Politics

Democratic National Convention Bans Babies and Now the Feminists Are Upset

It’s a recurring gag that Presidents have to do a lot of kissing babies. If so, President Obama must be really sick of that particular ritual.

Why? Because the Democratic National Convention has just banned children from the convention floor — including breastfeeding babies — unless those children have convention credentials. Which, needless to say, is relatively unlikely.

It is not clear what motivated this particular policy. However, in a development that may surprise some people, the move has infuriated the party’s feminist luminaries. Feminist icon Gloria Steinem issued a statement to the Charlotte Observer slamming the policy:

“Women are the key to a Democratic victory, and sometimes, children are the key to women,” Steinem said in a statement. “It’s both right and smart for the Democratic Convention to behave as if children exist.”

The National Organization for Women has also lept on the bandwagon, slamming the DNC’s no-child-policy as sexist because it amounts to an “insurmountable barrier for mothers.” Given that the convention has also refused to provide child care in any way (though private child care vendors will be listed on a convention directory), this arguably isn’t much of an exaggeration. The RNC has taken a more mild tack, and only banned strollers from the convention floor.

Naturally enough, the convention’s spokespeople have denied that anything untoward is taking place. Spokeswoman Joanne Peters told the Charlotte Observer that this practice is in keeping with historical precedent – which is to say, the DNC has always required only those with credentials to access the convention floor, babies or otherwise.

Certainly, more than a few feminists can be expected to object to this line of defense. “This is the way it has always been done” is not typically a successful talking point to use when dealing with members of the feminist movement.

(H/T: David Madiera Show)

Comments (139)

  • Henry22
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 12:02pm

    Well…………..the Democrats have no problem killing the unborn baby in the late term…………..I think they have a “war on babies” going …………….

    Report Post » Henry22  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 12:30pm

      Major problem! If the children have 2 Moms, OR 2 Dads….How would they determine WHO STAYS WITH THE KIDS? IT CAN’T EVEN BE A “Sexist” PROBLEM HERE!

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
    • momrules
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 12:43pm

      The DNC does not want babies or Cardinal Dolan at their convention but look who is an invited guest. Guess what, he is an America hating Muslim.

      http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2012/08/obama-refused-cardinals-prayers-at-dnc-but-lists-muslim-jumah-prayers-as-official-function.html

      Report Post »  
    • momrules
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 12:56pm

      I have been trying to post a link from Atlasshrugs.com regarding the DNC not wanting Cardinal Dolan there but they are inviting Imam Siraj Wahhaj who has urged the overthrow of the *filthy* U.S. government and was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the WTC bombing. This Muslim will be the Grand Imam and he and 20,000 other Muslims are honored guests.

      I have a feeling Satan himself would be an invited guest at this convention, probably as the keynote speaker.

      Report Post »  
    • i2luvmyusa
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 1:08pm

      Come On all, whimpering crying Obama can not have competition of another crying baby!

      Report Post »  
    • tuppenceworth
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 1:43pm

      @MOMRULES,
      That speech by Satan himself has already been written. See “Screwtape Proposes A Toast” by C.S. Lewis, it would fit the bill and finish removing the mask!

      Does this mean Chris Matthews is banned? Just hoping after reading today’s leads. Funny how rules get murky with liberals, which “label” trumps which?

      “Children banned …unless those children have convention credentials. Which, needless to say, is relatively unlikely.” Not in Mr. Matthews case.

      Report Post »  
    • westtitus
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 1:44pm

      Thank God someone else see’s it (in jest)!!!! What a bunch of losers! It’s ok to be a low life as most Dems are, Charles Rangel, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barney Frank, Al Frankin, Barbara Boxer, Maxine Waters shall I list the rest or should I just list the ones that are not, would be pretty short list but if you are a Republican you are held to a higher standard and must be perfect. How can anyone even consider voting for all these losers and crooks, makes no sense to me at all. I guess if you are a low life you are a good person and if you have values and morals you are a bad person. This world has really changed. And remember NO BABIES allowed not even if you are pregneant, oh I forgot if you are pregnant you are not carrying a life..

      Report Post » westtitus  
    • sillyfreshness
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 2:11pm

      DNC sign: “no children allowed at any time, but mentally ill gays allowed at all times.”

      Report Post » sillyfreshness  
    • Ray2447
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 2:39pm

      Democrats have been throwing babies in dumpsters for decades so why all the upset over this latest abusive treatment of babies? It‘s not like it’s anything new. :-/

      Report Post »  
    • Ray2447
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 2:45pm

      … but, but, but, it’s part of their official identification: http://tinyurl.com/8wtaohh

      Report Post »  
    • MCDAVE
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 4:17pm

      I guess the Democrats didn’t get the message from Obama,,,They were suppose to have Abortions not Babies, I‘ll bet the Muslims don’t subscribe to this agenda.

      Report Post »  
    • 13th Imam
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 4:42pm

      Now they are only banning them. Usually they enjoy slicing them up.Those wacky DEMOCRATS

      Report Post » 13th Imam  
    • Contrarian51
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 6:08pm

      Wow, what a stunner. The DNC is anti-baby. Well, more funding for Planned Parenthood and maybe they won’t have this problem in the future.

      Report Post »  
    • DEMOCRATS.ARE.EVIL
      Posted on August 28, 2012 at 7:34am

      If the Democrats don’t want young children at their convention, why don’t they just kill them? Isn’t that what they do? Why should this be any different?

      Report Post » DEMOCRATS.ARE.EVIL  
  • AnAmerican111
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 11:55am

    Who cares?…If the DNC banned stupid people than no one would be allowed in!……………………………………………………

    Report Post »  
  • PilgrimStuckInBizarroWorld
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 11:39am

    The Dem’s “war on babies” going FORWARD! LOL

    Report Post »  
    • CatB
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 11:47am

      Everyone please share with all (any?) Democrat friends ;-) Babies need I.D. but voters don’t??? Abortion good .. babies BAD.

      Report Post »  
    • jcldwl
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 11:56am

      Oh come on it‘s Bush’s fault.

      Report Post » jcldwl  
  • jokar
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 11:36am

    Hmmm, the Dems say everyone needs credentials….is that like asking for identification when a person wants to vote?!! I thought that was racist?

    Report Post »  
    • copatriots
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 11:56am

      Dems also require ID for children coming into the WH. Track, track, track…..unless you’re dead and voting.

      Report Post »  
    • STGCSSW
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 1:39pm

      Credentials are important. Remember when the Obama children went on “tour” credentialed as “Senior Advisors”. Hey, anyone can be a senior adivsor in the Obama adminstration and they can get proper ID if necessary… but not to vote, nope, never to vote. That is racists, just ask the black guy in the Oval Office and all his narrow minded minions in the media.

      Report Post » STGCSSW  
    • chips1
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 1:56pm

      If showing ID’s is against the Dems policy, just tell them your child is 28 years old and is just slow to mature.

      Report Post »  
  • Anonymous T. Irrelevant
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 11:35am

    I wasn’t sure any Democrat women HAD children, since most of them don’t want to be burdened with them. They get in the way of career advancement, dates, vacations, kennels won’t accept babies, etc.

    Report Post » Anonymous T. Irrelevant  
    • OniKaze
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 11:47am

      That’s what I thought…. I didn’t see it being a problem, but apparently I was wrong…

      Report Post » OniKaze  
    • neidermeyer
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 12:19pm

      Anonymous ,, you’re forgetting the welfare mothers… and the recent Mexican immigrant women ,, but I’m repeating myself.

      Report Post » neidermeyer  
    • term limits for congress
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 12:23pm

      The ban is aimed at the lesbians. They have the babies. For the 2012 season, Russian babies are in vogue. One ‘natural born’ baby is acceptable, the others should be Russian. Last year’s popular baby selection was Romanian babies.

      The DNC has realized that they have exceeded their lesbian quota and they’re now afraid that their convention will be a boob-fest. One way or another (babies, or not), there will be boobs blowin’ in the wind all over that convention. Bet we’ll see some interesting tats!

      Report Post »  
  • Beachbaby
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 11:30am

    Makes sense since the dems are all babykillers and lesbians.

    Report Post »  
    • Ray2447
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 2:53pm

      Proper Credentials? How ironic. The only form of I.D. most babies have is a – - – clear and valid birth certificate.

      Report Post »  
  • txannie
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 11:29am

    The dems are just showing their true colors.

    Report Post » txannie  
  • two4america
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 11:21am

    I thought it was the Republicans that have the “war on women”? At least that‘s how the Democrats portray the Republicans that are against taxpayers paying for some women’s choice of birth control or abortion. How about the Democrats’ war on babies? Maybe it is just the unborn babies, or is it?

    Report Post »  
  • OneTermPresident
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 11:18am

    The goofy Dems.. probably want to see a Photo ID too…

    Report Post » OneTermPresident  
  • bekhiet
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 10:09am

    Perhaps if they allow babies to come, it would be a good time to start micro chipping babies. For safety reasons of course…

    Report Post »  
    • turkey13
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 11:32am

      Can you blame Obama! I have 4 grandsons all under age 10 and at least 1 of them always seems to have a runny nose. I don‘t mind kissing my G sons but you won’t catch me kissing someone elses snot nosed kid. Why do you think Obama supports Q_ueers and L_izzies getting married – no kids. If the USA is to feed the rest of the world we have to start cutting down on our population right now. I bet that within the next 10 years there will be a quota on how many kids you can have. Obama has already stepped up to the plate and said, “If one of his daughters made a mistake that he wouldn’t want that kid to run her life.” This is his potential grand child he was talking about. Me personally – I couldn’t face one of my kids if they had aborted one of my grandkids.

      Report Post »  
  • bekhiet
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 10:06am

    I just love watching them hang themselves…

    Report Post »  
  • Constructionist
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 10:03am

    Since when do feminists care about children? I thought the whole point was not having children so they could focus on corporate success and political activism.

    Report Post » Constructionist  
  • doomytram
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 10:03am

    Oblamer‘s and Axelrod’s war on Women and Children! Their less compassionate than the Red Chinese and are serving Dog and Crap Sandwiches to their hapless group of Lefty Terrorist’s at their ridiculous Convention. In truth, The Military, The working, The Proud American’s have run away from these American Commies that are known as Democrat Obamunist..

    Report Post » doomytram  
  • Eric_The_Red_State
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 10:01am

    Are the babies dead? Dem’s love dead babies

    Report Post » Eric_The_Red_State  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 12:37pm

      @Eric_The_Red_State
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 10:01am

      Are the babies dead? Dem’s love dead babies
      ***
      Gee, do you suppose in 2016 they’ll have an abortionist on standby to solve the problem? (Covered by obamacare of course and according to rumors I’ve read, to one of his advisers that would include up to the age of 8 yrs old.)

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
    • biohazard23
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 3:37pm

      Don’t worry, the Dems and ACORN will make sure all of those aborted babies are registered to vote.

      Report Post » biohazard23  
  • barber2
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 10:00am

    Democrats have rules ? Democrats must have ” credentials?” Isn‘t that like voter ID’s ? I thought Democrats were against IDs ? Oh, the hypocrisy of the Far Left .

    Report Post »  
    • biohazard23
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 11:26am

      Don’t state the obvious. It will just confuse a liberal.

      Report Post » biohazard23  
  • Texas Hills Patriot
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 10:00am

    “children are the key to women”. Would that be the ones were allowed to be born, or the ones women chose to kill in the womb?

    Report Post » Texas Hills Patriot  
    • Mandors
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 10:02am

      For the DNC, that would be the latter.

      Report Post » Mandors  
    • OhSuzieQ
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 10:05am

      Right !

      Report Post » OhSuzieQ  
    • Deborah
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 12:24pm

      Of course, pregnant women are allowed in–ONLY if they can provide proof of an upcoming scheduled abortion.

      Report Post » Deborah  
  • yougottabekidding
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 10:00am

    Talk about your war on women!
    Don’t you have to have ID for your kids too?
    But you don’t want ID to vote, you surprise military vote.
    How many sides do you have to that mouth? Usually it”s out of
    both sides this seems like alot more.

    Report Post »  
  • RJJinGadsden
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 9:59am

    These Dem-wits step out of one bucket of sh/t and into another, and another. But, the MSM will never mention this.
    This is hilarious though. What will they ban next in the sake of humanity and equal rights?

    Report Post » RJJinGadsden  
  • lamarlamar
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 9:57am

    Who is behind the “war” on women?

    Report Post »  
  • watersRpeople
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 9:57am

    It’s hardly a difficult task for Democrats to ban babies from the DNC when it is they can actively engage their support of banning babies in the womb – it hardly takes any self mental conditioning to ban babies from all other places.

    Report Post »  
  • momrules
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 9:57am

    Goody……something finally rattled the cage of the feminists, something that the ungodly way Islam treats women has never done.

    The DNC outlaws babies but trucks in Muslims by the thousands to their convention. LOL at the stupidity of some women.

    Report Post »  
  • Tri-ox
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 9:56am

    The only babies that democrats approve of are aborted babies. As we all know, the democrat party is the party that does not want women to be “burdened” with children; the democrat party is the anti-family, anti-women, anti-marriage, pro-abortion party.

    Report Post » Tri-ox  
  • Skippy_John_Jones
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 9:56am

    “Women are the key to a Democratic victory, and sometimes, children are the key to women,” Steinem said in a statement. “It’s both right and smart for the Democratic Convention to behave as if children exist.”

    But I thought liberals only liked aborted children.

    Report Post » Skippy_John_Jones  
  • 502_eagle
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 9:53am

    LOL, oh the compassion…………………

    Report Post » 502_eagle  
  • copatriots
    Posted on August 27, 2012 at 9:53am

    BWAHAHAHAHAHA…….the Dems just loooooove women and babies.

    Report Post »  
    • biohazard23
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 10:01am

      Only until their usefulness wears out.

      Report Post » biohazard23  
    • OhSuzieQ
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 10:03am

      Perhaps this will wake up the Dem Mommies up.

      Report Post » OhSuzieQ  
    • copatriots
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 11:55am

      They don’t even love them then, BIO. A pawn is always a pawn to a Progressive. I don’t know how they keep up with their hypocrisy and lies. Well, maybe they aren’t……they are seeming to come unglued. I have a strange feeling about the DNC. What’s with the Dems telling their members to stay home this year? And sending Biden to the RNC then having him not go? Another BLAZER posted a link saying the Dems are bussing in 20,000 Muslims to Charlotte. It all seems very strange.

      OHSUZIE, would be nice but I remain skeptical. Dems are one brainwashed group.

      Sorry to both for the delay. Blaze was having technical difficulties with comments. :-)

      Report Post »  
    • biohazard23
      Posted on August 27, 2012 at 12:22pm

      CoPats, true that. And things are getting curiouser and curiouser…..

      Report Post » biohazard23  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In