Dick Cheney: Hillary ‘Might Have Been Easier’ to Work With, Says There‘s ’Probably’ a Liberal Media Bias
- Posted on September 4, 2011 at 2:37pm by
Madeleine Morgenstern
- Print »
- Email »
Former Vice President Dick Cheney said Sunday that if Hillary Clinton were president instead of Barack Obama, things today might be different in the country.
Cheney wasn’t too specific, but suggested “perhaps she might have been easier for some of us who are critics of the president to work with.”
“I have the sense that she’s one of the more competent members of the current administration, and it would be interesting to speculate about how she might perform if she’d be president,” Cheney said, appearing on “Fox News Sunday.“ ”I don’t want to be in the position where I’m supporting Hillary Clinton. That might be the kiss of death for her.
Mediaite has the clip below:
Cheney has been all over the news lately as part of an effort to promote his just-released memoir, “In My Time.” Former Secretaries of State Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice both fired back at some of the content in the former vice president’s book, saying he had taken “cheap shots.”
In response, Cheney said he takes nothing back.
Host Chris Wallace also asked Cheney whether he thought there’s a liberal bias in the mainstream media, airing a clip from Cheney’s recent appearance on “The Today Show” in which the camera quickly zoomed out to focus on a person holding a sign that said “Investigate Cheney.”
“I think there probably is but I don’t spend a lot of time worrying about it,” Cheney said, noting that there are a “lot of outlets out there now” for conservatives to have their voices heard. “There are a lot of people out there who don’t like me, don’t agree with what I did in public life, disagree fundamentally with my views. It’s OK, it’s democracy.”
Cheney also brushed off a recent claim from Powell’s former chief of staff Lawrence Wilkerson that Cheney wrote his book to assert himself so as not to be tried for war crimes.
“Well that’s news to me,” Cheney said. “I don’t pay a lot of attention to Mr. Wilkerson. I don’t know him….I know he speaks out from time to time, and that strikes me as a cheap shot.”





















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (63)
Glenn in Virginia
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 9:18pmLooney Leftists like to claim Bush was just Cheney’s puppet.
Ah, if only it had been so!
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 7:26pmOf Course!
And why is that?
Because LIBERAL and NEOCON ideologies fit like PUZZLE PIECES!
MODERN LIBERALS AND NEOCONS ARE THE SAME THING!
WARMONGERS!
Obama arbitrarily starts wars based on “Humanitarian Obligation”, a farce and proven lie as the Arabic muslim Al Qaeda “rebels” slaughter and incarcerate black Libyans without discretion, while admitting that he’s doing it to legitimize the UN, while Bush simply arbitrarily starts foreign wars based on PROVEN LIES!
The President and VP are NEVER HELD ACCOUNTABLE while whistleblowers and appointed heads roll!
Report Post »thecrow
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 6:24pmhttp://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2011/05/10/sing-it-out/
Report Post »Patriot nurse
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 6:15pmDick,Love ya brother.I believe from the bottom of my heart you are a true Patriot ! If GW had listened to you we wouldn‘t be in the pinch we’re in now.Right ?You are a leader,and I don’t give a dern what anyone says.You are right on.I think you should write some more books and give us the value of your wisdom.
Report Post »saranda
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 5:56pmWhy does this guy still get airtime? He may have been the brains in the Bush admin but look how that turned out.
Report Post »BUDDY LITTLE
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 6:55pmYOU ARE TOTALY RIGHT ,between him working for big oil and banks and leading G.W. By the nose the sold us to WALLSTREET!!
Report Post »BluifoxEd
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 7:13pmWhy. What did he do?
Report Post »PoliticalJunkieToo
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 6:30amChaney may have had Haliburton but Obama has big unions, Goldman Sachs and other investment banks, lawyers, and eco thugs INSIDE HIS ADMINISTRATION. In 2008, big companies gave the vast majority of money to Obama. In comparison, Bush/Chaney is not near as threatening. Obama surpassed them in terms of corruption.
Also, Chaney is so much more intelligent than Obama. Obama CONSTANTLY repeats himself and his statements are full of crap (as in he didn’t know how many states there were and said Canada had a president, corpse, etc. etc.) and when he is not repeating himself or saying stupid things, he says AHHH and UMMMMM a lot. Obama the Oracle – NOT.
Report Post »Tracking
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 5:51pmYou just cannot shut these politicans up even after they leave office. I’ve had enough of almost all of them, on both sides.
Chaney will say and do anything to justify what he and Bush did. I believe not a word he says. He does though. He wanst to sell a book. Money. Shut up, go home and leave the world a better place and be quiet. No one beleives much of anything you have to say. After all, what else are you going to say? Admit wrong doings? Say you’re stupid or got us into wars with no credible intel?
Sing your own praises because no one else in their right mind is going to.
Report Post »BluifoxEd
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 7:16pmRelax. You don‘t have to watch anyone or read about anyone or even listen to anyone if you don’t want. That’s what freedom is all about!
Report Post »LookTowardsTheLight
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 12:20am@Tracking
Leave the world a better place? Have you turned on a TV in the last 3 years?
Report Post »Tracking
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 5:44pmI would have to take hundreds of Xanax to believe Chaney or Bush and I am an Independent. I do think that THEY believe their own lies and will do whatever it takes to justify their wars and actions.
They attacked the wrong country. Blamed the wrong people. 15 out of the 19 terrorists in the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Centers were SAUDI. No charges, no investigations and nothing has ever been done against Saudi Arabia. Not even so much as a small sanction. Why? Because of the Oil crisis ( OPEC) which they RULE, in the 1970′s when they refused to give us any oil. Gas shortages everywhere. A quiet secret deal was made with them if they would turn back on the oil production, we agreed that we would leave the House of Saud intact, the Royal Saudi family. We would leave them alone in the then and in future. And we have. Even though they support and fund terrorism against us, every day and all over the world.
We mess with them in any way, we have no oil, no gas, no nothing and they know it. Usama bin Laden was Saudi, born Saudi and from Saudi Arabia,and a rich Saudi family who supported him and his terrorist activities. All over the World. Saudi terrorists funding.
Report Post »Ask youself why? It still continues to this day and rarely do you even hear the word Saudi. They also fund presidential elections and funded Obama, big time.
Do a little reading and educate yourselves. Iraq and muslim Iraqi’s did NOT attack us. The Saudis did and still do.
Aqualung1000
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 7:34pmPeople come on now, there is no panic for Oil. Period!! Up here in Canada we have enough Oil to last at least another 100 years. Put the pressure on your Congressperson to ‘BUILD THE PIPELINE’ then to H3LL with OPEC!
Report Post »LookTowardsTheLight
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 12:09am@Tracking
Blah blah blah. You are not independent, just confused. From what you say you are basically a leftist liberal without a clue. Now go back to the Huffington Compost where you belong.
@Aqualung1000
You Canadians have been a great Allie for decades. You have fought with us through thick and thin and Americans should be proud to call you neighbors! Believe me, I would love to tell OPEC to kiss our @ss and take our money (and troops) out of Middle Earth for good. However, as much as the pipeline would help both our Countries, too many cry baby no nothing liberal environmental nut jobs would through everything including the kitchen sink at such a proposal.
Report Post »LookTowardsTheLight
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 12:14am@Tracking
Hey moron, we know Iraq didn’t attack us. Would you rather we stand around with our thumbs up our @sses waiting for them to do something? People like you probably were against anything after the the attacks of 9/11/01. You most likely would have liked the country to just shrug it off and forget that OVER 2,000 AMERICANS DIED!
Report Post »Bill Rowland
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 5:57amIf the environmentalists would let us drill there is enough oil in Alaska and offshore to last us for years and years. Just the threat of drilling would knock the price of oil down. OPEC knows we have a reserve that will outlast theirs and more natural gas they can ever produce.
Drill baby drill!!
Psalm 109:8
Report Post »palerider54
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 5:26pmYour an A-hole for abusing this site.
I reported you and suggested you be banned from future posts.
Report Post »Elena2010
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 4:30pmAh, the basic difference between a politician and an ideologue!
Report Post »squeaker
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 4:25pmhillary…. – ya still can’t make a silk purse out of a pigs ear…
Report Post »endgamer
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 4:24pmCheney you’re a liar.. In fact it may have been much worse with Hillary because she is much more intelligent that the ass clown in the WH now. Hillary is super pro NWO and she would have made sure the ovens in the FEMA camps were burning the bodies of the ones killed by the New World Order bankers.
Report Post »LookTowardsTheLight
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 12:17am@endgamer
Typical loony Mad Doctor supporter. It‘s the same rehearsed rhetoric that’s puts the rest of us to zzzzzzz.
Report Post »olddog
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 4:15pmHey any one else think there May be media Bias you know right here in America????
Report Post »squeaker
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 4:27pmno way… how could that be… here…? really…
Report Post »POdVet
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 4:05pmIt’s amazing how people still refuse to use their brains! Talk about Hillary not having enough time to win the nomination..BS! The nomination was stolen through fraud by the DNC. They even violated their own rules to give Obama votes he was not entitled to. And that isn’t even bringing up the rampant proven caucus fraud. Others talk about how Hillary care was luckily stopped blah blah blah. Look at how it was actually stopped before you compare it to Obamacare. Newt and other criminal Republicans used a version of Obamacare to stop what the Clintons tried to do. The Republicans counter proposal that forced the Clintons to abandon the attempt at healthcare reform was passed by Obama. Written by the same insurance and drug company lobbyists!
Don’t like Hillary Clinton on issues fine. But when you just follow the old gaurd R’s word for things without using whats between your ears. Then you are no better than an Obamaton. Thats how we ended up with that moron GW for 8 years!
I have a dream, and in that dream all criminal politicians are made to account for their actions. In that dream GW Bush and Barrack Hussein Obama share a cell in a federal penitentiary for the rest of their worthless lives.
Report Post »Da Kingfish
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 5:35pmGW kept your useless ass from terror attacks so you could spout your BS mouth.
Report Post »dissentnow
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 3:48pmProbably a liberal media bias? Probably?……Geez, Dick, i guess that once you are status quo you’re always status quo. Its funny how the neoconservatives and the elite liberals always end up on the same side. Globalists, anyone?
Report Post »hauschild
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 4:16pmCheney’s a deadly serious S.O.B. and I just don’t think he fits the mold of an elitist. Just because he made a name for himself in business and politics doesn‘t mean he doesn’t yearn for the same things we do. I think he tries to take the high road and leave the name calling to goofballs like me. What else do you really need to know about him other than he’s steadfastly conservative in terms of defense, taxes and traditional American values. He’s the last of dying breed.
Report Post »dissentnow
Posted on September 5, 2011 at 6:44amI never said that he was an elitist. I said that he was a neoconservative. For the record, he is NOT conservative on defense. Nation building, policing the world, and interventionism are neoconservative views. Neoconservatism came from liberalism. Also, he has a very liberal view on spending. How much did we add to our national debt because of his interventionism? How much did we borrow from communist China?
Report Post »Don’t even get me started on the patriot act and the constitution.
Mr. Cheney may be a lot of things but conservative is not one of them.
LinkedIn G
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 3:43pmThe only difference between Obama and Hillary is pants size.
Report Post »mrsmileyface
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 8:37pmHillary has a bigger set of balls.
Report Post »ddg7
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 3:40pmDick,
Thanks for the endorsement soundbite!
Your friend,
Report Post »Hillary
riseandshine
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 7:19pmCriminals both
Report Post »ddg7
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 3:39pmGive the man a break. He’s trying to sell his book. Were he to just out and out say the media WAS bias he might lose out on a few sales. At this point in his life book sales are way more important than integrity.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 3:31pmIf Hillary had more time in the 2008 campaign, I believe she would have beaten Obama in the Primaries. Towards the end, she (and the stain on America-Bill) stepped up the attacks on his character and background, or lack thereof, but it was all too late in the game.
If John McCain would have just repeated Hillary’s words and slapped the goat-snot out of him… he may have beaten him. McCain probably would have stunk up the room as POTUS, but compared to what we have…
Report Post »NHABE64
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 3:28pmI think Dick Cheney has been eaiting too many hostss twinkies. Hillary Clintn may have been easier to deal with than this super radical sick inidividual who calls himself princess Obama, but as Clinton once said she calls herself a “moderate” progressive. Give me a break, she is a damn socialist!!
Report Post »Tracking
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 5:31pmYou are absolutely correct. Hillarys’ best friend is George Soros & she literally sings his praises & has even given speeches and press releases about Soros. ( c-span.org)
She also wroteher 78 page thesis proclaiming the goodness & praises of Saul Alinsky.
Bill Clinton was the first President ever to leave office with so many charges against him.
LEFT OFFICE WITH BEING CHARGED WITH:
Dis-barment.
Lying to a Federal Grand Jury.
Guilty of Perjury.
Sued for sex crimes.
Sued for sexual harassment.
Failed to earn the respect of the Military who refused to do an about face when he left office & got in the helicopter to leave White House.
The Star Report we will never see until he has passed away. Even the Democrats were appalled when they read it and they refused to be seen with him unless they could not help it.
He did indeed leave a legacy of disrespect for the White House, His Office, His family & himself. No respect for his position or this country & it’s people.
The democrats said ( after reading the report on him) that he was a Rapist roaming the halls of the White House.
The last thing we need is another Clinton in the White House. Oh…how soon we forget the Clintons.
Hillary also, if I’m not mistaken, attended the Socialist Scholars Conferences, as did Obama. He attended every single one, along with his leftist friends.
Report Post »Socialist have always felt they are better fit to rule the working class b/c of Ivy League educations. Regardless of their grades in
welovetheUSA
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 3:26pmHillary-Bill have too much power as it is……….we want new faces, no more politicians who think the can rule this country, no more rulers…….get them all out of Washington.
Report Post »Da Kingfish
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 5:40pmThis should piss you off, a must read, the new world………http://media.causes.com/1098660?p_id=179631924&s=fb_feed&ref=nf
Report Post »WhoIsTheCoon
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 3:20pmCouncil of Foreign relations members always bend over to do what is right for another. Hilldawg and Cheney are both CFR members.
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 4:04pmSo’s Obama, their all “globalist’s” NWO strategists, planners, and change agents spreading “democracy” around the world. Democracy=mob rules=totalitarianism. They love the UN and NATO too, enough said.
Report Post »MARCH4HIM
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 3:18pmCHRISMADDEN
Report Post »you have been reported
GOOD BYE !!!
Hickory
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 3:14pmThe difference between Obama and Hillary is that Hillary actually knows what she is talking about. You might not like what she is saying or doing but, she knows what the deal is. Obama a just an affirmative action empty suit.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 3:25pmOne thing to consider is the fact that a Progressive like Mr Obama is the same as a Progressive like Hillary Clinton.
The only difference being is that Hillary-care went down in flames; while they managed to pass the monstosity of Obama-care and seize the student loan program (except for one bank a senator owns).
Report Post »Stoic one
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 3:05pmthis is all distraction…..
how about bios of ALL the GOP contenders?\
just a thought Blaze
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 3:22pmHow about a BIO of BARRY?? College transcripts.?? College Grades?? College Boyfriends?? College Drug Deals??
Report Post »Rayblue
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 2:43pmHe doesn‘t want to be in the position where he’s supporting Hillary Clinton.
Since that might be the kiss of death for her.
Does anyone else see something wrong with that statement ?
Report Post »Exrepublisheep
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 2:53pmI think he‘s trying to pump up Hillary so she’ll weaken Obama. Kind of like promoting Palin.
Report Post »SamIamTwo
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 3:01pmThe difference between Hillary and Obama is that Hillary is a believer, and Obama is a true believer.
Report Post »Socialism_Is_The_New_Black
Posted on September 4, 2011 at 4:00pmWhat EXREPUB said!
Report Post »