Politics

Day 2: S.E Cupp Conducts Her Own Straw Poll From CPAC

Comments (182)

1 2 3
  • UnreconstructedLibertarian
    Posted on February 11, 2012 at 12:43am

    I don’t think I fully realized how totalitarian the Republicans could be, until Santorum started to surge.

    Big Government in the “crony caplitalism” way? Yeah, I’ve always understood that both parties play to the crowd looking for government benefits and favorable regulation/legislation. That would be your Newt Romney or any member of the Socialist left.

    I reject the notion that government should be the nanny over anyone. Santorum is as far out in the left field of personal control as the actual socialists are. “My way or the highway” Santorum, does’nt sound that much different than the unaccomplished idiot in the White House presently – different sides of the same coin in my opinion.

    I’m sure this recent surge will embolden the man – you’d better listen closely – you just might hear the same things I have. Any politician of any side who thinks they know better for me than I know myself – isn’t getting my vote at all.

    Folks, you’d better choose carefully – this may be the last time you get to vote at all.

    Report Post » UnreconstructedLibertarian  
    • TakenUsername
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 1:43am

      Santorum is just as bad as Obama?

      The ONLY things that he voted on that grew government was Medicare Part D and NCLB, which he said was a mistake afterwards.

      Calling him a totalitarian or like Obama is taking 2 votes he made and making it appear as the norm.

      Romney – Grew government in MS consistently.

      Gingrich – Massive Progressive.

      Ron Paul – Crazy.

      Santorum is the only real conservative left in the race.

      Report Post » TakenUsername  
    • TeaPartyForRomney
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 2:17am

      I am a little surprised Glenn‘s group didn’t put up Romney or Gingrich’s speeches. Romney definitely had the loudest applause, most standing ovations, and (though I may be bias) the best speech on how we need to distinguish ourselves from Obama and show how we will make a difference and how we should earn the Presidency to replace Obama.
      Here is Romney’s speech: http://url2it.com/lobk

      Report Post »  
    • TeaPartyForRomney
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 2:41am

      And here is Gingrich’s speech: http://url2it.com/lobl

      Report Post »  
    • TEXASGRANNY73
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 3:48am

      @Username Romney Gov. of MA, not MS. If you‘ve ever voted previous elections you’ve already voted for someone who thinks they know better than you. Nanny has been around for years. So, don’t vote. Let me decide. Thank you so much..

      Report Post »  
    • ranger22x
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 4:09am

      A conservative, a moderate, and a liberal walk into a bar. And the bartender goes, “Hey, it’s Mitt Romney!”

      Report Post » ranger22x  
    • Future Hope
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 5:18am

      The Republicans have issues. It’s like the lesser of two evils. But, if you vote for King Obama and his DSC(Democratic, Socialist, Communist) party you insure the destruction of our country. Simple as that.

      Report Post »  
    • Wat Tyler
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 6:25am

      @TakenUsername:

      I’m beginning to think your parroted propaganda about Ron Paul being “crazy” may have some merit.

      It’s becoming more and more apparent that one has to be crazy to think he has a fair shake in this well entrenched, bought and paid for, corrupt cesspool of a system that cheats him out of delegates while selling us the notion that the people‘s votes don’t count (”non-binding”) right before our eyes.

      The “establishment” bosses are controlling our “democracy” in some back room.

      Doesn’t anyone else see this? This is NOT democracy. It is pure BS, along with Orwellian corporate media accomplices that back this despicable play.

      It’s right out of some Banana Republic.This whole facade is illegitimate.

      Report Post » Wat Tyler  
    • Wat Tyler
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 6:45am

      Watching this election unfold, and the blatant, in-your-face “blackout” treatment of Ron Paul, I have learned a lot about how this country is really run and whose big money runs it. I don’t like what I see.

      So this is the “American Exceptionalism” we keep hearing so much bunk about? No wonder the world sees us as obnoxious hypocrites arrogantly trying to throw our weight around when our own house is rotten to the core.

      Report Post » Wat Tyler  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 7:02am

      anyone but Ron Kook Paul
      http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/11/the_ron_paul_campaign_and_its.html

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • Wat Tyler
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 7:20am

      What “conservatives” really are: Snake handling religious fanatics who seek to impose their rigid, kooky medieval beliefs on everyone else. The same “tongue”-speaking zealots who brought us the Salem Witch Trials and David Karresh.

      Libertarians represent awakening from that darkness into an age of enlightenment in the spirit of Franklin, Washington, and Jefferson.

      I’m with them. So are all the youth voters. They are the GOP’s future.

      Wat Tyler  
    • Go-rin-no-sho
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 7:22am

      @Republicorp How about anyone but the establishment?

      Report Post » Go-rin-no-sho  
    • PresidentDowngrade
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 7:50am

      CC Cupps is pretty hot until she talks. I think Glen has been drugging her with his crazy juice. Now if you want super hot and brilliant. Kimberly Guilfoyle and a close second Miss Andrea Tantaros…..Nishe very very Nishe..

      Report Post »  
    • disenlightened
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 7:51am

      @WAT TYLER
      Some would say libertarians are just Nancy-boys afraid to take any stands in life. Given your clownish remarks about conservatives, I may tend to agree with that. You might make more progress towards “awakening from that darkness” if you just took your head out of your ass.

      Report Post » disenlightened  
    • SamIamTwo
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 8:05am

      There is only one of the three that can draw the proverbial line in the sand. And if you don’t know who that is, then you are not paying attention.

      There needs to be a serious stark difference to see what sort of nation we have become. I seriously do not think that Obama will be re-elected, unless we are fooled again. We have been catering to the far left desires and turned this nation into a mess…starting with public education, and thru public education pushing a sick agenda on our children…they have created an environment of hate. jimho

      The radical dems have come out of the closet and we know for a fact that they want bigger government.

      Report Post » SamIamTwo  
    • Lonescrapper
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 8:08am

      I am disappointed that the GOP keeps wanting someone ‘charismatic’ and ‘angry’ to defeat Obama. They want passion, etc. etc. Well… that’s exactly what the Democrats got in 2008. Did it satisfy them? Are we better off because we had someone who could ‘articulate’ the message? We need someone with a proven record of repairing economies. Someone who has shown they can wade into a mess and make a success, and there is only one person available who can do that. He‘s not ’charismatic and passionate’ but he has the age, the success record and the willingness to do it. I‘m kinda tired of the ’anyone but Romney” crowd. Why? You don’t really have a reason that is logical when it comes to politics. Even Santorum said he was a ‘true conservative’ in 2008. The GOP continually shoots itself in the foot and I’m almost certain it will keep doing it without divine intervention.

      Report Post » Lonescrapper  
    • SamIamTwo
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 8:16am

      Lonescrapper

      Take no offense, but Obama has caused this mess…he has pissed off more than a few groups on the left and on the right…this is what happens when you get a president that doesn’t listen to ALL of the people and sides with the FAR LEFT…

      I will not go timid into the night!

      Report Post » SamIamTwo  
    • tooksdad
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 9:31am

      SC is so hot

      Report Post »  
    • brittdd
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 11:27am

      The only hope for conservatives is to let the republican convention select the candidate. Even then it is unlikely that the conservatives will win because this election is going to look like one from a communist country. There will be lots of intimidation, corruption,and fraud., so be prepared.

      Report Post »  
    • momsense
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 12:43pm

      Learn the definition before you use it—–everything is totalitarian if you’re a Libertarian.

      Report Post »  
    • sodacrackers2
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 1:20pm

      There is a big difference between choosing and choosing evil.

      Report Post »  
    • sodacrackers2
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 1:26pm

      choosing good!

      Report Post »  
    • PKato
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 4:10pm

      You are absolutely correct Newt Sanitorium, Willard Gingrich or Rick Romney…it doesn’t matter if any of these guys get the nomination or if Obama keeps it…Liberty will be ripped from us piece by piece…in my opinion, only Paul can give us hope and the powers that be in the Republican Party will not allow him. I for one am writing in Ron Paul in the Presidential election, because if it is not him and these other idiots, it won’t matter. This country is screwed and people are so unaware that it is frightening.

      Report Post »  
    • sancheleezy
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 4:10pm

      Republicorp you are nothing but a Republicrat who will do anything to derail the clean campaign of Constitutionalist Dr Ron Paul and all of those other “kook” kool aid drinkers out their who are around to demean R.P. you all fear him because you are “Obama-light”, pro- government types who believe in war and huge government. You slough at the same trough as do the Democrats. Grow up and realize that you do not really believe in the Republic but are simpletons who believe in simle democracy or mob rule.

      Report Post »  
    • Wat Tyler
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 6:47pm

      Case in point: That Nevada caucus vote was as crooked and fraudulent as it gets. It needs to be investigated and people need to go to jail.

      I have a feeling the same thing happened in Maine.

      They stole it from Ron Paul. And they have the audacity to criticize Putin in Russia for his shenanigans when they do the same thing here.

      “American Exceptionalism” anyone?

      Report Post » Wat Tyler  
    • hortik
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 7:12pm

      UnReconLib,
      It’s great that you have all these purist ideals and political rhetoric, but when it comes time to vote, you need to realise that the majority of Americans arn’t that purist or ideology driven, many want their government benefits to continue.

      If the Republican Party nominates a guy who promises to end their programs and shrink the government to the point that would satisfy a hard-core Libertarian…. he would get beat in the general election by Barack Obama in a LANDSLIDE. Reality is… There are just too many American voters out there who want a little bigger government, they will not vote for a libertarian small government ideolog that appeals to a narrow group.

      To actually WIN (and not just give you a thrill by scoring some purist ideology based points in the debates)…. he’s going to have to appeal to Independents too, not just purist conservatives or hard-core libertarians. Any candidate that just appeals to one of these groups, and not to the more general public out there… will go down in flames in the general election.

      I agree we need to be careful when we vote. THINK about who you vote for to represent the party in the general election…. vote for sombody who can WIN in the general election, not just somebody who makes you feel good and represents your narrow view of America. We need a candidate that can even get some votes from the not so hard-core independents, and even some of the disalusioned Demorcats out ther to win.

      Report Post »  
    • HermanHusband
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 10:52pm

      Your tone and choice of words to communicate your frustration at a surging Santorum does not do much to support your concerns — please use facts so others may learn from you. I assume you like Ron Paul? But the “idiot” argument smacks of somone left of center, or somone who is uneducated. None of those left would be quite as bad as Obama, to say otherwise is rhetoric. Compared to Paul, Santorum is a hands on kinda guy, true but in terms of policies, taxation and spending Santorum seems more like Reagan than Ron Paul. Reagan spent big time on the military during a time we could perhaps afford it, now we need to cut back on just about everything. So is anyone better with freedom that Santorum? We all need to decide who that person is through searching out the facts.

      Report Post »  
    • Aviyah
      Posted on February 16, 2012 at 3:56pm

      Knock it off numb skulls. Some of us will not get the candidate we wanted. Anyone of these guys will be better than Obummer though. You seem to forget, neither of these guys IS Obama. We will just have to hold his feet to the fire to get him to behave. When this primary is over we need everyone to kiss and make up ~ everyone into the battle (Libertarians, Conservatives, and Republicans). Otherwise we lose our country! Done!…over with!…gone for good! Don’t you dare let that happen!!!

      Report Post » Aviyah  
  • wellhangingchad
    Posted on February 11, 2012 at 12:23am

    The problem is that it has already been decided. No matter who you vote for it will be Romney/Rubio. The establishment has already given it to Romney for allowing McCain to take it last time. I am a Santorum fan but the “machine” has already chosen. Even if every other delegate was to win the rest of the states Romney would still win. Unless a miracle happens this country is doomed in less than 10 years.

    Report Post »  
    • SHOWMESTATEGUY
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 3:38am

      I guess the truth of the matter is the Republican establishment care nothing for the social issues that most conservatives feel strongly about. I’m starting to believe the establishment is using us for votes only.

      Romney is as establishment as they come. He really has no social agenda, other than the dem lib agenda that he passed while governor of some small Eastern State. When a president has no social agenda then the other party wins. Do the Democrats have a social agenda? Hell yes they do and they are not afraid to push it. The establishment Republicans act as if they are ashamed of the social conservative agenda.

      The establishment Rebuplicans can’t win a county election without the support of the conservative base but they pay us nothing but lip service. Taken as a whole I want what the establishment wants, the trouble is the establishment could give a care less about what I, the social conservative wants.

      Maybe time to start thinking about a third party and let the old guard Republicans take care of themselves.

      Report Post »  
    • kerrtk
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 2:20pm

      Go Romney!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Report Post »  
  • mgcre
    Posted on February 11, 2012 at 12:20am

    I could ****** SE…..just saying :-)

    Report Post »  
  • VShagios
    Posted on February 11, 2012 at 12:19am

    Has anyone noticed that S.E. is hot! I love beautiful conservative women.

    Report Post » VShagios  
  • sonnetswan
    Posted on February 11, 2012 at 12:15am

    Did you hear about Judge Napolitano being canned from FoxBusiness. I guess it really is Faux News after all. That stinks. The Judge is a real constitutional defending patriot.

    Report Post » sonnetswan  
    • UnreconstructedLibertarian
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 12:58am

      I didn’t know it until watching the Judge tonight. So much for Fox Business.

      We’re watching the last shreds of the Constitution burn before our eyes. The Judge was the last true “Watchman” on the tower who dealt in unmitigated truth.

      Report Post » UnreconstructedLibertarian  
    • Wat Tyler
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 7:09am

      The judge offered a refreshing alternative to the constant same old left/right bickering.

      “Fair and Balanced” is the most biased of them all.

      Stossel will be next, as he obviously doesn‘t fit Murdoch’s neo-con agenda..

      Report Post » Wat Tyler  
    • Ohio Guy
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 7:45am

      Free now to be a part of GBTV. Sounds good to me. Are you listening Glenn?

      Report Post » Ohio Guy  
    • TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 8:51am

      The Judge’s ratings were in the tank. That’s why Fox Business dropped him. He’s still part of the network. They also dropped Eric Bolling and David Asman. I watched the Judge a few times… and his show sucked. I liked the Judge, but he kind of reminded me of the “wolfie” that Eddie Munster carried around on the old Munsters TV show.

      Napalitano was also a big @ss-slapper for Ron Paul… that will make people think twice about anyone’s logical views in relation to anything… even a “Judge” on a business show. That may have helped him lose viewership (if he ever really had any). How can a person truly take anyone seriously who shills for Ron Paul?

      Report Post » TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12  
    • UnreconstructedLibertarian
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 12:11pm

      I wouldn’t hold my breath until Napolitano shows up at GBTV. The last appearance the Judge made on Glenn’s show was noticably tense.

      Glenn’s assertion that “The truth has no agenda” is about as truthful as Fox’s “Fair and Balanced” mantra. Andrew Napolitano deals in uncompromised, unmitigated truth. Such truth does not sit well with the Beck/Barton contrived concept of American mythology.

      Examples: 1.) the Judge reviews Andrew Jackson’s Presidency with fact – citing his good points as such and correctly applying the bad without bias. Glenn demonizes everything Jackson without exception. 2.) The Judge takes the fully body of historical fact and destroys the myth of Lincoln. This causes Beck to go into asthmatic convulsion. Beck n‘ Barton transpose Lincoln’s Big Government sins upon Jackson erroneously. 3.) Ron Paul. The Judges‘ last appearance on Beck’s GBTV show actually included a question to Beck, “Am I allowed to mention Ron’s name on your show?” it was not a comical moment.

      I would actually suggest that The Judge, Lew Rockwell, Mises Institute, Peter Schiff, Reason Mag – and the whole host of Libertarian figures combine efforts and use Glenn’s model of media outlet creation for thier own purpose. I’ve already cancelled my renew of the year in advance I donated to GBTV – I’d love nothing more than to dedicate that money (perhaps even more) to a Libertarian based internet network.

      Report Post » UnreconstructedLibertarian  
    • Wat Tyler
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 5:50pm

      @Time_to_Pull_Your_Neo_Con_Head_Out

      “The Judge’s ratings were in the tank…”

      Do you have some inside information that none of the rest of us have, or are you just blowing out your @ss again (as usual)?

      Last I checked the Judge and Dobbs were the highest rated on FBN.

      Report Post » Wat Tyler  
  • sonnetswan
    Posted on February 11, 2012 at 12:10am

    What a bunch of BS.

    Report Post » sonnetswan  
    • SamIamTwo
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 8:26am

      Hey don’t put down my football hero, Billy Sims.

      Report Post » SamIamTwo  
    • Mtroom
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 11:30am

      Maybe Billy can come back and kick some more defenders in the head…I sure miss Billy Sims.

      Report Post » Mtroom  
  • blackstone22
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:48pm

    This was the worst segment on “Real News” that aired 2/10 ( and there were some good segments on the show like the Manhattan project, the contraception controversy etc) but somehow editor Scott Baker chooses to post this schlock? Some random, bogus poll conducted by s c cupp? I don’t get it, does the Blaze want to be taken seriously?

    Report Post »  
    • ronljl
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 9:41am

      I don’t know if you actual listen to “the Hot” S.E. or just look at her. But, at the very beginning of her segment, she clearly stated that the ‘straw-poll’ was run on Saturday and since THEBLAZE did not show on Saturday, they would run their “very unscientific” poll today (Friday).
      Got it. It was their “informal poll.” Informal polls are done for entertainment purposes all the time, even by “news” people. So, Either listen to S.E., or look at her. You apperently can not do both!

      Report Post »  
  • Welder
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:46pm

    I keep praying for S.E. to show up in Playboy…

    Report Post » Welder  
    • WatchingThePuppetShow
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:49pm

      OMGosh that was funny!!! Yes, she is quite hot…ironic her name is Cupp.

      Report Post »  
    • MS-GlenNBC
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 11:43pm

      if she kept her glasses on, I could take that seriously…

      Report Post » MS-GlenNBC  
    • blackstone22
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 11:28am

      funny, i keep hoping she’ll be abducted by aliens, or turn liberal…..which may be the same thing.

      Report Post »  
    • MARDABO
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 1:30pm

      S.E. Cupp is a play on words..think: A c cup

      Report Post » MARDABO  
  • LeadNotFollow
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:40pm

    …
    I keep praying for (Atheist) S.E. Cupp, to find God. She seems like a good person. I don’t think Glenn Beck would hire an evil person to work with him.

    Report Post »  
    • Baddoggy
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:47pm

      A lot of good people will go to hell for the rejection of Christ. We can only pray she wakes up and realizes she needs a Savior…Can’t get to Heaven by being a good person…Sorry SE

      Report Post » Baddoggy  
    • The Third Archon
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 11:29pm

      “Can’t get to Heaven by being a good person”
      Don’t want to go there then.

      Report Post » The Third Archon  
    • martinez012577
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 1:07am

      @the third

      So if you have to believe in the Jesus Christ of the Bible and not depend on works to get you there, you dont want to be there?

      If so, we need to pray for you also.

      Report Post » martinez012577  
    • Hossua
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 1:27am

      Meh, at least it will be warm. I believe Jesus existed. I don’t believe he was the son of god. I don’t believe he had supernatural powers. I do, however believe he had some good ideas about how we could be better people.
      As for hell, I think it is BS too. We will see, but either way I’m sure I will have plenty of company.

      Report Post »  
    • The Third Archon
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 1:46am

      “So if you have to believe in the Jesus Christ of the Bible and not depend on works to get you there, you dont want to be there?”
      No–what I am saying is that being good is a superior to seeking to get into heaven. If loving and earnestly seeking good is not sufficient to get into heaven, then I am not at all bothered by my denial of entry. Good is sufficient unto itself to be worth our highest devotion–it needs of nothing else. I’m not opposed to getting into heaven, but I would rather do good than get into heaven if I had to pick between the two. Good ought to be our primary end goal, for its own sake, for the love of good, BECAUSE it is good.

      “Meh, at least it will be warm. I believe Jesus existed. I don’t believe he was the son of god. I don’t believe he had supernatural powers. I do, however believe he had some good ideas about how we could be better people.”
      I tend to agree–I imagine there must be SOME historical facts to Christianity, and I don’t doubt that Jesus had some very Gandhi-type pacifist humanist philosophical teachings that most people (even today) lead perfectly normal more-or-less moral lives following these ideals.

      But I think humans are capable of doing this directly through the application of sense and reason.

      Report Post » The Third Archon  
    • Hossua
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 2:12am

      Ya, that is the point. He was just a man. He achieved his philosophy through reason. It should follow that others could do the same.

      Report Post »  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 7:16am

      “Can’t get to Heaven by being a good person”
      Must be a empty place, a few tumbleweeds ………..what happen to the people before Jesus? SOL?

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • SamIamTwo
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 8:23am

      The Third Archon

      I’d rather be judged by God, than by man. If you can keep all of the laws, you might have a chance but it was God who said, “no one comes to the Father, except thru Me”…something like that.

      Keep doing good, no problem with that. I can’t judge your heart, and as far as I know it you may have accepted God at some time and forgot about it….If so, no one can snatch you from His hand,.

      All of that is between you and God and no one on here.

      Anyhoo, peace out.

      Report Post » SamIamTwo  
  • WatchingThePuppetShow
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:38pm

    Come on people do you REALLY think we live in a republic where we can actually vote a candidate in to the highest office of the United States? Really!? Our presidents just like many other lower ‘higher’ offices are placed. Money places these people in power for a purpose…it’s pretty obvious by now. This election will not matter. Chances are very, very high that Martial law will be used to control the chaos.

    Report Post »  
    • techengineer11
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 12:18am

      That’s true.

      Report Post » techengineer11  
    • MARDABO
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 1:36pm

      That‘s what I always thought but I’m not so sure anymore. That‘s why I’m voting for Ron Paul, I want to see this monster we call govt. taken apart.

      Report Post » MARDABO  
  • Katydidnt
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:20pm

    I just want to say something about the race that Santorum lost in PA. Bob Casey’s father was a beloved pro-life governor of Pennsylvania. A lot of people still felt very strongly the snub that the Clintons had given Governor Casey when they would not even allow him to speak at the Democratic Convention because the Governor was pro-life. Now Senator Casey, the governor’s son portrayed himself as pro-life democrat, as took away some of Santorum’s natural base. People were really hoping that Casey’s son was a chip off of the old block. He is not. Senator Casey doesn’t know how to make the principled stands that his father did.
    I think against any other candidate Santorum probably would have kept his seat, but you cannot underestimate how much PA loved Governor Casey.

    Report Post »  
    • GeorgieJo
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 11:44pm

      Sillary Clinton would never allow any pro life person near her. Rumor has it she carrys Margaret Sangers book everywhere she goes.

      OMG in 2012

      Report Post »  
    • Go-rin-no-sho
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 7:09am

      I actually have personal experience with Rick and his “method of campaigning”: and how he vehemently opposed Pat Toomey AND the Tea Party to support Arlen Specter. I lived in Monroe County. He‘s another Republican ’Yes-Man’ and I really do not like him.

      Report Post » Go-rin-no-sho  
  • jb.kibs
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:15pm

    Here’s some info for ya about the GOP Primary.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=4c53SmbeaSo

    Report Post »  
    • Baddoggy
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:19pm

      100% correct sir!

      The sheeple will never get it, but it is the truth about delegates.
      They might be really suprised at the Convention…

      Report Post » Baddoggy  
  • Baddoggy
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:13pm

    It is all going to boil down to a brokered Convention. Newt and Santorum CANNOT get enough delegates because they are not on enough State ballots. Only Romney or Paul can secure enough delegates because they are on all State ballots. I do not understand why the MSM and the BLAZE are not pointing this out…

    Oh wait…I know, they don’t want Ron Paul because they think he is crazy and dangerous…Well sheeple, we need a little crazy and dangerous instead of the STUPID status quo of Romney, Newt or Santorum prevails…They are Obama lite…

    Wake up America!
    Vote for the Radical!
    Ron Paul 2012

    Report Post » Baddoggy  
  • OlefromMN
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:00pm

    I have been very vocal in my support of Newt. But after my caucus (in which I supported Newt) I am seeing a great opportunity in Rick. My concerns about Rick were based on experience and ability to handle a hostile Congress. Newt had the ability to deal with that aspect. If Rick can get Newt on his team it is game over for Obama. I also see Rick asking Paul Ryan to be on the team. Newt already has Bolton and others. It is far from a given that Mitt is the chosen one.

    Report Post » OlefromMN  
    • jb.kibs
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:14pm

      it’s all about the delegates. ;)

      Report Post »  
    • HermanHusband
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 11:04pm

      I think you will see that you will be one of many who will be jumping from Newt to Santorum. Newt will never get the Beck fan crowd, combined with Newt’s past positive comments on FDR, and his personal indescretions that are simply too much for me. Newt’s smart — but we are not hiring a debator, we are hiring someone who is going to be under great pressure to sell out — so who has enough character to not sellout? That group is a VERY short list — it sure is not Newt — not with the problems that are coming.

      Report Post »  
  • Roo-Dee
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:00pm

    No one but Ron Paul for me!

    Report Post » Roo-Dee  
    • jb.kibs
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:12pm

      yeah, ron paul is winning delgate, these chumps have no clue how to run a campaign…
      Paul either wasn’t invited to CPAC this year, or just didn’t go… he has won it 2 times in a row, so it’s weird why he would choose not to go if that is the case.

      Also, i hear CPAC this year compares to this.
      It’s like going to a sweet house party one year, so you decide to go the next and it ends up like a library. That is CPAC without Ron Paul. EPIC FAIL.

      Report Post »  
    • TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 8:59am

      JB KIBS. The Ron Paul version of the Democratic Party is finally realizing it/he doesn’t have much in common with Conservatives. Well, he’s known that all along. but refuses to admit it. We know it.

      Report Post » TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12  
    • West Coast Patriot
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 12:01pm

      Ron Paul won the last two CPAC straw polls, but you just discount him like he has nothing to contribute, just because he will not be dictatorial enough for your liking and go around the world killing muslims for you. Pathetic.

      Report Post » West Coast Patriot  
    • GodsavethePeasants
      Posted on February 13, 2012 at 1:59am

      Yea, he doesn’t want all drugs legalized, or want to withdraw into some little tinfoil hat shell as if the world is same as b4 WWII and terrorist couldn’t reach here effectively. Oh yea, he also believes in the warnings of our founders that a self-governed society is doomed to failure unless its people are religious and moral. Your poll bs is simply that, someone else posted the Rasmussen poll I had heard of where Rick is closer than Mitt to Obama.

      Report Post »  
  • rienheart
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:58pm

    SE CUPP is for ME

    Report Post »  
    • THXll38
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:03pm

      Do you enjoy her secularist/atheist views as well?

      Report Post » THXll38  
    • ModerationIsBest
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 3:27am

      She’s so sexy, lol.

      Report Post »  
    • justangry
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 1:49pm

      Yes she’s pretty. Not as much as some of you make her out to be. But then she starts talking and I just don’t see a lot of substance there. She’s like a robot programmed with a semi-decent vocabulary parroting her boss’s rhetoric. And as for the vocabulary… get some word of the day toilet paper or something. You can only say “existential” so many times before one wonders if that’s the only big word you know.

      Report Post » justangry  
  • GoodStuff
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:53pm

    Look at the polls people! Newt and Santorum are the 30′s when up against Obama!

    They have no chance!

    Romney, right now is 42-44% to Obama’s 45-47%.

    Romney is our best shot, warts and all.

    Romney/West 2012.

    Report Post »  
    • jb.kibs
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:14pm

      ah, Goldman Sachs vs Goldman Sachs is our “best shot”, our “best” is to keep doing the same thing over and over again… i see.. gotcha…

      Report Post »  
    • Faith1029
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:22pm

      GOODSTUFF: “Look at the polls people! Newt and Santorum are the 30′s when up against Obama!”

      Look at the polls??? No one polled me. No one polled my sons or their inlaws. No one polled my 5 sisters and their families and no one polled their friends. No one polled my brother or his 6 kids and their families. My mother never got a call. No one polled any of my friends. You are drinking the Media Kool-aid.

      Report Post »  
    • West Coast Patriot
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 3:04am

      Goodstuff, Where did you get that poll? This is from Rassmussen Reports Feb. 10, 2012:

      “In a potential Election 2012 matchup, the president attracts 50% of the vote and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney 40%. This is the largest lead the president has enjoyed against Romney in regular polling going back more than a year. It’s also the first time that the president has reached the 50% level of support against Romney.”

      “Rick Santorum now trails the president by four percentage points, 46% to 42%. Rasmussen Reports will now be tracking the Obama-Santorum race on a daily basis.”

      Report Post » West Coast Patriot  
    • TEXASGRANNY73
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 4:09am

      Quite frankly we the other people are tired of same old same old 3 or 4 states and it’s a given. We want the same opportunity to decide. And then we circle the wagons.

      Report Post »  
    • Ohio Guy
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 7:57am

      Latest Rasmussen poll in Ohio has Obama beating Romney by 4 and tied with Santorum. About polls have you noticed that Santorum consistently out performs the polls when votes are actually cast. Sometimes by a little like in NH and FL but sometimes by a lot like in IA, MO, and MN. I am a Santorum supporter but would like to see Paul continue to do well so here is hoping that Paul wins the ME caucuses.

      Report Post » Ohio Guy  
    • SamIamTwo
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 8:17am

      Not a pole watcher myself as I know it changes day by day…pfft

      Report Post » SamIamTwo  
    • cykonas
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 1:02pm

      @Faith1029
      Amen to your post. The polls only mean something if you believe they mean something. I see so much on here that is merely parroted from the talking points of one pundit or another. There is very little original thought displayed. Your post suggests to me that you have developed the ability to think for yourself. Let’s hope there are more of the parrots develop that ability before November.

      Report Post » cykonas  
    • West Coast Patriot
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 1:33pm

      That is true, polls are skewed. When I was young, I worked for a telemarketing company and did some polls. The questions were designed to take you in a certain direction and then some questions were taken out from the results. They really are designed for the sheeple.

      Report Post » West Coast Patriot  
  • nojoke
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:49pm

    You had me at S.E. CUPP :)

    Report Post »  
  • Brad in Victoria
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:42pm

    I’m supporting Santorum. but I’m surprised that no one has wrote just how beautiful S.E. looks.

    Report Post »  
    • Exrepublisheep
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:59pm

      Or that in the start of the video you can see thru her top. I’m sure she had NO idea that would happen.

      Report Post » Exrepublisheep  
  • Celeste.Christi
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:38pm

    Yes, a plug for Romney. These people are ignorant. ‘Romney’ has run against ‘Obama’ five times since WWII. Romney lost every time.

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/author/lawrence-b.-lindsey?page=1

    Report Post » Celeste.Christi  
  • SoulReaver
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:33pm

    I like Rick as the total package but he won’t beat Obama and I know Glenn thinks that a broom stick would beat Obama but his campaign is good and he beat Hilary who is a better politician than all of our guys combined. For some reason his followers believe what he says no matter what it is. it is like he does the jedi mind trick on the masses. He went to a racist church for 20 years he waves his hand I am not a racist and they believe him. That is what we are up against.
    I am form Illinois and saw him destroy Alan Keys who was a great conservative, that ran on the constitution and Declaration of Independence. I still think that Newt is the only one coming up with fresh ideas. That are not suicidal.
    They are all touting repeal obama care Newt is the only one that has helped to get republicans other than himself elected, and that is what it is going to take. that is why bills are a big deal to repeal them you basically need to prove it is unconstitutional or get a majority vote in both houses of congress and a republican. Newt is the only one acknowledging this.
    His baggage scares the hell out of me but the middle is not going to vote for Rick.

    Report Post » SoulReaver  
    • qpwillie
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:47pm

      “….but the middle is not going to vote for Rick”

      That’s the way the Republican establishment thinks. The same kind of thinking that brought us John McCain in 2008. That worked out really well, don’t you think?

      Report Post » qpwillie  
    • CatB
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:00pm

      Yes .. I am not willing to have a REPEAT of 2008 (with another McLame candidate i.e. Romney) .. Santorum CAN WIN!

      OMG 2012!

      Report Post »  
    • Baddoggy
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:17pm

      Newt destroyed Alan Keys? That statement alone proves you are NOT a Conservative..You need to go to a chiropractor…you are leaning so far left you think you are right.

      Report Post » Baddoggy  
    • Faith1029
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:29pm

      QPWILLIE: ““….but the middle is not going to vote for Rick”

      That’s the way the Republican establishment thinks. The same kind of thinking that brought us John McCain in 2008. That worked out really well, don’t you think?”

      Romney has been campaigning for how many years now? Lost the last time but suddenly he is the one to beat Obama this time? You may think people won’t vote for Rick, but there are many people who won’t vote for a Mormon.

      Report Post »  
    • SoulReaver
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 1:28am

      @baddogey Read much? I was talking about about Obama and his machine. They are formidable and the repubs are all over the place.
      all you people on Ricks band wagon name 5 policies he wants to implement…..thought so

      Same thing for romney name 5 policies that he plans on implementing

      Think for yourselves we need solutions Newt rattles off 15 solutions that are workable every time he is interviewed by someone without an axe to grind.

      Perry, Cain, Palin, and a slew of others realize this. NONE of the other candidates are talking solutions. pointing out what obama is doing wrong is not a solution.

      I love Ricks character but his only solution is 0%tax on manufacturing, the rest is what obama is doing wrong.
      Blame Newt for dreaming big but that is what we need right now. SOLUTIONS, SOLUTIONS.

      If your house was on fire would you want a bunch of people coming around and saying yep your house is on fire. Or would you want to know how to put it out.
      Think Think Think for yourselves

      Report Post » SoulReaver  
    • skt
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 2:01am

      I think Mitt Romney is the best and most honest candidate we have. He has not been caught up in the Washington D.C. politics as have all of the other candidates. He knows how to handle finances. He is a God fearing man of faith. It is so sad to hear and see so many people who are against “Mormons” because of what their ministers have told them. What are you so afraid of? Find out for yourself. Mitt Romney has never had an affair, never been reprimanded or voted most corrupt of anything. We need someone we can believe in. Not someone like Santorum who says he supports the Tea Party and then doesn’t. We need someone who tells the truth. Don’t judge a man by his religion that you probably know nothing about from your OWN knowledge, and not what someone else tells you to believe.

      Report Post »  
    • Hossua
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 2:15am

      SKT: Romney’s big banker backing concerns me more than his mormon faith.

      Report Post »  
    • Ohio Guy
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 8:02am

      “I am form Illinois and saw him destroy Alan Keys who was a great conservative, that ran on the constitution and Declaration of Independence”
      The explanation of that victory is right there in your statement. Keys ran as a conservative on the constitution in Illinois. I repeat in Illinois!

      Report Post » Ohio Guy  
  • blamelessace5
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:30pm

    I think its sad when were more into how the candidate speaks and if hes electable than how he stands on the issues.

    SAD

    Report Post » blamelessace5  
    • Go-rin-no-sho
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 7:19am

      Sometimes you have to put yourself in the shoes of the one making the decision, then work from there.

      Report Post » Go-rin-no-sho  
  • disenlightened
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:10pm

    It’s the economy, stupid. That leaves us with one choice: Romney.

    Report Post » disenlightened  
    • lukerw
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:25pm

      To stimulate the Economy, Regulation (Limit) must removed… and this includes RomneyCare / ObamaCare!

      Report Post » lukerw  
    • Go-rin-no-sho
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 7:18am

      If you’re voting on the economy, voting Goldman Sachs doesn’t sound like a good idea.

      Report Post » Go-rin-no-sho  
    • disenlightened
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 7:41am

      @GO-RIN-NO-SHO
      What you said makes zero sense. You couldn’t explain it if you tried. It’s just a cheap, liberal throw-away line.

      Report Post » disenlightened  
    • SamIamTwo
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 8:13am

      Go-rin-no-sho

      And who do you think Obama surrounds himself with??? You are tripping dood.

      Report Post » SamIamTwo  
  • spirited
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:05pm

    Ah ha …..,

    > a plug for Romney.

    Report Post » spirited  
  • THXll38
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:05pm

    You go Ricky the Warmonger! I love warmongering, spreading the US version of democracy, nation building, getting young men and women killed for the spread of the US version of democracy; I love spending trillions on a war we cannot afford, but most of all, I love his social conservative nutty statist values and how he will INCREASE the size of government!

    Ricky the Warmonger 2012!!!

    Report Post » THXll38  
    • MightyMouth
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 1:07am

      Screw you!

      Report Post » MightyMouth  
    • SamIamTwo
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 8:09am

      Yeah, you prob like how Obama has handled the mess in the middle east…he started the uprising by letting them know they should rise up…now Obama is faced with the a mess that can not be handled by any nation. It will be WWIII…and Obama will go down in history, if they write it correctly, as the WORST PRESIDENT EVAR!!!!!

      Jimmy Bob Carter did the same thing and we ended up having to send in troops later.

      Pay attention dood, it is almost always that the dems screw up and the republicans (the adults) come in to correct the screw ups.

      Report Post » SamIamTwo  
    • TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 8:53am

      “Warrrrrrr-Mongerrrrrrrrrrrrr” I hear the Democrat Party in your rant……. and so goes a Ron Paul supporter.

      Report Post » TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12  
    • Legionnaire of the Republic
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 10:03am

      Ya I wish we had some warmongers right after WW2. We could have helped Nationalist China defeat Communist China. The world would be a better place. It we had did that, we probably wouldn’t had to go to Korea and Vietnam.

      Report Post » Legionnaire of the Republic  
1 2 3

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love