Health

Why Does a Process That ‘Cooks’ Cancer Cells Have Glenn Beck So Excited?

Several years ago while receiving a round of chemotherapy treatment for a rare form of cancer, John Kanzius, who knew the side effects of cancer treatment all too well, was moved when he visited the ward of the hospital with children who had the disease and thought “there has to be a better way.” This thought has led to a groundbreaking area of cancer treatment research from a man with no background in medicine or science, and, if you can believe it, started with a test using pie tins and hotdogs.

The Kanzius Cancer Research Foundation is currently helping conduct medical research in an effort to find a better way to treat cancer without the harmful side effects associated with current treatment. It is so groundbreaking, that it even caught the eye of Glenn Beck, who co-sponsored an event for the foundation Thursday evening at his offices in New York City.

Although Kanzius didn’t survive his own battle to see his idea treat patients with cancer, his novel technique using radiowaves to “cook cancer” is still being researched, and experts say in a best case scenario it could reach human trials within three years.

Beck hosted Kanzius’ wife, Marianne, on GBTV last night to explain the idea:

Kanzius Cancer Treatment With No Side Effects Predicted Three Years From Human Trial

Dr. Steven Curley. (Photo: KCRF)

How an idea starting with pie tins and hotdogs could lead to symptom-free cancer treatment

While finding a cure for cancer is frequently what you hear of these days and billions of federal dollars goes into researching it, treatment of the disease is still something patients have to deal with until a cure is found.

Dr. Steven Curley, a professor and lead cancer treatment researcher at University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas — an institution conducting research on Kanzius’ idea — said that while the research to find a cure and learn more about what causes cancer and its behavior is important, improving treatment for cancer patients is just as vital.

“The sad reality is [...] a number of people still die of cancer each year,” Curley said. “We are trying to come up with things that have the ability to treat cancer now.”

Curley said he first met a Kanzius at the request of a colleague. Kanzius, who was being treated for a rare form of B-cell leukemia at M.D. Anderson and knew the harsh side-effects of chemotherapy all too well, had an idea he couldn’t leave unresearched, unfulfilled.

“[My colleague said] there’s this patient driving me crazy about an idea he had,” Curley said. “Will you please talk to him.”

Curley met with Kanzius about his idea which involved using radiowaves to heat and kill cancer cells. The idea came to Kanzius one night while unable to sleep. In a eureka moment, Kanzius, who had a background in electronics and broadcast engineering, took out some radio transmitter parts, his wife’s pie tins and connected metal probes to a few hotdogs. Exposing the hotdogs to a radiowave field, Kanzius found the parts of the hotdog touching metal got hot while those not touching metal stayed cold.

As Kanzius explained the idea of using radiowaves to treat cancer cells, while leaving healthy cells unharmed in an effort to create a side-effect-free cancer treatment, Curley said he had heard similar theories before. But, he said, no one had figured out how to focus the radiofrequency field. Curley told Kanzius to build a machine and then get back to him.

“I thought that would be the last time I’d hear from him,” Curley said. “But John didn’t take a challenge like that lightly.”

When Curley recalls Kanzius showing him the machine he created, Curley said he thought, “Holy moly, this guy is amazing.” Curley who has been doing cancer research since 1985 calls it a remarkable phenomenon.

“This man was a private individual with no scientific training, coming up with an idea that works,” Curley said, adding that he hadn’t experienced a situation like this in all his years as a scientist.

Kanzius Cancer Treatment With No Side Effects Predicted Three Years From Human Trial

John Kanzius with his machine in a laboratory setting. (Photo: Kanzius Spread the Wave video screenshot)

Unorthodox funding and pending human trials 

Kanzius Cancer Treatment With No Side Effects Predicted Three Years From Human TrialWith all this taking place in the mid-2000s, much has occurred with the research since. Kanzius helped establish the Kanzius Cancer Research Foundation in 2008, which is a non-profit funding the studies at M.D. Anderson led by Curley and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center led by Dr. David Geller. Money for the research comes through donations, as well as state and federal funding.

KCRF’s executive director Mark Neidig said that last year the foundation was awarded more than $2.4 million in federal funds and raised $2 million in donations for research. Learn more about donating and “spreading the wave“.

“Even as the media says our economy has plummeted, our donations continue to come through,” Neidig said, explaining how he gets calls daily of cancer patients and loved ones looking for a better cancer treatment.

“People are looking for an alternative,” Neidig said. “We’re so accustomed to just accepting the fact that we will kill the cancer and the healthy parts of the person while we treat them. It’s not ok. Introducing toxins into a person‘s body isn’t acceptable. We’re looking to kill the cancer cells and keep the healthy parts of the body.”

How do they do this? Neidig explained that in lab experiments and animal trials the researchers have been able to attach an antibody that fits with a protein specific to cancer cells to metallic nanoparticles. The antibody will only attach to cancer cells, “like a lock and key”. At that point, the cancer cells — not healthy cells — have a metal attached to it that when exposed to radiowaves heats up and “cooks the cell.”

Kanzius Cancer Treatment With No Side Effects Predicted Three Years From Human Trial

Gold nanoparticles have antibodies specific to cancer cell proteins attached to them. These metallic nanoparticles heat up when exposed to radiowaves, killing the cancer cell. (Photo: Kanzius Spread the Wave video screenshot)

Watch more about how the treatment works:

Curley says the greatest success of the research so far has been using this technique to treat an animal with pancreatic cancer — a type of cancer he says that is “highly lethal.” Curley said they were able to eradicate the cancer with no harmful side effects on the animal.

But both Curley and Neidig say there are still unknowns to figure out before this goes to human trial, which Curley said in a best case scenario could be within three years.

Researchers are now looking several facets of the technology: the intensity of the radio frequency  needed; duration; how many nanoparticles are needed effectively “cook” the cell; and if there are things other than antibodies, which are rather large relatively speaking, specific to cancer cells to carry the nanoparticles, while not affecting healthy cells.

In terms of design for the machine that would emit the radiowaves itself, Neidig said that ideas are still in development. He said that concepts put forth have been a standup machine, a room and a table. According to Neidig, KCRF does’t fund research on the machine, but private industry is developing the intellectual property and prototypes for it.

Curley said that the medical community has received the idea of this treatment with a lot of interest as well as an appropriate amount of skepticism.

“We hear about new treatments all the time that look promising but don’t have human data yet,” he said. “I’m the same way when I see new treatments.”

“We don‘t know if it’s going to work on humans,” Neidig said. “But, we are determined to know for sure and will fight to the end.”

The Kanzius technology was featured on 60 minutes in 2008. Watch the episode with Kanzius and the researchers in these two parts.

Part 1:

Part 2:

Look for videos and medical briefings here.

Comments (148)

  • Islander
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 12:37pm

    As long as people are dying of cancer there will be no cure. Guess why

    Report Post » Islander  
    • dejon
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 12:42pm

      because, SIN causes cancer. Period.

      Report Post » dejon  
    • Joker50
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 12:55pm

      Sin causes cancer???? Really? Where is your proof of that? And I mean HARD, UNDENIABLE, SCIENTIFIC PROOF!!!!!

      Report Post »  
    • Arlundee
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 1:02pm

      That’s a bit ridiculous, don’t you think? I’ve known some of the best people, who only gave their best, who put others before themselves, even complete strangers that have died from cancer. And you have the balls to say SIN causes cancer?

      What about children with cancer? So the 5 year old down the block suffering from leukemia sinned so bad that God decided to plague that little girl with cancer to make her pay for her wrong doings?

      You need reevaluate yourself, your values, and your outlook on life.

       
    • VoteBushIn12
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 1:59pm

      @Islander

      Oh oh I know!

      Because private corporations stand to make more money TREATING cancer than they do CURING it!

      Report Post » VoteBushIn12  
    • ZaphodsPlanet
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 2:46pm

      @DEJON You should really think about what you’re saying before you say it. So what you’re saying is 4 and 5 year old children with Leukemia are sinners? Really? I believe in God, I pray most every night before I go to bed, I try to study the bible from time to time, but I do not attend church in person, and what you’re saying is an example of why I have not gone. I do not wish to be around people who sound like you do with that statement. You sound a little bit like the Christian that yelled at the Jews in his studio, as Glenn described happening earlier this week. I did a search on the phrase, “Judge not lest ye be judged” and I found something that seems slightly more pertinent, if you really mean what you’re saying, and you’re not another OWS wacko plant posting, Matt 7:2-5 Freaking read it.

      Report Post » ZaphodsPlanet  
    • HippoNips
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 2:47pm

      Arlundee,

      Sin is not an act that you do.
      Sin is a state of being
      Sin is an archery term, which is the measured distance between the mark where your arrow hits the target and the bulleye.
      You are the mark, God is the perfect bulleye, and the distance between you and that. perfection is the sin..
      Thats’ why kiling someone who is trying to kill you is not part of sin, and killing someone for the joy of it is.
      That’s why children are born into a certain amount of sin, for they have not learned the perfection of God, —-its not because they are guilty or responsible for wrong doing.
      Iin the biological sense, a distance from physical perfection does cause illness However this doesn’t apply in the moral sense.

      Report Post »  
    • Texasnana
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 3:32pm

      I am a cancer survivor, 13 years. I have learned that everyone has cancer cells in their body. A person’s body tries to kill those cells, your immune system. But there come‘s a point where the immune system can’t do it. We are all exposed to many things that can cause cancer. The air we breath, chemicals, etc., etc., etc. I recently read an article from Israel21 where they too have found a possible cure for cancer. It is a vaccine which in some way boost the immune system to destroy the cancer cells. I have been reading and researching things about cancer for sometime. There are certain nutrients our body needs, each tiny cell has to have it. One of those things is called “glutathione” Research it for yourself. You will be amazed. It is the number one antioxident, immune builder, and detoxifier in your body. You can’t take glutathione, but you can take the precursors that helps your body produce glutathione. The less glutathione your body has, the more degenerative type disease you get. If you cook food, it kills the glutathione in it. I could go on and on about it. Cancer is not caused by sin, it is a disease. Adam lived to be over 900 years old. He was sinner. The more raw food you eat, the more your body produces gluathione. Most our diets today do not consist of raw foods, like milk, grains, vegetables, etc. Milk is pasturaized they have to add the nutrients to it after they kill them. Prayer is a major source for healing, I know.

      Report Post »  
    • jblaze
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 7:18pm

      First before I address the sin part, I have to say that this simple and inexpensive system if really a cure or even close to being a cure will be of great significance to humankind and, it will send the FDA and the Cancer Society out of orbit! Cancer is big money to them! To back up that statement read any one of Kevin Trudeau’s books, who blew both those entities out of the water and exposed them for who they really are! 
      Now for the sin part! First you need to know what sin is, and to show you this we need only go to God’s Word, the Bible, the only source on the planet that can tell you what sin is. Turn to 1John 3:4 ”Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law”. That is about as clear as you can say it. So then what is the law? Why it is the 10 commandments and the laws and statutes God has established which one can break physically and/or spiritually! 
      You could say that yes, some people do get cancer by breaking the gluttony law, while others may have been poisoned through the food chain, but sinned by not praying in thanksgiving over their food and asking for the removal of all impurities! Either way, all disease comes by way of sin either by self or others!

      Report Post » jblaze  
    • Jack007
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:31pm

      This is what happens when you spend too much time sitting on the toilet

      Report Post » Jack007  
    • endgamer
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:31pm

      My mother was at MD Anderson on a clinical trial. All they care about is Big pharma and huge profits and ripping off the public. I knew about MD Anderson and John Kanzuis radio wave machine in 2007-08 the radio waves ALSO release hydrogen from salt water and the water actually burns while in the radio waves. As long as we have the current big pharma progressives in office.. Curing ANYTHING will never happen. You will only have “treatment” that prolongs your life for awhile. My mothers cancer treatments were 27,000 every three weeks. Without a cure for bronchio alveolar carcinoma This will be her last Christmas.

      Report Post » endgamer  
    • Jack007
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:33pm

      @Dejon
      OMG, how do these folks manage to crawl out from under the rocks!

      Report Post » Jack007  
    • ireport uderide
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 11:12pm

      Dejon
      Actually, sin causes death. Sickness is just a side a precursor.

      Report Post » ireport uderide  
    • Favored93
      Posted on December 10, 2011 at 12:45am

      @Arlundee
      Sin does cause cancer…. Not NECESSARILY your personal sin but sin.
      Sin is what brought death to the world so the original post is right… Sin is the cause of ALL illness and disease.
      This does not mean that a 5 year old little girl has brought this on herself but that the sin and death that came through Adam has found its way to her and not just her but ALL of us die of something sometime.
      The good news is that because Jesus took the stripes and endured the cross and was raised from the dead … Death has lost its sting and victory! We have the opportunity to see eternal life through HIM!!!
      SIN IS THE CAUSE OF DEATH IN ALL IT’S FORMS!
      JESUS IS THE AUTHOR OF LIFE AND THAT IS GOOD NEWS
      AND OUR ONLY SOURCE OF HOPE!!!!
      …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
      How cool is this story though?! My mother in law died this past year of cancer. She was a born again Christian and it would have been wonderful to see her beat it with this machine or a miracle from the Lord. But honestly I would rather be with Him then here so we are glad she is there….does that make sense? This is an exciting story I hope The Blaze follows it.

      Report Post » Favored93  
    • RossPoldark
      Posted on December 10, 2011 at 6:06am

      Fascinating concept. I wonder if medical science might be able to us this method to target and destroy protein plaques that invade the brain in Alzheimers disease.

      Report Post »  
    • memoriesman
      Posted on December 10, 2011 at 8:39am

      This is a great break. The sad part of this is that the Phama companies will not be happy. This is a huge cancer economy not sure if they want this to work. But, that being said this applies concepts that has been applied but takes them to a new level.

      Report Post » memoriesman  
    • Jezreel
      Posted on December 10, 2011 at 9:59am

      What Islander means is because “sin” entered the world, so did death. We do die because of sin, whether we die of old age or illness.
      I believe that they already have a cure for cancer but don’t want it to be used because there is more profit out of cancer treatments.

      Report Post »  
  • hogtrashhd
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 11:54am

    another story is over at pjmedia about a 17 year old girl who has come up with something to get rid of cancer too.. now it’s time for the other cancer “researchers” to grab hold of these cures and stuff it where the sun don’t shine.. they don’t WANT a cure for cancer.. there is waaaay too much money in that disease.. all these charities are worthless.. when was the last time you heard of a cure for ANY disease?? try not since the polio vaccine.. they learned from that one that there’s more money in keeping the disease than curing it.. there charities are paper pushing, feel good pretense crap.. come on people start demanding you get something for you money.. demand cures.. not more feel good frigging marathon races…

    Report Post »  
    • psadie
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 12:26pm

      You are correct. There is BIG MONEY in cancer and all of the other areas affected by it. There are cures that are happening but the medical community shuns it or puts it on the back burner. They cannot ruin this moneymaker. So the patients go through chemo and radiation and suffer the devastating effects because the medical community does not want a cure.

      Report Post »  
    • hi
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 12:42pm

      I agree but the docs many not be guilty of doing it for money. The pharmaceutical companies have so much control over the standard of care. If a doc deviates, he can lose his license and be considered a quack.

      Report Post » hi  
    • poetopoet
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 12:48pm

      Sad, but true, I know Japan treats its burn victims with ionized water Ph and cures all with these baths. not here.

      Report Post » poetopoet  
    • isobamamadd
      Posted on December 10, 2011 at 3:32pm

      http://www.salem-news.com/articles/november292011/vaccines-contaminated-se.php

      Report Post »  
  • heyjim55
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 11:30am

    Sometimes in order to think outside of the box you have to be outside of the box yourself .

    Report Post »  
  • Pinkie
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 11:27am

    What an awesome, innovative and inspiring weapon against the most feared disease in the world. However,I am afraid it will come to nothing, due to the political machine. Can you imagine how many thousands maybe millions out of work? Think of the cancer research centers and the cancer hospitals put out of business. I’m sorry folks, but allowing this to become reality, giving hope and health to millions, just isn’t a good idea economically for our country. We will have to tie this up in FDA, EPA, OSHA, MSHA and any other A’s we can think of. Too bad for you. Maybe someone in China will come up with the “same idea”, then we can have it, but only at the cost of millions. (Gotta help China become economically independent.)

    Report Post »  
    • mamatango
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 8:25pm

      It IS awesome, and as usual, regular citizens are the truly inventive ones. Thank God for this man!

      One major little-known fact is that money that well-meaning people donate to to THE AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY ends up being given by them to PLANNED PARENTHOOD!!!!!!!

      I about gagged when I first read this. I had just donated to support my daughter in a walk for cancer.
      She gave up her weekend for this, got many donations, then I read that they support abortions!
      I WILL NEVER BUY ANY OF THOSE PINK ITEMS AGAIN EITHER!!!!!!!

      Liberals funding liberals. Conservatives should be know where some of their honest donations go!
      It’s SICK!

      Report Post »  
  • Creativethinker
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 11:07am

    The healthiest people on the planet eat a diet high in Omega 3′s little carbs and sugar which turns into sugar. Grass fed beef, natural caught seafood, organic chicken and turkey etc. When the doctors go to locate the cancer tumor in the body what do they use? SUGAR cancer loves and thrives on it because it is a fungus!

    Report Post »  
    • FungalWarrior
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 2:11pm

      Uh, no. Cancer is NOT a Fungus. I know a thing or two about fungi. Cancer is an overgrowth of the body’s own cells. Something goes haywire and the cells start to grow uncontrollably. Fungi grow from spore bodies, grow hyphae (roots) into the organic material, and digest it.

      This treatment is another example of the creative exceptionalism which permeates our country. Everywhere you see everyday people coming up with creative ways to solve problems and needs. That dynamism is one of the primary things socialism and communism squashes with over-regulation. It kills a country’s soul.

      Report Post » FungalWarrior  
    • ramburner
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 7:53pm

      @Fungalwarrior; I wish you really were a fungalwarrior; if you were then you would know what the real doctors of the world are discovering, that Cancer IS a fungus! It IS Candida Albican specie and it is KILLED by baking soda as discovered by an Oncology Doctor years ago in Italy. You can argue with him about it; here is some URL’s for you, and his email address. Cancer IS treatable. You do NOT have to die because of Cancer in any part of your body. If you want to live, then check out Dr. Tullio Simoncini at You Tube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nn_nMVShU3U and http://www.curenaturalicancro.com/ and http://www.curenaturalicancro.com/en/treatments-with-sodium-bicarbonate/prostate-cancer-2/2010/10/02 and in fb at http://www.facebook.com/pages/Tullio-Simoncini/40073190100 and http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dr-Tullio-Simoncini-Cancer-Is-A-Fungus-Bicarbonate-Of-Soda-Treatment/108529202546829 and http://www.curenaturalicancro.com/en/sod and http://www.cancerisafungus.com/ or Contact Tullio directly by email at: t.simoncini@alice.it

      Report Post »  
    • ramburner
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:41pm

      It is too bad that neither of these technologies will ever be brought to market; either Mr. Kanzious Radio Therapy or Dr. Simoncini Baking Soda CURE for Cancer; because of the drug company lock on the industry and the money that is made using technology that has an 18% success rate as defined by the industry. When a person lives 5 years and 1 day past therapy using chemo, or other standard treatments. After all, the New World Order dictates that only 500 million of us should survive here on earth once the Global Economy gets put in place. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cWYDWlwqWw Read the First Commandment written in Stone! Our society is bent on killing us through bad medical practice, our tainted food supply using genetically modified food seeds re: BT Corn experiment in the Philippines by Monsanto and lack of training for hospital staff. My father-in-law died of simple fibrillation in the hospital after suffering for 4 hours during a heart attack. Staff did NOT know when to apply the defibrillator. Now I DO! I have learned, NEVER rely 100% on the “experts” most likely they are NOT experts in anything except collecting their pay!

      Report Post »  
    • Coolcat51
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 10:53am

      fungalwars,

      You are just wrong. anyone can go to this website and find out the truth. http://www.knowthecause.com/
      or this one, See the Dr. that has the answer.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQuODiMlUsc

      Report Post »  
  • BravoMike
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 11:01am

    I saw this on you tube over a year ago. This radio wave process also makes salt water burn. Can you imagine how this could change the world. Not only would people be living longer, but also driving around in vehicles fueled by water. Two huge industries…It will never (be allowed to) fly.

    Report Post »  
    • SychinLegacy
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 11:49am

      No offense Bravomike but having a chemistry background I cannot leave this untouched. You can never burn salt water. Ever. Why? Well let’s take a look at a little chemistry.

      First what is “burning”? Burning is essentially an oxidation reaction. An oxidation reaction means something is gaining electrons. For example when you burn methane (CH4) the central carbon atom is gaining electrons and turning into CO2 and thus being oxidized.

      Now then, what is water. H2O. The central Oxygen atom is already hanging onto it‘s two shared electrons a lot closer than the hydrogen is since Oxygen’s nucleus has more positive charge. That means it‘s already in it’s natural -2 oxidation state and cannot be oxidized further without the use of incredible amounts of energy. And even if it could than it would quickly react with another water molecule to form peroxide HOOH or O2 to form ozone O3. Both of which are incredibly toxic and dangerous.

      Now what is salt? NaCl. Sodium chloride is the salt of an acid base recation between NaOH, sodium hydroxide, and HCl, hydrochloric acid. The salt species is a lot more stable in water than it’s strong acid and strong base species. This is why if you put salt in water it stays as salt. So you are not going to be able to oxidize the salt properly. Thus salt cannot burn. This is also why you throw salt on a fire to put it out.

      Report Post » SychinLegacy  
    • Jwes99
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 6:17pm

      Bravomike,

      Why would you make that up? Is there something to be gained by being dishonest about this? Do you work the cancer treatment industry?

      Report Post »  
    • ramburner
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:27pm

      @BravoMike; YOU are CORRECT! Just a few minutes on You Tube and we can ALL see the results of common people driving their cars on HHO. For the chemistry wizard Sychinlegacy; if you spent more time researching instead of trying to keep people in that box you are in, you also might learn that technology DOES exist to break water down safely into its two components using the car or bike battery and alternator; Two Hydrogen atoms and ONE Oxygen atom. When foreigners who make $2 a day can do it, it’s too bad YOU are SO Educated, and that you’re instructors have taught you it cannot be done! We enjoy between 20 and 100% increase in mileage. For Jwes99; I am proud to say, my car runs fine on water and so does my motorcycle! It is NOT made up. Again, spend some time on You Tube researching HHO generators. For ANYONE who does NOT believe this; you ALL stay away from my pee, my sweat, the ocean water, the lakes, rivers and ponds, the rain water, distilled water mud puddles, and ANY other source of water. Water IS my fuel, my car and motorcycle run fine on it. I am SO Relieved I no longer pay close to $4 a gallon for oil. I am doing my part for the environment by conserving that oil for ALL who don’t believe. My emissions are nearly ZERO! My carbon footprint is also nearly ZERO. The environmentalists must be happy with me! I have left the “Stupid” crowd with degrees in foolishness and those who refuse to think out of the box!

      Report Post »  
  • Lloyd Drako
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:58am

    Great news! But why is the headline about Glenn Beck’s “excitement” over the new treatment? It would be the same if he had never heard of it.

    Report Post » Lloyd Drako  
    • VigilantGuardShark
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 11:15am

      In case you havern’t noticed, when Glenn gets ‘excited’ about something, things happen. For this I would guess that a good dose of funding and perhaps some shortening of the time for human trials may take place.

      Report Post »  
    • RobertWW
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 11:26am

      It’s also a way to ensure a maximum number of people read the article. WND.com does something similar. One, to catch an eye scanning headlines, and two, to make you curious about what would excite Glenn.

      Report Post »  
    • anOpinion
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 4:14pm

      There have been two amazing advances in treatment that I recall in the past few years. I was also amazed that they didn’t get more coverage and/or support. This cancer treatment was one of them.

      If Glenn and team are looking for another life changing therapy it is the use of extra cellular matrix. A man had his fingertip cut off well below the fingernail and it grew back using this (no, I’m not joking), here’s a description http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7354458.stm

      Report Post » anOpinion  
  • miren
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:58am

    What happens to the nano particles when treatment is finished?

    Report Post » miren  
    • wordweaver
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 11:20am

      Same question I had, and it wasn’t mentioned in the article. Heavy metals are generally something you try to avoid in your body. I would like to know how the body deals with the metal and dead cancer cells after they are “cooked”.

      Report Post » wordweaver  
    • Jester311
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 1:07pm

      Probably the same way your body already removes dead cells. The gold nanoparticles are inside the dead cells, they go out with the other waste products.

      Report Post »  
    • IspytheGov
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 1:24pm

      Gold is a noble Metal and has no toxic effect at all, in fact Goldschlager has gold leaf in it and is drunk by millions every day, gold has, and is still used in dentistry with direct contact with flesh, and no side effects.

      Report Post » IspytheGov  
  • blaaaaackwoman
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:47am

    Does it matter what radio station the treatment device is turned to? I prefer 101.2 Oldies but goodies.

    Report Post »  
  • ConstitutionalPatriot
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:45am

    WOW ! ! This is awesome!
    Listen, all you whole food seaweed followers, Cancer is deformed cells. Your cells deform when being created throughout your life. It has been found that if you have a ‘T-57′ segment in your cell you will have difficultly creating deformed cells, think of it as an inspector. The inspector checks the design and if it does not exactly match the cell building it it is destroyed and the process begins a new. If you have two T-57′s it is just shy of impossible to get cancer.

    Now most people do not have the ‘T-57‘ so even living a ’perfect’ life you will end up getting Cancer if you live long enough.

    So yes this is HUGH ! ! !

    God bless

    Report Post » ConstitutionalPatriot  
    • Eliasim
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:51am

      Alright, we get to live forever, or at least put off death for another ten years, and then still have to face it eventually, but maybe if we live just long enough we will make it to them having people live forever. Alright, but then, if I live forever I never get to be a child again, or again. And, I never get to learn from the wine of life, and then I might become miserable in my soul, and beg for death to find me as the Bible says people will hope for death.

      Report Post »  
    • miren
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 11:00am

      Cells can only reproduce perfect reproductions a certain amount of times. After that, you get mutant versions of the cell that are different and cannot live up to the normal function of the original cell.

      Report Post » miren  
  • The_Almighty_Creestof
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:38am

    If we saved everyone that has died in the last 30 years from various diseases, they and their offspring, would be here among us now…and it would be standing room only. We want it all don’t we? We want all of humanity to die only from old age…as long as they saved enough in their working years to not need social security or medicare.

    There’s not room enough for us all in this lifeboat.

    And for the obvious trolls that will come out, I have lost a mother and an aunt to cancer & a sister to heart disease…and if I get cancer…I’ll live the best I can as long as I can…and then end it myself. I will not spend what’s left of my life in a hospital as a lab rat…and I will not bankrupt myself and deprive my loved ones of an easier, better existance.

    Report Post »  
    • jds7171
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:49am

      You are an idiot…..I hope you get cancer and we can see if you start singing a different tune.

      Report Post »  
    • Eliasim
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:55am

      “WHAT? How dare you speak the truth, and the things that make complete logical sense. Do you have any idea how hot under the collar that makes me feel, when you pour out the truth? It’s as if I was thrown onto a bed of fire. You suck!” That’s what most people are thinking about what you said.

      Report Post »  
    • Patrick
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 11:05am

      JD, That was clearly uncalled for. His facts and mindset may be completely false (Aside from ending it himself, that is his option) but wishing cancer on someone is horrible. You should walk around with that today and come back and apologize.

      Report Post »  
    • watashbuddyfriend
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 11:09am

      To The_Almighty_Creestof, I sure hope you will be able to Die with Dignity! Trouble is, you and I have our hands tied behind our backs by the inhumane crowd! My Living Will has specific, legal language, but, Society controls the doctor(s), so they are unable to honor my wishes.

      Report Post »  
  • GeorgeWashingtonslept here
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:34am

    Stop eating processed foods. Eat whole foods. Do not eat foods that have preservatives etc. You will feel better and not be poisoning your bodies. Chemical and Pharmaceutical companies are bed buddies…………why do you really think we have a such a high rate of cancer’s here…………..?

    Report Post »  
    • 1unwashed
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:37am

      Exactly !

      Report Post »  
    • Eliasim
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:46am

      Forget about God and your body and joints will ache. Moreover you think: live, live I got to live, and live, live live. Which actually means you are not alive at all, because you demand that you live which means you are actually dead.

      Report Post »  
    • jds7171
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:52am

      That is a whole lot of bull crap you are spilling. If that is the case, why were people getting cancers before preservatives were happening.

      one example of this is the queen bloody mary, who was daugther of henry the 8. She had a tumor but thought she was pregnant.

      She must ate alot of processed foods in 1558

      Report Post »  
    • Patrick
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:55am

      I will have to mention that to my sister in law. Gym everyday, whole foods for as long as I can remember, living a clean healthy life. Positive attitude, good and generous to other people.

      Actually, I cant tell her that now. She has Glioblastoma. She must have been one of the few that live that lifestyle that slipped through the cracks yes?

      Report Post »  
    • Ravings of a lunatic planet
      Posted on December 10, 2011 at 9:59am

      What amazes me about you people here, is that you take comments and blow them way out of proportion. I don’t think that this poster was saying that there will not be any “cancers” if you eat a more healthy lifestyle. How can anyone defend additives that are chemically produced and put into your food be better than eating a natural diet? Cancer has been around before preservatives were invented, but I would bet that the ratio of cancer from back like 100 years up until present is off the charts. I am an organic eater and do not wear sandals or have dread locks. I feel the best I have in years. Oh, and I EAT meat, cheese and all the crap that everyone else eats, but it doesn’t have any man made chemicals in it. Geesh. Get a life people.

      Report Post » Ravings of a lunatic planet  
  • glennmd
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:18am

    Unfortunately this “CURE” could lead Glenn off the road of truth into the wilderness and finally burial grounds of Cancer Cures that looked good. I hope Glenn‘s diversion into laboratory medicine doesn’t is not overdone; over time, it could bring him down and will inevitably be used against his most important, serious work.

    Glenn has no idea how much false hope and psychological damage is delivered to those suffering with cancer by the mere mentioning of the word CURE.

    My mother used to say “do what you know best”. Though Glenn is a crusader and want’s to do good for all may I warn that this research, should it not deliver, may ruin a multitude of reputations. It will surely be used against him and could be very damaging. Cancer progress is and has always been incremental and the nano particle may help incrementally but Glenn, please stop using the word “CURE”. We ain‘t there yet but we’re working hard.

    A friend,

    Glenn Tisman, M.D.
    Medical Oncologist

    Report Post »  
    • 1unwashed
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:35am

      Cancer is a racket in US. Read Larry Burkett’s book Damaged But Not Broken to find out what our FDA is capable of.

      Report Post »  
    • Zorro6821
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:39am

      Money is made is cancer research, Grants and donations, not cures. Curing cancer destroys the money flow.

      Report Post »  
    • apollo18
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:42am

      To illustrate Dr. Tisman’s point about deception in “the cure”, just ask Steve Jobs.

      Report Post »  
    • Eliasim
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:43am

      Well apparently God should spare the U.S because they may have a cure for cancer. I think it says many times in the Bible that men’s achievements mean nothing to God. Oh but never mind that little thing, and just go demand some miracles from God.

      Report Post »  
    • cessna152
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:54am

      Although I agree with your sentiment, I have an incurable Neurological disorder. So if you came about with a 50% cure rate for my disorder I would now have a new hope. I would consider that a “cure”. That would be substantial… if a person with cancer has absolutely no chance for survival and now it increased to 50%, that is hope! That is a “cure”.

      Report Post » cessna152  
  • JohnnyRaven
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:14am

    I had a microwave treatment on my prostate last year.

    Report Post »  
  • mcFirst
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:45am

    Why is this not splashed in our face and ears like Herman Cains affairs and the Penn state scandal.

    Its all about the patents in medicine. This will get bought and shelve if someone can’t make billions.

    Report Post » mcFirst  
  • Labeling
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:43am

    Godspeed

    Report Post » Labeling  
  • searching for the Truth
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:37am

    At this point in time, I would suggest that one visit a Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski in Texas if one has an incurable cancer.

    Report Post »  
    • Eliasim
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:41am

      Or they could just kick the bucket. Surely no man will acquire the Kingdom without becoming as a child.

      Report Post »  
    • Eliasim
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:58am

      Of course I wouldn’t make that decision for them, but they sure are going to be miserable by their own hands for not making that decision.

      Report Post »  
    • Choctaw1954
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 3:44pm

      I completely agree!

      Report Post » Choctaw1954  
    • Choctaw1954
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 3:47pm

      @ searching for the truth: I completely agree!

      Report Post » Choctaw1954  
  • Nunyunuwi
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:36am

    Long ago, a Dr Rife discovered like method radio wave frequency to destroy disease at the cellular level, http://youtu.be/L_jROHJktds this is a youtube link, where there is a list of info about this subject. However his RF discoveries over 50yrs ago Cured cancer, and other diseases, he was eventually closed down, his research hidden, lost, forbidden to be used, now this new idea Glenn speaks of seems to be of similar methodology I hope those in power allow it to be used…This time, millions have died and suffered needlessly since dr. Rifes days.Another informative link of the research. http://educate-yourself.org/gw/rifedeathofcancerindustry%20.shtml my now 19yr old daughter has survived brain cancer, the tumor is still there, small but not growing, brain surgery helped, the rest, chemo, radiation = ‘0’ benefit but many side effects she will need to live with sadly. I wish this type of thing was allowed…or even talked about during our cancer time. Sad, God will be the judge of all who have Not allowed the cures to be used to help human kind.

    Report Post » Nunyunuwi  
    • SgtB
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:58am

      I just made a reference to his method in another reply. Thank you for adding more knowledge on the subject than I had off my cuff. His method is amazing and simple!

      Report Post » SgtB  
    • softunderbelly
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:23am

      Wasn‘t he experimenting back in the ’30′s? I do remember reading about him and his work. Typically, the establishment, rather than testing his theories, hounded him out of the country. To Australia, if memory serves me well (or perhaps, he was FROM Australia). At any rate, it seems as if technology is beginning to catch up with the doctor. What a deliverance this would be, even if it helps only a minority.
      Wish you and your daughter good luck and Godspeed.

      Report Post »  
    • schmalshof
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 11:24am

      Royal Rife, he came to mind immediately. he accomplished this in the ‘30’s. i have his small paperback book which i have found costing from $5 or $6 dollars to $95.00. now a thin paperback ‘cost $95.00 unless someone doesn’t really want it to be read. He was sabotaged at every turn simply because his cancer cure did not and would not produce monumental income for the medical and pharmaceutical industries. We have lost millions of people and dollars to the greed of those professions. There won’t be a cure for cancer until or unless it can be sold to the patient for their last dollar.

      Report Post »  
    • opinionatedme
      Posted on December 10, 2011 at 7:50pm

      I have not read the paperback about Royal Rife, but I have read an extensive article about his “radio wave” treatment in a book call “Outsmart Your Cancer”. In 1932 he found two virus-like organisms that caused carcinomas and sarcomas. Royal Rife used a single frequency (sine wave) with a single carrier wave so that it would penetrate internally and could see through a microscope these organisms die when treated with his method. He founded a corporation called Beam Ray that the AMA under the direction of Morris Fishbein bankrupted in 1938. In the 50′s he with a partner formed a company called Life Labs. Again, the AMA intervened and with big Pharma pushed penicillin and other antibiotics and Rife’s method fell out of medical favor. He continued to improve his machine but died in 1971 never seeing wide spread use of his machine. In the 80′s & 90′s an underground interest in his machine sprang up. Also in 2003, Reader’s Digest had an article about a Radio Frequency Ablation treatment for breast cancer. RFA has been used on liver cancer since the 90′s. So, Royal Rife was the father of this technology in the 30′s and will never get the credit for this discovery. Now, will the AMA, big Pharma and the American Cancer Society destroy this “new” treatment also? MONEY TALKS!! and as long as there is money to be made in “research”, there will never be a cure!

      Report Post »  
    • 1bigdoggie
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:30am

      Thanks for bring this to everyone’s attention. I’m sure they have been trying to shut down Kanzius as well. Right now, some big Pharma lobbyist is greasing the palms of the FDA to make sure human trials do not start anytime soon…

      Report Post »  
  • randy
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:28am

    If this is proven to work, then the only people who will receive treatment will be Washington Politicians.
    The rest of you will be lied to and be told that this technology does not work.
    If anyone does not believe there are already cures for some of the most devastating illnesses that Pharma and drug companies never want you to know about because of the almighty dollar, you’re a fool.

    Report Post » randy  
    • SimpleTruths
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:28am

      I thought free market rules? So now you’re suggesting that we have forced regulations for certain things? Companies are to be required to share, even if it isn’t profitable? Sounds like socialism to me, not that that’s a bad thing.

      Report Post » SimpleTruths  
    • TalkingMonkeyNot
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 4:19pm

      TO: SIMPLETRUTHS Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:28am

      “I thought free market rules? So now you’re suggesting that we have forced regulations for certain things? Companies are to be required to share, even if it isn’t profitable? Sounds like socialism to me, not that that’s a bad thing.”

      Uh, actually, what we have now is NOT free market capitalism. What we have IS crony capitalism which is basically the same thing as crony socialism and very nearly crony communism. How do you like it?

      With a free market capitalist society, as in our original Constitution, there would still be those who would squash information about products but it wouldn’t be coming from the government. And if enough people benefitted from any particular product (ie. cancer cure(s), SOMEBODY would figure out how to market it to the masses to make money, not that that’s a bad thing, hmm? You wouldn’t be able to keep information like that kept hidden away for the exclusive use of the “wealthy elite” ONLY – via all of THEIR rules, regulations, statutes and codes sold to the public as laws but which in reality are UNConstitutional social manipulations for the benefit of the few to the detriment of the many.

      I can‘t understand how come so many socialists and communists don’t seem to understand that. Socialism/communism is nothing more, or less, than what so many of you claim to despise. You all have just been brain-washed into thinking otherwise. Up is down and down is up. What’s up w

      Report Post »  
    • TalkingMonkeyNot
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 4:25pm

      My comment got truncated even though it did NOT appear to be that it would when originally written.

      TO: SIMPLETRUTHS Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:28am

      I can‘t understand how come so many socialists and communists don’t seem to understand that. Socialism/communism is nothing more, or less, than what so many of you claim to despise. You all have just been brain-washed into thinking otherwise. Up is down and down is up. What’s up with THAT? (rhetorical)

      Report Post »  
    • TalkingMonkeyNot
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 5:31pm

      TO: SIMPLETRUTHS Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:28am

      AND, I might add, the millions of people who HAVE been brain-washed, have BEEN brain-washed by the very “wealthy elite” whom you profess to, shall we say, hate? OR, as is the case in most instances, by those who envision THEMSELVES among those wealthy elite OR aspiring to BE among them.

      The system we have now IS corrupt. But it has NOT been corrupted by free-market capitalists. It has been corrupted by those whose sole reason for living is to control everybody else. Those who crave power and unlimited wealth. And THOSE people, my dear socialists and communists, are the very people you claim to be against.

      You simply canNOT legislate initiative and the drive to succeed… OR intelligence… any more than you can legislate morality. Human beings are just NOT “wired” that way. Period.

      Report Post »  
  • Jezreel
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:19am

    Personally, when Glen announced on the GB show that the cancer segment was coming up, it was just like other news. They keep everything else coming first, keeping you waiting on the hook to hear what you want to hear. I hate that. I had to listen through this other sob stuff just to wait until the end to hear the segment on cancer, keeping people waiting in anticipation like some other kind of sensationalistic news station. I have had cancer so it is not some kind of game that you play with listeners, keeping the “sensationistic” reporting for the end. It is just very tacky.

    Report Post »  
    • artfromtex
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:37am

      He said at the beginning of the show that the cancer segment would be at the END of the show.

      Report Post » artfromtex  
    • just happy
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:09am

      sorry for your disease. Hope you are staying close with family and friends. Also I hesitated to become involved but family support groups and patient support groups were very helpful with my husbands battle. I can understand how you felt. Maybe Glenn will try to make it more clear about a story being at the end, I know he tried.

      Report Post »  
    • commonsensesue
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:40am

      Omg…he announces this wonderful news and you‘re complaining about WHEN it’s announced? Some people are just never happy…gotta find SOMETHING to complain about. Sheese!

      Report Post »  
    • BV FROM TX
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:40am

      John Huntsman, Sr. built the Huntsman Cancer Center in Utah and is determined to find a cure for cancer during his lifetime. If he is on board with this, it may be something to watch in the next 3 years. Glenn’s part in this is to get funding to continue the research.

      Report Post »  
  • SpankDaMonkey
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:09am

    .
    This is cool technology it will work……….

    Report Post » SpankDaMonkey  
    • SgtB
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:56am

      It sounds like a re-hash of a mid 20th-century cancer cure that the FDA had shut down. In the past, they would use an RF transmitter that could be tuned to the specific frequency of resonance for the cancer cells. Since only the cancer cells would be in resonance, only they would collect enough of the energy from the RF to cook and die.

      Also, it has long been know (although modern medial science won’t advise this) that fast growing cancer cells require more energy than normal cells. So an effective way to treat such aggressive cancers is starvation. If you starve the whole body, the cancer cannot get the energy that it needs to keep growing and living and cancer cells die off while the normal cells that burn through their ATP slower stay alive longer. This is of course not without risk, but most people undergoing cancer treatment are told to eat as much as they can. All this does is supply extra nutrients to the cancer that they want to die.

      I’ve had an aunt, an uncle, a grandmother, a grandfather, and my father now who’ve had some sort of cancer. Don‘t think for a second that I don’t take this stuff seriously. Modern medicine is failing us because of the FDA and AMA. That’s the truth.

      Report Post » SgtB  
  • Eliasim
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:09am

    Yes it is good news because that way we can keep having billions and billions of people in the world including all the billions of people whose souls were drawn from deeper in the bottomless pit (Revelation calls locusts), and that way with cancer cured and many more diseases can also be cured, then all those locusts can lie longer to take Liberty away from Glenn Beck. Apparently, that must be why Glenn is so excited. He’s excited that if there are billions and billions of people able to live longer, then all the locusts will live longer so they can complain and sue over Nativity Scenes.

    Report Post »  
    • Eliasim
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:12am

      Yes, the easy long life, let’s celebrate the very mechanism that has allowed so many locusts to thrive in the U.S and world.

      Report Post »  
    • just happy
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:12am

      merry Christmas eliasim. God bless you

      Report Post »  
    • Eliasim
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:27am

      just happy,
      Willpower is to stubbornness, as Merry is to insane. It’s in the eye of the beholder.

      Report Post »  
    • Eliasim
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:34am

      just happy,
      You have a Merry Christmas also, and remember if you speak to relatives and friends about reality, then it won’t be very Merry at all.

      Report Post »  
    • marvlus
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 11:05am

      Are you related to Scrooge?

      Report Post »  
    • PAPPY72
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 12:35pm

      @Eliasim – You write “Revelation calls locusts”…how do you arrive at that determination? I’m aware of the reference to locusts in the Book of Revelations, but I don’t find anything in the bible that shows that people are the locusts. I would be most interested in knowing how you arrived at this conclusion?

      Report Post »  
  • Joisey
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:08am

    I agree. America is too corrupt to be this innovative anymore. Big Pharma will manipulate the AMA and the FDA to block this treatment if it works, to defend their turf. And if that doesn’t work, Obama’s Death Panels will declare it too “experimental” and not authorize payment for the procedure.

    Believe me, Obama and his comrades have a keen interest in hastening the deaths of American senior citizens. With Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and nationalized health care obligations to pay for, the last thing government bean counters want to see is Americans defeating cancer and living longer. Plus, the sooner Obama can kill off the generations that remember America when it was free and Christian, the sooner he can erase our history and transform our children into mindless drones of the Soviet Collective. Anyone of an age who escaped the current political indoctrination going on in the public schools knows too much real history, remembers too much about how America used to work just fine without all those Federal alphabet agencies running our lives, and is a threat to their agenda.

    “Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, so why should we let them have ideas.” –Josef Stalin

    Report Post » Joisey  
  • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:57am

    Great news indeed.

    Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
  • kickagrandma
    Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:52am

    I have thought for years that the answer to killing cancerous tumors was already known but because cancer is such a HUGE business ~~~ chemical companies, medical machinery, drug companies, doctors, nurses, etc., etc,~~~ that no one was willing to put the information out there.

    I do pray this is at least one answer. Far too many much-loved people have died from this insidious disease.

    Report Post »  
    • quicker
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:00am

      All this research will go away if Obama is reelected.

      Report Post » quicker  
    • Stevsea
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:08am

      I have the same thoughts as you about cancer and many other diseases being big business for pharmaceutical companies and that finding cures will dramatically reduce their profits. I hate to believe that this is true but I do.

      Report Post » Stevsea  
    • TeaPartyDragon
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 11:41am

      You can place the food industry under the pharmaceutical companies in my opinion; all of the chemicals that are added to food is part of keeping a nation sick. It all has to do with money and control. Here is one simple reason we have no cures to disease in the past 50 years: U.S. Food and Drug Administration!
      I have friends that are Lactose intolerant and when they went to raw milk, it didn’t bother them at all?

      Report Post » TeaPartyDragon  
    • wbalzley
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 2:08pm

      Using RADIATION to kill cancer cells is not a new idea. I suggest reading about Royal Raymond Rife. He proposed using specially tuned x-rays to kill cancer. Some people claim that his methods actually WORKED…

      Report Post »  
    • wbalzley
      Posted on December 9, 2011 at 2:15pm

      There are at least half a dozen different people who claim to have a viable cure for cancer. Several of them involve the use of some form of “directed energy” (light, sound, radiation), some focus on drugs, and others on “natural” cures.

      If interested, I suggest looking up “Royal Raymond Rife” and “Dr. Burzynski” These two seem to be on to something…

      Report Post »  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In