Coulter: ‘Gays Have Got to Be Pro-Life‘ Because ’Liberal Yuppies‘ Would Abort ’Homosexual’ Babies
- Posted on December 9, 2011 at 7:20am by
Billy Hallowell
- Print »
- Email »
Ann Coulter has a penchant for making controversial statements that often lead to snickers, jeers and plenty of other reactionary responses. In an upcoming episode of Logo’s “A List: Dallas,” the well-known conservative pundit told Taylor Garrett, a gay Republican and a cast member on the show, some things about liberals and abortion that will surely get people talking.
The general premise of her words: Gays and lesbians should become pro-life, because liberals may start aborting their unborn gay children once a homosexual gene is discovered.
“The gays have got to be pro-life. As soon as they find the gay gene, guess who the liberal yuppies are gonna start aborting?,” she said. Watch her comments, below:
In October, Garrett claimed that he was the victim of a hate crime for his support of Coulter. Following a filming session with the conservative pundit, he claims someone threw a brick through his window.
Here’s how the incident was described, in his own words:
“I was in LA last week filming with Ann Coulter. I got back late, late, late on Thursday night. I woke up to a knock on my door. It was our apartment manager and he told me that there was broken glass on my balcony. I didn’t realize that my window had been broken because my window is double paned and it had only broken on the outside. I didn’t realize it Thursday night when I got in.
So the manager told me that he had filed a police report and the security guard that lives on site — he’s also a police officer — was there and he said he put my information in the police report. So, I didn’t call the police myself because they had already done it for me. Then, I called the detective to talk about it and they said, “Your name isn’t on the report.” And I said, “What?” So, that’s when I called and made my own report. If [the person who did this] really is crazy and intent on hurting me and I went missing, I want a report with my name on it so there’s a record of this.”
As far as Coulter goes, this isn‘t the first time she’s made controversial statements about gays. In July, she appeared on CNN Headline News’ “The Joy Behar Show,” where she stated her belief that it’s possible to “pray the gay away.”
Watch the appearance, below:
The “gay gene” comments are the latest to come from Coulter, who was censored at the end of last month for calling Arizona Sen. John McCain a “dickweed” on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.”
What will she say next? Stay tuned for more.
(H/T: Huffington Post)
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 677 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 529 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 417 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 373 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 329 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 270 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 279 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 153 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 147 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 270 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (110)
BuggiOlleo
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:55amPS Ann Colter makes me proud to be a Conservative!!!! She-is-Awesome.!!
Report Post »InversionTheory
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:14amI’m not sure which is better… Listening to the great stuff she says….or seeing how it drives the liberals so nuts that they start foaming at the mouth.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:21amI do find it refreshing to see a conservative woman essentially making the argument that “being gay” is biologically based, not a choice. She doesn’t say “if” scientists find a gay gene, but “when.” As out-there as her comments can be, at least she agrees that many people don’t choose to be gay.
Report Post »JLGunner
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:44amI wouldn’t be able to join Ann in holy matrimony just out of fear of never winning an argument before bedtime.
Report Post »PPMStudios
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:50am@ BuggiOlleo and InversionTheory
Absolutely both of you! I’ll just bet the Liberals commenting on this thread have blood vessels pounding and ready to burst in their collective little minds!!
Report Post »txn4justice
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:08amShe is pretty awesome.
Report Post »JRook
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 11:01amBecause of individuals like you Ann Coulter has made money feeding the angry mob by making seemingly controversial statements in order to promote books and get attention. Someday she should actually do something productive. She is the sad little girl in the front of the room waving her hand and blurting out answers in an effort to get attention and be relevant. AC should not get attention and is not relevant.
Report Post »PPMStudios
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 11:49am@JRook
Don‘t you believe the ’truth’ is EVER controversial? Should it be stifled if is?
Regardless of what you think of Ann Coulter, she makes a poignant and very striking point…..
Report Post »USAMEDIC3008
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 2:01pmMaybe thay will find the progressive
Report Post »gene too…
mrsmileyface
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 5:14pm@Jgunner ****** ALWAYS win the arguement….ALWAYS.
Report Post »EddardStark
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 5:19pmAnd WHEN they find the gay jean we will see a lot of Blaze posters becoming pro-choice.
I love her immediate transition from a controversial statement to the chapter of her book. Gotta get it in quick so it won’t be edited out.
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on December 10, 2011 at 9:56amAnn Coulter – smokes and drinks, has premarital sex, has a history of recreational drug use and has had two abortions?
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on December 10, 2011 at 12:52pmthe gay gene will not be discovered, but it does not exist.
homosexuality is the bi product of environment with a series of bad choices
Report Post »BuggiOlleo
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:47amjeeze, premarital sex was a problem not too log ago…Thank God for the 70s..Higher rent, bell bottoms, and hippies who sold out to make an honest living and also raise families..Too bad most of us became hypnotized by television, and ABSOLUTELY No alternative interpretation to idiots in the MEDIA..Newspapers still suck, nightly news died with Walter Cronkite….The jolt of the computer has not stopped changing the World–Liberal Media has NO place to run anymore..We call em out DAILY–yet, here is this ry-diculous Gay pc BS,, always nipping at the heals of free society..I don’t give a rats patooti what your sex preference happen to be,..butt it up-Don care,-next. But, changing the structure of marriage is just ridiculous..I do not agree with gay marriage, gay adoption, or transvesti anything.. Go get married on another planet or just go try it outside the US.. Pollute some other society which doesn’t have any rules.. Nudge it back up straight, pay attention to who we elect and get rid of Bozo the political fraud.. This PC crap is so entrenched inside public school; the only recourse is to rid us of the burden called DOEducation and its endless sea of regulation if a State takes the Federal Pill..Federal Manipulation Money Regulation.. The education death money… F’it- and this isn’t just about being gay.. GAy it up.. stay the F!@# out of the minds of my children, they can make up their own mind about life..
Report Post »InversionTheory
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:06amDo you recognize the humor in arguing that everyone must follow the rules AND that government regulations should be eliminated?
If the DoE regulations are the law of the land…why are you not content to suck it up or get out of the country? That’s how the gay community feels about your rules. The more each side feels the need to enforce THEIR rules, the less freedom we all have.
Report Post »aLinedog
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:47amInversionTheory
Report Post »Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:06am
“Do you recognize the…” et. al.
Airborne!
I agree on all points. Though I disagree with the gay community’s point of view (on almost everything- especially their argument that it’s natural), you sir, regarding regs and rules, are spot on.
-line
love the kids
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:34amAll a Conservative has to do is pass a law on a tax for a fetus and then ALL the liberals will be pro-life.
Report Post »After all, the fetus benifits from the system and therefore they should pay their fair share.
beninferno
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:29amShe is an embarrassment to conservatives everywhere
Report Post »InversionTheory
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:38amEmbarrassment? It would seem to me, as a gay man, that she’s exactly accurate. If parents have the choice, how many would choose to have a gay child? It’s the designer baby argument. If you can gamble on genetics or have a supergenius, superathlete with hair and eye colors you picked, a natural tan and free of disease… Which do you pick? And which do you think most people would pick?
Report Post »freedomofspeech
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:23amthe morning after pill is one the shelves, we may never know, all those little fertalized eggs down the drain. After science finds the gene marker for homosexuals then it will be beastiality, then bi sexuals, then asexuals, on and on we go were it stops nobody knows.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:19am“the morning after pill is one the shelves”
Assuming you meant “on” instead of “one,” you’re wrong. If you actually meant “one,” you can’t write coherently.
Report Post »Monday
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 2:47pmLocked — Grow up and get a life. You knew exactly what Freedomofspeech meant. I‘m sure you’ve had your fair share of typos as well.
Report Post »jedi.kep
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:21amI love Ann. She says what she thinks an doesn’t give a damn what people think of her.
And Joy is the typical idiot. Straight people DO turn to gay marriage. I know two people who have done it. So, Joy…once again, you fail at the most basic logical facts. Being gay is a CHOICE. Period.
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on December 10, 2011 at 9:59amCoulter is ALL about what people think of her. That’s why she so readily abandons all truth in favor of relentless self promotion.
Report Post »ZengaPA65
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:10amThe country is well on the way to being a socialist police state and people with a voice like Ann get on TV and try to antagonize gays instead of rallying for our freedoms.
Report Post »RojBlake
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:10amI have known those who claim that they have NEVER felt any attraction to the “:opposite sex”..so I can’t say for sure that there is no pathological pencant for homosexuality.
I don’t believe that there is, but I cannot make that a definitive statement (if I’m being honest).
If we go from the view that many cling to (that it is a pathology) then she may be correct, if you could determine the “pathology” of a child early enough, how many would want to avoid having a child that would not continue a bloodline (our most obvious link to any kind of immortality).
Rosie O’Donnel is upset because her adopted son is showing “male aggressive behavior” (he wants to play with guns etc.). This leads me to believe that the boy is likely to be “straight” despite her efforts.
Food for thought, not true evidence by any means.
Report Post »Hobo Boondocks
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:07amNo doubt many homosexuals would like to have their claim that they were ‘born that way’ validated by some assertion of a discovered gene. How long would it be before the gene for pedophiles, other sodomites, and heterosexual adulterers also be discovered so that they can all claim they were born that way? Or maybe return to the old, old excuse, “The devil made me do it.” Humans sure do have a penchant for shifting responsibility for their actions.
Report Post »mzk1
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:14amIt doesn‘t matter if there is or isn’t a homosexual gene, or one for pedophilia, etc. (There is one for Adultary; it’s called a Y chromosone.) Even if it is not innate, a person could still get the disorder innocently.
The point is, animals hump anything that will sit still, including their kids and siblings. We are human beings, and we have free wil to overcome biology. And we are expected to. How one got the temptation is only helful for therapists; the point is to try to overcome it.
Report Post »Zetareticuli
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:55am@MZK1 I realize you were joking, but just FYI with respect to men being more lilkely to commit adultery, I heard a recent study which indicated that it was power which most influenced the likelihood of adultery and not gender. Apparently women in positions of power are as equally likely as men to commit adultery.
Report Post »Hobo Boondocks
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:30am@MZK1
Report Post »The matter of males having one Y chromosome and one X chromosome does not prove or explain that males are somehow inevitably destined to be adulterers. “I’m an adulterer because I’m male.” Females have two X chromosomes, why do some of them commit adultery? “I’m an adulterer because I’m female?” To assert we only do things because we have genes that are the building blocks of what we are as humans puts us into the category of animals that are moved to behaviors, actions primarily by instinct (many animals ‘teach’ their young survival skills such as hunting and hiding tactics.) But who taught the very first ones these skills if they are necessary for survival? Certain Swans mate for life, along with some others- why is that? While others, such as dogs, horses etc. will have many mates, why is that? If we are all the product of evolution, the immense diversity within species and behaviors makes absolutely no sense, but that’s the foundation of evolution anyway, dispense with logic and reason and anything becomes possible.
freedomdontcomefree
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:06amSSo will ppl be able to smoke weed or crack when they find the dope head gene
Report Post »Stoic one
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:26amI believe it is called the ‘addictive compulsive disorder’ most obviously known as alcoholism which has a genetic predisposition. Variants encompass the other drugs
Report Post »mzk1
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:03amStraight people have not become homosexual? Really?
I odn’t know if anyone caught that, “Polymorphous Perversity”. That was (is?) the name of a Psychological Humor journal. One of the main things that the articles – remember, this is a journal by and for Psychiatrists, Psychologists and the like – were statirizing was the APA’s political decision to remove the perversions (including homosexualty, provided you didn’t want to be) from DSMIV, the fourth edition of the catalog of psychiatric disorders.
Report Post »Tankertony
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:01amThere is no such thing is a ‘gay gene’. Sexual perversion originates at the mental or spiritual level, not the physical. It is a perverted desire, that is all.
Report Post »Non-regulator
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 7:59amLet’s have a straight parade, or wait, that would be gay.
Report Post »jhaydeng
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 7:57amShe always has a clever way of saying things! Very true though!
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 7:51am.
We got caught in the middle of “Gay Day at the House of Mouse” a few years back. 75,000 GLBT Freaks & their Mama’s, and I was behaving myself until lil’ Skippy and his bubble gun invaded my personal space….. Sad to say but Uncle Spank is not welcome at Disney anymore…..The wife is no longer the vacation planner!!!
So hurry up and find that gene…….
Report Post »FREDD The WILSON
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 7:48amI always wondered why such a physically attracting highly successful and sexy looking woman like Ann Coulter has never married. Now I know why
Report Post »sapper
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:12amprobably can’t find a real man with the intellect to match hers.
Report Post »Cat
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:31amSapper …
Ann can’t find a woman with the intellect to challenge her nor the spirit to seduce her
Report Post »Choctaw25
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 7:41amThe dumb A$$ Joy thinks she can trick up Ann Coulter, give me a break. Joy is a has been leftist liberal clinging to a job in the MSM. The only time I watch CNN or MSNBC is when I happen to be in an establishment that has their TV tuned to them. I make it a point to request that the channel be changed, because it offends me. If they don’t change it, I request to see a manager and explain how offended I am being subjected to all the lies and misinformation on these broadcasts. I make sure that everyone there hears my request. Many, many times the other clients, customers agree with me and the channel is changed. I don’t care what it is changed to, the History Channel (lot of liberals there too, but), the NatGeo channel, anything but CNN or MSNBC.
Report Post »Try it sometime conservative America. Right now, I think there are more of us than them, but if we don’t speak out, we lose.
quicker
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 7:47amI just say isn`t there a ball game on.Usually works.
Report Post »Choctaw25
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 7:59amI want them to know I am a conservative standing up and being counted. IMO that is part of what is wrong with the voting public. The know 1000 times more about some over-paid druggie playing for some sports team and nadda, zilch about their government. Local, State or Federal, but can rattle off statics like they are going out of style.
Report Post »I Love my college football team, but they can lose every game and I will stand by them, if willy nilly lying Barry is defeated.
mzk1
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:06amAnn enjoys her, so it makes good television. I don’t own one, though, so I just see the clips with Ann Coulter.
I couldn’t see the first one. Can’t be shown in this part of the world (Middle east) copyright issues.
Report Post »quicker
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:07amWhere I hang out they all know that I`m proundly conserveitive.Really get into some very heated arguaments.
Report Post »REDNECK CALIPHATE
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 7:39amBeing gay is a choice. No matter what they say. They won’t find a “gay gene”.
Report Post »RodentKing
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 7:39amCoulter your out of your mind, How can anyone tell if a baby is Homosexual you dumb sht.
Report Post »jhaydeng
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:02amHow do you know there is no “gene”?
Report Post »V-Forge
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:06amIf it is genetic and not a simple choice then yes. you should be able to see it in the DNA. I personally believe it is genetic, I work with gay people and have been and still are friends with them so i know what i am talking about. it’s okay to be gay but it is not okay to live your life like every night is a sex party with a new collection of partners. I have known moral, respectable gays and i have known gays that were sex obsessed freaks. People need to draw the line between those and not a circle around them. I have known straight people that were moral and some sex obsessed freaks as well. Find a partner to love and live your life in a clean moral way and i have no problem with you. Eventually we will be able to do a premarital blood test that will let us know what the child will be and parents can decided if they want to have a child at all then this conflict will go away. let the gays be gay and shun those that are immoral and do the same with the straights. Just being gay is not being immoral. If you think being gay is immoral then i have nothing to say to you because you are not a mature, reasonable person. It is genetic and eventually there will be a pill that corrects it before conception. In the mean time look at your own life and morality and stop covering your own sins by attacking people that have done nothing to you. Some people are born with extra toes and some are born gay. Do you really hate those extra toes so much you would outlaw them??
Report Post »Ishmot2
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:40amIMPENITENT Had to use your thought in response to V-FORGE He is a moron.
liberal designer babies?
“education” and science, molding the perfect human…
those who forget history are doomed to repeat it…
RODENTKING That is the point, there is no gay gene, but if there were the Libs would use it on what they consider now, as their own. True conservatives are not into killing any child, born or unborn.
Report Post »joxer
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:17amThey can tell if the baby has down syndrome can’t they, it’s only a matter of time
Report Post »Stoic one
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:41amV-FORGE,
The promiscuous in everyday language are called s.l.u.t.s. ; being one has nothing really to do with gender but with indiscriminate partnering. S.l.u.t.s should be avoided as they are responsible for most disease transmission worldwide (of the STD variety).
Report Post »PPMStudios
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 10:03am“Coulter your out of your mind” I think you mean “Coulter YOU’RE out of your mind”
Again with the pointy finger…..
Report Post »Impenitent
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 7:37amliberal designer babies?
“education” and science, molding the perfect human…
those who forget history are doomed to repeat it…
Report Post »V-Forge
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:12pmThe interpretation of my point is lost here i guess. i simply mean that I think it is genetic and yes eventually we will find many things that will eventually be alterable. Being fat is genetic. So is being short or tall. Non symmetrical faces are ugly according to some study i read. You want your kid to be butt ugly? you would change it if you could. A talent for singing might be in several traits that can be modified. Your kid might be the next big star.. The seduction is too simple to ignore and it will happen in time. If that is distasteful then good for you with the ugly, fat, untalented kid that is just a loveable scamp. A person is who they are on the inside but i’d prefer to help mine grow up healthy, straight, strong and able to make college by 12 and i’m fine if he or she wished to be jewish or german.
Report Post »toomuchgovt
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 7:37amUnfortunately, it won’t be the liberal yuppies, it will be the islamic muslims. If the “liberal yuppies” do start pushing abortion for gay babies, they will only be a tool for the pro muslim agenda. When is the gay community going to step back from their support of Muslims? I find the irony in this support maddening.
Report Post »Choctaw25
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 7:51amNobody said that liberals are the sharpest tools in the shed.
Report Post »rambosharley
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 7:35amShe was also “on the money” with the statement regarding John McCain being a Dickweed…..so true!
Report Post »gr29az
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 7:40amwe agree here in tucson
Report Post »quicker
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 7:54amBut yet he got reelected.So sorry for you.Well at least we here in Tx. are getting rid of Kay Bailly Hutchinson.Got two canidates running for the seat .Doheast and rino or Ted Cruz teaparty faberate.
Report Post »satostud
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 7:34amMs. Coulter, SHUT THE HELL UP YOU GOOF. Please stop calling youself a conservative you are making us all look like a bunch of idiots. Do you even think before you talk?????
Report Post »There is no “gay gene” it is a CHOICE, period.
mzk1
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 8:10amI suspect it is sometimes this and sometimes that. But it doesn’t matter. There may be a pedophilia gene. So what? As human beings, we have free will and we should be blamed for what we do, not the nature of our temptations.
To me the people who try to stop homosexual from getting treated (when they wish to be, and no, there are many therapies, not just “reparative therapy”) are the real “homophobes”.
Report Post »rambosharley
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 7:34amAnn says alot of outrageous things, however she is on the money with that statement!
Report Post »RodentKing
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 7:40amHey Rambo, how the He ll can someone tell if a baby is Homosexual you moron
Report Post »PPMStudios
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 9:41am@RODENTKING
Did you read the article? “As soon as they find the gay gene, guess who the liberal yuppies are gonna start aborting” The first 3 words of the quote ought to help you out….
Report Post »RickWS
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 7:30amAll I want for Christmas is for Ed Shultz to comment on this. Please!
Report Post »gr29az
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 7:36amand the bulls on the view
Report Post »