Dallas Cop Reassigned to Graveyard Shift After Chick-fil-A Argument With 2 Lesbian Officers
- Posted on August 9, 2012 at 12:44pm by
Jason Howerton
- Print »
- Email »
A Dallas Police Sergent arrived at work last Wednesday with a seemingly innocent chicken sandwich. But this wasn’t any ordinary chicken sandwich. It was a chicken sandwich from Chick-fil-A — on “Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day” no less.
As the Sergent arrived at his post at the Southeast patrol sector, he got in a heated exchange with two female police officers, both of whom happened to be lesbians, CBS DFW reports.
The fast food chain has become a symbol for free speech to some, and a symbol for “hate” to others, after restaurant President Dan Cathy decided to publicly back traditional marriage last month.
It‘s unclear who initiated the confrontation but that’s what police say they hope to find out after conducting an internal investigation. A department spokesperson told CBS DFW that the issue is not that the sergeant brought a Chick-fil-A sandwich into the substation, but rather whether he made inappropriate or offensive comments while arguing with the two female officers while on duty.
He has since been assigned to the graveyard shift — before the investigation has been conducted.
More from CBS DFW:
The Dallas Police Association, who represents all three of the officers, say they are getting two versions of the story, and while they are neutral on the issue, the association is frustrated by a move made by the department before the investigation was complete.
The DPA points out the two female officers happen to be homosexuals. They also point out that the sergeant was responsible for reading the evening bulletins to all officers in the Southeast patrol that evening, including information on possible crowd control issues at Chick-Fil-A’s in the area.
The association says what concerns them most is that before the internal investigation into the matter was resolved the sergeant was moved to a midnight shift at the Lew Sterret Justice Center, which the association views as punishment.
The association also views the move as the department taking a stance on the issue before the full internal investigation was complete.
The Dallas Police Association says it is pushing for mediation in the incident between all three officers, but as of this point, that has not occurred.
(H/T:: Drudge)





















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (170)
JustPeachy
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:14pmThe whole thing has become so STUPID–the whole ISSUE about eating Chick-Fil-A or not. It‘s not anyone else’s business and it CERTAINLY was NOT the business of this man’s two co-workers.
My guess is he came in with the Chick-Fil-A bag and they began the comments–just a guess, maybe I’m wrong.. but that’s my guess. They may have angered him (which IMO would also be understandable) and he may have said some things perhaps he should not–but to punish him for it at all let alone punish him before all the facts come out?
DUMB! LOL
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:42pmMore proof that homosexuals are a problem in civil societies.
Report Post »Wango
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 3:08pmYeah, just a guess.
Report Post »conservredneck
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 3:09pmIf its not about the sandwich, why does the sandwich keep coming up?
Report Post »1_Smoot_Tall
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 3:43pmI got the skinny on what happened:
One ***** asked him, “How could you go to Chick-fil-A when you know you work with us?”
He responded by taking his partly eaten sandwich, waving it in her face, and saying, “Eat more chicken!” (Get it?)
Which, of course, the lesbos selectively considered a slam; hence the punishment.
En lieu of all the queer controversy I say Chick-fil-A should change their motto to:
“Eat mor chikin’ – less sawsige!”
Report Post »3monkeysmomma
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 3:53pmMy 10 year old noticed there was a parade of rainbow flag waving people on a main thoroughfare in our community (nowhere near the chick-fil-a) yesterday afternoon. I explained as benignly as I could who they were and what they were likely doing.
He was HORRIFIED!!!!!! Even a ten year old can sense how unnatural this behavior is.
Report Post »pitboss711
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 3:54pmSounds like the male cop is guilty until proven innocent. Hope he sues the hell out of the Dallas gestapo department and retires financially secure.
Report Post »landman1
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 4:59pmYou know all I ever heard was how cops had each others back. These two “ladies” are making it very clear where their allegiance lies and it ain’t with their brothers in blue..
Gays are becoming extremely aggressive in their quest to push their perverted and unnatural lifestyles down the throats of the masses. They are telling anyone that will listen that they were once bullyed now they are the bullys. News flash sparkle twins…everybody ain’t going to take your shiite. You could push on the wrong guy one day…I‘ m just sayin’
Report Post »Walkabout
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 5:19pmWango
As clothing & computing become merge, we will soon be able to take microphones & video recording everywhere. I don’t think you could survive leftists antics.
Someone who starts something & tries to get someone’s goat is going to be held to account.
Nothing you can do about. Police officer are getting personal cams. They will work in the office as well as on the street.
Have a nice day. You should. You still have time to change you habits so that you will not be caught on camera saying something stupid. :)
Report Post »The_Cabrito_Goat
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 5:23pmI grow tired of CFA topics.
Report Post »db321
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 8:23pmMy son a 4 tour of duty Marine recently lost his civilian job, when two gay men asked him at work if he thought Gay Man and Women should be allowed to marry each other. He told them, No, he did not believe that it is a Constitutional Right. He got a much better job and he still believes the save thing.
I feel that Gays are going to be a very violent group, we are seeing the mask come off and they are evil people. They appear nice and fun, but deep down they are deviant people and they will cost Corporations a lot of money.
Report Post »happygranny
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 10:52pmI am a retired police officer. In my day if anyone – male or female – would have come out of the closet, they would not have survived in the job. Much simpler days!
Report Post »bolec slodkie
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 11:57pmIt wouldn’t be an issue if the other officers had not outed themselves and then engaged in the conversation. I don’t care if you are gay. But if you care enough to tell me what do you want me to do about it?
Report Post »sillyfreshness
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 3:20am2012…..when the gays became the bullies.
Report Post »Ari Ben TZion
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 7:03amSupport Chick-fil-A, G-d bless Dan Cathy.
Close your Amazon account and ask others to do the same.
Put Amazon on the endangered species list.
Report Post »muzzleloader
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 12:28pmMaybe the female cops were vagitarians?
Report Post »vartian
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 2:01pmThe Sergent made a political statement by bringing in Chick-Fill-A on that day. The other officers recognized the statement, and responded with their own opinions, at which point the Sergent replied with something that got his put on the graveyard shift.
But you believe they had no right to voice their own beliefs, because it was “not their business,” which is the typical cowardice social conservatives display to opposing opinions. Or voting, for that matter.
Report Post »bolec slodkie
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 2:37pm@vartian
Report Post »Silly me. I though political opinions were protected by the first amendment>
MAX0O1
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 10:39pmPOLITICAL CORRECTNESS run amok. GETTING pretty damn TIRED of it!!!!!!
Report Post »DetritusScreener
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:12pmIt sounds like the male cop has a case for sexual harassment and discrimination in the workplace.
Report Post »QuincySmith
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:34pmIt would be interesting to see if female cops were re-assigned. If not, I think you are correct!
Report Post »chips1
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:38pmDepends on what the two lesbians ate for lunch.
Report Post »texastommy
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:44pmI see what you did there. :-)
Report Post »iampraying4u
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 4:38pmDrink more tea,eat more chicken
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:10pmWomen… have more receptors in each Eye… which allows them to see better in the Dark… and gives them better peripherial vision. So, “night work”… has always been the preferred asignment of women!
Report Post »welovetheUSA
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:10pmPut the lesbos on the front line….heheheheheh
Report Post »forthepeople
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:10pmTake back America ! November can not come soon enough !
Report Post »Smokey_Bojangles
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:09pmI am sure the Officer was more interested in starting a row with a couple of Carpet Munchers instead of enjoying his Chicken Sandwich and his brief lunch break.
Report Post »That is what every heterosexual wants to do on their lunch break.Instead of taking a break and enjoying lunch,we just look for some perverts to argue with.
historyguy48
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:19pmOr perhaps he just upset them when he told the pair of them to go and perform an impossible act to themselves.
Report Post »Wango
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 3:09pmSMOKEY . . . Playing the bigot card for us. Thanks.
Report Post »Walkabout
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 5:26pmIf you want hate, read comments at a gay website.
Report Post »the_system_disconnect
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:08pmI can see moving the shifts as to alleviate pressure. There’s nothing wrong with that. In a security company, a graveyard shift can be expected.
It’s a shame really whoever started the argument…. Free speech with love, people.
Report Post »Sirfoldallot
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:16pmGive the 2 he/she’s a donute & walk away.
Report Post »the_system_disconnect
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:17pmI don’t know why I said security company :P
Report Post »Kenszen
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:31pmSo based on that line of reasoning, why weren’t the two female officers reassigned?
Report Post »getourcountryback
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:08pmThe female(?) officers should have kept their opinions to themselves and let the man enjoy his lunch and the right to eat his sandwich without harassment. Oh yeah, it is only okay to make a statement if you are a liberal queer, not if you are a conservative christian. I forgot.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:12pm“The female(?) officers should have kept their opinions to themselves and let the man enjoy his lunch and the right to eat his sandwich without harassment.”
According to the article, it is unknown who started the argument. Freedom of speech: if someone antagonizes someone else, they can bite back (verbally; pretty sure it’s assault otherwise).
Report Post »wtd
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:40pmIt wouldn’t surprise me in the least if the male officer arrived with his lunch and casually remarked about the unusually brisk business at Chick-fil-A, completely unaware of the situation. “Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day” wasn’t a company promotion. It was a grass roots event which wasn’t advertised by the msm before it took place. However, the female officers, having been identified as gay, were more than likely fully aware of the protest given the background behind the “Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day” .
Report Post »Typical leftist/progressive tactic to turn the situation on it’s head – never let a crisis go to waste.
jvlag3
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 2:43pm“According to the article, it is unknown who started the argument. Freedom of speech: if someone antagonizes someone else, they can bite back (verbally; pretty sure it’s assault otherwise).”
They will investigate, find out that the female (homosexual) police officers started it and nothing will happen…the male (heterosexual) police officer remains on graveyard duty with at ding in his file and everyone goes on their happy way…
Report Post »BeingThere
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:05pm1. Women should not be police officers
Report Post »2. Homosexuals should not be police officers.
shimauma
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 4:04pmYou are right regarding # 2 seeing as a male cop in AZ was charged with sexual misconduct regarding two underaged males(typical homosexual, trying to recruit) : http://www.myfoxphoenix.com/story/19227141/phoenix-police-officer-faces-felony-charges
Regarding #1, I think women should be allowed to be employed by police stations, adminstratively(we are the best ones to keep track of filing and such)
Report Post »bolec slodkie
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 12:00am1) Who will search female prisoners to prevent accusations of inappropriate sexual contact during searches?
Report Post »MeteoricLimbo
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:01pmand all he wanted was some freakin chicken.
Report Post »banjarmon
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:12pmDO the two female police officers work together…If they do what are they doing on their shift…undercover work???
Report Post »OhioRifleman
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 3:56pm@ Banjarmon
I see what you did there…O.o
Report Post »SquidVetOhio
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:01pm“A department spokesperson told CBS DFW that the issue is not that the sergeant brought a Chick-fil-A sandwich into the substation, but rather whether he made inappropriate or offensive comments while arguing with the two female officers while on duty.”
Well, the spokesperson has already set him up as the bad guy. I guess the two lesbians were just minding their own business and didn’t say a word about what he was eating.
P.S. The fact that they were female cops, did they article even have to mention they were lesbians? I think that was safe to assume.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:00pmWomen cops really? Yes yes I know departments are forced to hire them because of quotas and the government controlling every detail of everything and everyone’s equal BS. Women aren‘t effective as cops especially in a brawl and if you’re afraid to admit that then PC really does work, at least on you.
Two **** cops who think they’re men got into an argument with a real man and big surprise the real cop gets reassigned nothing new here.
Report Post »Wango
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 3:10pmEasy, gramps. Maybe you should go out into the shop and build another weather vane.
Report Post »LIBSALWAYSLIE
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 3:29pmWango, what are you 12 years old? I hope so, otherwise the childish rants are a sure sign of chronic liberalism.
Report Post »Wango
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 4:26pmLIBSALWAYSPREVAIL . . .Better, but still a looooong way to go. Don’t give up. You’re mere days away.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 7:14pmWANGO Gramps eh? lmao That’s your first mistake making an assumption. That’s quite a mug shot there is that you? I didn’t know they allowed pedophile prisoners internet access,how much does it cost us there wango tango?
Report Post »Wango
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 9:40pmWILLIAMTAFTITE . . . Oh goodie, another chance to tell my story. Full disclosure – that’s not actually me. If only! No, that’s a patriot of such epic proportion he must spread himself across two of our greatest states – Michigan, where the militias run free, and Texas, home of our chaps and spurs ubermen. One more clue – he’s a rock god. GOD, man! Yep, that’s Ted Nugent. THE NUGE! Uncle T! Motor City Mad Man. Just saying his name gets my fingers scratching the air.
Did you know that my boy once crapped in his pants for a week just to avoid military service? Say what you will, the man knows how to sacrifice. Wait, it gets better. He’s also a self-admitted sexual felon. Underage girls. Yeah, I know – awesome with a capital AWE and then some. Right? He’s my eternal teen idol. I bet he’s yours now too.
I just never get tired of telling that story. Thanks.
Report Post »paulusmaximus
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:00pm“two female police officers, both of whom (happened to be lesbians), CBS DFW reports” .They accused him “whether he made inappropriate or offensive comments while arguing with the two female officers while on duty” He doesn’t have a chance of a fair hearing,PC will get him. They have already made up their minds.
Report Post »hi
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:00pmMentioning that they are lesbians is saying “I have sex with women.” That is sexual harrassment in the workplace.
Report Post »hi
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:08pmclarification…so the male should be able to sue them for bringing up the topic of sex in the workplace.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:14pm“Mentioning that they are lesbians is saying “I have sex with women.””
Actually, it’s saying they are attracted to women. Odd, you‘d think they’d find common ground with a heterosexual male officer!
Report Post »hi
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:27pm“I am sexually attracted to women” is sexual harrassment against the police officer.
Report Post »salvawhoray
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 12:58pmit’s not about the sandwich, but it is about catering to less than a percent of people.
And i‘m sure the *****’s started it.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:02pmI’ve seen a few bull ***** think they can take out a real man in a fight and I’ve never seen the bull **** win,weird huh?
Report Post »SREGN
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:17pmProgressive – Yeah, and its amazing how afterward when it goes to court how the bd “victim” shows up in lipstick wearing a dress.
Report Post »Wango
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 3:13pmPROGROCKER . . . Odd, I saw one take down a Tea Party guy dressed up in a powdered wig and capri pants. Left him in a red, white and blue puddle whimpering something about, “Don’t tread on me. Please for the love of god, I’ll do anything you want, I’m sorry, just don’t tread on me.”
Sad, really.
Report Post »gs425
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 4:31pm…and then wango woke up.
Report Post »calyptratus
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 12:57pmHe will be reassigned to checking on people’s liquor licenses
Report Post »lembrandt
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 12:56pmWhat would you expect? You *know* you can’t even argue with homosexuals. It’s just like disagreeing with Obama is proof positive of racism. This officer was clearly demonstrating hate against lesbians by even just holding a Chik-Fil-A sandwich. When he argued with them he went way over the line. Not only is he lucky he still has a job, he‘s lucky he’s not currently in jail.
Report Post »Popp40
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:06pmIt’s only a matter of time before they start jailing people over this.
Report Post »SREGN
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:19pmChick Fil A chicken is Freedom Chicken.
Report Post »djaznh
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 12:56pmI see SUIT all over this one….and I hope the man wins.
Report Post »Realist4U
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:04pmHe needs to sue not only the department, but, the moron that made the decision to transfer him. They made it personal, therefore, he should respond personally. The police are acting with impunity. “Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.”
Report Post »taxpro4u03
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:28pmHard to believe the guy would ‘intentionally’ (albeit subliminally) INFLAME the two females whom he obviously ‘knew,‘ or had ’probable cause to believe‘ would ’provoke an argument.’ – Investigation my ice. All three should be suspended without pay for 90 days for 1st offense — he, for knowingly and intentionally instigating and provoking the situation, the two females involved for ‘acting’ on the provocation. — End of story. Zero tolerance for ANY of it from either side. Union or not — there is still a duty to AVOID even the slightest APPEARANCE of what ‘could’ be construed as a conflict of interest… its a tough job for them — this incident IMHO serves but to further erode an already credibility-challenged ‘law enforcement’ “collective.” — Those serving in the best interest of our communities, thumbs up. We love ya, that’s why WE delegated the positions TO you on our behalf.
Report Post »Blazebanned
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 12:55pmIf i’m the officer i sue the crap out of the city of Dallas.I have never met a **** cop who wasnt a pos,they walk around with a chip on their shoulders,and dare you to knock it of. These so called “:women” are hired w/o ever having to meet any type of psych eval. because they are a so called minority,same goes for blacks and hispanics.Truth is, this story will fall by the wayside, and even the Blaze will not do a follow up on it…..
Report Post »ThinkingSidewayz
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 3:14pmWomen, Blacks and Hispanics never have to take psych eval to get hired because they are the minority.”
Getting your facts from opinions.com I see
Report Post »Popp40
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 12:55pmIt is obvious that you must believe as they do or you will be punished…..and they are supposedly the “tolerant” group.
Report Post »JawaJam
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 12:54pmWe need to make sure we have all the details but on the surface this looks bad for the department. Punishing someone for their personal beliefs should never happen, oh wait I forgot since he is a straight male it is perfectly okay.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 12:54pmWell duh..of course. Homosexuals must be coddled and adored. They’re not to be treated like you and me. They’re very special..they’re the best of us.
Report Post »Wango
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 3:16pmLooking out for your own. I admire that. It’s a pleasure to see a conservative admit to being “that way.” You, sir, are a man among men. Lots and lots of men. I hope a few of your brothers here shower you with their . . . golden respect.
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 8:53pmEven though there‘s no scientific evidence to show that they’re born that way.
Report Post »Wango
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 9:43pmGIT-R-DUM . . There’s no scientific evidence of god either. Shouldn’t you be more worried about that than whether “those stirrings” you have in the shower are genetic or preference?
Report Post »blackyb
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 12:53pmThat department needs a law suit for violation of that cops rights to shop where he wants.
Report Post »Realist4U
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:00pmAmen!
Report Post »Sirfoldallot
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:02pmAll of them r Eric Holder Dope’s. When PC speech is given creedance we all lose our freedom of speech. Weridos on the up swing , good greef !!!!
Report Post »blackyb
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 12:51pmSo carpet munchers are dictating where other police officers can go eat their lunch or dinner? They need to mind their own business and those who assigned the officer to third shift needs to lose their jobs. It is none of any of their business where anyone goes to eat. They need to get off their high horse and realize this pandering to carpet munchers and the like is about seen it’s best day.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 1:17pm“They need to mind their own business and those who assigned the officer to third shift needs to lose their jobs. ”
According to the article, it’s unclear who started the argument. If it was the women, I agree, they should be punished. If it was the man, he should be punished.
I could easily see someone coming back from work, bragging in front of two known lesbians about how great it was to see people at National Chick-fil-A day. That’s not a class act at all. I’d feel the same way if the two women came back a few days later and started saying how great it was to be able to kiss their partners at Chick-fil-A during their National Kiss-a-Chick (or whatever it was called) event.
Report Post »deeberj
Posted on August 9, 2012 at 12:51pmHe should not be punished before the internal investigation is concluded. Or they all should have been moved to somewhere else or another shift. Not just him.
In the state where I work, years ago a high ranking state official was accused of sexual harrassment by an employee. They fired him right away. When the case went to court he was found not guilty. And the state had to pay him back pay because they should not have fired him.
This is sortof the same.
Report Post »