Politics
Blaze Chat Live Transcript: Candidates Face Off in Iowa Caucuses
- Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:42pm by
Scott Baker
- Print »
- Email »
Below is a live stream from Iowa via CBS:
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 670 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 525 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 386 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 365 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 327 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 255 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 263 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 115 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 147 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 255 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (153)
jlcook
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:35pmWell 22% reporting and a 3 way tie, what do know, Paul may not get this, come on Ricky!
Report Post »deac0n
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:42pmjust remember ricky is not pro second amendment
Report Post »deac0n
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:45pmJust remember Rick is refusing to tell gun owners in Iowa where he stands on important Second Amendment issues.
Report Post »Bonnieblue2A
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:30pmWe know Romney is anti-gun from him signing the Mass. AWB.
Report Post »MAC12ME
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:41pmCan someone out there give a definitive on Rick’s stance on 2nd Amendment? Thanks
Report Post »Uranium Wedge
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:12pmHoly crap! Any one of these candidates would be 100000000 times better than Obama..
Report Post »junderwood
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:21pmIf you want to know what Rick Santorum’s stance is on gun rights, you can go to his website and find out – http://www.ricksantorum.com/defending-2nd-amendment-rights
Get the info from the “horse’s mouth”, so to say…
Report Post »GoodStuff
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:24pmWho cares? All these candidates suck!
Allen West, please save us from these clowns!
Report Post »jaclyngregory
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:09amGoodstuff, you mean the Allen West who just voted for the NDAA?
Report Post »CatB
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:34amI just heard Santorum PRAISE those who “cling to their guns and (I believe he said) bibles” (Obama I believe said religion when he MOCKED US) anyway .. he doesn’t sound like someone who wants to take away the 2nd ammendment!
Report Post »CatB
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:35amAllen West who also voted for the Pigsford scam??? He has a lot of explaining to do.
Report Post »Calcman
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:28pmAnyone who isn’t for Ron Paul is a dimwit with no understanding of the Constitution, human nature, good vs evil, what is wrong with the country, or what got us in such a hole. For those dunces who disagree with Paul’s foreign policy, go ahead and continue to spend trillions placing our best young men overseas getting ambushed by rock-throwers while we let in all of the hundreds of thousands of terrorists and teach them chemical bomb-making and how to fly but not land planes.
Report Post »fcbs46
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:49pmWhy on this earth would anyone vote for a senile 80 year old man to run the country. He should go rock his chair and cuss at the blacks (he so dislikes) going by.
Report Post »lel2007
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:50pmGood Lord you Paulita’s are obnoxious.
Report Post »Fearnone
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:51pmPlease enlighten me CALCMAN, what is Ron Paul connection with George Soros? It seems we already have one of those already in place in the White House.
Report Post »wyofiddler
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:51pmOH HO! I see so if we disagree with you then we are “dim wits”?! oh ya that sounds like freedom of speech HA you claim to support the constitution and then degrade anyone who disagrees with you, Well pal this guy voltaire (big influence on the founders) said “I disapprove of what you say but will defend to the death your right to say it” now does that sound like your previous comment (”Anyone who isn’t for Ron Paul is a dimwit”) is upheld by one of our founders’ favorite philosophers?
Report Post »manjodad
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:52pmAnyone not for Ron Paul is a dimwit? Anyone for Ron Paul is a nitwit!!!!
Report Post »CatB
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:55pmA Ron Paul supporter calling names .. I am shocked .. not .. don’t you have anything else?
Report Post »ThePaul
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:55pmCorrection: *The person who votes for Ron Paul is a dinwit. 1st:” because he is old! Really OLD! He will die in office if he gets elected.
2nd: He says and I quote. “Iran is not a threat” he also said “it’s are fault for 911″. Which is completely WRONG!
3rd: If he wins the caucuses he will NOT win! If you would put him on the same stage with Obama; who is one of the greatest speakers of all time, he will get creamed!
We NEED someone who can beat Obama. Not a someone who does not change with the times.
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:22pmRon Paul is an acceptable candidate. He is pro Constitution. Paulies; grow up if you want to help the pro Constitution movement that Ron Paul supports. If you want to call names and help Ron Paul; call Obummer names. It will go a long way. try it.
Report Post »RationalMan
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:25pmCalcman stated;
Report Post »Anyone who isn’t for Ron Paul is a dimwit with no understanding of the Constitution,…..
***********************************************************************************************************
First of all, what happen to “Constitutional Republic”? Constitution and Constitutional Republic, has two different meaning, did you know that?
Veritas Libertas
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:32pm@ThePaul: You should source your quotations or you could be held liable for defamation or slander.
Also, though somewhat factually accurate, have to call SPT/F2 alert on Calcman’s original inflammatory remarks. The dviceive comments are the mark of a provocateur.
Report Post »Doctor Nordo
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:43pm“We NEED someone who can beat Obama. Not a someone who does not change with the times.”
Translation: we need a progressive.
…
Report Post »woodrowsux
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:53pmRON PAUL has at least been tacitly endorsed by Sarah Palin and that’s good enough for me. Paul/ Paul presidency and to hell with Karl Rove.
Report Post »RationalMan
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:27pmWhoever the winner is, key point is to remove Obama and his thugs from the White House!
Report Post »db321
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:35pmYea, beat Obama and Legalize Pot – Go Ron Paul.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:36pmExactly …OMG .. Obama MUST GO! Anyone but Obama!
Report Post »CatB
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:54pmObama .. in the White House….
http://www.mrconservative.com/2012/01/obama-keep-your-feet-off-our-furniture/
Report Post »RationalMan
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:07pmdb321
Report Post »Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:35pm
Yea, beat Obama and Legalize Pot – Go Ron Paul……..
**************************************************************************************
To bad RP didn’t come up with this idea! (Legalize Drugs).
Do you know who did?
Ironbalut
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:31amWrong…the key point is to elect the BEST person! You are going to see a lot of independents and libertarians sit out this election If another neo-con wins the republican primary.
Report Post »samuelwcordrey
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 2:16amIRONBALUT You say that the point is to elect the BEST person and then tell me that a lot of libertarians will sit out if a softy by your standards is nominated. So i guess you think Obama is better than a softy. so if your guy gets it afterward what will be left? Margett couldn’t fix England because of healthcare, and your guy will fail too if we can’t eliminate it this election. Don’t cut off your nose to spite your face. Sour grapes is a lousy way to run this election.
Report Post »deac0n
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:26pmAll I know is this country is bankrupt adding a trillion dollars to the debt every 6 months. I could critize Ron Paul easily , but who else is running that is willing to do the hard stuff to actually save the country. Do you think congress and the bankers will let go of their power ? As long as we have income tax congress will always be able to buy their way out of any trouble they have caused. this will go on until there is nothing left and who is going tobe around to pick up the pieces ?
Report Post »chances are it will be the marxist labor unions and you know where this will lead. I do not see any other choice but to vote for Ron Paul, no one else except maybe Perry will do much with the debt.
DesdemonasCrew
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:23pmHere is a clue. Paul as a member of Congress never got anyone to support any of his hare brained schemes. What is his record? 1 for 600 bills presented? You think if he was president that anyone in Congress would all of a sudden approve of his positions? You are not thinking clearly! The President does not legislate.
Report Post »Hah!
Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:27pmAmen Deacon. Those are great rational thoughts. I am just about there too.
Report Post »Veritas Libertas
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:40pmAh ha, but the President can sign into law or veto based on Constitutionality. It would mark a return to the separation of powers, and I don’t think Dr. Paul would rule by executive order or a series of departments and their czars.
Report Post »deac0n
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:40pmDeaqr DesdemonasCrew I became a partial quad almost 15 years ago and since then i have put most of my time into studing economics and politics. I am so afraid for this country , I see unless drastic measures are taken we will go down the same road as the roman republic. if that is what you want keep voting for the same old stuff like clinton both bushes or obama. We will, unless drastic measures are taken, never see prosperity again.
Report Post »abbygirl1994
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:26pmIs it over, all I see is people mulling around bs ing???
Report Post »bobbie22
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:23pmNow watching Carl Rove on FOX, now I am not, changed channels.. When are they going to get rid of that bag of hot air.
Report Post »jlcook
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:20pmQuite honestly I would vote for a burnt waffle over BO, Paul may get our house and economy on track, infact I believe his the man for the job, I just can’t see pulling all troops home and being an isolationist nation, we have made to many enemies over the years. Whats the easiest way to kill alot of people, get them all in one place, I find his internationl policies very dangerous, besides I don’t think Iowa will matter I doubt Paul ends up with the nomination.
Report Post »RDG013
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:18pmTonight is Ron Paul’s Super Bowl. It is all downhill for him from here. I am going to get a good laugh if Santorum steals Paul’s only chance for a state victory tonight.
Report Post »dealer@678
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:14pmI pulled up the tweets Rupert Murdoch said about Glenn. I think he’s worried that Beck could destroy Fox. He just might be right
Report Post »RDG013
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:19pmGlenn Beck has gone almost as bonkers as Ron Paul as of late. He has lost his credibility while pimping for Bachmann and it is going to be hard for him to gain it back.
Report Post »jlcook
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:27pmBeck is not pimping anyone, he likes her, everyone likes someone else for different reasons I still like three different ones, I’ll take Becks objectivness over any journalist any day, even though he is merly an opinion guy, I like Bachman alot I just don’t see her getting through BO, and the left media.
Report Post »dealer@678
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:28pmRDGO. Stay tuned you dam idiot. You’re gonna witness things that will blow your peanut sized brain
Report Post »RDG013
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:38pmSorry jl, but when Beck started intentionally taking quotes from other candidates out of context to try to prop up Bachmann he lost me. He has some work to do to gain his integrity back now.
Report Post »lel2007
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:42pmIs Glenn Beck running for office? Why would anyone other than Murdoc care what happens to FOX? Glenn has his own gig now. Watch or don’t watch, it’s you free choice.
Report Post »dealer@678
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:44pmAnd one other thing. Beck has S E Cupp and Amy Holmes. 2 of the hottest babes on the planet working for him
Report Post »db321
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:44pmRD – I don’t know how old you are, but I will make a prediction that Glenn will be the most influential person in America in the next 3 to 5 years – it is not Glenn – it’s his dream.
Paulies, need to reconsider – I heard an interview that Paul said that with Legalized Pot comes mandatory employee drug testing – the National Legal Organizations pleage that all auto accidents will require mandatory drug and alcohol testing for all Auto Accidents. In 10 years, most Paulies will be in jail and to think they voted for their own demise – that makes them bigger useful idiots than Obama supporters that wanted free heath care.
Report Post »Doctor Nordo
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:50pmS.E. Cupp is a “6” at best.
Report Post »ssingh1515
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:13pmRepublicans and Democrats: your corruption ways are about to come to a close.
Report Post »RationalMan
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:42pmRight on, this time American people are not going to roll over, especially for the “Republican Establishments”! Rove and others, we are not listing to you anymore….get over it.
Report Post »SamIamTwo
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:52pmThe live chat is BS…censored.
Report Post »GroundZero is Nuclear Demolition x3
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:18pmAbsolutely, they didn’t like all the RP supporters. Then alt candidate comments were made.
Report Post »We see clearly who the MSM doesn’t support this election, just like we could see who they did support last cycle.
Hobbs57
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:18pmNo doubt. It is hilarious because people ‘s comments are on there stating how impressed they are with comments on the Blaze and how civil the comments are. This is only because they censor the comments. Haha
Report Post »Hobbs57
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:43pmI wonder if there is anything attached your profile when being signed in and making comments ?? Last chat I posted 8 or 9 times and never got placed in the chat. I tried 2 times so far today and haven’t been posted.Actually, I tried 4 more times now, making a total of 6 and not a single comment published. I seriously am considering cancelling my GBTV account. I am wondering if the Blaze represents where I line up politically anymore.
Report Post »Hobbs57
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:55pmMake that 9 comments, no posts- pathetic
Report Post »kralspaces
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:52pmRegardless, It’s Ron Paul for me. Good luck GOP.
Report Post »Fearnone
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:11pmAccording to Glenn Beck: Ron Paul co-chaired a defense plan committee with Barney Frank in 2010 which consisted of 14 people and 11 of them were directly George Soros people. Are you sure this is the guy you want to bring us back to our Constitutional Republic?
Report Post »KTsayz
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:33pmFearnone – that story was bull***t and Glenn knows it,
The Sustainable Defense Task Force was formed in response to a request from Barney Frank, working conjunction with Rep Jone (R-NC), Paul (R-TX) and Sen Wydan (D-OR) to explore possible defense contributions to deficit reduction efforts that would not compromise the essential security of the US.
The Task Force members served as individuals.
The Huff Po piece didn’t even mention Ron Paul. Greenfield wrote a hit piece that Horridwitz ran with all sorts of viscious innuendos to attack the good Doctor.
Suck on that for awhile.
Report Post »Fearnone
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:08amNo, KTSAYZ, you can suck on some reality and facts. Here is a list of the “committe” individuals and their affiliated orgtanizations. Check out the Soros-funded ones and happy sucking to you.
Report Post »Carl Conetta, Project on Defense Alternatives
Benjamin H Friedman, Cato Institute
William D Hartung, New America Foundation
Christopher Hellman, National Priorities Project
Heather Hurlburt, National Security Network
Charles Knight, Project on Defense Alternatives
Lawrence J Korb, Center for American Progress
Paul Kawika Martin, Peace Action
Laicie Olson, Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Prasannan Parthasarathi, Boston College
Miriam Pemberton, Institute for Policy Studies
Laura Peterson, Taxpayers for Common Sense
Christopher Preble, Cato Institute
Winslow Wheeler, Center for Defense Information
Sr Newk
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:40pmI heard Glenn’s chat with Michelle Bachman, and I was waiting for Glenn to ask about her Iowa campaign manager or assistant manager. Michelle told the press he left for more income, and we find later that what Michelle told the press wasn’t the real story. So Glenn I will ask you, if you can accept without question her answer regarding her managers, then you are definitely better than I at believing her story without further discussion. My problem is if Michelle can make a such a statement running as a candidate then can we really trust her if she were to become President. Glenn it is really up to you if you want to get her clarification on the story on not, because it is your show. I realize you don’t have all of the day to ask everyone’s questions, but the loss of state campaign manager and then the assistant manager who was just promoted to be her replacement campaign manager isn’t a small item. Now both of them have left her campaign.
Report Post »WAKEUPUSA2012
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:47pmExactly. People think this is a person who can lead the country? A liar? No thank you.
Report Post »Fearnone
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:15pm“… and we find later that what Michelle told the press wasn’t the real story.”
And where is the source that verifies this statement that she lied?
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:31pmShe has just really proven to be a real moron so much of the time and on more then one occasion lied. We already have that in the whitehouse now.
Report Post »lel2007
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:38pmAre campaign managers committed to a cause, or do they make their money getting people elected? Both managers bailed in hopes of catching a winning wagon, thinking Michele was a loser. What kind of answer were you expecting from Bachmann?
Report Post »Unix
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:39pmAnyone but Obama in 12, and retake congress, turn this ship around with the best we have, unite conservative and libertarian and independent…!!!!
Report Post »SamIamTwo
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:56pmYou got that right…these contests are nothing…OMG…Obama Must Go!
Report Post »RationalMan
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:04pmI agree, anybody but Obama!
As for Congress, we must get rid of that cry baby Speaker of the House…He’s a wimp!!!!
Report Post »gdbhusker
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:38pmthis chat is rigged, all the Anti-Paul statements are all just talking points that are unfounded, have been de-bunked, and really just classless… I am a devout Christian who despises drug use, to say that I support paul because I want drugs is idiotic… Paul says it is NOT a federal issue, it is a state issue and he is RIGHT!!!California votes overwhelmingly for legal marijuana and the federal gov raids them and punishes them….so..is it the will of the citizens in each state or the over all power of the federal gov upon it’s people that should rule?? I would never live in Cali, but I think those that want the type of laws there should be able to live freely according to that STATES rules..peace
Report Post »David11
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:41pmThe fact of the matter is, Ron Paul simply wants to restore the Constitution, but the majority of people in this country have been so brainwashed that they don‘t believe in it anymore and are willing and wanting to change it simply for their own agenda’s….never going to work nor happen. Go Ron.
Report Post »THXll38
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:57pmI agree — the majority of Americans are not ready for a true constitutional conservative. It seems, in my humble opinion, the majority of Americans say they want change, but in all due honesty, they want to keep the status quo.
Report Post »David11
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:35pmLock the weakminded neocons out – Don’t let them vote – Go Ron Paul – Ron Paul is the best and most sane person in Iowa right now.
Report Post »David11
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:30pmAnd as expected Ron Paul is up by 3300 votes….OMG
Report Post »David11
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:37pmPaul 5380 votes to Romney’s 1290 – Ron Paul is going to win easily.
Report Post »unsafe
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:52pmWhat are wrong with these ppl voting for that moran
Report Post »jlcook
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:55pmHoly crap if Paul wins the nomination we are as cooked as we are with O. sorry Paulies its a fact this guy is off the deep end on to many things.
Report Post »searching for the Truth
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:29pmOur Military has been actively teaching villagers how to dance to ease tensions in the Middle East. However, argument has ensued with members of the families of the Taliban and al-Quada over gender roles while dancing – each argue, to one another, that one is not submissive enough. Fights have evolved. So, I suggested square dancing instead. How say each of you?
Report Post »KeithOlberdink
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:28pmRon Pauls tin foil hat gang are working on the re-election of Barry Hussein Obama
Report Post »LibertarianForLife
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:38pmAnd your supporting four years of the same if your supporting anyone else.
Report Post »piper60
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:41pmPaul has some attractive principles, but he comes across as a bit…..cracked.
Report Post »people4people
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:43pmMaybe when your standing at the gates of hell for selling your soul you might awaken! Ron Paul is the only candidate with Integrity. I will not compromise my liberty any longer!
Report Post »Veritas Libertas
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:50pm@Piper: That’s largely because of media coverage and our soundbite mentality. Dr. Paul’s economic and foreign policy are quite a bit to in depth for a 10 second snippet. That’s why the media (the blaze included) run with headlines and entire stories about “truther” allegations without researching the facts. It’s quick and easy to say, “Paul says U.S. To blame for 9.11.” It’s quick, it catches attention, bit it’s a half truth. Further reading shows that Dr. Paul was referring to reports from the C.I.A. regarding the reasons for the attacks.
Here’s the most horrible thing about such halfassed “journalism” in modern society, when you are bombarded with information that initial perception is all that registers for many. You’ll note lengthy and passionate explanations by Paul supporters that follow these types of attacks not as a defense but as clarification. This, I believe, is a purposeful attempt to draw atention away from the truly important issues we should all be discussing like the debt and foreign policy.
The fourth estate has gotten lazy in this technological age and it is left to each of us, individually, to verify accusations leveled.
Report Post »WAKEUPUSA2012
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:28pmGood luck to all the candidates!
But freedom is on the rise. Ron Paul, even if he doesnt win the nom, we still win by injecting real issues. Dont go with the NDDA unPatriot act supporting(which is everyone but Paul) go with freedom. Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »David11
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:32pmWe have about 60% of college kids out here from all of Iowa, the kids are the one’s that are going to decide this race….Congrats Ron Paul.
Report Post »Romney-Rubio 2012
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:14pmThe full coverage of the Iowa Caucus via Fox news is at: http://url2it.com/lcbl
Report Post »Lazaryss
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:12pmModerators having to approve every comment do not a live chat make.
Report Post »gogogoff
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:27pmI must agree, they would not even post half my posts, and none of it was trolling..
Report Post »valarie
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:05pmPlease don’t let any of our best guys “Perry” this Caucus!!
Report Post »drago
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:21pm“Perry” this caucus, huh?
Report Post »Wtf does that mean?
HawkEyeTx
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:52pmMark J
Report Post »San Antonio, Tx
Now on line with all y’all.
valarie
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:44pmLet the best Conservative, American person win!
Report Post »cgnick
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:47pmAs opposed to a conservative non-American?
Report Post »lel2007
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:48pmUnfortunately, that rarely happens.
Report Post »