Faith

David Barton Is Today’s #1 Google Trend After Talking About Religious Freedom on ‘The Daily Show’

Conservative historian David Barton, a knowledgeable source when it comes to understanding America’s faith roots, is a frequent guest on GBTV. And today, Barton became the number one trending topic on Google. The astounding accomplishment, CNN’s Belief Blog reports, came after the historian‘s Tuesday evening appearance on Jon Stewart’s “The Daily Show.”

David Barton Appears on The Daily Show & Becomes Google Trend

A screen shot showing David Barton's placement on the Google trends list

Barton has been an advocate for the notion that Christianity was at the root of the nation’s founding and that the faith system has played a key role in shaping American history. This detail, he argues, has been removed from history books and is not discussed adequately in classrooms. His organization, WallBuilders, is focused on promoting this long-lost history and defending the nation’s Christian heritage.

(Related: Do You Know the Real Story Behind the ‘Jefferson Bible’? DavidBarton Shared it With Beck)

Barton’s new book, “The Jefferson Lies: Exposing the Myths You’ve Always Believed About Thomas Jefferson,” delves into the issue of whether Thomas Jefferson was, indeed, secular — or religious. The popular evangelical historian tries, throughout the text, to refute the notion that he was an anti-theist politician. Recently, Barton appeared on GBTV, where he told Glenn Beck that the history of the Jefferson Bible has been twisted.

David Barton Appears on The Daily Show & Becomes Google Trend

Naturally, the evangelical leader is not without his critics. On Tuesday evening, as noted, he made yet another appearance (yes, he’s been on before) on “The Daily Show,” where he discussed faith in America.

“You are prolific as always,” Stewart said, as he began his discussion with Barton. The two spent the first portion of the interview discussing misconceptions surrounding Jefferson.

“The biggest feeling — that he was an atheist or a secularist. He just wasn’t. He was a religious guy,” Barton said. “His activities, his actions, his givings, his money — now he had some comments that you could take out of context…but when you look at hundreds of his letters, you just don‘t get the sense that he’s an atheist.”

Watch the first part of the interview, below:

In the second part of the chat, Barton and Stewart discuss — and debate — religious freedom issues in America:

In part three, they delve into the controversial themes surrounding the contraceptive mandate:

Comments (233)

1 2 3 4
  • timeout
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:18pm

    Barton is a walking, talking, breathing asset for our country. Thank God he (Barton) is bold, and unafraid.

    Report Post »  
    • GENEPAGLIARI
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:26pm

      Separation of church and state is a myth. No where in our Constitution are those words or that idea promulgated. The clause is clearly intended to keep the government from establishing a state church such as the Pilgrams fled when they left England.

      Report Post »  
    • Bearfoot
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:49pm

      Both Stewart and Barton has no idea of what Jehovah’s Witnesses believe and by making false statements about them is disappointing. If anyone makes a statement about any group and it is false, makes the speaker look foolish.

      Report Post » Bearfoot  
    • cessna152
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:53pm

      @gene,

      Exactly.. and Americans [really] aren’t buying into the BS “separation of C&S” anymore. They have researched it, just as they have researched the 2nd amendment, the 1A and the entire Bill of Rights. USA citizens are waking up to the tactics of the left…I am one of those late sleepers that woke up in 2007 to local issues then 2009 national issues.

      BTW, don’t believe these polls for Hussein. I honestly believe he is in the low 20′s(%)….

      Report Post » cessna152  
    • Tom K
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:00pm

      @ GENEPAGLIARI: I argued this point at a Constitutional Law class at a local Law Enforcement Acdemy. The other student kept chanting “ seperation of church and state ” and since she had a degree in Criminal Justice, she supposed I did not know what I was talking about. I stood and challenged her saying; “ If you can find ” seperation of church and state ” in the U.S. Constitution before the end of the week on Friday, I will buy you a car – not more than $20,000 ! The classroom was real quiet. She studied all week long and could not find what her college professors had planted into her head. I accepted her apology and we are friends. Stand up America !

      Report Post »  
    • Bearfoot
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:04pm

      The false statements were made in video Part 3 starting at 4:15

      Report Post » Bearfoot  
    • Old Truckers
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:55pm

      BearFoot,

      I agree, too many people make uneducated statements based on what their uncle Rufus said and not on accurate knowledge of the subject at hand. I know for a fact that JW’s do go to doctors for their maladies. David Barton may know about history but not about JW’s. And Mr. Stewart; well, he is just an entertainer.

      Report Post » Old Truckers  
    • okfoz
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 5:04pm

      Bearfoot,
      If you watch again, David Barton after he said “Jehovah Witness”, shook his head and said “Christian Scientist” to correct himself. Stewart ran with the Jehovah Witness thing… So it was simply a mistake which Barton quickly corrected himself.

      Report Post »  
    • Bearfoot
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 5:25pm

      okfoz,

      Point taken, thanks for the correction.

      Report Post » Bearfoot  
    • tommyb89
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 5:28pm

      @Bearfoot

      Barton corrected himself right away. He only has so much time on the show so instead of wasting his time correcting Stewart he let it go.

      Report Post » tommyb89  
    • Bearfoot
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 6:05pm

      After reviewing the video, I need to apologise to Mr. David Barton and to you who came to his defence.

      Report Post » Bearfoot  
    • db321
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 6:28pm

      I heard “The Mr. Barton” Speak 18 years ago – he was the 1st Human Being to ever tell me that – no where in the Constitution is their the wording “Separation of Church and State.” This man is definably anointed by God and his message is getting heard.

      Then I watched David Barton become one of Glenn favorite guest and trusted confidant.

      Tell me God is not present in America – God is alive and well and he has every Angel standing watch over us – Thank God tonight for David, Glenn and everyone that is keeping the flame of truth glowing throughout all America. Thank you Lord – God Bless Israel – God Bless America

      Don’t Forget – Tomorrow is the National Day of Prayer – Obama’s trying to keep it quiet – I’m not!

      Report Post » db321  
    • StatenJM
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 6:34pm

      @BearFoot

      David Barton said Jehovah Witnesses by accident then said Creation Scientist (the ones who don’t believe in modern medicine), but Mr. Stewart kept with Jehovah Witnesses…really though it doesn’t make any difference because that is not what the focus of the conversation was about.

      Report Post » StatenJM  
    • drphil69
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 6:37pm

      @OldTrucker – My Uncle Rufus is a genius, how dare you disparage him!

      LOL.

      Report Post »  
    • mike_trivisonno
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 6:43pm

      David Barton is amazing. I applaud him for going into the den of filth that is The John Stewart Show. Hopefully he woke up a few more Americans.

      Report Post » mike_trivisonno  
    • 4truth2all
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 6:50pm

      Yo Bearfoot:

      An apology … a rare thing … thankyou, even if it has nothing to do with me …

      Report Post »  
    • 4truth2all
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:02pm

      Yo Cessnia152:

      Concerning the poll numbers … my thinking also … makes it easier to STEAL the election if people already think he is that close.

      Report Post »  
    • AirMotor
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:47pm

      You hit the nail on the head!!! He is a genius also!!!

      Report Post » AirMotor  
    • dontbotherme
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 9:15pm

      Bearfoot: Class act. You are a good man.

      Report Post »  
    • ModerationIsBest
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 10:45pm

      Very good interview. Both had some interesting points.

      Report Post »  
    • Shiroi Raion
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 11:14pm

      Congratulations, David, and thank you for standing up against the Progressives’ lies and restoring truth!

      Report Post » Shiroi Raion  
    • pwatkins
      Posted on May 3, 2012 at 12:15am

      Most Jehovah Witnesses don’t know what they believe either, bc I have talked in depth with a few. They have no education in theology whatsoever…just a group of people that get together in what they call a Bible study class and decide what they read and understand is truth, but they are way off base. All of the scriptures they go by are taken out of context. According to them they are chosen above all mankind.
      Barton is a thorough man and I trust his conceptions on what he says to be true.

      Report Post »  
    • CA_Refugee
      Posted on May 3, 2012 at 12:16am

      The most misunderstood thing about the “separation of church and state” ie the Danbury Baptist letter was that it was written to Baptists who were suffering persecution at the time by government…Baptists at the time were outcasts, Jefferson was acknowledging their persecution and suggesting the recourse in which they could worship freely…oye…how far the apple has fallen from the tree. Barton is the man to fix that…

      Report Post »  
    • RushEcho2
      Posted on May 3, 2012 at 1:29am

      From Amazon, I was browsing and bought four David Barton books, averaging $7 and one of them for $3. They look great!

      Report Post » RushEcho2  
    • Diane TX
      Posted on May 3, 2012 at 4:42am

      @ GENEPAGLIARI,

      You’re 100% correct! There isn’t any such thing as freedom FROM religion. The Constitution clearly states that the government CAN NOT establish a government religion. David Barton is also 100% correct. Our forefathers, who brought about the United States of America, were all believers in Jesus Christ.

      Report Post »  
    • jblaze
      Posted on May 3, 2012 at 1:41pm

      David Barton for President.

      Report Post » jblaze  
    • zero_out
      Posted on May 3, 2012 at 3:11pm

      @ StatenJM
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 6:34pm
      “David Barton said Jehovah Witnesses by accident then said Creation Scientist” Did not say “Creation Scientist”. He named a I which calls itself “Christian Science”.

      Report Post »  
    • binge_thinker
      Posted on May 3, 2012 at 5:11pm

      When this Nation was founded 98% were Protestant Christians, 1% were Catholics, and less than 1% were atheists, theists or Jews. This was and is a Christian Nation. It was not the Buddhists, Muslims or Jews who instituted the greatest Government in the World, it was the Protestant Christians! It was Christian principles, values, morality, religion and charity that made this country the most prosperous and well Governed Nation in the whole history of Mankind. It was a belief in the Almighty and acknowledgement in his sovereign authority over our Nation that afforded us the most Liberty in our societies and most religious tolerance ever allowed by a body of elected Representatives. Our form of Government and our Constitution all bear inspiration from the great precepts of the Bible, wherein all men are created equal and endowed with unalienable Rights.

      David Barton is a patriot and a staunch defender of truth.
      God Bless you, David.

      Report Post » binge_thinker  
    • Mighty an
      Posted on May 4, 2012 at 9:27pm

      Some one needs to tell that Jack Ass, Reverend Jim Wallace Obamas so called spiritual advisor. That less than 30 years ago Public Law 97-280 was passed by both the House and the Senate declaring 1983 as the year. Of the Bible, and that the Bible is the Word of God. Sad how we have gone from a God fearing nation to a bunch of Haethens. 2nd Chronicles 7:14. Repent or Parish!
      Gideonelite

      Report Post »  
  • cassandra
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:11pm

    I have read every one of David Barton‘s book’s but America in Black and White , and Separation of Church and State is what they should teach in school

    Report Post »  
    • Zoe
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:31pm

      Been following Wallbuilders for nearly 20 years……..have linked our business to their website for nearly 15.

      Some things ARE important.

      Report Post » Zoe  
    • AngelAuthor
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:29pm

      America in Black and White is an awesome book, but I suggest you hide any dangerous objects before you read it, as it really made me mad. Opened my eyes to the evil of the Democrat party and its origins.

      Report Post »  
    • chazmo
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 5:57pm

      5000 Year Leap.

      Report Post » chazmo  
    • elation
      Posted on May 3, 2012 at 8:09am

      What? Separation of Church and State is what they should teach in school? They already do, and it’s WRONG! I hope you just made a typo or left out a word. Please explain yourself.

      Report Post »  
  • Truth1776
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:10pm

    Hoorah for David Barton!

    Wish we had a million or two more like him teaching in our schools!

    Report Post » Truth1776  
  • hillbillyinny
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:06pm

    Thankyou David, but thankyou also Jon Stewart, “Christianity seems pretty safe in this country, and pretty ubiquitous. . . ). In other words, Stewart was asking why Christians would be being “attacked” as they are not a problem in the U.S.!

    For the other side of this disuccsion see this angry article in HuffPo: “Pseudo-Historian David Barton’s New Jefferson Book is a Load of Crap — and a Bestseller” at

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-rodda/pseudohistorian-david-bar_b_1471634.html

    or visit the article author’s website and get an “eyeful” at

    http://www.liarsforjesus.com/

    or the same author’s persistent hawking of her site and book as a supposed one-star “review” of Barton’s book at the Amazon website at

    http://www.amazon.com/The-Jefferson-Lies-Exposing-Believed/product-reviews/1595554599/ref=cm_cr_dp_hist_one?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=0&filterBy=addOneStar

    It‘s interesting how much anger can spill out with some people’s words. . .

    (P.S. On the same website, this same author reviews several of Glenn’s contributions and critiques them too–passionately!)

    Report Post »  
    • encinom
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:33pm

      All of this proves that the Psuedo Historian Barton and Beck are out to scam their mindless followers to part with their money for a collection of half truths and lies.

      Report Post »  
    • hillbillyinny
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:36pm

      If you want to see the “free thinking” author, Rodda, do her presentation against Barton’s book, this is also available–I think it speaks for itself:

      http://freethoughtblogs.com/rodda/2012/04/02/starting-to-debunk-david-bartons-new-book-the-jefferson-lies/

      What is “free thought”? Definition, Merriam-Webster: “one who forms opinions on the basis of reason independently of authority; especially : one who doubts or denies religious dogma”

      (Commenter “Enicom” might be one of these.)

      All of this is presented in the spirit of “Know thy enemy”!

      Interesting, I was in school in the early 1950′s. Much of what we learned is as Barton presents, not as it is being put forward today, don’t know exactly what the solution is, but thank you David Barton!

      Good luck all!

      Report Post »  
    • jpclarksville
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:36pm

      What is scary is that this woman is the senior research director at the Military Religious Freedom Foundation.

      Report Post »  
    • 4truth2all
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 6:45pm

      Yo Encinom:

      Letters = a persons OWN thoughts written down for others to understand… Barton has made the time and effort to do such and thus protect others from the outright lies others are teaching, and the reason for the book , but then you do seem to have a problem with truth.

      Report Post »  
    • kcinco
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 10:45pm

      It really pains me to listen to someone so angry and hateful and close-minded.

      Report Post » kcinco  
    • RJJinGadsden
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 11:44pm

      ENCINOM(AN) I have a simple solution for you to prove yourself correct. Check your local library to see first if they have this book and if now if, or when it might be expected. Certainly wouldn’t suggest to you to purchase the thing. You don’t even have to read the whole book, but rather look for the letters or any footnotes where the letters or parts of them have been installed in regular print. Then Google each letter as listed in the footnote and simply verify word for word if the book is correct or not. Should you find a mistake, a misquote, or even an out right lie, then come back and sling all of the mud that you want. I do get the feeling that if you did this and found it to be correct we’ll never read a word of that here from you. Take the challenge if you dare, give it an hour every so often when you get the chance.

      Report Post » RJJinGadsden  
    • chalkdust
      Posted on May 3, 2012 at 2:26am

      RJJinGadsden
      Encino man is trolling you. Calls you names and makes claims without substantiation. Not worth trying to debate. It’s like talking to a dog, all they hear is, blah blah bluh Spot, blah blah blah bluh sit Spot!

      Barton stands far above the mindless barking from trolls.

      Sit Ubu Sit, good dog.

      Report Post » chalkdust  
  • stage9
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:03pm

    There are consequences to acknowledging God in history and science and atheists know this…meaning an atheist wants to find truth about as much as a thief wants to find a policeman.

    Report Post » stage9  
  • John1863
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:53pm

    Wow do the leftist Atheists get upset when they have their little bubbles burst by someone who actually understands the place religion holds in the founding of this country. Notice how they start with the he‘s a liar and a fraud but can’t explain why. Notice that Encinom has once again showed his ignorance and there is nothing wrong with being ignorant since it’s just a lack of knowledge but you would think he would want to learn something on his own instead of being lead around by his hand by people who will tell you they care about you right before they throw you under the bus, ie liberals. As someone who has seen plenty of people die because of my line of work I find it interesting that I have not met an atheist who doesn’t beg God not to die when the time comes.

    Report Post »  
    • Al J Zira
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:40pm

      encinom: This is typical of you and your type. The man has hand written letters from Thomas Jefferson. He’s studied the guy six ways to Sunday but like your group does with the constitution you twist and manipulate the text to fit your agenda. Facts are facts and because someone says that Jefferson was secular doesn’t make it true. This propaganda has been perpetuated in schools for too long and now that someone comes out with facts from Jefferson’s written word, you want to ignore the facts and run with your lies. Let me ask you something. Have you read all of Jefferson’s letters to determine that he was secular? I doubt it. Your information comes from someone else’s interpretation and without reason you take that as bible. Sad. Really sad.

      Report Post » Al J Zira  
    • BrokenArrow1327
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:53pm

      “It would give you a fever were I to name to you the apostates who have gone over to these heresies, men who were Samsons in the field and Solomons in the council, but who have had their heads shorn by the harlot England.” in letter from Thomas Jefferson to Philip Mazzei, Monticello Apr. 24. 1796

      For a man that people keep claiming was anti-religion, he seems to show a very acute understanding of it’s text. Jefferson was a very religious man and if you go read any of his writings you would see it for yourself. Always seek truth, find it in a mans own words and deeds.

      Report Post »  
    • colt1860
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 6:11pm

      @brokenarrow You’re right. Jefferson said, in his famous “separation between church and state” letter,

      “I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection & blessing of the common father and creator of man, and tender you for yourselves & your religious association, assurances of my high respect & esteem.”

      Plus, Jefferson said CHURCH and State, not religion and State. The Constitution also does not say “religion”, it says, ESTABLISHMENT of Religion. Also, take into consideration that ALL FIFTY state constitutions make reference to God in their preamble, acknowledge that our civil and religious liberties are blessings from the Almighty, and not from men. In addition, the Northwest Ordinance, passed in 1789 by Congress, said, “And, for extending the fundamental principles of civil and religious liberty, which form the basis whereon these republics, their laws and constitutions are erected; to fix and establish those principles as the basis of all laws, constitutions, and governments, which forever hereafter shall be formed in the said territory… Religion, morality, and knowledge, BEING NECESSARY to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged.”

      Report Post »  
  • Carol1955
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:52pm

    Barton is amazing. Many groups are using his Heritage Series for Sunday School lessons or Bible Studies. He is fascinating. We’re almost through the first series and I have the Building on the American Heritage Series waiting.

    Report Post »  
  • Meyvn
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:49pm

    Kudos to David.

    Report Post » Meyvn  
  • armyofnibiru
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:46pm

    (congress SHALL make no law respecting an establishment of religion;“part 1”or prohibiting the FREE exercize there of;“part 2”) so pickinng up a child by the scruff of the neck and saying no praying here.is not only an assault on the child ,but a violation of the constitutions 2cnd reiligious clause.and a dangerous thing to do to my child if i weren’t christian.they always violate the second clause to shove the first clause(wrongfully) down our throughts.and note to seclurist the bases of our laws based on the 10 comandments of the (tora and bible)not marx nor moa,or mohahameds little reds books.

    Report Post »  
  • skiz
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:38pm

    David is one of the “NEW FOUNDERS” and I thank God for him everyday!
    He makes these progressive punks look like chumps.

    Report Post » skiz  
    • liberty_for_all
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:49pm

      I’m surprised the discussion went as “well” as it did, considering that Jon Stewart was clearly trying to undermine Barton‘s view with his devil’s advocacy. I don’t like that he (Stewart) used the example of an employer who doesnt believe in health insurance having to provide health insurance for an employee who does. Thats not what the system is all about.

      Report Post »  
    • CA_Refugee
      Posted on May 3, 2012 at 12:49am

      Yeah…Barton really failed a simple test here, I think he was just being polite…but its simply labor law. A job description is written…you do this work I described for a “glass of sand”. Then you do the work and ask for a “pair of sunglasses” and I say sorry this was the arrangement, then you go to the government to sue and ask for help…un-freaking believable…it the slut wanted BC she should’ve gone to Vegas and studied to be a stripper or escort, not a law student at Georgetown…

      Report Post »  
  • SquareHead
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:34pm

    If you don’t know David Barton and his work you are loosing out. Check this out:Our nation would not be in the condition it is if Dave Barton was in charge of historical education in the public schools the last 30 years.

    Check out this video for a small taste of his work: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REl-99K-8tk

    Report Post »  
  • godlovinmom
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:30pm

    Truly a man after God’s own heart…Keep it coming David!!…one of the best things Glen Beck has done for us…introducing us to David.

    Report Post » godlovinmom  
    • Abraham Young
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:44pm

      And ENCINOM knows all.

      Bow to the truthful, omnipotent, all seeing, all knowing, ENCINOM.

      Choose ye this day whom you will bow down to. Let it be the great, the mysterious, the superdogmatic: ENCINOM

      MAY he, she, or it, reign supreme in the annals of history. May the communists succeed in purging the likes of David Barton from our hearts and mind. May the Saul Alinskyites be successful in their tactics, so that Lucifer, son of Morning, may ascend to the supremacy of government in our time.

      Report Post »  
    • godlovinmom
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:45pm

      Then why was he on The daily show, if only bible thumpers like him. You only had to put your avator on there Encinom…no comment was necessay…we already know where you are coming from.

      Report Post » godlovinmom  
    • mcsledge
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:47pm

      encinom – Truth has no agenda and it is validated by the Spirit of God.

      Maybe you should go to the source of history rather than focusing on the progressive babble/propoganda that came about in the early 1900s.

      Progressives believe they can rewrite history to accommodate their own agendas. Conservatives seek the truth in history – good or bad.

      Report Post » mcsledge  
    • stage9
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:48pm

      The great thing about Barton is that he’s not a pseudo-historian like most secular revisionists are. He backs up his work with strong original historical sources. Thus he doesn’t need to resort to pointless indefensible arguments like the secular revisionists do. Heck, even the Library of Congress acknowledges Christianity in America’s founding and government.

      http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/religion/

      To ignore this is to be a revisionist liar.

      Report Post » stage9  
    • encinom
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:00pm

      mcsledge
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:47pm
      encinom – Truth has no agenda and it is validated by the Spirit of God.

      Right, but Barton and Beck have an agenda, selling crappy books to the mindless sheep that will buy them.

      Report Post »  
    • Walkabout
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 5:27pm

      Wow Encinom, you have commented so much on Barton. you must be afraid.

      The truth to you is like the Sword of Shanara was to the antagonist in the 1st book.

      Report Post »  
    • colt1860
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 6:27pm

      I have come to notice that Encinom just about NEVER has anything informative or productive to offer, only bias, ignorant, asinine opinions. He spouts things without any substantial support or evidence. He thinks citing modern liberal, activist judges is somehow evidence of supporting his notion of our nation’s “secular” history. LOL. He can’t find at least five historic statements, cases or instances, directly related to our nation, that backs his radical claims, he can only site closet communists, and their minions.

      Report Post »  
  • ochsrus
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:29pm

    That was amazing to watch. David Barton is a patriot, and Jon Stewart was a gracious host. Nice to see these things together.

    Report Post »  
  • bukowski72
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:19pm

    I don’t believe this story at all. According to your conservative buddy at breitbart.com, John Nolte, no one watches the Daily Show and it has no impact. Therefore It is impossible that so many people googled David Barton after his appearance on the Daily Show.

    Either Nolte is an idiot or someone is lying.

    Report Post »  
    • GoodStuff
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:34pm

      Stewart ratings aren’t good. So what’s your point? Look who’s number two “Bryce Harper” ??

      Report Post »  
    • Abraham Young
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:48pm

      ENCINOM

      That is SO original! Your mother must be quite proud of your accomplishments.

      We wait with baited breath for your next pronouncement.

      Report Post »  
    • mcsledge
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:50pm

      encinom – Lucifer is a poor master. When you wake up, you may want to consider God The Father, Christ and truth. Their eternal rewards are endless.

      Report Post » mcsledge  
    • Stone Cold Truth
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:15pm

      The reason for the high number of searches is because all the Daily Show’s viewers are young and/or hipster people who stay on computers all the time. In other words the Daily Show’s viewers have a disproportionate number of computer junkies compared to other viewer blocks.

      Report Post » Stone Cold Truth  
    • jerseyjo
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:31pm

      bukowski72…..
      In your narrow mind you would think this way. It‘s quite possible and probable that Nolte is correct in what he said about no one watching or Jon Stewart’s show not having an impact while at the same time David Barton being number 1 in Google searches. Both claims can be verified by different sources that are not “friendly” to the conservative cause.

      I, for one, do not watch any of those “comedy” shows for a variety of reasons. So they have no impact on me but I do go on websites such as the Blaze where they have the three very interesting videos of Stewart’s show with Barton. Being a big Barton fan I watched them and then I googled him. It’s that simple. I am sure I am not the only person who did this. My situation proves that both Nolte AND Google could very easily be correct.

      So…now who is the idiot???? NIce try moron……go troll somewhere else where your idiocy will be appreciated and encouraged by other like minded idiots.

      Report Post »  
  • SREGN
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:01pm

    Truth be told is… him.

    Report Post »  
  • johnVMFA122
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:01pm

    David Barton is as much a hero of this republic IMHO as any that have worn a uniform. There are different ways to fight, and this man uses the power of prayerful knowledge of history to enlighten the hearts of those seeking truth. Truth is more powerful than bullets, and God knows we need truth today more than ever.

    Report Post »  
    • Cesium
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:33pm

      hog wash. he is an amateur historian. He himself is taking Jefferson out of context on the topic of belief in the supernatural. Barton is obviously a biased investigator. This is why he is not a professional historian. If you do your own research on the internet you will find a lot of contention to Barton’s conclusions. But believers do not like critical thinking. I remember seeing Barton on Glenn Beck trying to proclaim that Washington was highly religious because in one of his letters he used biblical axioms to lay down his ideals of the american future. This is like a typical ignorant christian taking a totally erroneous position on Einstein believing in God after he said:

      “God doesn’t play dice.” Einstein also said, “I cannot conceive of a God who rewards and punishes his creatures, or has a will of the kind that we experience in ourselves. Neither can I nor would I want to conceive of an individual that survives his physical death; let feeble souls, from fear or absurd egoism, cherish such thoughts.“ Just as Jefferson said ”Christianity neither is, nor ever was a part of the common law.” and “And the day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the supreme being as his father in the womb of a virgin will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter. But may we hope that the dawn of reason and freedom of thought in these United States will do away with this artificial scaffolding, and restore to us….”

      Report Post »  
    • Abraham Young
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:47pm

      May George Soros and the Luciferians and their little minions flood the Blaze with their hate and envy and greed and lust for power, so that the truth may be smothered out like a tiny bug under the feet of the powermongers.

      May the satan inspired shadow government have their way with us all, so that we may be smitten and driven before them like the little slaves we deserve to be.

      May the truth be forever stamped out by the selfish pettiness of the ruling elite.

      We bow to them, the intellectual socialists and their puppetmasters in the Communist underground.

      Report Post »  
    • phrogdriver
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:38pm

      @cesium:

      Of course, if you posted the ENITRE quote, it may take a little different meaning:

      “The truth is that the greatest enemies to the doctrines of Jesus are those calling themselves the expositors of them, who have perverted them for the structure of a system of fancy absolutely incomprehensible, and without any foundation in his genuine words. And the day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the supreme being as his father in the womb of a virgin will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter. But we may hope that the dawn of reason and freedom of thought in these United States will do away all this artificial scaffolding, and restore to us the primitive and genuine doctrines of this the most venerated reformer of human errors.”

      Report Post » phrogdriver  
    • Leader1776
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:07pm

      @CESIUM
      Your posts are evidence of why you’ll NEVER be an element of importance. You’re stuck in your place on the periodic table for all other elements to chide.

      Please define ‘professional’ historian. Is that anything like ‘cajun cooking’ historian? The adjective is meaningless in the context of historian. Please, get it together or you’ll have the lowliest of gases (bovine flatus = CH4) laughing at you along with the elements on the PT.

      Lying? Please cite the Jefferson works that support your premise, as we know Barton, but only know Cesium as an alkali metal.

      Report Post » Leader1776  
    • thegreatheed
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:09pm

      Cesium, you are the amateur here.

      An amateur troll.

      You log in, spew something you know is incorrect, hoping someone won’t catch you in the act.

      Try again.

      Report Post »  
    • Cesium
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:36pm

      @Frogdriver…. The complete quote still scoffs at Jesus as a supernatural entity. It is the historical Jesus that Jefferson is referring to!! “The truth is that the greatest enemies to the doctrines of Jesus are those calling themselves the expositors of them, who have perverted them for the structure of a system of fancy absolutely incomprehensible, and without any foundation in his genuine words.“ He is essentially condemning ”jesus freaks” who make a majority of this country. Those who do exactly what he describes in the rest of the quote. The teachings of love by christ bear no truth on supernatural claims.

      @Abraham young.. Nice try “Torch Bearer” I’m a Fiscal Conservative. George Soros is on no team of mine.

      @Leader 1776 A professional Historian would be one who presents their conclusions to peer review for publication, not one who touts their own work as truth. There is little difference between History research and Science. Barton does not approach his work scientifically… It is also amusing to see you deride Cesium as an element.. Cesium was instrumental in DNA Isolation. Plebeian. Now you know Cesium beyond it’s categorization. I should charge you for that bit of didacticism:

      Report Post »  
    • Cesium
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:38pm

      for LEADER1776 http://www.religiondispatches.org/dispatches/joannabrooks/4582/why_won't_david_barton_submit_to_peer_review/

      Report Post »  
    • Cesium
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:39pm

      @THEGREATHEED I tried again… Check

      Report Post »  
    • Cesium
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 5:05pm

      And just be clear for all of you… I in no way proclaim that Jefferson was an Atheist… because I can deduce your assumptions as easy as I can take a breath, Jefferson surely believed in creator…Hell, as an atheist, I still welcome the possibility that a creator exists. just as Richard Dawkins does as well! But where is the evidence that Jefferson was a “believer” in Christ as Lord? Please show me that? Please show me the argument that our genius founders designed this country to be specifically “christian” and guided by Jesus the ghost?

      Report Post »  
    • phrogdriver
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 5:42pm

      It never ceases to amaze me how the left will lie, then get caught red handed, then claim that their lie isn’t a lie, I’m just not smart enough to understand that, even though they were lying, they are still right.

      Report Post » phrogdriver  
    • phrogdriver
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 6:25pm

      Oh, and since I was bored, I checked the other cesium “quote”. Jeffferson did, in fact, say that Christianity was not the basis of common law – in ENGLAND. He maintained that common law (as opposed to written law) originated before Christianity.

      He went on to point out that Jewish law (i.e. – Leviticus) was the basis for common law . . .in ENGLAND.

      Report Post » phrogdriver  
    • phrogdriver
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 6:40pm

      And just to make it a trifecta: maybe people actually believed Einstein believed in God from THIS quote -

      “I’m not an atheist. I don’t think I can call myself a pantheist. The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library filled with books in many languages. The child knows someone must have written those books. It does not know how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child dimly suspects a mysterious order in the arrangement of the books but doesn’t know what it is. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of even the most intelligent human being toward God. We see the universe marvelously arranged and obeying certain laws but only dimly understand these laws.”

      Read more: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1607298,00.html#ixzz1tkrMpuhT

      Report Post » phrogdriver  
    • colt1860
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:32pm

      Cesium’s claims are frivolous. They are taken way out of context.

      Jefferson said,

      “The doctrines of Jesus are simple, and tend all to the happiness of man.”

      “The practice of morality being necessary for the well being of society, He [God] has taken care to impress its precepts so indelibly on our hearts that they shall not be effaced by the subtleties of our brain. We all agree in the obligation of the moral principles of Jesus and nowhere will they be found delivered in greater purity than in His discourses.”

      “I am a Christian in the only sense in which He wished anyone to be: sincerely attached to His doctrines in preference to all others.”

      “I am a real Christian – that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus Christ.”

      Thomas Jefferson said, “God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are of the Gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever; That a revolution of the wheel of fortune, a change of situation, is among possible events; that it may become probable by Supernatural influence! The Almighty has no attribute which can take side with us in that event.” Notes on the State of Virginia (Philadelphia: Matthew Carey, 1794), Query XVIII, p. 237.

      Report Post »  
    • colt1860
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:52pm

      Thomas Jefferson, said, “The older I grow and the more I read the Holy Scriptures, the more reverence I have for them and the more I am convinced that they are not only the people’s guide for the conduct of this life, but the foundation of our hope respecting the future state.” (Upper Room Bulletin, Vol. 3, 1916, p. 8.)

      Thomas Jefferson said, in his second Inaugural Address (1805), “I shall need, too, the favor of that Being in whose hands we are, who led our fathers, as Israel of old, from their native land and planted them in a country flowing with all the necessaries and comforts of life; who has covered our infancy with His providence and our riper years with His wisdom and power, and to whose goodness I ask you to join in supplications with me that He will so enlighten the minds of your servants, guide their councils, and prosper their measures that whatsoever they do shall result in your good, and shall secure to you the peace, friendship, and approbation of all nations.”

      All this lines up clearly with the US Northwest Ordinance, made Law in 1787, which states, “Religion, morality, and knowledge, BEING NECESSARY to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged.”

      Benjamin Franklin declared, “Freedom is not a gift bestowed upon us by other men, but a right that belongs to us by the laws of God and nature.”

      Clearly, our nation is one founded by a religious people.

      Report Post »  
    • Cesium
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 11:15pm

      @Phrogdriver So your research efforts corroborates my view and that of many historians that Jefferson’s view on common law of “English” people does not refer to Christian perspective but is rather Jewish Indeed! There is a lot here to debate based on that alone! Jewish perspective on god can be quite quite different than Christian perspective and can include an agnostic or pantheistic view, both categorizable under atheism or judaism. Judaism does not require faith in god! (check ole wikipedia on judaism if you disagree http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_principles_of_faith I knew this before wiki existed) If I am to recognize Jesus , I recognize him as the Rabbi and not the savior proclaimed by the gospels. It is likely this was Jefferson’s view as well. The Separative/anti-semetic foundations of christiantiy are even evident in the new testament..It is in Roman 3:31 and mathew 5:17 where Jesus inferred that Jewish laws and traditions shall not be abandoned. Yet here’s the Christians , changed the length of weekely sabbath time and day, ignored the passover and remembrance of slavery, stopped abiding by kosher law, and created other mysterious ways to separate from Jews..(didn’t work out well for us) Abandoning Judaism was never shown to be something Jesus wanted to happen! A new covenant does not mean start a new religion! Jefferson likely embraced the views of Jesus the rabbi, not the supernatural magic christian Jesus that Barton wishes he did.

      Report Post »  
    • phrogdriver
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 11:54pm

      So let me get this straight: You refered to “ignorant Christians” who do not like “critical thinking”. You do “research” on wikipedia without questioning anything you read there. You have no independent knowledge whatsoever. You are completely ignorant of the things you claim to have knowledge of. Your claims are proven to be utterly and completely false, yet you cling to them with white knuckled ferocity.

      Congratulations. You are the consumate liberal. Gullible, ignorant, insulting. And yet you insist on proudly displaying that ignorance and gullibility as a badge of honor.

      For some reason, I am exceptionally relieved that I don’t understand you people.

      Report Post » phrogdriver  
    • Cesium
      Posted on May 3, 2012 at 12:18am

      @phrogdriver Yes, Christians much of the time ignore facts especially in the realm of what is not known… Did you not see the part where I said I knew about the information on wikipedia before wikepedia ever existed? I said that because I know that would be your first thought…I am Jewish and was raised jewish. Much of our structure is passed down orally and I just happen to agree with that wikipedia page who someone else wrote. Unless I was lied to in the same way the author of that wiki page was I await you to prove my claims as wrong.. You guys love to play the “coward accusation” card. I’m neither that nor a far left liberal.. Certain things about me are liberal but no more than the people who took us out of the Dark Ages… You should be happy I’m not voting for Obama. Go ahead with your assumptions.

      Report Post »  
    • CA_Refugee
      Posted on May 3, 2012 at 12:42am

      @Cesium…give it up you’ve been crushed. You absolutely lack the understand and ability to understand what Christ was saying about the “Law” and following it. He did not come to kill the law as he said, but obeying the Law alone will not provide you salvation. Understand that you are misunderstanding and misrepresenting key tenants of Christianity, unlike any commentary I’ve every heard I understand you to believe that Christ did not mean what he said.

      Report Post »  
    • colt1860
      Posted on May 3, 2012 at 1:37am

      The following are excerpts from a House report delivered on Mary 27, 1854 (the Senate report was very similar):

      “Had the people [the Founding Fathers], during the Revolution, had a suspicion of any attempt to war against Christianity, that Revolution would have been strangled in its cradle. At the time of the adoption of the Constitution and the amendments, the universal sentiment was that Christianity should be encouraged, but not any one sect [denomination]…. In this age, there is no substitute for Christianity…. That was the religion of the founders of the republic, and they expected it to remain the religion of their descendants.”

      Two months later, the Judiciary Committee made this strong declaration:

      “The great, vital, and conservative element in our system [the thing that holds our system together] is the believe of our people in the pure doctrines and divine truths of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.”

      Report Post »  
    • Cesium
      Posted on May 3, 2012 at 1:37am

      @CA-Refuge How have I been Crushed? explain the true context of Christ’s law on that matter if I am wrong. When did Christ say to abandon Jewish laws and start a new religion that violates the second commandment? (which is abridged by christians) He didn’t, furthermore it is merely suggestion to know what Jesus said through the gospels.. you’re gonna tell me Paul, all those years later after the death of Jesus, got it right and didn’t embelish or make s4#t up? Man can hardly get anything right without technological instruments like voice recorders or cameras to prove what actually happened a day ago let alone over 2000 years. ..Man, if science and history worked the way faith ie by hearsay, we’d still be trying to net fish for dinner and washing our clothes by the river.

      Report Post »  
    • Leader1776
      Posted on May 3, 2012 at 8:39am

      @CESIUM
      Submitted to peer review publications might make someone an academic, not a ‘professional’. The scandal that is climate [pseudo] science, that includes now defunct reams of data submitted to so-called peer review publications diminishes the importance of peer review as proof of validity, especially in politically charged subjects such as this.

      Again as all good little Alinsky-ites you troll sites denigrating individuals in an attempt to discredit their work. If you were the ‘professional’ you are so quick to state about others you would be citing specifics, taking a Barton position and providing solid data that is in opposition would prove your position. You don’t. Chances are you’ve read (if anything) the titles and covers of Barton’s works and this opposes your world view. Either supply substantive support for your attack of individuals or stop the attempt to take the moral, intellectual high-ground. You’ll approach respect within any circle you frequent if you communicate using real facts and not bomb throw as you do here. Fail.

      And Cesium ………… you bother to defend against a joke? You really do have ego issues. I‘m sure that’s why you chose Cesium, because ‘IT’ was the reason we now have unlocked, elucidated, and sequenced DNA? Right?

      Report Post » Leader1776  
    • Cesium
      Posted on May 3, 2012 at 12:29pm

      No, I chose Cesium as homage to the ingenuity of DNA isolation which as you know, led to very weighty evidence in favor of evolution (to the chagrin of the “wishful thinkers.” I mean faithful) But, you could also say I found the use of Cesium as an atomic time keeper interesting. The only comment I can make about your example on climate change science is that I agree with you 100%, but history evidence and the chaos of weather are pretty dissimilar. I would certainly not place myself in the field of weather science because I’d have to be biased just so I could feed my family… climate researchers are in the fields where experimentation is least tractable. Particularly due to the fact that human lifespan along with the inception of science inquiry(a blip in our existence) and geologic time do not mix.. Every other field of science extrapolates evidence by their ability to manipulate a system.. I have never seen anyone start, or stop a tornado or a hurricane.. so until they do that in a timely manner or collect weather patterns with modern equipment for 10,000 years, I cannot fully respect that area of science despite their peer review processes. medical, physics, or history is much more tractable and presents a lot more evidence that you can either see, or detect. For a climate scientist to say anything about the impact of greenhouse gasses in less than a 100 year perioed.. I need 10,000 year control

      Report Post »  
  • PATRIOTMAMA
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:00pm

    I have to give kudos to Jon for having him on and not just bashing him the whole time. That is what true debate looks like. An honest, FAIR, look at both sides. I appreciated with what Jon had to say on the contraception issue. HOWEVER, it is my understanding that Catholic organizations aren’t allowed to hire only Catholics in their hospitals. I could be wrong but I thought you had to be an equal opportunity employer. I know the rules for tax exempt employers are different though. But, if I’m right and they are forced to hire and not discriminate based on religion then they have no choice but to hire non-Catholics and therefore are then being forced to pay for contraception to non-Catholics that they are being forced to hire. If it’s a willing choice then Jon brings up a good point about the whole thing, that I hadn’t considered. But again, if they are not allowed to hire only Catholics then you can’t use that arguement because they have no choice but to “play the game” and hire into “the evil” as he puts it.

    Report Post »  
    • operagost
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:23pm

      Correct. Title VII of the 1964 civil rights act prohibits employers from discriminating based on religion, and in case that somehow wasn’t clear enough precedent was set in the case of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kamehameha School. Stewart is wrong again.

      Report Post » operagost  
    • happ77
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:25pm

      Non catholics have the choice to not take the job.

      Report Post »  
    • encinom
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:44pm

      No Stewart is correct, a Catholic hospital can not hire only catholic nurses and doctors (see Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kamehameha School, the School was prohibited from hiring only Protestant teachers). In the end, if the Catholic Church seeks to enter the Secular world, it can not claim a special privilegde, individuals can but not inistitutions.

      Report Post »  
  • becauseitmatters
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 1:38pm

    I love this guy, and I love that the truth is being told! I hope that people will learn our true history and fall in love with the dream again. We’re losing it, and it helps to know what we’re losing. I’m ready to stand for the old Christian American values, and I don’t care what the liberals or progressives call/label me. I’m NOT afraid. The hearts of our children ARE worth fighting for.

    Report Post »  
    • encinom
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:47pm

      You won’t learn the truth or Americna History from PT Barnums like Barton.

      Report Post »  
    • MOS 11B
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:50pm

      When encinom the great Commie **** speaks
      you can watch the Feces just roll out of its mouth!
      What would an Anti-American Commie that has
      the IQ of a fish like you know about our history.
      Now get on back down to your basement ****
      because anyone with half a working brain pays no
      attention to your **** dribbling mouth anyway.
      David Barton is a great American Christian historian
      & he scares the poop out of bottom feeders like encinommie.

      Report Post »  
    • Brad Wesselmann
      Posted on May 3, 2012 at 9:25am

      Nor from malcontents as you. :-)

      Report Post » Brad Wesselmann  
  • GeorgieJo
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 1:38pm

    David Barton is a WALKING encylopedia!!!!
    I absolutely admire this man.

    OMG 2012

    Report Post »  
  • MNYukon
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 1:34pm

    David Barton is a well read history intelligent individual – especially United States history and its founding fathers. I have watched him for several years on various Christian television interviews long before he ever was on Glen Beck or other tv programs.

    Report Post »  
  • YourVoiceMatters
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 1:33pm

    I saw David Barton years ago on Christian tv program…
    Ken Copeland another amazing American
    (who ive followed from the 70′s)
    and just loved his command of all things history and Truth.
    I was and am so impressed with him to this day.
    His rise into the public square is long overdue.
    There is no man so deserving and
    yet so humble in the office…
    He is America’s treasure truly!
    For he single handedly preserved our history…for this day and hour!

    Report Post »  
  • RANGER1965
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 1:28pm

    I’ve always liked him. I wish that I could debate with his quiet passion. He speaks with the calm assurance of one who is a master of his craft.

    It is men such as him that will do the most damage to the left.

    RANGER

    Report Post » RANGER1965  
    • Mark0331
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 1:36pm

      @RANGER….watch this thread explode with ‘trolls’ coming out to dispute Bartons findings and disparage his character…so predictable. Notice they only show up when Religion, OWS, Homosexuality and Atheism are topics…they get their ‘marching orders’ and then vent for about 2 hours then crawl back into their leftist caves.

      Report Post » Mark0331  
    • catwilli
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 1:39pm

      @ranger, u speak the truth!

      Report Post » catwilli  
    • RANGER1965
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 1:48pm

      @MARK0331

      I’ll keep an eye out Mark. It makes since though. Stories about corn chip bags on cat’s heads, or a some gay activist Nimrod that is so outspoken that even hard core leftists are distancing themselves are not worth commenting on or defending.

      But Barton is a true danger. A man of principle, who quietly convicts and questions what the left has been spewing for years. And he does it so well!

      He is a danger to them, and needs to be destroyed.

      RANGER

      Report Post » RANGER1965  
    • Shasta
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 1:55pm

      I hope he has a few great apprentaces to carry on his wonderful work.

      Report Post » Shasta  
    • avs1021
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 1:58pm

      @RANGER1965
      i think your spot on. look into his work, and read his findings. Kurt Cameron also had him in his movie Monumental. what he had to say in that movie was amazing. i’d recomend to everyone to check it out. Thank you for your service to our country and God bless America.
      Scouts Out!

      Report Post »  
    • armyofnibiru
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 2:07pm

      DAVID BARTON for president 2012;

      Report Post »  
    • Truth1776
      Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:08pm

      Agreed.

      Report Post » Truth1776  
  • SquidVetOhio
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 1:21pm

    Kudos to Jon Stewart for having him on!

    Report Post » SquidVetOhio  
  • justangry
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 1:18pm

    For the record… I trust David Barton in this area.

    Report Post » justangry  
  • lukerw
    Posted on May 2, 2012 at 1:12pm

    David is… alike Grant & Patton on the BattleField!

    Report Post » lukerw  
1 2 3 4

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love