Dairy Queen Clerk Shoots Dead Samurai Sword-Wielding Robber
- Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:39pm by
Jason Howerton
- Print »
- Email »
A masked man who attempted to rob a Las Vegas Dairy Queen with a 3-foot-long samurai sword was shot in the chest and killed by a restaurant clerk, KLAS reports.
(RELATED: Alabama Woman Shoots Home Intruder to Protect Herself and Her Ax- and Knife-Wielding Daughters)
The incident reportedly occurred at around 12:19 p.m. on Sunday. The clerk fired a total of two rounds from a handgun at the would-be robber, according to police.
The suspect, whose identity has not been released yet, was transported to Sunrise Hospital where he was pronounced dead, KLAS reports.
Metro Police Lt. Les Lane tells the Las Vegas-Journal the sword was at least three-feet long.
Authorities say the shooting appears to have been in self-defense but that detectives were investigating whether the gun used was properly registered. No charges have been filed against the clerk at this time.
They say only two employees and no customers were present at the time of the shooting.
Police have also arrested a female in connection to a sword-wielding, masked man who tried to rob the Dairy Queen.
The investigation indicated the suspect had been dropped off in front of the store moments before the crime by a female who was later identified as Carol Matteo
Matteo, who is 47-years-old and resides in Las Vegas, was arrested in connection with this event and has been charged with robbery with a deadly weapon, conspiracy to commit robbery and burglary.
The Associated Press contributed to this report. Front page image courtesy of KLAS/Gawker.
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 678 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 530 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 422 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 373 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 329 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 275 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 283 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 163 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 147 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 300 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 275 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (216)
ChiefGeorge
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:08pmNon gun to defend with would have been a different story. Justified Killing!
Report Post »hidden_lion
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:36pmSee, a law abiding citizen used a mere two rounds to stop a blade wielding opponent. The Michigan gang (aka Police) required 46 rounds to kill a guy who was barely a threat. Maybe the michigan police should hire this clerk to train their officers how to use their firearms.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:40pmYay……
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:40pmIf it wasn’t for Obama & big government there wouldn’t be a Dairy Queen. So it‘s Obama’s fault this happen.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:42pmThis is a literal case of bringing a sword to a gun fight; I am glad the clerk had the firearm and the ability to use it for their defense.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:53pmBan samurai swords……..and dairy queens chocolate blizzards…….I can see the legislation already…
Report Post »idaho1
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:57pmYep!, this action is 100% justified, yet they are investigating whether or not the gun was properly registered? How about the fact it was properly USED.
Report Post »eagledown
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:57pmHe (the clerk), will be mandated to watch Homeland Security video’s; you know, the same one they instructed our Border Patrol Agents to watch. “Run and Hide” and maybe throw something at the aggressor if your life is in danger. Off to the re-education camp with this one!
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 7:00pmMy grandpa always told me , he said ” son, now listen to me boy, you never bring a samurai sword to a gunfight son, ,,,, are you listening to me boy ????so I never ever did…….
Report Post »pavnvet
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 7:04pmRule Number 1: Don’t bring a sword to a gun fight.
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 7:50pmNo matter how many times you tell them… Don’t bring a Knife to a Gun Fight… they do not listen. The DOJ will be all over this… like Saganaw, MI!
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 8:31pmThat super samurai crap only works in the movies. Apparently the idiot watched too many of those.
Report Post »Bum thrower
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 8:57pmWas the sword properly registered? if not, shoot the SOB again for carrying an unregistered sword!!
Report Post »Wolf
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 9:09pmClose is only good with hand grenades and atomic bombs. In all other activities, accuracy is king.
Report Post »FormerLEAcademyInstructor
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 9:12pmDairy Queen’s corporate response will be interesting to see. They will either fire the employee or yank their franchise from the franchisee, depending upon the shooter’s employment status. Corporate doesn‘t like having to explain why their ’agents’ served up to rounds of lead with the dipped cone when the proper corporate move is to lay down, roll onto your back, and submit.
Report Post »American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 9:51pmHey blaze, learn to word your articles better. Coma’s maybe? I was wondering why a dead samurai wielding robber was in a DQ for the clerk to shoot. Maybe “dairy queen clerk shoots samurai wielding robber dead”. Switching one word a few words back makes the sentence make a 100x more sense. Aren’t you guys professional journalist and writers????
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 10:04pmHi RJJ,
I used to make Makiwaras ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Makiwara ) back in the 80′s and install them in Dojos ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dojo ) around the Washington, DC area. I had a custom design that I could install inside the Dojo. My friend that knew all the local Sensei’s ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensei ) and got me the jobs. Every Sensei had a foam handgun to train students on how to disarm someone who had a gun pointed in their back and my friend would ask the Sensei to try it on me (I had the gun). Every Sensei failed.
I have fun telling people to never bring a gun to a Monk fight. The truth is; the faster person who remains calm will always win.
Report Post »Reavin
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 11:13pmIf you’re going to criticize the wording of the article, at least get your wording right. It’s commas, not “coma’s.”
Report Post »rusooperman
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 11:19pmWait…I saw this exact thing happen on Indiana Jones.
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on August 21, 2012 at 12:18am@rusooperman
Good catch. Indy was supposed to get in a whip against sword fight. He was hung over and forgot his whip so he just pulled his gun. The director liked it so much they keep it for the movie.
Report Post »banjarmon
Posted on August 21, 2012 at 1:33amYa gotta love GUN CONTROL!!!! GOOD SHOTS!!!!
Report Post »Bill Rowland
Posted on August 21, 2012 at 7:31amThe classic definition of gun control!
OMG Niv 6, 2012
Report Post »Mil-Dot
Posted on August 21, 2012 at 7:39amEver notice how whenever there is a justified shooting the first thing you read is “and no charges have been filed against the shooter”-Like they are trying to say the decision not to charge was a close one and that the shooter was darn lucky that he got away with it? I have. But will you ever hear that phrase used when discussing say the firing-squad-like killing of a man in Michigan by the cops?46 rounds like it was a video game? Hell no, they never think that a rep of the state could be involved in an illegal shooting. Just us peasants.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on August 21, 2012 at 8:29amWhy shoot a dead robber anyway? Work on your headlines Blaze.
Report Post »scjeff
Posted on August 21, 2012 at 9:57amI am picturing the swordsman coming in and running a kata demonstration and then the clerk just dropping him ala Indiana Jones in Raiders of the Lost Ark.
Report Post »Yeah_Buddy
Posted on August 21, 2012 at 10:50amThe clerk probably forgot the rainbow sprinkles on the perps ice cream. You know how upset some restaurant patrons can get when you don’t get their order correct. He should have just called 911.
Report Post »yiddishlion
Posted on August 21, 2012 at 11:26amThe right to keep and BEAR arms shall not be abridged The Constitution is your permit. A right is not subject to “permission!
I have never registered a gun and I never will. I have been asked by several police officers if I owned guns and I always tell them it is none of their business. Then when they say I could be charged for failing to register I quote them the constitution and say let’s take it to court then. The conversation always ends there.
Honestly I don’t know why people put up with it.
Report Post »American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on August 21, 2012 at 6:05pm@REAVIN
Fortunately for everyone, I’m not a professional journalist. Proof reading isn’t required for comments by the average user, but should be for a nationally publicized news website.
Report Post »American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on August 21, 2012 at 6:06pm@REAVIN
Fortunately for everyone, I’m not a professional journalist. Proof reading isn’t required for comments by the average user, but should be for a professional, nationally publicized news website.
Report Post »v15
Posted on August 21, 2012 at 7:02pmSomeone has been watching too much “Kill Bill”
Report Post »pickupyurcross
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:06pmWhy did he shoot him if he was dead? Isn’t the title a little confusing? Good for the employee though.
Report Post »DesdemonasCrew
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 8:10pmThe title is grammaticly correct. “Clerk shoots dead (a) robber”. Not “Clerk shoots (a) dead robber”
Report Post »Zoe
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 9:45pm@ Demon back to school today?
Report Post »American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 9:53pmIt doesn’t sound as right as “Clerk shoots robber dead”
Report Post »Freebird
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 10:26pmThe zombie apocalypse is upon us.They are wielding samurai swords and seeking frozen treats.
THEY MUST BE STOPPED!
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on August 21, 2012 at 12:50amIf it wasn’t a Samurai sword but a Muslim sword I wonder if Holder would be calling this a hate crime?
Report Post »wvgirl
Posted on August 21, 2012 at 4:05amI have a hard time deciphering a lot of the Blaze articles. There seems to be a lot of grammatical, spelling, sentence structure, etc. This heading is confusing to say the least. Maybe a better heading would have been:
Dairy Queen Clerk Shoots and Kills Samurai-Wielding Robber
Or
Samurai-Wielding Robber Shot and Killed by Dairy Queen Clerk
I am certainly not the grammar police, but the sheer volume of mistakes in The Blaze articles makes you wonder how the writers made it through school and into journalism.
If you think this one is bad, read the Phyllis Diller article. It makes no sense at all.
Any time I criticize someone else, I usually make more mistakes than they do. However, I don’t get paid to write. I wish they would have better editing. I notice more and more writing errors nowadays. I chalk it up to the school system and also texting with incomplete words and sentences.
Report Post »RamonPreston
Posted on August 21, 2012 at 6:53amNo more confusing than “drowned dead.“ Is it ”half alive“ or ”half dead?“ Did the building ”burn up“ or ”burn down?” English is such a fun language.
Report Post »scrungy
Posted on August 21, 2012 at 11:53amI might be mistaken, but if I remember right the number 1 rule is to always double tap. Don’t forget to work on your cardio either!
Report Post »GoodStuff
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:04pmOne less Obama voter.
Report Post »Walkabout
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:11pmI would like to say 2 less Obama voters but Carol will vote from jail & some liberal will help her.
Report Post »kickagrandma
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:25pmNope. They guy’s dead. He will vote from now through the election at every opportunity, trust me. Maybe if his ballots are marked by sword, they’ll pick him up as the dead guy who cannot vote!
Report Post »midwesthippie
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:34pm…TWO shots killed a guy wielding a samurai sword…46 shots from six PO’s to kill a grizzled old man with a knife…
Report Post »ozoneman
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:48pmZombies are people too… or they used to be…should they not get the chance to vote?
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 9:27pm@WALKABOUT
Report Post »If he’s Dead… he could still could be Voting Democrat!
stloocardsfan
Posted on August 21, 2012 at 10:23amOne less living Obama voter – his vote will still be cast and counted.
Report Post »shagstar
Posted on August 21, 2012 at 7:39pmis everybody a friggin grammer cop nowadays?? jeesh,,what a bunch of petty moron’s!
Report Post »mcgrawactor1
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:04pmI love that at the end of this tale the are investigating whether the GUN was regsitered! What about the Samarai sword? What about the car that drove the robber and felon to the store~is it registered and properly insured? What about the driver…does she have a legit driver’s license? Are they in the country legally? Are they investigating any of those things?????? Sheesh!! So glad he got popped. and the store employee is safe.
Report Post »noland
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:26pmAmen Sister!! I”m sad that they chose that road to go down.
Report Post »afishfarted
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:32pmexcellent retort to the idiot who wrote the column.
Report Post »idaho1
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 7:09pmAbsolutely agree! Well said.
Report Post »ENIGMA28724
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 10:09pmGuess the popo couldn’t think of anything to say so they worry about the status of the gun instead of giving the clerk a community improvement award.
Report Post »swampy57
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:01pmWe need more sword control laws in this country! Forget the 2nd Amendment. This time we will do it right. We need to have anything including a pointy stick to be considered an assault weapon. It all needs to be registered, regulated, and transfer taxed because you can put an eye out with even a pointy stick. We need to do this to protect the children. They need to be brainwashed into believing pointy sticks are dangerous things. Remember, people don’t kill people. Pointy sticks kill people. Ok, that doesn’t happen very often but it could. And that is what needs to be regulated; anything that is possible. We need to control every possibility.
“I am Barack Obama and that is why I am running for President”.
Ok, seriously on an emotional development level above that of a 12-year old, I hope the employee becomes Employee of the Month and wins free visits to a local gun range.
Report Post »LestWeForget
Posted on August 21, 2012 at 8:58amthanks, good stuff! that’s where my brain went, too. then, next we’ll have fist-control!
–@advancingtruth–
Report Post »Eric_The_Red_State
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:00pmI wonder if it was a Hattori Hanzō sword?
Report Post »Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:06pmIf in your journey you should encounter God, God will be cut.
Report Post »MDECKER
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:21pmOoo-yoos!
Report Post »Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:59pmOnly two shots? I thought 46 was the standard for someone brandishing a blade? Heck, it was even 46 for a knife so since this was a sword shouldn’t it be like 92 or something?
Report Post »chfields62
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:03pmIt was a civilian, not the police.
Report Post »chfields62
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:05pmOnly takes a civilian 2 shots……
Report Post »Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:08pm@62,
I’m not the crunchiest pickle in the barrel, but how does that make sense to you? Civilian 2 shots, cops 46 shots. Please explain.
Report Post »Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:13pm@62,
Nevermind…I get you. Didn’t see the second post.
Report Post »Jim
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:16pmPolice keep shooting until you stop resisting. Duh!
Report Post »pavnvet
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 7:08pmSounds like the guy had some great training…two to center mass, threat eliminated….no need to keep shooting.
Report Post »gandalf1g
Posted on August 21, 2012 at 12:17amIts a matter of economics. The citizen DQ employee has to purchase their own ammo. They probably had the job done in one, but wanted to be sure a survivor couldnt sue him for defending himself.
Report Post »ZaphodsPlanet
Posted on August 21, 2012 at 1:40amIt’s simple. We civilians pay for our own bullets, while the police get them for free (our tax dollars). While it would have probably been very therapeutic to shoot a robber 46 times, depending on what kind of gun you’ve got, how many clips, etc. Two does the job just as well. Plus, no matter what the video showed from the security cameras, the police might have taken some issue if you continued shooting a dead guy another 44 times after it’s completely apparent that your first two bullets took care of your problem.
Now maybe if you were in a state like Nevada where a speeding ticket is more of an environmental ticket for wasting gas…. the headline would read.
“Clerk shoots sword wielding robber 46 times in self defense, The clerk will not be charged for any crime, however did receive a ticket for wasting a good 44 bullets”.
Report Post »who_is_john_galt_in_RI
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:59pmA well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
YEP THE 2ND AMENDMENT DOES WORK…
Report Post »oneshiner
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:08pmAnd who’s John Galt? I’m proud of those who are standing up for their rights. You can’t tell what the robbers intent is, and he could just as easily cut, stab or shoot you, so always be prepared to use that gun to protect yourself.
Report Post »tothepoint
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:43pmIn the last one hundred years, 56 million people were murdered by their own governments AFTER the governments took away their right to own weapons.
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:59pmThere’s a chance that if robber had a gun, he might have missed but hard to miss with Sword. THOSE ANIMALS who use swords should be told that most of us are ARMED and not afraid to use our GUNS.
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 10:16pm@who_is_john_galt_in_RI
“A well regulated Militia…… ”
I always thought that back in the 1700′s “well regulated” meant something else.
Fiber anyone? : )
Report Post »AnimalsAsLeaders
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:59pmIf it isn’t “properly registered”, then give this man a registration for it – he obviously knows how to use it effectively.
Report Post »Sy Kosys
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:58pmKill Bill Vol III
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:57pmOne less bottom feeder.
Report Post »chicago76
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:57pmWell done, better to be tried by twelve than carried by six.
Report Post »jake-spoon
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:57pmThere can be only one… and it obviously wasn’t him.
Report Post »fande3rls
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 8:39pmLOL , obviously not a Connor or Duncan Macleod , or it was a out of control watcher .
Report Post »Impenitent
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:55pmbetter ban all knives now…
/sarcasm
Report Post »Bobj_1960
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:53pmTwo shots to center mass, clerk is well educated.
Report Post »randy
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:12pmMy thoughts exactly when I read two shots……… Double Tap.
Report Post »Good for him!
Too bad for the bad guy!
Lt_Scrounge
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 11:53pmActually two shots to center mass against someone with a contact weapon can prove lethal to the shooter. Someone shot center mass in a manner that doesn’t impact the central nervous system (SPINE) will leave the attacker mobile and dangerous for 2 minutes or more depending on whether they have any form of stimulant in their system. IF an attacker armed with a contact weapon gets within 15 ft, they are too close and even a fatal chest shot may not keep them from killing you. At that point only two options exist, shoot them in the head, or shoot them in the pelvis. A shot to the pelvis will break the pelvis, and knock the person down with the impact of a Louisville Slugger to the waist. While the area is full of LARGE arteries, LARGE nerves, not to mention intestines, the bladder and let us not forget genitalia, you can always argue to a jury that you were only trying to incapacitate the attacker to protect yourself. Now a shot to the lower spine, bowel, bladder or either femoral artery can be fatal, but most jurors won’t know that. BTW this advice is straight from Massad Ayoob, one of the top experts on the use of firearms for self defense in the USA.
Report Post »Shellback
Posted on August 21, 2012 at 10:07amLT,
Report Post »What your saying is correct if you are talking about a 9mm. A 45 ACP or 40 w/JHP will do just fine in stopping this person at close range. The Green Berets weapon of choice is the M1911. Its muzzle velocity is almost half of the 9mm which is why some people as you stated are still in the fight if shot with a 9mm. The .45 will knock you down and cause more tissue damage. Motto of the M1911, “Shooting twice is just silly”.
Ask the experts: Hitler, Castro, Qaddafi, Stalin, Idi Amin, Mao Tse-tung, Pol Pot, and Kim Jong-il “Gun Control Works !!”
right
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:51pmOne less stupid crook. Oh yes, ban swords,QUICK!!!
Report Post »Mr.Fitnah
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:50pmNice.
Report Post »TheHalfrican
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:50pmWe need to get more control over these swords.
Report Post »Landon410
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:47pmdont want to get shot dead? don’t rob a DQ….
Report Post »idiot
wisehiney
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:46pmConfucius say – “Me not Japanese, but do not bring knife to gunfight.”
Report Post »westtitus
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:53pmThat is funny!
Report Post »POPTARTMONKEY
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 9:50pmi thought it was john belushi, there to make a banana split.
Report Post »Eric_The_Red_State
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:45pmSee – if guns cause crimes then mine must all be defective
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 8:36pmLOL, apparently mine have been just as defective all of these years.
Report Post »bdandsl
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 9:51pmIn this case swords cause crime.
Report Post »afishfarted
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:45pmWhat did Sean Conney say? If they bring a knife, you take a gun. Then say “You want fries wid dat?”
Report Post »dumba**
blackyb
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:45pmA dealth in commission of a felony would have to be charged to the dead man’s helper, if this is the case. It is felony murder, even though her partner in crime was the one killed.
Report Post »ZaphodsPlanet
Posted on August 21, 2012 at 2:02amAll the more reason to be a little more selective about who you choose to associate yourself with.
Report Post »John655
Posted on August 21, 2012 at 2:16amI hope she gets charged in this way, but I have very little faith in government institutions.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:44pmWell this kind of made my day. I don’t really care if the gun was properly registered or not, since he was obviously using his 2nd amendment rights how they were intended.
Report Post »hatchetjob
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:53pmThis made my day too. Taking out the trash!!!
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:56pmI feel the same way about it, nothing about registering a firearm in the second amendment it‘s just that people believe all the restrictions on firearms are legal which they clearly aren’t.
Report Post »Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:14pmI sure hope it looked like the scene in Indiana Jones when he shot that dude in the market.
Report Post »LVQT
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:44pmA maddening issue in Clark County, NV is that you have to register every handgun — that registration is evidenced by receipt of a “blue card” that must stay with the gun at all times. I believe the blue card requirement is a type of infringement on the 2nd Amendment.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:52pmLVQT I believe every so called ‘gun law’ passed since the second amendment is unconstitutional because there’s nothing in that amendment that says we need a permit or need to register a firearm with the government or anyone else.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 7:11pm@ProgSlayer, You got it right. Any restrictions based on technology should go through the amendment process. It’s that simple.
Report Post »scjeff
Posted on August 21, 2012 at 3:23pmThe gun may or may not be properly registered but it sure was properly aimed!
Report Post »BigDaddyTex
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:43pmDouble-tap in the chest. Nice control!
Report Post »magadog
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:30pm…could’a told us how tight the grouping was…
Report Post »godhatesacoward
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 7:20pmMaga…. Tight enough!
Report Post »magadog
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 8:57pmAmen!
Report Post »