Citizens Shoot Down Animal Rights Group’s Surveillance Drone
- Posted on February 17, 2012 at 7:42pm by
Tiffany Gabbay
- Print »
- Email »
A remote-controlled aircraft owned and operated by an animal rights group called SHARK, was reportedly shot down near Broxton Bridge Plantation, South Carolina, on Sunday.
TheTandD.com reports:
Steve Hindi, president of SHARK (SHowing Animals Respect and Kindness), said his group was preparing to launch its Mikrokopter drone to video what he called a live pigeon shoot on Sunday when law enforcement officers and an attorney claiming to represent the privately-owned plantation near Ehrhardt tried to stop the aircraft from flying.
“It didn’t work; what SHARK was doing was perfectly legal,” Hindi said in a news release. “Once they knew nothing was going to stop us, the shooting stopped and the cars lined up to leave.”
Hindi said the animal rights group decided to send the drone up anyway but that seconds after it hit the air “numerous shots rang out.”
“As an act of revenge for us shutting down the pigeon slaughter, they had shot down our copter.”
He claimed the shooters were “in tree cover” and “fled the scene on small motorized vehicles.”
From the SHARK YouTube page comes a video of the actual shoot-down with the intro:
Thugs for the Broxton Bridge Plantation, a former slave holder, now animal killing club, shoot down a camera equipped drone owned by SHowing Animals Respect and Kindness, or SHARK.
“It is important to note how dangerous this was, as they were shooting toward and into a well-travelled highway,” Hindi stated. He added that someone from SHARK called the Colleton County Sheriff’s Department to report of the incident.
TandD adds:
According to the report, Hindi told the responding deputy the group’s remote-controlled aircraft “was hovering over U.S. 601 when he heard a shot come from the wood line. The shot sounded to him that it was of small caliber.”
The incident report went on to state that “once shot, the helicopter lost lift and crash landed on the roadway of U.S. 601.”
The deputy noted in the report that he was unable to speak to anyone at Broxton Bridge Plantation following the incident.
Hindi estimated damage to the drone at around $200 to $300. …Hindi said he will seek charges against those who shot down the drone.
“This was SHARK’s first encounter with the Broxton Bridge Plantation, but it will certainly not be the last,” Hindi said. “We are already making plans for a considerably upscaled action in 2013.”
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 674 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 527 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 394 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 369 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 327 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 262 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 272 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 132 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 147 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 262 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (883)
chips1
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:04pmCompetition is still alive in America. Lets really get them mad. Lets keep score.
Report Post »America – 1
Freaks – 0
misoldier78
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:09pmThis is a classic case of trespass and any lawyer worth his salt should be able to seek damages and/or an injunction from SHARK. If the trespass claim doesn’t hold up, a nuisance claim should get through. Like my law professor says, “its like throwing a bowl of spaghetti on a wall and seeing what sticks”
Report Post »Doctor Nordo
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:23pmHow was it trespassing? It was hovering over a US Highway.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:26pm“ showing animals respect and kindness ” whatya bet these people are all PRO ABORTION….. i got twenty bucks says yes !!!!! Hypocrisy of the left runs deep….
Report Post »hauschild
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:35pmMost inspiring story I’ve read all week.
Report Post »flyoverbob
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:43pmnasty stinking pigeons
Report Post »teamarcheson
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:46pmOOOOHHHH SOOOO SOOORRRRY.
I hope they post how they did it so we can get ready. I wonder if they were able to download the video data so they can sue the owner for an invasion of privacy and criminal endangerment.
RepubliCorp
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:47pmhere is a legal drone killer…..
Report Post »http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2011/05/chris-dumm/gun-review-cabelas-dual-10-22-gatling-gun/
flyoverbob
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:53pmWhen I was a teenager we would shoot pigeons from under a bridge over the Mississsippi.There were tow bridges about 1/4 mile apart,some of us would stand under each bridge.When we would shoot they would fly to the other bridge.Pigeons are so dumb they would do this till we ran out of shells.
Report Post »Of course you cant do it any longer,some dumb as actually thinks you could shoot through 12″ of concrete with a shotgun.
Does anyone need a shooter for some of these drones?I had sniper training in the Army.
If you have some stinking birds of somekind,I have a shotgun too I will shoot them for free,and we can burn their disease carrying hide.
thetreyman
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:58pmwhy were they not cited for hovering above the highway. that is a potential hazard if if crashes on the road. also, i dont see a problem with shooting this drone down but not over a road.
Report Post »Buck Shane
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:07pm@ flyoverbob
Report Post »Sniper – assume the drone hovers. How high would it have to be to be safe from you with a .308?
markchristopher
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:07pmAmen, Brother! I wish I could’ve been there. A 12 gauge with bird shot should do the trick! Besides, what they do on their private property that is legal, is no business of theirs. They didn’t mention that over population of pigeons spreads disease and filth, not to mention the destruction of structures such as the I-35 bridge collapse that happened a few years back.
Report Post »Delta D-5-3
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:31pmGreat shot guys!!! Give that guy a medal, LOL.
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:37pmI just can’t stop laughing with pure elation over this…. Lock and load
Report Post »SgtB
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:38pmTo all of you worried about this little buzzard being shot down, I have to ask if you’ve ever shot a shotgun… The little helicopter was most likely shot down with number 7 or 8 target loads and the range of such small shot is not very far at all. In fact, I’ve seen them put a target shoot at an outdoor show about 200 yards from the main road to the arena where it was being held. The worst that that pellet would do at distance is scratch your eye.
This is not the first drone that “SHARK” has used and had shot down while flying over others’ property. Personally, if I see ANYTHING hovering over my yard that isn’t being flown by a child, I’m shooting the 5h!t out of it. And then I’m gonna keep it as a trophy.
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:51pmPidgeons are just air rats unless you are a gourmand and then they are tasty squab – still laughing
Report Post »drago
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:58pm“to video what he called, a live pigeon shoot”, well you sure as hell dont shoot dead ones you moron.Sounds like someone shot the wrong thing……….
Report Post »flyoverbob
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:01pm@ BUCK SHANE,
Report Post »I don’t really know,the rifle I had in Vietnam was an XM21 which was a precision made M14.I could easily hit a silhouette at 600 meters.I have hit with it as far as 1000 meters.Thats not an estimate,that was on a range.We had a starlight scope for it too,It was really big and bulky,but it was really cool at night to use tracer rounds and strike metal.
By the way the round was 7.62,packed a punch.
dumbdumberdumbest
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:03pmThere was a time when a R/C Club used to get up on Sundays at the crack of dawn and fly noisy Radio Controlled Airplanes right over my house where I was trying to sleep in. Being a peaceful person who had asked the R/C/ Club to just fly the Airplanes in the other direction at least until I was awake I handled the problem just like a peaceful person would. I went to a Hobby Store and bought the most powerful R/C controller with a handful of the frequency chips that you could swap out in seconds. Each time a Radio Controlled Aircraft buzzed directly over my house I got the controller. With the swiftness of a sniper, I simply used the R/C controller by swapping out the chips until got the frequency of the buzzing airplane, took control and flew it out of site over the woods never to be found again. It only took three aircraft losses to be able to sleep in on Sundays. All peaceful. All legal. Anyone listening??
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:26pm@ Thetreyman
“why were they not cited for hovering above the highway. that is a potential hazard if if crashes on the road. also, i dont see a problem with shooting this drone down but not over a road.”
I thought the same thing. Shooters should be mindful of what could have happened. If it had fallen on a car and killed someone, then what is a very heartening and enjoyable story would have been a tragedy, instead. Clearly, a shooter who brought it down and caused death or destruction would be liable (criminally and civily). But what would happen next year if things played out just as they did this year (a drone copter brought down over the highway, but the shooters are not known) — but an injury happened? Then SHARK would be liable — either under negligence (they knew what could happen) or under stict liability — and the other party to the injury could not be identified.
Baddoggy
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:27pm4th ammendment 1
Report Post »enviromental midgets 0
Buck Shane
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:30pm@ dumbdumberdumbest
Good Post.
Report Post »USAMEDIC3008
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:32pmTime To enforce My no fly zone..
Report Post »Rowgue
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:42pm@DOCTOR
First off, no it wasn’t hovering over the highway. That‘s just the story they’re trying to spin to make the people they’re harassing out to be dangerous lunatics. Secondly it wasn’t even shot. The idiot trying to fly it just lost control of it and crashed it into the highway. They made up the story about it being shot at to try to avoid charges for endangering motorists themselves.
Lastly taking extraordinary efforts to be able to spy on someone on their property is indeed trespassing. It’s not trespassing if you can just see something while glancing around while legally walking past their property. It is trespassing to use specalized equipment or extraordinary means to see onto their property or into their house when it’s not otherwise possible.
Report Post »2theADDLED
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:45pmCould of swore someone called “PULL” or possibly the noise it was making sounded like a pigeon.
Report Post »Buck Shane
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:48pm@ Rowgue
Peeping Tom.
Report Post »Buck Shane
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 11:07pm@ flyoverbob
Report Post »I’m a hunter not a sniper. My longest shot on the range was 700 yards. I was younger then; and no one was in danger of shooting at me. But you guys can do things I could never dream of.
There are three way to deal with the drones: 1. Shoot it, 2. Camouflage everything, and 3. Jam the frequency.
Number one is the most fun and the most frustrating for the peepers, so that’s my favorite.
Buck Shane
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 11:18pm@ M1A2_Tanker
Almost everything in your post is “Straw Man,”
Report Post »You do not know any of the thing you charged.
This was not a complaint; it was a suggestion. This is a way for us to protect ourselves from these sneaky creeps.
The funny thing is, you would be on his side, if you understood what he was saying. But … you do not or can not.
M1A2_Tanker
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 11:49pmHe was offering up his past experience dealing with a fellow nuisance citizen on how to combat this sort of intrusion, I understand completely. I am absolutely against this or any other spying on U.S. citizens be it douche bag activists or over bearing governments. Never the less his example proved what a hypocrite he is in his own life. And if you know that the “Story” is just that, then please tell me where you received this amazing knowledge.
Report Post »Paul
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 12:07amOk everyone buy a BB gun before they are outlawed! That‘s all it’ll take to drive the ba$tards crazier than they already are !
Report Post »Buck Shane
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 12:09am@ M1A2_Tanker
How do you know he bought his house after the RC club started?
Report Post »Why shouldn’t the RC club try to be polite?
You say you understand completely – I don’t believe you.
blamelessace5
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 12:27amHow cool would it have been if you just happen to have a flak gun!
Report Post »Rosey
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 1:24amI guess that’s just one of the hazards these tree-huggers will have to get used to…that heli looks exspensive. I predict there venture is going to be a spendy one. Good thing ammo is cheap. Hope they have deep pockets.
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 1:30amIt appears to me they crashed it on purpose.
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 1:31amWait a minute. SOME Liberal freaks send a drone to spy on private property and they think they have rights? Uh. Get a court order you dopes. Where can we send ammo? We obviously need some new laws to COVER OUR RIGHTS OF PRIVACY and ACCESS with these new “drone-type” inventions.
WHY are you freaks more concerned about the babies you are killing right and left ?
Report Post »Flapjack
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 1:37amListen to the nutball, “those are .22′s” he says it after you hear the shots. Tell me if I’m wrong, any bucktooth dippin‘ redneck is smart enough to know that he ain’t going to be hitting a moving aerial target from 400 feet away with a 22.
Report Post »TexasKnight
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 3:00amDumbDumber, LMFAO. Funniest post on a funny story.
Report Post »I have flown RC aircraft, but never near homes. I respect others too much, and yes only at RC parks.
As a shiftworker, who sleeps during the day, I can soo relate.
Some RC planes cost thousands of dollars to build, so I personally wished you had landed them safely far away where they could go get it a few times….
PaxInVeritate
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 4:23amMaybe they could hire a RC expert to fly a cheap “fighter” airplane and have a good ol’ fashion dogfight. Say, can they be rigged to shoot CO2 cartridge BBs? I’d pay to see that happen!
Report Post »000degrees
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 6:32amI‘d like to hear that call going into the sheriff’s switchboard….”some big mean guy just shot my Christmas present!!! Make him say he’s sorry”.
Report Post »On the upside I’m thinking the sport shooters have just ushered in a new “sport”. Watch their membership rise….
don moore
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 6:34amDrone shooting sounds like great target practice. I for one can’t wait for the feds to send up their drones, I bet they’d look cool exploding in mid air.
Report Post »drparker37
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 7:16amMay have been a case of trespass, but if they did shoot in the direction of a public road, that could be seen as dangerous and not bode well for their case against SHARK.
Report Post »Meyvn
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 7:21am@Flapjack… that comment made me laugh also. That was no .22
Report Post »Hugh Williams
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 7:26amI understand what M1A2_Tanker is saying. There is a race track at the Nashville Fairgrounds that has been there for 60 years. Every year people living in this area of town try to get the race track shut down because of noise. Most of the time when these people are interviewed on TV they are in their 20’s or 30’s. The race track has been in that location longer than these people have been alive. If you are dumb enough to buy a house near a race track don’t complain about the noise. As for the drone it would be more fun to shoot one down than to shoot clay targets (which I live to do).
Report Post »doxyonr
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 7:57amCrash and burn. LOL
Report Post »ha99yhack3r
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 8:04amIf I stand on the street and zoom into his yard with a camcorder to spy on him would he think nit was ok then?
Report Post »phoenix110
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 8:08amI am laughing my head off thinking how upset the freaks feel right now. I wouldn’t be surprised if they feel as though that the “shark” drone was an actual living breathing animal they love to protect so much and are having a wake for it at this very moment. *laugh* What is equally funny is that this whole incident was to “protect” rats with wings. Get a life, sharkies, seriously … on second thought, keep the laughs coming.
Report Post »D-Fence
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 8:39amI don’t understand, were the pigeons in their cages when they were shot?
Report Post »gotta light
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 8:45amOk I watched this video several times, WITH and WITHOUT sound. Without the off screen narration telling you what they want you to beleive is happening you have absolutely NO WAY OF ACTUALLY KNOWING WHAT IS HAPPENING. With narration you still only know what the narrator wants you to think. The pigeon shooter certainly have their bias but REMEMBER these SHARKS are also just as biased! Isn‘t sad that you can’t trust anything any longer….
Hey bud gotta light?
Report Post »Immiceelf
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 8:58amLet’s look at common sense…SHARK launches this drone high above a public highway, shooters take aim at the drone ( Old Suicide) and knock it out of the sky. I DON’T THINK SO! If I, or anyone I know that knows how to use a firearm were shooting at this thing, it wouldn’t have fallen straight back to earth with all blades still whizzing. It would have come down in many pieces scattered across the woods adjacent to the highway. I think Mr. SHARK just needs more lessons on how to fly this noisy peace busting POS and definately some lessons on how to operate a video camera. A good videographer keeps his subject in focus and in the center of the frame. Doesn’t “Suicide” mean to kill oneself? The drone was appropriately named. Good thing Mr. SHARK wasn’t the one with the gun.
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 8:59amIf i was having a pigeon shoot, no drone would stop me from shooting.
I pray someone flys one where we hunt, shooting it down would not only be fun, I would mount it on my wall when I was done.
If you want to make a differnece, go find a child molester, or go after Planned Parenthood for showing sexual filth to grad school kids. Pigeons are over populated, some shooters killing them for sport aint hurting nothing.
Report Post »Viper1
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 9:03amThis is how the government is starting to watch us all. If you know your neighbor is doing something you don’t like, (whether or not it is legal or not), just fly one of these drones over their heads and record them. The government, our government, is now planning to fly these aerial surveillance vehicles over farm land so they can tell farmers what to grow. I think that this is just a test letting these idiots see what would happen and if the general public would put up with it or not. I hope they got their answer.
Report Post »Formula382
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 9:19amPoor shot indeed, it would have taken me only one pull of the trigger on my trusty Sig Sauer AR15 and that drone would have come apart in flight, no controlled landing!
Nice work hunters, keep the animal rights freeks in their place!
Report Post »NukeHaze
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 9:40amWe seem to be missing stories on The Blaze about the 30,000 drones that will be up and buzzing over US soil. NDAA mandated it from what I hear and I would like The Blaze to investigate.
Also I heard Glenn mention that China was responsible for hacking the drone that “crashed” in Iran so it may have been landed there in actuality or intentional by the Chinese. Where is this story?
As far as this story goes, guys in the trees with buckshot taking down thier “drone” I don’t have a problem with. They knew where they were flying it from and that likely the shooters would not risk shooting “towards” a busy highway which the group cried. It would have been funnier though to crash another radio controlled plane into it in mid air.I guess being an enthusiast for R/C stuff labels me, too, though. Did they ask these birds if they wanted to be filmed? Their rights to die privately and expect reasonable privacy on private land were denied using their argument. These vegan nutjobs do not even remember that their own beloved Darwin postulated that man did not gain intelligence until he BEGAN eating meat.
Report Post »mils
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 9:43amjust so they eat the pigeons…
Report Post »Wolf
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 9:53am“…they were shooting toward and into a well-travelled highway,” Hindi stated…”
Report Post »Umm, wrong, Hindi: they were shooting toward an invasion of their privacy, and they didn’t miss.
If you moron juveniles want to play in the big league, you’d better get used to the rules you created. You want to invade someone’s private property and privacy, then expect them to invade your privacy- and be happy they only shot down your toy. Next time, it may be a handler.
Consider yourselves warned that your liberal BS will not be tolerated.
Uncle Sugar should consider this as well: Patriots will not tolerate your intrusion into their lives, either.
Funny thing about this is that Hindi said it ‘sounded like a small caliber bullet’. Just imagine: this was just a couple of redneck boys from the neighborhood practicing aerial shooting with their .22. Now imagine what they and their parents can do with real bullets. And you’re the target.
The Jewish Avenger
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 10:05amWhile he was taken “cry for the disrespected disease carrying NON pets” 101 someone slept though physics. There is nothing in this video that proves that the R/C Copter was shot. Wouldn’t you want to show the viewers the damage that was done to it. Oh wait there it is! Amazing! It perfectly snap the ends of both sides of a propeller!!! I wander what else can do this? Oh ya a swift dissent that results in an uneven landing! I’m am sure a few pro R/C’ers can attest to this.
Another wacko doing what they do best: harass and lie till they get what they want. He wants the pigeons so bad, I think everyone in Manhattan should scrape their roofs of pigeon dung, send an R/C fleet of copters to drop this stuff over his house. Wonder what the EPA would do with his residence afterwards? Pigeon are disease carriers, if these private property owners want to kill them for sport, have at it IMO. Plus its a wonder how self righteous they act: I wonder if this was near any ghetto or near the Mexican border how quick they’d be squawking like chickens and calling them out and sarcastically calling them wimps. It’s private land, he has no legal rights. I’d say sue his tofu smelling rump. Money, it makes them either powerful or fold at a moments notice.
Report Post »gofigureinternational
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 10:18amWouldn’t surprise me a bit to see this hit the court systems. First, technically the government is going to claim you cannot own airspace. Though the unusual measures they took to trespass that someone else mentioned is valid to date. It also gives precedent, or at least the argument for, the government to use their drones and spy on pretty much anything they want which likely they are doing in many areas already. It also warms up the public so they are not so shocked and outraged, as “Private groups are doing it already”. Stories like these are a slippery slope even for the nut jobs that owned it; he better be careful for what he wishes for in terms of his little drone getting blown out of the sky. He just may get it. Great shot fellas; too bad they didn’t have another 99 of those to run past. Would have been nice to shot a perfect 100:)
Report Post »Wolf
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 10:20am@ Flapjack… “…Listen to the nutball, “those are .22′s” he says it after you hear the shots. Tell me if I’m wrong, any bucktooth dippin‘ redneck is smart enough to know that he ain’t going to be hitting a moving aerial target from 400 feet away with a 22..”
Report Post »Don’t bet on it, Flapjack. 400 feet is 125 yards. Simple enoough to do with a .22 even for someone who isn’t a redneck. Especially something as large as that drone appears to be. All it takes is practice, which obviously these guys were doing.
To see more people who’re actually hitting small targets at 400 yards with .22s, just go to Sniper’s Hide and check out what some of them are doing at 500 yards.
Now you can go back to your pancakes- be sure to use real maple syrup on them.
last frontier
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 10:21amAfter there drone was shot down they went to mcdonalds for some no light small cage chicken sandwiches.
Report Post »Wolf
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 10:39am“…D-Fence
Report Post »Posted on February 18, 2012 at 8:39am
I don’t understand, were the pigeons in their cages when they were shot?…”
No, D-Fence, the pigeons are let loose, at which time they fly in eratic patterns/directions making them difficult targets.
richard the lion-hearted
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 10:42am@dumbdumberdumbest
Report Post »Love the creative effort! That’s a good remedy for what I expect to be more and more intrusion by left-wing whacko groups…including the government.
richard the lion-hearted
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 10:53am@M1A2_Tanker
Report Post »Awwww what’s the matter? Someone shoot down your ‘wittle’ kite with a bb gun when you were just a lad? And now you fly into blind rage at the mere mention of anything similiar? Get a grip, you‘re emotionally unsound and in need of therapy if you can be set off to such rage by a story from one’s past. If the model plane enthusiast can’t be respectful of his neighbors, which by the way is the FIRST point, then leave them to their own devices. There’s an old story about poking at a bear with a stick through a cage, and then one day the bear gets ahold of you…you would think it‘s the bear’s fault by your backwards way of thinking.
IntheKnowOG
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 11:01amIronically, the lawyer said they couldn’t shoot pigeons over a “BUSY” highway (Which, not one vehicle drove on during the filming of this clip. Another lie by a leftist to infringe on private property rights). Let me ask you this, does that drone present the same hazard as “shooting” over the “busy” highway? Also, I would like to see the flightplan registration for that drone flight (I suspect it does not exist). Is that drone licensed with the FAA? (I doubt it). It’s time for us to get dirty and use their tactics.
Report Post »Zod Cranards
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 11:02amYes, actually the shooter/s should be commended for excellent marksmanship–after all the target was moving eratically, like a large fly and they still got it. Not much danger of property damage since it was just buckshot.
Report Post »rox
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 11:07amI would have done the same thing.
Report Post »dogmeat
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 11:28amLol!
Report Post »ChiefGeorge
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 11:37amUmmm? Steel buckshot going through Lipoly Batteries such as those on the drone will cause the Batteries to go on thermal runaway almost instanteously and catch fire in a very spectacular way. The batts on this copter are huge, if the bullet or buckshot did go through the batteries, those who launched this thing over the overs will be paying for the fire control of that forest. Looked pretty darn dry in there. Oh yea! Once the batts catch fire, they cannot be put out. Exploding cigarette? Yep! Lipoly strikes once again.
Report Post »Longinthetooth
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 11:46amOne shot, One kill!
Report Post »Semper Fi!
And I’m sure it was AMAZINGLY Gratifying!!!! LOL!
Bum thrower
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 11:55amDumb *****!! That’s why the are supposed to fly HIGH….ground fire is very effective…ask any chopper pilot from the Viet Nam war…………..’if it flys…..it dies’…
Report Post »hightide
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 12:17pmLooks like a country road. The hunters probably own the land on both sides of the road and are the only ones that go down there except the spy’s and their drones. They have no right to peep at the activities on someone’s private property. Good shot boys…
Report Post »toto
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 12:24pmTanker, you make a lot of assumption re diverted aircraft away from a peaceful abode. The man tried to gain some consideration and respect by asking them not to fly over until a little later in the morn. Not unreasonable. His remedy was clever and fair. If everyone just followed the Golden Rule and was not so rigid, life would be better for all, and that’s the point.
Report Post »banjarmon
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 12:33pmThat thing look like a pigeon to me…..BANG!!!!
Report Post »M1A2_Tanker
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 12:37pm@richard the lion-hearted
I have ZERO issue with this drone being shot down(If in fact that is what happened). I would have done it as well. If you had actually read my post you would have also read the part where I said I do not fly R/C. Never have probably never will. How can you people not see the hypocrisy of the violation of privacy and trespass Yet totally miss that Dumb… purposely destroyed someones personal property because he was annoyed. You can not fly R/C’s at “the crack of down” Because you cant see them to fly them. The folks who are legally flying their R/C’s at an approved air strip are the folks following the laws regarding R/C’s which means there is a maximum distance they can fly them from ANY STRUCTURES. Noise pollution is taken account of when they adopted these reg’s. As well as local, county and state noise reg’s. If you decide to sleep during abnormal times for what ever reason, that is your problem to deal with the Normal business of that time period. If you don’t like it get a new job. It is your responsibility in life to ensure that you get the sleep you need not your neighbor. There is so much common sense being lost here. You must hold yourselves to the same standards you judge others of. If you don’t then YOU MUST DEAL WITH THE CONSEQUENCES. Are you gonna shoot at the 747 leaving the airport at 3 in the morning? What about the C-47 leaving the Airbase across town flying low running night ops?
Report Post »Un-informed
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 12:42pmSHARK is another business ( $700k/ yr) masquerading as a non-profit….look it up on the Web ( search for Guidestar).
Their secretary makes $55k/yr for 16hrs per week work (it’s listed in the IRS 990 form for 2010). So that’s $100k plus for a fulltime working person like us.
Non-profits are a great way to hide your associations and intent
Dig into these non-profits…you would be amazed
Report Post »M1A2_Tanker
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 12:43pm@richard the lion-hearted
Call the veteran unstable, How rich and original. Because you lack the integrity to hold your self to the standards you set for those who don’t share your views. If you want privacy then you also MUST grant privacy to those you don’t like. You can not have both ways under the U.S. Constitution.
Report Post »bechokoy
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 12:47pmSo shark went to a pigeon shoot? Most pigeons are considered varmints. also they knew that people were going to be shooting at these pigeons so they put a helicopter in the sky were they were shooting sound irresponsible to me. Also many states have laws about interrupting a hunt or scaring wild game away from hunters. Sounds to me like shark was acting in a malicious manner
Report Post »teamarcheson
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 12:54pmThat drone operator should be arrested for endangerment. That drone is dangerous to the motoring public. He does not have any authorization to fly his drone over private property or to spy on people even if they are legally shooting animals.
Report Post »NukeHaze
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 1:00pmGood Fences make good neighbors.
These toy shark morons are just trying to get in the news. They more than likely had an equipment malfunction or even more likely it was operator error as we say in the military. I would have used bird shot and made swiss cheese out of it. They think they are playing battlebots and are clever with a private drone to catch the pigeon killers as if there is a place reserved for them in hell or in jail. I don’t think most D.A.s would really care to prosecute other than a fine for the money generation. Also being an R/C enthusiast, I would have loved to hover one of those cheap drones outside of their hooka party where they came up with this idea. film that and release the footage just after they released theirs of shooting the pigeons. Then again, if martial law gets instated under this administration from the NDAA using all of its drones within the next 12 months, 30, 000 of them over U.S. soil monitoring citizens and OnStar doing the same, carrier pigeons may be the only way we Tea Party, 912ers, FreedomWorks, etc. can communicate once they hit the internet kill switch enabled under the SOPA and PIPPA(? not sure of the acronym) acts. May need to save the pigeons and go back to really old school encryption on paper. Man I really do not want this country, the only society where freedom ever existed, to be lost especially for our childrens’ sake and lose it on OUR watch. This may be another of their arguments against 2nd amendment rights also
Report Post »M1A2_Tanker
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 1:04pm:The man tried to gain some consideration and respect by asking them not to fly over until a little later in the morn. Not unreasonable. His remedy was clever and fair.”
Asking nicely doesn’t mean squat! Why do the R/C pilot’s not have any rights? It is not reasonable to be forced to sit around thinking…I wonder if he is awake yet?….Should I call him and find out? or will that wake him up? Clever? Maybe. Fair? Absolutely not. Destroying the property of others is not peaceful nor is it right. You just don‘t decide to break laws because you don’t agree with them. I do not for a second believe that the OP Tried to resolve this in a peaceful manner. You only have to google the topic to see the things these folks do when they think their rights are above others. These strips do not get built without all of these concerns being addressed. This isn’t the wild west. Amazing how this site is filled with folks talking about lifting Federal Regulations and yet here is an example of where the regs allow both pilots and neighbors to pursue their happiness yet the annoyed are commended for their destructive behavior. This is the exact same situation as the prayer banner being removed from school. Only the “Atheist Girl” instead tears down the banner and sets it on fire! None of you would be cheering then!
Report Post »M1A2_Tanker
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 1:09pm“I would have used bird shot and made swiss cheese out of it. They think they are playing battlebots and are clever with a private drone to catch the pigeon killers as if there is a place reserved for them in hell or in jail. I don’t think most D.A.s would really care to prosecute other than a fine for the money generation. Also being an R/C enthusiast, I would have loved to hover one of those cheap drones outside of their hooka party where they came up with this idea. film that and release the footage just after they released theirs of shooting the pigeons.”
REALLY? It is OK for you…..Just not for them? I can‘t stand these animal rights lunatic’s or their liberal commie Bull****. But you cannot say that we can ever win this fight if we do not play by the same rules! Integrity Must be at the top of the list otherwise we are no better than they are!
Report Post »ICOSAHEDRON
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 1:13pmIf I find one of these flying over my house, there won’t be enough pieces left to fill a matchbox…
Report Post »NukeHaze
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 1:20pmM1A2Tanker
“I would have used bird shot and made swiss cheese out of it. They think they are playing battlebots and are clever with a private drone to catch the pigeon killers as if there is a place reserved for them in hell or in jail. I don’t think most D.A.s would really care to prosecute other than a fine for the money generation. Also being an R/C enthusiast, I would have loved to hover one of those cheap drones outside of their hooka party where they came up with this idea. film that and release the footage just after they released theirs of shooting the pigeons.”
REALLY? It is OK for you…..Just not for them? I can‘t stand these animal rights lunatic’s or their liberal commie Bull****. But you cannot say that we can ever win this fight if we do not play by the same rules! Integrity Must be at the top of the list otherwise we are no better than they are!
Saying and Doing are 2 different things. I never said it was good or right what they did. They were obviously trying to invade the privacy of others without reasonable search or a warrant or authority. If this was completely open to the public in full view, there can’t much expectation of privacy. With drones of our failing government flying overhead now, anything that is outside, on private property now, is in full view of the overhead big brotherbots. I am not playing both sides so stop acting like a troll. we both have rights to privacy but also to be free to pursue happiness and bear arms and pr
Report Post »NukeHaze
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 1:37pmAlso if you cannot determine the intent of something like this that is so out of place hovering above your property, perhaps surveilling you, would you not say you have a right to defend your own privacy from another civilian acting like a PEEPING TOM?!? Tanker, you sound like a liberal. Oh yeah, I sure would allow some morons operating a camera bot hovering above my fence looking into my back yard and my own private life and voyeurizing my family sunbathing by the pool as well. How many dads out there would take one of those things down if they knew it was being operated by a pedophile? Some of us still believe in decency and privacy and that you should have safe havens where you could expect to walk around your own yard dressed how you want to be if you have good privacy fences or live in the woods in the sticks without ever having to see you recorded in your speedos being played on youtube. Decency and morality are not bad words despite what you would have us believe tanker. They had no right to play peeping toms and maybe the kids shooting at it should have used paintball guns or bb guns instead but if they didn’t want their junk broke, they should not have put it up there but did so likely because they knew that their communist in chief would stand behind them. I think Eric Holder already has his hands full, however. NDAA did NOT grant civilians the right to fly spy drones with or without warrants surveilling private property. NDAA AND OBAMACARE both need to be erased.
Report Post »M1A2_Tanker
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 1:54pmNukeHaze
WOW really? You took everything i said and reversed it and accused me of doing what you did. They have no right to spy and I would have shot it down. But your idea that you have the right because they did it without the right is morally bankrupt.
“Some of us still believe in decency and privacy”
Exactly what I said, Don’t try and turn it around because your upset I pointed out your hypocrisy.
“Decency and morality are not bad words despite what you would have us believe tanker.”
Report Post »I said exactly the opposite. Yet you say I sound like a Liberal? You are completely off your rocker. Integrity IS a morality. Plain and simple you can twist what I said 180 degree’s if you want, but it is in plain sight for anyone to see. Carry on!
NukeHaze
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 2:02pmTanker
I am no hypocrite. That would be you. I said it would be up their alley to give them a taste of their own medicine but I did not nor would I have spied on them as they did. You ignoring plain English and claiming hypocrisy shows your liberal indoctrination has taken hold very well. That is a left wing liberal tactic. Accuse the other side of doing exactly what you are really doing first and then nobody sees that you are the hypoicrite and you falsely allege the same against the other. I am not the one who got their feelers hurt and am not responding emotionally. That is what you are doing. I think most conservatives are fed up with this psychological sleight of hand you liberals play. Stop attempting to masquerade as a conservative because your true colors are showing… green.
Report Post »M1A2_Tanker
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 2:41pmWOW. Blatant crystal clear lies. You show up here 5 days ago and start accusing others of the things your guilty of, then claim that others are doing it to you. Go back to HuffPo where you belong Troll.
Report Post »M1A2_Tanker
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 2:43pmNEVERMIND, about the 5 days. apparently they don’t allow you to see a persons post older than a few weeks. But please do go back to HuffPo.
Report Post »Country Publius
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 3:10pmI‘m thinkin’ the good folks at Broxton Bridge should have plenty of time to research, and then acquire some RF frequency jamming technology. It might become prohibitively expensive for the idiot liberal/progressive “shark” organization to have to replace their little drone and it’s camera equipment each time it’s worthless, sniveling, whiney, shrill little Che-loving liberal controller mysteriously lost control and their contraption landed on private property owned by someone these worthless human debris dip-sticks have done their level best to pi$$ off.
Report Post »I’m also thinkin’ that if the out-of-control aircraft and camera just happened to land on a private roadway, and that privately owned four-wheel-drive pickup accidentally ran over it, it probably would lose a good bit of it’s airworthiness
…In fact …i may just do the jammer research for the real Americans of Broxton Bridge, out of the kindness in my heart.
Viet Vet
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 3:26pmAbsolutely love it!!!!!!!!
Report Post »NukeHaze
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 3:27pmThey have no right to spy and I would have shot it down. But your idea that you have the right because they did it without the right is morally bankrupt.
“Some of us still believe in decency and privacy”
Exactly what I said, Don’t try and turn it around because your upset I pointed out your hypocrisy.
“Decency and morality are not bad words despite what you would have us believe tanker.”
I said exactly the opposite.
Yes, you were saying exactly the opposite of the idea that decency and morality being good words. Whatever man. Morally bankrupt for saying it would be good to give them a taste of their own medicine? Ludicrous.
WOW. Blatant crystal clear lies. You show up here 5 days ago and start accusing others of the things your guilty of, then claim that others are doing it to you. Go back to HuffPo where you belong Troll.
NEVERMIND, about the 5 days. apparently they don’t allow you to see a persons post older than a few weeks. But please do go back to HuffPo
So, you spend time on HuffPo? I have never even seen the site. Yes, you can look up history of anyone’s remarks back pretty far, not just 5 days.
Try http://www.theblaze.com/users/.
I’ve been here since the beginning of the site. I couldn’t expect you to believe that though considering the trash in your ears and coming out of your mouth ditzing other people who have all noticed how emotional you got after getting called out on your liberalism. You must have missed the 10 or
Report Post »NukeHaze
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 3:39pmBTW Tanker I never called you mentally unstable…. and I am assuming you are a fellow Army vet. You just have a real Alex Jones/Ron Paul/Jesse Ventura stench of brainwashing about you. Does this make you a 9/11 truther like them as well? Or do you believe Popular Mechanics and their debunking of the conspiracy theories regarding this issue? I am a physics man, myself so I tend to believe the reality of the scientific arguments. I probably just lost you there. Sorry, I will type slower so you can keep up. Your argument is eleven up and three down. You seem to be willing to justify their actions of peeking tomfoolery by saying that it is wrong to take down an unauthorized surveillance craft, this case being a radio controlled helicam, that cost a little bit of money from an organization that claims to be a nonprofit charity which really is not. You still will not acknowledge that if they were spying over your privacy fence with a pedophile at the controls that there would be a problem with it. You also say you would have shot it down as well. Well, which is it? Is it right or wrong? Your arguing over which side you would take seems mostly just to show schizophrenia because you could be more “crystal clearly” unclear. Ignorant ranting babble mixed with false accusations and trying to twist words of other long time Blaze bloggers into those of being paid trolls seems to be your goal. If it is not, then you are succeeding at the wrong goal. The attempted spying was wrong. perio
Report Post »Lotus503
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 4:48pmThat drone was on the far end of the range of a trap gun…next time, bring a rifle…
Report Post »BigSky
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 6:10pmIt’s technically not trespassing since the drone hovered above the highway. Also, shooting across a public road is illegal in every state.
Report Post »Pelling1020
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 6:59pmEstimated damage, $200 to $300. Does that include the camera? If so that seems to me the entire flying RC was a piece of junk.
Report Post »GPS-Tech
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 7:18pmIf you dont like SHARK’s tactics call them and let them know. 630-557-0176
Report Post »Macman1138
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 8:31pmWhat were they thinking or trying to prove for that matter?
Report Post »Most sensible people would agree that anyone that would abuse animals would do the same to a child or the elderly.
This stunt with the drone is just plain stupid.
GETLIFE
Posted on February 19, 2012 at 5:43amMuch better to shoot down drones than living creatures.
Report Post »Just think SHARK people, you saved a few pigeons.
old white guy
Posted on February 19, 2012 at 7:26amif privacy =abortion in the scotus then watching people with an airborn camera is an invasion of privacy. shot em down boys.
Report Post »TomFerrari
Posted on February 19, 2012 at 7:45amIf they were within 500ft of persons or structures on the property, they are in violation of Federal Aviation Regulations. Specifically, I refer to “MSA’s” (Minimum Safe Altitudes), such as:
—
FAR 91.11 “Except when necessary for takeoff or landing, no person may operate an aircraft below the following altitudes:
(b) Over congested areas. Over any congested area of a city, town, or settlement, or over any open air assembly of persons, an altitude of 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal radius of 2,000 feet of the aircraft.
(c) Over other than congested areas. An altitude of 500 feet above the surface, except over open water or sparsely populated areas. In those cases, the aircraft may not be operated closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure.
—
The proliferation of unmanned aircraft are going to require some new FAR’s.
Do YOU want a bunch of drones buzzing over your house? Right now, “MSA” (Minimum Safe Altitudes) are the only regulations I can think of that apply.
Historically, a man who owned the land, owned all the earth below and all the sky above, to the heavens. This changed with the advent of flight. In the U.S., all airspace is in the purview of the federal government.
Report Post »TomFerrari
Posted on February 19, 2012 at 7:47amOh, and I’d bring it down by launching a rope or other snare with a single weight to give it inertia.
Report Post »Get that puppy tangled in those blades, and she‘s comin’ down!
Then you own a nice UAV or drone! LOL
dandelion8002
Posted on February 19, 2012 at 8:48amThat’s a great idea for any unauthorized drones. Great practice for duck hunting season. If there aren’t any laws on the books which would prohibit unauthorized drones over private property, there needs to be.
Report Post »RRFlyer
Posted on February 19, 2012 at 9:10pmDUMBDUMBERDUMBEST, I’m listening, and as an RCer I really don’t believe anything you just said. I think you should list it under “things I wish I could have done”
First, the transmitters, or “controller” as you call it does not come in different strengths. You can not buy one more powerful than another. Second except for the latest radios they come in different channels, and you change the channels with crystals or modules, which don’t come cheap. For you to “Take Control” you would have had to buy dozens of crystals. Also when two transmitters are turned on the same channel as a flying airplane, the airplane simply loses control, and Neither Transmitter is able to “Take control” and fly it away. Notwithstanding that you didn’t “take control” of anything, for you to have been able to even interfere with that many airplanes you would have had to spend hundreds of dollars.
Also the latest radios use 2.4 Gig which does not have set channels or frequencies. They are paired with the airplane receiver and change frequencies hundreds of times per second. You could turn on a dozen of the “strongest” transmitters made and it would have no effect at all on someone elses airplane.
Finally, If they were a legitimate RC club they would have had a sanctioned field with rules on times they could fly, and places they could or couldn’t fly.
Report Post »If complaints were made they would take it up in their meetings and resolve the situation. An RC club c
smithclar3nc3
Posted on February 20, 2012 at 2:53pmI bet this dumba55 SHARK group would have a problem if the government had unman drones watching everymove they make. Well,they are paving the way for full time government drones watching 24/7 the people on their private property.
Report Post »Crush_Liberalism
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 3:34pmI wouldn’t claim trespassing. What I want to see is this group’s claim to successfully identify the shooter/s. They admit that they “believe” the shots came from the trees, by unidentified people on unidentified vehicles. GOOD luck! And as for their remote control toy getting shot…well, they knew people would be shooting into the air. Stuff happens.
Report Post »baker john
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 5:27amTheir you go again Animal RIGHTS are being trampled on how sad, how bad darn pigeons are a dime a dozen or actually a penny around here we could send them some to replace the ones that might get shot we have an overabundance. Oh while we are at it wonder how many of those animal rights activists give a darn about how many children get aborted and most likely could care less about that but lets protect the pigeons never mind kids.
Report Post »jnfomo
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:23amBoth sides are wrong. The surveillance drone is clearly trespassing and invading privacy. The pigeon shooters are making a morally wrong choice. C’mon! Shooting pigeons for fun? That is cruel. I believe in personal freedom, but with that comes moral responsibility.
Report Post »jnobfan
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 2:54pmThis is an important issue for private property owners. I need to know if I have “airspace” over my property and if so how much.
Report Post »Can government or private aircraft take photos,video and audio of my private property or my actions on private propety? Can I disable them with guns,rocks,arrows or with my own aircraft? Can they fly into our barns,garages or bedroom windows?
I’m serious – this needs to be clarified and I don’t think we are going to like the answer.
Wiseone1w
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 4:50pmI don’t know if this was a trespass case or not, but it sure smells like an invasion of privacy. If you know anything about SHARK, you know that they have a history of being attention seeking screwballs. They claim to be animal rights people because their is big money in the donations. This “drone” was not a freebie, they spent good money to harass these hunters. By the way, hunting is a perfectly legal activity in this country. These folks were doing nothing wrong. Personally, I would have gone ahead and shot a few pigeons and then requested a copy of the video for posterity.
SHARK was only after a publicity stunt that could spur donations from eco-terrorist types.
Report Post »Babylonandon
Posted on February 25, 2012 at 7:43pmDon Moore, one little point on that whole “ shooting Fed drones” thingy:
About the first time someone pops one of their little R/C vehicles, the next one they send the one where that person will find him or herself looking down the business end of a Hellfire missile. A lot of Al Qaeda guys around the world have discovered how unpleasant that feeling is.
Report Post »Dazzaman
Posted on March 1, 2012 at 4:17amLol
Report Post »AZRACISTBIGOT
Posted on March 1, 2012 at 4:13pmI cant believe that the pigeon hunters were intimidated by these PETA / SHARK freaks or their toy helicopter.
Report Post »After blowing a pigeon away, I would dance and wave to the camera with my middle finger
Good shooting guys
By the way, doesnt PETA stand for “People Eating Tasty Anamals?
db321
Posted on March 16, 2012 at 11:55amStories like this will make Gin Sale go up – Stop invading America’s privacy you liberal freaks!
The Liberals are finding it hard to over through America – America is armed and ready.
Report Post »Patriot of My America
Posted on March 19, 2012 at 7:08pmGo Daddy, Go Daddy… Boom , Boom , Ka Boom… Use larger caliber and totally trash the toy. And have fun blasting the Squib.. In France Pigeons are on the Menu… Ur da,,, Ur doo robo flyers…. Damn I wish I was there with my Remington 12 gage Auto… 04 mag duck loads, it would not be a repair job, just a insurance claim… LOL till I cry….
Report Post »jeffersonian1776
Posted on March 23, 2012 at 10:53pmI’m not taking sides here; however, if I fly my drone over your property and you shoot it down, guess what? You just destroyed my property and I can seek damages. YOU DO NOT OWN THE AIR ABOVE YOUR PROPERTY! If you did, you could obviously charge airline companies a fee for flying over your property. I’m not saying anything about spying here though; that is a different situation altogether. It‘s just like you don’t own the ground under your property either. If you do then where exactly does it end? Does it form a conical shape to the center of the earth–that would be obsurd. I can dig or drill underneath your property all I want, I just can’t cause damage to your property above or anything to collapse.
Report Post »What have I learned from this? That we all need to become better educated on property rights as well as our own Constitution. Why do I say this? Because the Libs are banking on the fact that most Conservatives talk a mean talk when it comes to the Constitution, but they know in reality, Conservatives don’t really know their own Constitution at all.
Think about it. I say that I will pledge allegience to no flag, especially any “national” flag. This I know makes many Conservatives disgusted. If they only knew the truth and how it was Union soldiers on Sherman’[s terrorist March to the Sea who made innocent citizens in the South recite it (after they raped and plundered and pillaged them). It’s unconstitutional too, Jefferson and Washington would have never passed i
hallkbrdz
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 12:55pmHmmm.. looks like there may be a market for guided anti-drone micro-missles. Thanks for the idea SHARK.
Report Post »Redwood Elf
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 1:02pmSo they were gonna shoot some flying rats (That’s what pigeons are…rats with wings) – Serves these dummies right…typical liberal loonies, wasting their money on a boondoggle like a spy drone.
Report Post »adrefs
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 3:46pmWhat a great story! Thanks, I needed a laugh today! ;)
Report Post »AmericanStrega
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:03pm“Click, click..BOOM”
Report Post »MYHEROISRON
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:10pmI own the airspace above my property out to infinity … that is real estate law.
Report Post »MYHEROISRON
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:03pmOh yeah, and what falls onto my property belongs to me. And if you come onto my property thinking yer gonna retrieve it, I’ll have you arrested, or shot. Yer choice, you LIB punks!
Report Post »MYHEROISRON
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:16pmAnd my LAND SHARKS (German Shepards) will be waiting for you …
Report Post »MEANS2RESIST
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 1:13amIt would also be fun to fire some high velocity sky rockets at it that would be able to take it out @ a couple hundred feet. lmao
And why are these idiots worried about filthy pidgeons anyways?
Report Post »Captain Crunch
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 6:39amLooks like it made for some fun target practice. Hey guys, next time smear some mud on your plate.
Report Post »Wakeup Maggie
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 9:36amThat’s right my heroisron…it’s only a matter of time til they have that law changed…by executive order, no doubt.
Report Post »JACKTHETOAD
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 9:48amI never worried about pidgeons. I liked Walter in “Voyage To The Bottom Of The Sea”. :>)
Report Post »madasblazes
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 12:43pmWhere is the “kill shot” on a drone?
Need to know.
Report Post »Country Publius
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 3:19pm@Madasblazes,
The kill zone on this particular target would probably be through the lens of its $300.00+ video camera. Even if the craft managed to limp back to its noisy, whiney liberal/progressive fecal-brained owners, its value to their organized interference in people’s right to pursue happiness will have been effectively compromised.
:)
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 4:01pmAnyone remember about reading… about creating an EMPgun out of a MicroWave & Satellite Antenna… to out AeorCircuits?
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:03pmNext, they’ll just WEAPONIZE the drones. That way they can “Protect” their “public” property. Imagine, Armed Drones Policing the Populus! This WILL happen because the General American Populations are apathic.
30,000 Drones by 2020? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJMlIZVVoFY
Report Post »decendentof56
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 6:25amLook at his face as he tells his “joke” at the end of this video.
Report Post »Cold, emotionless, and evil. He is dead serious.
The dummies in the crowd are laughing, but the joke is on them. He is standing there, smug as hell, laughing to himself and thinking…..“these are some of the dumbest people on Earth”…they think I’m joking. “They thought it when I said I would ”fundamentally transform America”, and they still don’t get it. These are some of the most short-sighted people on the planet.”
Based on everything I’ve seen from this anti-American, everything I’ve heard from his own mouth or read about him, all of it absolutely verifiable, he has a deep-seated hatred for this country and its White oppressors.
Vote for this man at your own pearl.
dogma
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:03pmNext time use a bigger gun . Have a 10gauge handy
Report Post »cobra two
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:03pmNice shot! Save a Bird. SHOOT a DRONE!
Report Post »Jenny Lind
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:07pmWell said!
Report Post »Thighmaster
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:30pmLook at that thing! I would have felt threatened, shot it down, then claimed self defense.
Report Post »casseopea42
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:05pmWho controls what they do with it? People are so worried about the military flying their cameras over our houses….well these guys do it all the time I bet.
Report Post »sprfldman
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:03pmthis is beautiful!
and just the beginning…
tax payers – shoot down any and every drone you see!!!!
sorry Obummer…
Report Post »Latter-Day-Soldier
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:13pmI wouldn’t apologize….just sayin
Report Post »Wolf
Posted on February 19, 2012 at 6:38amNever apologize or shake hands with your enemy, it’s a sign of weakness.
Report Post »hallkbrdz
Posted on May 11, 2012 at 1:02pmAgree completely. Drone = Target Practice
Report Post »TRILO
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:01pmI fully support hunting and my family are big deer hunters. Have a rule – eat what you kill. But really, how sportsman like is it to shoot at birds being let out of cages.
I am glad that they shot down the drone, now if we could just do the same to the 30000 that congress just approved to fly over our homes, schools, farms, etc.
Report Post »ConstitunalAmerican
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:35pmThe drones and light aircraft fly over farms to limit their size, and to ensure that only a certain amount of food is grown according to the WH. Wonder why – hmmm???
Report Post »Red Bubba
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:29pmBecause you wouldn’t do it, it shouldn’t be allowed? I don’t have a pigeon in this fight, but I don’t have to look up “liberty”. If the drone was over private property, it was a good shoot.
Report Post »flyoverbob
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:30pmTRILO<
Report Post »I would say the bird has a better chance than a deer,after all you wait for the deer to stand still before you take your shot.
I fully approve of deer hunting,I'm just saying it seems the bird has a more sporting chance.
And besides we are talking about dirty stinking pigeons,that crap all over my truck.
food plot 7.62
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:01pmIt looked like a pigeon
Report Post »Latter-Day-Soldier
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:13pm“It’s comin right for us!!”
Report Post »screw
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 7:59pmTime to get a shotgun.
Report Post »so3
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 7:59pmI love how all the sudden these anti-gun and pro-animal people are gun experts…thought it was of a small caliber…. based on what , you fool? A 244 H&H magnum is a small caliber but sounds like an atomic bomb going off… because its 100 grains at 3300fps! Idiots. Hopefully a case like this will end up in a (logical) court and they will find that hovering a camera over a property is invasion of rights. For example, if is it NOT an invasion of rights, how high off the ground must a camera be? If it‘s ’just off the ground’ then a foot off the ground could theoretically be legal…morons…
Report Post »chips1
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:12pmWhen I read it was a small caliber, I pictured a 22. Then I thought, this guy IS good. Made me feel warm inside.
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:21pmBy the same logic, how much airspace are you entitled to above your own property? If you own it all, then nearly every airplane in the sky is routinely trespassing.
In reality, airspace more than 150 meters from people or structures is uncontrolled and owned by the US government.
Report Post »SLARTIBARTFAST
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:33pmGuys, picture a shotgun, not a .22 or a .308. The guys who shot this down were using shotguns for the day, and probably #8 birdshot. This stuff doesn’t travel far, just far enough to cripple this thing and have it dive into the highway.
Incidentally, didn’t big.gov warn everyone about terrorists flying radio-controlled aircraft? For once they were right!
Report Post »so3
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 2:12amFREEDOMPURVEYOR:
When the intent is to view private events on private property, no elevation is too high. Courts have already ruled that you cannot use Google maps, say, to ‘inspect’ the property of a person which you cannot see from a public space.
By your very faulty logic, my 400mm lens is a perfectly legal means to make sure that my neighbors do not abuse their kids, do drugs, beat their dogs, eat too much sugar, commit any mortal sin or cast aspersions on their neighbors via private conversation.
I have a right to privacy…that’s a 360 degree right…. get it?
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 9:12amObviously you’re right S03. Clearly people should not be allowed to fly around cameras and spy on people.
I have heard of cases, however, where it was ruled that things clearly visible from the air can’t expect privacy. Would it be wrong for them take a camera up with them in a hot air balloon? Should it be illegal to take pictures from a helicopter or airplane?
Report Post »Thighmaster
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 7:58pmI suspect the gun accidently discharged as they were mounting their vehicle and unfortunately hit the spy copter… yeah, that’s it..
Report Post »jonhova
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 7:57pmCan I get these guys to come to NYC and shoot some pigeons?
Report Post »chips1
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 2:32pmTheir whole attitude will change when MLK’s statue gets the pidgeon treatment.
Report Post »Ohevi
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 7:56pmAirspace is private property!
Report Post »I’m glad! I have said many times, if I see a spydrone over my house, in my airspace, I’d shoot it down. But I don’t like how this is will portray gun owners, but hehehe that’s really funny!
I just wish that we could take PETA, and shark, and democrats, and liberals, and just like Mel brooks’ history of tge world, put them on a catapult……..pull! Bang bang! Lol!!!!!
wolverine
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 7:56pmFly one of the da## things over my airspace see what happens to it
Report Post »I.Gaspar
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 7:55pmThis was one of the best articles I’ve read in a while.
Report Post »Latter-Day-Soldier
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:17pmI’m saving this one and printing it out
Report Post »Meyvn
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 7:55pmhehe… and there will be more of this kinda crap to come and on a larger scale. hahaha.
Report Post »randy
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:20pmGuess the hunters will bring bigger guns too :) LOL
Report Post »challenger101
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 7:54pm“We are already making plans for a considerably upscaled action in 2013.”
Report Post »***********************************************
Better give it more speed and evasive maneuvers.
Latter-Day-Soldier
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:23pmMaybe even a completely different model; I counted no less than 8 rotors and tail assemblies on that monstrosity, no wonder it pancaked onto the highway after being fired upon.
Report Post »Buck Shane
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:28pmAltitude.
Report Post »Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 7:54pmIt kind of looks like a pidgeon, too bad on of the groups didn’t have a remote control Apache, that would have made a better story.
Report Post »USAMEDIC3008
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:47pmBring back the art of
Report Post »FALCONRY
FreedomPurveyor
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 7:54pmSounds like everyone is dumb in this story
Report Post »steelpanther
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 7:52pmYeah, because no one has any right to privicy anymore, I soupose next they will want to fly the drones into people’s bathrooms next. I had predicted that this would happen to freaks who think they have a right to know what everyone else is doing. Sorry, I support blowing it out the sky, I can understand not wanting someone’s head up my backside.
Report Post »hempstead1944
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 7:52pmFantastic! Great shooting!
Report Post »armorbearer
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 7:55pmGood shot!
Report Post »BOMUSTGO
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 12:16amReal “Gun Control!”
Report Post »Jenny Lind
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 7:52pmThe more I pass by this headlne the harder I laugh. Think they should go shark hunting too. Little snot nosed busibodies.
Report Post »momrules
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 7:50pmWell I for one applaud the ones who shot down the intrusive, spying toy that was deployed by stupid, intrusive, spying idiots.
Report Post »Karena
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 1:36amI wonder how long it will be before they send out the Mockingjays. (Read “The Hunger Games” series.)
Report Post »timej31
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 9:27amIt flew in the path of legitimate bid hunters. The bird-shot was on a friendly trajectory looking for foul when this stupid contraption flew into its path. That is how I see it.
Report Post »ICRedifURBlue
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 7:48pmExcellent………more of the same on the way……..
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 7:47pmNo one owns the Air Space — I call ShotGun Shot colliding with a Drone: an Accident of Concurrent Occupation of a specific space!
Report Post »RiseLiberty
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 4:22amI don’t see them hovering over the occupy wall street vermin. No they gotta go an disturb decent law-abiding folks under the pretext of “protecting animals”. I say next time we use an elephant gun. That‘ll break ’em from sucking eggs.
Report Post »KAdams
Posted on February 18, 2012 at 4:13pmNot to mention all those poor pigeons that were probably skewered and eaten at said OWS camps.
Report Post »