as the son of a governor and auto executive. Widely covered by the media, Santorum’s remarks that night also helped to humanize a man who has drawn fire for questioning the role of women in the workforce and the military. Polling suggests that Santorum’s loss was caused, in part, because Romney fared better with female voters.
“He is always going to have to struggle by responding to misperceptions that are out there,” top adviser John Brabender told a handful of reporters after the Michigan loss became official. “The way that you solve that sometimes is to let people into your life and see a picture of you that you don’t always share.”
It was a strategy widely viewed as smart – and it didn’t last.
As Santorum crisscrossed the country to rally voters ahead of Super Tuesday, talk of his mother seemed forgotten. He offered passing references to his coal-mining grandfather, as he has for months. Instead of a new emphasis on his personal background, he seized upon Romney’s apparent misstep on contraception policy, delivered sometimes rambling speeches about health savings accounts with college students in Nashville, Tenn., and defended Ronald Reagan’s fight against evil during an appearance at a church in Spokane, Wash.
At the American Croatian Lodge in Willoughby, Ohio, Santorum said it was impossible to talk about the economy without talking about the importance of two-parent families.
“Go to the areas of Cleveland where you don’t see any dads. What do you see? Do you see freedom? Do you see opportunity?” he asked during his Friday night appearance. “Do you see jobs? Do you see police? Do you see government? Everywhere. That’s the reality.”
Santorum treats his seat-of-the-pants campaign style like a badge of honor, often mentioning that he doesn’t employ a campaign pollster. Aides marvel at his ability to deliver lengthy speeches and even major addresses while drawing only from a handwritten list of basic points, if any notes at all.
Even he acknowledges his speaking style has its pitfalls, citing as an example his dismissal of President Barack Obama as “a snob” for promoting higher education.
“I used the term `snob.’ You know, it was a – it was a strong term, probably not the smartest thing,” Santorum said. “But you know what? I don’t give prepared talking point speeches written by other people. I got a little passionate there and I used a harsher word than I normally would.”
Republican operative Todd Harris says it’s important – and increasing difficulty – for a campaign to control its message with the rise of super PACs, outside groups, tabloid political journalism and instant news cycles
“About the only thing you can control is what comes out of the candidate’s mouth,” Harris says. “Except when you can’t.”
Rival Romney‘s campaign has seized on another consequence of Santorum’s disorganization: his delegate problem. The former Pennsylvania senator didn‘t file paperwork properly and is eligible for only 45 of Ohio’s 63 delegates up for grabs Tuesday, according to the Romney campaign. Santorum also isn‘t on the ballot in Virginia and won’t be eligible for all of the delegates in several other states that vote after Super Tuesday.
“In a basic organizational test needed to combat Obama, he’s flunked,” Romney campaign general counsel Ben Ginsberg said on a Saturday conference call.



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (67)
SheriS
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 6:14pmUnfortunately for some of you here on the blog, the only person I am hearing with negative ads is Rickie Santorum! Unfortunately for him they are disgusting and gives people nothing but a bunch of ridiculous lies. Rickie is the one who hasn’t a clue what he stands for as he keeps talking about conservative values—he may have the values of conservatives, but most of his ideas are far, far from conservative—-he is a big union man which most conservatives don’t support and the union people are in the bag for Obama. Rickie is just like Newtie—will say anything that will get him votes even if the words are nothing but lies! Neither of them will get my vote!
Report Post »Wolf
Posted on March 5, 2012 at 10:32pmSheris- you are so very right: if anyone thinks Santorum is ‘pro America’, they should check his record on the Constitution and Bill of RIghts… there is no difference between Santorum and the POS currently in the White House.
Report Post »What’s Santorum;s stance on the Constitution? The same as BHO’s.
What’s Santorum;s stance on the Bill of Rights (especially the Second Amendment)? The same as BHO’s.
Changing saddles on a dead horse still keeps you riding a dead horse.
LongRange
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 9:33amThe AP wrote this tripe… It is like every thing else they do. Rick will tale OH, OK, NC, and will be competitive or will others too on Teusday.
Report Post »db321
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 11:00amAmatures, Amature, Amatures – Welcome to your first Presidential Election. Can anyone just wait until Tuesday. This Tuesday is going to be identical to when Reagan (hated by the polls, and the Main Street Media ( however it they weren’t as bad then as they are now) took the race and never looked back.
AP, UP, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, and MSNBC wants Obama to get a second term – so they what Republicans to vote Romney – assuring Obama wins a 2nd term.
After Tuesday – it will be a two man race Santorum and Romney – also remember Texas is not participating in this Super Tuesday – Santorum will win the 175 Texas Delegate from Texas – Why because you have to be a Republican to vote in the Republican Primaries in Texas.
I feel Sanatorium will take the Republican Nomination – making the Drive By Media mad, Democrats Mad and Obama Mad – Americans will be Glad – except for Ron Paul Supporters – nothing can make them happy – they were hoping to get legalized pot out of the deal.
Report Post »Jubie
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 3:31pmit doesn’t matter who wrote it, the facts are the facts. Santorum needs to get his act together. he would have wiped the floor with Romney if he was disciplined and stayed on message. but instead he went out into the weeds and called Obama a snob.
to all those Santorum supporters out there you need to stop blaming his fall on the media, Romney or the 12th phase of the moon. it is because of his lack of leadership that he can’t get all the delegates in OH. it is because of his lack of discipline that he went off into the weeds and said the snob and puke comment.
the fact is that HE is disorganized and it is hurting him.
Report Post »Holaamerica
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 3:48pm@DB321
Report Post »Rick and Newt our a bunch DC insiders trying desperately to to have one last career in Washington. I cant decide who is more disorganized its like they think that running for president let alone against the Obama machine is like setting up a yard sale! What a bunch of Jokes!!!!
Look4DBigPicture
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 5:49pm@DB321…I certainly hope you’re right, because I believe Santorum is the best man for the job.
Unfortunately the non-Romney vote is being split three ways, making it difficult to out vote him. If you take Santorum’s votes combined with either Gingrich or Paul, he comes out ahead. Conservatives need to rally behind one candidate, otherwise we’re going to be stuck with Romney.
Report Post »Wolf
Posted on March 5, 2012 at 10:39pmLongrange- with Santorum’s record on the Constitution, it doesn‘t matter if he’s a candidate or not: if he wins, all we’re doing is changing saddles on a dead horse.
Report Post »Check his record on the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, especially the Second Amendment.
LogicalMetaphysician
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 8:06amPress 1 for “Romney”, 2 for “Not Santorum”, or 3 for “Obama”.
Report Post »Thank you, your choice has been made for you.
NoNannyState4me
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 12:07pm+1 for great humor and unfortunate honesty.
Report Post »merik59
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 1:50amNone of these candidates is ideal but I’m looking for the one who will do the least amount of damage because all our statesmen are gone, folks. There are no more George Washingtons or Abraham Lincolns or John Adams or Thomas Jeffersons. They were uniquely ahead of their time & while I’m sure they had their flaws, they put this country first & foremost. We will never see their like again. Why? Because it takes a special kind of dedication & character & maturity to see it through & none of those guys would condone the type of activity engaged in by our current lawmaker/oathbreakers. Lincoln was a common sense country lawyer & he would be appalled at what is commonly termed an attorney nowadays. Washington was a landowner & general. Adams ran orchards & was well read. Jefferson was a gentlemen & a scholar. All of these men granted that not one of them was better than any other & the very diversity of their skills & talents was what made them successful, not elite. What a concept… That all men of all trades are necessary for a country to be & a nation be successful. Santorum at least comes from similar values even if he does not completely understand that his government record thus far does not demonstrate that he will always do the right thing. If you want to rate them all on that basis, then none of them need apply for the job because not one of them has done right by the people of this nation. Not one & not once.
Report Post »NoNannyState4me
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 12:10pmAh yes, the old hold your nose and vote method. I hope Obama wins in a strange way so maybe a lesson will be learned by the Moron errm I mean Republican party after he completely ruins this country.
Report Post »Wolf
Posted on March 5, 2012 at 10:43pmAh, yes- Santorum is ‘sooooo very much for folowing the Constitution- maybe you’d better check the facts before you start supporting another BHO.
Report Post »merik59
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 1:33amI think Santorum needs to simplify his campaign, but I don’t see him as behind. This is just the primaries & they don’t mean as much as the real deal. I don’t want Romney. I want the real deal, a real American & if the man stumbles a little over his working class values & family loyalties, so be it. At least he has them & can understand the concerns real working people have. I believe the media is out to make him look bad & Romney has some questions in his past he needs to clear up or answer for until you convince me he’s even eligible to run. There’s some question as to the legitimacy of his grandparents to even claim citizen status & he needs to make sure the paperwork is clear & on file before he starts in on Obama for anything. There aren’t any such concerns about Santorum. Romney is too typical of big business politicians in it for their own profit & we don’t need another one of those. We can’t afford any more of those. I know for a fact he’s a crook, so he never had my vote to begin with. He’ll never have it. I‘ll write in Santorum before I vote for any other candidate because I’m done voting someone else’s choice for me. The harder they push for Romney, the more I know he’s not the right candidate for this country. The Bush’s have enough money & Romney’s cronies have enough money. Why don’t they just go live somewhere else & leave the nation to those of us who truly love it & are willing to work to build it up instead of tear it down for profit.
Report Post »Stuck_in_CA
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 7:28am@ merik59 Posted on March 4, 2012 at 1:33am*** There’s some question as to the legitimacy of his grandparents to even claim citizen status & he needs to make sure the paperwork is clear & on file before he starts in on Obama for anything. There aren’t any such concerns about Santorum. ***
Not so:
Report Post »http://networkedblogs.com/sMusy
Look4DBigPicture
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 6:02pmGood point, Merik. Santorum needs something catchy and easy to remember – like Cain’s 9-9-9 or Obama’s Hope & Change. His branding is “Courage” … but he’s not built a memorable story around it.
It sounds like the media is ready to write him off. I sure hope he proves them wrong by making an impressive comeback this week.
Report Post »LightvsDarkness
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 12:38amI hate the part of this article where in it basically states that Santorum is or has been trying to contrast himself as having working class values and being of a working class back ground and Romney came from a family of wealth and privilege. First things first, Romney’s father started from the very bottom (didn’t even go to college) and worked his way up to be a CEO of a company and later a governor. That is an American success story. If I were Romney I would be proud of that, and as a voter I ought to consider the good values that were apart of such a family and therefore the value of a progenitor of said family. And lastly, there isn’t any thing wrong with having material wealth so unless you want to be a class antagonist….. that line of the article should be irrelevant. Other wise join the Marxist Party USA or the Democratic Party.
Report Post »NoNannyState4me
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 11:38pmWell, you gotta blame a false rise and a justified decline on something.
Report Post »Eugene1
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 10:51pmHaven‘t you ever noticed that Santorum can’t look anyone directly in the eyes when he is talking? He averts his eyes every time which is body language for not believing what your are saying or you are afraid to confront someone straight up. This is a character flaw that a President cannot have!
Romney 2012! He can look you straight in the eye and isn’t afraid to tell you the truth or stand up for his beliefs! Anyone who disagrees is selling something!
Report Post »Tigress1
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 10:25pmIf you can’t run a campaign, how can you run a country?
Report Post »NoNannyState4me
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 11:38pmAmen
Report Post »Zoe
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 7:22amSpending ration 7 to 1?
He’ll do just fine……..
Report Post »Todd Decker
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 9:08pmUgh. Now I know why this article irritated me so much — AP. *_*
Report Post »mils
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 10:29pmwhat irritates me is….if snatorum cannot get his act together on the campaigning end now..how can he possibly run, particiapte in a camaign against the media whore obama?…obama is the roiginal pimp with his ladies the media…
Report Post »How could he possibly guide a country?
NONe of these guys will stand a chance against obama unless they get their act together and act like presidential material not bumbling foot in mouth bystanders.
EndTheGOPTEA
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 9:04pm“Santorum Behind”,,,, LOL!!
Report Post »PoliticalType
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 9:00pmSantorum didn‘t qualify for Indiana’s ballot either.
When is enough enough people?
Report Post »Copper Catfish
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 11:52pmRick Santorum IS on the ballot in Indiana.
Report Post »MrKnowItAll
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:56pmI have ONE QUESTION. How can anyone get past ROMNEY CARE? What is wrong with you Romney Supporter’s? There is only one Clear answer here folks. You can’t get past it. So Wake Up!
Report Post »MS-GlenNBC
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 9:25pmAmen….
When Obama gets 95% of the Black Vote you have to say that they are voting for him because he is black…. They don’t care what Obama stands for they support him.
Romney has pulled 90% of certain demographic…. They don’t care what Romney stands for they support him.
A cult of personality type support. We already have a good looking guy who stutters when he talks, as president. Do we really what to give this another go? I want a guy who is ugly and gets the Job done, and not by asking Congress for Money.
Romney got 1 million from the department of education. For what, kids tickets to the Olympics…WTF!
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/exclusive-in-02-romney-touted-d-c-connections-federal-funds/
He even cites money one his colleagues managed to get for the Olympics from the Department of Education.
“She said, ‘Why don’t I get the Department of Education to buy tickets to the Paralympics so that high school and grade school kids can go to the Paralympics?’ She literally got, I believe the number was over $1 million from the Department of Education, funding to buy tickets for kids,” Romney said. “This way we got kids there and we also got additional revenues that we wouldn’t have had. That kind of creativity I want to bring to everything we do.”
Who’s the Progressive? Big Spender? Government Insider?
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 9:27pmMitt Romney is a businessman
Report Post »But our government is not a business – it is a CANCER
Therefore, we need a doctor…Did you know Ron Paul is a doctor?
MS-GlenNBC
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 12:54amNo Kidding..
Bill Gates is also a businessman
Warren Buffett is a businessman
Steven Spielberg is a businessman
Liberal businessmen should not run the country and that includes Romney.
Report Post »Look4DBigPicture
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 6:23pm@soybomb315 … Not a Ron Paul fan, but I have to admit, your comment was clever.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:29pmThe reason his campaign is less organized than Romney’s is because willard has been running for president for 5 whole years
Report Post »blamb61
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:36pmLast time Romney ran he didn’t have the problems Santorum has had!
Report Post »MS-GlenNBC
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:46pmDon‘t you think it’s time ROMNEY stopped running Negative Adds????
i.e. If the Arabs/Muslims put their guns down tomorrow there would be Peace in the Mid East.
If the Jews put their guns down there would be no more Jews.
If Romney stopped running Negative Adds tomorrow there would be no more Negative Adds.
If Gingrich and Santorum stopped running adds to defend themselves or counter Romney’s Adds, there would only be Romney…
Report Post »mjs_pa
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 7:37pmromney lies and freedom dies…..Romney to Obama, 2009: Embrace the Individual Mandate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsX0JB6jsBg
Report Post »MS-GlenNBC
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 12:56amCheck this out…. Romney makes me want to throw up.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/exclusive-in-02-romney-touted-d-c-connections-federal-funds/
Report Post »GoodStuff
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 6:51pmSantorum was never a serious candidate to begin with.
Report Post »SamIamTwo
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:59pmTrue…
Report Post »patspeak
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:54pmA McCain advisor with words of Wisdom for Rick Santorum, really? Yup Michael Dennehy, you sure did good things for John McCain. Where is he now? I’m working hard to be rid of him in the Senate. Give me Santorum any day over the present GOP Presidential contender field!
Report Post »martinez012577
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 6:17pmSo you are for larger government, more undeclared wars, less freedoms, more debt, and no cuts in spending?
That is what Santorum’s record is. He is little Bush, he voted for everything Bush wanted. Obama will destroy his voting record. Santorum stands for the status quo GOP candidate.
Romney – is a progressive who will say whatever needed to get elected.
Gingrich – is a hypocrite and a globalist.
Santorum – is the typical GOP guy running on social issues( even though his record on social issues isnt good) more war(for our safety, blah blah blah) , debt(raised debt ceiling 6 times) and spending( his budget only has cuts to future increases).
Report Post »Hobbs57
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 7:16pmMArtinez, it is dolts as yourself who call Romney a progressive who have no idea what a progressive even is. No offense man, but seriously, Romney seriously doesn’t have the cognitive complexity to be a progressive. HE even said he was one once, having no idea what in the world one was. Progressives are the globalist, the Clintons, Newt Gingrich is a fine example, Rockefeller, and all those who dream up these idea’s which they have determined are the greatest intellectual solution concerning the evolving of civilization. These are men and women who dream up ideas such as population control through efforts presented as helping the people. Always, they are looking to lay down policy‘s and laws which they don’t believe apply to them, but are for us, and seriously believe it is for our own good. A true progressive is a mix between the liberal intellect, the crony capitalist, and the globalist with the sole intention of gaining power and control for their own. But I digress, I assure you, Romney is far to much of a capitalist to be a progressive. Don’t forget, just because Romney isn’t able to talk about his deep seeded commitment to faith( because of the severely negative opposition of certain Christians) shouldn‘t be a signal that he isn’t committed to Christian principals, and this is another factor that doesn’t mesh with progressivism. Lastly, Romney just isn’t that inventive in his thought. He is problem solver not and the inventor of a New World Order.Newt is progr
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 9:54pmHOBBS57
I completely agree with your post. I am getting sick and tired of people throwing out terms like progressive and conservative without the slightest clue as to what these terms mean.
Report Post »Mr. Oshawott
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:14pmIt seems that it won‘t be too long before Rick Santorum’s campaign ends up falling apart like a delicate house of cards. His history of corruption as then-Pennsylvanian Senator, his atrocious voting record, his wanton idea of establishing a theocracy, and, more recently, calling Barack Obama a “snob” for promoting the idea of going to college really has done a serious number on him. From the looks of it, Rick Santorum’s chance of advancing further in the presidential race is astronomical.
Report Post »But then again, since he did fail to file in the necessary paperwork to obtain several state ballots, Rick Santorum really has no chance of winning the presidential race, anyway. Yes, this is the moment in which I actually agree with Mitt Romney, for once (that isn‘t to say that he’ll be getting my vote anytime soon). Therefore, the presidential race is actually between Mitt Romney and Ron Paul, and I already know who to vote for: the candidate who will take his oath of abiding by and defending the Constitution seriously. One of those candidates has a 30-plus-year voting record aligning with the Constitution as proof of his unwavering principles of liberty.
Todd Decker
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 9:07pmWho is this “Ron Paul” you speak of, and how many delegates does he have to make him such a contender?
Report Post »Copper Catfish
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 11:56pmRon WHO? Ron HU? lol
Report Post »Angry Redneck
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 7:28pmPull your head out of your A$$! What are you talking about? If you don’t live here in Pa. then keep your mouth shut about Santorum, he played the game like everyone else in D.C. including Romney, Pual and Gingrich.
Report Post »luckyme
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:08pmformer adviser to McCain, hello!!! hellooooooooo, he lost the elecction! remember mister moderate Michael Dennehy..
Report Post »Rick Santorum 2012 with God in our side there is nothing to fear!
martinez012577
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:26pmYeah, I am sure God is supporting Santorum while he wants to wage war against everyone. Maybe God was on his side while he was running as a pro choice candidate.
Here is your boy Santorum sitting in on Specter’s presidential speech. Here are some highlights of the video with Santorum nodding and grinning like a idiot. Social conservatives, would you sit and support this man(Specter)?
3:46 mark: “In 1996, I intend to win the other house — the White House — with ten commitments to America… including a woman’s right to choose…
13:48 mark: “When Pat Robertson says there is no constitutional doctrine of separation between Church and State, I say he is wrong…
14:31 mark: “When Ralph Reed says a pro-choice Republican isn’t qualified to be our President, I say the Republican Party will not be intimidated or blackmailed by those kinds of threats.I, and millions of other pro-choice Republicans, will not be disenfranchised and made second class citizens.
15:54 mark: “I want to take abortion out of politics. I want to keep the Republican Party focused on the vital economic and foreign policy issues — and leave moral issues such as abortion to the conscience of the individual. I believe abortion is an issue to be decided by women…
16:40 mark: “I pledge to lead the fight to strip the strident anti-choice language from the Republican National platform…”
Remember “politics are a team sport”. Team sports politics got us 16 trillio
Report Post »Nobummer
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:26pmWell said luckyme. It didn’t take long for the establishment RINOs to go back on the offensive. This is part of the endless parade of has-been, re-tread and never-were “experts.” I can’t believe that consultants get paid for their crap opinions. Any non-Beltway American with 3rd grade education could offer better analysis and advice. I am assuming that the left doesn’t start their indoctrination until 4th grade.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 6:08pmFunny, I started losing my faith shortly after Desert storm. I’m trying to get it back, but war mongering religious folks of the big 3 aren’t helping.
Report Post »disenlightened
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:07pmIt’s so nice now that the Michigan primary is over. We’re not being subjected to article after article by the Blaze staff pushing Santorum. They know it’s over for the guy.
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:36pmMaybe it is over for him. Too bad. What kind of “thank you” will Romney give to Newt’s ego for securing the nomination for Romney, I wonder.
Report Post »NOBALONEY
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:05pmTrouble in New Jersey too. With just three weeks left, they decide to collect signatures to get Santorun on the ballot. About 10 days left, and haven’t seen any petitions. Romney won the 2008 primary, but as I‘ve stated before Romney’s strenght is in States that don’t vote Republican in the General Election.
Report Post »disenlightened
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:12pmMaybe Michael Moore and Ben & Jerry can help out? The AFL-CIO can bus in some auto workers.
Report Post »hi
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 4:53pmIf it’s the end, Obama will be elected. If not, He can still put Santorum in place.
Report Post »carbonyes
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 4:45pmSantorum is a good man and could potentially still make a good President, but he had better get his ground game together soon – like yesterday.
Report Post »MCLOVINIT
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 4:45pmPolitical Prayer:
Report Post »“It is January 20th, 2013.
Rick Santorum is being sworn in as the new President of the United States.
I give thanks to you Almighty God, for your blessings! Thank you, Lord.”
I see it. I feel it. I believe it. It is so.
ShyLow
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 4:55pmGod loves to monkey-paw…so careful what you pray for
Report Post »disenlightened
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:09pmDon’t ya just want to rub her head?
Report Post »CatB
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 4:40pm“They could be much better on discipline,” said Republican operative Michael Dennehy, a top aide for Sen. John McCain four years ago.
Oh goody more advise from the McLame campaign .. just go away !!!
Report Post »ModerationIsBest
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 4:44pmWhen will people learn that the reason that McCain lost wasn’t because he was too moderate?
Report Post »CatB
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 4:52pmHe was to wussy.
Report Post »