David Axelrod: ‘I’m Not Sure Mitt Romney Would Have Made That Decision’ to Kill Bin Laden
- Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:33pm by
Madeleine Morgenstern
- Print »
- Email »

AP
President Barack Obama‘s chief campaign strategist David Axelrod said Sunday he’s “not sure” if Mitt Romney would have made the same decision to take out Osama bin Laden.
Axelrod made his remarks on ABC’s “This Week” in the context of discussing Obama’s national security credentials, which have come under fire from the GOP presidential candidates hoping to unseat him.
“I think when you look at the record — ending the war in Iraq, bringing Osama bin Laden to justice, destroying the leadership of Al Qaida. I think Americans know that this president — he’s made some very tough calls,” Axelrod told George Stephanopoulos, hosting the show for the first time since Christiane Amanpour left.
“I know Mitt Romney said well, any president would have given the order on Osama bin Laden. [Former Defense Secretary] Bob Gates said it was the most courageous decision he’s seen a president make in his 30 years in Washington,” Axelrod said. “I’m not sure Mitt Romney would have made that decision, that was a very courageous decision.”
Axelrod’s remark went unchallenged by Stephanopoulos.
Romney said in December he believed any president would have given the order to kill bin Laden.
“With regards to Osama bin Laden, we’re delighted that he gave the order, take out Osama bin Laden. Any president would have done that, but this one did and that’s a good thing,“ he said on ”Fox News Sunday.”
Watch the clip below, via ABC. Axelrod’s comments about national security begin at the 6:27 mark:





















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (215)
Baddoggy
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:05pmIf Ron Paul had of been President way back then, there would not have even been an Osama Bin Ladin in the first place!! We would not have given him backing to come to power by giving him backing. People that think we need to keep nation building, them destroying that country and paying to rebuild it again are fools! Neocons never learn, no matter how many of our boys die.
Report Post »hazmat_factor
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:18pmPauly punks never learn, they just spout more crap!
Report Post »Drakkhanlord
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:19pmWe would not have made AL-CIA-DA …We would have not Continued to fund all the Ter’ror groups , that the USgovt helped create…
Axelrod is a Treasonous Tool…
Kirk: [Explaining Spock's odd behavior]
Report Post »“” Oh, him? He’s harmless. Part of the free speech movement at Berkeley in the sixties. I think he did a little too much LDS. “”
dealer@678
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:42pmObama or Osama. Their both cut from the same cloth
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:54pmCalling me a punk Hazmat…You definately do not know me. Maybe i could show you some medals won during Combat? Maybe you should meet some of the men who served under me. I am sure they would not call me a punk. Who’s your daddy now?
Report Post »HoggKilla
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:54pmIts is what it is and we are where we are. Its what we do moving forward that counts. BHO needs to go regardless of who gets the GOP nod. Our foreign policy will be the least of our worries if BOH gets another 4 years.
Whats sad is the media and the left can say and do anything uncontested. If they are challenged, its never reported.
As for Dave Ax. He’s a joke just like the whole BHO admin. I love it how they make it sound like BHO went through BUD’s training, was dropped in Afgan in the middle of the night, stormed in Bin’s crib and took the target out. Just like when Air Force1 flew out to snipe the Somalian pirates. COME ON.
PEOPLE. He answered the phone and said “OK”. Thats IT. Give credit to our men and women in uniform who make the real sacrifices.
How the heck does this idiot know what someone else would do as president? What a joke.
Report Post »Bluefish49
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 5:23pmReally David? He should not have been killed anyway. He should be rotting at Guantanamo jail cell with daily water boarding.
Report Post »CobraBill
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 5:23pmOh bullcrap.
Report Post »M1A2_Tanker
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 8:28pmLet me get this straight…..Ax-hole-rod is calling Romney a coward? Wow this Regime really is backwards! Folks they are not using weapons such as guns/knives YET but they are definitely waging war against our freedom. I believe the time for the blood of tyrants, flowing in the streets is drawing nearer with each passing moment.
“This we’ll defend!”
Report Post »pcnav
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 10:06pmAnother Cerebral Paul-sy sufferer.
Report Post »garbagecanlogic
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 12:16amWe would not have had any troops or military hardware to send overseas in the first place if senile ronny had been prez. Pull up you little girl panties and go back to playing video games.
The U.S. Out Of The U.N.
Report Post »The U.N. Out Of The U.S.
Cat
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:28amKeep talking Axelrod; you’re awakening more and more of us with each and every pile of bull crap you eject from your mouth.
Report Post »Moron …
Vechorik
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 8:18amObama didn’t make the decision!
After 9/11 Congress couldn’t decide WHAT COUNTRY to declare war upon.
Ron Paul proposed the following — everyone voted for it and Osama should have been history SOONER!
There were “political reasons” Obama was killed WHEN he was — matter of timing.
-
Ron Paul’s War:
Dr. Paul supports using “letters of marque and reprisal.”
These are, in effect, licenses to private parties to carry out acts of war. We used them against the Barbary pirates. Almost immediately after the attack on the World Trade Center, Dr. Paul introduced in the 107th Congress H.R. 2076, called the September 11 Marque and Reprisal Act of 2001, authorizing holders of the letters to go after bin Laden and other Al Qaeda leaders and seize them and their property. He also voted to give President Bush authority to use the military to go after Al Qaeda, but he has been pressing for letters of marque ever since.
Dr. Paul’s bill would have covered not only past attacks but any “planned future air piratical aggressions and depredations” against us. It would have given the president discretion to pay up to $40 billion in what were, in effect, bounties for the “capture, alive or dead, of Osama bin Laden or any other al Qaeda conspirator responsible for the act of air piracy upon the United States on September 11, 2001.”
Dr. Paul said that one thing he wanted as to avoid a trillion dollar expedition when there was a simpler, constitutional approach
Report Post »Buck Shane
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 11:03amDivid Axelrod
Report Post »Any of us would have made that decision. That your guy thinks it was difficult shows his nature. Its why we want him out.
Cynic-clinic
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 11:28amThe headline, I’m Not Sure Mitt Romney Would Have Made That Decision’ to Kill Bin Laden .
I‘m certain that Obama didn’t make it either. And, it wasn’t on his teleprompter.
Report Post »EastTexas
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:48pmYea, and if frogs had wings they wouldn’t bump their butts when they jump.
Report Post »oldoldtimer
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 4:49pmHard decision? hardly. it was for Obama because he puts every thing into the context will it help or hurt my reelection so I can finsh the destruction of the US for my master Soros.
Report Post »larrylarrylarry
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:00pmI doubt Romney would kill Bin Laden also. Probably Bush didn’t hunt him down since he is good friends with the Bin Laden family.
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:16pmNWO boys stick together like fleas on kitty..
Report Post »barber2
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:17pmHey, Larry: say “ hi ” to Moe and Curly…
Report Post »Drakkhanlord
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:24pmBarber ,
Please do not INSULT the MASTERS…
The Stooges were the MASTERS of their CRAFT…
Report Post »hazmat_factor
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 5:11pm@ drakkenlord
Amen!
Report Post »barber2
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 7:31pmDRAK: I apologize!
Report Post »rclay36
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:00pmHey AX any two pit idiot would make that decision to kill Obama. If we were following Obama’s interrogation policy at the time we would have never gotten the key piece of info that led us to Osama! Your man has not backbone! His foreign policy is a disaster and we will be paying for it like we had to pay for Carters poor judgment or lack of judgment for decades to come.
Ya you run on that and see what Mitt does to your man!
Rick Clay
Report Post »304-550-7970
Steelhead
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:07pmkill who? careful now mr clay
Report Post »kellied
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 5:01pmHAHA! LOVE IT WHEN YALL MAKE ME LAUGH! that phone# and the Obama thing. Yeah Yeah Obama is a real KILLER——-OF FREEDOM that is.
Report Post »veteran2
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 1:56pmold dick head is spewing lies again,because he comes from Chicago, the culture of democratis corruption.
Report Post »jakartaman
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:59pmNiether did Barry – He was forced into it after a few months of pondering!!
Report Post »Yes Mitt would have killed Osama – if that’s all the big strategist on the left can come up with – wow
Barry is bye bye
Zipit
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:27pmExactly! It came to the point where to many people knew where Bin Laden was. Someone had to convince BO that if he didn’t pull the trigger and ubl got away, we would have found out about it and his political career would have been over. And by the way, every time I see Axelrod speak,(about anything), I feel smarter!
Report Post »stanishr
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:44pmAgreed, taking months to decide to act on the #1 terrorist was courageous???? What a wimp. Probably had to get Michele’s ok and had to figure out how he could blame Bush.
Report Post »Tusker
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 5:20pmThank you for posting that jakartaman! The truth on who specifically gave the order will never come out in msm. But Bari Shabazz was not the one! I have no idea why this is even an issue.
Report Post »Sealwifeinnyc
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 2:28amI just had to comment on this, all politics and ideology aside, this is a much more complicated issue than you guys seem to realize. First off, intelligence (CIA) had to follow activity in that house for an extended period of time, OBL was not exactly walking the dog down the block. They had to develop satellite methods to verify who was in the house. Once they were relatively sure it was him, the Seals built an identical structure and began developing various plans. The Seals plan for every situation, so this takes time. Approval goes through the chain, Gates (NOT Panetta) would get approval from the President. The reason this was a courageous decision was for various reasons, As They didn’t find him hiding in a hole as was the case with Saddam. They were not 100% it was actually him, the possibility of raiding a home in Pakistan and it not be OBL is disastrous. It could be seen as an act of aggression, if he was in a nearby location he would vacate right away, losing him again. They would be flying in to Pakistan, a country that is hostile and using their air space is prohibited. Pakistan does have a sophisticated military so there is a chance they would be detected. The SEALs have no air support or ground support, they could have easily been involved in a lengthy fire fight. Plainly speaking the chances for the SEALs being killed or captured were extremely high. Much higher than typical. My husband is a SEAL, so if you want to call me names feel free.
Report Post »jasmer
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 7:41am@Sealwife – yes, ops like this are complex. That doesn’t mean they take six months to make a decision to execute; on the contrary, the intel is likely to go stale.
Axlerod’s just re-spouting the “tough call” talking point in preparation for the election, using the strawman that anyone with a shred of patriotism would have had doubts.
America – no worse friend, no better enemy. At least until the end of 2012.
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:58pmromneycon would have checked with the bilderberg group first to see if it was in the best interest of the New World Order and his banker campaign donors.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:23pmThink you are working a tad overtime on this Ron Paul campaign…or are you a Lefty Troll ? Can’t tell the difference…also whenever you guys choose these “conservative” tag names, it sort of outs you…the more right wing the name/ the more Left wing the comments .
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:40pm@spooky
Report Post »I desire the U.S.A to be what it was supposed to be, not a police state, nwo, constitution hating place like you inbreds want…to hell with you and the progressive establishment! I’d love to shove the Constitution down your American hating throat…Oh sorry, I forgot, You neocons hate violence unless it’s in the form of bombing innocent people in other countries.
MCDAVE
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 8:06pmTHE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE …Not many people will understand what you are talking about when you refer to the Bilderburg group and NWO….Or the very real threat they pose to our country..I can see you are well informed
Report Post »TheBurningTruth
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:56pmI don’t ever remember such grade-school playground taunts from ANY administration in the last 40 years I’ve been politically aware. There’s always some jabbing back and forth, but the degree these thugs in this administration have taken it is just amazing. Soon we’ll hear about “your mother wears Army boots!” from these clowns.
I guess that‘s what one does when they can’t talk about the real issues like unemployment, the debt/deficit and foreign policy.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:03pmLow class Chicago …
Report Post »audiemurphy
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 6:07pmaxelrods comments are not meant for the informed …..
Report Post »they are meant for the sheeple who line up for Obama money and the already sold to the left supporters who cheerlead any dumbass comment they spew!
If the uninformed Obama money seekers and minority voters out number the informed at the polls they win and Obama is crowned for four more years.
I think by then there will be so much strife in America between the occupy and crazy far right that Obama will turn everything upside down and I would be surprised if he gets another four after he changes the constitution. Remember he WANTS to appear as Americas Saviour so he can do ANYTHING he wants!
Chuck Stein
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 10:51pmAgreed — the current administration is constantly setting new lows in all metrics of good government.
Report Post »sb36695
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:52pmIt’s the economy, stupid!
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:55pmAnd the ungodly endless wars that are bankrupting us for corporation profit.
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:01pmYou do realize the war was the only thing keeping us form a even worse depression than the one we are in right? Oops, I guess you don’t.
Report Post »SEPARATENOW
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 5:10pm@TRUTH
How far does one have to go back in their conservatism to not be a neo-con? Or does it just suit you to call anyone who disagrees and is conservative a neo-con? I was reading and watching Bill Buckley at 16, 36 years ago. Far enough? I’d bomb the sh&& out of anyone threatening the US with any credibility. Making more terrorists? No problem. Drop a few more. They can go ahead and kiss the virgins. It is a religious war and always has been.
In the mean time, I wish Occupy would come to your town so you could camp out with your kind, the loons.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 7:28pmThe Truth: ‘the endless wars for corporate profit”…sounds like the comments that the Lefties post in their progressives mouth piece, The New York Times. What a bunch of hooey. Just like the 99% baloney we get from the Lefties in the White House and the Occupiers.
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 9:31pm@barber
Report Post »I don’t care what “ it sounds like ” the point is that it is the TRUTH.. Haliburton, Big Oil , GE, And many others are getting filthy rich dropping bombs and killing “terrorists”.
GUNNSUP
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:52pmI still do NOT believe this story. No photo of the body as had been the case with other terror suspects our forces had either killed or captured. Regardless, obama had nothing to do with the SEAL unit gathering ther intel necessary to locate him. I’m sure Gen Petreaus & CIA made the decision if in fact the strike was carried out. US Forces just doing thier jobs. Bin laden had been dead for many years from kidney failure.
From my sources affiliated with the USS Carl Vinson, this has been the biggest hoax ever concocted for obama political brownie points.
Axledouche can assume all he wants about what Romney may or may not do, he is a lying, kanniaving, manipulating, piece of dung….
Report Post »cosette
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:12pmI’m right there with you. I believe nothing that comes out of the mouth of that liar in the white house or his minions. Comrad Obozo is working feverishly to destroy this country and is
Report Post »ratcheting up the pace in order to do as much damage as possible in the little (God help us) time he has left. I pray on a daily basis that he is expelled from that office by whatever means, it matters not to me how. Good lord make it stop!
Vickie Dhaene
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:35pmI am in agreement with you. Don’t believe a thing this administration and previous has been saying is the truth. The truth is that it is murder to kill another man for political gain and to brag about it like some erroneous king wanna be is insulting to my intelligence and I am pretty naive when it comes right down to it. I will not be fooled by evil forces and intentions.
Report Post »stanishr
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:53pmIt’s obvious truthfulness is not a value un the white house, The story had so many jogs, it mad a soap opera look simple. The secret sea burial to keep the Islamic tradition intact was a nice touch. Hope OBL is enjoying his 72 virgins. They really know how to handle the enemy.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 5:36pmAgree with you. The only thing we know for sure is that the bastard in chief and all his followers have been and will continue to use it to make little barrie look like a big hero, strong leader – what a joke.
Report Post »f2345ranky
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:51pmI was surprised that Obama gave the order to kill Obama given it would be going against his Muslim, I mean his Christian faith. Wasn’t it Stephanopolous that corrected him on that last time. Everytime
Report Post »Axelrod speaks. He speaks BS. I live in Chicago and Axelrod’s been doing this at least 20 years.
CatB
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:02pmYes it was Stephy .. of last nights worse (boring “got ya questions) debate ever! Obama didn’t even catch himself .. Stephy had to.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMUgNg7aD8M
Report Post »GREENDOG
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:51pmIt is going to be funny when barry loses and all these rats start jumping off the ship. Then we will get the book from this little weasel/hack how bad a President little barry was!
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:54pmBarry will only lose to Ron Paul…the rest of the progressives give him a gauranteed 4 more.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:50pmSo Bob Gates supposedly said that the killing of Osama was the ” most courageous decision he’s seen a president make in his 30 years in Washington.” What a ridiculous statement. The death of Bin Laden was our biggest goal for years. Just another Big Lie from the 99% Baloney Obama Administration.
Report Post »Robert-CA
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:48pmWell next time when you’re not sure of something just shut up .
Report Post »hempstead1944
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:47pmOnly one man knows what Mitt Romney would have done and it certainly isn’t Axelrod.
Report Post »Mandors
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:47pmI’m quite confident that the total amount of things Axelrod is “not sure about” would not be a finite number.
Report Post »charles4227
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:46pmObama said yes, so he could take the credit, and spike the ball!!!
Report Post »MeteoricLimbo
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:46pmif if if..
Report Post »If my aunt had testicles she would be my uncle if she weren’t my aunt. So whats the point
disenlightened
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:45pmThis is what they have to run on – they had a man killed. This hack, circa-1930′s, Chicago commie with a pathetic comb-over, double chin and a fat belly has but one accomplishment to brag about – they gave the order to have conservative soldiers kill a man.
Report Post »doxyonr
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:49pmAbsolutely right.
Report Post »Sealwifeinnyc
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 2:59amThat is actually entirely untrue. My husband is a SEAL and I am far more conservative than he and and a lot of his teammates are. Bush’s military policy was a disaster, especially to people on the ground. My husband believes in the goodness of America and that able bodied males have a responsibility to fight for their country during wartime. That does not automatically make him a conservative, assuming you know their ideology makes you ignorant.
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:44pmOf course he wouldn’t Obama ordered a murder of a foreign leader, a real leader would have had him brought in alive rather than shot in the back.
Report Post »dealer@678
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:57pmIm not sure if Romney would make the decision to dump Israel in the grease like Obama did
Report Post »Phoneguy
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:42pmWhat is AMAZING is that Backo did, or did he? Mitt, dirtbag as he is, has killed him in his sleep!
Report Post »CatB
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:42pmGive me a d*mn break … I understand Obama procrastinated right up until the time it would have been a no go … any of the R’s would have had no problem with that decision .. except perhaps Ron Paul .. now he I am not certain of .. Romney, Newt, Santorum, Perry .. .no doubt.
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:53pm@kitty,
Report Post »If Ron Paul had been president we wouldn’t have had osama bin laden in the first place, Osama attacked us because of our invasion and occupying THEIR countries..but mental midgets like yoy can’t grasp even the simplest of concepts and facts…
justangry
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:02pmLOL I was wondering if someone would be able to fit an anti Paul zinger into this narrative.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:06pmLOL … rolling lol lol lol .. so funny oh and the calling of names by Paul and his supporters .. is funny too!
According to Ron Paul, in order to stop terrible oppressors like China from killing 100 million more of their own people, we need to play ping pong.
According to Ron Paul, if you intend to save the country and be credited with bringing it back to a Constitutional Republic, vote for only a few appropriation bills in 24 years, and earmark every nickel for the 14th District of Texas, that way, you are not spending money on frivolous things like the rest of the country.
According to Ron Paul, one must agree with the decision of Roe v. Wade because of the Constitutional right to privacy in the 4th amendment, but constantly proclaim you are pro-life.
According to Ron Paul, a “little bit of a difference” in foreign policy is stopping military support of Israel, since they are an illegitimate country in the first place, and that Israel is holding the Hamas-controlled Gaza strip as Hilter held the Jews in a concentration camp. Incidentally, Paul called Israel a “national socialist state” in his newsletters that he signed in 1987.
According to Ron Paul, not ruling out going third party is simply a reserve of judgement, since he is not sure yet how the primary race will pan out.
According to Ron Paul, Hamas is legitimate, and the Palestinians got ripped off, and cannot be the aggressors in the Middle East because they don’t have the power, and that
Report Post »CatB
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:10pmOh and this ….
http://biggovernment.com/tloudon/2012/01/08/blinded-by-the-left-how-marxists-wrote-ron-pauls-defense-cuts-plan/?utm_source=like&utm_campaign=ingboo
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:13pm@kitty
Report Post »How funny you are, I take it you couldn’t get people to go to your regurgitated msm talking point link..so you type It for all to see..lol..It doesn‘t change the fact it’s still opinions and not facts. keep trying though..your iq is stuck in 1st gear…
CatB
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:13pmcontinues … from my second post…..
US support for Israel is blind.
According to Ron Paul, the war on drugs must end with the legalization of all vice laws, because vice laws take away individual freedom to do what you wish, harming no one but yourself and your property. Not once has he suggested how to deal with the domestic violence and death associated with someone supposedly just harming himself.
Sewn up in a package as the potential leader of our nation, Ron Paul offers appeasement, self-absorption, incorrect and convenient reading of the Constitution, anti-Semitism, the idea that if he’s not the nominee, America deserves another 4 years of Obama, and absolute blindness of the people hurt by rampant drug use.
Given that package, Ron Paul is not really that much different than President Obama.
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:26pm@kitty
Report Post »you must be inbred….
justangry
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 5:02pmChill out CatB. I didn’t call you a name. The worst name I’ve used was “troll”, and some sarcastic swipes here and there. In retrospect, it was in poor taste, but you’re not being honest if you won’t admit that personal attacks are flying from all sides on this site. Furthermore lumping all of Ron Paul’s supporters into a group is collectivism, is it not?
Report Post »SEPARATENOW
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 5:14pm@TRUTH
Report Post »Bugger off tosser. I don’t want you to vote for any other candidate. In my country, you get deported for being a ‘tard.
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 6:54pmOf course we know Ron Paul wouldn’t have had OBL killed, because RP and OBL often said pretty much the same thing about America. Blood is thick between those on the fringes.
Report Post »Sr Newk
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:41pmCan anyone really take this guy serious? Heck yes Romney would take him out, at least I would think anyone with a right mind and even Obama for this particular situation decided to take him out. The person Axel Rod needs to needle on courage is Bill Clinton. At least I’ve heard that he himself had the chance to take out Osama bin Laden some time ago when he was President and he made the decision not to carry through with the kill.
Report Post »NOBALONEY
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:41pmWhat rock did Axelrod crawl out from under?
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 8:54amLike making the decision to kill Bin Laden was hard from a few thousand miles away? On what planet is that a hard decision?
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:40pmObama admitted himself on national TV that he knew where Binladden was for over 10 months before striking him. I think the decision came after Osama was insulting Obama publically.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:43pmLittle too early to be rewriting history .. isn’t it!!
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:40pm???. Sorry that is a Fact. Sorry punk.
Report Post »Obama’s own words in explaining the mission said they trained for months starting the summer before. Do you just choose not to remember, a liar or just accidentally jumped to a false conclusion?
13th Imam
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:37pmWould Bill Clinton make the decision to kill Bin Laden??
NO,,, , No ,, NO
He was too busy getting Lewinsky’s.
Report Post »GeorgieJo
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:57pmYemen and USS Cole should be written on Clinton’s forehead.
Report Post »drattastic
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:36pmOh Please give me a damn break ! Go back to being Soros’ footstool ,marxist stooge and Hitler look alike.
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:42pmWow, he does look like Hitler. Is that what gives me the creepy chills about him? I honestly never put that together.
Report Post »drattastic
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 7:01pmI wish that was all that creeped me out about that schmuck.
Report Post »