Chopra on O’Reilly: Says Atheist Dawkins Uses His Scientific Credentials to ‘Camouflage His Bigotry’
- Posted on November 2, 2011 at 10:58pm by
Tiffany Gabbay
- Print »
- Email »
During an interview on Fox News’ “O’Reilly Factor,” Bill O’Reilly and guest, spiritual self-help guru Deepak Chopra, discussed religion and spirituality, particularly as it relates to staunch atheists like Richard Dawkins.
O‘Reilly juxtaposed Chopra’s new book, “War of the Worldviews: Science vs. Spirituality” to Dawkins‘ recently released children’s book on evolution, “The Magic of Reality: How We Know What’s Really True.”
At one point in the interview Chopra, agreeing with O’Reilly, accused Dawkins of being emotionally reactive and of hiding behind his scientific credentials to “camouflage his bigotry.”
Mediaite adds:
“So what do you say to a guy like Dawkins?” O’Reilly wanted to know, before asking if Chopra had ever spoken with Dawkins face-to-face. “Oh, yes,” Chopra replied. “He ambushed me when I was at Oxford. He used a subterfuge. Channel 4 called me, said ‘We want to do an interview,’ I went to the interview… and it was him!”
O’Reilly had one question: “Why didn’t you kick his butt?”
Chopra later added that he believes Dawkins uses his scientific credentials to “mask his bigotry.” The men also agreed that Dawkins (and presumably others of his stripe) often resorts to — highly unscientific — emotional responses to discussions rather than simply relying on fact and logic.
Watch the interesting exchange below:
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 670 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 527 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 388 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 366 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 327 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 260 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 268 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 125 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 147 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 260 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (155)
grudgywoof
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 6:06amI really rather pity Mr. Dawkins. He is like most of the OWS people in that he only wants to allow his views and won’t even consider others even thought they are reasonable. Listening to him speak is like finger nails on a chalk board.
Report Post »nelbert
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 6:39amWell stated. Were Dawkins less strident, his argument would seem more reasoned.
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 9:19amIs it Dawkins or Darwin?
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 11:35am“They aren’t angry at God, they are angry at the institution and that the vast majority of Christians do not practice what they preach.”
oh I thought the atheists, who ALWAYS think they’re the smartest people around, would realize that people are fallen and sinful….we’re not all perfect like you atheists are.
” Those are the people that are/were truly never part of the Christian faith. You could call those people “the 99%” haha”
the arrogance of you little gods, to judge another’s soul, when you know nothing about it…
sounds like you were just too much of an a-hole to be around….
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 11:46amoops wrong thread…sorry
Report Post »RabidPatriot
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 12:07pmThe more advanced science gets and the more we know how advanced and intelligent everything is put together, the less likely it is that the universe is just some accident started by nothing. Darwinist atheism is like paganism. The more we know the dumber it is.
Report Post »Cesium
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 2:32pm@joe “oh I thought the atheists, who ALWAYS think they’re the smartest people around, would realize that people are fallen and sinful….we’re not all perfect like you atheists are.”
Pretty presumptive statement. Another great example of black and white thinking by a bible thumper. Plenty of holier than though faithful as well. Not to mention what you said about people are “fallen and sinful.” That is severely a christian sentiment. In Jewish perspective we do not accept ourselves as full of sin, and especially not from birth. We may sin but as I said, we don’t accept it! We acknowledge every year that although we have tried our best not to sin, we are not perfect and we do sin at times. At Rosh Hashannah you throw your sins away and ask for forgiveness and pledge to make the effort to be better than the year before.
Report Post »Christian and muslim= sinning and death Judasim = Personal improvement and life. There are lots and lots and lots of atheist that do not by any means consider themselves anywhere close to perfect. Ridiculous
joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 3:00pm“Pretty presumptive statement. Another great example of black and white thinking by a bible thumper.”
hey gomer, I was pointing out and mocking black and white thinking by one of you would-be-god athiests…no surprise you’re not clever enough to get it…now don’t you feel foolish?
” Plenty of holier than though faithful as well. ”
well post your examples gomer….you prove my point for me.
“Not to mention what you said about people are “fallen and sinful.” That is severely a christian sentiment. In Jewish perspective we do not accept ourselves as full of sin,”
more black and white thinking on your part I see.
“We may sin but as I said, we don’t accept it! ”
yeah its always easier to blame someone else….
“There are lots and lots and lots of atheist that do not by any means consider themselves anywhere close to perfect”
can’t tell it from their words…..
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 3:10pm“Christian and muslim= sinning and death Judasim = Personal improvement and life. ”
this is just insane…Jesus died for us…I would say get a clue, but its painfully obvious in your case its not possible…
and since you think christians are like muslims, why don’t you go live in the lands of islam, and proudly proclaim your judaism??? hmmmm????
Report Post »kmichaels
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 4:59pm[nelbert
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 6:39am
Well stated. Were Dawkins less strident, his argument would seem more reasoned.]
Very true nelbert. In a sense, you could call Dawkins a Fundamentalist Atheist. Or perhaps an Extremist Atheist. Both fit him well. Then of course he is also a money-grubbing atheist. He is not exactly not in it for the money.
Report Post »kmichaels
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 5:29pmDawkins has hit upon a pretty nice gig, really, if you think about it.
He makes pretty good money and is treated by a celebrity, called upon as an expert witness to preach to the itching ears of liberals.
And he does not really have to put much work or intelligence into what he says. He has an arsehole sort of character/personality and he just has to make up a few not so clever sayings and he has it in the bag with 19% of the US citizens.
Pretty nice gig and fairly easy money.
Report Post »kmichaels
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 5:31pmSorry for the typo above. I meant that Dawkins was “treated as a celebrity”.
Report Post »dwilco77
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 4:09amI am a Christian. I have four years of Undergraduate education in Chemistry, and Biology, and seven years of post-graduate education in science, and have spent the last 20 years in a science related career. I have no animosity towards atheists. That is their choice. What I find difficult to understand is the intense anger that atheist have towards people of faith. Is there some explainable rational thought behind their animosity, or is it something outside of themselves that drives them, but they have no understanding of that force.
Report Post »kcares
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 6:14amGod is Love, Jesus is Love and without Love in your life, you only have yourself and that would make me angry tooooo.
Report Post »searching for the Truth
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 7:43amThat‘s what it’s all about.
Report Post »searching for the Truth
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 7:45amSpiritual warfare.
Report Post »searching for the Truth
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 7:52amNo. They love their car. They love their dog. They love KFC. But, that is misplaced love. One has to love God more.
Report Post »SecularConservative
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 7:58amMost Atheists in America used to be Christians. The “hate” stems from abuse from other Christians. I used to be angry too. I am not angry anymore because I forgave them. If Christians would take more care of their own there would be less Atheists.
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 9:12am“Most Atheists in America used to be Christians. The “hate” stems from abuse from other Christians.”
oh poor dear, do tell us about all this horrible abuse….let me guess a cute christian girl turned you down… abuse, right what BS.
” I used to be angry too. I am not angry anymore because I forgave them. If Christians would take more care of their own there would be less Atheists.”
you were never part of us….else you wouldn’t have become an atheist.
Report Post »SecularConservative
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 10:02am@JOE1234
Thanks for reaffirming my point :)
Report Post »stockpicker
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 10:39amMatt 10:22, Mark 13:13, Luke 21:17
Report Post »SecularConservative
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 11:20am@STOCKPICKER
But it doesn’t seem right that being hated by all men includes fellow Christians. I would arrange the annual Prayer Around the Pole at my high school and very few would show up. The few that did were mocked and alienated by the rest of the so called Christians that belonged to various youth groups around town. In the end I left the faith because of my own internal reasons but I‘m trying to enlighten those that don’t understand why people that call themselves Atheist are angry. They aren’t angry at God, they are angry at the institution and that the vast majority of Christians do not practice what they preach. Those are the people that are/were truly never part of the Christian faith. You could call those people “the 99%” haha
Revelation 3:15–17
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 11:32am“@JOE1234
Thanks for reaffirming my point :)
”
oh yeah I was just brutal to you…poor baby….didn‘t mean to hurt snoogum’s feeling….
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 11:47am“They aren’t angry at God, they are angry at the institution and that the vast majority of Christians do not practice what they preach.”
oh I thought the atheists, who ALWAYS think they’re the smartest people around, would realize that people are fallen and sinful….we’re not all perfect like you atheists are.
” Those are the people that are/were truly never part of the Christian faith. You could call those people “the 99%” haha”
the arrogance of you little gods, to judge another’s soul, when you know nothing about it…
sounds like you were just too much of an a-hole to be around….
Report Post »SecularConservative
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 11:54amI wouldn’t say you were brutal… My feeling were never hurt nor was I trying to hurt yours. You are showing everyone here your hate. Very Christ like…
1 John 3:15; Matthew 5:22
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 12:29pm“I wouldn’t say you were brutal… My feeling were never hurt nor was I trying to hurt yours. You are showing everyone here your hate. Very Christ like… ”
oh yes I’m SO filled with hate…and you are so wonderful, holy and perfect…right….
you atheists are SUCH victims…poor things…you’ve only slaughtered a hundred MILLION or so in the last century…sniff…I know you wanted to kill SO many more…..
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 12:30pm“1 John 3:15; Matthew 5:22″
oh and I LOVE it when you athiests use scripture…so Alinsky of you! and of course you know who old Saul dedicated his book to, right? same one you serve….he knows scripture too!
Report Post »SecularConservative
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 1:07pm@JOE1234
Are you getting flustered!? hahaha
Report Post »justin.blake
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 1:22pmGotta watch out folks…if you don’t have the version of Christianity Joe holds to, you will be excoriated and ridiculed. Joe, can you, for once, just lay off the mean-spirited rhetoric? You really think that your approach will convince a proclaimed atheist to change his mind? Secular just shared why he drifted away from his faith, as many do from time to time in their struggles to find roots for their belief. For some people, it takes a long time to get there. Their path is not your path, and to ridicule someone for their struggles is decidedly un-Christian. His/her experience with Christians who do not ‘walk the walk’ is all too common. Unfortunately, you exhibited some of that behavior today in your response. Why don’t you act Christian seek some forgiveness for your rash response? Or are you so firm in your belief that its your way or the highway that you don’t have the courage to examine your own behavior and make a change to be more like the Christ you claim to follow?
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 1:59pm“@JOE1234
Are you getting flustered!? hahaha
”
the devil that proud spirit, hates to be mocked BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 2:11pm“Gotta watch out folks…if you don’t have the version of Christianity Joe holds to, you will be excoriated and ridiculed.”
nice lie. its more like if you call yourself a christian, and are not, like you’rea mormon or JW, then I disagree and set out to prove you’re not. amazing the amount of real hatred I’ve gotten from those gods of the salt lake.
” Joe, can you, for once, just lay off the mean-spirited rhetoric? ”
oh whats mean spirited about what I said? this clown blames christians for his atheism…right, he’s just a victim….sure…..maybe its time he stopped being such a passive-aggressive wimp and took responsibility for his own actions…don’t you think?
“You really think that your approach will convince a proclaimed atheist to change his mind? ”
do you think anyone on a message board will change someone else’s mind? LOL this clown is playing games, and playing you for a fool……in your case its not so hard….
Report Post »SecularConservative
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 2:23pm@JOE1234
I don’t blame Christians for no longer believing in God. I would appreciate it if you didn’t put words in my mouth. I was just trying to say that most Atheists that are angry tend to have a past with Christians or have been a Christian themselves.
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 2:24pm“JOE1234 is either a “forum troll” or he is very very young…”
amazing how easily I made you look stupid isn’t it?
you athiests aren’t nearly as clever as you think you are.
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 2:30pmI don’t blame Christians for no longer believing in God. I would appreciate it if you didn’t put words in my mouth. ”
oh really, so explain what you meant when you said:
“Most Atheists in America used to be Christians. The “hate” stems from abuse from other Christians. I used to be angry too. I am not angry anymore because I forgave them. If Christians would take more care of their own there would be less Atheists.”
and this:
“But it doesn’t seem right that being hated by all men includes fellow Christians. I would arrange the annual Prayer Around the Pole at my high school and very few would show up. The few that did were mocked and alienated by the rest of the so called Christians that belonged to various youth groups around town. In the end I left the faith because of my own internal reasons but ”
oh yes your ‘internal reasons’ are very obvious.
“I was just trying to say that most Atheists that are angry tend to have a past with Christians or have been a Christian themselves.”
if you were a real christian, you wouldn’t have left the faith. and your blaming christians for being mean to poor atheists is a laughable case of projection……you atheists are the most hate-filled abusive group around…….remember columbine? I bet you think those poor atheists were justified in murderering christians, given you logic.
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 2:48pmoh yeah now I remember you justin…
“And furthermore Joey-o…all the mormons I know realize that they cannot ‘work’ their way into heaven.”
why don‘t you have the guts to admit you’re a mormon? are you ashamed of your faith? I wasn’t even talking to you, but then you came in to a thread attacking me…and defending your fellow gods…oh yes you were SO loving to me…..LOL
maybe you should show me what it is to be loving, since you’re SO good at it…LOL
Report Post »testoboost
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 3:57pmWhat you just said also applies to Liberals. I would venture to guess that all atheists are Liberals.
Report Post »amtsoundsmith
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 4:46pmWow Joel1234, if your the type of “Christian” that makes it to heaven then sign me up for hell.
Report Post »justin.blake
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 4:50pm@Joe – let’s see here….to answer your question “oh whats mean spirited about what I said?” I will use your own words…
Report Post »“you were just too much of an a-hole”…“hey gomer”…“have you made your animal sacrifice to your racist bloodthirsty god darwin today”…”you atheists are SUCH victims…poor things…you’ve only slaughtered a hundred MILLION or so in the last century”…”amazing how easily I made you look stupid isn’t it? you athiests aren’t nearly as clever as you think you are.”…
If that isn’t hate-filled rhetoric, I need a new dictionary. You act like you come from this position of majesty and power where you hold the magical wand of all truth and dispense your wisdom to mere mortals as you see fit. What you really are is the whited sepulcher and when we pull off the lid, we see the hypocrisy and bigotry inside.
In regards to the other post, no I am not afraid to say I am Mormon. I tried to frame my statements independent of any religious affiliation to get you to open your eyes and see how bigoted you were sounding, without having the fall-back position of anti-mormonism to cloud your logical processes. Of course you just continued with your blanket ad hominem attacks, hasty generalizations, along with a string of other logical fallacies that led others on this forum to wonder (and rightfully so) whether you were just a troll, or a very young person with little education. Try framing an argument without name calling and use some logic
kmichaels
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 4:57pmJoe1234 is certain that he is saved, and is just as certain that mormons are not saved. Which makes me think that Joe1234 is not really saved at all, at least, not the way he thinks he is.
Joe1234 are you guaranteed a spot in heaven?
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 5:50pm““you were just too much of an a-hole”…
yeah thats most likely the truth in this case…since he’s complaining about christians being SO mean to him…I’m sure you would have been SO much nicer…but then who is holier-than-thou??
“hey gomer”…“have you made your animal sacrifice to your racist bloodthirsty god darwin today”
in Cesium’s case…gomer is being nice….and if you haven‘t guessed he’s a crazed darwiniac, he‘s even threatened me because I’m not a big fan of the theory of evolution….
when it comes down to it, I don’t care if you think thats mean spirited or not…perhaps you should grow up and stay out of adult conversation.
looks like you can’t tell the difference between scorn, sarcasm and hatred….but hey its so much easier to throw that typical left-wing talking point out isn’t it now?? don’t forget to call me bigoted, racist and homophobic too…
“”…”you atheists are SUCH victims…poor things…you’ve only slaughtered a hundred MILLION or so in the last century””
you think thats hate-filled? thats the ABSOLUTE TRUTH…what the hell is your problem?
“You act like you come from this position of majesty and power where you hold the magical wand of all truth and dispense your wisdom to mere mortals as you see fit. What you really are is the whited sepulcher and when we pull off the lid, we see the hypocrisy and bigotry inside.
”
oh good I KNEW you’d call me a bigot you left-wing wac
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 5:55pm“If that isn’t hate-filled rhetoric, I need a new dictionary. You act like you come from this position of majesty and power where you hold the magical wand of all truth and dispense your wisdom to mere mortals as you see fit. What you really are is the whited sepulcher and when we pull off the lid, we see the hypocrisy and bigotry inside.
”
oh yes you gods of the salt lake are SO judgemental aren’t you now? you think you‘ve become a god already haven’t you? why don’t you take the log out of your own hate-fille bigoted racist eyes before you take the spec out of mine, you holier-than-thou hypocrite?
you have the same scorn and disdain for me that I have for people like cesium, who have richly earne it…I never threatened you, nor did I say a cross word to you, before you attacked me because I disagree with mormons calling themselves christians…hypocrisy much??
“In regards to the other post, no I am not afraid to say I am Mormon. I tried to frame my statements independent of any religious affiliation to get you to open your eyes and see how bigoted you were sounding”
here we go with bigoted again you racist liberal wacko…..so tell me why you would join a church that didn’t allow blacks the right to become priests until the 1970s hmmmm??
‘bigoted’ ‘hate-filled‘ those are things uttered by people who don’t have the intelligence to make an argument…..they’re almost always liberals, uneducated and easily led…
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 6:09pm“Joe1234 is certain that he is saved, and is just as certain that mormons are not saved. Which makes me think that Joe1234 is not really saved at all, at least, not the way he thinks he is.”
you’re not the One making that jugement…I know how much you wann-be gods want to make the judgements though…..
“Joe1234 are you guaranteed a spot in heaven?”
I have faith in what Jesus did for me…how about you? oh an my Jeus is the uncreated God of the universe…no gods before, none after…yours?
have you been baptized enough, done enough good work? you sure??
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 6:16pm“”…“have you made your animal sacrifice to your racist bloodthirsty god darwin today”
oh and I know you’re going to say, given your amazing ignorance of history, that darwin was just a sweet old man and his theory is just science….
evolution is racist and eugenicist to its core…..even the title of cesium’s bible is…
On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life
favoured races…hmmmm…I wonder if brigham young would know what those favoured races are..
•”Shall I tell you the law of God in regard to the African race? If the white man who belongs to the chosen seed mixes his blood with the seed of Cain, the penalty, under the law of God, is death on the spot. This will always be so.” (Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, vol. 10, p. 110).
Report Post »darthtyran
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 8:55pmThe Bible states that there is a measure of faith unto all men. That means that men cannot separate the GOD or Spirit side of their being. Most atheists have issues with Chrisitanity because it states absolute right and wrong. The Bible condemns premarital sex, extramarital sex, sex with children, homosexual sex, sex with animals, theft, robbery, adultery, murder, false witness, liars, and so forth. These are thing people no days like to do and they dont want to be condemned for it. They want unhindered praise and acceptance for their actions. Since Christians will not capitulate to this whim the atheist and some pagan religions, attempt to alay their guilt by clamining there is no god. Some, like Dawkins, have become so militant that they fabricate evidence under the guise of science to back their claims. I guarantee that if there was no money in atheism Dawkins would be totally unheard of. Either way he is irrelevant. He is not going to change my mind. The Bible also says the only the fools says there is no GOD.
Report Post »investlite
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 3:50amI always find it funny when atheists want to argue with the religious. It’s like a frenchman and an englishmen arguing in their native toungue. neither one understands the other. Even if they know the language they don’t understand the customs.
Report Post »SecularConservative
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 12:17pmAmen! :D
Report Post »Kaoscontrol
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 3:24amAn independent movie called “Conversations with God”. It ended up being not so good as a movie.
Report Post »truth-seeker2020
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 3:21amIn Florida, an atheist became incensed over the preparation for Easter and Passover holidays and decided to contact his lawyer about the “discrimination inflicted“ on atheists by the constant celebrations afforded to Christians and Jews with all their holidays while the atheists had no holiday to celebrate. The case was brought before a wise judge who after listening to the long, passionate presentation of his lawyer, promptly banged his gavel and declared, “Case dismissed!”
The lawyer immediately stood and objected to the ruling and said, “Your honor, how can you possibly dismiss this case? Surely the Christians have Christmas, Easter and many other observances. And the Jews — why in addition to Passover they have Yom Kippur and Hanukkah… and yet my client and all other atheists have no such holiday!”
The judge leaned forward in his chair and simply said “Obviously your client is too confused to know about or to celebrate the atheists’ holiday!“ The lawyer pompously said ”We are aware of no such holiday for atheists, just when might that be, your honor?”
Report Post »The judge said
“Well it comes every year on exactly the same date– April 1st!”
“The fool says in his heart, ‘There is no God.” Psalm 14:1, Psalm 53:1
kcares
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 6:19amThat was good, sent to to others to read!
Report Post »JAMACAMECRAZYMAN
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 11:06amExcellent
Report Post »UrbanCombatSurvivor
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 3:16amAtheism is a cult, and I have never found a single person who could logically debate otherwise.
Report Post »WingedAnomaly
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 3:33amChristianity is a cult, and I have never found a single person who could logically debate otherwise.
Report Post »WingedAnomaly
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 3:37amOkay, first things first.
Wikipedia defines ‘cult’ as the following:
“…in current popular usage usually refers to a group whose beliefs or practices are considered abnormal or bizarre.”
Your statement is immediately invalidated because Atheists have no ritualized beliefs or practices.
Christianity, however, features a ritual wherein you symbolically eat the flesh and drink the blood of a Jewish zombie while telepathically saying you accept him as your master. Sounds a little bizarre to me.
Report Post »schmite123oh
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 8:54am@ winge And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables? 11He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given. 12For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath. 13Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.
you do not know what you say, seek the lord and he will reveal himself to you. Hide from the lord and he will hide from you.
Report Post »schmite123oh
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 8:57am@wing We are seperated from God because of Sin, and therefore face judgement,repent, accept Christ, and he will by no means forsake you.
1From whence come wars and fightings among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members? 2Ye lust, and have not: ye kill, and desire to have, and cannot obtain: ye fight and war, yet ye have not, because ye ask not. 3Ye ask, and receive not, because ye ask amiss, that ye may consume it upon your lusts. 4Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God. 5Do ye think that the scripture saith in vain, The spirit that dwelleth in us lusteth to envy? 6But he giveth more grace. Wherefore he saith, God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble. 7Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you. 8Draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to you. Cleanse your hands, ye sinners; and purify your hearts, ye double minded. 9Be afflicted, and mourn, and weep: let your laughter be turned to mourning, and your joy to heaviness. 10Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord, and he shall lift you up.
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 9:13am“Your statement is immediately invalidated because Atheists have no ritualized beliefs or practices.”
oh sure they do….they rejoice in killing unborn babies.
Report Post »SecularConservative
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 12:04pmJOE1234 is either a “forum troll” or he is very very young…
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 2:55pm“JOE1234 is either a “forum troll” or he is very very young…”
looks like the truth hurts…you atheists are the most bloodthirsty group around…hell the muslims can’t even hold a candle to you…
Report Post »justin.blake
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 4:58pmSince when does not having a belief in God make you bloodthirsty? It’s as if you are trying to draw the conclusion that all atheists are pro-abortion. Is that the case here Joe1234? And how do you arrive at the conclusion that “the truth hurts” when a poster simply questioned your age or trollish behavior? Then you proceed to call non-believers more bloodthirsty than muslims. Someone else…can you help me out here??
Report Post »kmichaels
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 5:14pm[WingedAnomaly
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 3:37am
Okay, first things first.
Wikipedia defines ‘cult’ as the following:
“…in current popular usage usually refers to a group whose beliefs or practices are considered abnormal or bizarre.”
Your statement is immediately invalidated because Atheists have no ritualized beliefs or practices.]
Nice try but you sort of um, added the word “ritualized” to a definition that did not include it. Atheists do tend to have common beliefs and practices. And many people consider atheist beliefs bizarre.
Report Post »kmichaels
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 5:38pm[justin.blake
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 4:58pm
Since when does not having a belief in God make you bloodthirsty? It’s as if you are trying to draw the conclusion that all atheists are pro-abortion.]
Good question justin. Let me take a crack at it. First off, I have plenty of atheist friends. None of them to my knowledge are blood-thirsty. I do believe however that they tend to be mostly pro-choice. Not that they would call themselves pro-abortion. They do get irritated with that label. However, still, I think that them being pro-choice does lead to more abortions but that is a side issue.
The other issue of being blood thirsty would apply to the infamous atheists that we are familiar with. Not that that means anything much, but it is true, historically, that the worst mass murderers were mostly atheists. Especially if you count just the numbers of people killed. Stalin, Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, and I would also includ Hitler in that category, granted that that statement would be more debatable.
However, in wrapping things up, I would not say that US atheists are correctly labeled generally blood thirsty. But then, they are just as wrong if not more so if the call Christians blood-thirsty or war mongerers, which they do tend to claim more frequently than I like.
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 6:00pm“Since when does not having a belief in God make you bloodthirsty? ”
looks like you need a history of the 20th century 101…amazing ignorance….did you miss the 150 MILLION or so slaughtered by atheist regimes in the 20th century?? stalin ring a bell…Mao…the killing fields…..hello is anyone home???
“It’s as if you are trying to draw the conclusion that all atheists are pro-abortion. Is that the case here Joe1234?”
generally atheists are liberals and liberals are pro-abortion….I know this is too hard for you….
“And how do you arrive at the conclusion that “the truth hurts” when a poster simply questioned your age or trollish behavior?”
because gomer, and you richly deserve that title, when someone makes a comment like that in relation to what I said…then that poster is bothered by what I said…now if you could just get a clue…
“Then you proceed to call non-believers more bloodthirsty than muslims. Someone else…can you help me out here??”
try history 101…you need a lot of help….wow
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 6:11pmoh and as far as american atheists not being bloodthirsty…well american muslims aren’t either…there are exceptions like the columbine killers…
but of course it all changes when either group gets power…..
Report Post »Tretka
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 2:05amI think many things when I read the story and comments herein.
If you have no spiritual belief at all and are nihilistic, you won’t be able to think about this. But what the heck, the rest of you might. Let me say first, I get it that man was the earthly dispenser of the bible. But how come paganism fell, socialism fails, but the Bible lives on? How come it has never failed?
Okay, have at it!
Report Post »riverdog1
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 12:24pm@joe, athiests rejoice in killing unborn babies. you are not only wrong but disgusting.
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 9:40pmRiverdog, the truth hurts. The atheists I’ve met in life are really just anti-Christian bigots.
Report Post »TH30PH1LUS
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 1:54amGregor Mendel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor_Mendel
Albert of Saxony http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_of_Saxony_(philosopher)
Albertus Magnus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albertus_Magnus
Giovanni Antonelli http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giovanni_Antonelli
Daniello Bartoli http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniello_Bartoli
Ruđer Bošković http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Joseph_Boscovich
RICHARD DAWKINS, do you think you are MORE intelligent than these men?
Report Post »Infidelephant
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 11:01amHe may not be “more intelligent,” but he has the benefit of the last couple centuries of science and discovery that many of the esteemed you mentioned did not.
So many are so quick to quote and rely on ideas conjured up so long ago. Would you have Henry Ford work on your 2011 car?
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 2:56pm“So many are so quick to quote and rely on ideas conjured up so long ago. Would you have Henry Ford work on your 2011 car?”
you mean like that 19th century racist atheist fairy tale known as evolution?
or how about that 19th century failed atheist economic system known as communism?
Report Post »tootsie roll
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 4:06pmin a word YES God is Supreme and you liberal Cosmos believers are idiots. Remember Carl Sagan
Report Post »testing Darwin’s statement that his theory WOULD ABSOLUTELY BREAK DOWN IF IT COULD BE DEMONSTRATED THAT A COMPLES ORGANISM COULD NOT COME INTO EXISTENCE WITHOUT NUMEROUS SUCCESSIVE SLIGHT MODIFICATIONS. Darwin’s own word ifone can not fid ALL of the fine compelling evidence of design on earth, then Darwin’s evoluytion fails
HIS OWN WORDS not these Atheist you are putting out their as the brightest mind in US or the world. LOTS & LOSTS of missing fossils check it out
Steve0218
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 1:47amhttp://www.dissentfromdarwin.com you will see a huge and growning list of credible scientists that do not agree with Dawkin’s
Report Post »whatthehellbook
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 1:40amGod’s love has no bounds and His grace will win out in the end :)
http://www.whatthehellbook.com/the-book/
Report Post »KStret
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 1:19amWhy is it that any time a news story criticizes Rick Dawkins with in 30 seconds his fans are on the message board lamenting about it or falling to their knees praising him? I guess you can’t believe in God if you believe that Rick walks on water.
Report Post »SchenectadyScott
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 1:25amEvery cult has their leader.
Report Post »Kaoscontrol
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 1:26amI believe the short form of ‘Richard’ is ‘D’ followed by an ‘ick’.
Report Post »Dickie Dawson is a sad little man.
The-Monk
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 12:52amDeepak Chopra is an idiot. I meet him at a conference in Sarasota, Fl. back in about 1990. We had lunch together and then went back to the conference. Deepak Chopra started talking about how different species “sees” things; Humans see in the color spectrum from 390 nm to 750 nm, snakes see heat, etc, etc, and then he said, “Bees see Honey”. I about dropped to the floor. Bees see Honey??? No, Bees have a completely different way of seeing things. After the conference I questioned him about this and he just said, “If you are not a Bee, then you don’t know how they see things so any theory is acceptable”. I lost all trust in this crazy man on that day. He has no idea what he is talking about. Some of his ideas are good but, “Bees see Honey”??? Sorry Deepak, I asked Hariprasad Chaurasia about it, after a concert at Ruth Eckerd Hall in late 1990. You do know Hariprasad Chaurasia? Don’t you Deepak? Hariprasad told me the truth. I will never forget it. And you, Deepak, are a liar. Just like obama. Why don’t you hang out at an OWS protest and feed on them or feed off them? Either way… you are a bottom feeder and a liar. Please confront me on this Deepak, I’ll say two words and you crumble to the floor in shame!
Report Post »Kaoscontrol
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 1:21amDepak Chopra is a New Age charlatan/ snake oil salesman. He’s only slightly less “douche-ey” than Dawkins.
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 1:32am@Kaoscontrol
Report Post »When was the last time you had lunch with him? Don’t bother… he’s an idiot an a genius who will tie your mind up in knots about pure non-sense.
Kaoscontrol
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 1:51amActually, I met with Depak on a film project he was helping finance. We had lunch several times… I saw the man behind the facade and he’s a fake.
I agree with with your characterization though, Monk
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 2:20am@Kaoscontrol
Report Post »Thank you for your reply. After meeting with Deepak and many other “Spiritual” leaders I found Deepak lacking in substance, relevance and integrity… what film project were you working on?
Patriotic_Mercenary
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 8:09pmThere is some truth to what he was saying. The spectrum that bees and other collectors see in cause flower petals to be highlighted for them. The bees see into the ultraviolet vision range. Their sensory organs are attuned to nectar-producers. Notice on the second link the contrasting of the background vs the flowers themselves in the pictures.
http://www.sewanee.edu/chem/Chem&Art/Detail_Pages/ColorProjects_2003/Crone/index.htm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-473897/A-bees-eye-view-How-insects-flowers-differently-us.html
I caught part of an episode detailing the reason primates see in the red spectrum. This usage is to determine the ripeness or ‘fullness’ of vegetation, amongst other things.
Humans are also better able to identify changes in the gray spectrum. I know, since I work in the imagery business. Trying to identify variances in color is very tedious vs with gray-scale imagery. That is, of course, without the manipulation of the imagery via different “color guns”, as we describe it…but that’s another topic.
Report Post »Cesium
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 12:20amPsshh.. What a bunch of BS. Dawkins is not like that at all.. He’s a good guy trying to bring scientific inquiry to the minds of the brainwashed. He doesn’t propose people jettison their religion as most think. His points out the truth that the existence of god is a hypothesis and a good hypothesis at that, but their is no clear evidence for gods existence. Taking the acceptable parts of moral philosophy from the bible is not something he opposes and he has said that. However, what he points out is that there is evidence for more amazing and mysterious things in the universe revealed to us by science and engineering that children can embrace rather than simplifying their lives with the supernatural fairy tales from the bible. He has his opinion about religion in general but to what should be the approval of many blaze commenters he stand beside you for his disdain of Islam over any other religion.
Report Post »KStret
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 12:52am“It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, “mad cow” disease, and many others, but I think a case can be made that faith is one of the world’s great evils, comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to eradicate.”
Richard Dawkins, The Humanist, Volume 57, Number 1
Yeah…. what a great guy……
Report Post »mavsfan75
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 1:02amAgreed! If any of these superstitious half-wits on here would actually read Dr. Dawkins book, or the one by David Mills, they might get a clue, unfortunately that will probably never happen. They’ll just keep believing the fairy tales that have been passed down from generation to generation. WAKE UP PEOPLE! Do your own research objectively and then once you have all the facts and info, make an informed decision on what you believe instead of just swallowing the nonsense you’ve been fed all your life!
Report Post »KStret
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 1:14amMav,
Report Post »Do you mean the book that had so many logical flaws in it that even atheists criticized his arguments? Why is he running away from William Lane Craig like a scared little girl?
Thor64
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 1:17amI can see your another useful idiot.You will soon see God manifest his power in the defense of Israel(there is no natural explanation for there continued exsistance only a supernatural one)I would suggest you read a Bible and that would explain alot to you but me thinks you would be to shallow to understand it.
Report Post »captainutah
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 1:33am@MAVSFAN75: Your post illustrates exactly the kind of bias and bigotry Chopra and O’Reilly referred to. I have no issue with anyone believing or not believing but respect the right others have to believe. It’s none of your concern what theory (and they are all theories even the ones Dawkins puts forth) of existence you ascribe to. In response to the second part of your statement regarding people believing the fairytales passed from generation to generation. I think you put far too much stock in the scientific theory of the day, history demonstrates that today‘s scientific fact is often the next generation’s flat Earth theory so be a little less smug. Also, I am proof that your statement is defeatable. I was raised in an extremely secular and anti-religion environment (Birmingham, England) with an agnostic mother and an atheist father surrounded by self-righteous, unthinking atheists with smug superior attitudes about people who they called religious (a cover-term for Christians, the Muslim, Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Wiccan and New Age Spiritualists were all perfectly OK in their book) It was this bigoted narrow mindedness and dismissal of a large swath of society that lead me to do my own research and learn that religion is actually a virtue, something good for the world. I truly hope you stop sucking at Dawkins’ hateful teat and do some research for yourself.
Report Post »Steve0218
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 1:34amKstret—Dawkins is running from William Lane Craig because he saw what Craig did to Hitchens and Harris in debate. Dawkins knows he does not belong on the same stage as Craig. Dawkins looks real good in his books where nobody can intellectually challange him with a response, but on a stage where he can be challanged he looks rather inept.
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 9:15am“Taking the acceptable parts of moral philosophy from the bible is not something he opposes and he has said that”
yeah you atheists get to be your own little gods and pick and choose what is moral. and then once you get power, you slaughter those who disagree with you.
have you made your animal sacrifice to your racist bloodthirsty god darwin today??
Report Post »Infidelephant
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 10:57am@Cesium
HEAR HEAR!!! A voice of reason on the Blaze! Good to see.
Report Post »navyordnance
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 11:42amNot enough, simply because he’s against radical (or even non radical) Islam, simply isn’t enough to overcome the insult he throws at all religions, your statement is laughable. Bigotry is the issue, pure and simple. He REQUIRES everyone to believe his way or you’re simply not inteligent enough to be around him. That’s no different than saying someone of color is sub-human because they’re skin is a different color than yours. Your simplistic view should make people shudder.
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 11:54am“That’s no different than saying someone of color is sub-human because they’re skin is a different color than yours. Your simplistic view should make people shudder.”
thats just what darwin thought, and whats inherent in his racist theory of evolution.
Report Post »kmichaels
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 5:24pm[Cesium
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 12:20am
Psshh.. What a bunch of BS. Dawkins is not like that at all.. He’s a good guy trying to bring scientific inquiry to the minds of the brainwashed]
I have read various things that Dawkins has put out and frankly I fail to see his point. Maybe the problem is that he groups any sort of faith all into one bag, which is just retarded on his part. I have faith in a just, wise, honest, kind and loving God. I really don’t see any evil in that, even if it turned out that I was wrong, what harm did it cause?
Do I think that people can have dangerous misguided faith? Of course. But that sort of misguided faith can also be present amongst practicing atheists, case in point, Stalin, Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Hitler, etc. Of course Hitler was not quite as much as a self-proclaimed atheist as the others.
Then we have liberals in general, that place their faith in themselves as elitist leaders and the type of elitist governments that they propose.
Report Post »justin.blake
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 5:25pmAny good scientist knows that the prime effort is to prove the ‘null’ hypothesis. In other words, proving something does not happen, or does not exist. I have yet to see a solid logical argument that proves, without a doubt, that God does not exist. There are plenty of theories out there, but there is no proof. Dawkins here tries to reverse the argument and use his ‘scientific’ background to ask people to prove that God exists. We don’t have to. You just have to prove that he doesn’t. And you can’t. So, in the words of a famous comedian “Thank you for flying with us today…buh bye. :)
Report Post »taxpro4u03
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 8:27pm“Religion” CAN be ‘good.’ It can also be BAD — ALL faiths have ‘extremes.’ However, its PURPOSE is to CONTROL an otherwise MASSIVE human population (would the world be all atheists – anarchy and pure animalistic savagery would have wiped **** sapiens as a species from the Earth).
Report Post »binge_thinker
Posted on November 7, 2011 at 12:14amDawkins is an intellectual coward. Dawkins will continually publish books and articles attacking the tenets of the Christian faith and worldview only to hide out when asked to back up the factuality of his works.
Report Post »The Law of Non Contradiction is the WORST enemy of secular atheists. They will say that ALL life can be traced back to a primordial “soup” and that the Universe is 13 Billion years old. What they WON’T tell you is that by their own theory, 13 Billion years isn’t even a fraction of the time it would require of such a “dumb” theory. They will not discuss the Transcendant Cause of the Universe because they don’t HAVE ONE. They may try to throw out an Inflation Field as a “possibility” but the Inflation Field Itself requires Anthropic fine tuning. The secular atheist would have us believe a fary tale likened unto a person walking into the TajMahal and making the absurd assertion that the bricks, mortar and wood by random chance, assembled themselves over 13 Billion years all the while failing to address where the matter came from to assemble the very materials that make up the bricks, mortar and wood that make up the grand Taj Mahal that is our Anthropically fine tuned and orderly Universe.
A PhD after someone’s name does not excuse such ignorance.
binge_thinker
Posted on November 7, 2011 at 12:18amDawkins is an intellectual coward and fraud. Period.
Report Post »Dawkins will continually publish books and articles attacking the tenets of the Christian faith and worldview only to hide out when asked to back up the factuality of their works.
I say this again, The Law of Non Contradiction is the WORST enemy of secular atheists. They will say that ALL life can be traced back to a primordial “soup” and that the Universe is 13 Billion years old. What they WON’T tell you is that by their OWN theory, 13 Billion years isn’t even a fraction of the time it would require of such a “dumb” theory. They will not discuss the Transcendant Cause of the Universe because they don’t have one. They may try to throw out an Inflation Field as a “possibility” but the Inflation Field itself requires Anthropic fine tuning. The secular atheist would have us believe a fary tale likened unto a person walking into the TajMahal and making the absurd assertion that the bricks, mortar and wood by chance, assembled themselves over 13 Billion years all the while failing to address where the matter came from to assemble the very materials that make up the bricks, mortar and wood that make up the grand Taj Mahal that is our Anthropically fine tuned and orderly Universe.
AltimaZeromus
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 12:20amhttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/deepak-chopra/sarah-palin-my-president_b_878799.html
Report Post »Remember this little article?
Lone Ranger
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 12:11amSince when do liberals care about camouflaging their bigotry? They’re right in your face with it.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 12:22amI’d like to know who in the hell actually think Dawkins is anything more than a halfass scientist. Even that’s being too kind. His views are like something said by a schizophrenic remnant of Leary’s acid experiments, operating in Disneyland.
Report Post »hillarie
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 12:07amDepak Chopra was on the Bill Maher show years back when Woody Allen was being excoriated for marrying his step daughter and there were rumors floating that he had molested his own young daughter. Depak was trying to show up the attackers of Woody Allen as being knee jerk moralistic narrow minded jerks. So he said, referring to the rumor of the molestation of Dylan, ‘what’s wrong with an orgasm. It’s an oceanic experience. What difference does it make where it comes from?’
Report Post »His was supposedly presenting the ‘enlightened’ attitude. You could tell from his self-satisfied expression. At that moment I was done with Depak Chopra. He’s an idiot. Case closed.
scoter
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 12:04amhttp://www.helpfireobama.com Please give $20.12
Report Post »AmeriCat
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 6:23amYes!
And also, GBTV …
Hear the Truth and learn the forgotten or hidden history.
See the results of his ideas
and be a part of saving this nation.
GBTV on your computer or use Roku for your TV…
Report Post »Easy. If I can…anybody can!
Subscribe. Give gift subscriptions for Christmas.
txn4justice
Posted on November 2, 2011 at 11:55pmIt’s a good thing these jokers are around to tell us what is real and what to believe.
Report Post »AmericanPatriot01
Posted on November 2, 2011 at 11:43pmIt’s ALL ABOUT GOOD or EVIL not christian, morman, athiest, baptist, buhddist or catholic, it is GOOD or EVIL, LIFE or DEATH, LIGHT or DARK, LOVE or HATE, TRUTH or DECEIT. Those are the only choices on the table.
If the deeds of a people are good, cherish life and promote truth, love and light then I will stand with them and promote them as family.
If the people impose their will on others (EVIL), take human life and promote dark intent and hate, I will rebuke them, oppose them and expose their deceit.
It makes no difference on the details like religious differences THESE ARE THE CORE PRINCIPLES.
Report Post »STOP BICKERING ABOUT THE DIFFERENCES AND STAND ON THE ROCK OF COMMON GROUND!!!!
scoter
Posted on November 2, 2011 at 11:37pmFox News’ “O’Reilly Factor,” Bill O’Reilly is not telling the truth. Fox is going to the Dog. Like THE REST OF THEM. I watch fox all the time untell Glenn left. Please get GBTV. glenn is DAME good at get out the truth. GBTV. gbtv.Help Glenn out. He help us Go to WWW. HELPFIREOBAMA.COM please help fire OBAMA.
Report Post »riverdog1
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 12:28pmsorry man glenns a loon.
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on November 2, 2011 at 11:20pmAn Indian Guru, who believes in the power of self… attacks an Atheist, who believes power is in self! Are you kidding me?
Report Post »andy87
Posted on November 2, 2011 at 11:31pmIt’s all a matter of perspective.
Report Post »PurrrpleMtnMajesty
Posted on November 2, 2011 at 11:12pmWhile I may not agree with Chopra’s philosophies, I can say I respect him as a human being especially after this interview.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on November 2, 2011 at 11:33pmI will never respect Deepak Chopra after his support of Terri Schiavo’s murder by her husband Mark Schiavo and that good for nothing judge…and I will never respect anyone who supported her murder..I had people telling me things like…”Oh …if I couldn’t sit in my hot tub with my martini everyday…I would just as soon get put out of my misery….they weren’t Terri…her family begged to have her and her husband fought to murder her….Everyone jumped on the bandwagon..including Chopra…what a joke of a man he is
Report Post »Free2speakRN
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 3:29amashestoashes,
Then, imprisoned in her own conscious body, they let her ‘starve and thirst’ to death, and tell us it was……… “death with ‘dignity’”. I wouldn’t do that to a dog!
In 1483, two of the rightful heirs to be King of England, Henry 5th and his younger brother, were killed under the orders of Uncle Richard the 3rd,(who was later killed in battle under Henry the 7th). At least one of the two kids many say was starved to death. He was imprisoned, eventually eating his mattress. This little boy sure died with ‘dignity’…. Earlier, around 14 February 1400, King Richard 2nd, died in captivity, well thought to have been starved to death, eating his clothes and mattress, as well. Maybe they will just shoot us in the head to improve the gift of ‘dying’ with dignity.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 9:41pmFREE@SPEAKRN I think Terri’e death was motivated by money.. you probably have been in the position of near hydration.. so you probably know what poor Terri must have gone through. and I believe it was all for financial gain..
Report Post »PurrrpleMtnMajesty
Posted on November 4, 2011 at 6:29pmashestoashes
Report Post »Wow…I didn‘t recall Chopra’s decision on that.
It was the most pathetic statement of humanity (which includes the late term and partial birth abortions) that our country has taken regarding life. Have to agree, I wouldn’t want to see that done to my worst enemy, much less an animal. Seriously, I find this more repulsive than them dragging Kaddafi out and torturing him and taking their pics with his corpse. (Which I thought was against their faith – or so they wildly proclaimed when the pics of Sadam’s two sons was shown after they were killed). I said to myself, “These people are barbarians -they are not ready for democracy. YES, they have plenty of reason to hate, but to act in the same manner as this horrible person they’re attacking just takes away their humanity.” Then to realize that what we did to Terri was not only worse, but she was loved by her family and never hurt anyone. We are no better and the mask of civilization is just that – a mask. Seems like I am saying daily, “May God FORGIVE us.”
Ford
Posted on November 2, 2011 at 11:06pmMaybe Dawkins needs to be added to Pat and Stu’s douche hall of fame.
Report Post »javasport
Posted on November 2, 2011 at 11:02pmhttp://www.whatyououghttoknow.com/show/2008/05/01/darwins-intelligent-design/
Report Post »Sorocialism
Posted on November 2, 2011 at 11:01pmDawkins and Chopra= YAWN
Report Post »