‘Cranky Feminist’: Yes, Glenn Beck Makes it Into the New Gloria Steinem Documentary
- Posted on August 14, 2011 at 6:10pm by
Scott Baker
- Print »
- Email »
NEW YORK (AP) — “It’s shocking, I know,” says Gloria Steinem, allowing herself a wry grin.
And for once, the author, activist and feminist icon isn’t talking about a case of gender inequity at home or a human rights violation across the globe. This time, she’s talking about her age.
Steinem is 77, and most people are even more shocked than she is. Not only because she looks fiftyish, but because she is, in the minds of many, frozen in the 1970s — a tall, slim, striking woman with long streaked hair (it’s still streaked, but shorter now) and those big aviator glasses.
But four decades have indeed passed since Steinem helped launched the women’s movement. And this summer finds her in a reflective mode: working on a book about her years on the road — a combination of essays and memoir — and promoting a new documentary celebrating her life. “Gloria: In Her Own Words” premieres Monday on HBO.
Nestled on a couch in her comfortable Manhattan apartment one recent afternoon, Steinem acknowledges that often such tributes come at the end of one’s life and career — and she has no intention of either ending anytime soon.
But, she says, maybe this isn’t such a bad time to look back a little.
“My hope is, this film will make people think: It’s been 30 or 40 years. Where do we want to be 40 years from now?” Besides, she adds: “I want people to realize that if a very imperfect person did this, maybe they can, too!”
That self-effacing tone runs through much of what Steinem says — she likes to stress, for example, that if she had never come along, the same progress for women would have been achieved anyway. (Steinem was a highly visible spokeswoman for the women’s movement, but there were many others who made it happen, too.) Her admirers say they’re not so sure.
“It would have been like Christmas without Santa Claus — she was the goddess of the movement,” says Sheila Nevins, co-producer of the new documentary with Peter Kunhardt, who directed. “She doesn’t take credit, but I give it to her.”
One of Steinem’s most important qualities, says Nevins, is that she showed “how you could be the bull AND the china shop — aggressive AND gentle.” She notes that growing up, she was taught to think a girl couldn’t be pretty and smart at the same time: “Gloria made me realize I could.”
Steinem, though, makes clear that being branded the beautiful, sexy feminist was a double-edged sword at best.
“It’s a problem we all share, getting identified by your outside looks,” she says. “The most hurtful part is that you work very hard, and people say it’s because of your looks.”
Steinem learned that lesson well before she became an activist — with her famous Playboy adventure in the early ’60s, where she donned the bunny suit to go undercover for a magazine and expose degrading working conditions at the Playboy Club.
She deeply regrets the whole episode. “I could not have made a bigger mistake,” she says. “It was personally and professionally a disaster. In the short term it was much harder to get serious assignments, and in the long term it’s been used to ridicule me.”
Steinem can’t escape the Playboy story: Recently she’s been asked by many journalists what she thinks of an upcoming NBC period drama about the Playboy Club. For the record: not much, though she hasn’t seen it yet. “They were tacky, awful places to work,” she says of the clubs. “This will no doubt be a glamorized version.”
Steinem also wonders why a TV interviewer recently used precious air time to ask about that long-ago episode. She would rather have been asked about a New York Times op-ed piece she had just written, about a controversial new naval base on Jeju Island off South Korea.
Such an issue may seem off the beaten path for Steinem, but she’s long been vocal about a wide range of international issues, like sex trafficking, genital mutilation, or violence against women across the globe. “I’m just not sure I believe in boundaries anymore,” she says.
At home, it won’t be surprising to see her weigh in on the 2012 presidential race, as she did in 2008 — opposing Sarah Palin (”Wrong Woman, Wrong Message,” she titled a column) and decrying what she saw as sexist media treatment of Hillary Rodham Clinton, whom she supported over Barack Obama in the Democratic primaries.
Steinem hopes the current secretary of state might yet become president. “Many more Americans can now imagine a female chief of state, because of her,” she says. “After a second Obama term …”
For the documentary, producers amassed a treasure trove of film clips, photos and other tidbits that tell the story of Steinem’s long career.
We see a young Steinem tap-dancing in an elevator — it was one of her talents — and flirting with George Burns in a TV interview. We also see some striking negative reactions to Steinem and her feminism: A vicious call from a female viewer on “Larry King Live,“ telling her to ”rot in hell” and advising her never to have children; or, more recently, conservative host Glenn Beck call her a “cranky feminist” and making a vomit gesture.
There’s also news anchor Harry Reasoner predicting that Ms. Magazine, which Steinem co-founded in 1972, would fail (it’s still publishing today) and, perhaps most interesting, a segment from the Nixon tapes, with the former president dissing Steinem to Henry Kissinger.
Asked her biggest mistakes, Steinem replies with a laugh: “How much time do we have?” Turning serious, she mentions her father. She did not travel to California to see him in the hospital after a car accident, and he died alone.
“I had taken care of my mom as a child, and I feared I’d never come back,” she says.
Steinem also wishes she’d “fought harder” for things she believed in. One of the choices she doesn’t regret, however, is not having had children.
“I was in Mumbai at a women’s center a few years ago, and they asked whether I regretted that,” says Steinem. “I thought, if I tell them the truth, I’ll lose them. But there was no point in lying, and so I said, ‘No, not for a millisecond’ — and they applauded. Because they don’t have the choice.”
As for marriage, Steinem surprised many when she married for the first time at age 66, to entrepreneur David Bale, father of actor Christian Bale. Bale died a few years later.
“I hadn’t changed — marriage had changed,” she says now. “We wanted to be together, we loved each other. And he needed a green card. But it was so lucky, because when he got sick, he was on my health insurance.” The experience strengthened her commitment to same-sex marriage.
Her greatest satisfaction, Steinem says, is still when people come up to her — in the subway, on a plane — and tell her stories about their lives.
Like the man at the ticket counter at the Washington airport a week ago, who wanted to talk to her about his mother, and all her accomplishments. “It happens all the time,” she says.
Though an agitator by profession, Steinem speaks today of a new kind of contentment.
She was in a taxi recently, she says, and her iPhone was out of juice, meaning she had time to look out the window.
“I was looking out, and I had an amazing feeling of serenity, of well-being,” she says. “A sense that I don’t want a house in the country, or anything I don’t have. I was feeling a unity, a oneness.”
What was that all about, her interviewer wonders?
“It must be my age.”





















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (159)
spirited
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 7:50pmSeems curious that Gloria was silent when Geraldine Ferraro was called a racist by her party of choice.
>Oh, but she only takes on women’s issues. (snicker)
Report Post »Shiroi Raion
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 10:20pmDang, don’t you miss the days when kids had 2 parents and divorce was far below 40% and people could raise a family on just one paycheck and kids weren‘t joining gangs and kids knew who their dads were and kids weren’t having kids so they could continue that same idiotic cycle progressively eroding society. Dang. Darn. Dang it. Darn.
How far we’ve …. progressed?
Thank you so much, Progressives, for all the… progress
Report Post »Ray2447
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 10:22pmI won’t be celebrating anything to do with gender feminism, I’ll be to busy mourning the 50, 000, 000 babies executed since that vile ideology reared it’s ugly head in the sixties and foisted abortion on America. I won’t be celebrating anything to do with gender feminism, I’ll be mourning the destruction of the traditional family and the war on dads foisted by that hate movement. I won’t be celebrating anything to do with gender feminism as it is not about equality rights, equal protection, or equal justice for all, instead it’s about Marxist identity politics that works overtime to drive apart the sexes and create acrimony between them.
Report Post »My Two Cents
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 10:39pmTonight I asked four women between the ages of 18 and 46 who Gloria Steinem is. Not a single one of them had a clue.
Report Post »AOL_REFUGEE
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 11:02pmToo bad she loses all credibility with her support for that fountain of crap in the White House.
Report Post »Miami
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 11:48pmIf she only picked up a history book instead of the liberal banner, she would have learned that it was her Progressive predecessors who trashed women‘s Rights’. As we now know thanks to Glenn and David Barton, that women fought in the Revolutionary War, Voted and own property before that.
If only she had picked up those books, she would have call for a reclamation of their rights’ which Progressives had striped. So the Liberals have painted her a feminist hero when in fact she helped cover up her predecessors actions.
She’s just another victim of a Liberal education…!
PS: Looks? Have you seen Raquel Welch?
Report Post »http://video.foxnews.com/v/4247919/raquel-welch-on-huckabee/
Shiroi Raion
Posted on August 15, 2011 at 1:29amA funny video about a feminist trying to get a donation from a Conservative
Report Post »http://www.battlefield315.com/2011/02/feminism-explained.html
TunaBlue
Posted on August 15, 2011 at 2:26amGloria didn‘t start the women’s movement. It was started by many brave women years before. The number of master’s degrees and doctoral degrees that went to women was never as great during any year of the 1950s or 1960 as the percentage was back in 1930 (Thomas Sowell). They were more highly educated and professionally represented, and there were twice as many women listed in “Who’s Who in America” in 1902 than in the 1960′s (Thomas Sowell).
The only thing Steiman and her ilk brought to women was a distorted idea about sexual freedom and promiscuity, abortion and euthanasia, and the division and breakdown of the family.
Report Post »chazman
Posted on August 15, 2011 at 6:54am… I’m glad to see she is drying up, the old hore …
Report Post »progressives-are-retards
Posted on August 15, 2011 at 7:45amShe’s nothing but a nasty ole hyde who could use a history lesson and some d!ck!
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on August 15, 2011 at 8:08amExactly, she’s only defends liberal women which makes her a liberalist not a femenist.
Report Post »hud
Posted on August 15, 2011 at 8:32amGS living proof that there are zombies in the liberal realm.
Report Post »Seasoldier
Posted on August 15, 2011 at 9:17am@Shiroi Raion, Ray 2447, My Two Cents: You each make outstanding points. Although this article gives the impression that “Ms” Steinam has led a worthwhile life, it misses the point that she is just another member of the Socialist Culture of Death Elite who call themselves “Progressives” but actually promote policies that have historically resulted in the destruction of societies where they have been implemented, including Ancient Greece and Rome and, in the 20th Century, the Soviet Union, National Socialist (NAZI) Germany, Fascist ( National Socialist) Italy for examples. In the end, no one will remember who she was, what she did, or what she wrote or said. She will simply be one more person who died and went off to face her Maker to answer the question, “What have you done for he least of these, My brothers.” Before she can answer, the cries of more than 55 million aborted babies will be heard.
Report Post »Libertyluvnmomma
Posted on August 15, 2011 at 10:00amIt can only be “yes” or ‘no” to Jesus Ms. Steinem.
Report Post »Job 38
Romans 9:20
Jaycen
Posted on August 15, 2011 at 1:28pmShe said it best herself, had she not come along, women would have moved forward anyway.
Isn’t it the same with all the “civil rights” movement? It’s established fact that prosperity among blacks in the US was already improving, and had been for decades. In fact, prosperity flattened out immediately after the Civil Rights Act for a few years. If anything, the stupid movement slowed things down.
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on August 15, 2011 at 1:52pmGloria Steinem, oh noooo another radical Marxist Jew!!!
Wife and I were watching some old Jimmy Stewart movies this weekend and she commented about why men don’t treat women like that anymore.. I imagine the movie was made in the early 50s but the time difference was startling to say the least. I answered and I said one word… ____! But it’s really Feminism through the Jews. Or more accurately stated Marxism. Feminism is just a tennant of Marxism. Destruction of the Family unit. Boy have they came a long way of meeting their objectives haven’t they?
Ever see Jewish Hollywood portray a White man as an honest honorable law abiding wife loving husband and father? You have to laugh to keep from crying right?
Report Post »ILUVJESUS
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 7:48pmI’d bet you a million bucks that without the makeup, up close, she looks like hell.
Report Post »DagneyT
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 7:59pmNow be nice! She is a lone wolf. She is the only attractive feminist in 4 decades! Give her credit.
Conservative women, on the other hand, have Sarah Palin, Ann Coulter, Michelle Bachmann, Michelle Malkin, Laura Ingraham, et al, so we need to give the one and only attractive liberal female her due, don’t you think?
Report Post »Restored One
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 8:49pmI love the Conservative women mentioned, but they do put the make up on with a putty knife, same with the female FOX commentators. They are beautiful regardless. But I have to say that many of the Demo women obviously dont care. Look at Hillary, Wasserman, they all look like they just woke. This will become an issue with Michelle just like it did with Sarah. How much for clothes, make up, hair etc. I almost wish that these beautiful ladies would be a little less glitz.
Report Post »godlovinmom
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 9:38pmI bet ya money that alot of male politicians spend a mint on appearance, but are never asked about it…why is that?
Report Post »HUGGINGMYBABIES
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 9:43pmAnd i bet $100 she’s been under the blade more than once…..to me feminism means doing what you want as a women and being accepted by other women regardless. Gloria fights for women to be like her……..not for the true empowerment that allows women to choose their own lives and celebrate those choices. Shed no feminist….she’s a cranky old bird with a chip on her shoulder, a purse full of fame and a heart like cold steel.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on August 15, 2011 at 2:46pmFunny….it took Steinam 77 years to feel “content” and she attributes that to her age.
Report Post »Yet women like Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann seem very at peace with themselves and their families already.
Look at how Steinam cheapens marriage. “we loved each other and he needed a green card”. I realise there’s an element of tongue-in-cheek in her answer but her relationship is basically boiled down to a business transaction between two amicable parties. Crass and cheap little woman.
sooner12
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 7:45pmOh darn, I gave up HBO. HaHa
Report Post »Al J Zira
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 7:53pmThat’s why I gave up HBO.
Report Post »FoundersRedPill
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 8:53pmI cancelled HBO along time ago because of all the “saggy breasted hippies rubbing up agin each other” show too…this probably will be on Thursday night too.
Report Post »HUGGINGMYBABIES
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 9:45pmHBO is still around? Seriously who would pay for HBO anymore?
Report Post »GeorgieJo
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 9:59pmSOONER
Report Post »I never had NOR paid for HBO
Bill Mawhoor doesn’t exist
LMAO
lillymckim
Posted on August 15, 2011 at 10:17amThe only reason I keep HBO is for “Curb Your Enthusiasm” and when it goes off the air so does my HBO
Report Post »bill oswald
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 7:37pmSteinmen should get on her broom and go to Florida and pick up the other witch Blabber mouth Wasserman and go to hell.
Report Post »DarkFire
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 7:38pmhe can not get on a broom it hurt his pee pee in between his legs.
Report Post »decendentof56
Posted on August 15, 2011 at 5:42amTwo reprehensible Jews, for sure. Wasserman-Schultz is the poster-child for far left Jews in the US. She is a hateful ‘B….’, and is far more dangerous than Steinem. When chaos hits, it won’t only be the militant blacks which will be an endangered species, in my opinion.
Report Post »LibertyMama
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 7:30pmJust another useful idiot used by our government for its own agenda…. search the internet with “Gloria Steinem and CIA”
Report Post »NHwinter
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 7:41pmIts too late Gloria, we have been thinking for a while now and know you are a hasbeen. Retire and move to Cuba.
Report Post »Libertyluvnmomma
Posted on August 15, 2011 at 10:09am..we‘re thankful that Gloria didn’t reproduce as well.
Report Post »MidWestMom
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 7:29pmAt least she admitted to one of her crimes: she got married because he needed a green card – I don’t care if they “loved” each other or not. Still purposely broke the law. Typical “it’s ok if I do it but nobody else can” attitude.
As for the “woman’s movement”, it started out being a good cause (fair pay for equal work etc) but was sabotaged early on by her & women like her. They couldn’t just fight for fair equal rights, no they had to brainwash women, hammering it over & over & over into their heads that something was wrong with them if they chose to stay home & raise their children. Women who didn’t buy into her propaganda were ridiculed and taunted by her and her organization. She was just as guilty of discrimination as any employer or man because she blatantly treated women who chose not to jump on her bandwagon as somehow “less”.
She masterminded the destruction of the American family. And the detrimental effects of that destruction have continued for decades, with each generation becoming worse than the previous.
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 7:46pmSHE DID MASTERMIND THE DESTRUCTION of the American Family and totally lied about our role. She is another hollowed out, rotten cored useless log. It has been quite a ride – this destruction of our AMERICA and the AMERICAN FAMILY and our AMERICAN FAITH. I hope there are many of us ready to turn the tide back with SARAH PALIN.
Report Post »R.A. Bullseye
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 8:45pmI agree.
Report Post »Bluebonnet
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 9:12pmThen we wonder what‘s wrong with today’s children, unruly, rude and have no respect for the elders.
Report Post »EdBoo
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 7:08pmI loved her pass on the pretty comment “whatever that means”.Of course Steinham is attractive. It’s always the attractive women that scoff at how women are perceived. It’s like the new dress. “This old thing”? My mother called it the “coy disease” and blamed it on the movies. She’s long gone but I remember to this day.
Yes, there are not-so-attractive women. They usually give up trying and let themselves go to seed – fat. Their choice.
I supposed a certain number of women were created to be attractive to insure survival of the species. I like to pound my lesbian sister on the head with that when the occasion presents itself. She was pretty but now she’s just fat, old, getting older and bitter. No hope and no partner. No one wants to be around her. She thought Steinham walked on water, women were going to take over the world, all men are jerks, etc.
Guess who is getting the last laugh about something that could have been handled better by women and their handlers. They wanted to level the playing field so they did not have to compete as hard as men do. Ridiculous.
Enough of this drivel.
Report Post »robert
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 7:30pm“My hope is, this film will make people think.”
That‘s an interesting comment coming from a leftist whako who is so entrenched in stupidity and flights of fantasy she couldn’t draw logical, reasoned conclusions if her life depended on it.
To a person these leftists can‘t seem to see their own failings and they think people are stupid if they don’t draw the same erroneous conclusions to issues as they do.
Liberalism is certainly a mental disorder, but, more than that, it keeps people blinded to their own stupidity for their entire lives.
And the far left ideological nonsense is on a par with any kooky sect in the country today. Believing leftist cult ideas is tantamount to drinking the kool-aid at Jonestown.
Report Post »grannyjojo
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 7:32pmYou certainly sound bitter. I’ll keep you in my prayers. I’m not a feminist, not by any stretch of the imagination but Steinem did bring to the forefront the problem with unequal pay for women. I believe ANYONE who does a job should be equally paid, no matter the sex, race, religion, disability or whatever. I really don’t appreciate your remarks about women going to “seed” “fat”. That just shows there still are people who use how someone looks as a barometer of their intelligence, etc. “People” are made up of every body type. Please keep nasty remarks to yourself. Obviously you have a huge dislike of your sister and enjoy being mean and hateful to her. I hope you change your mind and realize she is your “sister” and one of God’s children. You don’t have to agree with her lesbianism but she deserves the respect of being a human being, just like the rest of us. Myself, I choose to stay at home when my children were born until they were all in school and I could work while they attended school. We were broke but I wanted our kids raised with OUR morals. I have worked fulltime now for over 20 years and still (women) are paid less then men. I pray that changes soon. God bless. “Every knee will bow and every tongue confess”
Report Post »decendentof56
Posted on August 15, 2011 at 5:54amGRANNYJOJO………”I have worked fulltime now for over 20 years and still (women) are paid less then men. I pray that changes soon.”
Report Post »What the hill are you talking about?
I worked for the phone company and the women made exactly the same wage as the men. It didn’t matter if they worked in the customer-service center or as an outside tech, they made the same. Of course, some of them could not climb a telephone pole, or do other things which required superior male strength. Even so, they got paid the same.
After all that, they would get promoted over more qualified men who had longer service with the company. That was a result of quotas imposed as a result of the work of people like Gloria Steinem.
So, don’t talk to me about equal pay.
AvengerK
Posted on August 15, 2011 at 3:00pm“equal pay” granny? Sure absolutely. What about equal rights for the employer though? Why does he have to pay a woman for 6 weeks of maternity leave? She chose to have the child, why is it her employer’s cost now? Men statiscally tend to work longer hours in the work place while women work less. Shouldn’t that be a factor? Oh and also recent numbers suggest woman are getting paid more than men in some jobs. Shouldn’t we “level” that?
Report Post »endgamer
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 7:02pmGloria’s Ms. Magazine got their seed money from the C.I.A. The publication was part of a broader psycholigical operation to undermine the family and get women out of the home and make them taxpayers. All part of the plan..Hope she rots in hell.
Report Post »endgamer
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 7:04pmtypo: psychological
Report Post »farmerdel
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 6:56pmI’d donkey-punch her and maybe give her a dirty sanchez.
Report Post »eat-more-bacon-USA
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 6:54pm“…She looks fiftyish”? Huh? you must be kidding.
This elderly anti-America hag does not look “fiftyish” – she looks ninetyish – her hatred of America and American values has made her an enemy of this great country since the 1970′s, and her deep seated bitterness and ultra-extreme liberalism has aged her well beyond her 77 years. Miss Steinem is an ugly person, inside and out and she certainly should not be celebrated, praised or given a soapbox from which to spew her venom. Miss Steinem decided long ago that American values did not fit her bizarre mindset – she is and always has been a repulsive pariah, and although she is now elderly and nearing the end of her anger-filled life, it appears that she has gained little wisdom or appreciation for America. The decades have not been kind to Miss Steinem.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 7:14pmGloria Steinem is a babe!
Colbert is the man for getting a laugh out of her with that one comment.
Report Post »JimCDew
Posted on August 15, 2011 at 2:45amShe doesn’t hate this country, she loves it. She just wants to change the form of government to a gender neutural National Socialist dictatorship.
Report Post »Tankertony
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 6:53pmI thought she died of AIDS back in the 80′s. Nevertheless, this shows that Glenn is living rent free in their empty skulls, and affecting positive change.
Report Post »I like the part ‘helped launch the womans movement’. Soooo sorrry, wrong. She helped launched the progressive-marxist female movement, which, after the initial fraud was realized, only resonated with about 15-20% of American woman. You know, that small minority of woman that will always be godless and leftist.
cassandra
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 6:52pmGloria if you think hillary would make a good president then you took way to many drugs in the 60‘s haven’t you grown up yet? yep your still a socialist
Report Post »libh8er
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 6:47pmI thought she was dead.
Report Post »randy
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 6:42pmSteinem is 77, and most people are even more shocked than she is. Not only because she looks fiftyish, but because she is, in the minds of many, frozen in the 1970s
Really? she looks like an old hag to me..
Report Post »leumas
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 6:42pmWho cares.
Report Post »JUSTANOTHEROPINION
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 6:42pmWow, Colbert finally found someone that actually makes him look good. Took long enough. See, proof that if you turn over enough rocks you will find what you have been looking for.
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 6:40pmI love the women’s movement
Especially from behind
Thanks Rush
Report Post »EdBoo
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 6:48pmGo to Wal-Mart. You will be cured quickly. Arrrrgh!
Take Rush with you. LOL
Report Post »teddrunk
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 6:36pmShe helped ruin it for women. Feminism is what ruined America, and all women got out of it was working two jobs, and having strangers raise their kids in high priced baby sitting services.
Report Post »EdBoo
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 6:56pmShe also help create the I-want-it-now generation which in turn pushed women to work instead of staying home to raise children. It was inexcusable. You can thank some of the current economic crisis for this. Don’t save it – buy it! If you have the money in your pocket you can afford it.
Report Post »SFsuper49er
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 6:57pmAll she did was force more men out of work and to be called deadbeats when they can‘t find work but when women don’t work I’ts still called a choice. Hows that for gender equity while our kids get pushed of to who ever they need to get pushed off to. Women will never understand that pride is what make men want to even function but yet they try to strip them from in everyday…
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 8:50pmNot to mention having more than one man fathering these children and not having to provide or take care of them.
Report Post »drattastic
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 6:35pmMAN ! I don’t care.
Report Post »conservativewoman
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 6:33pmThese progressives of the baby-boom generation (which I am a part of, but at the younger end) have been a drag on our society since the 60′s. I am so embarrassed by part of my generation behaving like this lady. The good ones in our generation went off to war, and then came home to work hard at raising their families and making a life.
Report Post »Look4DBigPicture
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 7:07pmI’m a baby boomer as well and thought this woman was absolutely nuts back them. In retrospect, however, she was right. Before the women’s movement, women had no identity of their own … all their value and worth was connected to whomever they married. Women were not allowed to get their own credit cards, car, house, or any other major purchase without a signature of a man. Women were only ‘qualified’ to be a teacher, nurse, or secretary, which were all low paying jobs. Today, women still struggle to get past the glass ceiling, but they have far more independence and opportunities than they had 40 years ago.
Report Post »mavericknj77
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 6:28pmAs far a im comcerned she can go encite riots and march for welfare with a soon to be evicted Obama
Report Post »ronaldreaganthegreat
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 6:41pmspot on!
Report Post »politicojim
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 6:27pmmen are pretty? I thought I was more handsome…. It’s funny, how she wants to say pretty, instead of cranking up that old brain, and to differentiate between biological sexes. I don’t think she is a feminist, more-so; she is just lazy, and so she calls others lazy, for differentiating. She has created her own safety zone, where she can’t be wrong; and she has ridden that ride for too long, in my opinion. Obviously, she’s scratching for more press and more men to support her cause. hypocrite?
Report Post »ds7
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 6:27pmshe is a sad, sad excuse for a human being and messed up as a woman.
Report Post »lillymckim
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 6:22pmSee 2 comments no one cares about the ole’ hippie wth is she trying to sell now… and btw has she ever held a job?
Report Post »Gloria celebrating Gloria … sad
ddg7
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 6:14pmThis old cow is trying way to hard to stay relevant!
Report Post »Ookspay
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 6:21pmSeriously, I thought she died in an unfortunate di1doe accident years ago… She got gored.
Report Post »UlyssesP
Posted on August 14, 2011 at 8:36pmThat would be one sharp steely dan.
Report Post »