Chris Christie: Gingrich ‘Has Been an Embarrassment to the Party’
- Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:28pm by
Madeleine Morgenstern
- Print »
- Email »
AP
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie said Sunday Newt Gingrich’s past actions have been “an embarrassment” to the Republican Party and a reason why he should not get the GOP nomination for president.
Speaking on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Christie, a Mitt Romney supporter, said the country doesn’t “need another legislator in the oval office.”
“We need an executive, someone who both in the private sector and as a governor understands how to bring people together and use executive power,” Christie said. “The Speaker simply doesn’t have that experience, he’s never run anything.”
Asking about his past remarks that Romney would never “embarrass America,” host David Gregory asked Christie whether he thinks Gingrich would embarrass the country. Christie said yes, adding that Gingrich has already “embarrassed the party.”
“We all know the record. I mean, he was run out of the speakership of his own party, he was fined $300,000 for ethics violations,” Christie said. “This is a guy who has had a very difficult political career at times and has been an embarrassment to the party.”
He continued, “The fact of the matter is, I don’t need to regale the country with that entire list again except to say this: I’m not saying he will do it again in the future, but sometimes past is prologue.”
Watch the clip below, via NBC:
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 670 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 527 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 388 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 366 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 327 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 260 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 268 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 125 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 147 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 260 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (906)
GoodStuff
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:48pmNewt is a regressive.
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:56pmFaced with all of the progressives, regressive ain’t all that bad.
Report Post »jcannon98188
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:13pmChris Christie is an embarrassment to the party for supporting Romney. Don’t get me wrong, Gingrich is a massive embarrassment too. But Christie has no room to talk when he is pandering to Mitt ‘The Flip-Flop’ Romney.
Report Post »RON PAUL 2012
Rational Man
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:16pmGingrich doesn’t sound any worse than crony Democrats like Kerry, Geithner. Pelosi, Reid, Frank and others to me. Just think about all the stuff those progressives have gotten away with and then read what Wiki says about Gingrich’s “ethics violations”.
Sounds to me like it was the same type of mass smear campaign that the Dems did to Sarah Palin. And just like Palin, they are still repeating the lies about Gingrich.
COME ON!….83 of the 84 “ethics charges” brought up against Gingrich were dropped. What does that tell you?
Eighty-four ethics charges were filed against Gingrich during his term as speaker, all by Democrats. Eighty-three of the charges were later dropped.[65] After extensive investigation and negotiation by the House Ethics Committee, Gingrich was reprimanded and penalized $300,000 by a 395–28 House vote. It was the first time in the history of the House that a speaker was disciplined for an ethics violation.
continued………..
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:17pmcontinued…….
In January 1997, Gingrich said “I did not manage the effort intensely enough to thoroughly direct or review information being submitted to the committee on my behalf. In my name and over my signature, inaccurate, incomplete and unreliable statements were given to the committee, but I did not intend to mislead the committee.” All of the charges but one were dropped, in one case because there was no evidence that Gingrich was still violating, as of the time of the investigation, the rule that he was found to have violated in the past. The one charge not dropped was a charge of claiming tax-exempt status for a college course run for political purposes. In addition, the House Ethics Committee concluded that inaccurate information supplied to investigators represented “intentional or … reckless” disregard of House rules.
The Ethics Committee’s Special Counsel, James M. Cole, concluded that Gingrich had violated federal tax law and had lied to the ethics panel in an effort to force the committee to dismiss the complaint against him. The full committee panel did not agree whether tax law had been violated and left that issue up to the IRS. In 1999, the IRS cleared the organizations connected with the “Renewing American Civilization” courses under investigation for possible tax violations.
Report Post »Tired of Code Names
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:28pm@Rational Man..Another great post. I don’t care if you are a Gingrich supporter or not. But, the media hates the inconvenient FACTS when they are trying to smear someone. Gingrich got smeared back then. The Progressive GOP elite establishment are shaking in their boots considering the possibility that if Newt could do the things he did to disrupt the elites as a “mere” speaker of the house, holy batman, what would he do if he was the President? The progressive apple cart and the establishment from both sides are likely to be severely disrupted in their efforts to “progress” the american public further down the road to the establishment financial benefit.
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:44pmI’m no fan of Newts but speaking of embarrassment? He needs to go sit his fat liberal rear end down somewhere.
Report Post »hidden_lion
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:44pmRationalman-
Report Post »It is not smear, it is truth. The dudes a crook. It is just like the liberals you listed. I thought we wanted something different?
Jaycen
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:48pmYes, Newt certainly is a Progressive Socialist. He’s even said as much several times in several interviews. You can catch the examples on YouTube.
In any case, Romney’s really no better. I feel like Romney is a wishy-washier version of Newt!
Santorum also has some big government, big spending issues in his history. It‘s nice that he’s focused on morality, but some of his constant references get on my nerves.
Ron Paul isn’t even on the map for me. I consider myself a Constitutional Conservative. If I’m forced to choose between Ron Paul and Obama, I’m going to vote for Obama. Better the Prog I know than the one I don’t.
Report Post »booger71
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:52pmChris, why do you let the progressives ride rough shod over the 2nd Amendment in New Jersey?
Report Post »cuinsong
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:09pmRomney is a progressive and a health care advocate what else do you need to know
Report Post »“The Devils song“ to enlighten you
http://www.reverbnation.com/play_now/song_10789987
Rational Man
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:15pm@hidden_lion
You didn’t read the Wiki quote, did you??
83 of 84 charges dropped.
“The full committee panel did not agree whether tax law had been violated and left that issue up to the IRS. In 1999, the IRS cleared the organizations connected with the “Renewing American Civilization” courses under investigation for possible tax violations.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newt_Gingrich
What happened to Gingrich is no different than what happened to Palin. They both had to step down from their possitions because of an avalanche of BOGUS “ethics violations” for the good of the office and because of the lack of backbone from their Republican colleagues.
We have another crappy field of candidates to choose from and are trying to pick the lesser of two evils. In researching and considering the choices we have, I can hold my nose and vote for Gingrich over the others. If I have to choose between Paul or a firing squad,…Just shoot me!!
Report Post »Theodwulf
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:18pm@rational man
Ethanol? Global Warming? Historian for fredie mac? these by themselves wouldn’t be much to look at , but coupled with past ethic charges and his pesonal life seem to suggest a trend of behavior.
Report Post »Doctor Nordo
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:22pm@JAYCEN
Did you really just call Ron Paul a progressive? LMAO! I don’t care if you like him or not, but to refer to him as progressive is simply asinine.
Report Post »USAMEDIC3008
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:27pmA Regressive-Progressive
Report Post »We did not have much choice in
the last election I am afraid we will not
have a real choice in the next one either.
kryptonite
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:28pmThese Paulists have Loser-Syndrome diarrhea. They are *****ing all over the Republican Party and America’s future. Go home, Ron Paul. You’ve done enough harm already.
As for Christie, you refused to enter the race, so shut up. Go bash Obama and his radicals.
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:35pmNewt has high triglycerides and elevated blood pressure but Chris is morbidly obese, and might not survive an eight year VP tour with Mitt. They are both fat. Period. Newt also looks like a binge drinker.
TEA
Report Post »Starkadder
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:36pmIf regressive is the oppisite of progressive then I’ll take it.
Report Post »Ballot_Box_Revolution
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:36pmJaycen
Can you explain how what you said makes any sense?
Tell us where Paul is Constitutional.
Tell us where Obama is Constitutional.
And then explain how you are a constitutional conservative….
Report Post »unsafe
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:37pmChris is nothing more then a loud mouth bully and rino.
Report Post »DixieLady
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:38pmWhat are your reasons for that statement?
Report Post »Polwatcher
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:40pmEstablishment Republicans like Christie are the embarrassment to the Party. The establishment Republicans which are aligned with Wall Street and FOX News have no discernable respect for fly-over folks around the country.
Report Post »Ballot_Box_Revolution
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:40pmsorry…..And then tell us how you don’t know Paul when Paul tells you what he thinks without regards to who he is speaking to, and who it might pi$$ off. I think Paul is pretty open about everything, and has been for many years now consistant…..You can take what he says to the bank, whether you agree with him or not….He tells you where he would LIKE TO SEE this country…you know the direction he wants to go.
Obama does not tell you where he is going, and lies to your face and laughs about it…Sure we know what he wants…..but he would never admit it….
Report Post »DesdemonasCrew
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:41pmjcannon98188
Report Post »Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:13pm
Chris Christie is an embarrassment to the party for supporting Romney. Don’t get me wrong, Gingrich is a massive embarrassment too. But Christie has no room to talk when he is pandering to Mitt ‘The Flip-Flop’ Romney.
RON PAUL 2012
The biggest embarressment to the party and the Country is that shrill old fart who has never accomplished anything but bonehead rhetoric…well, him and his KoolAid drinking robots: Ron Paul in 1952!
Rational Man
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:43pm@Theodwulf
You choose your POC candidate and I’ll choose mine. They all stink on ice!
Report Post »I don’t care about your opinion. I presented facts about Gingrich’s “ethics violations” and pointed out the strategy of the progressives to use bogus ethics charges to smear their enemies. And how Christie and Romney are now doing the same using ammunition provided by the left.
You decide……………………
CONNIPTION FITZ
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:49pmNot regressive, but repentant, a repentant, redeemed man and a hopefully repentant, redeemed and restored CONSERVATIVE Republicanism.
Not just economically conservative, but socially Conservative too.
Report Post »oneshiner
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:50pmRational Man: I read it as as much as I could digest. My husband remembers how Newt was smeared by the likes of Pelosi, who already has so much dirt on herself, she has no right to point fingers, because many point back at her. I’d like to see ethic charges against her.
Newt was charged with one count out of 83. The IRS found the donations to charity were consistent with it’s (the charity) stated exempt purpose. (Wash. Post in 1999)
Gov. Sununu brings this up knowing his own problems when he was Chief of Staff for HW Bush taking people on expensive trips, got caught and had to repay back 1/10 of the actual cost of the trips. He resigned in disgrace. He has it against Newt because he wanted to raise TAXES with HW Bush, but Newt was against raising taxes, but now it’s payback against Newt for looking out for the public over this, “read my lips, no new taxes” and HW Bush & Sununu were all for raising taxes
So, what these nasty people are bringing up may come back to bite them on the bottom, cause I hate blatant liars who are artists at manipulating stories to suit their own causes.
I’m disappointed with Chris Christi making a deal with Romney. In fact, I’m so unhappy, I won’t vote for Romney at all, and Christi can continue being a spoiler for all the wrong reasons, unless he was promised something. hmm? SO THERE! Don’t believe every liar in Government. They think we’re stupid. Let’s take back our Country against these slimeballs.
Report Post »Ballot_Box_Revolution
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:56pmBecause his proposals are ones that ask the government to give up power……of course nothing passed. Paul wants to give you liberty and take power away from Washington….Of Course nothing passes because everyone else is corrupt. Does that mean the corrupt is right because they pass laws?
I hear this talking point a lot “Paul has been in congress and hasn’t done/passed anything” But that should lead you to the next question….well what has he tried to pass?? And then when you find the answer to that you will say…..well who voted against that, and why???
I have looked….and yeah there are a few things that you might say….”really Ron, did you think that would pass?” But most of it makes me wonder where the hack were the freedom loving constitutional republicans?? The secret is none of them care about you, they are just pandering to you for your vote…
One of the things that Paul proposed was the US getting out of the UN and getting the UN headquarters off of US soil….Who is not for that?…..and why?…..and if it is just to extreme to do it that way…..why haven’t people tried to work out a way to do it that is not that far out there?
We don’t see much of Paul as he is running for president, you think they are going to make his proposals front page news?
Report Post »arx
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:04pmI will not vote for Romney the half ass lib. I have nothing but good impressions/memories of Gingrich when he ran the house in the mid 90s. In fact I followed that closely and believe all that ethics crap was just that…crap.look at Tom delay, Sarah or any other conservative that has been railroade in the. Public eye. Some of the things I’ve heard about Gingrich recently concern me, and I didn’t appreciate the pelosi on the couch bit, but I’m ready to give him a chance. I think he has the balls to do what he says he will do..
Report Post »and I know nothing will change with Romney
ElPzee
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:10pmWhat a cook. Romney institutes an individual mandate in Mass. with OBOMNEY-CARE. Romney supports government stimulus through subsidies, AND NEWT IS THE EMBARRASSMENT????
Lost a ton of respect for This clown for actively deceiving the american people
Report Post »ElPzee
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:14pmOBOMNEY-CARE and continued support for government stimulus ISN’T embarrassing??? IT’S DESPICABLE!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »PresidentDowngrade
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:16pmChris Christie appointed a Muslim judge. Whats next we find that Willard has dealings in Saudi Arabia like Bloomberg and supports the ground zero mosque. I will vote for Newt and cheer if he wins. He is the only one I can think of that can slay liberals and the media at that level.
Report Post »WAKEUPUSA2012
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:18pmChris Christie you support a flip-floping big government model for ObamaCare shill. A pretty boy Ken Doll type. You are a laughable fool.
Report Post »Paul Revere
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:23pmRIP republican party. RIP USA. You are going to wish that you gave RP an honest study. Shame on you Glenn!
Rational Man
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:31pm@oneshiner
Your a patriot! Thanks for your input…………………
Gingrich is no “saint”. But lets at least tell the truth about him, bad or good. Then decide the lesser of two evils to vote for…….As usual………………..
The ethics violations were just a smear campaign by the Dems that worked. He was absolved of all but one which he admitted was mishandled in commitee and decided to pay the fine. The IRS absolved him of any wrong doing as far as they were concerned. Nuff said!
No one in their right mind thinks that Gingrich cheating on his wife is a good thing. He has openly and repeatedly confessed, apologized and repented of what he did. But I’m not taking the word of a bitter ex-wife that he wanted an “open marriage”. Especially when she has threatened to ruin him with a single statement and made that statement 2 days before the primary. I am a Christian and I believe in forgiveness when someone truely repents and is sorry. But I’m not under the delusion that we can find a totally “pure” candidate to vote for. I want to vote for Santorum, but he is just such a weakling in the debates that I don’t feel confident that he could stand up to Obama and the “scorched earth” political and media beating that the nominee will have to overcome. Which is too bad………….
Report Post »Love_John_Galt
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:33pmNewt Gingrich has been a member of the ‘progressive’ Council on Foreign Relations since 1990. This NGO, founded in 1921, and bankrolled with BIG MONEY from the Rockefeller Foundation and J. P. Morgan among other internationalists, has been dedicated since its inception to dismantling American sovereignty, de constructing our Constitution and our Bill of Rights, and promoting the idea of One World Government! During his long tenure in Congress which began in 1979, and ended in disgrace in 1999, Newt Gingrich supported and even pushed through Congress, as the Minority Whip or as the Speaker of the House, Federally funded loan guarantees to China! This is one of the reasons that China is beating the pants off us today in world trade! In 1993 New Gingrich not only voted for the ‘job destroying’ North American Free Trade Agreement, (NAFTA) but he was also instrumental in getting enough Republican support to pass the bill. In 1994, as the House Minority Whip, Newt voted to support the creation of the World Trade Organization (WTO) with his vote on GATT! In his position as Minority Whip, he had the power to postpone the vote on GATT, The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, until it could have been modified or defeated in the House, but he chose instead to let the bill pass in a Lame Duck session of Congress! Newt voted in favor of The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade which subjects Americans to the international authority and the regulation of the World Trade Orga
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:36pmHere’s a fantastic resource on Newt not being a Conservative. A LOAD of information.
See here.
Newt Gingrich is Not a Conservative Recap (Parts 1-14)
Report Post »http://www.ronpaul2012.com/2012/01/22/newt-gingrich-is-not-a-conservative-recap-parts-1-14/
Wolf
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:40pmThere isn‘t a GOP candidate that isn’t an embarassment to America- Christie is in the top four contenders.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:41pm@Jaycen,
“Ron Paul isn’t even on the map for me. I consider myself a Constitutional Conservative.”
If you consider yourself a Constitutional Conservative, then it would make sense for you to vote for Ron Paul, since he’s really the only Constitutional Conservative running.
What issues do you have with Ron Paul? Let me try to address them.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:48pm@Ballot_Box_Revolution
Report Post »Paul wants to give you liberty and take power away from Washington…
——–
Lead by example, dude, especially since you have been an abject failure at it. Your hair has turned gray in Washington, old man, and your brain has fossilized. But don’t despair. Your ranch is waiting for you in the great state of Texas…
catzcomment
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:49pmTo JCannon98188 – since I realize Ron Paul supporters NEVER give credence to anything anyone else has to say, I’ll hope that those of us who are NOT Ron Paul supporters will give me a moment. No one candidate ever has every single qualification any one particular voter wishes for. And I think many of us are so incredibly frightened at how this “president” has been shredding apart the foundations that make this country great, that we are agonizing over the possibility of NOT throwing Obama out in 2012. Newt’s last performance gave voice to all the anger we share. However, we need to pick a candidate who is for the time we live in. The REAL ISSUE right now is JOBS, the ECONOMY and GETTING THE GOVERNMENT OUT OF OUR WAY. Many are upset that Romney opened up the door to federal healthcare in Massachusetts. However, because of that experience he does absolutely have a greater understanding of what to do and indeed what NOT to do. Just as Ron Paul, being a doctor, has a greater understanding that Newt on this issue. And having been a successful business owner, he understands the needs of the business owner. I’m tired of seeing businesses in my hometown being shuttered. I’m sticking with Romney.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:03pm@catzcomment,
“And having been a successful business owner, he understands the needs of the business owner. I’m tired of seeing businesses in my hometown being shuttered. I’m sticking with Romney.”
I recommend the following article, because it shows that Romney’s skill as a business owner is completely irrelevant to fulfilling the oath of office as President (or any public office, for that matter).
See here.
I Wouldn’t Hire Ron Paul…
Report Post »http://lewrockwell.com/goyette/goyette23.1.html
abbygirl1994
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:09pmFlip Flop, aren’t we all flip flops, don’t we all change our minds after we learn from our mistakes, you people are always expecting perfection from these candidates..if you want someone perfect, well lets just let the country go to hell while we sit back in our recliners and wait for Jesus to come and fix it. Anyone is better than what we have, but it is nice to know about their values, character and morals. which Newt Gingrich does not have. He cheated on his first wife, he cheated on his second wife.. and dimes to donuts he will cheat on his third. Or ask her to have a open marriage.. at least Mitt Romney has only flip flopped! God help us!
Report Post »resme
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:10pm@doctor, I can name three issues they have, Rush,Hannity, and levin.
Pull the sled for fox news sheep.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:11pmNewt Gingrich embodies nearly everything that the Tea Party opposes in the Republican Party. He has supported the individual mandate in Obamacare, climate change legislation, TARP/Wall Street bailouts, Internet censorship, the indefinite detention of Americans without due process, etc., etc. Gingrich IS the big-government establishment that the Tea Party rose up against.
Sharp debate skills and fierce partisan rhetoric do not make you conservative; nor do “grandiose” thoughts (grandiosity is anti-conservative). What matters is your record. Most conservative House Republicans are alarmed at the prospect of Gingrich and prefer Mitt Romney, who has a more conservative record than Gingrich, if only slightly, and no history of ethics violations
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:13pmyou people really are murderers… you ever think about what you are typing?
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:14pmhttp://www.forbes.com/sites/janetnov…tacked-by-irs/
First the WSJ article about Mitt’s problems with stuffing millions in his IRA, and now this.
Newt Gingrich avoided tens of thousands of dollars in Medicare payroll taxes in 2010 by using a technique the Internal Revenue Service has consistently and successfully attacked. Republican Presidential candidate Gingrich and his wife, Callista, treated only $444,327 of what they got from Gingrich Holdings. Inc. and Gingrich Productions as compensation to them, while reporting a whopping $2.4 million of their earnings from these corporations as profits or dividends. Medicare taxes are levied at a rate of 2.9% on an unlimited amount of compensation and self-employment income (say, from a consulting contract, speeches or a book) but not on profits from a business.
“It appears that he is not paying his fair share of Medicare tax,’’ Robert E. McKenzie, a partner in the Chicago law firm of Arnstein & Lehr LLP concluded, in an email to Forbes, after reviewing Gingrich’s 2010 tax return. McKenzie, a past chairman of the Employment Tax Committee of the American Bar Association Tax Section and a member of the IRS’ Advisory Council, added: “There are a multitude of cases where the IRS has successfully challenged the improper tax strategy of this candidate and his accountants. Service businesses are only allowed to distribute a fair return on investment from an S corp. as profits exempt from Medicare taxes. T
Report Post »lillymckim
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:14pmI live in Florida and my vote is going for Newt Gingrich tomorrow!
Report Post »Jolten Dean
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:15pmNewt is the best candidate we could ask for. Ronald Regan was a moderate conservative, and turned out to be the best President in modern history. Newt is a moderate conservative, who sees the more conservative needs that now are required. He has been there and already done what we need to have done now. He is strong, he is articulate, and his concepts make sense. I like the tea party policies, but we won’t get anything but 4 years of lame duck with a mushy Republican President unless we elect Newt. I also fully believe that none of the other three candidates can beat Obama. Newt always has the facts, raises the question to a higher level of what we need to do and when. I love Glenn Beck, but I don’t agree with him about Newt. We can’t all run around in colonial hats and Santorum or Romney are George Washington. They are not, and we wouldn’t want that. Speaker Newt Gingrich is electable as President because of his political convictions, personal strength, intelligence, articulation, and knowledge of how to get things done in Washington. He would be effective. He is the only one who can help us achieve the American goals. I support Newt Gingrich for President.
Report Post »lillymckim
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:17pmBtw Christie what does this gain anyone .. we are all fighting on the same side to remove Obama from office.
Please stop.
I will at the end of the day vote for whatever Republican gets the nod.
Report Post »hauschild
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:40pmChris is correct about Newt in that he’s a legislator, or more aptly, a lifelong politician/academic who never had to really produce concrete results. Newt talks a superb game and we all love it, but leopards do not change their spots. If Newt went out as an embarrassment from the House, there’s more than a good chance he does the same if he is elected POTUS.
Problem is, Romney’s a candy ass.
So, we’re left to choose between a candy ass RINO and a big government progressive; unless you’re me and vote for Gary Johnson.
Report Post »GlimmerMan
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:44pmI think we should regress to sanity, we have progressed into stupidity. The GOP tend to support socialistic/communistic ideals at a slightly slower rate than Dem’s.
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:45pmJaycen,
Many Ron Paul critics don’t like his foreign policy. I personally think that if they were more logical and willing to listen to true experts like Michael Scheuer,and Colonel Douglas MacGregor (among others) they might realize that Pauls foreign policy is actually the most fiscally responsible, the most Constitutional, and the most Christian.
Report Post »However, for you to claim to be a “Constitutional Conservative” and then to call Ron Paul “Prog” is absolute proof that you are clueless about what a “Constitutional Conservative” is and also about what Progressivism is. No politician in our lifetimes has ever come close to Ron Pauls strict adherence to the Constitution, and Paul is the exact opposite of the Progressives. Please educate yourself on the Constitution and the Progressive movement, and on Ron Paul so that you avoid making such ridiculous statements.
ashestoashes
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:46pmWhy wonder what Newt has supported and voted for in his career
Report Post »http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2818630/posts
Backs Funds For Abortion
Newt Gingrich supported a proposal for mandatory carbon cap and trade -
co-sponsored the Global Warming Prevention Act
Supported Federal Health Insurance
supports Obama and Mitt Romney’s healthcare plan
Supports Amnesty for Illegals Aliens
voted to raise the debt ceiling 4 times
was paid by Freddie Mac to lobby Republicans for support
voted to create the Department of Education
supported the World Trade Organization
voted to take land away from states and individuals
cosponsored the 1987 Fairness Doctrine (anti 1st Amendment legislation
worked for the Rockefeller campaign (David Rockefeller.. in a statement to the United Nations Business Council in September 1994, sometimes cited as evidence that the New World Order had a motive for carrying out the September 11, 2001, attacks:
“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.”[2]
Bible Quotin' Science Fearin' Conservative American
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:47pmI like Ron Paul. But he‘s 0 for 3 so it’s time to get real.
It‘s just too bad that he’s the ONLY one left with any integrity.
It’s a choice between two slimeballs now.
Report Post »jzs
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 8:01pmRational Man says, “COME ON!….83 of the 84 “ethics charges” brought up against Gingrich were dropped. What does that tell you?”
It tells me they negotiated a plea bargain deal to drop the charges if Gingrich would admit to one and pay a fine of 300,000 bucks. It does not tell me that he was innocent of the other charges.
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 8:03pmJaycen “Ron Paul isn’t even on the map for me. I consider myself a Constitutional Conservative. If I’m forced to choose between Ron Paul and Obama, I’m going to vote for Obama. Better the Prog I know than the one I don’t.”
Jaycne and Kryptonite have loyalties other than the US Constitution. They demand more American blood and treasure for Israel while Dr. Paul has said enough is enough. It’s time for America to begin looking out for Amreican interests not the interests of Israel, Big oil, and the Military Industrial complex.
Are you two dual citizens? You’re pathetic. Constitutional conservatives my ***! lol Did I say pathetic?
Obama? lol Probably who the both of you voted for anyway.
Report Post »BECKI5NUT5
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 8:11pmFat-azz Christie is tough-talking and an apparent fiscal “conservative”, but he is an anti-gun Northeast-corridor liberal in most other respects, ergo… he supports a fellow RINO from Massa-two-shitz. Newt is not perfect, but he will TAKE IT TO Obama WITHOUT TREPIDATION. Many people like the fact that Trump and Christie are straight talking and without fear, but Newt is all that and MUCH more conservative on most issues than they ever THOUGHT of being. Obama FEARS Newt, and would LOVE to have a milquetoast, collegial type RINO
Report Post »to go up against like Romney – aka LOSER RINO, McCain Part Deux.
Rational Man
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 8:23pm@jzs
Got any proof?
Or just more Paulistinian speculation from a bias standpoint?
I don’t even have to wonder if the progressives did the same thing to Paul as they did to Palin and Gingrich, that you would be calling for the heads of those who made false ethics claims against Paul.
Report Post »The deal with Paul is he is too much in line with progressive ideas and is no threat to progressives because he is too goofy to ever even get elected. Let alone be successful in any conservative policy if he were elected. That and they know Obama would probably give Paul a stroke in the first debate anyway……………………
Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 8:28pmOne thing about you HAVE to admit is that the progressive establishment hates Gingrich. Just sayin. That is obvious.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 8:38pmThe Dems and RINOs hate Gingrich…….. they did in the 80′s and they do today
Report Post »booger71
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 8:52pmNewt Gingrich has been a member of the ‘progressive’ Council on Foreign Relations since 1990
Report Post »==========================
So is Angelina Jolie, so what. You do realize that Alex J is a member of the Jesuit Black Robe and a CIA asset don’t you
cous1933
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:11pmRational(?) Man,
You wrote “The deal with Paul is he is too much in line with progressive ideas”.
Please explain how any of Ron Pauls positions on any issue are in any way in line with progressive ideas. I assume you’re talking about the Progressive movement in American politics, exemplified by Presidents like Wilson, FDR and Obama.
Report Post »Are you aware that your guy Newt has referred to himself as “Wilsonian” and also repeatedly called FDR “The greatest President of the 20th century?
Grey Eagle
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:21pmBetter Newt than Romney.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:24pm@Rational Man,
“The deal with Paul is he is too much in line with progressive ideas and is no threat to progressives because he is too goofy to ever even get elected.”
He’s actually quite the opposite of a Progressive.
See here.
War, Ron Paul, and Conservatism
http ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLUoWhWsOWk
And here.
SA@The DC – Ron Paul’s Reaganesque Foreign Policy
http ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjwaExW6-Fg
And here.
Thought Controllers Call Ron Paul “Extreme”
Report Post »http ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FFhSr1A1do
jzs
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:28pm“Rational Man” says, “Got any proof?” No, rational man I have no access to what took place behind closed doors when the the ethics committee voted 7-1 to impose a penalty or when the House subsequently voted 395 to 28 to impose a $300K fine on him, the first time in American history a Speaker has been fined. Gingrich admitted guilt for the single charge and ask for forgiveness. He soon after gave up his position in disgrace, not only for this, but also because Republicans wanted to get rid of him.
No Rational Man, I don’t have any proof that Gingrich accepted a single charge so that the rest would be dropped. None.
Report Post »Tired of Code Names
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:54pm@rtational man @jzs
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:28pm
“Rational Man” says, “Got any proof?” No, rational man I have no access to what took place behind closed doors when the the ethics committee voted 7-1 to impose a penalty or when the House subsequently voted 395 to 28 to impose a $300K fine on him, the first time in American history a Speaker has been fined. Gingrich admitted guilt for the single charge and ask for forgiveness. He soon after gave up his position in disgrace, not only for this, but also because Republicans wanted to get rid of him.
No Rational Man, I don’t have any proof that Gingrich accepted a single charge so that the rest would be dropped. None.
Obviously jzs has never worked in a real business that had to weigh the pro‘s and con’s of defending totaly ludicrous allegations. It’s so dismaying to see that so few folks in this country like jzs think the progressive utopia. It”s just plain silly. First, thier is corruption in government. Both sides. Special deals for friends. I am appalled at Romney stating that he “earned” all his money. He did. Only becuase he had the inside track. I‘ve watched guy’s who‘s dad’s were “influential” guide their son’s to be the president of a company based only on that influence. Sure, that kid worked a couple of years as a low level guy…..but….then got miraculously became the president of the company regardless of how hard folks who had 20 years of experinece had on the pu
Report Post »Arfmoogle
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 10:23pmShould we order “eggs mit romney?” If you don’t like them today, come back tomorrow and they’ll flip over for you all by themselves.
Report Post »MSGT
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 10:42pmYou guys are being lied to by Glenn Beck. Beck’s VERY SOFT support for Santorum is only to keep the conservative vote divided. Beck supports Mitt {the most liberal candidate}. Google, ‘THE WHITE HORSE PROPHECY’. We’ve been stabbed in the back by Beck.
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 10:51pm“Beck’s VERY SOFT support for Santorum is only to keep the conservative vote divided.”
I don‘t think you’ve been listening to Glenn Beck.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 10:57pm@cous1933, A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
ACLU: Ron Paul More Progressive Than Obama
“A new report card by the American Civil Liberties Union, Liberty Watch 2012, ranks Paul higher than Obama on a host of progressive and anti-war issues.”
http://voices.yahoo.com/article/9281639/aclu-ron-paul-more-progressive-than-obama-10788627.html
Report Post »PatriotNAmerica
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 10:59pmI believe that kryptonite and jaycen may have other loyalties.. You guys dual citizens or just Israelis?
Report Post »catman
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 10:59pmPeople who support Mitt must stop looking at WHAT’S BEST FOR AMERICA TOMORROW BUT WHAT’S BEST FOR AMERICA IN THE FUTURE! Why doesn’t Newt or Santorum go after Mitt on the Judges & SAN? Mitt always talks about what he got done as Governor with Democrats at the State level. But look at what Newt got done with the Democrats at the Federal level… the State level is like high school football & the Federal level is like Pro football. The Federal level is all cut throat which is why the Democrats want Mitt to win. The Democrats think even if Obama would lose to a Moderate Mitt, they can still get a lot of their socialism programs done. Mitt is a P.C. guy. He might win some battles. But they know that Newt is a lot more Conservative… he calls a Spade a Spade & Newt can not only win battles but he can win the War!!! If elected President, Newt should tell the Public that he won’t be like Obama… negotiations WILL be on C-Span so people can see the Truth. I believe Newt won’t be like Bush. Newt will keep the American Public informed.
Report Post »Mitt is the only one that said he was mixed on appointing Constitutional Judges reported by the survey by FRC.
Judges will be the most important thing for our Countries Future. Mitt could appoint a liberal judge to the courts. If it happens to the Supreme Court our Country & Freedom will be lost for along time or maybe forever.
Mitt hasn’t signed on to SAN (Strong America Now). This program will cut $500 Billion a year in waste.
Jim
carbonyes
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:02pmJAYCEN, you haven’t even begun to know Obama yet – he’s not even been vetted to this day, and many negative, destructive discoveries are not being touched by FOX NEWS let alone the lame stream media.
Report Post »Whether you realize it or not, if Obama is able to craft a second term, he will become your liberal a$$e$ worst nightmare.
carbonyes
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:04pmHey fatso, why don’t you take a powder. Seems like you got diarrhea of the mouth sometimes.
Report Post »HippoNips
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:05pmMan, since Glenn Beck has gone off his rocker , the Blaze has attracted the real crazies
Newflash nimrod
Newt is conservative…….NOT progressive, He never supported a “mandate” without an opt out of surety bonds
There is nothing big P -Progressive about Newt , not a godammned thing
Get your heads out of your rears.
Report Post »Cosmos102
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:15pmAhhhhhhh….See…..Now Christie’s gone and stepped in it. When will these bone heads realize they can’t split their party against itself and then expect their guy to win??? It’s bad enough when talk show hosts do it!
Americans who want Obama kicked out of office in Nov need to stick together. United we stand. Divided we fall. Cheer for your guy, but don’t criticize the others. That should be the rule. At least it should be the rule for political leaders, like Christie.
Report Post »what4
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:25pmChristie didn’t get the memo….Till the fat lady sings….Hey FAT MAN stick to Jersey and your Rino bud Mitt, Dont try to represent Republicans with your endosment of Flipper!
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:26pm@jzs
I can only assume that you are so focused on Paul, who has accomplished nothing in 23yrs and 620 bills that he authored that never got any farther than HIS desk, and has therefore never garnered the dishonest attention and vicious intentions of the Dems as people like Gingrich and Palin have, you can’t get your mind wrapped around the fact that the afore mentioned were actually doing something that threatened the Dems so as to compell the Dems to slander them falsely through bogus ethics violations and reduce them to having to resign their offices for the common good. Paul will never have that problem since he, (in 23yrs), has never “deserved” that kind of attention from the Dems. He is impotent and the Dems know it and don’t waste their time and resources on him.
Report Post »But you continue to tell it how you want. You might fool somebody…..maybe………….
mac410
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:34pmRomney must have promised Christy a seat at the table if he wins.
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:49pmRational Man,
As usual the ACLU gets it wrong (and so do you). Being anti-war is not a true Progressive stance, In fact, all three of the Progressive presidents I mentioned earlier Wilson, FDR, and Obama, all have in common that they profess an anti-war opinion (because it was the popular opinion) and yet all three deliberately led us into wars. Also Ron Paul does not believe in “gay rights” as the ACLU says. He believes in individual rights. No group rights. He is truly and individualist rather than a collectivist. Collectivism is the trademark of the Progressives and you will never see Paul participate in collectivist thinking. By the way when you group all Ron Paul supporters into one category for convenient disparaging, you are using collectivist thinking.
Report Post »Even the example the ACLU uses to imply that Paul is “to the left” of Obama – drug laws, is incorrect. There were no drug laws in America prior to the twentieth century, coinciding with the Progressive Era started by Wilson (and continued by virtually every American President since, with the exception of Calvin Coolidge.
Progressivism is all about big government control. If you know anything at all about Ron Paul, you know he is the ONE candidate from either party that is furthest from big government control.
A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:53pm@Tired of Code Names,
“I am appalled at Romney stating that he “earned” all his money. He did. Only becuase he had the inside track. I‘ve watched guy’s who‘s dad’s were “influential” guide their son’s to be the president of a company based only on that influence. Sure, that kid worked a couple of years as a low level guy…..but….then got miraculously became the president of the company regardless of how hard folks who had 20 years of experinece …”
We’ve been conditioned to believe that we are owed a job, and this is why it seems unfair that someone with an “inside track” gets ahead of us.
But the wages that we get paid come out of the resources that the owner of the company owns. Unless we agree on a contract for a promotion, that future job does not belong to us.
And it’s always up to the owner who gets a particular job, so I see nothing wrong with a neophyte being promoted before seasoned workers – it‘s the owner’s prerogative.
Report Post »ishka4me
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:56pmI get it, South Carolina is big, but new hampshire and iowa don’t matter. If you guys choose Newt, I am out because to me he is Bill Clinton, only worse. I don’t stand alone. If you guys in the rest of primaries go with Newt, consider it a landslide for Obama
Report Post »Crush_Liberalism
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:59pmHow the heck has the Republican machine managed (once again) to ensure that serious, moral, and social conservatives are not in the running for nomination? Never EVER underestimate the party to screw up a SURE thing!
Report Post »With Obama an almost SURE loser before the primaries…why does the retarded machine mindset just spin right on and pump out more of the same crap that lost in 2008?
Good grief…they never learn.
A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 12:12am@Rational Man,
“ACLU: Ron Paul More Progressive Than Obama”
The following videos deal with most of the list. Notice that non-interventionism was in fact part of the Republican Party platform before it was co-opted by Progressives (Bush is also a Progressive).
See here.
War, Ron Paul, and Conservatism
http ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLUoWhWsOWk
And here.
Thought Controllers Call Ron Paul “Extreme”
http ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FFhSr1A1do
It should be noted that it was the Progressive position that caused us to stick our noses into WWI, and it was a Progressive that provoked the attack on Pearl Harbor.
And it’s a Progressive, now, that is deliberately provoking Iran.
See here.
Did FDR Provoke Pearl Harbor?
http ://lewrockwell.com/buchanan/buchanan198.html
And here.
Rethinking the Good War
http ://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance181.html
And here.
Will Holder Fold?
http ://lewrockwell.com/kwiatkowski/kwiatkowski277.html
And then, of course, there‘re Ron Paul’s warnings about what we’re going through, today.
See here.
Ron Paul Predicted 9/11 a Decade Ago!!!!!!!!!!!!
http ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hJTisovvjc
And here.
Ron Paul’s 2002 Predictions All Come True – Incredible Video!
http ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifJG_oFFDK0
No, Ron Paul is not a Progressive.
Report Post »db321
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 1:48amRational Man – it was a Democratic Control Congress that went after Newt with Blood in there eyes. Christie is upset because he sees his Vice Presidency going away.
Report Post »jrmhrpr78
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 3:12am@ JAYCEN How in the world could you possibly say something that stupid? The country will not survive another Obama term! The only reason I could see someone making that kind of rediculous statement is that you have not looked into Ron Paul other than what the biased main streem media is telling you. Do some research about the man. I am sure you will start to see things differently.
Report Post »cylentcee
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 4:09amNewt will be just as bad as Obama, if not worse. Who names their son Newt?
Report Post »reform
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 4:42amRational man have you not realized that these PhD liberals are much smarter than we, you know us conservative independents who have no cognitive thought oh silly me. If only the amount of books they read actually put what they read into practice in the real world not in their fantasy world we’d be a much better society.
Report Post »Obama Been Lauding
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 5:44amJaycen,
Report Post »I hope you have looked into the background of Obama, like everyone has the Republican candidates!!!
Please, look into Obama’s past, and the people he idolizes!!!! Communists, Socialists, etc.!!!
Then, look at who surrounds him now!!!!
I don’t believe any one of the Republican candidates have been surrounded, and influenced, by Communists, Socialists, etc.
“Our Country” is under attack from within!!!! Please, don’t be a sympathizer!!!
Anyone but Obama 2012!!!!
Kevin The Elder
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 6:00amRationalMan. You and those against you should try not emulating loonies on the left. Instead of throwing fuel, state your case honestly. You are right on the money as far as what was happening when Gingrich was the Speaker Of The House (SOTH). The Dems had a plan and executed it perfectly. Newt was not only a thorn in their side, he was a very real threat to become the favorite politician in DC, scaring the knickers off the Leftists, in government and in our MSM. Every week, it seemed, they would lodge a new charge against the speaker, purposely aiming to keep him on the defense, hoping to distract him from his everyday duties. Of course with each charge the press would join in. As each charge became shown to be almost made of whole cloth, another charge would be hurled. Thus the 83 of 84 and the one for which he fell, there was no doubt to We The People that it really wasn’t a charge that would have been pursued had he been anyone else. As far as your saying that Paul is a Progressive, tells me that instead of just wanting to set the record straight, you want to be just like those Dems, hurling untruths. I’m more to the right than my heros, Goldwater and Buckley, and let me tell you even they weren’t as right as Dr. Paul. To me, extreme right means no government, save for the military. Paul’s positions seem right where they should be in regards to much less government spending and I would place him on the right, all others, slightly to the left of where I would want them
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 8:21amLOL damn!
Regressive vs progressive…I think I’d take regressive. That’s a compliment to Newt.
Report Post »GUT_CHECK
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 8:45amThe Blow-Hard breeches for air
Report Post »TAXEVERYONE
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 8:54amObama Christie 2012.
Report Post »mikem1969
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 9:01amOk Christie, let’s take a look at your statement “sometimes past is prologue”. Romneycare, the blueprint for obahitlerstalinmao care. If past is prologue, romneybama will do nothing about it. Romneybama is nothing more than a liberal. Sure, Newt has made some mistakes, but he is still a better choice than romney. Paul does not have the support needed to win the nomination, neither does santorum. So that leaves us with 2 choices, 4 more years of obama through romneybama, or Newt. Hmmm, I know which one I would choose, because I have had enough of the liberal progressive destroy America tour.
Report Post »Treaty
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 9:10amUsed to like Christie. Now he comes across as another RINO.
Report Post »RJL
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 9:12amChristie, go eat another twinkie!!!!
Report Post »mllyjul
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 9:24amChris Christie is NOT A CONSERVATIVE. The only thing he has done that has everyone all excited, including Ann Coulter, is stand up to the unions. That’s it. Look at his stand on other issues and you will see he is not the conservative everyone thinks he is.
Report Post »PlowMan
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 9:53amThen I suggest that Christy teach Romney some of that fire and brimstone he uses! I like Gingrich because he is not afraid to tell it like it is. There are real problems in this country and we need to get a handle on it! It seams like Romney is not worried about these things when he has no fire in his breath when talking the issues. We are in a “tight spot”, as a movie character once said, and it is going to take some balls to get us out of it.
Report Post »DrFrost
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 10:29amI was paying attention when Newt was run out of the speakership. 83 of 84 charges dropped as a few have pointed out. Anyone with any brains knows exactly what that means… the establishment was out to get him and made up charges were enough to end his career because the common person would think “84 charges…. surely some of them must be true!”
He forced a balanced budget on a government that vehemently opposes them and made more than a few enemies. If a president is to do what the people really want (i.e. slash the federal government) he’s going to make a lot of enemies. Don’t think for a second that these people are above lying and fabricating evidence to keep someone from cutting their programs and blocking their agendas.
Look at his record. Check his rating with the ACU.
If the left despises him, he can’t be that bad. If the RINOs despise, he can’t be that bad.
Report Post »Katie
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 10:36amNewt is a progressive! Look at all of his actions & who endorses & all the past presidents & progressives that he constantly quotes. It’s just so obvious! People, do your homework!
Report Post »Cat
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 10:43am…
Report Post »Progressive, conservative, socialist, republican, democrat, communist, statist, call them what you want…
It’s ALL about OUR money and who gets to steal it
Wake up America
The IRS is the root of our problems, and it is quickly becoming a problem over the entire globe
Not ONE candidate has mentioned shutting down the IRS
Paulbots … NO he hasn’t, listen carefully, you’re being fooled
ltb
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 11:01amThe fact that Romney and his supporters spend more time attacking Gingrich than they do Obama, says all I need to know about Romney. I haven’t liked Christie since I found out that he’s a big (literally) believer in man-made global warming. At any rate, seeing as how Romney is the guy who lost to the guy who lost to Obama in 2008, you’d have to be a complete idiot to think he could get more votes than McCain in 2012 in light of the 2010 election, when true Conservatives swept the state governments and the House of Representatives.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 12:17pm@DrFrost,
“He forced a balanced budget on a government that vehemently opposes them and made more than a few enemies.”
Newt did not force a balanced budget. All they did was shuffle money around.
See here.
The Surplus Hoax
Report Post »http://mises.org/daily/542
afleetcommand
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 12:17pmListening to Rush..and he has it dead on. Newt is showing he will fight for us. Couldn’t care less about all that other crap at this point anymore . We are looking for a political soldier. He’s proving capable…if he continues..he wins.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 2:37pm@Cat,
“The IRS is the root of our problems, and it is quickly becoming a problem over the entire globe
Not ONE candidate has mentioned shutting down the IRS
Paulbots … NO he hasn’t, listen carefully, you’re being fooled”
The IRS is not the root of our problem – the central planning of the money supply is – but Ron Paul does absolutely want to abolish the IRS.
See here.
A Texas Platform for the GOP
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul201.html
“… Taxes? Texas Republicans urge the repeal of the 16th amendment and the abolition of the IRS, an agency the platform says is “Unacceptable to taxpayers.” On dozens of other issues, from abortion to activist judges to religious freedom, the Texas Republican party promotes true conservative values and strict adherence to the Constitution. Real conservatives should demand the same from the national Republican Party this week in New York.”
Report Post »duffy49
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 5:18pmOf all the candidates, I believe Newt should get it. Santorum would be a good VP. I’m no expert in the field, however, we need to get Obama out of office asap before we are doomed.
Report Post »Cat
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 5:29pmDoc >
Again, not one candidate has MENTIONED they will abolish the IRS if elected.
Even Paul wrote in the declaration you linked to.
“In Washington, the Federal Reserve System is virtually never discussed by Congress or the administration, despite its enormous impact on our economic well-being. Monetary policy is simply off the table as a political and policy matter for both national parties, but the Texas GOP recognizes the importance of sound money.”
Texas doesn’t control the IRS or the FR, DC does
Report Post »The IRS and the FR are interlinked … money, it’s ALL about stealing OUR MONEY!
windisea
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 5:40pmI will vote for Ron Paul only. He is the only constitutional conservative candidate, the only real Christian self-evident in the way he lives his life who will govern as Jesus taught. He is a true small government conservative and the only candidate with a substantive message. He will win Obama in the Presidential debates because Obama is a constitutional failure, an economic disaster and a war-mongering, civil rights destroying liar. Ron Paul will win the swing vote, democrats are switching party to vote for him and independents have confidence in Ron Paul above all the others. All the other candidates are more of the same, neo-cons, they are not true conservatives. Ron Paul’s policies represent real change and authentic constitutional conservatism. You know them by their fruit’s and I say yes to the Constitution, the ‘Golden Rule’ and Ron Paul 2012!
Report Post »HoHatch
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 5:46pmI agree with you , goodstuff, but JCannon is an embarassment.
Report Post »CobraBill
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 6:47pmIf Chris Christie is so great and thinks a governor should get the nomination, mybe he should off gotten of his lard azz and run himself.
Report Post »WeDontNeedNoSteenkinBadges07
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 7:27pm“Chris Christie: Gingrich ‘Has Been an Embarrassment to the Party’”
Whereas Christie does the Democrat Party proud. Christie, you’re the perfect jackass.
Report Post »So now, will some alleged Republican PLEASE beat up on marxist Obama and the Progressives (communists) Democrat?
WhereAreRomeysTaxReturns
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:47pmClearly the fact that Bishop Romney makes his $$$$ from firing hardworking american, and from “investing” in companies that have been convicted of medicare fraud is irrelevant to that slob Christie. It matters to us, thats why Bishop Romney got thumped in SC.
Christie will say ANYTHING to be Veep.
The final straw for me was reading that Bishop Romney bought his Mass. state laptop hard drives so there would be no evidence of what went on while he was governer there.
Does this sound like a moral person to you? Who on earth buys used laptop hard drives when you supposedly started STAPLES who sell them brand new???
What else is the Bishop hiding from us??
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:57pmChristie is a RHINO, in appearance and philosophy.
Report Post »jcannon98188
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:10pmPlease stop calling him “Bishop Romney” he has not been a bishop for many years, and there are TONS of bishops in the Mormon Church, there are 8 former bishops in my church service (about 300 active members) alone. It is hardly a high honor title the denotes leadership in the global church. He did his calling for a few years, and a new bishop was called, that is how we work.
Report Post »TTEXASTYLER
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:15pmSir, spurious and bigoted attacks score zero points for your side; they, in fact, damage your cause.
Report Post »PKama
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:23pm@ JCANNON98188..
Report Post »BISHOP ROMNEY !!!! That is what he is or was.Tell me then..why should we call him governor Romney if he is no longer a governor? I do not trust him..he is a moderate former bishop and governor who will compromise with the progressives in congress instead of standing up for the Constitution, just like what what the speaker of the house is doing right now.
WhereAreRomeysTaxReturns
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:24pmHuh??? Then why is he STILL called Gov Romney?
He’s was/is/will be/could be a Mormon Bishop.
Sounds very dubious that you still want people to call him Gov Romney well after he left office, yet not “Bishop Romney.”
Are you ashamed of this???
Report Post »Debbie1927
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:29pmAgain wake up. Newt=Obama. You guys are losing your minds. The liberals want Newt to run. You just don’t get it. Here comes another McCain election.
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:35pm@WhereAreRomeysTaxReturns –
No, we are not “ashamed” that Romney was called to serve as a Bishop – we just don’t want people such as the likes of you using any venacular associated with our Church. This is exactly why we don’t “cast our pearls before swine.”
Report Post »Jaycen
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:45pmRomney seems to be very Progressive, just like Newt does.
Unfortunately, Santorum has also supported some big government plans and espoused some spending-minded beliefs.
That leaves Ron “Why shouldn’t Iran get a nuke?” Paul. The man who scares the crap out of most Constitutional Conservatives. We’re back to choosing between the lesser evils.
I guess anybody-but-Obama has some kind of merit, but I’m not thrilled by my choices (yet a-freaking-gain). My vote is currently going to Santorum, but we’ll see.
Report Post »Salamander
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:59pmYou know, Venture Capital is a tough business–otherwise, a lot more people would be in it! It is NOT clear to me that Romney is a job-killer, like ‘Chainsaw Al’ of the 80′s, who dismembered more companies at the behest of their boards than Genghis Khan. I’m an MBA (Wharton) and think that with many of those ruined companies, had they done a capabilities assessment and markets assessment, they might have been able to redirect their failing businesses into a more productive area–but Chainsaw Al, not I got the job, and carried it out with vigor! One thing I noticed in business is that labor stays in place for the life of the company, but management often comes and goes (especially with shareholder owned companies, rather than family or founder-owned ones). This gives labor an ‘edge’ in union negotiations, with the strike as the show-stopper! If mangement were as free to ‘lock-out‘ as labor is to ’strike’, it would be a different game. So, over time, labor cuts a deal which can no longer compete in World markets. The only barrier left is tariffs, which distort the cost of goods! So, labor goofs up by being unrealistically greedy; management lets us down by being too lenient; and government lets us down by slamming the door, or opening the flood gates, to give the appearance of something good, to get reelected, rather than take the long-term approach of sitting down, arguing the points, understanding the problem and implementing a more realistic solution.
Report Post »booger71
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:03pmThis is exactly why we don’t “cast our pearls before swine.”
Report Post »——————————–
You mean like when Brigham Young moved the church to Utah several of the communities were set up as communes in which the church controlled all the wealth and doled it out as the leaders saw fit? Or how about blood atonement? There are thought to be more secret graves in the Great Salt Lake than in the desert around Vegas. Better go find a seer stone to find some more golden plates.
WhereAreRomeysTaxReturns
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:06pmThe Mormon trolls are on the prowl again here, blindly defending their Bishop.
Now they think that calling someone a Bishop – aka Bishop Romney – somehow is blasphemous to their “church”. That sounds mightly sensitive methinks, like they dont want his Mormon faith to be in the glare of the campaign.
Sorry, y‘all Mormons out there but if a person’s belief system and how they pray affects how they could run a country, then it MUST be highlighted and debated for all to see.
The voters of SC sure thought that the Bishop was not one of them rightous Christians, thats why they thumped him in the polls and kicked out Huntsman.
The rest of the country will soon have their turn.
Report Post »LightvsDarkness
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:33pmFYI, in the Mormon church, a Bishop is a temporary job or as the Mormons call it, “a calling”. Usually an individual serves as a Bishop between 5 to 6 years and then that calling ends, after which that individual is no longer addressed by that title, “Bishop”.
Report Post »Starkadder
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:35pmBishop? More like a pawn.
Report Post »LTinUT
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:36pmTo everyone but WHEREAREROMNEYSTAXRETURNS. Please ignore the troll. The use of Bishop within the context of a political discussion is for the purpose of mocking the man’s religion. Attacking religion is the tactic of the left. This person needs a lesson (among other things) in etiquette. If you are in a church meeting, it is appropriate to refer to Romney as Bishop Romney. Within a political situation, it is appropriate to refer to him as Governor Romney just as it is appropriate to refer to Gingrich as Speaker Gingrich or Santorum as Senator Santorum, or Paul as Congressman Paul. This person is shamefully and purposefully being disrespectful and spiteful in his/her condemnation of Romney and his religion. I think he/she needs a hug. Don’t you? :)
Report Post »WhereAreRomeysTaxReturns
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:28pmIf the Mormon church made this flipflopping, American-firing, Medicarefraud-investing, hard drive scrubbing, taxreturn-hiding , Mass. Moderate, Cayman Island-$tashing narcissistic excuse for a man a Bishop just because he donated millions to them, then the Mormons should undertake some serious introspection of themselves of their values and morals. From this side of the moral aisle, it looks very fishy.
MUCH much more dirt on The Bishop will come out very soon and will bring more shame on the Mormom Church and their decision to make him a Bishop.
The voters have seen thru his phony baloney this and rejected The Bishop/The Governor/The FlipFlopper in SC and Iowa. Floridians will do so soon.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:18pmMormons call it, “a calling”. Usually an individual serves as a Bishop between 5 to 6 years and then that calling ends,
Report Post »———
From a biblical perspective, it’s more like an appointment: “For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.” (Rom. 11:29)
tromso
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:58pmI guess you think it’s cute to call him “Bishop”, but it just tells most of us that you’re a bigoted POS.
Report Post »jcannon98188
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:25pmAs mentioned above, he is using the title “Bishop Romney” to dual hate on the Mormon Church, and Mitt Romney. Hate on Mitt all you want, can’t stand the guy. But he does not represent the views or the vote of Mormons. To the charge of Mitt paying his way into being a bishop, no one “wants” to be bishop. You end up giving up tons of your time helping everyone and getting very little time to work/spend with family/spend by yourself. It is a full time job in and of itself. It is a calling, because it can be quite the burden, especially since he would recieve no pay. It is not a high position of power like you would think. His would only preside over a few hundred people if that. Romney is not a person of power within the church, so end the hate and lies.
Report Post »Boulderite
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:37pmYou have no right to call Romney Bishop–you can call him Governor or Mr or Mitt but since you are not of his faith you haven’t the right to call him Bishop. And making fun of his faith is akin to racism. The man is a good Christian and hasn’t committed adultery like Gingrich or Cain or so many other members of Congress.
Report Post »reform
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 4:08amSalamander very excellent post as most people are not aware of the differences between venture capitalists and private equity firms. most people would do themselves a favor by going to Wikipedia punching in private equity firms and then analyzing what has taken place in America in the last 30 years or so. Recently economists just wrote in the Wall Street Journal how private equity firms supposedly saved America from brink of disaster but in reality the opposite has been true the private middle class has seen drastic reductions in revenue incomes. so if you take Bain capital which invests in medium to large corporations then restructures them which has been the loss of how many thousands of jobs in the recent 10 years, 10,000 and more at a time.
Report Post »Jack007
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:47pmChristie appointed a Moozlum to a judgeship position = Talk about being a naive embarrassment to human race.
Report Post »Roaran
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:55pmHere’s the problem. Chris Christie’s appointments do not detract from the fact that Newt Gingrich has a terrible record, as both a politician and as a human being. You can dodge the issue all you want, it will never change what Newt has done and what he has stood for. He is not a conservative, not politically, not personally. He is a progressive through and through. He likes big government, and he has an ego to match it.
Report Post »BoatFix
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:57pmFACT: Christie & Romney are as anti 2nd Amendment as Obama.
Report Post »No, I’m not a one issue voter, but this sort of factual record is telling… Very Telling.
I’ll forgive Gingrich for his past transgressions.
I’ve done some pretty exhaustive reading at his site, newt.org, and he has my vote.
UrsaMajor
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:08pmAt least Romney and Christie didn’t say that FDR was the greatest President of the 20th Century…. or praise Commie Union leader Andrew Stearn.
Report Post »Marine25
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:09pmHey Boatfix–how has the Second Amendment been attacked under this President?
Report Post »You must have been told he would, and they means he did.
You’re like the tea party crowd that went pin drop silent when each of them were offered 1000 dollars to show that there tax rate had gone up during Obama.
No one tried to collect.
But they did keep complaining about tax increases.
I’ll await your reply. For my money this President has protected my gun rights better than the last one.
jcannon98188
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:12pm@Marine
When was this $1000 offered? Cause I can easily show that taxes have gone up under Obama
Report Post »Stuck_in_CA
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:12pm@BoatFix Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:57pm
Report Post »Instead of many people at this site reading from Newt’s site, they‘ve formed an opinion of him through the MSM’s so-called reporting. When people finally get a chance to hear his words, from his mouth, they seem to change their minds about him. The Lame-streamers have poisoned the news, for decades.
It was sure fun this morning watching Karl Rove and all the rest of the Rockefeller Republicans and the leftists/commies fuming and squirming. Trying desperately to come up with a plan on how to derail the Newt train.
Tired of Code Names
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:21pm@BoatFix.. I like your post because you have actually done some homework. Newt was very popular when he forged a way to obtain the first republican majority in 50 years. Then he went to work on lowering taxes and welfare reform Both ideas were not popular with Bill Clinton and the democrats as well as the GOP progressive establishment. Fact. Nancy Peolis brought up those 87 “ethics” violations. All but one were dismissed as simply false and silly. Yet, after both the Dem progressives and GOP establishment progressives had invested so much into their smear of Newt, they had to pick one issue to stick with. Newt was exhonerated on every other one. Newt chose on the last one to do what many businesses do. It’s cheaper to settle than to fight. That’s where Newt was politically. He wanted to move forward and balance budgets. He paid a “fine” if you can call it that and then proceeded to balance budgets. With respect to Newt’s personal life and his ex wives, I know well enough that it takes BOTH sides of a marriage to break it up. I suspect Newt has fault in those marriages as well as do his ex wives. I certainly don’t have all the facts of those break ups and really, is it our position to judge. I simply read Newts positions on Newt.org. Agree with them and know that he has already went up against the democrats and the GOP establishment. This time, he has nothing to gain other than securing a better future for his grandchilden.
Report Post »hidden_lion
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:49pmHas the mohammedan Judge made a poor judgement? Has he implemented sharia law in his court? If he has not made any mistakes, what does it matter if the judge happens to be muslim?
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:00pm@Tired of Code Names
Great post! It seems you are one of the few that know the true history of Gingrich, instead of being one of many who just listen to the talking points of others. I didn’t realize that the mass smear campaign that has been imposed on folks like Sarah Palin, is a tactic that progressives have been using for so many years. Until I looked into the facts of Gingrich’s “ethics violations”. It‘s the same thing and it’s disgraceful that Christie and Romney are using the Dems dispicable tactic against one of their own……………..IMO
Which reminds me of Ann Colter. Can she possibly become anymore irrelevant to conservatives than she has made herself in the last couple of years?
Report Post »Tired of Code Names
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:43pm@Rational Man, Agree totally with you on Ann Colter. I used to like her. She’s a troll for whichever side of an argument that will sell her another book. With respect to Gingrich, it’s funny to see people post that Gingrich was for global warming, or that ethanol is bad (I don’t like it, but, it’s not a green environmentalist position). If you actually look at most of the legislation that Gingrich voted for, it is apparent that Newt conceded a few things to GAIN many things. Personally, I think Congress is going to be deadlocked for years to come if we as a people can’t figure out how to get the progressives out of their. They asked for compromise 50 years ago. Conservatives compromised. And now the progressives want us to compromise over and over again. I know a little bit about math. When you compromise on a position, say 50/50, you are half way from your core belief. If you compromise again, you are 25% away from your core belief. IF you compromise the third time your are 12.5% away from your core belief. That may be a bit dramatic, but, conservatives have compromised enough with the progressives. They need to compromise back in our direction. Everyone knows it. Why won’t anybody but Newt say it? $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:04pm@Tired of Code Names
Excellent point about compromise. Conservatives are trying to pull out of the downward spiral of compromising with the left to get things done. All that gets done anymore is the left wing agenda and conservatism is fading to the point of invisiblity. I think Gingrich has seen the writting on the wall and will stand firm for conservatism if in the White House. After all, standing firm on conservative principles in the ’90s is what put him in the crosshairs of progressive Dems and their smear campaignin the first place,(aka ethics violations).
Report Post »I am hoping that Gingrich will be bullish for conservatism if given the White House pulpit. As I see it, we’re not taking any more of a chance on Gingrich than we would if one of the others won……Except for Paul, of coarse. But we don’t have to worry ourselves about that since he will be retiring soon…………………
kryptonite
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:26pm@Marine25
how has the Second Amendment been attacked under this President?
For my money this President has protected my gun rights better than the last one.
———-
“…better than the last one,” huh? Ha! Liberal marine strikes again. Who do you think you’re fooling? You can find Obama’s EXTENSIVE anti-gun voting before becoming president all over the Internet. Did he do a 180 when he became president… just like that? Really??
Like his pro- abortion activism, Obama’s anti-gun agenda has been mostly stealth. You should know about that if you really are a marine, but it has gone way over your head. Even the Fast & Furious scandal didn’t raise a red flag. Hmm…
Report Post »http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/12/28/president-obamas-anti-gun-agenda-shows-no-sign-stopping/
arx
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:41pmmarine 25 you really need to go to the NRA websites and read up on what we can reasonably expect if Obamao gets a second term. I submit the following from same:
-Who has Obama appointed to the SCOTUS? Two of the most rabid anti-gunners he could find
-Within a week of his election in 08′ his transition team posted several elements of his gun ban agenda on the internet at change.gov, but then abruply deleted the webpage
-In 1996, Obama endorsed a total ban on the manufacture, sale and possession of all handguns.
-In 98, Obama endorsed a ban on the sale or transfer of all semi-autos
-in 99, Obama supported a 500% increase in federal taxes on ammo
-in 03′ Obama voted to ban even single shot, over under an side by side shotguns
-in 04′ Obama said the right to carry shoudl be banned nationwide…even going so far as to say you shouldn’t be allowed a gun in your own home for self defense.
-As an IL legislator, voted against a bill that would have exempted residence from prosecution for using a handgun for self defense in their own home
-In 2009, his attorney general, admited Obama wanted to ban semi-auto firearms.
-In 2010, top officials at the EPA said they had the power to impose a ban on lead ammunition.
-In 2011 the Interior Dept announced it was considering bans on target shooting on public lands.
-What was Fast and Furious was all about?
Obama knew the 2nd was too much to bite off during his first term, and is biding his time for when reelection is no long
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:55pmWhere did that word go?? Correction: “extensive anti-gun voting record.”
Report Post »fatjack
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:29pmMarine25
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:09pm
Hey Boatfix–how has the Second Amendment been attacked under this President?
I’ll await your reply. For my money this President has protected my gun rights better than the last one.
Report Post »____________________________________________
Marine25, there have several replies. What taking you so long to reply?
legendarytwo
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:47pmThen you better tell Mitt to drop the McCain look alike contest. Mitt will run a pathetic campaign like McCain . He won‘t lay a glove on Barac Obama’s personal circle of influence from people with anti american or christian values.
Report Post »bankerpapaw
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:46pmLet’s have a brokered convention and get Marco Rubio or Alan West or BOTH.
Report Post »Ducky 1
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:16pmLike!!!!
Report Post »justangry
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:26pmBoth voted for the NDAA. No thanks.
Report Post »enzomedici
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:54pmBoth voted for the NDAA and so that means they will sign away your rights just like anyone else. Any GOP member who voted for NDAA or The Patriot Act needs to be thrown out of office. Since hardly anyone stands up for the constitution anymore, it is clear that we need a 3rd party. The GOP is just as bad as the Democrats when it comes to destroying the Constitution.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 8:51pmJUSTANGRY BS! Allen West on NDAA: Military has NO right to detain US citizens or legal aliens – Also, SOPA http://www.therightscoop.com/allen-west-on-ndaa-military-has-no-right-to-detain-us-citizens-or-legal-aliens-also-sopa/
Report Post »pamela kay
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 12:36amI wish. BANKERPAPAW, I think Christie has his eye on the VP and Romney is his ticket. I really like West and Rubio too.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 1:51am@Republicorp, West says the right things, but he DID vote for it.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 1:58amhttp://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2011-375
Report Post »PITMASTER
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:46pmGovernor, what we don’t need in the Oval Office is another Progressive. You tell it like it is and so does Newt; your candidate has the personality of a can opener. Stay in Jersey fat boy and keep your pie hole closed.
Report Post »WhereAreRomeysTaxReturns
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:49pmThey would have to enlarge the white house doors and get bigger everything is that slob christie became veep.
What a waste of taxpayer money that would be. Thats enough for me to vote non-Mitt.
Report Post »UrsaMajor
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:09pmYou mean Progressives like Romney AND Gingrich, right?
Report Post »whatthehellbook
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:45pmI know Ron Paul won’t win Florida but I hope he does better than 10%. I don’t know why his appeal is so limited in the Southern states. Are my Southern friends that opposed to his foreign policy and the idea of living by the Golden Rule? I‘m from Georgia and I just don’t get it. Paul is fiscally conservative and stands for liberty and freedom.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=262l6tbHSlU
http://www.whatthehellbook.com/2012/01/17/to-hell-with-peace/
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:57pmI hate to say it, but a lot of my fellow Southerners are both Constitutionally and Economically ignorant….
Most of ‘em would rather vote for a serial adulterer that lives off of the government (i.e. Freddie Mac) as opposed to someone who consistently espouses the original principles and values of America’s Founding Fathers.
Report Post »rose-ellen
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:57pmThey want genocide against muslims. they are brainwashed sheep and the “good germans” of the 21st c.To dare say that we were attacked for our political policies in muslim lands is something they have not been allowed to even contemplate by the american genocidal media campaign against muslims.Good for ron paul for saying it every chance he gets.if he were a muslim they would have sent a drone out after him already. a bit of light shines through when he speaks about foreign policy.
Report Post »Micmac
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:01pmYes his foreign policies are very very dangerous – if he was in the 20th, much less the 21st century on foreign policy he’d have my vote in a heartbeat, but as he stands, I’m forced to look elsewhere.
NoBama 2012
Report Post »3monkeysmomma
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:03pmI can’t understand it at all. I used to bristle when people would suggest southerners were stupid.
Sadly, I may be starting to agree.
Gingrich may do really well in Florida because there are many Hispanics who will love his ideas on amnesty. Paul’s best bet is to turn out the college kids and there are many in Florida.
Report Post »islamhater
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:09pm@ROSE-ELLEN: What you fail to realize if ron paul was president in 2001 there would be no affganistan or pakistan today… They would have gotten lvl‘ed and stay’ed that way because after we lvl’ed it we would have left.. Oh i hope my name PISS’ES you off…….
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:45pmRon Paul the Democrat.
http://youtu.be/2J-oPqGCtW4
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:48pmIslamHater lol…
Though I think we would’ve leveled Afghanistan, then Saudi Arabia then maybe Pakistan if they were twitching the wrong way :D
Instead we get this compassionate, benevolent fake-conservatism that says to spend our money to rebuild other nations, meddle further in their politics and their neighbors and keep stirring the pot. It’s so amazing how the ignorant folk of our country swallow hatred as compassion and benevolence; war mongering as conservatism; power-grabbing as democracy; limited constitutional republican-ism as a throwback, less perfect than straight democracy and unfeasible.
Report Post »FreeManWalking
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:23pmPaul is skipping FL
Report Post »NotMyWay
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:52pmYou are oh, so pious about the Golden Rule. You don’t realise that the Golden Rule only works when BOTH SIDES live by it. The eastern, moslem mind does not work that way – they see the Golden Rule as a weakness of the west and will endeavor to exploit it at every possibility.
You can twist it any way you like it but Ron Paul’s Foreign Policy would be a disaster for the USA and would lead to World War faster than a strong horse foreign policy.
Report Post »Love_John_Galt
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:54pm@Time_2 — Is that the best you can do against Ron Paul? TOO Funny!
And for those that think any progressive (D or R) can continue the wasteful military spending should wake up. We are broke!! If we don’t stop the progressive craziness there will be nothing left to defend.
Win or lose this election, Ron Paul is making more of a positive difference in this country than all other candidates combined.
Report Post »oneshiner
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:06pm@three monkeys momma: Although I’ve only lived in the south a few years of my life, I consider everything about me a southerner. I love the south and the people.
My answer to the South is changing, it‘s because all the dam yankies come south and won’t go home
Report Post »StevoMiami
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:45pmYup, and Newt is a progressive… right…. cause every progressive wants to lower taxes to 15% and abolish the death tax… oh yeah.. all the earmarks of a progressive.. plllllease…
Report Post »Roaran
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:58pmNewt Gingrich 2012 is saying, 15% flat tax. I remember 2007 Barrack Obama saying he was going to close Gitmo. It’s a farce, look at their actions, what they DID. Newt supported an individual mandate, and he was pro-government action against climate change.
Report Post »UrsaMajor
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:12pmHe praised HIMSELF as a Wilsonian… that‘s pretty f’n Progressive!
Report Post »hidden_lion
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:55pmNewt supports the patriot act and wants to strengthen it, he supports NDAA, Newt wants the government to have more power. Newt does not support the constitution or liberty. Newt has no morals. All you Newt voters probably hated Bill Clinton for doing the same things Newt and will do. You might as well vote democrat.
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:14pm@roaran..might want to investigate your claims just a bit and get the full context before spewing the uninformed talking points. Try researching to find transcripts or videos of entire conversations / speeches regarding these topics rather than sound bites and the parroting of others opinions of opinions of the opnions of someone who heard part of whatever it is
Report Post »maryjsteng
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:38pmYup.. Newts a progressive and he knows Big Foot personally.. and I have the proof! Is there someplace here on ‘coast to coast/politics’ that I can send it?
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:43pmAll the GOP insiders who knock NEWT don’t get it. We have to defeat OBAMA, not mirror him. NEWT will DEFEAT him. Romney is just more status quo with a large war-chest. I personally think that GOD saved Newt just for this time. I see him like CHURCHILL…. thinkaboutit.
Report Post »GoodStuff
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:47pmNewt won’t beat Obama. Snap out of it. He has more baggage than Helen Thomas’ face.
Report Post »BoatFix
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:59pmI agree 110%!
Report Post »Roaran
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:01pmIf the number one issue is beating Barrack Obama, and you do not like Mitt Romney, sorry to say, but Ron Paul is #2 in that regard.
But I guess Ron Paul is ‘unelectable’ to conservatives for some reason. George Washington would probably be considered unelectable to the Americans today.
Report Post »jmging
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:26pmIt will be tough to beat Obama regardless. But if you really believe Mitt has a better shot than Gingrich you are dead wrong. For better or worse(worse), people are fired up about “financial inequality”, Obama is going to push that issue and depend on the passion it incites. Electing Romney is playing directly into BHO’s hands. You’ll have Obama, a master orator/manipulator vs a billionaire who stumbles on his words and pays “somewhere around 15% in taxes”. Newt isn’t quite the orator that Obama is, but he has 10x the knowledge, the ability to articulate that knowledge, he has experience, and is as close to matching Obama‘s slick tongue as you’ll find. If there was ever a bad time for a billionaire word fumbler to rep the GOP it’s now. If there was ever a time when America could care less about personal past issues of a candidate, its now. The number of Cable TV viewers has exploded in the past 3.5 years, as has the ability to watch TV material online when it is missed. The debates WILL be the most important aspect of the Presidential Election. And for those clinging to this belief that Romney can get Moderate voters, Romney is a SOCIAL MODERATE, and a fiscal conservative billionaire. Just as will be the case on the right and left this year, for moderates social issues will be left in the background noise as fiscal and financial issues will be what matters. Gingrich can say he’s balanced the budget, that he’s worked with Reagan, and he can improvise in debates whe
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:12pmIt isn’t like Obama won by a landslide against McDillweed and Obama has some baggage too
Report Post »moussiagilda
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 10:18pmIt won’t be hard to defeat Obama. Why? Because we can’t stand him. Need another reason?
Don‘t worry about Newt’s negatives. He’s got an adorable mind, and you forget his arrogance once you listen to his ideas. They say he has too many ideas. I’ve been told that. It’s not an insult.
Report Post »atrain
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:43pmBoth Romney and Gingrich are big government center-left candidates. Once again the conservative voter has to decide who sucks the least.
Report Post »JoeA1010
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:19pmExactly. I like Paul except for his foreign policy and the fact he simply can’t win. So we’re stuck with guys who reflexively look for a government “solution” to every so-called problem that exists. It’s frustrating. Very frustrating.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:16pmRon Paul can’t claim purity when it comes to corporate subsidies. The Washington Post reported that he pressed the U.S. energy secretary in 2008 to approve a federal loan guarantee to expand a nuclear facility in Texas.
This contradicts statements Paul made in his 1981 book “Gold, Peace, and Prosperity,” in which he slams federally guaranteed loans, calling them “the most significant contributing factor to our inflation.”
Paul insists that the government should let the free market determine how energy is produced. He told the left-leaning Grist magazine in 2007 that research and development subsidies “are bound and determined to always misdirect money to political cronies,” and he criticized the federal government for providing ethanol subsidies.
Paul tried to help certain industries by co-sponsoring legislation that included tax credits. One bill from 2011 promised $5 billion in credits to the natural gas industry. Another measure from 2009 promoted fuel efficiency with a $2,000 deduction for individuals who swapped gas guzzlers for fuel-efficient cars.
Report Post »As for earmarks, the congressman requested at least $157 million for fiscal year 2011, and another $398 million for fiscal year 2010, according to his congressional Web site. The provisions included $2.5 million for a “Historic Downtown Redevelopment Project” in Baytown, Texas; $8 million for replacing recreational fishing piers damaged during hurricanes; and $18 million for ship canal operations
Rob
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:42pmChris Christie should lose some weight, it is a distraction… I don’t really care, but whenever one watches him it is sure on the mind.
Report Post »Jack007
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:50pmFat people are lazy and their ass smells and that’s a fact jack.
Report Post »mycomet123
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:00pmJACK007, How do you know that fat person’s ass smells, unless you smell it. (Sorry I couldn’t resist).
Report Post »WhereAreRomeysTaxReturns
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:02pmChristie as Veep would bankrupt the nation just from his Burger King takeouts.
Report Post »fatjack
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:17pmJack007
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:50pm
Fat people are lazy and their ass smells and that’s a fact jack.
________________________________________________-
What are you talking about, boy?
Report Post »ENOUGHISENOUGH
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:41pmReagan didn’t have any experience creating jobs and look at what he accomplished.
Christie, just words, just speaches against Newt.
Report Post »Steelhead
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:45pmIran contra was wonderful . Negotiating with the terrorist is the Reagan legacy
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:51pmLook what Newt did though:
——————————————-
Report Post »“Gingrich: NAFTA Worked Because It Created Jobs In Mexico”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3GcnHe9wDY
wilsonj72
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:06pmSteelhead get it right! Dem supported the Commie not Reagan. Reagan destroyed your Commie friends.
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:04pmSince first entering Congress, Newt has put the interests of American entrepreneurs, producers and consumers first, as he supported the historic Reagan tax cuts, then went against many in his own party to oppose the George Bush and Clinton tax hikes. When the North American Free Trade Agreement in came up for a vote in 1993, Newt recalled the words of Ronald Reagan in 1979: “A developing closeness among Canada, Mexico, and the United States–a North American accord–would permit achievement of that potential in each country beyond that which I believe any of them, strong as they are, could accomplish in the absence of such cooperation.”
Report Post »Although controversial at first, NAFTA has created vast new opportunities for American producers and consumers. In the first fifteen years after NAFTA’s passage, U.S. industrial production rose 57% and unemployment averaged 5.1%. In the decade preceding the trade agreements, industrial production only rose 28% and unemployment average 7.1%.
WAKEUPUSA2012
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:23pmLOL U think NAFTA is good?
I live in Texas. Naftta is a JOKE. What do you think has caused this giant sucking sound in our economy? It lets the illegals come here and drives down jobs in there own country. It has helped destroy our housing market. It sends good jobs that where here outta the country.
This of course is what they want.
They want to destroy the economy (country) so they can bring in there NWO.
CFR
trilateral
Bohemian Grove
Boo
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:39pmSTEELHEAD only in your sad dark world. But a commie or Lib would think that way. He freed more people from the shackles of communism than and other man………and that is a fact. But thanks for the laugh TinFoilHead
Report Post »Rob
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:40pmOoops, Christie bet on the wrong horse and is thinking some sour grapes.
Chris, you didn’t get in. Newt did, and he is reflecting the ANGER that Romney smiles through.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:50pmChristie can taste that VP spot…….
Report Post »ENOUGHISENOUGH
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:39pmI finally made my mind up. I’m voting for Newt. Christy is not a Conservative. He has great comebacks and can think quick on his feet, but so can Newt. Romney can in no way beat Obama in a debate because he just sees Obama as a nice man that is in over his head and that could not be further from the truth.
Obama is a Marxist plain and simple and is out to destroy the US period. The only person Romney protects is Obama and he goes after Replicans with a vengence. Romney acts all innocent on stage about the attacks but he knows about them and I think he is lying about not knowing.
Report Post »notmeatglennbeckdotcom
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:39pmOh. I see. But the gravy stain on his tie is okay?
Keep eating your own Republicans and no one will want ANY of you come November.
Report Post »notmeatglennbeckdotcom
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:46pmSorry for using “Eat” in a story about Christie. My bad!
Report Post »PJL
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:39pmNewt, is nothing more than a angry, little 3 timing troll.
Report Post »islamhater
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:39pmSaid one progressive to the other…Progressive‘s fight’ing over another progressive..Ask christie how he feel‘s about gun right’s.. He is no constitutionist..Use executive power he say’s.. Does he mean like Obama has done???? What about congress???
Report Post »Darla_K
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 10:51amGood point..
Report Post »LTinUT
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:38pmPeople tend to make decisions based on emotion, then spin logic to justify the decision. This may work in the short term but eventually, just like with Obama, it becomes buyer’s remorse. Newt riled up emotion better than any other candidate. Before making a decision, be open to all available facts, think critically, and keep emotions in check. Newt = another buyer’s remorse situation.
Report Post »Titania
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:43pmTrue- the primary is when we need to be very critical and choose well. No Newt!!
Report Post »Titania
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:46pmTrue! NOW is the time to be critical and look beyond mere rhetoric- look at words, and deeds, and records- not ‘spin’ and paid PAC stuff. Let’s be smart and choose more than a debater and legislator but a do-er! NO NEWT!!!
Report Post »PJL
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:37pmChristie’s got that right.
Report Post »bikermama
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:41pmActually, he doesn’t. Newt was not fined, but volunteerily helped pay the cost for the letter he signed by his lawyer which he himself asked his fellow Republicans to “find him quilty” of to end all the bs violations the Dems had on him. What was it like 84 violations and he was cleared of 83, and gave up fighting on the last one to get back to governing. I hate how history is constantly re-written in this country. And when Newt gets the nomination, Christy just gave the Obama admin a nice commercial….good job Chris, add to the lies that Obama will be more than happy to pursue.
Report Post »lwillis59
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:17pmall you Newt lovers should at least wipe the “kool-aide”from your mouth before you all speak…maybe you would be taken a little more seriously..
Report Post »Lloyd Drako
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:57pmWe have Juan Williams and John King to thank if this bloated creature becomes president. (I mean Gingrich, not Christie.)
Newt did not surge in SC at the last minute on his own merits, but through the timidity of his media interlocutors, proof that it is not media hostility but media incompetence that matters.
Williams should have rounded on Gingrich: “Don’t you realize that most food stamp recipients are white? or that many actually have jobs?”
King’s task was way simpler: “Then why did you declare Clinton unfit to be president in 1998? You claim to be a changed man. Very well, do you admit that you were a huge hypocrite and no better than the man you persecuted for a year, wasting Congress‘ and the nation’s time?” And: “Are you calling your ex-wife a liar?”
That should have done it.
Report Post »reform
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 3:55amDrako it doesn’t matter if the person black white or Asian the fact remains the economy is in the tank which therefore leads to more dependency on the government, so therefore he is in fact the foodstamp president race aside stop throwning race in the mix. And as far as ex-wives go I have three neighbors who recently just got divorced as well as my nephew and guess what they have in common? I’m not saying that women are bad (as men) can be just as misleading towards the development of why the divorce took place.
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:35pmREALLY???? Did you pick the wrong horse, CHRIS? Seems like it. NO we don’t need another legislator, we need a tiger who knows how to get rid of and abolish the junk that Obama has created. Mitt doesn’t ring true, Dude…he’s not like you ….he’s like a little boy “pleaser” who says something and then stands by with this S-eating grin like “See what a good boy I am ” look on his face…or a condescending “I’m so good to the little people ” Look. GET BEHIND NEWT. WE ARE.
Report Post »Titania
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:47pmNo we aren’t- Newt is a has been
Report Post »Run n Gun
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:18pmhow can one govern a nation who can’t first govern himself?? Adultery, Cheating??
Report Post »toto
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:34pmRino, nuff said.
Report Post »LibertyGoddess
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:34pmI agree. Newt is an embarrassment and so are the people who support him. The motive behind supporting him is shameful too.
Report Post »Rob
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:41pmI support him because I think he might HATE the president as much as many of us do.
Report Post »WhereAreRomeysTaxReturns
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:52pmWhy did the Bishop BUY his Mass. state laptop hard drives so there would be no evidence of what went on while he was governer there.
Does this sound like a moral person to you? Who on earth buys used laptop hard drives when you supposedly started STAPLES who sell them brand new???
Report Post »WheretheheckRwe
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:01pmLet me guess…you believe that to be…..Racism??
Report Post »Kristy
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:10pmWhat is the motive? Here is my “motive.”
I have always agreed with almost everything Beck has said. I love his ability to bring news to the people that the MSM just won’t or refuses to cover. But on Gingrich, Beck and I disagree. My eyes were opened the last presidential cycle to how I had been manipulated for all of my life by the MSM. I saw how Palin was absolutely crucified by the media and Obama got a total pass. I see how the MSM totally ignores Fast and Furious, wasted stimulus money, Solyndra, the pipeline, etc. Gingrich is the first candidate who is actually saying what I have wanted my candidates to say…what I have been feeling for the last 3 years. Romney is just like McCain. He won‘t say anything we haven’t already heard from a politician. I also don’t trust Romney to get rid of Obamacare. I don’t think he will really try to repeal, only let the states get out of the mandates.
I feel that the MSM is our biggest problem. Until they are fully exposed as being an arm of the democratic party, it is too hard for conservatives to move forward. I believe Newt’s place is to expose the MSM for what they are. In addition, Newt was able to get Clinton to sign welfare reform and at least have a so called “balanced budget.”
I‘m sorry I’m an embarrassment to you, but with the field of crappy choices we have, I just have to go with what I see as the biggest problem, which is the MSM not reporting the truth or at least both sides. They n
Report Post »NarnianWarrior
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:59pm@LibertyGoddess
Are you being serious or delusional? I’d like to know who you think might be a better candidate than Newt? Give me a break! Let’s look at the facts instead of spewing nonesense? As far as I can gather, there are only 4 candidates left; Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, and Paul. Most of us would agree, that really this race is among the top tier candidates, which means Paul has no chances irregardless of what the Paulbots in this forum think. He’s irrelevant and should go away.
Second, while I might agree with Santorum on values, there are certain issues that he’s got to address before he can win enough votes to overtake Romney. In my view, he should drop out now, but if he doesn’t that fine. I think it will only help Newt in the long term.
Now the race is clearly between Romney and Newt, so based on your comments I we can assume that you are throwing your support for the former? Is that correct? Otherwise, you‘re a nut and your voice shouldn’t matter. Lastly, if you think the Romney such a great candidate, then tell us why. I just can’t see how anybody can get around his habitual flip-flopping. That should bother you more than any mistakes that Newt has done.
Report Post »fatjack
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:38pmKristy
Applause , that was one more articulate post. Thanks.
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:26pmHates the President lol. Newt been in the Government for how long? There all the same Idiots. Obama is bad.. yes we all know it but it’s not all him, He is a puppet being Controlled by who????? DO YOU THINK ???
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:33pmI thought Chrissy didn’t want to get involved?? And he spews the half truths propogated against Newt? E Tu Chrissy?
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:38pmIf I were as obese and out of shape as that RHINO, I would keep my mouth shut… for more reasons than one!
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:46pmWhy?
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:20pmJust like Glenn Beck…. He was gonna stay out of Politics… boy did he tell a fat one there! I can not even listen to him any more, I have had to take a break!
Report Post »Red Meat
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:32pmChris Christie is an embarrassment so he should know.
Report Post »NarnianWarrior
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 12:28pm@Red Meat
You’re absolutely right! He’s the waterboy for the GOP establishment. He’s fresh meat rookie looking to make a name for himself within their ranks. Isn’t that how you advance in most gangs?
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on January 24, 2012 at 9:26amHe and all of his doting followers like Ann Coulter have been completely exposed for what they are.
Report Post »Lloyd Drako
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:32pmChristie hasn’t gone far enough. Gingrich is an embarrassment to the Republican Party, the conservative movement, American politics, the profession of history, the male gender, and the human species..
Report Post »cassandra
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:41pmDranko ( Thank You ) you are spot on newt is part of the liberal progressive politcal machine, if he wins, the big government agenda WILL continue his vote gave us the Dept. of Ed he is unethical,arrogant and defiant I believe he is a plant for the progressive party
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:41pmI agree.
Report Post »WhereAreRomeysTaxReturns
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:06pmChristie is an embarresment to anyone who eats normally.
That fat slob makes me ill everytime I see his hulk on TV
Report Post »Debbie1927
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:35pmThanks. Someone who has common sense!
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:39pmagree drako
Report Post »reform
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 4:17amYou should go to YouTube and search Mitt Romney 1994 in his own words proclaiming he’s a moderate Republican and a progressive look it up stop the nonsense. And please give me any references to Newt Gingrich last known affiliation dates meetings etc. with the CFR? What transpired in South Carolina if you look at all the exiting polls then apparently over 2.5 million voters in essence what you people say are bigots correction only the 40% that voted for Newt Gingrich. So 73% of the populace on this blog believe that South Carolina citizens are bigots.
Report Post »reform
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 4:36amDepartment of Education was started I believe in 1979 under the Carter administration. Herein lies the problem the first Bush Mr. Bush wanted to keep it in place but the majority of the Republicans wanted to put it back into a cabinet position under the Department of Interior.
Report Post »flanny
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 1:42pmAmen
Report Post »