Comedian Chris Rock ‘Attacks’ Camera During Encounter With Conservative Author
- Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:31am by
Billy Hallowell
- Print »
- Email »
Conservative commentator and author Jason Mattera has his eyes set on Hollywood, as his new book “Hollywood Hypocrites” takes aim at liberal celebrities who have supported President Barack Obama.
In a video clip attached to his promotion of the book, Mattera approaches comedian Chris Rock and questions him about disparaging comments he’s made about the Tea Party and racism. The video takes a bizarre turn when Rock “attacks” the camera that is recording his interaction with the author.
The incident, which apparently occurred January 23, 2012, first shows Mattera telling the actor and comedian that he’s a fan and nicely asking Rock for a picture. Then, Mattera goes in for the kill.
“Chris, when you said that the Tea Party was insanely racist — Chris, when you said…,” Mattera asked, but before he could finish, Rock reacted.
This question was referencing comments the comedian made in an interview with Esquire Magazine last year. He said:
“When I see the Tea Party and all this stuff, it actually feels like racism’s almost over. Because this is the last — this is the act up before the sleep,” ”They’re going crazy. They’re insane. You want to get rid of them — and the next thing you know, they’re f—— knocked out.”
It is important to note a few elements here. First and foremost, the audio goes out once Rock pushes the camera out of the way. So, we have no idea what was said following the camera incident.
Also, Mattera’s strategy of approaching opponents and surprising them (or “ambushing” them as some have described it) has come under fire in the past. While some admire the information he is able to gather, not everyone — even some conservatives — believes that setting figures up with on-the-spot questioning is the best way to get viable answers. The Blaze will be exploring this discussion more in the future.
See the clip, below:
This story has been updated.
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 676 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 527 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 398 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 371 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 328 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 265 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 275 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 146 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 147 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 265 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (371)
Lion420
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:58amNot everyone believes that setting figures up and then asking them on-the-spot questions is the best way to get viable answers. Chris Rock’s answer spoke volumes. Showed exactly who he is. He’s a feeble-minded child. He gets violent, because he’s out of ideas. He’s wrong, and on some level he knows it, so the immature boob starts swinging. What happens when you question and try to correct a spoiled child? They throw a tantrum.
Report Post »HorseCrazy
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:44amThe left loves this tactic but instead of asking questions they throw glitter in your face or just start chanting nonsense not wanting a response like a spoiled child.
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:52amIf they HARM you in the GOOD TIMES… WHAT will they do to you in the BAD TIMES?
Report Post »cessna152
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:57amOkay lets compare the two because Chris Rock love OWS:
OWS: Over 3000 arrests, 4 deaths, over 100 rapes, shots fired at the white house, threats and attacks on kids walking to school, video of violence, destruction and looting, defecating on streets, Churches, cop cars; Threatened cops and their families. Trash left behind.
Tea Party: No arrests, No deaths, no rapes, NO racism, peaceful, no trash left behind.
Gee, I think Mr. Rock is quite delusional.
Report Post »theknight70
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 12:05pmWhy not use these surprist tactics. 60 Minutes became a number one prime time news show in the 1960‘s and 1970’s using these same type of tactics. The left can dish it out but they cannot take it being used against them or thrown back against them. LOL!!!
Report Post »Mainer forever
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 12:07pmThank you Cessna 152.
Report Post »TheePolitinator
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 12:07pmSetting them up? they are setting up every American with their hate filled donations, all to destroy a society that gave them fame and fortune. If you honestly think I feel bad for “on the spot questions”. Then you are highly mistaken. High gas and communism don’t effect them, it’s an elite ruling class, a monarchy and not what this REPUBLIC was built on. If he didn’t want to get questioned he should;d have never made the comment in the first place.
Report Post »Dstarr55
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 12:10pmLion, I agree, I am not fond of the ambush style of journalism but to be fair it is the only way you can get some of these leftist away from their scripted talking points. Chris Rock would never allow himself to be interviewed by someone that would challenge his insane rants because they are not founded on actual evidence but on his ideology that all things ‘right’ is bigoted, racist and attached to some kind of phobia. He believes the Tea Party must be racists because they are against a black President – not because they are in fact against his policies. When push comes to shove, and the left sure do like to shove, they can’t justify their rhetoric so they resort to name calling, demonization and in this case, violence.
Report Post »dfresh
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 12:20pmJust another “Drone”. Way to go Chris, and at one time I thought you were an independent logical thinker. Guess not!
Report Post »netmail
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 12:22pmChris Rock’s mom use to rock him to sleep as a baby. I wish she would have used real rocks.
Report Post »marhee9
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 12:24pmIf you listen to the left they say there aren’t any black tea party members, even though there are several. They say there are no hispanic tp members, even though there are several. They say they’re all old white men, even though they aren’t. Remember, Obama didn’t bow, even though it’s on video.
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMToF_H7rqM
yougottabekidding
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 12:28pmWas he arrested for assalt which is what clearly happened?
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 12:29pm@ Lion420
That‘s because Chris Rock would still be in Brooklyn If Wanda Sykes didn’t write his material:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wanda_Sykes
She made him funny. Without her, he is a washed up has been.
Report Post »Goodforall
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 12:40pmOMG-if that is how they want to play then every so called moderator for the GOP debates should be removed. They do this all of the time. The double standard in this country is ridiculous.
Report Post »MYHEROISRON
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 12:41pmI’d like to hit Chris in the head with a Rock. Maybe that would knock the ‘liberalism’ out of that thick skull of his …
Report Post »Kraus79
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 12:41pmYou know, I’m not going to begrudge Chris Rock for anything here. He’s a guy who is in the middle of a crowded hallway at Sundance, was asked for a picture by a guy Chris thought was a fan and was set up to answer an on-the-spot question. Celebrities aren’t always equipped for this kind of sneak attack. They are people like everyone else and flip out. He’s always got cameras around him, people always hounding him, I mean, give the guy a freaking break. He‘s entitled to his opinions and doesn’t have to answer anyone’s question. You saw that he was trying to get away and he was cornered. Sorry, but Chris wasn’t entirely at fault here.
Report Post »cessna152
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 12:55pm@Kraus79,
So you’re saying that lying about and slandering without any proof is okay? Sorry, but if you‘re gonna’ shoot your mouth off and make up stories be prepared. This is part of being in Hollywood and these Marxist freaks aren’t used to being called out. We have sat silent way TOO long and now when Conservatives finally call out people for lying you stick up for the Marxists? Chris could have simply walked away…right? So next time I am questioned by a looney Marxist at a Tea party I can grab his camera and throw it after cursing them out as well…right? Wake up….
Report Post »p2nya
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 12:58pmIt also seemed that either Rock was high on something or very, very sleepy. Maybe he should ‘go to sleep’.
Report Post »motonutt
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 1:15pmThis guy is nothing but a loud mouth racist punk……
Report Post »Vegasdad702
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 1:27pmAlright now im irritated because your going to make me defend Chris Rock and I don’t really care for his views or comments, but come on… The guy walks up, says “Chris im a fan, can I get a picture with you?” You can see Rock is annoyed but agrees to do so, and then say’s “alright man.” turns back to his conversation, and is immediately chased and asked about a tea party remark which we know is not a nice thing to do as a fan. Of coarse Rock gets PO’d I would too! I hope I wouldn’t react the way he did, but man you poke a dog with a stick, you might get bit! Im just saying. Now that said, i’ve been seeing some shady stuff from the Blaze lately in its bias and distortion of stories. I am a huge fan of Glenn Beck, have supported this web site from the gate, and I expect YOU to do what you say you do, and thats STAND IN THE BLAZE OF THE TRUTH! AND GIVE US REAL NEWS! This story and some other ones are really bordering on the MSNBC style of reporting! Be the example of real journalism PLEASE! Thank you, Oh and to my fellow Bloggers on here, PLEASE stop the NAME CALLING and DISGUSTING INSULTS! We are conservatives and we should act with not only respect for those who don’t respect themselves, but we should respect OURSELVES as well. THANK YOU and GOD BLESS.
Report Post »zorro
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 1:30pmIt‘s fair criticism but it’s also a fair question. If you’re going to run your mouth about any group, it’s fair to ask you about it. He didn’t have to answer, no one does. But I don’t see how anyone would have a problem with the question being asked.
Report Post »000degrees
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 2:11pmThe entertainment value here is so-so- The actual value of what he says or thinks is zero…who cares..
Report Post »yiska8
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 2:18pmLooking more and acting more like the crack addict named Pookie, he played in “New Jack City”. Liberalism is the drug of choice today.
Report Post »MIBUGNU2
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 2:35pmOh !! I don’t think a BILLION solar panels arent going
Report Post »to do the JOB either…That makes Me Racist too !!
The Truth Burns
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 2:43pmVegasDad,
Report Post »I agree that conservatives need to be careful not to fall victim to the progressive hate. That doesn‘t mean passion and strength aren’t shown, but I think the right struggles with communication sometimes. Anyway, at first I disagreed with this man’s actions. However,AI think people like this are necessary right now because we need to go down all avenues before its too late. Would I do what he does, no, but what he does is not illegal and is only asking questions. If actions like this prevent violent means down the road, then by all means this NEEDS to be done in order to shed light on the darkness. To show hypocrisy and challenge the left’s propaganda is the bottom line here. As for The Blaze doing stories like MSNBC, I have to disagree. This is a right leaning news source, which doesn‘t mean there can’t be a standard. However, right leaning none the less. This clip and story belongs here and was questioned rightfully. Keep questioning though and God Bless.
Patrick Henry II
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 2:48pmNow we know who the evil one is. He is either a racist or just a commie not wanting to be exposed or just small minded. .
Report Post »MIBUGNU2
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 2:52pmI object to this CORRUPT administration dumping BILLIONS of
$$$$$$$$$$$$ down the TOILET…That Makes Me Racist !!!!!!
I object to this CORRUPT administration suing the State of AZ
for enforcing our LAWS…Oh, Yea !! that makes Me Racist !!!!!!
I object to this CORRUPT administration giving WEAPONS to
Report Post »Mexican Cartels…Now the main JOB of the DOJ (Holder) is to
make sure Felons and Illegals can VOTE..HOW F’N SICK IS
THAT ??????? You don’t have to think about this for long to
know “THIS IS WRONG”…….. But this is OK with Obama
mattmo79
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 2:54pmChris was acting like a mad black woman!!
Report Post »bucklywheat
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 2:58pmDitto. and so well said. Not a fan of CR, but I wouldn’t like being blindsided either. .
Report Post »KevINtampa
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 3:54pm@cessna
You forgot to add the Neo Nazi types that have also endorsed and showed up to OWS “events”.
Lets just face it. It’s a matter of good and evil.
Tea Party: Motivated by Love of God and/or Liberty
OWS: Motivated by Hate of God and/or Liberty
So if I hate God and want to be considered dependent on government, I’m an “Occupier”. I might be a racist Neo Nazi, I might be a Jew, I might be and atheist, I might be African, Chinese, Indian, Russian, or Vulcan, I might be a socialist, I might be a corporatist, I might be a socialist, I might be anonymous. But the one thing I am, hate filled. It’s why people have a hard time trying to figure out what OWS actually stands for. They don’t stand for anything, they only stand because of hate, and the interesting this is they share hate not only for those who only want to Liberate them, they share the hate they have for each other.
It really is interesting to watch how this is evolving. I mean, the current developments of the Nation of Islam in regards to their Messiah, is a microcosm of what the future of OWS is. Soon, they will turn on the ones they stand next to now, its what always happens when you stand next to someone out of a shared hate.
Report Post »turkey13
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 5:21pmJust added Chris Rock to my No Fly list with Woppie, Strisand and many more. He reminds me of and aunt that called herself a Christan. About 55 years ago whhile getting a drink at the courthouse (I was about 6 and couldn’t read) chewed me out for drinking out of the Colored water fountain. I looked at both fountains and couldn’t see any difference.
Report Post »loriann12
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 5:21pmI think just the hypocracy of being a millionare and supporting OWS is enough to condemn him. It’s like multimilllionare stars claiming to be a bee keeper so the get a break on their property taxes. Or saying they’re a farmer, when they’re really a TV/Movie star making millions to exploit some loop hole in the taxes meant to give true farmers a break. I’m tempted to exploit the amount of Native American I have just to get a break, I mean everyone else is doing it….and Obama is half white and half Native African, but calls himself the first black president.
Report Post »Patriot Z
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 6:55pmi agree its dirty, but thats how we have to play now. if they got a list of the questions or thought it was going to be anything other than the liberal circle jerk, they would never come on or answer anything. Libs love to say this stuff because they believe they are above challenging. you see how not just chris, but all libs act when confronted with what they say and a simple request to clarify. they dont know what they are saying or talkign about half the time thats why they get so angry. do a comparision btw a true left wing celeb like rosanne barr who truly believes what she is saying(she is still wrong) anfd celebs like rock who make a living disparaging conservatives with no understanding of who we are. there is a big difference
Report Post »P C BE DAMNED
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 9:40pmThese people live their entire life hate filled towards white people and all their hate is based on lies and hate speech. We will go on and live out lives being hated for no good reason and called ugly names. But somebody needs to be jailed for all the lies. Truth will win out one day. By the way I met an Obama supporter communist the other day and my blood ran cold to know I was near one.
Report Post »Jaycen
Posted on March 15, 2012 at 12:34amI wonder if Mattera’s critics love to watch TMZ? I’m just asking the question.
Regardless of the criticism of unnamed hypocrites, Mattera has every right to do what he does. Chris Rock has the right to speak his mind. Chris Rock has the right to walk away. Chris Rock has the right to ignore Mattera. Chris Rock has the right to look Mattera in the eye and tell explain the error of Mattera’s ways.
Chris Rock does not have the right to assault an American citizen who says, or asks, things Chris Rock doesn’t like.
Report Post »NoNannyState4me
Posted on March 15, 2012 at 2:45amI think Pookie ought to settle down. I‘d like to see an interview where he answers for his hate speech and watch him squirm by passing it off as comedy when it’s purely a racist bias on his part. I believe he should be able to say it, but until I see a serious interview with him over it then I hope he gets a surprise reporter that runs into him every week at least.
Until then, he’s just crackhead Pookie from New Jack City.
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on March 15, 2012 at 3:35amKraus…. completely disagree with you.
Report Post »Set up or not, Chris very easily could have said “I’m not talking to you” and that would be it. Instead he immediately resorts to violence?? Come on, man. He must have an EXTREMELY short fuse.
JJ Coolay
Posted on March 15, 2012 at 3:43ami agree its dirty, but thats how we have to play now.
_____________________
Dirty?
Report Post »All he did was ask a question about something Chris Rock spoke about.
All Chris has to say is “no comment”
TAXEVERYONE
Posted on March 15, 2012 at 8:25amWho the he’ll cares about Chris Rock? This is about getting rid of Obama and Soros people!
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on March 15, 2012 at 8:32amMr. Rock’s “Everybody Hates Chris” was one of the most racist shows on tv and it was supposedly a FAMILY show. They were constantly disparaging whitey on the show and making it out to be that only whites were racists. As far as I am concerned, Chris Rock is no better than David Duke, Louis Farrakan, and other racists.
Report Post »Vegasdad702
Posted on March 16, 2012 at 6:35amThank you for your thoughtful and intelligent response “TheTruthBurns”. I really am going to think about what you have said. I believe you just gave me faith that there are some people on here that are able to make their point without name calling. I just don’t want my conservative friends to fall into bad habits. I will try to be a little more patient. Thank you and God bless. :)
Report Post »Nevermind
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:57amOh boy, anothe “black man attacks” video. Lets not even talk about how the person who went up to him was there under a false pretence. Also when asked he tried to walk away and got followed then pushed the camera away. He was nice to the guy when he said he was a fan and took a photo, onc he realized he was being lied to in order to do an ambush video he tried to leave, the guy wanted more and he got it.
But i am sure you wioll all call Chris Rock a racist , socialist marxist and say he hates white people. Spooky black man videos. LMAO
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:06amHey Chriws, use this one.
Barry walks into a bar with a duck
The bartender say’s”Where did you get the Jacka$$?”
Barry looks puzzled( Common expression),and replies, “It’s a duck”.
The bartender says“ I was talking to the duck”.
Like Nancy P said to me
Report Post »You’re only a comedian.
Godfather.1
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:07amExactly. Why else do you think this is posted on here? It’s only for purpose of bringing out the racist comments we have all come to expect from the Blaze.
broker0101
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:10amI’m sure you have NO problem with Michael Moore using this EXACT same ambush-filmaking tactic for decades, do you, Pinhead?
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:11amYou know… in a way I kind of agree with you.
BUT. Chris Rock could have just walked away and kept his hands to himself. There is a fine line these days with ambush media (even the one’s I like) getting in your face and space. At what point do they get their arse handed to them when they get too close? Rock should have walked away.
Report Post »Hayabusa
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:12amOddly enough similar or worse tactics are acceptable to liberals when progressives are behind the underhanded approach. But congratulations on reinforcing the liberal meme that when someone does something wrong, ‘they are simply a victim.”
Oh how tragic, poor Chris Rock being challenged on playing the race card (yes, that makes him a racist). We know, we know, that‘s against the proggies’ rules.
The funny part is when Chris is presented with the facts he responds like typical immature liberal repeatedly muttering “yeh, yeh, yeh, yeh…” so as not to have to hear the truth of his own words. Most people grow out of that by the age of eight but power to Chris for keeping it alive as an adult.
Report Post »Izzy2626
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:12amDoesnt dispell the racist rhetoric Chris used against the Tes Party in and interview does it?
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:12amSeems Rustnoggin has met ,, spoken extensivly with EVERY blazer done a detailed statistical study , and come up with ONE Blazer Racist. Which One?
Report Post »Hayabusa
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:16amOh my god, there’s a liberal progressive minority in the picture/video/article showing bad behavior! Quick, everyone grab your race cards we have to be ready to defend them.
Report Post »dblaess
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:19ambroker0101
Report Post »Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:10am
I’m sure you have NO problem with Michael Moore using this EXACT same ambush-filmaking tactic for decades, do you, Pinhead?
———————————————————————————————————————————-
This may be Michael’s only claim to fame and anyone who does it most likely is a “pinhead” just as Michael is. I see you do not use your real name. George is this you yet again?
Locked
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:22am@13th imam
“Seems Rustnoggin has met ,, spoken extensivly with EVERY blazer done a detailed statistical study , and come up with ONE Blazer Racist. Which One?”
I can name at least two off the top of my head, and neither of them have posted here yet. Should we go through the comments here and list everyone who made a comment about Rock’s race being a factor in his behavior?
The incident is telling because of the direction of Mattera’s material: liberal hypocrisy. Not racial hypocrisy, not black people being thugs, but, like some have pointed out, that liberals can ambush people and not get called on it nearly as often. The people here who made comments about his race and NOT his political views? They reveal that race is the key issue for them.
You still want that list?
Report Post »Bible Quotin' Science Fearin' Conservative American
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:22amIt’s good to see comments that see things the way they are here on this website.
Notice they put attacked in the headline as ‘attacked’ because it’s BS.
Chris Rock has to deal with paparazzi all the time. He’s probably sick of it. The tag at the end of the video should have said, “Harass someone, get attacked.”
Report Post »WATCHMAN15
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:24amGee, does it hurt when the Right uses a common Leftist tactic used over and over by the top dogs of the Lame Left Stream Media to ambush the Right? Rolling On The Floor Laughing My Axelrod Off.
Report Post »Bible Quotin' Science Fearin' Conservative American
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:26amFor all you know, Rock pushed the camera lens aside and the guy waved the camera around like an idiot to make it look a certain way. They went there with an agenda, you know. Be as critical of them as you are of everything liberal. You never see Rock again in the video once he pushes the camera aside. It‘s not like there’s any proof he ATTACKED the guy.
What a crock of red meat for you teatard racists.
Report Post »skiz
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:32amNevermind
Report Post »drago
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:39amOh look, encinom, aka nevermind, steelhead etc…is talking to himself again.encinom, you’re such a little pos puke…..
Report Post »Teufel Hunden
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:39amSpeaking of ambush tactics, Chris needs to save that anger for someone who would throw glitter in his face. Oh yeah, those are leftist tactics. Nevermind!
Report Post »Mainer forever
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:40amGood one 13 Imam
Report Post »jeffile
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:41amMy only question is: Is Chris Rock racist or a typical intolerant liberal?
Report Post »inexiletill2012
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:41amSTEELHEAD
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:06am
the Blazers have a deep seated fear of blacks, one even thinks the {resident hates white people.
GODFATHER.1
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:07am
Exactly. Why else do you think this is posted on here? It’s only for purpose of bringing out the racist comments we have all come to expect from the Blaze.
YOU TWO ARE IDIOTS…there are no racists here…people who dislike Obama/Fascism & anti-colonialists …yes… doesn’t mean they are racists
Report Post »Michael61
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:50am@TechEngineer.
Actually, I don’t think that Chris Rock is such a racist. He is probably getting his information from stupid mass media who play that race card all the time (it is the only one they have).
Find on youtube a funny sketch by Chris Rock.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/its-the-n-s-girls-forced-to-leave-school-over-racist-rant/
“There’s a civil war going on with black people – there’s black people, and there’s n—–s, and every time black people want to have a good time, n—–s f–k it up,” Chris Rock says in the routine. “Man, I love black people, but I hate n—–s, I wish they’d let me join the Ku Klux Klan!”
Report Post »Hayabusa
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:51amLocked, please do the work.
“Should we go through the comments here and list everyone who made a comment about Rock’s race being a factor in his behavior?”
Please distinguish between where race is mentioned and where race is mentioned as cause for his behavior. I’d love to see the results.
As has been said, when you talk about Chris Rock, race is going to be mentioned. It is a central theme to his comedy to the point that even the title of his stand up uses race, “Bigger and Blacker.”
Report Post »Locked
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 12:05pm@Hayabusa
“Please do the work.
Please distinguish between where race is mentioned and where race is mentioned as cause for his behavior. I’d love to see the results.”
As you wish!
@13th imam: “Well, just like Chuckie B and Magic J say, he’s Black. Black, I tell ya.”
@JAMACAMECRAZYMAN “Step on a black – break your mothers back…”
@bobthemoron “Racist black liberal idiot.”
@speckledpup “if black ‘stars’ were in a movie like that and liked to run themselves down like that, there is a very serious problem in that community.”
@barber2 “Today’s blacks are just the products of 60 years of the social justice philosophy of religion.”
@Petev1717 “Tipical Black A!! Hole”
@Nemo13 “Yes yes, protect the blacks silly people…”
@Paleoman “Generally speaking all blacks think white folks are racist.”
@Strat-M16 “Oh, of course we are ALL racists that post here … including you progressives … y’all keep dat black man down, witcho EBTcards, ‘n such. Mmm hmm.”
Not a single one of these comments reference Chris Rock’s work (several others made disparaging racial remarks that could also refer to Rock’s own comedy shows). Nor do they talk about the actual focus of the article: liberal hypocrisy. They judge him or refer to him based upon his race.
Report Post »Obama Nation
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 12:05pmChris Rock is a racist, against his own people.
Want proof?
It’s all in this video….
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzFTLKWvfE0&feature=player_embedded#!
Report Post »pbrenda51
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 12:09pmYou need to get out of mamas basement and soon……you are delusional!!!!
Report Post »bobball
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 12:28pmWow way to line up the straw men, you should take a critical thinking class or two. Let me knock a couple down for you. Yes he ambushed him, and I think it was unfair to Chris but it does not excuse his response. I won‘t call Chris a communist or whatever you said because I don’t know his views on the matter but if he votes for Barry because he is black…that is the definition of racist. Having seen his comedy shows more than once, I’d say that is exactly what he is. He is an Al Sharpton of the comedy world, he makes money making fun of people because of their race, including his own.
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 12:52pmLocked
Report Post »As usual, you are the arbiter of who is racist. Your list is lame. You know nothing about the people you cite. You know nothing about me. And all I did was ask which ONE is the Racist?
Rustnoggin is the dope who said there was ONE . You perhaps???
Alucard
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 12:56pmSo we have to put up with everything that comes out of their mouth and never question it because we are constantly told they‘re a comedian so it’s ok, then we are told that it’s ok for people like Palin to be smeared and ambushed because she is a public figure and put herself out there. Now you are telling us that a public figure can‘t be asked questions that aren’t prewritten for them? I’m sick of the hypocrisy and the double standard, I‘m sick of liberals saying its ok to say anything he wants because he’s a comedian yet turn around and call foul when it isn’t the message they agree with. If you can dish it out you damn well better be able to handle a little getting back because conservatives are no longer just sitting back and taking it.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 1:02pm@13th imam
“As usual, you are the arbiter of who is racist. Your list is lame. You know nothing about the people you cite. You know nothing about me.”
Nice comeback, buddy. My list of comments made solely about Rock’s race is “lame.” With a defense like that, how could you go wrong?
As for the known racists, Spankdamonkey is the one who first comes to mind. He’s openly admitted as such, although after people started pointed it out he tried to backtrack and say “Ha ha guys, it was a joke! … guys? Where are you going?” The other would be RangerP, who insists races should be separated and that interracial marriage is morally wrong.
You’re quickly working your way up there, as even here you admit you don’t like “some” blacks. I’m sure you have your reasons; but again, they’re based on assumptions you make based on race. That’s… the definition of racism.
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 1:50pmThanks locked. For setting me straight about people I don’t like. If they just happen to have high concentrations of melanin, they are immune from not being liked. Just where did you get your Certificate of Racist Labeling from? And Lame was being nice. Lovey said that Chris and every Bro has to have Barry’s Back, because he has high melanin concentrations. This is sooooooooo easy.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 2:03pm@13th imam
“Just where did you get your Certificate of Racist Labeling from? ”
Common sense? The actual definition? Your own words, that divide up people based on the idea that because they are of a specific race, they hold certain non-genetic characteristics?
This is fun. Are you actually Spankdamonkey? He started saying the same thing, “How come you get to judge what’s racist?” before trying to turn it into a joke. See, the problem is two-fold: first, there are common definitions for racist remarks (namely, judging people based on their race); and second, your own words live on in infamy here on The Blaze (unless, of course, if the moderators delete them).
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 2:23pmACertificate of Common Sense, has been issued to Locked. to go along with his Certificate of Racist Labeling. Saul would be proud.
But I NEVER see you stand for ANYTHING. NOTHING. If you don’t stand for Conservative Values, you must stand with Barry and the DEMOCRAT’s Values.
Report Post »Michael61
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 2:28pmLet’s set the record straight about “Racism”.
There is a scientific observation that the 3 most important characteristics most often used in brief descriptions of individuals are RACE (nationality), SEX, and AGE.
“Racism” used to be a scientific term (rather neutral) different from “Racial discrimination” (which is definitely bad).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism
Biologists John Tooby and Leda Cosmides were puzzled by the fact that race is one of the three characteristics most often used in brief descriptions of individuals (the others are age and sex). They reasoned that natural selection would not have favoured the evolution of an instinct for using race as a classification, because for most of human history, humans almost never encountered members of other races. Tooby and Cosmides hypothesized that modern people use race as a proxy (rough-and-ready indicator) for coalition membership, since a better-than-random guess about “which side” another person is on will be helpful if one does not actually know in advance.
Report Post »Hayabusa
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 2:32pmAgain, Locked. I requested that you “Please distinguish between where race is mentioned and where race is mentioned as cause for his behavior. I’d love to see the results.”
One would be a list of race being mentioned and the second would be a list of people attributing race to the behavior Chris Rock displayed.
Not to make excuses for some of the idiots here, but some of the comments in this thread are sarcasm and others are references to Chris’ own work such as the person who now considers Chris a n* versus just being black. That specific comment seems to be right out of “Bigger and Blacker.”
Report Post »Michael61
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 2:32pmTo continue: The difference between “Racism” (rather neutral) and “Racial discrimination” (definitely bad).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism
Some research suggests that ethnocentric thinking may have actually contributed to the development of cooperation. Political scientists Ross Hammond and Robert Axelrod created a computer simulation wherein virtual individuals were randomly assigned one of a variety of skin colors, and then one of a variety of trading strategies: be color-blind, favor those of your own color, or favor those of other colors. They found that the ethnocentric individuals clustered together, then grew until all the non-ethnocentric individuals were wiped out.[71]
In The Selfish Gene, evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins writes that “Blood-feuds and inter-clan warfare are easily interpretable in terms of Hamilton’s genetic theory.” Dawkins writes that racial prejudice, while not evolutionarily adaptive, “could be interpreted as an irrational generalization of a kin-selected tendency to identify with individuals physically resembling oneself, and to be nasty to individuals different in appearance”.[72] Simulation-based experiments in evolutionary game theory have attempted to provide an explanation for the selection of ethnocentric-strategy phenotypes.[73]
Report Post »Locked
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 2:36pm@13th imam
“But I NEVER see you stand for ANYTHING. NOTHING. If you don’t stand for Conservative Values…”
Then you’re obviously not looking. I’ve been vocal in denouncing liberals and Obama (heck, even in this article; do a search for my name).
-I’m for fiscal conservatism, pointing out corruption and calling out liars, and keeping government out of our lives. Morally,
-I’m a Christian, though people would probably call me moderate because I don’t believe in paint-brushing all non-Christians as terrible, immoral people; rather, I let the teachings of Chris shape my life, actions, and outlook without forcing my views on others… though I love to strike up a good religious conversation if another party is willing.
-Politically, independent who’s voted for the GOP in every election except 2004 (I disagreed with the war in Iraq then, as I still do today. It was enough of a reason for me to not support Bush’s second term; I simply didn’t vote at all).
And I use The Blaze because it provides good breaking news, as well as some opinions you won’t find anywhere in the MSM. I use the comments because I don’t like people posting bigoted or incorrect “facts” and not getting called on it.
Hence why I call out people like you :-)
Report Post »Locked
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 2:43pm@Hayabusa
“Not to make excuses for some of the idiots here, but some of the comments in this thread are sarcasm and others are references to Chris’ own work such as the person who now considers Chris a n* versus just being black. That specific comment seems to be right out of “Bigger and Blacker.””
True. But if you look at my list, I specifically ignored those examples. The ones I included were ONLY the examples that labeled Rock by his race, or made reference to this just being “how blacks behave.”
As you yourself just said, there are idiots on here who most definitely just look at Rock and think, before any other criticism, “Oh, he’s black, and blacks are violent.” Nothing about his politics, or quoting his work, or him being an actor. Just him being a black man.
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 2:49pmEverybody Reading This??
Locked is a CONSERVATIVE. And his Certificate of Racial Labeling and his Certificate of Common Sense, say to him that anyone who doesn’t believe JUST like He does , is a Racist with No Common Sense. Locked is a CONSERVATIVE. And if you are melanin challenged you are a Racist. EXCEPT LOCKED, the CONSERVATIVE
Report Post »Locked
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 2:56pm@13th imam
Again, a wonderful defense. Might I offer some other pointers?
A) Saying it was just a joke when you said you hate “some” blacks, and your quip about Rock’s behavior being “because he’s black”?
B) Quoting Bible passages where you imply that interracial marriage is immoral
It’s what others have done so I figure you might want to get on board. I‘m not sure why you’re trying to deflect so vehemently; guilty conscience?
Tell me, 13th… why do you think judging someone’s behavior based solely upon their color is ok? I’m honestly curious as to your reasoning here. You said I don’t know you, so please tell us what makes you tick (or ticked off, as the case may be).
Report Post »Michael61
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 3:03pmConclusion:
Some dose of racism (nationalism, xenophobia) is normal, natural, and healthy. According to mathematical and computer modeling, it is absolutely necessary for survival of any group.
The exact analog is the immune system which identifies cells different from your own cells and attacks them. No organism can survive without the immune system. No group can survive without the prejudice against others (racism, nationalism, xenophobia, whatever pejorative name you call it).
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 3:07pmA. I never said this. you are lying. DEMOSPEAK
B. I seldom speak about Religion. Again you lie. DEMOSPEAK
C. Projection
D Never
You are some kind of CONSERVATIVE. And a Christian?? You are a LIAR
Report Post »Locked
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 3:19pm@Michael
“Some dose of racism (nationalism, xenophobia) is normal, natural, and healthy. According to mathematical and computer modeling, it is absolutely necessary for survival of any group.”
I’ll take a different view on this. I agree that prejudice and stereotyping are normal and common to the point of being subconsciously inherent after our first several months of life. However, that does not make them healthy nor necessary for the survival of humanity. The argument you are making is entirely based on nature, and has nothing to do with learning, experience, or the environment. Homosexuality, rape, and infanticide are found naturally in many species, but few on this site would argue that (on the whole) they are healthy and necessary for humanity’s survival.
Perhaps when we were living as separate tribes fighting over scarce resources and every interaction with another tribe meant conflict… sure. But (at least in places of abundance, like here in America), these inclinations are rightly viewed as holding us back. It makes sense to cross the street when you see a bunch of rough-looking shady characters in front of you. But as educated people, most of the West has tried their best to move beyond “Oh, he’s black. He‘s probably a thug who can’t control his violence.”
This is likely preaching to the choir, of course. Point is, having natural prejudices is no excuse to paint-brush an entire race as some here have done.
Report Post »Michael61
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 3:24pm@Locked. Hey, I gave you a bunch of science explaining:
1. Why it is absolutely OK to attribute behavior to the existence or absense of melanine in somebody’s skin (or to other superficial characteristics), and why everybody does it. Race / nationality is a proxy for coalition membership.
2. Why some dose of prejudice against others is normal, natural, and healthy for any group. It assures the survival of such group.
Where is your reaction?
Report Post »Locked
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 3:25pm@13th
“A. I never said this. you are lying. DEMOSPEAK”
13TH IMAM
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:34am
“he’s Black. Black, I tell ya.”
“imam- you have made it clear many times you don’t like blacks
13TH IMAM
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:55am
Some. But mostly I hate the TAKER DEMOCRATS”
… remember when I said the second point is that The Blaze keeps your words forever, in infamy? Nice try. Your words are here for all to see.
B. I seldom speak about Religion. Again you lie. DEMOSPEAK
“And a Christian??”
Less than three sentences later… again, I’m using it as an example of what others have done when confronted.
C. Projection
There was no C.
D Never
Report Post »There is no D either. Ok, I offered you a chance to explain your comments, but you don’t want to. Or can’t. I’m still quite curious, but it seems my curiosity won’t be satisfied… ah, first world problems. Have a good day :-)
Michael61
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 3:43pm@Locked. Yes, this was preaching to the choir. You are absolutely correct, but…
Prejudice against others who look, dress or behave differently is a normal and natural ANIMAL SUBCONSCIOUS behavior. Yes, violence, cannibalism, adultery, homosexualism, incest, et cetera, are also normal and natural ANIMAL behaviors. Yes, it doesn’t make them desirable in human society.
However, prejudice is still necessary for the survival of the humankind as a whole.
I am not talking about racial prejudice (which is the deepest animal instinct and probably is not needed anymore). When I walk on Wall street and see a black man wearing Rolex, expensive clothes and shiny shoes, his race doesn’t make any difference, so I don’t even recognize it.
When I walk in Harlem and see a bunch of black teenagers wearing buggy pants and gold chains, I am very very afraid. I am not afraid when I see a bunch of Chinese or Indian or whatever teenagers, so race does matter as one of PROXY characteritics for quick recognition of dangers.
Anyway, I am talking about prejudice to non-members of your group (which could be Macintosh or Linux users, Vegans, Jazz lovers, or whatever). Any group will not survive if it allows equal access to people who DO NOT SHARE your values.
For instance, Boy Scouts will disappear if they allow homosexual leaders. Catholic church will disappear if they allow atheists to be bishops. Women organization will disappear if it allows men to be members.
See my point no
Report Post »Locked
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 4:08pm@Michael
“Any group will not survive if it allows equal access to people who DO NOT SHARE your values.
For instance, Boy Scouts will disappear if they allow homosexual leaders. Catholic church will disappear if they allow atheists to be bishops. Women organization will disappear if it allows men to be members.”
I feel like you’ve gone from your quoted material (on racial prejudice, which as you say, is natural and inherent) and have expanded it to sociology and chosen characteristics (religious faith). See, for example, that your example with a black business man and a black thug. You’re not judging them on being black, but on other features. That’s not racism. You just said you don’t care about their color: you care about their presentation. It was their choices, not their inherent color, that caused your reaction.
That‘s not been the case in the examples I’ve quoted here. I didn’t choose examples of people who condemned Chris Rock for being liberal, rude, or hypocritical. I chose examples who singled out him for being black. It was a race-based focus, not based on his choices or ideology.
“However, prejudice is still necessary for the survival of the humankind as a whole.”
When it comes solely to race, I disagree; if it comes to alterable concepts like culture, religion, or values, I agree. But as the discussion and all of your provided information has been on race, I‘m not sure why you’re stating this point.
Report Post »Michael61
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 4:08pmI am an atheist, btw, so I am prohibited from being a Boy Scout leader. Oh, well…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boy_Scouts_of_America_membership_controversies
The Boy Scouts of America (BSA), one of the largest private youth organizations in the United States, has policies which prohibit atheists and agnostics from membership in its Scouting program, and prohibit “avowed” homosexual people from leadership roles in its Scouting program as directly violating its fundamental principles and tenets. BSA has denied or revoked membership status or leadership positions of youths and adults for violation of these foundational principles.
The BSA contends that these policies are essential in its mission to instill in young people the values of the Scout Oath and Law.[1][2]
The organization’s legal right to have these policies has been upheld repeatedly by both state and federal courts. In Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, the Supreme Court of the United States has affirmed that as a private organization, the BSA can set its own membership standards. The BSA’s policies have been legally challenged but have not been found to constitute illegal discrimination; as a private organization in the United States the BSA has the right to freedom of association,[3] as determined in Boy Scouts of America v. Dale.[4] In recent years, the policy disputes have led to litigation over the terms under which the BSA can access governmental resources including public lands.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 4:11pmThat‘s the way DAS KAPITAL QUOTIN’, CHRISTIAN FEARIN’, LEFTY…scrub, clean, sanitize..good dog.
Report Post »Michael61
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 4:28pm@Locked.
Race is one of the major proxy characteristics. You said it yourself: “Black businessman”, “Black teenagers in baggy pants”. Omit the word “black”, and you will lose most of the meaning.
“White teenagers in baggy pants” or “Chinese teenagers in baggy pants” are completely different cathegories (they just mimic clothes and behavior, but not as dangerous).
When I see a “Black businessman”, I know what to expect. “Chinese businessman” or “Russian businessman” are completely different (I am from Russia, btw, so I know).
Btw, I have an utmost respect to a black businessman working on Wall street. It probably took a lot of character to overcome the peer pressure, to get education, and to become successful.
Take Herman Cain for instance. If you missed it, every redneck in the south wanted him to become the selected Presidential candidate. 1000s of typical rednecks were driving around in Georgia and Tennessee in pickup trucks with the confederate flag in one window and the portrait of Herman Cain in another. 1000s of rednecks were volunteers for him in the South.
Who are real racists? Democrats who instill in blacks feelings of inferiority and victimhood, or Conservatives who want those blacks to stand up, get education, become successful, and join the rest of Americans???
Report Post »Locked
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 4:49pm@Michael
“Race is one of the major proxy characteristics. You said it yourself: “Black businessman”, “Black teenagers in baggy pants”. Omit the word “black”, and you will lose most of the meaning.”
Ah, I misunderstood. I used “black” in this case simply because you did. If I see baggy pants, smoking, with tattoos and bandanas, I think “Trouble” whether the race is white, brown, or black. I thought you were saying the same thing.
I guess I’ll disagree then. I’m obviously not “color blind” (in the Maniac Magee sense of the term), but I don’t think “Ah! Black thug!”; I think “Ah! Thug!” I guess it’s different for different people; my point was it’s not the race that makes me go “Ah!”, it’s the actions and portrayal. It’s the difference between saying “Chris Rock is black; of course he’s violent“ and saying ”Chris Rock is a thug; of course he’s violent.”
Report Post »Michael61
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 5:09pm@Locked. The discussion started with this:
“Oh boy, another “black man attacks” video”
“But i am sure you will all call Chris Rock a racist, socialist marxist and say he hates white people. Spooky black man videos”
Oh, well, unfortunately, since even before Barack Obama become the Presidential candidate, there have been a lot of “black attacks”… Remember black snipers in Washington? “Let’s paint White House black”? Black Panthers intimidating white voters? Black teenagers putting a white guy on fire? Black teenagers throwing shopping carts on people? Black teenager flash mobs robbing groceries and pharmacies and shoe stores and …? Black teenagers attacking whites at county fairs and throwing people out of windows?
Black-on-White crime is 100 times up recently, and Black-on-White crime is 1000×1 comparing to White-on-Black crime, unfortunately. At least this is the perception, since nobody would publish real statistics.
Btw, last time it caused the creation of KKK to protect whites against freed black slaves (“It” means the perception of a Black-on-White crime wave caused by emancipation). Whatever. Spin it as you wish. You know I am not a rabid racist by any stretch of imagination.
Report Post »marcus_arealius
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 7:02pmWell us YTs are on this earth to aggravate blacks and steal all their inventions, architecture and take credit for all their intellectual literature. Yeah, I’m using some of that stuff right now in order to write these words.. Thank you black culture for teaching me to think before I act (react).
Report Post »Patriot Z
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:23pmok apparently you never seen rock in videros have you. take his entire routine and you tell me that if it was reversed you would cry racism. next why cant you libs answe simple questions? you want tpo call us racists but when asked to clarify or explaine yourself you cant. people like you and godfather have no clue what the heck you are talking about and are cowards. dont be mad at us because you are racist and feel the need to project your racist views on innocent people. if you dont like us, then quit talking about us. but face it homey we own you, and without us you couldnt survive
Report Post »Locked
Posted on March 15, 2012 at 10:51pm@Michael
“Btw, last time it caused the creation of KKK to protect whites against freed black slaves”
Whoa.
Dang. Here I was, thinking we were having a nice, civilized discussion, and then you throw out something like that?
No, Michael. The KKK used its power to intimidate and persecute black Americans. The fact that you have the audacity to say “Oh, the KKK protects whites against blacks”… well, it boggles the mind. You want to protect yourself against riotous black Americans? Get a gun, and shoot them on your property if they come to steal your stuff.
Just so you know Michael, there have been three KKKs to date (four, if you count the neo-Nazi KKK of today). The first was Confederates in the 1860s, opposing Reconstruction. The second were ultra-nationalist whites in the 1920s. The third was anti-segregationists in the 1960s, who routinely murdered and attacked blacks.
Today, the Klan is considered a terrorist group.
So, which do you align with? As only one of these is still around…
Report Post »barber2
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:56amToday’s blacks are just the products of 60 years of the social justice philosophy of religion. Ironically, it is based on “revenge” which is wrapped in the false term of ” justice.“ Same thing does for their term ” re-distribution“ which is just another PC word for the old concept of ”stealing.” Any wonder why there is so much anger in our society today ? And this phony “ social justice” concept has been taught in supposedly CHRISTIAN churches. They have hijacked Christian forgiveness .
Report Post »SoCalSE
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:29amSpot on.
Report Post »heyjim55
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:44amThis is correct there is a get even attitude among blacks when given the chance, Liberals seem to want them to get even by screaming racism every chance they get funny part is that they think they will not be attacked by blacks is they do try to get even.
Report Post »girlnurse
Posted on March 15, 2012 at 3:10pmAll so called “stars” are subject to this and I sure am not going to feel sorry for them! Its part of the pact they signed with the devil. They have no special skills that millions of Americans don’t have! I am always amazed at the level of talent ALL across America when I watch American Idol! The only difference is they haven’t got a break from the leftist controllers! I agree with the guy who said the left is definately building a Class warfare society!! I mean wasn’t George Loony just having dinner with Obummer?? Bill Mahr gave him a million bucks, Michelle Obummer was on David Letterman last night….But guess what? These people are so stupid they don’t even realize they are usefull idiots who will be the first to go in “the new society”…I can’t wait to see Letterman and his buddies out on the street! Ha!
Report Post »Rob
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:53amChris Rock is allowed to hit people…after all he is a comedian!
Report Post »dutchy
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:51amThis will be a very interesting book from Jason Mattera, I’m going to get a copy!
Report Post »lbyrd26
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:58amChris who? When they do a “where are they now” segment on him they’ll be wondering where was he then. I doubt that his acting career will ever elevate him to any one wondering where is he now.
Report Post »Pucci
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:53amI thought chris rock had died.
Report Post »Caniac Steve
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:51amWhere’s the love Chris Rock?? Where’s there the love ?
Report Post »COFemale
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:50amI don’t condone Chris Rocks response, but I do understand his reaction. Mattera should have not used a ruse to get Chris’s attention and then barraged him with the question. He approached Chris Rock under false pretenses. We would not like it if Democrats did this, so why should we tolerate it from a Republican Conservative. If you can’t be upfront in your approach, then you should not be there.
Report Post »TerryDo
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:59amOne question throws Rock into a rage and it was not a foreign question it was about something which he spoke out about and his beliefs; fancy that, poor baby Rock can spew out cr@p but can’t defend his own rants.
Report Post »Hayabusa
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:01amIf someone came up to me under false pretenses then unemotionally questioned me about something I said without misconstruing it, I’d have ZERO inclination to react violently or hysterically.
Chris’ problem is he was only willing to make his statement in a protected forum where he would get no push back or challenges. When put on camera and challenged, he got angry because he knows his position is completely unsubstantiated. I would go even further to say that it’s not so much his view that was expressed but most probably something he was coached to say in the interview.
Report Post »Madison2012
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:23amChris Rock is a coward. Who cares how he is approached. I wouldn’t care if they did that to a conservative, libertarian, animal, etc. Hold people accountable for their words and actions. Chris Rock just shown himself to be a coward and not defend or apologize for his words.
Report Post »Volsense
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:25amCofemale, what planet do you live on? Liberal bigots ambush conservatives daily. MSNBC (Mentally Sick National Bigotry Corporation) is dedicated to continous lies and deceptions towards conservatives 24 hours a day. If you were just being sarcastic, you would make more sense.
Report Post »Bible Quotin' Science Fearin' Conservative American
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:28amPile of crap. I didn’t see any kind of RAGE from Chris Rock and he did attempt to just walk away and was followed.
Fear of black people is rampant here in the Tea drinker community.
Report Post »2theADDLED
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 1:22pm@ Bible Quotin‘ Science Fearin’ Conservative American
Report Post »I believe you are wrong blacks are not feared it is just some people have not learned you cannot be rational with the irrational close minded people who refuse to admit that they are responsible for who they are and what they made of themselves. Paranoia sets in and manifest it’s self into constant paranoia until it becomes obsession at which time they become deniers and will never seek professional help with their mental diseases.
JJ Coolay
Posted on March 15, 2012 at 3:37amBible quote.. you are so full of crap.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:50amI’d prefer to see the unedited tape with the audio included. Mattera gets results, but usually gets them by saying ridiculously over-the-top comments and catching his prey off-guard. I‘m curious why he doesn’t include all his words this time.
Report Post »sjohn70037
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:49amLike Whoopie, you’ll never see this creep doing his stand-up routine without using the phrase “You White people” or “crackers”. Noting but a racist thug.
Report Post »Eric_The_Red_State
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:49amThe LEFT has no footing – - – no basis in truth. All they can do is point fingers and be sarcastic.
That is one sign that we are winning.
The TRUTH is hard for LIBERALS. That’s why they try so hard to divert you from it.
- ie: Rush Limbaugh
- ie: “War on women”
- ie: Contraceptive issue
- ie: everything else that comes out of their mouths
GOOD JOB JASON!!
Report Post »HairRazor
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:49amwas it something he said? ..or, he knows he’s wrong and he screwed up (having overwhelming guilt) for voting for and smoochfesting with obama.. maybe that’s it..
Report Post »Secret Squirrel
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:48am.
Report Post »You can take the boy out of the “hood,”
but you can’t tale the “hood” out of the boy.
scuba13
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:01amDoes Chris Rock look like a meth addict or do meth addicts look just like Chris Rock?
Report Post »Listen_then_think
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:47amChris rock has always been racist and disgusting as maher is. Rock has never been funny nor has Maher. I have never watched anything with them in it. That is my way of not supporting these liberal losers or their ratings.
Report Post »Ruler4You
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:53amOne more piece of evidence that the “good guys always finish last” philosophy “IS” the hollywood oath of success. What a POS.
Report Post »TEIN
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:47amChris Rock….the modern day Arsenio Hall…
Report Post »Iswingright
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:46amFirst, Chris Rock is the most overrated “comedian” (and maybe the worst actor I’ve ever seen) of our day.
Report Post »Second, have you ever actually watched/listened to his act? You talk about a racist. This guy is as bad as Paul Mooney (another non-funny “comedian”). Nearly everything they talk about is race-related. And it ALWAYS portrays whites in bad light.
Third, the reason he doesn’t want to address his comments, is because he has NOTHING, in terms of facts, to back them up with.
Locked
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:52am“Nearly everything they talk about is race-related. And it ALWAYS portrays whites in bad light.”
Have you seen Chris Rock? He definitely uses race as a topic, but he picks on all sides. I remember one skit where he’s talking about how black women get upset when they see successful black men with white girlfriends. Says something like, “Hey, hands off our good men! White people have plenty of good guys; we only have six!”
Made me crack up, at least.
Report Post »Iswingright
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:30amYes, I’ve seen Chris Rock — several times. Okay, so once in a blue Paul Mooney he pokes fun at blacks. That doesn’t change the fact that he blasts whites all the time. Oh, and that he, generally speaking, sucks.
Report Post »Tri-ox
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:46amChris Rock is a typical, violent obamaslut.
Report Post »SpeckledPup
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:44amwe recently (barely) sat thru some 1990s? black-stars movie on starz called ‘something’s wrong in south central’ or something like that, and all we could think of is, if black ‘stars’ were in a movie like that and liked to run themselves down like that, there is a very serious problem in that community.
Report Post »BobtheMoron
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:44amRacist black liberal idiot.
Report Post »mike_trivisonno
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:42amI wonder what mosque Chris Rock attends.
Report Post »ChiefGeorge
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:49amThe anger on the Left is what they fear will come upon them from the Right if the Right ever became a majority in this country…..so since they are the majority for now, they reserve the right to kick your butt when you question their words and deeds. Makes total sense now….there is no such thing as equality, there is only majority rule with iron fist.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:59amChief: The anger on the Left is a new kind of anger. It is the anger of political zealots who have been filled with rage by their social justice political imams and their Marxist mentors. New and dangerous.
Report Post »cookcountypatriot
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:41amjason my man!…its so true…when progressives are reading thier lines from thier handlers they get thier laugh….but when they are not scripted they cant form a thought…so what do they do..ATTACK!..CHRIS ROCK is just a tool working for a paycheck…its hard out there for a pimp..lol
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:40amHe didn’t like the question so, he gets vilolent. I love it when the leftists show their true colors.
Report Post »USACommoner
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:50amIt’s a good sign of being uneducated. Without possessing the proper communication skills (and others), it’s all they have and a good many of them use it quite often. You see it a lot in fast food joints, where, incidentally, michelle tells them not to go.
Report Post »Your Name Here
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:53amTHAT is what the left means when they say “It’s always about color!”
Report Post »Not the color of the skin, but the cloor of their character.
Sounds like the movie “Pitch Black”, their character is as black as the bottom of the pitch lake.
Gonzo
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:20amCome on Steelhead, I used the word “colors” in my post and you didn’t jump on me, I’m hurt.
Report Post »JAMACAMECRAZYMAN
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:40amStep on a black – break your mothers back…………..
Report Post »hauschild
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:36amTypical, classy leftist thug.
Report Post »biohazard23
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:34amEverybody Hates Chris?
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:34amWell, just like Chuckie B and Magic J say, he’s Black. Black, I tell ya.
Report Post »Steelhead
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:46ammam- you have made it clear many times you don’t like blacks
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:55amSome, But mostly I hate the TAKER DEMOCRATS . For turning this country into a cesspool, where living off of others hard work has become a pastime. You are a prime example. You advocate for stealing from some , and handing it to others.
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on March 15, 2012 at 3:42amDrago.. spot on.
Report Post »There is a difference and there are too many people with their head in the sand to accept that as truth.
There are plenty of very cool black people and there are plenty of n—–s.