Government

‘Defending Liberty’: Defiant Clarence Thomas Slams Critics for ‘Undermining’ High Court

Politico reports:

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas – his impartiality under attack from liberals because of his attendance at a meeting of conservative donors sponsored by the Koch brothers and his wife’s tea party activism – struck a defiant tone in a Saturday night speech in Charlottesville, Va., telling a friendly audience that he and his wife “believe in the same things” and “are focused on defending liberty.”

Delivering the keynote speech at an annual symposium for conservative law students, Thomas spoke in vague, but ominous, terms about the direction of the country and urged his listeners to “redouble your efforts to learn about our country so that you’re in a position to defend it.”

He also lashed out at his critics, without naming them, asserting they “seem bent on undermining” the High Court as an institution. Such criticism, Thomas warned, could erode the ability of American citizens to fend off threats to their way of life.

“You all are going to be, unfortunately, the recipients of the fallout from that – that there’s going to be a day when you need these institutions to be credible and to be fully functioning to protect your liberties,” he said, according to a partial recording of the speech provided to POLITICO by someone who was at the meeting.

Read the rest of the Politico report here.

Comments (203)

  • eyestoseeearstohear
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 6:05pm

    In case after case disputing the validty of Barack Obama’s contitutional right to hold office due to the question of his citizenship the courts have found some minor or technical excuse to claim lack of standing. Recently one more distinguished veteran of the armed services was not allowed discovery in his attempt to prove that his commander in chief was unfit for that role, and as a result Colonel Terry Lakin will face a court martial. Why? Because the judge at the trial stated that any embarrassment to the President should not be made public under the jurisdiction of her military court.

    A district court judge in Santa Anna California, a former Marine, who was determined to hold trial on the question of Obama’s eligibility despite desperate arguments by two US attorneys who were turned away by the court failed to follow through. Why? Intimidation? Corruption? Both probably. That happened in the beginning of this year.

    Once again a competent and knowledgeable attorney representing his clients will face the Supreme Court justices, who have continued to cowardly deny each case questioning the constitutional eligibility of our president to be objectively considered and legally determined. It is interesting to note that our court system, particularly the Supreme Court, was designed to be politically immuned to the influences of Congress and the office of the presidency. The job of the Supreme Court was to interpret law according to the Constitution of the United States of America, unhindered by the designs of political parties that would use law to create inequalities in policy and to uphold knowingly the unlawful appointment of leaders unfit to hold office such as Barack Hussein Obama.

    All along the failure of Obama to meet requirements specifically set by Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution requiring the highest ranking officer of the executive branch to be a natrual born citizen within the United States, has been in question.

    Obama refuses to release important personal documents, such as the long form birth certificate, his elementary school records that supposedly exist in Hawaii, academic records in at least 2 universities where it seems no one remembers that he attended, as well as the Illinois BAR association documents that prove that he legally practiced law. There are more. Obama has spent from 1.6 to 2 million dollars in order to keep these papers from being made public or allowing discovery of them at all. These are the facts. His supporters refuse to acknowledge that these facts are worthy of further dispute or challenge in the court system and are merely relegated to the “Birther” category lambasted by our liberal press who practically elected Obama themselves.

    Mario Appuzo, the lawyer who is arguing the Kerchner vs Obama case will ultilize a different strategy that has yet to be addressed by the court, the Vattel Theory. This argument would allow discovery based on the acceptance of standing and allow a writ of certiorary which if granted would begin a federal trial in a New Jersey court to hear the case. A final definition on the term “natural born citizen” would have a timely impact in view of the current immigration crisis.

    Appuzo believes he has a solid case based on standing as well as the determination of legal citizenship. The Vattel theory of requiring a president to be legally born within the US along with both parents being legal US citizens was adopted by our forefathers to insure that American values and patriotism would be impressed upon the president from childhood.

    According to Mario, if the court allowed discovery it would be the end of Obama’s presidency as the fraud would finally be uncovered. It is a known fact that his father was a British subject. There is evidence that Obama himself was born in Kenya as was testified by his grandmother and a government official. His step father made him a citizen of Indonesia.
    Obama has used numerous social security numbers constituting legal identity fraud. Yet, the courts are unwilling to hear or prosecute based on well documented challenges.

    “If the courts had guts enough and would deal with this and would allow discovery, then Obama would be out of office,” stated Phillip Berg, a previous attorney who was denied standing. “You don‘t spend that kind of money unless there’s something to hide, and I believe that he’s hiding this because he was not born in the US.” Berg continued.

    “The Supreme Court has never decided to hear the merits of an eligibility case, ” Phillip explained. “If the Supreme Court would decide to hear a case then Obama would be out of office. If Congress were to decide to hear a case then Obama would be out of office.”

    If we are a nation of laws and not a nation of men, then why do our courts refuse to hear a perfectly valid legal argument pertaining to the eligibility of the president of the United States of America? Why is every attempt to exercise the right of citizens and combatants who serve under the commander in chief being denied standing when armed with facts that point to not only fraud, but a conspiracy to elect a noncitizen to the office of the presidency, a noncitizen who has knowingly committed fraud in order to be elected? Is this not a conspiracy that reaches to the very highest echelons of our government’s authority? Was the president of the US more than just an illegally vetted noncitizen? Is he a Manchurian candidate?

    How is it that when you and I, just common everyday citizens, are required to present our birth certificate and proof of our education, that we willingly comply, yet our president does not have to? Tell me there’s not something seriously wrong with this question.

    .

    Continue reading on Examiner.com: Supreme Court To Consider New Eligibility Case on Obama – Dallas TEA Party | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/tea-party-in-dallas/supreme-court-to-consider-new-eligibility-case-on-obama#ixzz1FDN9fvJG

    Report Post »  
    • ladyda
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 6:50pm

      How I wish someone would break through all the P.C. and corruption and put and end to this Presidency, for I truly do not feel that we can withstand all the damage that his administration is forcing on us, and when he fully pulls off his sheeps clothing what horror’s may be forthcoming, for I fear this man has a score he is trying to settle and there is much that he has already done that we have no present knowledge of. We will all suffer because of this.

      Report Post » ladyda  
    • APEXIdaho
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 6:58pm

      This link is to an article that backs up every thing you just said.

      http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=134881

      Report Post »  
    • Bob1943
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 11:59pm

      You are absolutely correct. If we let this presidency stand we have been defeated by Alinsky tactics….and America is effectively over.

      Report Post »  
  • YouGottaProblemWithThat
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 6:02pm

    Pray for health and longevity for this great American Justice. Justice Thomas, you are a role model for American boys and girls and I pray to The Holy One of Isreal that you will live a long life. Thank you for your service to our country.

    Our constitution is worth fighting for people!

    Report Post » YouGottaProblemWithThat  
  • ladyda
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 6:01pm

    Get rid of all Czars and if the Supreme Justices are found to be writing their own laws and not following the Constitution, provide a way to fire them. Justice Thomas is a good man, that he is a successful and intelligent black man, as well as a conservative really ****** off the left. All people should be bothered by this. Like I have said a thousand times, if you are a person of color, the left does NOT want you to be a thinking human being. They need to keep you down, dependant and SHEEP. Don’t fall for it.

    Report Post » ladyda  
  • sleazyhippo
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 6:00pm

    Add your comments

    Report Post » MONICNE  
  • curtmavi38
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:59pm

    Supreme court justices should not get into the fray, Sticks and stones may break my bones but words can never harm me. It will cause more problems than it is worth. HE should tell his wife to cool it.meh

    Report Post »  
    • Ron_WA
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 6:42pm

      Amen on Supreme Court Justices not getting into the fray – it is highly problematic & detracts from the good work of the SCOTUS. But when it comes to his wife’s activities – as long as she’s not involved in crime, he should quietly love & support her as he has always done.

      Report Post » Ron_WA  
    • BRAVEHEART
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 11:12pm

      The only thing necessay for evil to win is for good men to do nothing.

      Report Post »  
  • notreally
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:58pm

    God bless him. May his numbers multiply.

    Report Post »  
  • simple thought
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:57pm

    these justices are the last wall of defense that will protect the constitution…
    why the democrats liberal progressive people would attempt to destroy them is insane…..
    what was it the sen. shumur said, the three branches are the congress, the senate and the president..
    the president dose not replace the justice system, even if shumur and the liberals wish it so……

    Report Post »  
  • Carol in MA
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:57pm

    God Bless Ginni & Chief Justice Thomas….I’ve been a member of Liberty Central since day 1….Ginni is doing GREAT work keeping us informed with her website!!! We love her!!!

    Report Post » Carol in MA  
  • cnsrvtvj
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:57pm

    I heard something about that too. That would be opening a real can of worms if they do.

    Report Post » cnsrvtvj  
    • idrathermisstotheright
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 8:31pm

      The court screwed up by not responding appropriately there for the party seeking is requesting that the two liberal BO appointees not be present due to conflict of interest.

      Report Post » idrathermisstotheright  
  • kickagrandma
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:56pm

    JESUS GOD, we are in a mess of trouble down here, all of our own making, LORD. We’ve committed more sins of omission than commission, I guess; but, nonetheless, here we are. LORD, if ever in the history of mankind there were YOUR children standing in the need of prayer and forgiveness, it is us. We ask YOUR forgiveness for not paying attention to the eroding of our CHRISTIAN nation. We ask YOU to forgive our silence when we should have spoken. And, LORD, most of all, we ask YOUR forgiveness for our smug, self-satisfied lives. When we broke out of our sameness and stepped into YOUR light and YOUR way, GOD, we did shine. We thank YOU for those times, too, LORD, and we ask YOU please for the opportunity to stand again~~~ a GODly country, filled with humble, kind and generous people as we once were. If we cannot be that way again, here for YOU and because of YOU, then GOD, we do not deserve our country restored to us. If we cannot keep her safe and free from enemies without and within, we are absolutely undeserving of the blessing and responsibility of having AMERICA back in our hands.

    LORD, how I pray for our nation, for its people, and most especially for YOUR “kids” here in harm’s way because we are at last standing up, standing tall and standing free. Give us YOUR courage, LORD. Grant us YOUR peace, YOUR presence and YOUR protection. Please protect the CHRISTIAN leaders that we do have in office, few that they are, but strong in their dependence on YOU. We ask YOUR presence around JUDGE CLARENCE THOMAS and others, around their families, too, LORD. We give YOU thanks in all things. In JESUS’ PRECIOUS NAME, AMEN!

    Report Post »  
    • TumbleBumble
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 6:07pm

      Amen.

      Report Post » TumbleBumble  
    • MirandaH
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 6:18pm

      Amen and Thank You. We are in trouble here. My parents grew up in the depression, and lived through hard times. I am sorry they have passed away, but It would kill them to see what has happened to this nation.

      Report Post »  
    • ChiefGeorge
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 7:01pm

      Was that long after he’s gone or early after he is gone? We may not get that far. This judge may still be on the bench when liberty comes under direct threat from those currently running this country into the ground. God Bless him. Young people today believe they are actually striving for more liberty but the exact opposite is happening. They are building prisons for themselves and us.

      Report Post » ChiefGeorge  
    • ChiefGeorge
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 7:03pm

      Thank you for that prayer on so many other peoples behalf who would curse you to your face for saying it. But they know not what they do…some, others maybe not so much.

      Report Post » ChiefGeorge  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 10:24pm

      @kickagrandma

      Amen, and May God Have Mercy!

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
    • exdem
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 10:26pm

      Amen
      You made me tear up.

      Report Post »  
    • aladytoo
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 10:39pm

      Amen and thank you. What a beautiful and meaningful prayer!

      Report Post » aladytoo  
  • Airgun
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:53pm

    God bless you sir, and watch over you and your family.
    I extend this as well to the other members of your court; I pray for your safety.
    You are right, we will need you.

    Report Post » Airgun  
    • Bluebonnet
      Posted on February 28, 2011 at 10:32am

      Thank you. We need to pray daily for God to help us during these terrible times, like most of us have never known. Prayer is the only thing that can save us from these frightening times.

      Report Post »  
  • eyestoseeearstohear
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:51pm

    Mr. Thomas KNOWS about Obama’s “ illegal” status….and they are giving him hell.
    The “ Obama Trials” on this matter – is being FOUGHT tooth and nail, to prevent this trial from occurring.

    MR. & MRS. THOMAS….
    PLEASE STAND FIRM & STRONG AND HELP TO RESOLVE THIS AWFUL THING THAT HAS HAPPENED TO AMERICA.

    Report Post »  
  • sleazyhippo
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:50pm

    Apparently the SCOTUS is being attacked with criticism for the members becoming involved in politics that provide conflict of interest with certain cases. All Justice Thomas has to do is take himself away from any cases that benefit himself or his wife. This is a minimum requirement for every lower court justice.

    Report Post » MONICNE  
    • 13th Imam
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 6:06pm

      Fail

      Report Post » 13th Imam  
    • cheezwhiz
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 6:24pm

      All Justice Thomas has to do is take himself away from any cases that benefit himself or his wife. This is a minimum requirement for every lower court justice.
      ————–
      Is that you Tiny Weiner ?
      Pre-empting objections to Kagan, on the fed-med-dead bill ?
      From link :
      http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2011/02/before-rep-weiner-lectures-judge-thomas.html
      Kagan was solicitor general for the Obama Administration during the time the bill was being passed although she has claimed that she had no substantial legal involvement with the bill (of course she is the one defining substantial).
      Nice try.
      Now go ogle at some statues !!

      Report Post » cheezwhiz  
    • sleazyhippo
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 7:33pm

      Mam, excuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuze me!

      Report Post » MONICNE  
    • sleazyhippo
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 7:37pm

      Gee Whiz, you are on the wrong site – this is a discussion about SCOTUS patriots not teenie weiners. (smile)

      Report Post » MONICNE  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 10:15pm

      Apparently the SCOTUS is being attacked with criticism for the members becoming involved in politics that provide conflict of interest with certain cases. All Justice Thomas has to do is take himself away from any cases that benefit himself or his wife. This is a minimum requirement for every lower court justice
      **************
      When, may I ask, is there NOT criticism of ANYTHING a CONSERVATIVE DOES? To believe in a strict interpretation of the constitution, and not that it is A LIVING BREATHING DOCUMENT,subject to changing interpretation depending on societal norms, Was Heralded as being TOooooooo Political when Bush nominated ANY justices! So if this is political, isn’t anything which affects our rule of law, or a CONSTITUTIONAL interpretation of any law, not something they’ll say will benefit Justice Thomas, OR his Tea Party Involved Wife?

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
    • sleazyhippo
      Posted on February 28, 2011 at 2:42pm

      Mil Mom, I never thought about it that way before! Thank You! It is so unfair that public persons and oath takers have to do things ethically, and are kept from profiting from the trust we give them. Maybe it is time we relaxed our rules for just thye good ones – so they can gather some well deserved wealth. Thanks!

      Report Post » MONICNE  
  • Jackie Rogers, Jr.
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:50pm

    If there is any public institution where political ideology should be ignored it is the Supreme Court.
    Only the arguments of the meaning of the Constitution should be considered. In other words, Intellect.

    Report Post » Jackie Rogers, Jr.  
  • TumbleBumble
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:48pm

    “urged his listeners to “redouble your efforts to learn about our country so that you’re in a position to defend it.””

    Glenn’s in good company.

    Report Post » TumbleBumble  
    • Lucy Larue
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 8:17pm

      Tumble Bumble,

      Yes…,Glenn is in STELLAR company with the likes of Justice Thomas.
      There are so many good posts here, said better than I could say. Thanks for ALL of them.
      I am glad clarence Thmas sits on our Supreme court at this time in our nation’s history.

      Report Post »  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 10:05pm

      I am glad clarence Thmas sits on our Supreme court at this time in our nation’s history.
      ************
      For anyone old enough to remember the battle that Justice Thomas went through for this position, the sheer fact he remained steadfast and permitted God to fight his battle is an inspiration. Considering the battle we have always from the left “The President has a right to his picks” when it’s their POTUS, and “He’s stacking the courts”, when it’s not; we truly need to put forth that much more effort in the upcoming Primaries, and then during the campaign. THE SENATE MUST NOT GO TO SQUISHY MODERATES, BUT IT MUST CERTAINLY BE WON BACK FROM THE PROGRESSIVES (( LEST THEY “ PROGRESS ” US RIGHT PAST BEING A CONSTITUTIONAL ‘DEMOCRATIC’ REPUBLIC !!!))

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
  • hogtrashhd
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:48pm

    these agitators like obama are the minority.. but very vicious… we need to stay vigilant and oust the enemy within.. I have faith in our countrymen.. the majority are hip to the crap going on.. we are still the silent majority but the dragon is wide awake…. and we will sleep with one eye open forever.. teach your children and grandchildren well..

    Report Post »  
  • RLTW
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:48pm

    We continue to see in many places across the country one man doing the right thing can make a difference, thanks CT keep up the good work and know We the people have your back.

    Report Post »  
  • Showtime
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:48pm

    I read somewhere — in a Google alert, I think — that the Supreme Court is going to have “another look” at the eligibility issue.

    Report Post » Showtime  
  • Spawnomite
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:48pm

    Clarence Thomas is just racist. . uh. . oh. .he’s black. . crap!! How are we going to spin this?

    Report Post »  
  • emertz8413
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:47pm

    May God protect this man and the other conservative Justices!

    Report Post »  
    • dimbulbz
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 7:52pm

      Egad, Can you imagine if something were to happen to any conservative on SCOTUS right now? It would be all over, based on our POTUS’s taste for all things left wing, controlling and radical, and our Senators love of all things squishy and “negotiable”.

      Report Post » dimbulbz  
    • NancyBee
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 9:11pm

      And guard and protect them

      Report Post » NancyBee  
  • REVerse
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:44pm

    You are a great man, Justice Thomas. Thank you for being steadfast. It does not go unnoticed.

    Report Post » REVerse  
  • Thunderstorm 316
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:40pm

    Thomas you are awsome, and you have my support. And Obama care will erode the High Court or any Court for that matter. When a federal jude rules it uncostitutional and Obama and freinds still continue to implament it anyway, it erodes our courts.

    Report Post »  
    • Oldphoto678
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 8:55pm

      You do know that the courts have ruled it constitutional agian, right? You do know that don’t you?

      Report Post »  
  • flagbearer
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:40pm

    God protect and be with Justice Thomas! I am amazed that so many Americans do not “get” what is happening to our country…just ignorance, or what?

    Report Post »  
    • Dale
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:45pm

      apathy and ignorance.

      Report Post » Dale  
    • Spawnomite
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:50pm

      Nah, they are standing by to embrace a Dictator.

      Life will be that much easier if we just let the government take care of us.

      Afterall, they know what’s best for us.. .. . .

       
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 9:55pm

      @flagbearer
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:40pm
      God protect and be with Justice Thomas! I am amazed that so many Americans do not “get” what is happening to our country…just ignorance, or what?

      ************
      It has to be intentionally closing their eyes, lest something be seen before them which is toooooo uncomfortable, and would demand taking a side in what they choose to deem a battle of fanatics and crazies on both sides. Do you remember a day, when all you wanted was a chance to live your own life, and leave the weightier matters to those you believed were meant to handle them?
      For me that time was somewhere between highschool, and reading my first-grader’s “Weekly Reader” newspaper, and realizing it was just a front for political indoctrination. (Mostly for positions I did not want my children raised to hold.

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
  • Keep the Faith
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:37pm

    God Bless Clarence Thomas

    Report Post » Keep the Faith  
    • AKMIIKEUS
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:44pm

      God Help us from Clarence Thomas.

      AKMIIKEUS  
    • DUMBASPELOSI
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 10:01pm

      God have mercy on his people in America.
      Times are going to get very tough.

      Report Post » DUMBASPELOSI  
    • TheBMT
      Posted on February 28, 2011 at 12:20am

      Yea… AKMIIKEUS, I def don’t want Liberty. Just put the shackles on me right now.

      Report Post »  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on February 28, 2011 at 12:55am

      AKMIIKEUS help us from commies like you

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • IAMMADDOG
      Posted on February 28, 2011 at 8:42am

      There is no help for you AKMIIKEUS, or your kind!

      Report Post »  
    • hologram5
      Posted on February 28, 2011 at 10:04am

      @AKMIIKEUS
      God help us from brain dead fools like YOU!

      Report Post » hologram5  
  • LibertyUSA1
    Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:32pm

    God Love and Protect this stellar American. Live Free or Die!

    Report Post »  
    • LAM2
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:52pm

      I have immense respect for Clarence Thomas. I highly recommend his autobiography My Grandfather’s Son and am amazed and humbled by how hard he worked, both physically and academically, from a young age into manhood, unlike a large percentage of American kids today who have never experienced a hard day’s labor. God bless Justice Thomas and his family, and God help those who perpetuate evil against them.

      Report Post »  
    • sleazyhippo
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:53pm

      Here comes the Defense of Marriage Act case….

      MONICNE  
    • cheezwhiz
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:53pm

      The same SCOTUS which now has Kagan who actually represented the Saudis after 9/11 ?
      The same SCOTUS which now has Sotomayor who actually worked for the PRLDF to get pardon for terrorists ?
      And Justice Thomas is the problem, why ? because Hussain has targetted him for revenge since day one ( remember his 60 min interview where he bad mouthed both Thomas and Scalia )

      Report Post » cheezwhiz  
    • sleazyhippo
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 5:59pm

      These unnamed critics are trying to keep this gentleman from enjoying the same ability to speak publicly, write books, and become sponsored by networks as a paid contributor that other political personalities have. It’s not an even playing field since SCOTUS are appointed for life, and they have to maintain an impartial veneer. So by the time he retires, Clarence will have lost millions of potential dollars, which he will never get to re-claim

      Report Post » MONICNE  
    • watchtheotherhand
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 6:03pm

      SCJ Thomas is a highly intelligent, self-made, classy man who is a walking testimony to the foundations of this country and what levels a common ordinary person can ascend to when they apply themselves. He is an absolute threat to everything liberals stand for just as is Allen West. Keep up your most important duties Judge Thomas as you defend the Constitution of the U.S. from those who want to usurp it‘s authority in our form of government and twist it to the point it is unrecognizable from it’s original form and intent !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Report Post » SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING  
    • cheezwhiz
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 6:04pm

      Forgot linky
      http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=152949
      http://www.judicialwatch.org/news/2009/jun/judicial-watch-releases-special-report-judge-sotomayors-connection-puerto-rican-legal-

      Report Post » cheezwhiz  
    • 13th Imam
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 6:04pm

      Toby
      Thank you for your post. Have seen him on and he’s a straight shooter(oops my bad) To Justice Thomas , you kick butt, Thanks

      Report Post » 13th Imam  
    • sleazyhippo
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 6:12pm

      Remember – SC Justice Thomas has paid his dues – he came up HARD, and he deserves a Pay Day!
      Also Clarence Thomas always does his own research, just like GB teaches us – He is a self made man.

      Report Post » MONICNE  
    • GONESURFING
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 6:12pm

      Yes, may God bless Clarence Thomas, a great Supreme Court judge.

      Report Post » GONESURFING  
    • watchtheotherhand
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 6:27pm

      SCJ Thomas is the man and blows wholes in liberals with the greatest of ease. All they can do is attack him personally because they know he’ll tear them up historically and legally. I hope his capitalistic views and entrepreneurship earn him millions upon millions !!!!!!!!!!

      Report Post » SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING  
    • Uncle Crusty
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 6:34pm

      FREEEEEEEEEEdom! This man speaks words of iron, and defend our Constitution I WILL!!!!

      Report Post »  
    • freeus
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 6:40pm

      Justice Thomas is an inspirational hero.

      Report Post »  
    • cnsrvtvj
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 7:03pm

      @LibertyUSA1 – I couldn’t agree more. This guy has been through enough from the loons on the left already.

      http://www.donsmithshow.com – see the Selective Outrage video

      Report Post » cnsrvtvj  
    • watchtheotherhand
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 7:25pm

      May SCJ Thomas become rich from his labors and be made not to share with the lazy hippos of the world !!!!!!!!!!

      Report Post » SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING  
    • sleazyhippo
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 7:25pm

      I can’t imagine what would happen if SCJ Thomas were to retire and the current administration were to appoint a NEW SC Justice! So I think we should let Thomas (and Scalia and Alito) Cash In Already (CIA)! It’s not fair that ex-Governors and Ex-Speakers and Ex-Congress-persons can rake in Millions when our SCOTUS has to just take it and take it as we Push These Cases – Down Their Throats (PTC-DTT)!

      MONICNE  
    • sleazyhippo
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 7:31pm

      Also never forget that its not just Clarence – he has a wife who yearns to be free of the shackles of the SCOTUS, who deserves to profit by leading grass roots patriots and who is good a blowing wholes herself.

      Report Post » MONICNE  
    • cheezwhiz
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 7:37pm

      sleazyhippo
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 7:25pm
      I can’t imagine what would happen if SCJ Thomas were to retire and the current administration were to appoint a NEW SC Justice!
      ——————–
      Is that a threat you just made ?

      Report Post » cheezwhiz  
    • exdem
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 7:38pm

      He is so hated because he is a conservative and black. Drives the ******** CRAZY!!
      And to his wife Ginny , I would like to apologize on behalf of Anita Hill. Hill is a liar and should be ashamed of herself. But Progressives have no conscience.

      Report Post »  
    • My Sacred Honor
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 8:06pm

      It is shocking to me that the Judiciary has lost so much respect and power according to the Constitution, that there are so many “activist” Judges on the Federal level and they let politics interfere with their decisions. I understand that it is hard to take personal opinion out of your decision-making process, but there are so few of them, how hard is it to find suitable canidates whose integrity is beyond reproach and are Honorable?
      This man, Judge Thomas is one of the few.
      I LOVE me some “Judge Thomas”!

      Semper Fi and is Nov. 2012 here yet?

      Report Post » My Sacred Honor  
    • sleazyhippo
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 8:12pm

      Whiz – Whatchu Talkin ‘Bout? \eh?
      Dear miss cheese; “Making a Threat” means there is something I apparently missed. Is there something you read into my statement – I was being clear (to most readers) and somehow failed to reach you, so please list (in specific detail) what you mean. Have a blessed evening (grin).

      Report Post » MONICNE  
    • watchtheotherhand
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 8:27pm

      I sure hope SCJ Thomas and his wife make millions upon millions from speaking events and books and analyst gigs. If he’s lucky he might just be able to go hippo hunting in Africa. The hippopotamus is recognizable by its barrel-shaped torso, enormous mouth and teeth, nearly hairless body, stubby legs and tremendous size.

      Report Post » SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING  
    • watchtheotherhand
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 9:08pm

      Speaking of defending liberty……………..

      Last week President Obama had a closed-door meeting with a dozen barons of the modern tech age. Among those he attempted to wine and dine guests were Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Google CEO Erick Schmidt, and Apple founder and CEO Steve Jobs. He also plied them with pro-businesses mantras, though he practices policies that hurt them.
      While the press was not allowed to cover the event, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney released an e-mail about the dinner. Apparently Obama chose these 12 titans of technology because “American companies like these have been leading by investing in the creativity and ingenuity of the American people, creating cutting-edge new technologies and promoting new ways to communicate.”

      Indeed: If anyone knows how to lead the country by pushing it to nearly-boundless creative and communicative abilities technologically, these guests – who also included Dick Costolo, CEO of Twitter, and Larry Ellison, CEO of Oracle — might know a thing or two about it. According to Carney, during the two and a half hour meal, the president discussed “his proposals to invest in research and development and expand incentives for companies to grow and hire, along with his goal of doubling exports over five years to support millions of American jobs.”

      Gee I wonder if they talked about net neutrality at all. I wonder if they talked about controlling and manipulating the content and access to the internet since the world just got a taste at how this new technology of communication can play a vital role in revolutionary events ?????????????? Something smells very fishy….like secret meetings with mobster union types !!!!!!!!!!!

      Report Post » SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING  
    • retriever
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 9:14pm

      A Real American! They couldn’t beat him with all their power!

      Report Post »  
    • joan k
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 9:17pm

      Amen!

      Report Post » joan k  
    • independentvoteril
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 9:42pm

      this is one GREAT AMERICAN

      Report Post » independentvoteril  
    • DisillusionedDaily
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 10:12pm

      It is a shame that the entire SCOTUS is not as dedicated to upholding the Constitution as this man is. I pray that Obama has no opportunity to make another appointment to the bench.

      Report Post » DisillusionedDaily  
    • encinom
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 10:16pm

      The only problem is the Justice is under mining the court. The actions of him and his tea-bagging wife call into question his ability to be unbias. His wife an active member is the fight against sick americans, calls into question the Justices ability to rule fairly.

      Report Post »  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on February 27, 2011 at 11:21pm

      AKMIIKEUS You are a jerk

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • banjarmon
      Posted on February 28, 2011 at 12:47am

      @akmiikeus…are you broker0101…at least his twin?

      Report Post » banjarmon  
    • realindependent
      Posted on February 28, 2011 at 5:01am

      Judge clarence thomas has never asked a single question in any of the Supreme Courts Hearings or arguements. Doesnt that seem a bit odd? Make histroric decisions without asking a single question? And goes to right wing Koch brother events and gets paid to speak. His wife is a Tea party based Fundraising lobyists. He should step down. PERIOD

      Report Post » realindependent  
    • UPSETVET
      Posted on February 28, 2011 at 6:18am

      Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has been attacked by the liberal left on several occasions because of his determination to protect and defend the US Constitution. Recent events warrant such a stand that Justice Thomas has taken and the US Congress and Senate should also take the same stand. The US Consttitution has been under attack from the beginning of this current administration.

      The US Constitution does NOT give the Executive Branch of the US Government the authority or power to circumvent the Judicial and Legislative Branches. It was for times like these that the founders of our country established the three distinct branches of government to prevent one branch from giving itself the authority and power not given to it by the US Constitution.

      President Obama recently declared that he has ordered the US Attorney General, Eric Holder, to no longer defend the DOMA LAW ( Defense Of Marriage Act). Holder has commented that HE considers the LAW unconstitutional and threfore will NOT defend it. WAIT A MINUTE. Since when does the President and the Attorney General of the USA have the authority and power to establish law and determine what is and what is not contitutional.

      President Obama during his inaugural ceremony took a sworn oath during which he as the POTUS would protect and defend the Constitution. He has BROKEN that oath. Therefore the US Congress and Senate should begin the procedure to impeach President Barack Obama. The impeachment process against Presidents Nixon and Clinton was put into action for lesser offences. Why is President Barack Obama being given a “free pass” for his uncontitutional act ?

      Constitutionally, neither the President or the Attorney General have the liberty or right to decide which laws they wiil defend or not defend. If they get away with it this time, what law will they decide is unconstitutional and therefore will not be defend? The US Constitution requires them to defend ALL
      laws. Are American citizens going to just stand by and submit to being governed by a one man system of government. That, my friends, is rule by a DICTATORSHIP or a MONARCHY. Personally I will not submit to a DICTATOR or KING ! I proudly stand beside Patrick Henry and shout, “Give me liberty or give me death”. God Bless America !

      Report Post »  
    • Uncle Sambo
      Posted on February 28, 2011 at 6:33am

      It is so refreshing to hear the words of a true heir to Dr. King.

      Report Post »  
    • sbleve
      Posted on February 28, 2011 at 7:26am

      An American, he is. At least my Uncle Thomas has the understanding of the differential purpose in Constitutional Law vs Case law. He and I are related, by – shirt tail in our common family The Constitution.

      Report Post » sbleve  
    • grandmaof5
      Posted on February 28, 2011 at 7:59am

      LAM2, that was an awesome book, I’m glad you mentioned it. Clarence Thomas ought to be held in the highest regard for his love of country and its Constitution. Thank God for the justices that stand strong!

      Report Post »  
    • weeblewacker1
      Posted on February 28, 2011 at 9:32am

      oh,so now he shows that he is capable of speech! 5, count them, 5 years on the bench and NOT ONE single question.must be his wife wrote something out for him and made him say it! this dude must be one of the most incompetent members of the S.C. ever!! can’t even fill -out a simple form that asks about his wife’s income? He needs to be removed a.s.a.p. and replaced.even if it is by another rethug.

      Report Post »  
    • Miguelito
      Posted on February 28, 2011 at 12:02pm

      God’s speed Judge!

      Report Post »  
    • happyboy
      Posted on February 28, 2011 at 1:17pm

      Ginsberg attends ACLU gatherings. She was president of ACLU yet refuses to recuse herself in ACLU cases that go before the court. Bryer received awards from anti-American organizations in Europe.

      Report Post »  
    • technoid
      Posted on March 1, 2011 at 6:23pm

      Amen to that!

      Report Post »  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In