College Chancellor Takes Stand for Gun Rights After Prof. Threatens to Cancel Class Over Gun-Carrying Students
- Posted on August 23, 2012 at 9:32am by
Jonathon M. Seidl
- Print »
- Email »
While the debate over whether the University of Colorado has the right to segregate gun permit-carrying students to separate dorms, the university’s chancellor has just stood up for the rights of those same students to carry guns on campus.
Earlier this week, one professor at the University’s main campus in Boulder threatened to cancel his class if any students showed up legally carrying guns. Physics professor Jerry Peterson declared his stance during a faculty assembly on Monday.
“My own personal policy in my classes is if I am aware that there is a firearm in the class — registered or unregistered, concealed or unconcealed — the class session is immediately canceled,” Peterson said. “I want my students to feel unconstrained in their discussions.”
But on on Wednesday, Chancellor Phil DiStefano squashed the idea in a pointed email to faculty.
“I have the utmost respect for Professor Peterson, who is an old friend and valued colleague, but I want to make clear that if the student carrying the weapon has a concealed-carry permit, the position implied by Professor Peterson’s comments directly violates Colorado law and the operating principles of the campus,” he said according to the Daily Camera.
“On this issue, there can be no ambiguity: all CU-Boulder faculty, as CU and state employees, are expected to teach their assigned courses and to hold classes for all enrolled students,” DiStefano added.
The Daily Camera reports that he also threatened disciplinary action for any professor caught cancelling class because of legal gun owners exercising their right.
The controversy over guns on Colorado campuses came to a head this summer when the state supreme court ruled that schools cannot ban legal, permit-carrying gun owners from carrying their weapons on campus.
“I believe we have taken responsible steps to adhere to the ruling of the Colorado Supreme Court while balancing that with the priority of providing a safe environment for our students, faculty and staff,” DiStefano said last week.
Still, the university’s policy to segregate students in campus housing based on their concealed weapon status has gun rights advocates worried that university is creating a dangerous environment for both those carrying guns and those not.
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 676 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 527 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 398 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 371 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 328 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 265 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 275 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 146 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 147 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 265 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (137)
avgconservative
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 11:35amMaybe THIS issue will get the chicken-squat liberal professors to quit. Replace them with permit-holding, concealed weapon carrying, professors who understand what a crazed maniac can do in 20 seconds!
Report Post »Ironeagle
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 11:51amAmen. The only thing I’d change is “chicken-squat liberal“ to ”panty-waist, Commie-pinko liberal professor”
Report Post »banjarmon
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 1:11pmIf you don’t support the 2nd Amendment and are against guns, I WILL NOT PROTECT YOU WHEN SOME ONE ROBS YOUR HOME OR SOME ONE TRIES TO KILL YOU!
Report Post »turkey13
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 1:48pmIt’s almost a shame my 4 grandsons aren;t in college. I know where I would send them since all 3 of my sons and their wives have carry permits. These kids are like myself and their mother. Only vacation where your carry permit is recognized. Both of my sons that have kids would like to take them to DC and see the Smithsonian but untill things change where people with valid carry permits are recognized it isn’t gonna happen. Without a gun up there you may be the meal of the day.
Report Post »oneshiner
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 1:52pmWOW! Twice in one day the University of Colorado is finally making sense. Usually known as an Ultra-Liberal school, it’s finally showing they stand for American Values. 1st, Thank you for going against that liberal Peterson, who is a panty waist liberal who doesn‘t believe in protection for those who’ve taken classes to be responsible gun owners and can protect themselves. I‘d fire him before I’d let him cancel classes.
2nd. I saw the Prediction by 2 of your professors who claim they’ve been right since 1980 predicting the President. This time they pick Romney. YEAH! Almost makes me begin to like CU, go Bufs.
Kicking out that liar, Ward Churchill, for claiming he was an American Indian was the best thing CU could have done ( Harvard should kick out that. Warren woman for claiming the same thing to get ahead of others who may have been more deserving than this ignorant woman.
Report Post »SLAPTHELEFT
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 2:14pmHe wants discussion to be unrestrained? Really?
What a chump. Isnt he restraining discussion by airing his ultimatums? Little whiny lefties always want to be the final authority of all debate and policies.
The smackdown of the ward churchill wanna be is enlightening. Thank you mr. Chancellor. By the way, all legal carrying gun owners on campus should refrain from using said weapon in defense of sissy peterson should the need arise. Let him beg God for His forgiveness for being an enemy to mans freedom.
Report Post »Alky
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 3:30pmThe left will never understand that proclaiming an area as a gun-free zone turns it into a danger zone and a target for gun toting criminals.
Report Post »black9897
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 3:47pmBet he’ll change his mind when one day those students save his life from a criminal who walks up in that class looking to shoot up the place.
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 4:37pmAs Adult Learning Centers… Colleges & Universities… STARTED… they were Organized & Funded by STUDENTS who paid people whom PROFESSED Knowledge upon Subjects, to come to their place to TEACH!
DO NOT LET THE TAIL SHAKE THE DOG!
Report Post »sweetgold
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 8:59pmReplace them with people who care about what other people think..
Report Post »tothepoint
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 11:34amListen up America.
Report Post »In the past one hundred years, 56 million people have been murdered by their own governments AFTER their governments took away their right to possess weapons.
China and Russia re just two of those countries who murdered their own.
Do the research.
Our founders knew the tyranny that could erupt in a government and tried to protect the citizenry from such.
SLAPTHELEFT
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 2:16pmPreach on Brother!
Report Post »nocomment
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 2:58pmFar too simple, far too logical for the ‘government educated’ sound-bite crowd to grasp.
The average Progressive has the critical thinking ability of a 12 year-old.
Report Post »Dunedainn
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 3:30pmIt was far, FAR more than 56 million. Over 100, actually.
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 4:38pm@ TOTHEPOINT
Report Post »You have a good screen name. You make a great point. I recently read an editorial in a paper saying how people without guns are safer than people with guns (suicide was a big factor). The finer points of that can be debated, but it is clear that POPULATIONS with guns are safer than POPULATIONS without guns. For Progressives/Collectivists isn’t it the GROUP that really matters?
Quiata
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 6:44pm@CHUCK STEIN Nice distinction between individuals and entire populations…MAYBE that would create a crack in some liberal’s framework and get them THINKING!
Report Post »Wartface
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 7:50pmGovernment’s that want total control of the people know…. First you take over the Press and end freedom of speech. Then you force all of the people to turn in all of their firearms. Once that is accomplished, the people are your slave. Google Mao and Stalin. They killed more than 56 million people. Those 2 made Hitler look like an Amature.
Report Post »Jaye Byrd
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 11:24amDorms segergated by those who carry and those who don’t? Any doubts on which dorms would be attacked?
Report Post »Cry_Havoc
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 2:12pmYour point is valid assuming the potential perpetrator/s have a higher than room temperature IQ, and actually find out which dorm have all the sheep in it. A remarkable percentage of criminals repeatedly demonstrate above average ineptitude.
Report Post »oneshiner
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 2:30pmYou can guess which dorm I’d choose.
Report Post »Owt_Raged
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 2:37pmDoesn’t that just pretty much advertise in neon lighting that each of the people in this dorm have a gun, that might still be in their room. Come on in, steal it! Just remember, one of the other CHL students might be home and will shoot you!
Report Post »EDCCO
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 3:14pmIt’s easy – the dorms they are being moved to are off campus. That makes any on-campus dorms fair game. That was a poor decision on CU’s part.
Report Post »Anadara
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 4:14pmIt’ll be the dorm with the sign “Victims Only.”
Report Post »AllLost
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 11:16amThe professor is ultimately responsible for the safety and control of his classroom. If a person has a legally carried firearm and wants to enter my house I have the right to say no unless the firearm is removed. That same right belongs to the professor.
Yes, I think he is wrong. Good citizens carrying protect innocents from bad citizens trying to harm them.
Report Post »Mapache
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 11:33amThe Professor does not own the classroom and in state universities, he is an employee of the state and the state establishes the rules for its universities…if the professor does not like it, he can find another employer.
Report Post »“Unconstrained in their discussions?” Does anybody really get that emotional over physics that guns would be drawn?
QuincySmith
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 11:33amDid you read the Chancellor’s message?
Report Post »jeffile
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 11:35amIf you live in a home owner association area then your refusal could be grounds for action against you. What if a professor stated married gays or illegal aliens would not be permitted in his class? The professor has a responsibility for the protection is a red herring. Let’s go one step further. What if the professor would not hold class if any blacks attended?
Report Post »Herndo
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 11:36am@ALLLOST
Yes the professor has that right, (IN HIS OWN HOUSE!) An employee of the State of Colorado does not get to choose which rights of his tuition paying students he gets to violate, be their 1st, 2nd or 4th amendment rights.
You can refuse to allow people to carry guns in your house and you can even refuse to have them speak in your house if you like, but not in public.
Report Post »ALOHA-SNACKBAR
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 11:36amAllLost
Report Post »“The professor is ultimately responsible for the safety and control of his classroom. If a person has a legally carried firearm and wants to enter my house I have the right to say no unless the firearm is removed. That same right belongs to the professor.”
The same right DOES NOT apply to the professor because it is not the professors real, personal property. It, the classroom, is the property of the State of Colorado and the tax payers. The Constitution of the State of Colorado does not stop at the professors classroom door.
scboolitcaster
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 11:36amYou would be correct, except for the fact that the classroom is not the professor’s property.
It is the university’s property, and the law says that students can carry there.
This is not an elementary school. The students are adults and as such, responsible for their own well being.
Report Post »Talmid of Yeshua
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 11:37amYou are wrong. In your home, yes, you can tell someone no firearms allowed. This professor doesn’t have that right. He is an employee, and he doesn’t own that property. The 2nd Amendment trumps his liberal anti-American theology. (I call it theology, and not ideology, because liberalism is a cult of Satan).
Report Post »mtnman40
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 11:37amAllloist, your home is NOT funded and paid for by the tax payers of Colorado, but the Univeristy is. Your comparison holds no water. State law says that if a state funded University wants to ban firearms they have to provide metal detectors at all entrances and provide security guards. So if th professor wants to follow the law, like us concealed carry holders do, he needs to kick out some cash for proper security. Also, what if this professor decided it was in the interest of his class safety to keep a certain skin color out, or not allow “red necks” in his class? Would he have the ultimate say in this as the leader of the class? I think not! Law would not allow that, just like the law is NOT allowing him to ban legal concealed carry holders.
Report Post »az11697
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 11:56amIf a student is injured in class the university is sued, not the individual instructor. So who is responsible for their safety?
Report Post »mecanic
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 11:58am@alllost……….idiot, your wrong it’s not his home, it’s a PUBLIC UNIVERSITY. sorry skippy.
Report Post »Amarilloan
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 12:02pmThe Professor has only the rights in his classroom granted by the college board of trustees. If he wishes not to teach to a classroom of students in which there is a legally owned firearm, then the right he has is to quit. This professor is not above the law.
Report Post »Make My Day
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 12:18pmThen that holds true that he is ultimately responsible for any one killed in his class. Try to make that stick.
Report Post »Jaycen
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 12:38pmSorry, Alllost, the professor does not have that “right”. Your right extends from your right to private property ownership. The professor does not have private property ownership rights in a classroom provided by his employer.
If the university was a private university, they could refuse gun-carrying students and be well within their rights. As a public university, they do not have the right to refuse.
Report Post »Cry_Havoc
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 2:17pm@MAPACHE: “Whachu sayin? Oh really?” POP!-POP!-POP! “The Higgs boson does exist beeaawch!”
Report Post »AllLost
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 2:27pmAh the constructive criticism it is just like libs yelling at conservatives with the same facts and figure…oh wait there are none.
A professor has the right to ask anyone to leave his class. The student has the right to appeal. The professor has the right to demand no recordings. The professor has a great many rights in his classroom.
Yes it may be state property, but the class session is the professors, and he has a great amount of leeway in his dealings there.
Yes, I did read what the Chancellor said, and I hope TheBlaze prints the faculty associations rebuttal.
Any of you that posted work on a college campus, or are you professors?
Please keep posts like this coming because your use of the arena of thoughts and ideas is too awesome for me to comprehend.
“@alllost……….idiot, your wrong it’s not his home, it’s a PUBLIC UNIVERSITY. sorry skippy”
Well peanut butter I guess legally held firearms are allowed in every public facility….oh no wait they are not. But it is a very persuasive argument you used there. I bet you went to one of Becks’ shows that talked all about love being the way to move forward.
Report Post »oneshiner
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 2:36pmALLLOST. please send your address so I never come to your house by mistake. (now all the little criminals will know where to come because they know they’re safe at your house)
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 3:35pmALLLOST, Nice argument, but just what part of the school loosing it’s case in the Supreme Court do you not understand. The court said that the school could not stop students from legal concealed carry of a firearm, and that professor publicly issued a demand that violated the court’s ruling. Yes, he does have a lot of lee way in how he conducts himself in his class room, and the power to make students depart for a variety of reasons. But, not even he can violate the state’s law or court ruling.
Report Post »Rickfromillinois
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 5:30pmHe does NOT have the right. He is not in charge. If he or she refuses to teach then they can and should be fired.
Report Post »duketurner
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 11:13amNow if we could only get people to stand up and fight the FFRF when they attack the freedom of religion. Great job doing the right thing Chancellor DiStefano.
Report Post »jungle J
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 11:03ampeterson is a trouble making progressive.
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 10:51amFire Jerry Peterson. This is no different than a professor infringing on a students civil rights.
Report Post »Mapache
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 11:35amHe does not need to be fired. He was informed of the requirements and the standards of the University. He can comply or look for another employer….move on….nothing to see here….he probably thought he would become a cause celeb speaking truth to power….now he’ll end up just on MSNBC and seen by their tens of viewers.
Report Post »Le Sellers
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 11:40amCarrying a weapon is a civil right. In Colorado, no political sub-entity can override the state laws regarding concealed and unconcealed carrying.
Mr. O’bama, where are the Jobs?
Report Post »scrapadapolis
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 10:35amI didn’t know campus dorms had a place on their forms that ACTUALLY asked if you carry,And also for that fact Has anyone ever delt with UNARMED campus security?It’s kinda like this stop!!Really!!No I mean it.Don’t make me call the police!O‘hell he’s comming back!
Report Post »Amarilloan
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 12:06pmI would like to see a story about how many students request dorm rooms where conceal/carry is allowed. Bet most do.
Report Post »john vincent
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 10:26amMr Peterson has been taught well, and is now passing off this ‘supposed’ learning in academia. He has been taught that law abiding, mind you, law abiding citizens are a threat to their surroundings, and should be deprived of certain rights, because he has made himself judge and jury.
Please do not cite the instances of massacres by criminals; these are not law abiding Americans. Now, kudos to Chancellor DiStefano for a reasonable contribution to this unfortunate discussion. He understands that ‘concealed’ carry is just that, and is not an issue until Mr Peterson makes it an issue.
Mr Peterson, maybe you should visit a gun show, one of the safest places in town.
Report Post »yougottabekidding
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 12:21pmAlways carry legal and concealed. The element of surprise gives
Report Post »the advantage.
Never answer the question except by LEO, it’s a medical device!
kalayaan
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 10:16amWow what a smart college chancellor!!!…I wish all university and college chancellors are as smart as he is….
Report Post »texastommy
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 2:03pmIt‘s not that he’s smarter, it’s because he has cajones. Big, hairy, cajones. I salute him.
Report Post »Displacedsoutherner
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 10:16amThis professor probably still thinks the police prevent crimes rather than showing up to investigate afterwards.
Unless a policeman happens to be standing next to you at the convenience store when the would-be robber shows up you’re pretty much on your own for the next 10 to 20 minutes.
It would seem like a scientist would understand the evidence that has been clearly shown many times in the past, that a person legally carrying a concealed firearm tends to save innocent lives rather than take them.
EVERYONE who objects to the legal carrying of firearms needs to watch this video from a survivor of the Luby‘s Cafeteria shooting spree in the ’90′s: (Notice how C. Schumer looks like he smells something bad the whole time)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1u0Byq5Qis
Report Post »jimbo_from_suwanee
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 10:16amAny professor, politician, or anyone with power over a group who takes this stand against the 2nd, should be forced for five years have a sign in their front yard that says, “I believe that American should be firearm free!” See if it makes them feel safer to make their stance known to criminals.
Report Post »Frodo RinosBane
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 10:15amI support that professor’s right to quit his job and move to New York where he can surround himself with mind-numbed robots who all spout the same thing to each other every day.
Report Post »avgconservative
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 11:32amHere-here! Hear-hear!
Report Post »reality based lifeform
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 10:14amIf CCW weapons doesn’t violate the state law or school policy then the offended professor should resign and go to another school compatable with his misguided viewpoint
Report Post »TheMajority
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 10:08amMothers, don’t let your kids hang out in gun free zones.
Why is there a case not made, that it is dangerous to be in a gun free zone? I am tired of being insulted by gun control folk, telling us that a legal carry person, would not defend him/her self, other people, and this gun control professor, in the face of a deranged person in the act of shooting people.
Have you noticed they are called “assault rifles”, and not “defense rifles”?, when all but a hand full are actually purchased for defense, or target shooting? “Assault” means “to attack”, but I don’t know anybody who has that intention.
Professor and others, it is a “defense rifle”, and that would be proven, in your classroom, saving lives, should the need arise. The worst shootings around the world, happen in gun free zones. Fact, or not Professor?
Report Post »THX-1138
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 10:07am“I want my students to feel unconstrained in their discussions.”
So, he figures a gunfight will break out over a disagreement on PHYSICS?
Fire this idiot. He can’t be very bright.
Report Post »NOT A CRAZY
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 10:15amActually if he really wanted to teach them physics he should take them out to the shooting range. Now that is a physics class I might actually want to attend. What kind of debate takes place in a physics class anyway?
Report Post »Quiata
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 6:40pm@NOT A CRAZY Right! The perfect way to demonstrate ballistics AND teach Calculus! (And why Calculus was invented in the first place!)
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 9:59amno wait, this is good, another communist ‘teacher’ just identified himself in our schools. we’re just waiting for the time to get rid of it. after Jan 2013 all this school communism should CHANGE immediately. if it’s a communist, throw it OUT.
Report Post »==
45 DECLARED GOALS of the COMMUNIST TAKEOVER of AMERICA (1963)
15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States .
16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.
18. Gain control of all student newspapers.
19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.
20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.
21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to “eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.”
and the list goes on…
Liberalismsamentaldisorder
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 10:11amHmmm, looks like they‘re right on track doesn’t it?
Report Post »normalmom
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 4:57pmGot a name for the entire list?
Report Post »Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 9:52amBoulder is a cesspool, and this professor is one of the turds. The problem is he sees a student with a gun and he wets himself, mostly because it triggers a psychological response that remindes him he isn’t really a man. It reminds him of all those years his mother made him wear dresses and called him Sally.
So the real reason he doesn’t like guns, is a mother complex and his adversion to being called Sally.
Report Post »johnjamison
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 10:03amThe article said
Report Post »Still, the university’s policy to segregate students in campus housing based on their concealed weapon status has gun rights advocates worried that university is creating a dangerous environment for both those carrying guns and those not.
That is a half truth what the college did by segregating the gun owners doesn’t place the gun owners in danger fact is it point out which area criminals need to stay out of and which areas have easy targets.
NOT A CRAZY
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 10:07amThat is a serious insult to turds. You should apologize.
Report Post »JACKTHETOAD
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 10:15amSpot-on analysis. How much do you charge for individual sessions? …just wonderin’…
Report Post »Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 10:17amI will not appologize to turds until they appologize for ruining my favorite pair of running shoes. Turds started this, I am just finishing it, besides, who among us will stand up and make “Turds rights” one of their platform issues? Besides the Green party who are made up of turds and POS’s.
Report Post »RANGER1965
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 10:18amThanks for that, It’s nice to start the day with a belly laugh.
Report Post »Dismayed Veteran
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 2:08pmEveryone dies. The student who selects an unarmed dorm is stupid. And stupid is a really bad reason for dying.
Report Post »normalmom
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 5:00pmHey now don’t dis women, I have my gun picked out and when will have it when we can afford it. And do plan to have a carry permit.
Report Post »FREEDOMoverFEAR
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 7:08pmTurds fertilize the earth so plants can grow. So you hate plants. If plants die so does the Earth. So you hate Earth. ALL RIGHT WINGERS HATE EARTH! Boom new democratic talking speech. Man I amaze myself sometimes call up that ugly bitc5 Debbie.
Report Post »gdbhusker
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 9:51amwhat?????? you mean a college professor is trying to use liberal radicalism at a university to influence students?????I tell you what.. someone should tell all those college liberal nazis, that a degree in 2012 is utterly WORTHLESS!!! and that soon kids will no longer want , or need, to get their degrees for a decent job…then we can quit dealing with these freakin idiots~!!!
Report Post »NOT A CRAZY
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 10:08amWhat would be shocking is if you could actually find a prof who isn’t a Leftist propaganda machine.
Report Post »hillbillyinny
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 10:23am@ gobhusker
I think you are right on track! I know I don’t want “college grads” from today working for or with me!!! First, they’re book smart and experience lacking! They have lots of “thoughts” but no COMMON SENSE! They want to “start at the top” rather than PAYING THEIR DUES!
Sorry, give me the kid that was raised and helped on a farm and I will show you someone who understand the need for real work and the rewards of real work, personal and for the good of the equipment and others in his care and for the good of humanity in general.
Keep the degree and give me the personal experience. Anyone can teach themselves what they need to know to get ahead in REAL WORK!
Report Post »texastommy
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 2:08pmNot A Crazy,
There are more than you think. Most of us just don’t advertise our sanity to the idiot, leftist pinkos that we are forced to call colleagues, that’s all.
Report Post »GroundZero is Nuclear Demolition x3
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 9:45amI would like to paraphrase Eisenhower- If you want absolute security go to prison, you will have everything but FREEDOM.
Report Post »Liberalismsamentaldisorder
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 9:49amExchanging freedom for security always assures that you wind up with neither.
Report Post »Sirfoldallot
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 9:54amHow true. I wouldn’t want 2 go 2 school with out a gun now days.
Report Post »charliechatbox
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 10:17amI’m really beginning to wonder why some call them self educated? Research shows that “Gun Free” zones are where criminals do their business, no threat from the unarmed Law Abiding Citizens.
Report Post »Liberalismsamentaldisorder
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 9:42amI will cancel class if somebody shows up who disagress with me because I want my students to feel unrestrained. what a freaking hypocrite. hey prof, you think anybody who LEGALLY carries like the CONSTITUTION allows feels restrained as a result of your idiotic statement? if it weren’t for double standards, libs wouldn’t have any at all.
Report Post »RightUnite
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 9:38amGood for the Chancellor….
Report Post »biffo
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 9:38amWe must stop these control-freak, child abusers, at every turn. They have destroyed education and generations of young minds. We need to change the man hating, educational complex back to a merit based, world leader in all things academic. The frauds and grant thieves need to follow the rules or hit the road.
Report Post »shogun459
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 9:55amToo Too late
Report Post »biffo
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 10:29amThe time is right. The black racist fraud obama has given these cretins an excuse to expose themselves, and they have. We now know that from kindergarten to MBA these academic frauds are only looking to turn our children into useful idiot, asexual drones. Emasculate the male from kindergarten (if he survives the baby killers) and promote the illiterate, cruel types. It’s on we taxpaying adults to protect our children, or not. One by one we will eliminate these devils, just as one by one, we deport illegal criminals. Hide under the covers and you get what you deserve. Become able to defend yourself and lead, follow, or get out of the way.
Report Post »jakartaman
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 9:37amGood for the Chancellor!
Report Post »TIME_THE_AVENGER
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 9:36amYou know those online colleges? HE can teach from home too. Pity it’s come to this.
Report Post »oldguy49
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 9:40amnot sure i would want him teaching me or mine………..get enough lib bs from news
Report Post »NOT A CRAZY
Posted on August 23, 2012 at 10:11amSounds to me like he doesn’t need to be “teaching” anything to anybody anywhere. A nice pink jumpsuit might fit him better.
Report Post »