Chris Matthews Grills GOP Chair: Wouldn‘t it Be ’Scary‘ to Have ’Anti-Intellectual’ Creationist as President?
- Posted on August 19, 2011 at 8:47pm by
Tiffany Gabbay
- Print »
- Email »
Despite the nation’s serious financial woes, it seems MSNBC’s Chris Matthews has more pressing concerns on his mind — namely that it would be unthinkable to have a president that doesn’t believe in evolution or climate change.
During Friday’s interview with Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus, Matthews recalled a statement made by Jon Huntsman, in which the presidential hopeful stated he believed in evolution. That’s when Matthews launched in, asking Priebus:
“Aren’t you worried, though, that in a world where we have to compete with science, in science and technology with Chinese and Indian young geniuses, and some of them move here, and some that are still over in their countries around the world, we‘re competing in a world of science and technology to be a country that might be led by someone who doesn’t believe in evolution? Who doesn’t believe in climate change? Who doesn’t believe in the scientific community of his own country, the National Academy of Science, for example, on climate change? Wouldn’t that be kind of scary to have somebody who is so anti-intellectual as president?”
The banter between the two polar opposites continued for nearly ten minutes, getting rather heated at certain points. Priebus criticized President Obama for taking a vacation in Martha’s Vineyard during a time when the nation’s finances are in ruin, while a typically irate Matthews pressed Priebus to admit that Obama “walked into hell.”
Watch the fiery Harball exchange below.
(H/T: Mediaite)




















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (306)
Cold War Vet
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:36pmWho cares? When Chris Matthews speaks, people DON’T listen…
Report Post »Rightsofman
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:55pmWouldn‘t it be scary if Chris’ idea of a good President got into office. Oh Chris I think Washington, Jefferson, Adams, Lincoln and my guess is several other POTUS were creationists and they did OK ya Know.
Report Post »Ruler4You
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 10:00pmThe question seems like an oxymoron coming from Mathews
Report Post »Rightsofman
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 10:03pmCOLD WAR VET We should care because Chris is an “intellectual” news comm……er Bamafile hand puppet….and he knows how the universe was created for darn sure. darn it!
Report Post »In The Right
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 10:08pmChris Matthews a Liberal douche of the highest order, worse in fact then the prancing limp-wristed Alan Colmes. I wonder whether “Tingle up his leg” Matthews masturbates to large screen images of his “savior” Obama before, during, and after broadcasts.
Report Post »Grey Eagle
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 10:13pmI agree Chris Matthews is a radical loon who is trying to protect Obama. Who the heck cares.
Report Post »LadyGOP
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 10:24pmBe Afraid You Nut Job Mathews. You have reason to fear Perry.
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 10:30pmReince Priebus minus the vowels= RNC PR BS~says it all :^)
Report Post »In The Right
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 10:44pmTifosa, It figures you chose a “fairy” as an avatar it’s quite fitting to portray your condoning of a twisted agenda. Shouldn’t you be watching you fellow limp-wristed pal Anderson Cooper on CNN? I’m sure you tune into the carpet-munching Rachael Maddow every night.
Report Post »izzy1127
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 10:58pmIs anyone having problems logging in to GBTV tonight? I continue to get a server error.
Report Post »snidley-whiplash
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 11:29pmOh so true……..what was that name again?????????????
Report Post »VF21Freelancer
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 11:31pmHey dimwit, the “theory” of evolution was developed in the mid 1800s. So none of our founding fathers believed in your Satanic nonsense. Why don’t you do the mathematical calculation on just how many mutations (ALL beneficial by the way) it would have taken to get from a lightning struck pile of ooze to a human, divide that by the number of years you claim life has been on the earth and calculate how many mutations per year would be required to account for just human life let alone all life. If your “theory” were true, human life would be mutating (All beneficially by the way) sever times a day.
There are an estimated 10 million species on earth all with thousands of unique cells, processes, chemicals, functions, etc. Now take into account that for all but the most basic life forms mutations are detrimental to the life form. Simple observation and 3rd grade math proves your “theory” false.
YOU ARE A FOOL.
Report Post »INOGAWD
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 12:28amObama “walked into hell.” OK, I agree,..He campaigned for the job
Report Post »with promises of “Hope and Change” had the WH, the Senate and
The House for two years……everything they did turned out to be
desasteroius..Pelosi and Reid were in charge during the 110th and
111th Congress. spent Tax Dollars like Drunking Sailors, and they
never mention them..Tingles has a very short memory…..
common_cents
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 12:36am@VF21Freelancer
I can‘t tell if you’re just trolling or you actually believe what you just wrote constituted a rational argument…
The science of genetics is undeniable. You don’t need to look any further than how humans have domesticated some species of animals using selective breeding and that only took a few generations.
jb.kibs
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 12:36amyep, the planet most likely could not have been in the ‘window of life’, the sweet spot in the orbit, long enough for us to evolve from an amoeba. we are already getting to far away from the sun because it’s losing mass.
the big bang theory is the most illogical theory to date. “nothing exploded nothing which formed everything.” that is the big bang to me. there could NOT have been anything there to start with. what put it there? GOD can be that only answer. you fools… it’s always going to end in GOD. LOL. we can always ask, what put THAT there?! where did the first SEED come from, the very first seed, and what was that seed?! answer that…. all science dies in a black hole, yet God still remains.
we have more records over a longer course of time pointing to a Creator. here‘s what i don’t get.
Report Post »we create life daily within labs, and we are mortal humans. you don‘t think it’s possible for a more an advanced creatue to have created us? and you believe in science?! just asking…
Shiroi Raion
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 12:44amMatthews is a blubbering anti-intellectual. That aside, if Matthews believes believers are anti-intellectual then he must believe Obama and all other Democrats that went to church or quote the bible are just making dishonest political maneuvers. So he’s okay with dishonest politicians, but not with anyone who chooses creation theory over evolutionary theory? Personally, I choose honesty in people in positions of power. I don’t really care which theory they believe.
Report Post »I witnessed a study between Democrats and Republicans firsthand. It involved over 1000 Democrats and 1000 Republicans and they asked about 20 fairly difficult questions to test their knowledge. The results were exactly the same. Both groups had the same percentage of correct answers. Neither proved to be any smarter than the other.
Although, I would bet Romney is both more intelligent than Matthews. Matthews seems rather dimwitted to me.
fastfacts
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 1:06amNO IT WOULD BE WORSE TO HAVE AN ATHEIST OR SOMEONE THAT PANDERS TO ATHEISTS…
Here is why, not all atheists, but most that I have known, atheists dislike believers and feel pressure against their beliefs, whether Christians put pressure or not. Automatically it is the Christians fault for any persecution that comes their way.
Obama doesn’t just pander to atheists, he panders to Muslims and other faith besides ‘his own.’ This is more dangerous because he does more to make them happy and support those than etiher being completely fair to all or starting to persecute the majority… the Christians.
Look at this atheist campaign to beat up Christians: http://url2it.com/grsn . I haven’t seen Christians attack atheists directly just trying to spread the message without attacks.
Report Post »INOGAWD
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 1:07am@ tifosa
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 10:30pm
Reince Priebus minus the vowels= RNC PR BS~says it all :^)
WOW !! Stay up all night figuring this out..Cool, I think
Report Post »RNC PR BS handled The Intellectual quite well.. HMMM ??
ashestoashes
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 1:08amHey Mr. Chris Matthews Tingle down your leg in the presence of Obama. I hate to offend your delicate sensibilites, but science has already proven that the “climate change” is not caused by man. God set it up that way. “God” also created most of us….well come to think of it..he also created “monkeys” like you. You will get to meet Him someday. He will “rock” your world. It’s quite possible that you will see what real “climate change” is all about.
Report Post »1TrueOne55
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 3:17amHey Chris the true science says that the earth is rotating and tilting on different degrees of inclination and that at 25,000 years it makes a big change and we are close to that 25,000 year shift. And since these Matthews certified “Scientists” believe in the Mayan version of the 2012 Life Extinction Event known as the end of the “Calendar” and since that is what were up against I guess that means that only those smart enough to store food for years of survival will be allowed to live in the years following the End of the World Mayan Calendar.
Report Post »vtxphantom
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 6:18am@izzy1127
Had the same problem. I had to do the forgot password option. They will send a new password and that should get you in. Looks like the web site has been redesigned. Hope that helps.
Report Post »HumbleMan
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 6:49amIf he’s a job creationist, then yeah!
I love it when ideologues hijack words like “intellectual”. It now means to their pea-brain script for living, “those who think liberal”. Now there’s a real oxymoron!
Report Post »chazman
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 7:08amI feel as though I save Chrissy‘s life every time I DON’T watch him! Because when I do watch him, I wanna go to NY and kill him!
Report Post »Marcobob69
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 8:06amChris is afraid he would no longer have that special feeling going up his leg anymore if the “love of his life” gets the boot next November! Ah, Chris, the gaiety of it all……..
Report Post »Insuranceman
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 8:10amOnly a Republican can be proud of a lack of knowledge in science, history, economics, and culture. Oh well it probably is all magic.
Report Post »Rice Water
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 9:07amIt’s a stupid argument. Any practical, marketable scientific/technological advancements have nothing to do with evolution or climate change. For example, the USB port. A simple device that has changed our lives, but do we ask if Ajay Bhatt believes in ID or global warming before we use it?
My position on ID has always been that it takes the easy way out, essentially stating that things are too complicated for us to understand, so why bother? When ID produces some useful insights instead of just pointing out/propagandizing current problems with evolution theory, I’ll gladly look into it.
Report Post »old white guy
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 11:19amchrissy, what’s real scary is having a dimwit, half black , half white, all commie in the white house.
Report Post »old white guy
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 11:24amcommon cents. who selectively bred humans????
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 11:33amIf you want to see a lib/athiest/progressive, mess in their pants and run away crying, challenge them to a creation vs evolution debate in front of highschool age student. Tell them you will give equal time to speak, and time to prepare. They will never take you up on it. they have no species in transition, it violates the second law of thermodynamics, it can not be explained with genetics, the fossil records do not back them up. Darwin’s ideas were false, and they know it. In nature animals only adapt within the genetic makeup they alrady have. Mutations never help the animal, they usuall kill it.
They love to call themselves the intelectuals, but they are foolish. They always revert to name calling, and condescending behavior, because they have not arguement.
Hey there Chris, check out this quote from your annointed one. “And it was through that experience, working with pastors and laypeople, trying to heal the wounds of hurting neighborhoods, that I came to know Jesus Christ for myself and embrace him as my Lord and Savior.” Directly from the mouth of Obama. Tell me this, If Obama believs in the savior of the Bible, would he not always have to believe in creation? Why are you not up in arms over this? Why does this not infuriate you that same as if a conservative said the same quote.
Libs are fake. You notice they will not say similar comments to a muslim, and they shy away from ever knocking the religiion of African Americans.
Report Post »bigjohn7187
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 2:35pmEvery time chris matthews speaks a puppy dies
Report Post »AOL_REFUGEE
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 3:03pmChrissy should rename his show from HARDBALL to HAIRBALL. It’s much more accurate and indicative of its level of substance and value. Hairball with Chris Mattthews. Yes. I like that. Why, he’s got a hairball caught in his throat right now! If only he would choke on it.
Report Post »Rice Water
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 6:03pmYou hit the nail on the head, Ranger: no serious scientist would ever debate a Creationist, for the same reason they wouldn’t debate a follower of The Spaghetti Monster. Again, if Creationists/IDers can use their ideas to come up with useful, productive, applicable theories instead of just pointing out problems with evolution theory, I would be delighted to listen to them.
Report Post »nptden
Posted on August 21, 2011 at 4:30amMore scary having a Marxist/ Mulatto/ POTUS presently, who is allied with Islamist’s. They have Hillary in the wings, for the next election. Time to kid out all the progressive socialists and their legions of illegal immigrants and racist organizations. Also time to eliminate the cohorts of media who support their cause like this boob.
Report Post »AWAKENEDAWARE
Posted on August 21, 2011 at 8:40amThe “HARDBALL” on this show is lodged firmly between Matthews’ ears. What a pile of steaming crap with legs. I hope he finds a great job as a 3rd shift manager at Mickey D’s when MessNBC goes bankrupt. Ohhhh, that’s right, they will NEVER go bankrupt as long as Obummer is Pres, cuz the Fred can print paychecks for everyone forever YAY! I have a tingle on my leg.
Report Post »Pujols
Posted on August 21, 2011 at 4:33pmChris, Do you mean like the other 43 before Obama?
Report Post »Vanbars
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:34pmThe more I hear Chris Matthews, the more I believe evolution has yet to begin – at least for him. I think we who read The Blaze are the only folks who pay much attention to him. We should all just stop, but listening to a liberal trying to be “intellectual” is just too much fun, so keep it up, Chris – we need you for free entertainment.
Report Post »GeorgieJo
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 10:01pmGOOD point VAN!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »Recursion
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 10:30pmExcellent point Van. It hurts my head when he speaks but it is great entertainment to listen to some of these umm…people
Report Post »INOGAWD
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 12:36amAll these OBMSNBC BOZOS make my eyes water..
Report Post »but like you say, the’re good comedy relief…..
common_cents
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 1:10am@HOMESCHOOLMAMA
Report Post »First you say that “cell reproduction has an automatic fact checker and removes any mistakes” Then you say
“ Any mistakes in DNA synthesis that manage to make it into a living creature are not to the benefit of the species but to its detriment”
So you are saying that mutations can occur, but they can only have negative effects for the species. And, due to the “fact checking” mechanism they only occur extremely rarely, correct?
Two questions:
1) If you admit that mutation can and does occur, what insures that it is detrimental to the species?
2) How do you explain bacteria that becomes resistant to antibiotics?
mils
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 4:06ami dont’ understand why he still has a job….
Report Post »stablepar
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 9:10ami wonder what matthews evolved from and what he thinks he is evolving into
Report Post »Mil-Dot
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 12:59pmYou see, I do not care what he says and do not subject myself to the viewpoints of a person who hates his own race. I really don’t care what color a person is-green, black, purple, brown, tan, I don’t care. So, I don’t listen to whack job lib commies. It only makes a person mad and that affects your health. I wish the Blaze would quit featuring him EVERY SINGLE DAY, it gets old looking at his face.
Report Post »mrnoparty
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:29pmIf having such a closed minded left wing ideologue as Matthews rant daily on TV spewing his unsupportable anti-intellectual thinking and trying to pass it off as news does not scare Americans, then a creationist is certainly not going to scare anybody.
Report Post »INOGAWD
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 12:53amThought Priebus did a GREAT JOB with Crissie(The Intellectual)..
Report Post »MODEL82A1
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:29pmIf you deny evolution, you are a fool. In America, you have the absolute right to be a fool and I will fight to the death for your right to believe and say foolish things.
Report Post »RoBoTech
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:42pmI deny Creationism.
Report Post »It’s called the THEORY of Evolution for a reason, ignorant *******.
Prove it for me lil’ buddy. Not opinions, FACTS, prove the THEORY!
And don’t give me that prove Intelligent Design” diversion either. ANSWER THE QUESTION.
MO-ron!
sooner12
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 10:01pmHey Robodummy……It‘s called a Theory of Evolution because it hasn’t been proved.It’s still just a theory. Once it has it then becomes fact.
Report Post »Homeschoolmama
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 10:55pmThe creationists think that it is the evolutionists who are fools. Scientific law says that like begets like. A human can only produce a human and a monkey can only produce a monkey. DNA strengthens that law since cell reproduction has an automatic fact checker and removes any mistakes. Any mistakes in DNA synthesis that manage to make it into a living creature are not to the benefit of the species but to its detriment. DNA evidence also shows that every example of a missing link has been proven to be either full a monkey or fully a human, or pig or horse. Species are not able to produce offspring with members of other species. Even a horse and donkey though close enough related to produce offspring only produces sterile offspring. The laws of probability show that it is impossible for non-organic substances to evolve into organic substances and then to diversify into the multitude of species that exist today, which are fewer than existed several thousand years ago. Louis Pasteur and Francesco Redi proved in the 1860′s that spontaneous generation does not happen. To be continued….
Report Post »Homeschoolmama
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 12:13amAlso, the known rate at which the moon is moving away from the earth has been used to determine that the earth can be no more than 10,000 yrs. old. If you look at geology through the eyes of a creationist rather than a disbeliever it is obvious that the earth has been inundated with a massive flood at some point in the past. Which is also where all the fossils came from. Fossils are rarely created today and yet are found in massive amounts all over the globe. A look at an ecosystem will show that everything needs to be there in order for it to work. The dead plant matter needs to be there to feed the plants, the plants need to be there to feed the herbivores, and the prey animals need to be there to feed the predators. Even the anatomical make up of water could not be a coincidence. It must be able to evaporate at common temperatures on earth, condense at temps. found at high atmospheres, rain down, freeze into snow and ice and melt throughout the year irrigating those ecosystems. We are also just the right distance from the sun to make it all happen just right. That just too many coincidences for me for there to be no God.
Report Post »LoveTheTruth
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 1:06amSome food for thought..
Check out a very well educated gentlemen (A. E. Wilder-Smith – now passed away) who had three earned PhDs. He believed in Creationsim. http://www.wildersmith.org/
Here’s the nub of the matter to those who deny creationsim (or I suppose evolution if it were true for that matter). If you were presented with enough facts and information to reach the point of ontological certitude, would you change your mind? If not, then your issue is with morals and character, not an intellectual issue. Willfulness masquerading as inteiigence in that case I suppose.
How do you accept a different point of view? With ridicule? Closemindedness is never appealing.
The problem most folks have with creationism is that their ‘god’ is too small – usually limited by their minds. I can assure you He is not too small. :)
And for anyone who thinks that running someone else down is ‘smart’, think again. That goes both for those who are believers and those who are not. Shame on all of us.
Doug
Report Post »Hermano
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 8:41amHoly cow, even Darwin had problems with evolution. The main problem for evolutionists is that their theory requires support from historical science, not observational science. And as far as “micro-evolution” is concerned (i.e. a finch changing to a different species of finch) there is a loss of genetic information, so it is actually de-evolution. There is no added genetic information which would be required for evolution. As a result “macro-evolution” is even more of a pipe dream.
Report Post »AmericablessGod
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:29pmSo, Mr. Mathews, a President who believes in God is “anti-intellectual”? Why do you think a believer has to be intellectually inferior to atheist fascists like BO? Oh yes, I forgot – I’m one of those “idiots”. What could I possibly know about science?
Report Post »conservideo
Posted on August 22, 2011 at 11:29amMatthews has had his head buried up Obummer’s A$$ for so long that he hasn‘t seen the light of day since Hussein’s election campaign. In fact, if Obummer were to expose his bum to the world, upon close examination, all you would see is Chris Matthews’ feet hanging out. Baahahahaha!!! Anyone that watches him or Bill Maher and has any appreciation for any of the putrid vile that spews out of their mouths are as anti-American as they come, in light of the constitution, and as socialist as Mao and Marx. I ain‘t hatin’… I‘m just callin’ it like I see it. Wake up America!!
Report Post »fckrisk
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:27pmPound sand Chris Matthews
Report Post »101
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:26pmMathews we just simple minded people we know not about science and evolution you speak such big words that us poor poor peons can’t understand
Report Post »CutThePuppetStrings
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:25pmChris Mathews…The Tingler is Anti-Intellectual…he proves it everyday!!!
Report Post »Cold War Vet
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:38pmYes he does!
Report Post »Mike Z4000
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 7:55amWho ever asserted that Chris Matthews is an intellectual? If he is an intellectual then those of us with just average intelligence are bloody geniuses.
Report Post »David Hudson
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:18pmI tracked down Matthews’ comment about the “religious right” leading the Tea Party and all I could find was an excerpt from an upcoming book . It cited a poll, yet did not specify who was interviewed or give any of the raw data for the poll. I presume that it only included those either on the government teat or those that live in metro areas, not Middle America where the majority of us live. Matthews is a agenda-driven dolt.
Report Post »Patrick in AZ
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:20pmWhat is scary is an anti-American marxist in the White House.
Report Post »IntransigentMind
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:23pmHere’s what Matthews really finds terrifying:
Report Post »http://markamerica.com/2011/08/19/new-awesome-sarahpac-video/
CatB
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 11:33pmAmen PATRICK IN AZ!
TEA!
Report Post »Rayblue
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:18pmHow would “competing in a world of science and technology” have anything to do with evolution ?
Report Post »What great strides have been made by believing in evolution ? What new technology ?
By comparison, the word of the Bible has led to the foundation of America.
The word of God has led to the most compassionate people the world will ever know.
Evolution leads to bones and that’s about it.
blamb61
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:17pmhttp://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/sciencefaith.html
Famous scientists that believed in God.
What is scary is leaders who don‘t have any problems with killing millions because they don’t beleive they have to answer to a higher being (Mao, Lenin, Stalin, etc..)
Report Post »Steel Awesome
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:16pmWouldn’t it also be scary to have a Marxist as president? We do and it is.
Report Post »michael48
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:12pmthe messnbc headliners…mushmouth…(manlove affliction) especially anything beggining with“O”…and Poverty Program Pimp …Al Sharpton…just flat azz (“to stupid to breathe”)…but did tutor “oblamo” in Lie-ology at Red Brigade U. , a SOROS funded pre-school…the rest of the HE/SHE/IT’S are unknown, but posibly on Obangos Species (fecies?) TREE…we’ll really never know…he!! we haven’t a clue where , who, or what Universe the “Carnie in Charge” came from…so pretty much speaks volumes about a bunch of nobodies , going no where , REAL QUICK…
Report Post »GeorgieJo
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:10pmTHANKS to the BLAZE staff for the NEAR daily reminder of how STUPID ChrissyMatthews IS
I WILL NOT forget.
The only stimulus USA got after Obama was Chris Matthews getting a tingle……….
Report Post »Banter
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:05pmYea, that whole God thing really messes with the proggie mindset.
Report Post »USMarine0311
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:05pmOdd Chris, all those countries you mentioned all have deep beliefs in their Gods and don’t focus on evolution. However who here believes that Chris Mathews would ever be fair. One reason I don’t watch his show.
Report Post »Rayblue
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:33pmGood point.
Report Post »mrfunn
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:04pmHave you ever heard a President whine so much about what he inherited?
I don’t recall Bush whining, on and on, about what he inherited from Clinton.
The tech bubble created during Clinton’s watch was beginning to crash when Bush to office.
The housing bubble created by Clinton and Cisneros ( The National Homeownership Strategy and revised CRA ). Forced lending to home buyers who could not afford a home. What could go wrong?
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac? Bush tried to change them, the Dems would not let him.
Osama bin Laden, Clinton had multiple opportunities to take him out. Would 911 have happened if Clinton had OKed the plans to take bin Laden out?
Hey Obama, your not the only President who has inherited some problems.
Grow up. Stop whining.
Report Post »GeorgieJo
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 10:12pmFUNN
Report Post »Thank You for the review
I am personally tired of the Whiner in Chief
Blame game gets you NO WHERE
Obummer didn’t have a daddy to teach him that.
proud2bmom
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 10:24pmDon’t forget about the “headwinds” of 9/11. He didn’t whine about that, either. He manned up and dealt with it.
Report Post »mrfunn
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 4:23pmThought I would add another one Bush inherited.
The stained rug in the Oval office and the moral decline that followed.
Report Post »Plumber1911
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 4:28pmI live in Michigan and Grandmole blamed Engler to the day she was term-limited out of office.A good look in the mirror is all that was needed.
Report Post »kickagrandma
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:01pmchrismatthews you are such a slimeball jerky quirky tool of satan. YUCK! you make me want to throw up, and I HATE to throw up. BARF!!!!
I would love to have a CHRIST follower, a CHRISTIAN, as president. The “intellectuals” have killed us. What buffoons you all are.
GOD has chosen us to receive HIM. What joy is that! HE IS EVERYTHING. intellect is nothing, zip, nada, zero. I’ll take a CHRISTIAN hands down every time.
We win it all.
you lose it all, big boy….NOT!
Report Post »Glenn is Right
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:18pmThe Left is full of useful idiots with bull horns, microphones and in this case, a video camera.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 10:16pmYou so have it on the money KickAGrandma, so much on the money. Christ is the way and the life for all of us who will accept him and follow him back to God.
Report Post »cntrlfrk
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 8:58pm‘
I love how the democrat party that believes that the government can control the climate, people of the same sex can procreate, and babies are nothing more than fecal matter can claim to be the “Party of Science”
.
Report Post »Glenn is Right
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 8:57pmIf you think the world is only 5 thousand years old. You are either willfully ignorant or an idiot.
The world is closer to 5 billion years old, there were dinosaurs, there was no flood that covered the world and religion is used to control your behavior, take your money and molest your children.
…but Chris Matthews is still a moron. At least we can agree on that.
Report Post »Homeschoolmama
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 12:01amYes there were dinosaurs and we don‘t need big ol’ bones to prove it. They were mentioned in the Bible in the book of Job. But the world is not 5 billion years old, only a little over 6 thousand. It’s kind of funny how written history from all over the world sprang up about 3,500 to 5,000 years ago. Which by the way coincides with the Bible. Geologist can’t explain why there are what looks like older layers of earth on top of younger layers and why they look like the layers have been moved by a massive amount of water or huge flood of some kind. Maybe if they read their Bible they could figure it out. Did you know fossils can only be formed by denying them the thing that decompose them such as bugs, bacteria, and air, and one of the best way to do this is by covering them with a enough dirt that there are no bugs or bacteria. This rarely happens today. In fact the only fossils that are made today are not fossils but usually just frozen mountain climbers who begin to decompose as soon as they thaw out. Or they are people or animals that are buried in a landslide or flash flood. Yet there are billion of fossils found all over the world in huge fossil graveyards covering areas as large as 5 or 6 western states. I would bet these were preserved but The Flood. But don’t worry, I only have anatomy, biology, geology, astronomy, chemistry, archeology, and math to back up the Bible, nothing really credible like unsubstantiated opinion.
Report Post »woodyl1011fl
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 9:55amYou and Chris Matthews share the same mental disorder.
Report Post »Cruzan
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 10:36amHomeschool: man created the concept of years, around the time of the beginning of Christianity. God didn‘t and still doesn’t deal with years, so the earth being 6000 years old is a fallacy to begin with because it is a man made concept that was convenient at the time.
Report Post »MODEL82A1
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 8:57pmIs it possible to BECOME an albino? Because Chris seems to be losing all pigmentation.
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 9:01pmObama “walked into hell.”
==================
NO… Obama is dragging the country into hell.
http://www.AllenWestforPresident.us
Report Post »It’s time for a REAL leader!
Dustyluv
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 8:55pmI see hardhead is still got a thrill up his leg…
Report Post »How can anyone be so dumb and still have a television show?
Low standards in broadcasting never cease to amaze me.
VERYCONCERNEDCHRISTIANPATRIOT
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 8:58pmI think it would be closer to the truth to just say we have the President from hell and leave it at that.
Report Post »Living In NYC
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 8:54pmChris the mini-mind that never gets the facts right..just use Google!
There is a black cloud is over MSNBC – lack of viewers / ratings!
Report Post »Cruzan
Posted on August 20, 2011 at 10:03amDoesn’t Chrissy SpitBall Matthews realize that “hell” has nothing to do with evolution, but is a creationism theory? He is bipolar without drugs. and his viewers are so screwed up already there is no help for them at all.
Report Post »frank_reuben_floyd
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 8:53pmNothing motivates people like righteous indignation. The more they call us racist, the more “otherwise unmotivated” voters are coming off the sidelines in droves.
Report Post »Micmac
Posted on August 19, 2011 at 8:52pmNoBama walked into Pergatory, but made his own Hell.
NoBama 2012
Report Post »