DC Comics Relaunches the Original Green Lantern as a Gay Superhero
- Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:26pm by
Madeleine Morgenstern
- Print »
- Email »

DC Comics
Alan Scott, the original Green Lantern, is being reintroduced to the DC Comics universe with one major change: He’s gay.
The big reveal officially comes Wednesday in the second issue of DC’s “Earth 2” series, which features Scott as the main superhero of a parallel world. Scott, who first appeared in a 1940 comic, is getting a new origin story as a young media mogul as part of DC’s universe-wide reboot.
DC confirmed the news about the character Friday after co-publisher Dan Dido told a convention audience in May that a heretofore straight character would be gay.
“He’s going to be the leader of the team, this dynamic hero, he’ll do anything to save people, the bravest man on the planet. Why not just make him gay as well?” writer James Robinson told USA Today.

DC Comics

DC Comics
Explaining the decision in an interview with Entertainment Weekly, Robinson said the original version of Alan Scott was an older man with a super-powered son, Obsidian, who was gay.
“The fact that Scott was young now [due to the reboot] meant Obsidian no longer existed. I thought it was a shame that DC was losing such a positive gay character. I said, ‘Why not make Alan Scott gay?’ To Dan DiDio’s credit, when I suggested it to him, there wasn’t a moment’s hesitation,” he said.
Robinson told the New York Post the character’s new sexual orientation has no bearing on his heroism.
“He’s very much the character he was. He’s still the pinnacle of bravery and idealism. He’s also gay,” Robinson said.
“It’s a realistic depiction of society,” he added. “You have to move with the times.”
DC’s announcement comes shortly after Marvel Comics said it would be featuring the first gay wedding between two of its characters.
One Million Moms, an online activist group that has targeted JC Penny for its hiring of Ellen DeGeneres as a spokeswoman, took up a campaign after the initial announcement urging supporters to email DC and Marvel about the character developments.
“[U]rge them to change and cancel all plans of homosexual superhero characters immediately. Ask them to do the right thing and reverse their decision to have sexual orientation displayed to readers,” the group wrote.





















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (416)
KusoJiJi
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:56pmIndoctrinate, indoctrinate, indoctrinate!!!!
Report Post »Stink Fist
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:00pmi wonder who gets tops
Report Post »Locked
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:00pmI for one am SHOCKED that a heavily muscled man running around in spandex turns out to be gay. Who could have seen that coming?
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:01pmAnd, recruit, recruit, recruit.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:06pmActually LOCKED…the Justice Society Green Lantern of reguarly DC publishing doesn’t wear the familar “union suit” you’re alluding to. Look up Alan Scott Green Lantern rather my describing his uniform to you.
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:08pm@RJJinGadsden
Yesterday you said, ““Also, stick with your theory too.”
Which theory? The one I’m considering discussing with Teddlybar?
Report Post »Locked
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:12pm@Avengerk
Seeing two types of outfits; the skin-tight red-and-green one, and the skin-tight black and green one. I‘m not sure if they’re spandex; they both completely form to the contours of the body.
I suppose I should say “A guy who runs around with his bulge showing through a skin-tight outfit turned out to be gay? SHOCKING!” Better?
Report Post »gotoneon
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:12pmwhy are we growing morally corrupt by leaps and bounds? America has truly seen it’s better days.
Report Post »cessna152
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:12pmThe “Gay Lantern”… the FLAME is lit!
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:13pmComic Books are not Mandatory! Just say NO!
Comic Books are not real, they are made up by fiction writers, and if you “quote” them you are quoting the author and letterer, not the “character!”
Does D&D have any LGBT monsters?
LOL
Report Post »hidden_lion
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:24pmI guess he will now have to go by the name “the Pink lantern”
Report Post »Favored93
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:25pmWow….I have been a green lantern fan sense I was about 5…I now have 2 small boys my oldest will be 5 this August. We sat down and watched the green lantern movie together even though the bad guy was a bit scary for him but the boy LOVED the movie. You guys should see him running around the house with his super hero mask the joy I get from watching him is immeasurable!
Report Post »This story however has totally RUINED one of my favorite hero stories. My sons will NEVER be allowed to see this comic. What they have done and are doing to our kids is despicable and absolutely wicked. DC should be put out of business over this what an outrage!
TSUNAMI-22
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:29pm@ cessna152
The “Gay Lantern”… the FLAME is lit!
Report Post »~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Pardon me whilst I clean the spit coffee from my keyboard….but I think you meant “the FLAMER is lit”. LOL
AvengerK
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:33pmYou can fixate on any bulges in their pants LOCKED..that’s your prerogative champ.
Report Post »TSUNAMI-22
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:34pmI wonder if they’ll give the character a lisp as well? What will the new Lantern use as a weapon….harsh language, cold mochachino’s and dirty rainbows?
Report Post »KeystoneState
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:40pmAnd Marvel is cleaning up at the theaters, go figure.
Report Post »hcartexas
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:40pmSilly me… but Comic books always seemed “Gay” to me.
Report Post »black9897
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:44pmAlways been more of a marvel, spiderman guy myself. But checked out GL a few times. He’s not supposed to be gay.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:47pmKEYSTONESTATE….July’s “The Dark Knight Rises” is highly anticipated and likely to do just as good business as the Avengers.
Report Post »VoteBushIn12
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:48pmIt‘s only indoctrination if you teach them it’s ok to be gay? What if you teach them it’s not ok to be gay? Is that indoctrination?
What about if you teach them that Jesus is Lord? Isn’t that a form of indoctrination… in it’s like, ya know, most LITERAL sense. I.e., “teaching someone to accept doctrines uncritically.”
Careful how freely you use that word without first doing a little introspection.
Report Post »Sirfoldallot
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:52pmThe kissing wasn’t in the old comics let alone same sex kissing ; WTH, the weidoz r taking over. Wounder if they think the muslim world will welcome there weirdness.
Report Post »TSUNAMI-22
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:55pm@ VoteBushIn12
It‘s only indoctrination if you teach them it’s ok to be gay? What if you teach them it’s not ok to be gay? Is that indoctrination?
What about if you teach them that Jesus is Lord? Isn’t that a form of indoctrination… in it’s like, ya know, most LITERAL sense. I.e., “teaching someone to accept doctrines uncritically.”
Careful how freely you use that word without first doing a little introspection.
Report Post »~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It’s possible that its silently agreed upon that indoctrination is just that when it leads to the perpetuation of immoral behavior.
Wildblue3
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 3:03pmGuys, I don’t agree with it either. If you want to write Dan Dido.who is editor of the book, I have his contact information. I personally don’t mind characters which are gay if they started that way. I don’t like this where they have taken someone straight and on a whim of political correctness, made them gay. Please DON’T let this drive your kids away from comics. They are good normally. The regular GL is still straight.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 3:12pm@Avengerk
And it’s your prerogative to know not only the type of skin-tight outfits superheroes wear, but also the material of which they are made! Sounds like you have an eye for fabulous superheroes, bud!
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 3:22pmIt is so cute to see Avenger K get prissy about a fictitious comic book hero’s wardrobe… It humanizes him!
WWARD?
Report Post »MAMMY_NUNN
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 3:33pmDoes anyone remember the Ambigously Gay Duo ?
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 3:33pm@WILDBLUE
Report Post »It’s no wonder why DC got rid of their “letters” pages. I wonder if Astonishing X-Men still has one?
AvengerK
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 3:51pmLOCKED…don‘t get snippy because you’re the one fixating on tight spandex and crotch bulges champ. That’s your prerogative.
Report Post »booger71
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 3:52pmVoteBushIn12
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:48pm
It‘s only indoctrination if you teach them it’s ok to be gay? What if you teach them it’s not ok to be gay? Is that indoctrination?
Report Post »——————————
When you tout something not normal as normal, yet it is indoctrination.
johnjamison
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 3:56pmP.C. Comics seems a more fitting name
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 3:58pmTHE TRUTH THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION WANTS TO GLOSS OVER:
=> “In 2009, male-on-male sex (MMS) accounted for 79% of infections among all newly infected men.
=> In 2010, in the 46 states with long-term confidential, name-based reporting, MMS accounted for 78% of estimated HIV diagnoses among all males aged 13 years and older.
=> Young people aged 13–29 accounted for 39% of all new HIV infections in 2009
=> With regard to youth, HIV disproportionately affects young gay and bisexual men and young African Americans.”
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/msm/index.htm
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/youth/index.htm
Note 1: The 2010 stat for MMS HIV contagion (78%) decreases to 51% for the OVERALL population, because bisexuals spread HIV to females (23%) who comprise 51% of the population. There’s no category for heterosexual males to assess contagion from infected females, but who cares about hetero males anyway.
Note 2: No CDC stats since Feb. 2011, and stats for 2010 are not as comprehensive as those for 2009. I wonder why.
Never mind the staggering stats. Instead, let’s write cool comics to entice our boys, turn the pervs into superheroes, and cover up the ugly truth — depraved liberal style.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 4:26pm@Avengerk
“don‘t get snippy because you’re the one fixating on tight spandex and crotch bulges champ.”
Anyone else get a little uncomfortable thinking of Avengerk using “crotch bulges” and “snippy” in the same sentence?
I am honestly impressed that you know so much about superhero costumes though. Hobby of yours?
Report Post »crackerone
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 4:52pmPeter Pan for the first threesome!
Report Post »turkey13
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 5:01pmCome on Blaze we didn’t need to see that kissing picture. I almost lost my dinner! Now when I buy my 4 grand sons comics at Hastings there will be no more action fugure comics and I will have to explain why.My sons recently took them to the movies and that is all they have been talking about. Well I suppose I can buy Donald Duck until he comes out of the closet. I’m kinda hopeing the comic will go full blast and both the Qu_eers will get AIDS and die and then I can buy the back issues.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 5:06pmYeah..that’s always a good plan LOCKED..appeal to the board for help.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 5:23pmTURKEY13…just stay away from DC’s EARTH 2 and BATWOMAN (she’s a lesbian character with a penchant for trolling Gotham City PD) and you can be relatively confident that your kids will be free from the overt liberal propaganda.
Report Post »One funny thing, DC took a heterosexual cop in Gotham City “Rene Montoya” and shoe-horned her into being a homosexual so that the Batwoman character can have a girlfriend at one point.
Marvel’s X-Men is having a homosexual wedding this month so keep that one on the “avoid” list as well. They’re using variant covers so be alert.
If you stick to the basic Detective Comics, Batman, The Dark Knight, Superman, Action Comics, Justice League…your kids can enjoy their comics free from the propagandizing of these liberal goons. Although Grant Morrison is writing Superman right now as some kind of “hero of the proliteriate”. He’s usually a great writer though.
Batman right now is being written by an amazing writer named Scott Snyder and drawn by artist Greg Capullo…these guys are doing incredble stories and your kids will enjoy them. But the’re very edgy and dark. So if they’re really young use your discretion.
Be also aware..DC no longer adheres to the Comics Code which means the stories no longer have to be suitable for young audiences.
You have to remember TURKEY13, you’re dealing with artists and writers, a community notoriously populated by liberals. Some of them don’t shove their agenda in your face..some do.
Bruce P.
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 5:32pmFAVORED — the Green Lantern of the movie and the Alan Scott Green Lantern (who is gay) are not the same character.
Report Post »Bruce P.
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 5:35pmAVENGERK — The Grant Morrison run on Action Comics is trying to portray (a younger) Superman as in his original stories, more of a “hero of the people” than the godlike “Earth’s Greatest Hero” that he will become when he becomes more mature.
Report Post »Independent4233
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 5:35pmLocked
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:00pm
“I for one am SHOCKED that a heavily muscled man running around in spandex turns out to be gay. Who could have seen that coming?”
Gloat while you can, twink. We’re heading toward payback time, and you won’t like it one bit.
Corrupting our children is getting close to critical mass.
Are you going to celebrate by putting on your pink jumpsuit and go swishing down the street?
Report Post »jds7171
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 5:37pmI wonder if Ryan Renolds will be playing in the new Green Lantern now?
Report Post »NHwinter
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 6:22pmhttp://www.mullerover.com/2012/05/23/what-honor-looks-like-the-flash-mob-at-gate-38-of-reagan-national-airport/
If you want to see real heros, cut and paste the above in your browser. It is worth the time. A true tribute to our heros
Report Post »markThatcher
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 6:25pmI beg to disagree, it is not indoctrination, it is real-world life. Ther have been and always will be “gay” people, probably even a family member. I have been with my male partner for 26 yrs., have a 26 yr oldadopted son, who is in the US Army and I am a 7 yr caregiver for my paralyzed“husband”. I am a God fearing, Jesus believing man who did not choose to be gay. God made me this way to expose the intolerance of one human to another. God Bless and say a prayer for yourself.
Report Post »SaintzOfAk
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 6:29pmWelcome to “The great mystery Babylon”…our end draws quickly nigh.
Report Post »beckwasfox
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 6:49pmWhy not just revamp the character further and add a couple of sidekicks. He could be The Green s o d o m i t e and have a couple of sidekicks called the b u t t brothers.
I tease h o m o s e x u a l s alot cuz they h o m o s e x u a l s.-Eddie Murphy
Report Post »koyettsu
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 7:13pmWell that is the end of the Green Lantern.
Report Post »The Gooch
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 7:14pmSales will tell how wise a move this was. If they go up, look for a spate of other “alternative” heroes. If they remain stable, no one will much care. If they go down, well, look for spin and attacks on comic readers. Time will tell.
Report Post »Suddenly the Planned Parentood Superheroine is overshadowed.
Hell, Marvel had an openly gay character for decades… and he is apparently now a regular X-Man. Polaris? North Star? Some dude from Canada….
Unix
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 7:32pmBlech! Liberals are changing everything to fit their master plan. I go news for them all…
Report Post »TheCoffinMaker
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 8:24pmFrom the minds of the demented.
Report Post »woodyb
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 9:01pmNext week we will have a gay Lone Ranger and a gay Matt Dillon!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »The_Almighty_Creestof
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 9:10pmLike every conquering civilization throughout time, they take important dates of those they’ve defeated and blend them with their own to aclimate, indoctrinate and control the masses.
DC could have created a brand new “super hero” with a gay leaning…but instead they take a character already beloved by generations of comic book readers and pull this crap.
It does not take much to see their agenda.
Report Post »Browncoat359
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 9:58pmFirst of all you’re all thinking of the WRONG CHARACTER. This Green Lantern was the first character by that name and he is quite different than the one you’re thinking of.
This is not the GL that was portrayed by Ryan Reynolds,this GL is not a member of an intergalactic police force,this GL was not given his ring by a nearly dead alien.
The character in question is shown here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Scott
Honestly though,DC is patting itself on the back for taking a character that has very,very,rarely been in the public eye for the last 40 years and is NOT a mainstream character and making him gay. They act as though this is a brave decision but it isn’t. Taking a character that is almost completely unknown to those outside of comics fandom (this article & many of the responses to it demonstrate that point) is not being bold;it is taking the easy approach to solving a perceived ‘problem’. Remember that this is the “New 52” version of DC,a brand new interpretation of the DC Universe where the back stories of the characters have been altered/erased just because the writers didn’t want to work very hard to tell interesting stories anymore. When the company decides to switch back to the original version of the DCU they’ll make Alan Scott straight again and none of this will have mattered.
Report Post »“Brave” would have been taking one of their mainline characters (Superman,i.e.) during the original timeline and revealing them as gay. They couldn’t easily change t
Deepdiver58
Posted on June 2, 2012 at 8:45amyep. you are so correct. The progressives will do anything, say anything, cheat, steal, re-write history, and take over the education system just to have their way.
Disgusting and perverted – what do you expect from the left?
Report Post »VoteBushIn12
Posted on June 2, 2012 at 9:10am@TSUNAMI-22 and @BOOGER71
That would entirely depend on YOUR definition of “morality” and “normality” now wouldn’t. Standards you developed when you were indoctrinated.
If you lived your how life believing Gay was normal and moral then you would take no issue with this comic. But, because you were raised believing the contrary (probably because of your bigoted, narrow minded parents), you believe it’s “immoral”, “not normal”, and therefore “indoctrination”
I was raised my entire life to be a good person and to evaluate the world as fairly as possible. So naturally I see no issue with this comic (because it is not a “doctrine” that is being evaluated uncritically, but rather much the opposite), but I do see religion as indoctrination. Not to say indoctrination is bad or good, but just objectively identifying the areas where it exists.
Your turn.
Report Post »Rashomon
Posted on June 2, 2012 at 9:42amwill they rename him the “Green *****”? (People will wonder if hr uses it for that)
Report Post »turkey13
Posted on June 2, 2012 at 12:03pm@MarkThatcher You said you was a Qu_eer all your life abd was with your husband for those years. You also said you was Christian and God fearing person. Go to Roman 1 Ver. 26 – 32. In Ver 32 – it says, “Who knowing the judgement of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.” This has a form in the Koran that ids simular and thast is why the Q_ueers over there are beheaded or stoned to death.
Report Post »The Gooch
Posted on June 2, 2012 at 12:30pmVoteBushIn12
Report Post »Geesh, I don’t know about you being a good person but it is evident you sure think highly of yourself. Good for you. We all like our own brand, don’t we?
The word “normal” has a set definition, generally meaning that which is expected. Homosexuality is not normal from a strictly mathematical perspective; it is statistically anomalous behavior that can only be redefined as ‘normal’ if ‘normal’ no longer means “the usual or average”. Normal does not mean acceptable or tolerable.
As for morality, there has been generally a distaste for embracing homosexuality as unquestionably socially acceptable across time, religions, cultures (some very secular), races, & geography. People can recognize that gays exist, but being gay isn‘t ’normal’ in ANY culture.
I don’t believe homosexuals are evil & need to purged. They are fringe group trying to make their way thru life… like the rest of us, but they want to play house with their own sex. I can tolerate them. I really don’t give too hot, steaming craps about their private business. I also don’t accept they are somehow special and deserve to be venerated. Gays should not be entertained (being a statistical anomaly defined by behavior) as a special, protected class that is allowed to redefine terms to make them feel better. Does all that make me or any other non-homicidal person morally superior or inferior to you? Nope. Like you, were just people with opinions… not special authority.
Michelle44
Posted on June 2, 2012 at 12:42pmThis is so WHACKED !! NOT NORMAL.. why people keep getting this crap shoved down their throats..trying to make others think this is normal.. NOT NORMAL… AND I am sick of this being exposed to children, like the JC PENNEY advertisement..Lets hear it for the GAY DADS..BLAH BLAH BLAH… if U want to be GAY that’s fine,, but it’s not normal, if so we would all be GAY,,
Report Post »NOT NORMAL..
Zaggynuts
Posted on June 2, 2012 at 2:55pm@markThatcher
So you claim to be God fearing; that is utter non-sense. You did and still do choose to be gay, as there is NO scientific proof that there is a “gay gene” (besides of course a “study” by a homosexual scientist) The human genome project found no such gene while mapping human DNA. On to the God fearing remark you made. If you truly fear God you would change your little lifestyle choice and follow His word. Until that day comes you and your sex partner are not Godly men.
You speak of the real world, but what you are missing is the real world does not accept you; hell just look at voting results. Every-time Americans vote to normalize your little pretend family, you get a resounding NO You are not and will never be normal. Your lifestyle choice is not only against God, it is against your own biology.
Report Post »pavepaws
Posted on June 2, 2012 at 3:11pmI thought it was the Silver Surfer, or the flaming Human Flame.
Report Post »XScramblerX
Posted on June 3, 2012 at 11:33amThe Green Lantern’s new line is “ STOP RIGHT THERE OR I”LL BEND YOU OVER BIG GUY!”
Report Post »Will not be buying any of this crap for my kids(nephews, grand kids.)
Just because of some idiots’ decision to make “being GAY a right” doesn’t make it right!
What’s next?…Batman has received his new NAMBLA membership….or maybe
Superman can save you, just spread your legs and he will give you an abortion with his laser
vision!!
The World Has Gone MAD!
I WILL NOT COMPLY!
sportstutters
Posted on June 3, 2012 at 7:58pm\My 5 year old son will never get another dc comic. period!!!
Report Post »4GODUSAANDISRAEL
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:54pmSomething tells me that Ryan Renolds won’t be playing the Green Lantern if there is a sequal.
Report Post »Hcube-TheMan
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:07pmYou’d be right, but not because this character is gay. See this character is Alan Scott not Hal Jordan, which was the green lantern Ryan Renolds played.
Report Post »4GODUSAANDISRAEL
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:29pmI never saw the movie or read the comics, i thought the green lantern is the green lantern. just like batman is batman, superman is superman, etc, etc,etc.
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 3:04pmGuess whom hates… Stan Lee & Sheldon Cooper?
Report Post »Meyvn
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:54pmReally GAY!
Report Post »Smokey_Bojangles
Posted on June 2, 2012 at 10:48pm“Quick, Alan Scott! We are being Invaded by Space Aliens!Put On your ring!:
Report Post »“I uh…Seemed to have misplaced It Somewhere…”
“Where? The Earth Needs you and that ring!”
“Well..Let me think.I was Over at my Boyfriends house watching American Idol.We were on the Couch.Then I inserted my finger in his..uh oh….”
“WHAT?”
“I just remembered where I left the ring….”
“Hope you guys did not eat Mexican food last night!!!”
Exrepublisheep
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:52pm*Rick Perry applauds*
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:52pmYea, good luck with that D.C. Bob Kane is rolling over in his grave.
Report Post »Jenny Lind
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 5:00pmGood luck with that was what I was thinking too. Are there really enough gay comic book readers to make that a win for the company? Geeez.
Report Post »Redwood Elf
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 5:21pmWell we’d always wondered about Bruce Wain…he was always hanging around with young boys and never got a serious girlfriend…
Report Post »Redwood Elf
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 5:24pmOops…misspelled Wayne.
While they’re at it, why don’t they change the character to the “Pink Lantern” and give the lantern a hammer and sickle on the side? Yeah, make him a gay communist pinko too.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on June 2, 2012 at 6:58amNot to mention that Catwoman keeps throwing herself at him and he never goes for it. I don’t want to think about it. He’s just focused on fighting crime.
Report Post »Silversmith
Posted on June 3, 2012 at 2:28pmYeah….nah — with what we see in the world today, who would believe a gay super hero fighting for anyone who wasn’t gay?
Silversmith
Report Post »Locked
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:51pmUnless I miss my guess, it’s not a relaunch of the “Original;” it’s an alternate universe, like the alternate universe where Spiderman is half-Hispanic and gay.
(Didn’t The Blaze also report on that, or was it just Beck? I forget.)
Report Post »poorrichard09
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:54pmOK, shouldn’t he be the Gay Lantern now? Or maybe the Rainbow Lantern. just sayin’
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:57pmIt’ the “Ultimate” universe. The Avengers in the movie are from the Ultimate universe. Spiderman is now a black kid. Not sure about Hispanic, as I quit buying it, but I know he’s not gay.
Report Post »ICEDRAGONNITE
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:57pmDoesn’t matter the Green Lantern just lost my family. 22 Grand kids.
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:05pm@ICEDRAGONNITE
Report Post »You don’t have to worry, this guy is not a Green Lantern and does not appear in any of the Green Lantern series. Just don’t buy the Earth 2 comic. I won’t be.
Locked
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:08pm@Anonymous
” Spiderman is now a black kid. Not sure about Hispanic, as I quit buying it, but I know he’s not gay.”
Looked it up, he’s half-black, half-Hispanic. The “gay” part was from a Drudge Report, which Beck then commented on after, complaining that they’re making him black, Hispanic, and gay. But I think you’re right, he’s just multi-racial, not gay.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spider-Man_(Miles_Morales)
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:13pmWhich super hero is going to wear a hoodie?
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:17pm@LOCKED
Report Post »Thanks! I quit buying it and I knew he was black, but not gay.
SquareHead
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 6:25pm@Locked back again in full rainbow attire!
Out promoting sodomy at every chance, in order to distract him from his own guilt laden soul.
What is your take on all the psycho cannibal mass murderers that are gay? You are out there promoting following your urges and try to satisfy whatever lust you have. When endless random sodomy with strangers in public bathrooms looses its thrill. Many gays seam to turn to pedophilia, in some cases necrophilia, or just killing people and eating them. All this to try to fulfill something that cannot be fulfilled.
The top six U.S. male serial k i l l e r s were all g a y :
• Donald Harvey claimed 37 victims in Kentucky;
• John Wayne Gacy r a p e d and k i l l e d 33 boys in Chicago,
• Patrick Kearney accounted for 32..
• Bruce Davis m o l e s t e d and k i l l e d 27 young men and boys in Illinois;
• A g a y s e x-m u r d e r-t o r t u r e ring (Corll-Henley-Brooks) killed 27 men and boys
• Juan Corona was convicted of m u r d e r i n g 25 migrant workers
L e s b i a n Aileen Wuornos laid claim in 1992 to “worst female k i l l e r” with at least 7 middle-aged male victims.
Almost forgot our beloved Jeffrey Dahlmer..
A study of 518 s e x u a l l y-tinged mass m u r d e r s in the U.S. from 1966 to 1983 determined that 350 (68%) of the victims were k i l l e d by gays and that 19 (44%) of the 43 m u r d e r e r s were b i-sexuals or gays.
Info provided by stage9 from the Luka Rocco Magnott
Report Post »sbenard
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:51pmThey just cut their market share in half — or less. I hope their happy with an agenda, but far fewer customers!
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:16pmHaw Haw Haw – What Would Ayn Rand Do?
WWARD?
((this is leading up to be the world’s worst weekend ever for the boys who use borrowed computers))
Report Post »Bobaz
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:50pmOnly morons read comic books anyway and that’s why the new sodomite, Green Lantern, will be popular with Liberals.
At some point, expect this to become part of the English Literature curriculum at most of the universities in this country.
Report Post »Favored93
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:33pmI am a huge comic book fan… or used to be… and am a conservative educated man.
Report Post »They were fun and entertaining.
As long as Jesus is your real life hero there is nothing wrong with comics.
DC however has lost my business. This is a heart breaking story because as a boy I enjoyed this comic and now my boys will not be allowed to read them.
alpha2omega47
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:50pmComic books for queers. I wouldn’t wipe my butt with any DC comic book. Give them to the college kids; they might relate to them.
Report Post »Excomunicatedmarine
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 3:37pmI’d be afraid to let them anywhere near my butt.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:48pmDC isn’t stupid enough (yet) to mess with bankable properties like Batman or Superman.
Report Post »Outside of the Batman titles…DC has been relying on gimmicks for a while now. Most readers expect the “New 52” line to be disolved within 12 months. There’s already a plot device entered into that universe to change back to normal continuity at some point. The “New 52” was meant to be a new start for DC’s characters…most sales have fizzled since it’s inception. New titles have been put in to replace them with less than enthusiastic responses to them. What happens to the “Earth 2” line once the “New 52” phase is over is too premature to say since only one “Earth 2” title has been published so far. My guess is sales will taper off as James Robinson has been a “so-so” writer for DC. For some perspective..Robinson is very liberal in his views and tries to put them into his writing. So pushing the homosexual agenda is no surprise knowing Robinson is behind it. DiDio has given publishing space to the “It gets better” campaign of militant homosexual Dan Savage. Savage you‘ll recall is the vile and angry homosexual who disparages christians and anyone that doesn’t adhere to his homosexual fantasies. But this is acceptable to DC publishing apparently.
SLOWBIDEN
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:00pmThey already announced Superman is going to come out of the closet….sorry
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:00pmHa ha ha.
TEE
Report Post »SerikFox
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:03pmIf they touch Batman or Superman they’re going to fail miserably and they know it. They’re the most famous superheroes of all time – it would be insane to make major changes to their characters.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:07pmSLOWBIDEN..but all means show me this “announcement”.
Report Post »SLOWBIDEN
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:10pmThey raelly did say superman is coming out the closet…. didn’t say i agreed with it… They had the article on the blaze last week.. check the archives
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:10pmThe “ha ha ha’s” make you look even more unhingedl than usual ENCINOM/MONICNE/SLEAZY HIPPO.
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:13pmBefore this announcement, I was wondering who it was going to be. I knew it wouldn’t be Supes or Batman, but I wondered if they’d make Wonder Woman a lesbian. I was a little worried about Aquaman, but he DOES have Mera.
Report Post »AmazingGrace8
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:17pm@slowbiden
Elimination of “the-phone-booths” so guess he would have to come out of the closet & not the phone-booth. LOL
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:20pm((Spits milk!)) “I DEMAND you show me that REFERENCE! You Blaspheme! ”
FauxVengerK – are you STILL angry that the Yanks stole the title “Avengers” for their boring comic book, when the Japanese Naruto Shippuden manga already HAD an Avenger K? (…and much nicer orchestrated action music…) ??
Riddle me this, “Who would win an all out battle, AvengerK or the Avengers?” (LOL)
Report Post »SLOWBIDEN
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:22pmSorry it wasn’t on the blaze it was on fox news http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2012/05/21/could-superman-be-gay-dc-comics-will-have-their-popular-characters-come-out/
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:45pmSLOWBIDEN…you’ve linked to the specualtion about which character DC was going to make homosexual before it was announced that the Alan Scott of “Earth 2” was going to be that character.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 3:01pmOh I get it MONICNE/ENCINOM/SLEAZY HIPPO…you’re still sore that I called you on your “hey everyone look at me..love me..give me attention“ post on the ”Bloomberg” board. Aww…sorry champ.
The one where you felt compelled to tell the world that if you run “this far” you’ll burn off “this much” while citing a veritable laundry list with “this drink” (making sure you quote the hipster dufus name for it) has “this many” calories with“ this much” fat content to gin up some “fitness” cred for this aging personality of yours. Adding all this to the fictional life you created for “MONICNE” where you claim you’re a 60 year old bag who “still” runs marathons along with the myriad philanthropic and financial successes you’ve touted for yourself at different times on the Blaze. But meanwhile…you have lots of time to sit around at the blaze posting as at least three different people throughout the day.
Report Post »Weekends..holidays…weekdays…you’re open 24/7 for lefty business. You BS-ing much?
MONICNE
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 3:32pmMaybe we really are several different people, you think? But that would make YOU paranoid, so “we” must be the same, eh, genius platy-site?
It is comical watching you rage on us strong American women – and it explains the problem you have with real women. (And women with personal wealth!)
Why did you leave Australia again? It wasn’t your cup of tea? Why should we think you are going to be faithful to the United States? You actually seem to be as big a troll and provocateur as you accuse others of every day (except weekends and holidays).
Off you go -Mate! Round now is the time you were a waltzin’ matilda fer me. Try not to break anything this time!
Taxed Enough Already, don’t need Wankers
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 3:54pmI’m glad I struck a nerve MONICNE/ENCINOM/SLEAZY HIPPO..you reflexively when to a defense posture and tried to distract from the fact that you infest these boards day in day out (not just weekdays) using at least three differrent log-in names to post with. Creepy lefty cur.
Report Post »Watermain
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:43pmI’ve never even read a Green Lantern comic and I still threw up in my mouth.
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:51pmThis guy isn’t a REAL Green Lantern and does not belong to the GL Corps. The Guardians wouldn’t have him now :-)
Report Post »subic
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 4:20pmIts sickening. Like liberals, gays have a mental disorder, anyone that would want to pack fudge on a member of the same sex is sick.
Report Post »MathiasLucas
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:42pmLOL This story is so gay :)
Report Post »CatB
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:46pmThis is going to make a good laugh on the Big Bang Theory next season .. BAZINGA!
Report Post »TheReasonableLib
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:41pmConservative homophobes get it wrong again; it’s another series. This is almost as bad as when you were up in arms over spider-man supposedly turning black and gay
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:59pmTHEREASONABLELIB, Nice try. Please explain in detail how you personally think that we have a persistent, irrational fear of homosexuals. I’ve had my hands on a number of them and it was in no way frightening for me. I would expect quite the opposite since I was arresting and processing them for sexually molesting under aged boys. They in no way cause me to have an irrational fear of them.
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:00pmWe aren’t afraid of you guys, we just don’t like you pushing your lifestyle choices on us. Keep what you do in the bedroom, in the bedroom. I don’t need to know about it.
Report Post »Blackhawk1
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:00pmTypical liberals. They can’t come up with anything new or original they have to do remakes. Just look at most movies being put out by Hollywierd.
Report Post »SLOWBIDEN
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:02pmYour name is an oxymoron
Report Post »mr.goodvibe
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:07pmLimp wrists don’t scare me althought a guy with white crust around his mouth and toilet paper breath would make me turn away.
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:08pm@BLACKHAWK
Report Post »Most Hollywierd movies coming out these days are from comic books. It’s the Hollywierd crowd who have lost their creativity.
RJJinGadsden
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:41pmY’know, The Green Lantern does certainly seem to be Dr Sheldon Cooper, aka Jim Parsons’ favorite comic crime fighter.
Report Post »The_Plumber_Says
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:40pmThese guys have just sealed their fate.
Report Post »Wanna read comics read Marvel
SwilkG
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:57pmactually marvel just announced their would be a gay x-men wedding. This is nothing new, the elites who control the media we entertain ourselves with have been implanting their social agendas for over 100 years now, and it shows. Pushing gayness on people has to do with a depopulation agenda, gays don‘t have kids because they can’t because its not natural. They have been pitting men and woman against one another for some time now. Want less people on earth make men and women hate each other and then promote gayness, it’s working because the evil is being accepted instead of being called out.
Report Post »mr.goodvibe
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:19pmIs it storm and gene gray?
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:21pmYeah, go read Astonishing X-Men #50.
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:22pmCheers!
WWARD?
Report Post »beckwasfox
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 6:37pmObama, the publishers and others that promote this reprobate behavior bear a responsibility in the tragedies that will unfold in people’s lives.
Report Post »The_Plumber_Says
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:39pmAdd your comments
Report Post »UpholderOftheConstitution
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:39pmAs the rest of the normal America laughs at this ridiculousness to sway people in to believing this crap. Classic liberal ideology.
Once again if this is natural why can’t gay couples reproduce within natural science to prolong the species? Like everything artificial they have to rely completely on technology. So stupid these people are it makes my logical head hurt.
Oh well Aquaman would have been too much of a dead ringer being gay. So no surprise moment.
Report Post »johnjamison
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:46pmAquaman is coming out and admitting he’s really loves fishdikks. The first beastality superhero.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:55pmI never trusted Aquaman. He always seemed a little light in his flippers to me.
Report Post »trevthomp
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:19pmActually, Aquaman is one of DC’s better titles right now.
This has managed to actually piss off everyone. Long time comic fans don’t like seeing 70 year old characters getting re-imagined every year. Non comic fans think the DC universe is turning gay. Gay fans can’t believe DC hyped up such an insignificant character to turn gay.
Report Post »jesusismygunner
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:50pmActually, homosexual relations do occur in nature. So much of what we do is unnatural and you should really think about taking such an argument when posting to an online magazine. Last time I checked the internet wasn’t mentioned in the Bible.
Report Post »johnjamison
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 3:30pmTrev,
Report Post »Aquaman is the most useless superhero ever 95% of all crime takes place on land .The ability to command fish is useless. If a pet store owner gets kills he might be able to get a description of the prep from a tetra. But thats about it
trevthomp
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 8:29pmJohn,
Report Post »Clearly you aren’t reading it. Much of the story revolves around him living on land surrounded by people who say things like “Hi Aquaman, are you going to talk to fish today?” Then he gets to go out and save them from some disaster and act like a hero. If you don‘t care or don’t follow or don’t know anything other than the name, then you’re exactly the type of person to get all outraged over a minor league nobody character being gay.
Sharon Rose
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:39pmBoo to DC Comics.
Report Post »Pacapapa
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:53pmMaybe they should change their name to AC/DC Comics.
Report Post »DiscipleMaker
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:04pmNo…PC Comics
Report Post »PapaJohannesPatriot
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:38pmHand me a barf bag, please.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:38pmWell there goes the super hero neighborhood…
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:37pmMore homosexuality as normal being shoved down our throats.
Report Post »Wedge
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:00pmGlad I’m not the only one tired of the gay/lesbian aggenda being shoved down our throats, and thats exactly what is being done!
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:56pmGreat visuals, very latent imagery! LOL
Ayn Rand LOVES DC
Report Post »Bruce P.
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 5:38pmGIT-R-DONE — it is not being shoved down your throat. If you don’t like it, don’t read the comics. No one is forcing you to.
Of course, what he means by “shoved down our throats” is “permitted”. He is upset he cannot force such things out of existence through laws and violence.
Report Post »moreteaplease
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:35pmThis is some seriously sickening crap!
Report Post »johnjamison
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:43pmHow fitting the comic franchise named D.C. would push homosexuality.This move is just another nail in the coffin of another magazine franchise that has been dead for over a decade.
Report Post »They should change their name to P.C. comics.
kleindropper
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:31pmWell superheroes generally dress like they are gay, so I guess it makes sense. Does this mean that Obsidian will never exist in this universe (since gays can’t have children?)
Report Post »Baikonur
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:35pmGay people are not anatomically unable to have children. :)
Fool.
Report Post »GodHatesFigs
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:37pmMy gay father-in-law would disagree that he couldn’t have children.
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:42pmYes, they are writing Obsidian out of existence just to compete with Marvel’s agenda. I’m not sure about Jade or what happens with her. I thought the whole “let’s reboot the whole DC universe” thing was stupid and I have bought less than I did before. Now that they feel they have to push Obama’s gay agenda, I will buy even less of DC and Marvel. Dynamite is an up and coming company with the Lone Ranger, Green Hornet, Warlord of Mars, and other legends. Even Hellboy died.
Report Post »EqualJustice
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:46pmHe didn’t HAVE kids with his gay lover, though and you can’t CHANGE that fact, no matter HOW you try to spin it. NATURE won’t allow it, sorry.
Report Post »mr.goodvibe
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:05pmWell it might be possible if he grows some ovaries in his anus.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:43pmactually BAIKIE….yes they are automatically unable to have children because without a third party they cannot procreate. Is this lost on you sport? If you‘re trying to infer that they’re not infertile that’s a given. But being strict homosexuals, they cannot procreate with the help of a third party. Making them a dead end for the species.
Report Post »Baikonur
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 3:08pm@AvengerK
Report Post »Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:43pm
‘actually BAIKIE….yes they are automatically unable to have children because without a third party they cannot procreate. ‘
**************
Avengerk, many gay people in the US are currently in heterosexual relationships and procreating.
AvengerK
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 3:44pmBAIKIE…perhaps you‘re just too stupid to understand what’s been presented to you.
A STRICT homosexual cannot procreate without a third party’s assistance. Citing closeted homosexuals to me that remain in heterosexual relationships does not change the fact that two homosexuals as a couple cannot procreate without a third party being involved.
In fact you’ve reiterated my point. The closeted homosexual needs another party to procreate with because he or she cannot procreate while in a homosexual relationship. So indeed homosexuals are a dead end.
Report Post »Thank you for reiterating the same even though you didn’t mean to.
EqualJustice
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:30pmHAHAHA Why not, since NO ONE reads comics any longer? Another WTF moment.
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:48pmYou’re wrong, there a lot of people still reading and collecting comics, including me. I have been at it for 35 years.
Report Post »Meyvn
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:56pm@Anonymous T. Irrelevant: Just gay nerds with spines of a fish do.
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:29pm@MEYVN
Report Post »KMA Troll
Bruce P.
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 5:37pmEQUALJUSTICE — comics are experiencing a new Golden Age.
Report Post »FEMALL
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:29pmThank heavens it’s not SGT Rock.
Report Post »netmail
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:40pmHe’s next. The Sgt will be scheduled for some cosmetic surgery soon and his likeness will be in the image of Rock Hudson.
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:43pmHeh, please don’t give them ideas.
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 1:44pmYou got that right! Or Jeb Stewart and the Haunted Tank.
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:27pmMy dad and all my uncles were WWII Vets, and I loved reading about the lost battalion and the haunted compact tank. But it was the can-do message that really “indoctrinated” our generation.
Referring back to Joe Kubert’s classic 1960’s Sergeant Rock DC comics, Easy Company has a character that represents every political and social background. United we stand!
Nowadays, well, not so much! LOL
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 2:42pm@MONICNE
Report Post »Wasn’t Star Trek set up the same way? White Kirk, Asian Sulu, Black Uhura, Russian Checkov, Scottie, etc.
AvengerK
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 3:10pm“Every political and social background” MONICNE/ENCINOM/SLEAZY HIPPO? Racially Easy Company was written as diverse..please demonstrate where it had “every poltical and social background”.
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 3:18pmAT-Irrelevant, You are Right On Absolutely!
That was a model for the power of Empirical military success – by using the best features, talents, and characteristics of the entire heroic, talented and individual Volunteer team.
This is also the theme of the modern US military. It’s the mission, not the Icon!
It’s sweet you collect after 35 years – these short-lived “gaymics” will be a great ROI in 10 or so I bet.
imagine a POW-MIA comic
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 3:34pmIt’s getting to be the weekend again, and some of us are getting cranky because soon we will not be able to post until Monday (if there is no Bank Holiday). Some of us begin to get testy and we break things. It all works out in the end.
See ya ‘round! Okey-dokey. LOL
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on June 1, 2012 at 3:45pmThat’s right MONICNE/ENCINOM/SLEAZY HIPPO..you offered BS so you ran like the cur you are. That’s the only running you actually do anyway.
Report Post »