Dick Morris Calls Ron Paul ‘The Most Liberal, Radical Left-Wing Person to Run for President’
- Posted on December 29, 2011 at 8:38am by
Jonathon M. Seidl
- Print »
- Email »
If you ever get the chance to ask regular Fox commentator (and former Democratic strategist) Dick Morris what he thinks about Ron Paul, make sure you have a camera or a microphone close. That’s because after what he said last night (and in the past) about Paul on “The O’Reilly Factor,” he’s likely to give you quite a quote.
Morris didn’t hold back at all when fill-in host Eric Bolling asked him about the presidential candidate.
After calling Ron Paul’s rise in the polls recently “horrible,” he let loose: “I think that he is absolutely the most liberal, radical left-wing person to run for president in the United States in the last 50 years.”
He then noted all the ways in which Paul is more liberal than Barack Obama, including saying “we caused 9/11“ and wanting to ”dismantle the military.”
“This guy is no conservative. This guy is a ultra, ultra left-wing radical,” he concluded.
You can listen to it all below:
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 684 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 533 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 438 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 373 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 331 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 286 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 293 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 177 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 148 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 301 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 286 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (884)
SpankDaMonkey
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:18am.
Report Post »Does it really matter anymore?……………..
AhLeahIris
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:23amOf course it matters. Why would I take the serial toe -scker’s word for it? Besides, I certainly don’t agree with Paul on many things, but thanks to this, I understand his philosophy: http://wp.me/p1HGwx-1O4
Report Post »ConservativeCharlie
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:30amDick Morris is running for cover, I seen him a few weeks ago say Ron Paul would absolutly not win Iowa.. Boy does he feel stupid now, he is running for cover. Its ok to be wrong sometimes, But Dick Morris is starting to get compltetly out of touch with the American People.
Report Post »KTsayz
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:32amI’m going to believe anything this guy says when he had was stupid enough to write this article?
HOW CLINTON WILL WIN THE NOMINATION BY LOSING SOUTH CAROLINA
http://www.dickmorris.com/blog/how-clinton-will-win-the-nomination-by-losing-south-carolina/
HAHAHAHAHA Notice how he has to show a pic of himself on his blog when he was ‘young’ and ‘slim’.
Report Post »He’s looking more like Jabba the Hutt with each passing day. And he’s just as nasty a tool. Shame on Fox for keeping that pig around.
demint.disciple
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:33amAgreed ….
Report Post »Libertyluvnmomma
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:37amDick Morris is a moral slob- the fact the Hannity fraternizes with these @******* lose his credibility.
Report Post »He regularly has on Dick and Rove. Both of them suck b@lls compared to the Quikstop
chips1
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:38amWOW!!! All of the Ron Paul frogs are jumping out of the swamp on this story.
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:44amI am glad that Fox cares enough about us to have Dick and Sarah telling us what to think. They should know we do not change our beliefs just due to reading new facts or hearing somebody’s opinions. Thanks Blaze for showing us the hypocrisy of Fox.
TEA
Report Post »Libertyluvnmomma
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:52amChips1- sounds like you nibble from the pole stuck in your face by the GOP- These boys don’t get conservative. They live in the Sodom of Washington. It has nothing to do with whether I will vote for Paul.
Report Post »Wipe your mouth off.
KICKILLEGALSOUT
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:55amThat’s it, I am completely convinced now. Dick Morris old friend and advisor of Bill Clinton says Dr. Paul is a bad man so I will switch my vote now.
How do these media clowns think we are? I will not compromise my vote and WILL vote for Dr. Paul no matter what. The corrupt media and their establishment hit squad is really scraping the bottom of the barrel trying to do anything to tarnish Dr. Paul’s good name. Too bad it won’t work!
Report Post »escape_from_socialism
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:00amIf Dick sat Paul is liberal, it means Paul is 100 and 10 % conservative.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:00amKnow why Fox lets Morris do the most-terrible “Ron Paul bashing” ???
Fox knows they can fire Morris when Dr. Paul wins! LOL
Morris is Fox’s “sacrificial lamb” and Morris plays right along. Wonder if he’s really that stupid, or he just gets paid so much by Fox that he’s willing to play that role?
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:01amThese are completely false statements..Paul did not come up with 9/11 was blowback on his own.. Paul merely gave us the results to the CIA investigations..
Report Post »Lie 2..Morrris said that Paul wants to dismantle the military…Paul wants to bring our military home and build it here..and when war is declared as a Congressional decision..we go in..win get out.
I was going to have my satelite disconnected before before the last elections because I hated C N N..but they gave me F O X N E W S..so I was happy, then soometime around the elections..I heard an Arab had bought in. Someone told me that all of their debates are completely staged..and the guy who most resembes Morris on the left was talking about how it’s all staged..so they often present arguments that are not even their own viewpoints…it’s all done to entertain and sway public opinion. I just had my satelite disconnected.
simply one voice
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:02amWithout Sarah Palin as our country’s choice, Obama and Hillary will finish off America, our Constitution and Bill of rights, enslave us all, and come up with any lie to steal your savings and retirement funds throughout taxation without representation. So, it really Matters. But, how do you stop the Mafia that runs everything in Washington, D.C.?
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:14amWhy Morris speaks as he does:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAl5JhMQ-8s
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:16amQuestion to you Paulites: I have been wondering if your insulting nature is possible o go towards Obama? I want proof if so. Yes I want the same insults right now at Obama. What do you really think of him?
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:23amIn the first place..Morris is lying to discredit Paul..yes..most of us were shocked when Paul said that 9/11 was our fault..but this was the findings of the CIA and I guess the media didn;t see fit to tell us about it because then we wouldn’t have been approving of one trillion dollar policing of the world. The dismantling of our military..a complete lie and fabrication. People need to stop relying on mainstream media and start investigating for themselves..All the “Status Quo” GOP nominees are Agenda 21 NWO people..
Report Post »They do what they are told..no differenent than the current George Soros Boy. The World Economic Collapse was foretold before The George Soros (who’ famous for collapsing governments and changing regimes) boy went in…The only way to save America is a Constitutionalist. I had a hard time wrapping my head around some of Paul’s policies too..but I kept him on a back burner for an emergency.Well folks this is an emergency..Soon to be 17.5 trillion in the hole.to avoid a government shutdown.that happens..and it will..no miltary…no defense..UN..MARSHALL LAW..FEMA CAMPS.. Paul will cut one trillion the first year.balance us in three..No time for nit picking WAKE UP AMERICA WAKE UP!!!!!!!
simply one voice
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:24amTry Absolute Traitor To America. Far, far worse than Benedict Arnold.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:24amSo, now if you want to follow our Constitution your a is a Left Wing Radical ? How did we get to these point in history?
Report Post »KTsayz
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:24amWhy we need President Ron Paul
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a14ktflduO0&feature=related
Vote for the Constutution. Vote for economic freedom. Vote for individual sovereignty. Vote Ron Paul.
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:29amDoes Faux News actually think that Dick Morris is going to decide who I vote for?
Seriously?
Desperation. How does a democrap get on Faux News and make these comments… oh yea. I know why.
Because Faux News carries Obama’s water and there are no real conservatives on Faux news except maybe Judge Napolitano. The entire mainstream media is left-leaning. Fox claims to be center-right (but they carry Obama’s water), MSNBC is unabashedly leftist, CNN tries to perpetrate as center-left but they’re definitely leftist. Neocons are liberals’ folks.
Overall the media is in the pocket of Obama. Neocons at Fox would rather have Obama over Ron Paul because Obama will continue Neocon Bush’s preemptive War Strategy under the transparent camoflage called Humanitarian Aid.
Period. Neocons DO NOT CARE about our economy. “WAR WAR WAR—Screw the Economy” is their mantra.
Ron Paul 2012. Defeat the Warmongers.
Report Post »DrFrost
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:31amCheck out http://www.conservative.org. The ACU has been ranking our politicians voting records for decades. Ron Paul does not have the most conservative record in any given year (there’s always several that score 100%) but he is consistently in the 90′s. To say that he is “left” in any widely accepted meaning of the word is patently false.
Is he radical? I would say yes. On some issues does he agree with liberals? Yes. But even in these areas his reasons are very different from liberal ideology (i.e. motivated by fiscal conservatism and/or personal freedom). Is his foreign policy naive? In the extreme! But for Dick to call the man liberal is very misleading. IMO he’s done himself and his employer a disservice.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:35am@PATRICK HENRY11 We think that the status Quo RINOS are bought and paid for just like Obama..NWO people.
Report Post »They are all for
Big government
Policing the world
Sending money to tyranus countries
Sending tax dollars to Israel’s enemies
UN
TARP sending money to Sharia Compliant Banks building of Islam
taking of our liberties freedom of speech through SOPA..Patriot Act..Indefinite Detention.kidnapping American citizens off the street and holding them indefnitly never to be seen or heard from again
Collapsing our government
Since friend to UN..Martial Law
We see Ron Paul as our only way out..the others will follow in line.
None of the rest have a plan to weed out foreign theocracies..Communism and Islam from our government and educationa system.>The COnstitution is the only way to do that.
Stop watching LAME STRESM MEDIA F O X can no longer be trusted
Unix
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:37amYes, it matters NOW more than ever…I have been watching Paul for a long time, he is the ONLY one who would adhere to Constitution…I have my reservations on Paul, with the role of the military, foreign policy…but who else do we have that can beat Obama AND save the country from Progressivism…no my friends, I have watched, read and listened…Ron Paul for President, and I was a big Cain fan, I like Michelle B too, and Sarah…but the rest of them are progressives. RINO’s…we don’t need more of them, just like we don;t need more liberals…I have now firmly grasped Ron Paul’s flag and will vote for him in November…HE is our ONLY chance to turn this ship around, along with re-taking the congress.
I am a constitutional conservative…just to get the record straight!
Viva TEA
Report Post »The_Deviant
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:46amAmazing how these hacks keep trying to tell us what to think. “Ron Paul won’t win”, “Ron Paul is unelectable”, “Ron Paul has terrible foriegn policy”, “Ron Paul is a liberal”. I don’t see much sense in it. It’s as if the RNC and establishment has made it their mandate to tell the american people, “How dare you vote for who you want! You vote for who we tell you!” This happens again and again. Sean Hannity is a hack, who is now speaking out against the Tea Party since the Tea Party doesn’t want one of the establishments candidate. Same with Mark Levin. I used to love that guy. He has scewed Ron Pauls Forigen policy to pieces. I don’t see how cutting entitilements, ending the Fed, and ceasing or Nation Building policy is a Liberal agenda. It is a very conservative agenda. What’s wrong with a foriegn policy that states, “hey, we are cool, but if you f… with us, we are going to blow your friggin country up and not rebuild. That’s on you bud.”
Report Post »I turned my back on the RINO party under the first stimulus package GHWB put through. He was the best democrat the democrats never knew they had. Ron Paul rocks and be damned what the establishment says. I have looked all over for these lies the RINO bots having been spreading. Everytime I look, I like Ron Paul more and more. I have been in the military for 15 years, Served twice overseas. I support Ron Paul and his foriegn policy. No other candidate has really said they would do anything. It’s a
A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 11:06am@Patrick Henry II,
“Question to you Paulites: I have been wondering if your insulting nature is possible o go towards Obama? I want proof if so. Yes I want the same insults right now at Obama. What do you really think of him?”
Obama is intent on destroying this country because, as he said in a recent speech, he doesn’t believe in free markets. He is a globalist intent on violating the rule of law to subjugate Americans to a world government. He is a traitor and deserves to be tried as such, and then to have Congress sentence him to death (Congress gets to choose the punishment, though).
Yes, us Paulites know that four more years of Obama would be desasterous, but what you fail to realize is that the Republican Party has abandoned their Republican principles for a Leftist interventionist foreign policy and for protectionist economic policies (thus giving Capitalism a bad name).
They also see no problem with the Fed, which we Paulites understand is the source of power for big government; And one of the main flips the Republicans have made in foreign policy is from non-interventionism to interventionism.
See here.
War, Ron Paul, and Conservatism
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLUoWhWsOWk
So, we Paulites say that four more years of Obama OR an establishment Republican will further destroy our country.
Report Post »JRook
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 11:10amOther than his stance on Roe v. Wade and the Federal Reserve, Ron Paul positions are the correct ones. Particularly with respect to focusing on the US and staying out of other people’s business.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 11:17amh8_liberals
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:55am
I encourage EVERYONE to check this out……
it is a report that came out in 2004 categorizing every person who served or is still serving congress from 1937-2002. It was 3,320 people listed from most liberal to most conservative… RON PAUL came in at #3,320 as MOST CONSERVATIVE….nice try, Dick….
http://voteview.com/is_john_kerry_a_liberal.htm
Report Post »TexasHunter
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 11:24amI just wanted to visit the past again and check this old web site to see what the AWSholes are up to.
It is amazing how much they fear RP. Please my fellow Americans get out and vote for our Constitution of America. For our Rights to be back in the American hand. The True Americans hands. 2012 will be the greatest year for America. Please look at this link and keep informed.
TEA
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/arrests-begin-at-occupy-wall-st-as-protesters-march-on-financial-district/
Report Post »simply one voice
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 11:29amDoes anyone here at all REALIZE that while the Congress and Senate recessed for Christmas, Obama waited until then to slip two men into the Federal Reserve Board by Presidential Directive??? God Almighty help us, please.
Report Post »Ballot_Box_Revolution
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 11:37amIt doesn’t matter who is calling the names or what channel they are on…..It just doesn’t work anymore…..Anyone with a brain of their own would know that if you wanted to make Ron Paul into a radical of some kind, it would be radical Right…..Only that sounds too nice…..It is obvious this is rhetoric to try to sway.
Even the right is trying to re write history…..what is left and right in America? Come on we know because we watched Glenn Beck. …..Are you cool with this Glenn? The re writing of the meanings of things?….Your little train track deal….Will you stand for the truth and call this guy out, even if you are not for Ron Paul?
Report Post »Ballot_Box_Revolution
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 11:49amPatHenry “I have been wondering if your insulting nature is possible o go towards Obama?”
That is kicking a dead cow…..All the good insults have been used, he has done a good job at hanging himself, and he really doesn’t stand a chance….
In other words it’s a waste of time at the moment…there will be plenty of time for that after the primaries.
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 11:58amThe left-right paradigm is false.
We all want the same thing- personal, financial, and religious freedom.
They cannot allow the false left-right paradigm to be dissolved. They must keep us separate so they can conquer us.
The OWS and Tea Party needs to team up against the establishment neocons and liberals (progressives)…and their common ground is the Federal Reserve and the Congress/Senate.
Congress/Senate is irrelevant as they abdicate power to the executive (which is like your lawyer giving up defending you and throwing himself at the judge’s mercy), and we need to take back our power of a representative government by removing these people legally OR BY FORCE.
NEVER RULE OUT THE USE OF FORCE FOR LIBERTY!
EXTREMISM IN DEFENSE OF LIBERTY IS NO VICE!!!
THE 2ND AMENDMENT PROTECTS THE REST OF THEM!!!
Report Post »PlowMan
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 12:02pmPatrick, I will tell you what will happen if Paul doesn’t win. These nuts will vote for a third party and hand the presidentsey back to Obama. The main reason I don’t like Paul and agree with Morris is that with Paul as president we will get the highest oil prices we have ever seen. (can you say Iran takes over in mid-east?) I say this as a man who will benefit if oil goes up. There are a whole host of other reasons I don’t like Paul but it would be lost on most of the people who frequent this site. So I will refraign.
fatjack
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 12:19pmYou neo-libs crack me up. wuhahahahahahaha
Report Post »TexasHunter
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 12:24pm@PLOWMAN You are worried about oil when our country is turning into a socialism owebama project? Seriously? First off we will always have ties with other countries. We are into to much DEBT to them. What we need to focus on is CUTTING the FEDS, CUTTING the BIG BROTHER GOVERNMENT. CUTTING OUR DEBT. Not raising it another 4 TRILLION dollars!! Come on man, look in our backyard before you try to fish in Iran.
Report Post »Mike N
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 12:31pm.
Report Post »@ SPANKDAMONKEY . . . With an attitude like that, do you matter anymore?
V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 12:39pmPlowMan
One of the things people often miss, dismiss,outright disregard, and ignore is the FACT that the government has ADVANCED ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES that are being deliberately suppressed or reserved for the Military and Continuity of Government (Shadow Government).
We could have the energy crisis solved overnight. If I personally, just me by myself, had something in the range of a few hundred thousand to a million dollars at my disposal, I could have the entire United States completely energy independent in less than a YEAR.
If Ron Paul is elected, I think he will whip out some of those suppressed technologies to give the US an energy advantage that cannot be superceded.
Report Post »Susie
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 12:42pmMorris is correct. Paul is a radical liberal. Think about it honestly folks. He is so rigid in his liberal ideology that it extends to placing all of us in jeopardy. Paul would have us lay down and entrust our protection to who – the United Nations ? We all know what that means.
Report Post »Mr. Oshawott
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 12:58pmWith only shaky claims against Ron Paul such as the one neo-conservative Dick Morris just spouted out, the Faux “News” Channel, as well as the rest of the alphabet propaganda networks, is just one day closer to seeing the status quo being broken apart. It’s Ron Paul 2012 or bust!
Report Post »spankadonkey
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 12:59pmAll you Paulbutz just got your lunch handed to you and you are crying like babies. Morris is spot on. Ron PORKY Paul is a useless fraud and you Paulbutz have fallen for him like your first love. PORKY Paul – what a guy.
Report Post »TexasHunter
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 1:13pmSPANK Please go play with you Obama doll and have him bow down to all the other leaders.
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 1:19pmWrong, WRONG, WRONG! Dick Morris is WRONG, and the ANTI-Paulists on this thread are WRONG!
OKIE, has put you blazers on the correct path
Total Gov (L) ————————————————————– Anarchy (R)
^ ^
Progressivism Constitution
Dick Morris Ron Paul
RADICAL-LEFT wingist Constitutionalist
To ALL you ‘NUT JOBS’ who allow your opinion to be ‘conditioned’ by the MSM and/or Dick Morris/Hannity/Limbaugh/Oreally/Maddow/Olberman/Matthews/McDonell/Sharpton/Coulter/etc, GO DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH!
Are we a Christian nation?
1: Do we do Unto others as we would have them do unto us?
2: Turn the other cheek?
3: Spread message through peace and by example?
4: Would Jesus support Pre-emptive Wars to GO GET em’?
5: Do we LOVE thy enemies?
6: How do you Bless Israel by having VETO power over their foreign policy? Giving 3x the $ to their enemies?
7: Didnt Jesus question the rabbi’s and the powers that be? Instead of blindly accepting?
As a Christian, I find it absurd that faithful people are so hell bent on bringing about WW3 and economic collapse. You rely on the people whom created the mess and expect them to change something!? If you believe/follow people like Morris, youre probably Ra
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 1:31pmTotal Gov (L) ————————————————————– Anarchy (R)
^ ^
Progressivism Constitution
Dick Morris Ron Paul
RADICAL-LEFT wingist Constitutionalist
IF you follow Morris, chances are youre a radical Progressive
Cause4Liberty
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 1:42pmDangit… TheBlaze’s automatic left alignment messes it up:
Total Gov (L) ———————————————————– Anarchy (R)
Report Post »Progressive————————–Constitution
Dick Morris—————————Ron Paul
Radical-left winger——————Constitutionalist
Interventionist———————–Non-interventionist
patriotdale
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 1:48pmYes it matters. Our future is on the line here. Why is it that you so vehemently oppose Mr. Paul when you most likely know nothing more than what you have heard in the mainstream media about him. Recently I too had to stop and questioned what I knew about Ron Paul and his values and decided that as a honest patriot I must take an in depth and honest look at what Ron Paul stands for, as I did with Romney, Newt and Obama. To my surprise I only find a patriot with opinions that closely match my own moderate beliefs maybe a little farther right than I might go, but closer to mine than that of any of the establishment politicians. Yes he appears radical on the surface, but when one takes the time to weigh the meaning of his thoughts we find that they are not so unrealistic. Please don’t take my words for anything, just stop for a short while and take an honest look at all candidates before you continue your blind ignorant attacks. We cannot afford to continue down the path we are now on with social and global spending at its present levels we must if we are going to survive as a nation get back to our constitution. Dick Morris you only make yourself less relevant when you (the pot) call the kettle black, the truth is that the leftist wack appears to be the guy you see in the mirror every morning.
Report Post »Shane74
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 1:48pmReading the anti-Paul comments is both hilarious, and sad.
You people stand AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.
Stop pretending that you even give a rat’s ass about Obama, or defending our liberties. You clearly LIE, repeating the LIE that you hear in your media, which is WHAT YOU TRULY WANT.
You want Obama to succeed in taking this country down. So much so, that if he can’t do it, YOU’LL VOTE FOR THE RINO WHO WILL.
You WANT a war with Iran.
You WANT the FED to secretly print MORE trillions, and give them to the bankers who are taking grip of the world.
You WANT more spending on social programs and WAR.
You WANT all of this to go on and an until we hit the bottom of the ocean.
Then you can just go back and blame Obama, and feel good about yourselves.
********.
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 1:51pmSpankADonkey
You’re a leftist.
Report Post »Veritas Libertas
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 1:54pmReally, Dick? Why would the Constitution loving, conservative GOP allow a total left wing radical run for the nomination of their party? This is someone obfuscating with some twisted pseudo-intellectual babble.
@Patrick Henry II: Obama has accelerated the decent into Socialism faster than any president since FDR (hero of one of the GOP candidates). I rank Obama as the worst president in my lifetime, and likely in the history of our nation. To the far left progs and socialists he can run on his record of “accomplishments” but he won’t dare do that and risk highlighting it again for the vast majority of Americans. To bring this back to the point of the RNC, Obama is precisely the reason people support Dr. Paul. Any other GOP candidate is just a continuation of Obama, but worse because they would be a Judas goat, leading well intentioned but unaware voters down the path of further destruction. The Republic will not survive 4 more years of Obama, but it will also not survive a wolf in sheep’s clothing promising more hope and change while only delivering more deceit and destruction of the Constitution.
Report Post »LimaBean
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 1:55pmCHIPS1….you noticed that as well?
Report Post »symphonic
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 2:20pmDick Morris used to work for CLINTON.
Report Post »riverdog1
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 2:35pmmorris is ALWAYS wrong. why hannity and oreilly ask his opinion is beyond me. fox HATES r paul, especially hannity. i do think paul should NEVER be POTUS.
Report Post »MEANS2RESIST
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 2:35pmThe gig is up Morris….go suck some prostitute toes!
Report Post »Shane74
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 2:38pmOn its Centennial, the Republican Party again calls to the minds of all Americans the great truth first spoken by Abraham Lincoln: “The legitimate object of Government is to do for a community of people whatever they need to have done but cannot do at all, or cannot so well do, for themselves in their separate and individual capacities. But in all that people can individually do as well for themselves, Government ought not to interfere.”
Our great President Dwight D. Eisenhower has counseled us further: “In all those things which deal with people, be liberal, be human. In all those things which deal with people’s money, or their economy, or their form of government, be conservative.”
We will ever fight the demoralizing influence of inflation as a national way of life. We are proud to have fulfilled our 1952 pledge to halt the skyrocketing cost of living that in the previous 13 years had cut the value of the dollar by half, and robbed millions of the full value of their wages, savings, insurance, pensions and social security.
We have balanced the budget. We believe and will continue to prove that thrift, prudence and a sensible respect for living within income applies as surely to the management of our Government’s budget as it does to the family budget.
We hold that the major world issue today is whether Government shall be the servant or the master of men. We hold that the Bill of Rights is the sacred foundation of personal liberty.
-Republican platform,
Report Post »scheduler
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 3:02pmIdiot.
http://politicalbowl.com – Political Videos
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 3:22pmEven when gun rights come up, Ron Paul is the most conservative:
2012 Presidential Candidates – Gun Owners Of America
http://www.gunowners.org
Ron Paul A+
Report Post »Rick Perry A
Michelle Bachmann A
Rick Santorum B-
Newt Gingrich C
Mitt Romney D-
Tower7_TRUTH
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 3:47pmBLAZERS better wake up to the Truth
http://www.infowars.com/slow-kill-holocaust-proof-the-government-is-killing-you/
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 3:52pm@JRook,
“Other than his stance on Roe v. Wade and the Federal Reserve, Ron Paul positions are the correct ones.”
His stance on Roe v. Wade is that the federal government has no say regarding what the states choose to do about crime, including murder, which includes abortion. Each state should decide what their abortion laws should be.
He is personally against abortion because it’s murder, but he knows that you don’t solve a problem like this by giving more power to a central government, because that power can always be abused later, if representatives of which you don’t approve get into power.
Regarding his position on the Federal Reserve, please watch this.
See here.
Smashing Myths and Restoring Sound Money | Thomas E. Woods, Jr.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAzExlEsIKk
And here.
Economic Cycles Before the Fed | Thomas E Woods, Jr.
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxcjT8T3EGU
THEUNKNOWNPATRIOT
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 3:52pmYea, I guess following the Constitution is a pretty radical idea these days, but I wouldn’t ever say Paul is on the Left of things.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 4:26pmWhether you like Ron Paul or not you must ask why Fox even has Dick Morris on their show. Dick is a Progressive plain and simple.
Dick shows he is either stupid or dumb by saying Ron is a “liberal”. A simple picture shows just that.
Total==============================================Anarchy
Gov ^ ^
Constitution
Intervention Non-Intervention
Liberal Conservative
Conservatives are least likely to intervene in domestic issues or foreign issues. Conservatives are the most reserve and believe the least amount of Government possible (Government Intervention) the better.
Ron Paul wants to role BACK Government intervention in fiscal policies. (end fiscal programs)
Ron Paul wants to role BACK Government intervention in foreign policies. (end policing world)
Ron Paul wants to role BACK Government intervention in social policies. (end Government telling States what their people can eat)
Ron Paul is to the RIGHT of all the Candidates because Ron Paul is the MOST CONSERVATIVE.
Dick simply wants to help the Progressive Right get
Report Post »Luke611
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 5:12pmDick Morris…what the hell does it matter what MORRIS said? I wouldn’t call Paul a left-tist radical, I’d identify him as a right-wing radical; but the other items Morris acclaimed is EXACTLY what Paul has pointed in the DEBATES. He does wish to dismantle the military, Four years ago in the CNN debate he let his position be known to remove the FBI, He has spoken on the issue to take the Amsterdam apporoach with legalizing certian drugs, he debates legalizing “coke” and pot will reduce crime on the border and migrant states.
Report Post »The individuals who are the base for Mr Paul need to explore his comments a great deal further and cease with the mob mentality of excuses to “vote for him because my friend is voting for him”
I think he would be reasonable and NOT DO ANYTHING the Constitution wouldn’t allow for, i think he could put together a good cabinet that also supports our Constitution, but dont be dismissive to the comments he has made and his stance on the items which would diqualify him otherwise. And if you people think Iran is not going to forward a nuke express mail to Israel when they have it…you’e simply uninformed and choosing to stay that way. Iran and Islam is the opposition to all things and their goal is Americas destruction, and pacifying Iran is not an option.
Paul people refuse to use their intellect instead of emotions and that practice is exactly what elected Obama.
Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 5:20pmSimply remember what Glenn Beck showed us in regards to Progressives, they love playing the word game and they do so to move the masses in the direction they need them to go.
Each time Government intervenes whether in social policy, fiscal policy, or foreign policy it costs you money thru taxes we will pay to operate Government.
Conservatives are not reckless with their money and are very cautious about what they spend it on and that is why ‘CONSERVE’ is the root of the word Conservative.
The more a person decides to spend money the less conservative they are and the more Liberal with money they are.
Apply that to Government: the more Government (tax dollars) the more “liberal” you are. The less Government (tax dollars) the more conservative you are.
Ron Paul is clearly the most Conservative hands down.
According to Dick, the more you spend (more Government) the more conservative you are and shows the evil manipulating tricks both Dick and Fox are playing with you. Both are trying to Progress you past what a true Conservative really is.
I encourage you all to simply think about it with your own money. Are you conservative by freely blowing all your money or saving it….
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 5:35pmkeep trying dick.
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 5:52pm@ PlowMan – Stop saying Paul is the bad guy trying to vote third party. He is the front runner, why would he run third party. We are worried that you neo-cons will run the third party. It’s the total opposite. Trump has been saying hes going to run third party. Its clear that you neo-cons are going to Obama re-elected, so stop throwing the opposite at us when its not true.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 6:09pm@Luke611,
“He has spoken on the issue to take the Amsterdam apporoach with legalizing certian drugs, he debates legalizing “coke” and pot will reduce crime on the border and migrant states.”
Ron Paul is right about this.
See here.
Defending the Undefendable (Chapter 4: The Drug Pusher) by Walter Block
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vT1WgD1Ujh8
And here.
Defending the Undefendable (Chapter 5: The Drug Addict) by Walter Block
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEZnnP3scLU
harv1961
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 6:49pmThe Republican talking heads are running scared. Dr. Paul is everything bad even worse than the President. If we keep doing the same thing and expecting different results we are truly insane. The only candidate who will make government smaller is Dr. Paul.
Report Post »Jackers
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 7:42pmFOX News is a disgrace! Fair and Balanced? I don’t think so… More like Unfair and Biased…
FOX News completely ignored Ron Paul all year. In spite of this, Paul’s message started to resonate as more and more Americans started listening to and appreciating what he had to say.
Now, FOX News has become so desperate that they’ll say literally anything to try and marginalize Paul… Talk about outright slander. Neo-Cons like Dick Morris, Karl Rove and most of the hacks on FOX News are starting to look like fools.
No wonder FOX News lost 8 percent of its viewership this past year… The “mainstream” media is no longer to be trusted.. Talk Radio and the Internet is where we can get the real news.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 8:01pm@SUSIE Sorry Susie…Ron Paul wants nothing to do with the UN..It’s all of the other candidates that want to continue relations with them..Ron Paul wants to bring our Miltary home and build it here..
Report Post »Luke611
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:15pmA Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
I MOST CERTAINLY agree with the initial elements of the link… 1) drug addicts reach a position where their ability to resist is disable. 2) Drug pushers are the greatest threat to the continuation of illegal drug sales and the deterioration of effected factions of American society.
Needless to say, the extended offering of this thesis is without merit for reason to legalize.Think about this:
The issue here is consequences of judgment as it pertains to the crime.
Pushers are effectively murderers (someone dies everyday as a result of their work)
…so lets take violent criminals i.e., murderers, violent rapist, pedophilia and drug pushers and place them in prison TOGETHER separately from white collar criminals. We start with 100 convicts, give them every conceivable freeby necessary to enjoy life….and remove ALL THE PRISON GUARDS. Prisoners will enact judgment upon themselves. Each month when the population drops below 50, we restock.
Report Post »the same effect here would be equal to the movie MINORITY REPORT….violent crime would almost cease,….drugs sales would plumment. Prisoners do the same with pushers what they do with pediphiles and rapist,… every prisoner that has ever done drugs knows who got them started and why they are in prison and they enact revenage.
So the issue isn’t legalizing drugs, its enacting punishment that reduces the behavior. This could be an reality TV show that actually works for America
Vechorik
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:37pmRon Paul is an honest, humble, Christian man. This video is about the early 1970′s and a black man is telling his story. I cried big-time first time I watched this.
http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-washington-dc/checkmate-video?fb_comment_id=fbc_10150467405817886_20364493_10150467707422886#f240dc0fa054e96
Report Post »Luke611
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:39pmMr Paul has some ideas that are SPOT on….but his foreign policy arguments are akin to Prime Minister Chamberlains appeasement of Hitler. His position to legalize drugs in Amsterdam as significantly reduced grad rates, employment for under 30, spiked unwed prenancies, increased larceny, vandalism violent crimes SINCE the adaption,… they maintain the law for what it does for tourism which IS the only business of Amsterdam– otherwise they have no GNP.
As I said before, he will NOT DO ANYTHING the Constitution wouldn’t allow– I trust him at his word there….but there are some serious holes in this man’s armor that must be measured. I come from Texas…Ron Paul has been around awhile and has many years of inconsistancy to be observed.
Report Post »He has authored clauses to bills and then reversed his vote when a majority was in effect for its passing to claim he is against “pork”….this man knows how to two-step just as well as Gov Perry.
BLarocca
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:52pmDick Morris has never been a huge fan of Ron Paul, just a huge pain in the *** . He is so out of touch with reality that he has to work for Fox News.
Report Post »Byzantine_Catholic
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 11:38pmOk you crazy war mongering Republicans.. Why do you want to go to WAR w. IRAN over Nukes ( remember Iraq and WMD).. But NOT GO to WAR w. North Korea over Nukes?
Vote RON PAUL for a SANE foreign policy
Report Post »privacyina9m80
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 11:50pm@Patrick Henry II
We have way too much on Obama. I mean, it’s not even fun anymore. It’s just sad.
Undeclared wars for Libyan oil; TARP used to bail out auto companies for union supporters; TARP in general; stimulus programs that spent millions of dollars in administrative fees to weatherize 3 homes; stimulus being used to reward union supporters; positive comments about Mao; Van Jones; Solyndra; 3 or 4 other stories exactly the same as Solyndra; Gibson Guitar; Jeremiah Wright; Bill Ayers; Tony Rezko; trying to buy the IL Senate seat; teleprompters; bowing to inbred royalty; apologizing for America; playing hardball with Israel for no good reason; insulting our allies with narcissistic gifts; Obamacare; the individual mandate; rationing; “clinging to guns” rhetoric; federal student lending takeover; signing NDAA; civilian trials for foreign terror suspects (not citizens); SOPA; FAST AND FURIOUS (aka treason)…
My head hurts. It’s too much.
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 1:15amCultist , cultist meaning , definition of cultist , what is cultist – 1 (noun) cultist a member of a religious cult 2 (noun) cultist a member of an unorthodox cult who generally lives outside of conventional society under the direction of a charismatic leader.
Report Post »TAXEVERYONE
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 9:16amWhy are the Paul supporters so insulting to everyone who has a different view? Must get that from their leader.
Report Post »DrFrost
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 6:14pm@BYZANTINE
I consider myself a libertarian, not a republican, but I’ll attempt to answer your question. The government of Iran has a long history of stating that they are going to destroy us and destroy Israel, our ally. North Korea has certainly made some troubling statements…. but nothing like Iran. Iran also has a history of funding terrorism and arming/funding those attacking us (especially in Iraq). There’s evidence they are currently funding terrorists to attack us on our own soil. This is not true for North Korea. Iran sits in the middle east, a very volatile region. If Iran gets nukes, Saudi Arabia arguably needs to have them, as does Iraq. It adds to the instability of a region that is already very unstable (don’t forget they border Pakistan). Again, this is not true for N. Korea which is bordered by China and South Korea with Japan to the east.
Also, attacking N. Korea would almost certainly affect our relationship with China… and not in a good way. How would we feel if China invaded Mexico to keep them from developing nukes?
I could go on but, in short, the situation with N. Korea is very different than the situation with Iran.
Should we go to war with Iran to keep them from getting nukes? The answer really depends on whether you take them at their word or not. What if they’re telling the truth? What if they really are going to use them on us? If that is given as a premise, do you think we should launch a preemptive strike to preve
Report Post »S G Applebee
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:53amIf by “liberal”, Dick Morris means “the only candidate to understand and demand the government FOLLOW the principles set down in The Declaration of Independence and The Constitution”, then yes, Ron Paul is a “liberal”.
Report Post »Dan_o
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 10:55amGlad to see nobody is fooled by this tripe. Facts tell the story, not soundbites. I don‘t think there’s anyone who’s “served” in the past 2 decades who cares about the facts. The only thing they care about is convincing us of broad ideologies that, in the end, only serve the government.
Well, no longer! Not one more year! We the people of the United States will not serve at your good pleasure anymore! You all better get your resumes ready in D.C.!
Report Post »Jim AZ
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 9:12pmHey, DICK!
Report Post »I always figured you were still on the payroll of the Billary machine.
What precise mechanism allowed zer0 to seize it’s reigns?
football lady
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:16amDon’t agree with Dick Morris on this but I still will NOT vote for Ron Paul based on his foreign policy only. I only know who I will not vote for at this point and that person is Ron Paul. If it comes to Ron Paul and Obama, then and only then would I vote for Ron Paul. Ron Paul being the nominee I believe will be a cold day in Hell.
Report Post »Timothy_Reid
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:25amSo if I hear you right then following the founding fathers ideas on foreign policy is a bad thing?
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:26amFollowing the Constitutionality of wars a problem for you? Nation building and wasted money is OK? Being the worlds’ police force fine with you? Invading soviern nations and killing their leaders OK too?
Why not let the warmongers of the world fight it out and if they want some @hit from us we then kick them back to the stone age? Leave the Muslims alone and they will kill each other off. And we dont need their oil either. we have PLENTY here!
Report Post »boltach
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:26amlook up the definition of non-interventionist. Also, why do you think Ron Paul receives so much financial support from active military. In addition, if you are all gun ho about starting a war with Iran or any other Islamic nation – join the military and fight on the front lines.
Report Post »KTsayz
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:27amGuess you’re looking forward to watching the games at your nearest FEMA camp, then, eh?
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:28amSo what you’ve just said is that you value an unconstitutional militaristic war stance national security state posture, more than you value small and Constitutionally restricted government.
We’re broke. Don’t you (and others) get it yet? We’re not just broke in regards to adding new socialist programs, we’re completely broke. We cannot afford our own bills now, let alone sending money and military across the globe on a fully Woodrow Wilson inspired mission to “spread democracy to the world”. Broke. Nothing left to give. What’s hard to understand about this? Y’all seem to get it when it comes to the Left, but when your own pet unconstitutional programs are in the crosshairs suddenly it’s full stop, to hell with small government, to hell with restoring the Republic.
This nation is gone. The small minority of remaining classical liberals (libertarians in modern parlance) are sorely outnumbered. The progressives have won. Enjoy your police state.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:33amAnd Dick Morris is a fat douche bag, who is pretty much WRONG on every political prediction he ever made, and as far as Ron Paul and this iran bomb thing, i have one question that nobody seems to want to anwer… Why didnt Bush -Cheney handle this problem??? It seems it woulda been a lot easier 5 years ago…. Please, anybody, answer that… And remember one thing… Nations in complete bankruptsy and collapse dont have a foreign policy anyway!!! So dont you think maybe we should get our house here at home in shape first ???? Then worry about the rest of the third world turds ???
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:34amAnd you expect this individual who has been programmed by FOX News to engage in a debate with you? Seriously? lol
They have no facts or real understanding.. They are only following the suggestions coming from FOX and various other Media.
Report Post »Smittyflakes
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:41am@Football Lady
So you would get rid of Obama, just to vote in another big government progressive because they will continue down the same path of utilizing our military for the “greater good” of the World. It sounds like you won’t let go of your progressive roots. It may sound like isolationism, but why keep up with the idea that we should be telling everyone what to do. We have been leading the horse to the watering hole for the past 10 years in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Iraqis woud sip the water, and Afghanis don’t know what water is. Its pointless to send our Military in to Nation Build, because it makes people feel better about giving them a beatdown. I think your “I don’t like his foriegn policy” is an invalid argument and that you just want everything to stay the same. Well the same thing is starting to really suck. There will be a change and a big one soon. Which way to you want it to go Small Government or Big? Or you can keep sleeping right through it.
Report Post »Jezreel
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:44amFootball lady needs to be schooled and taught on the constitution and bill of rights instead of wasting your brain away on football. Foolish silly American women who listen to religious politics and do not realize that God will be the only one who can save Israel. Israel will not depend upon the strength of man to save her.
Report Post »machineGear
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:00amI hope you are currently petitioning your local US representative for the country to go to war with Iran. If not, your reasoning for -not- supporting a Liberty minded presidential candidate is puzzling.
Report Post »dimitrisokolov
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:18amRon Paul’s foreign policy is the right one. The US has been playing world policeman for 50 years now and our $700 billion military budget is bankrupting the country. What have we acheived? We supported a coup in 1953 that installed the Shah in Iran, which eventually led to the 1979 revolution. We supported Saddam Hussein in his war against Iran. We supported the Mujahadeen & Osama Bin Laden in their war against the Russians in Afghanistan. We supported Mubarak in Egypt. We support the completely corrupt Saudi regime where 17 of the 19 hijackers were from and the Wahabbis spew the most radical form of Islam. Our constant meddling in the middle east directly caused 9/11. Read Osama Bin Laden’s own words. He attacked us because we stationed troops in Saudia Arabia. If the Russians or China were bombing the US, invading our country and had bases in Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean, what do you think we would do? Would you just sit back and do what they say? We are doing the same thing to the middle east. We kill innocent people with nearly every drone strike. We spent over $1 trillion dollars invading and occupying Iraq and Afghanistan, for what? What have we gained? Nothing but dead US soldiers. Iraq is a disaster and we installed a corrupt Karzai in Afghanistan. The US foreign policy has to change and only Ron Paul will change it. Elect one of these other GOP idiots and you will get WW3.
Report Post »junior1971
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:36amI am not a robot! I am growing weary of being insulted by ignorant, archaic neo-bots! Some one show me where in the constitution does it state we will set up military bases all over the world and conquer foreign nations in our own self interest, aka oil? We are the U.S.A! Are we so dependent on foreign oil that we cannot find oil in our own hemisphere? North Korea, South American countries, China, the list goes on. Who should we invade next? Perhaps we should invade China first. Then just work our way until we force and then enforce freedom on the entire world! Our interference has given sharia a strong foothold in the arab region. Good job! Two years ago, so-called conservatives all seemed to agree that we must follow the constitution strictly and revert back to it’s principals, what the he!! has happened!!!?!?!?
Report Post »Shane74
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 1:57pmHey guys! Let’s NEVER leave Korea! Let’s never leave anywhere in the world! (Unless we’re tricked into leaving, like Iraq!) But hey! Let’s just keep sticking our soldiers, and our policies, where they don’t belong!
Also, can other nations PLEASE COME HERE? We sure like having the ability to dictate to others how things should work, so wouldn’t that be so awesome if like, China came and put a base here? I mean, to “keep the peace”, and maybe hand us notes on how to handle crisis?
Gosh golly, interventionism is so great!
Look at all that we get from it!
For example, we are lucky if we get 5 percent of the contracting jobs to rebuild the places we blew up in Iraq!
I can tell you right now, THAT MONEY IS WAY BETTER THAN THE MONEY WE WOULD HAVE SAVED IF WE HAD NOT ILLEGALLY, UNCONSTITUTIONALLY, WENT TO WAR!
God, so much good has come of it. Same with Korea!
All we’ve done is make good happy feelings with our friends around the world! It’s why they love us!
I can’t wait for us to send our young sons and daughters into places like Syria, and Iran! I mean, hey, we‘ve been told for 30 years that they’re going to have a nuke in maybe a year! Maybe that will finally happen next year!
And we all know THAT’S going to happen, because the same people who marched us, bravely, into Iraq were SOOOOO spot on!
Only good things have come from our interventionism!!!! 4 serious! It made us SO RICH, WE DON’T KNOW WHAT TO DO WITH ALL THE MONEY.
Good jo
Report Post »riverdog1
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 2:38pmmorris is a repblican hack. what do you expect.
Report Post »Shane74
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 3:29pmLet’s keep borrowing more money, like the 1.3 trillion Obama is about to get, so that we can fix other nations, while we can’t even afford our own programs!
I remember when Reagan said we need to make multiple shining cities on the hill!
Or the classic song lyrics “everywhere around the world, we’re bringing you America!”
Keep listening to the media. You know, the media that tells you to your face that YOU ARE DANGEROUS, tea partiers.
They suerly would not lie to us!
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 7:41pm@football lady – Too much Tv watching will put white fur all over Sheep.
Report Post »Naps
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 11:36pmWho in their right mind would care what Richard Cranium Morris has to say? This is the same guy that thinks every high school student should have mandatory urine screens and wants a global identification card(chip). This dude needs to stick to what he knows best. Being Bill O‘reilly’s personal fluffer. RON PAUL or None At All
Report Post »StanO360
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 2:45pmRon Paul is unelectable, he has an interpretation of the Constitution, not THE interpretation of the Constitution. He is a Libertatian not a Conservative in current nomenclature. He has loads of baggage that will make him easily demonized. On many issues he is at odds with a huge majority of Americans. Even on a presentation level, his appearance, voice etc, he comes off as odd (I understand this is not relevant, but it is at the ballot box).
Most conservatives would be much more comfortable with a Thomas Sowell style conservative (a strong Constitutionalist as well) rather than Rep. Paul.
Besides, much of being President is leadership and building consensus, I have no idea if Paul has these qualities and where and how he’s exercised them.
Report Post »GroundZero is Nuclear Demolition x3
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:15amThis speak enormously to dick morris’s credibility.
Report Post »Timothy_Reid
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:25amDid he really ever have any, lol?
Report Post »AZindependent
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:35amDick Morris is an insider who can’t stand the thought of Ron Paul disturbing the status quo. Morris likes the way things work (and he makes a lot of money off it). He is just another media whore worried about his street corner.
Report Post »KTsayz
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:35amROFL I agree. Fox has become unbearable to watch, too. It’s like Media Matters.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:50amThe Republican establishment is starting to freak out, as they should, the democrats and the republicans are two sides of the same corrupt coin…. We need someone who will rock the rotten apple cart… Dick Morris is an idiot, and so is John Boehner, a d all these wars, on, Terror, drugs, poverty, illiteracy, can u tell me which one of these we are actually winning??? And all you people so worried about Iran, when the true threat is the open southern border and our crushing DEBT!!!!
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:05amCredibility? One of Clinton’s closest advisors is now the voice of conservatism? The whole scenario is whacked.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:25amI ask again, if this Iranian bomb thing is the most important issue, then why didnt Bush Cheney handle it ???? Israel is armed to the teeth with nukes , they have proved in the past to be very capable of protecting their nation, But Bush Cheney, two of the biggest hawks ever, why didnt they handle it ???? And do you really think romney or gingrich are what , gonna take the oath of office and immediatley start bombing Iran ???? And is that what you want ? Another expensive and stupid war ??? We are broke… PERIOD
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:35amHey Paperboy, What if Iran blocks the Strait of Hormuz? It may well happen. Should we clear them out?
Report Post »GroundZero is Nuclear Demolition x3
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 3:12pmYA, we will just shoot down another airliner via the NAVY. Three is the charm right??
Report Post »foobear
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 5:28am>>This speak enormously to dick morris’s credibility.
Yeah.
He’s just repeating talking points against Ron Paul, some (most?) of which aren’t true.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:12amLet’s see Paul wants to slash the budget one trillion dollars immediately,a sure sign of a liberal.He wants to eliminate five departments,another sign of a liberal.He wants to end the fed,a private corporation that’s bankrupting us.It‘s funny we have all these ’wars’ the war on poverty war on drugs war on terrorism
Report Post »and it’s all BS. We do indeed have a war and it’s on the constitution,being waged by a Marxist in the white house aided by RINOS and fake conservatives,just keep voting for people who support the unpatriotic act and the NDAA and before too long you’ll have all the security you long for and no freedom or liberty.
Detroit paperboy
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:40amMorris is a Dick, and i for one think we should cut off foreign aid, bring our troops home from everyqhere, quit spending money on shrimps on treadmills, and cut the FEDERAL CRIMINAL GOVT. by 75%… Ron paul is nuts, and thats why i like him !!!!
Report Post »stoptheliesbho
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:40amfor like HALF a second, i had no idea you were being sarcastic about Paul being a liberal by cutting spending. and then i saw that it was YOU posting, and i caught the thick sarcasm immediately. LOVE IT!!
Report Post »MCDAVE
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 11:12amObamas war of economic destruction is being waged against us;middle class America…After three years of calling my representatives in congress I understand…none of them care about us! Ron Paul for reform and return to constitutional government..
Report Post »DirkPotters
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 3:07pmYes, you got it.
When will people learn what “rugged individualism” and “personal responsibility” means?
Just because I think the Federal government should get out of the business of drug enforcement, does not mean that I think drugs are good. Just because I think prostitution should be legalized, does not mean I think prostitution is good and I have never nor will I ever use the services of a prostitute. At least the Federal government could extract taxation from these things. Just because I think homosexuality is against the morals of many of the major religions, as well as an slap to the idea of evolution and survival of the fittest, does not mean that I want to kill a homosexual.
Just because Ron Paul says that we may have some responsibility with the 9/11 attacks does not make him a 9/11 Truther (that the US government either knew about the attacks were coming or that the US government was directly or indirectly involved). What reason did 19 Saudi Arabians have in hijacking 4 airplanes and sending 2 into the World Trade Center and 1 into the Pentagon? Was it our foreign policies over the last 30 years? What reasons did they have? Certainly those 19 Saudis had to have some reasons in their minds to do such a thing. Was it the nonsense that comes out of Hollywood and the boob-tube? Is that many consider the US to be a “Christian” nation? Is it the rap (hate it to call it “music”) that comes from this country and is heard around the world?
Report Post »Anarcho Capitalist
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:11amwar is peace
Report Post »freedom is slavery
ignorance is strength
welloddyfriggindah
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:22am…and hell is heaven.
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:31amThe filthy corrupt ruthless Big gov’t Statist War Mongering, Obama light Republican establishment is a little concerned. lol I finally learned yesterday that Ron Pauls was an anti-Semite, racist, didn’t support the military, desired to legalize heroin and cocain for youth, more liberal than Obama, and somebody on MSNBC said that he desired to execute all homosexuals. Yes! That was all said yesterday and I’m sure much more but I heard this with my own ears catching snippets here and there.
It’s simply mind boggling to behold. They don‘t won’t to release even an inch of their grip upon this gov’t! Republican establishment big gov’t as usual! Puke!
Report Post »FreeUsAll
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:52am@Anarcho Capitalist
Ahh, yes. Funny how so-called conservatives and many tea-partiers again espouse the lies being dished out to them. They woke up with the election of Obama, only to go right back to sleep.
Ron Paul 2012!
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:03amAll you people so concerned about Iran… Were you shocked and horrified that Bush Cheney didnt handle that little problem, Israel is armed to the teeth with nukes, let them handle it, we are broke and can no longer afford to police the world, even if we wanted to!!! Besides , while we have the brown shirts at the TSA doing cavity searches on granny, the southern border is wide open, have we lost our minds ? And Ron Paul knows, that by far, the biggest threat to our national security is our crushing debt….. And wake up, because the biggest threat to your liberty, freedom and way of life, is our very own CRIMINAL FEDERAL GOVERNMENT… NOT IRAN !!!
Report Post »Shane74
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 3:22pmhttp://www.unionleader.com/article/20111229/OPINION01/712299993
Lookie! The unions FEAR Paul.
Top down, bottom up, inside out.
Anti-pauls, how do you explain his 90 percent CONSERVATIVE VOTING RECORD?
Are you suddenly going to twist and contort yourselves to believe the unions?
Report Post »kaygee
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:11amwhoever wants war they will not support paul….
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:27amAnd the people who want us in perpetual war never fought in one or ever will.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 1:23amI say give Iran a nuke and a front row ticket to a Ron Pork Paul rally
Report Post »wisehiney
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:05amBlaze censors get ready.
Report Post »wheels
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:27amDick Dick Dick, can I call you Dick? Thank you “Mr” Morris…everyone knows that liberals dont live by or swear by our Constitution. Truth be told, if you were any more conservative than Dr Paul you would be an anarchist (as far right as you can go, y’know, the opposite of tyranny?). I’m not real sure why Fox News loves this flamboyant feminine tub-O-goo as much as they do, O’reilly & Hannity have this clown on almost every night, ridiculous. If I wasn’t already a Ron Paul supporter before, I would‘ve converted just to insure I wasn’t on the same page as this guy.
Report Post »mike623317
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:04amWhat absolute nonsense.
We’re borrowing almost half of what the Govt spends. Of course we need to cut spending, and drastically.
The money has run out. Our ability to borrow from the rest of the world is coming to an end.
Dick – You can not spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt. Ron is the most conservative of the candidates. A true, traditional, constitutional conservative.
1 trillion cuts in 1 year. Go Ron!
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:09amHe, and most of the armchair warriors on the Right, are absolutely miffed that somebody,anybody, doesn’t buy into the mechanistic, militaristic, constant warfare State. The Founders didn’t even believe in a standing army, so I have to ask myself, who resembles the founders more, the so called “conservatives” who cannot wait to play international policeman, or Ron Paul (and libertarians in general) who follow the doctrine layed out by Geo. Washington himself?
Report Post »Timothy_Reid
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:31amIt’s come to the point where we have interfered for so long in the affairs of others that it is inconceivable to most to not do so. We need Ron Paul in the White House, plain and simple. START to put things back to where they should be. He won’t be able to do it all, nor in only one term, but he will make a big enough difference to wake people up to the troubles that have been caused by straying so far from founding principles. IMHO
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:39amGOJ,
Report Post »True Conservatives don’t believe in standing armys,dictating and building other nations,we do believe that to secure peace one most prepare for war. People like Morris are one worlders like Carter,Bush sr. Clinton,Bush jr,and Obama fact is most presidents have been one Worlders progressives since Teddy. Each having their own belief systems on why one world is important. never the less
The progressives on both side of the isles hate Paul because he isn’t far left like they all are becoming. And the real proof is now Dick morris and his ilk are breaking out the race card. Claiming Paul is racist because he believes Israel should handle their own business. He also believes that as long as America has to borrow money to cover the budget deficit it shouldn’t be shelling out billions in foriegn aid. Paul is a true Conservative and Constitutionalist. The biggest problem with that is our forefathers never had the foresight to imagine a weapon that would level cities and lay lands to waste for decades. nor should they have. Pauls economics idea are great,most of his views on downsizing government are great. I do think gingrich is right about the courts and ideological judges appointed by politicians. Paul’s only weakness is lack of foresight and his belief that Islamist will not use nuclear weapons if they have them.
Timothy_Reid
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:52am@smith I respect your opinion and that you have put thought behind it. However I must disagree. The Founding Fathers may not have been able to predict the kind of weaponry that would be available but they predicdted people with incredible accuracy. Please remember that it was the christians who were the jihadists in the middle ages and did just as much damage as the weapons of today (percentage wise) would do. It simply took a little longer. There is nothing that people are thinking of today that has not been thought of before. The Founders knew this and put those policies into place because while technology may change, people don’t. The principles are as sound today as they ever were.
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:15amsmithclar3nc3: That’s a good post and good starting point for any intelligent conversation to begin.
I agree with everything you said however the tricky part comes in the how do we prevent them from acquiring a Nuke. Dr. Paul says use Diplomats. I agree. Will it work? Probably not but genuine diplomacy is the starting point. Don‘t say we’ve already tried that because we’ve not. If that doesn’t work then light sanctions with continued genuine diplomacy is the next step.
If that fails which it probably will, the next step would be is to convey in the strongest possible terms that if Iran ever decided to use a Nuke as an aggressor that their Nation will be annihilated. I see no other viable options.
War is not an option. I feel that American’s have become far too comfortable with War. War in which there are no costs to the average American. No one likes a bully and that is what America has become.
That’s one conversation. Another conversation I’d like to have is why do we choose to have as an ally a Nation with a plan raze American cities with Nuclear warheads? Don’t feign ignorance on the topic now. I’ve brought it up many times and it’s there for the world to see. It’s called the Samson option. Now even the Iranian President doesn’t have a plan to wipe out American cities does he? lol
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:36amBy FAR , the biggest most immediate , direct threat to your Freedom, Liberty, and way of life… Is your own CRIMINAL FEDERAL GOVERNMENT…. not IRAN . PERIOD
Report Post »Ron Paul Knows This….
smithclar3nc3
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 12:19pmTech 11,
Report Post »I too agree wars is not a desired option but it is however a foregone conclusion when your dealing witha country that still exist spiritually in the 12th century holding a 21st century WMD. It’s not a question of if, it’s question of when. I don’t believe that Dr. Paul can grasp the fact that he wouldn’t be dealing with a rational logical leader but rather a religious idelogical dictator.
However I like Dr. Paul believe that if we put the effort in building our defense an offense won’t be necessary. It’s not America that will taste the nuclear spear of an islamic califate. And you’re right We could use threats of annihilation for their action but what does annihilation mean to a matyr……success
It’s a global catch 22
smithclar3nc3
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 12:38pmAnd Tech 11,
Report Post »As for the Samson Option I put little stock in rumor or third person he said she said. I do know if Israel pulled something like that they would be living on an uninhabitable sheet glass in a manner of hours.
That being said history if not anything it has taught the Jews that surrender only leads to extermination. Now if all these leftist P.C. douches who cringe if anyone points out who the terrorist are and denies facts because it would shatter their little world could comprehend that we’ld be in better shape.
See you can state a Samson Option exist…I can prove an Islamic threat is real….lol gofas
Veritas Libertas
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 3:49pmYou can check this video out on the political spectrum. Anyone that doesn’t understand the left v. right paradigm or why the United States is a Republic not a Democracy (and what that devolves to) can get a quick understanding.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8I9pLmuyyA&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 8:11amVeritas libertas,
Report Post »That‘s a video every school kids should see it’s simple and to the point. AND 1000% CORRECT.
JustPeachy
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:03amWow–I’m surprised he feels THAT strongly or that way about Ron Paul. IMO, Ron has some conservative economic viewpoints, but is VERY off on foreign policy as well as other ideas–and I agree that THOSE Paul viewpoints are NOT Conservative.
To me, Paul seems to be a mix of conservatism and liberalism, disguised as “freedom-loving“ and ”libertarianism.” He’s truly difficult to define politicially, IMO. He seems to be the most different from any of the other candidates. His supporters see that in a positive way while those who see his off ideas for what they are (a bit whacko) see this “difference” in a most negative way.
Again, I‘m surprised at Morris’ rather strong remarks and reaction to Ron Paul. I know he liked Herman Cain while recently giving good words about Gingrich and has said he’ll be working with Cain on his “outside political ventures.” I like Morris, but I don’t quite “get” him. But I guess like the rest of us, he’s entitled to his opinions!
Report Post »Byzantine_Catholic
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:30amWhat exactly do you mean by Liberal views of Dr. Paul?.. Most of his social positions (same sex marriage, drug laws, etc) are for the states to decide what is best for them.. Supporting States Rights — Hardly conservative right?
For an “Isolationist” ( Really non-interventionist) policy .. Should be bail out the EU banks? – a case could be made that the collapse of the euro would cause a economic threat to the US ..
Nanner-SW
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:35amEveryone defines liberal and conservative differently. For some indeviduals, conservatives are freedom and consequences focused, while liberals are security and benefits focused. This views also popular, conservatives are security and consequences focused and liberals are freedom and benefits focused. In the latter senerio Ron Paul is very liberal.
Report Post »GERATMO
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:02amITs defined as Libertarian and it is not Liberal. Besides his foreighn policy, I dont see anything that is liberal because liberals dont believe in the Constitution.
Report Post »dnewton
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 11:01amI would like to hear from Ron Paul how isolationism helped the US in the past. The War of 1812 springs to mind as well as the dust up in the Mediterranean with Muslims demanding taxes and taking hostages right after we became America. Some people think that isolationism only makes things worse because when the dogs of war are turned loose, a state of unpreparedness increases casualties on both sides. Pacifism caused Europe to ignore Germany rearming. Being neutral involves not being worth the trouble to attack or being able to avoid coercion into alignment with one of the belligerents. If the Sunnis offer us oil, what are we going to do? We already aligned with the Sunni against the Shiite during the Iran Iraq war. I doubt that we could mobilize quickly even to save the country if we needed to rearm. We would have to wade through our own Fifth Column of eco-freaks and peaceniks at home just to get the energy and build the infrastructure. In a nuclear world, that time to build is shorter if not impractical. If Israel attacks all of its surrounding belligerents, the air will be so full of Plutonium, Strontium and other radioactive particles, it will seem silly to think that we had no dog in that fight.
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 5:53pmIf wanted a liberal, I would would for Obama. Name one thing how he is liberal? You can’t.
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 5:57pmIf I wanted some one Liberal,I would vote for Obama dummy
Report Post »privacyina9m80
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 12:17amNo. The definitions of liberal and conservative are NOT something that each person defines for himself. They have REAL, CONCRETE meaning. Liberals are collectivist and want a large, centralized government with lots of authority. Conservatives are individualistic and self-reliant, and want as little government as possible.
Report Post »DirkPotters
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 3:23pmInstead of letting the Neo-Conservatives on Fox News and the Liberals on the other channels define “Libertarian”, why don’t you go to the source. There is a “Libertarian Party”. http://www.lp.org/
There is only one true Libertarian on the news channels that I am aware of: he is Judge Andrew Napolitano who has a show on Fox Business News called “Freedom Watch”. He openly supports Ron Paul.
Bachmann lies when she says she is a “Constitutional” Conservative. She supported the Patriot Act which trampled heavily on the Constitution.
Only Ron Paul supports and defends the Constitution of the United States in all respects. The rest say they do, but they lie.
Report Post »PPMStudios
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:02amIn the voice of Sam Kinison in Back to School…. “Is she right? I know that’s the popular version of what went on there….”
Report Post »noland
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:01am@jlGunner, give em time and don”t you dare speak of any allies america has left, or they will take off your head, and take out knee-caps.
Report Post »NickDeringer
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:00amWell if Dick Morris says it, it must be true. Where have you been, buddy? We’ve been saying Ron Paul is nuts for months.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:09amYou mean the Dick Morris that was a Clinton Croney? You mean the Dick Morris that was talking to Bill Clinton on the phone while he was getting a BJ and bragging about it? You mean the progressive dumba@@ that appears on FOX to sell his books? That Dick Morris? Oh yea, I believe him…He should know liberal…He is one!
Ron Paul is no more a Liberal than the FOUNDERS OF THIS NATION!
Report Post »When is freedom. personal responsibility, liberty and the Constitution liberal? Wake up fool!
Detroit paperboy
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:11amAnd nutty times call for a nut…
Report Post »JLGunner
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 11:41amRon Paul’s been nuts for years.
Report Post »chewfatlip
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 1:07pmAnd getting more and more senile before our eyes
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 8:59amPaul is very liberal about some things…and there is nothing wrong with that. Libertarians believe in personal freedom and no government oversight. Sometimes this pendulum swings too far in the other direction. Fine…
Morris is not that bright and has been wrong time and time again. He seems like a nice guy…albeit somewhat a fool.
Paul has had me on board more than once only to open his mouth about one issue or another and turn me back off. He is a flaming nut…but may be the best nut we got…I believe he has lost my vote but that does not really matter.
The fact is this is all irrelevant. Paul is going nowhere. He has a rabid fanbase that think they speak for everyone, but he is not a serious contender. The paulbots can twist polls and call everyone else neocons but it is just a wasted effort.
I refuse to get fired up over this election, it does not matter anyway. I will vote for the Republican candidate and hope they are at least better than Obama. To do anything else will ensure an Obama win. Anyone who tries to tell you otherwise has no clue about how this system really works. Freedom? No…Not here…not anymore…
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:06amVoting “anybody but Insert Name Here” is the attitude that has gotten us to where we’re at today. It’s a fine little logical trap that the progressives have set for us, and by golly, the majority of people fall for it time and time again. Remember that prior to the rise of the progressive way of thinking (or not thinking, if you like), the overwhelming majority of Americans were politically “classical liberal” which we now call “libertarian”.
They’ve done a real number on us, and I don’t think the disease can be cured now, without a total collapse of the system. I’m not advocating a total collapse, mind you, I‘m just saying that the propaganda has run so deep into our national psyche that it’s a wonder that there are any “classical liberals” remaining at all.
Vote for “anybody but Insert Name Here” if you wish, I’m going to vote my values, beliefs and conscious, as I always do. Nobody owns my vote or my volition, so there’s no way to claim that “if you don‘t you’re electing somebody else”, my vote is mine and mine alone.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:20amSuit yourself GOJ, but you are smart enough to understand that the contest is between the D and the R. That is the game. You may not like the rules but there it is. If you do not want D to win again then the ONLY choice is to vote R. If a 3rd party splits the vote then D is going yo win. Period. Your choice…Your America…
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:31amNo, the contest is not between R and D. The contest is between progressives and libertarians (at a philosophy level). Between full out statism on one side, and classical liberalism on the other.
D and R these days means Socialist Party A and Socialist Party B.
W. Wilson sure has strong influence here, when it comes to some things. Sad.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:46amI do not disagree. So what are you going to do about it? You are looking at a ballot (provided you take the time to vote) with two, maybe three names on it. It may have others but it boils down to three at best. The third is a wasted vote, you may feel good that you checked that box, but you basically threw away the time it took to drive to the polling place. So what does that leave you? D or R. Period. I don’t give a flying F about any philosophy, morals, beliefs, or rhetoric. I don’t care about how it “should” be. This is life. This is how it is. Cast your vote. If you vote third party you give D a win. It really is the lesser evil. Chocolate or vanilla…Rocky Road is simply not on the menu.
You want to change it? Concentrate on congress. The problem is…America is full of idiots who know nothing about current affairs or politics and that are voting either D or R based on some misplaced loyalty. You cannot win.
Vote your conscience in the primary, but in the general election you better think long and hard about the results before you vote anything but R. Because the two choices are R or D.
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:56am” I don’t give a flying F about any philosophy, morals, beliefs,”
And this is what has brought this nation to its knees, because ultimately “reality” is exactly this for most people. Y‘all get the world you’re creating that has no philosophy, morals or sound beliefs.
My vote is never thrown away, it’s always carefully researched (as much as possible) and reflects, as much as possible, my beliefs and values. A thrown away vote would be to vote without regards to ” philosophy, morals, beliefs,”.
My vote doesn‘t belong to you or the D’s. Sorry. If you want my vote, then offer a candidate worthy of it, otherwise, the reason that Obama (or anybody you oppose) wins, is fully on you (your party I mean, not you personally).
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:42amWhich is precisely what most libertarians lack; a sense of reality.
I did not say I do not have a philosophy, ideals, beliefs, etc…But our government has always been about compromise. Even during the first Continental Congress. You can’t just pick up your marbles and go home.
BTW, I never asked for your vote and I do not consider myself a Republican, though I tend to lean more in that direction. You can think of me as a Libertarian with a sense of reality, I am probably more conservative Christian than anything else though, ie; abortion is murder and the government certainly has the right to outlaw it. You vote how you like, that is one of your remaining freedoms. I merely point out what the results will be. If you choose to be blind to reality then it is your problem, but please, do not complain about Obama during the next four years. It will have been you and the other libertarian paulbots that put him there by refusing to vote for anyone except Paul. Like it or not, the world will march on no matter who is in office.
Report Post »MidWestMom
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:50amI see valid points in both of your arguments. Although I’ve always tried to educate myself on candidates, issues etc, I‘m sure I don’t understand all the fine nuances of today’s politics. With the mess our political system is these days, I wonder if anyone can. I will vote my values (always have) but at this point I feel I’m in a damned if you do, damned if you don’t situation.
Turning 18 and knowing I could now vote was a very exciting thing for me. From the beginning I believed casting my vote (at any level) was a great privilege and also a great responsibility. And I’ve raised my children to believe the same. I‘ve made good choices and bad choices but I’ve always tried to cast an informed vote. Sadly, in the big picture I don’t think my vote really matters anymore. The system is too corrupt, too tainted & too far gone. But at least I can look myself in the mirror and know that I tried to do my best & didn’t abandon my responsibility.
Ghost, I agree that the only chance to fix the system is a total collapse and a careful constitutional rebuild. That scenario is both appealing and terrifying.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:57ammidwestmom writes:
“Ghost, I agree that the only chance to fix the system is a total collapse and a careful constitutional rebuild. That scenario is both appealing and terrifying.”
————————————————————
I think all three of us can agree to this.
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 11:01amI’m sorry Troll, but anybody that wants my vote has to earn it. If they don’t earn my vote, then that’s their fault, not mine, as I am certainly not changing my values on the fly in order to trick anybody, they’re pretty rock solid and stable. That’s the reality. I seriously doubt that the Revolutionary War was an act of compromise, by the way. :)
@Mom
This, and other threads not even related to Paul, really worry me. It’s as if everybody can see the splinter in the eyes of others, but are totally blind to the plank in their own eye. Guess there’s a reason that analogy is in the Bible, eh? :)
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 11:21amAnd if no one earns it Ghost?
That is the position I once again find myself in. No different than McCain or Obama.
What should I do? Write in a candidate? Not vote?
Listen, I understand what you are saying brother, I really do. I am not the enemy here. The system is rigged, you cannot beat it. If Sarah Palin would run on a third party ticket I would vote for her in a second and the hell with what anyone else thought. If you feel that way about Paul…and he runs third party…or any other third party candidate…then I understand.
Personally…I want Obama out and I am voting to that effect. Even if I have to vote McCain again…
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 11:33am@Troll
I know we’re on the same side.
I’ve always found candidates that earn my vote, though most of the time they’re not in either “approved” big party. It could happen that we end up with None of the Above from every party/candidate, I really don‘t know what I’d do at that point, probably not pull the lever for anybody and only vote on whatever ballot issues were on the slate. Kind of a far hypothetical question though, as of yet it hasn’t occured. Ideally I’d *love* a default on every office ballot that said “None of the Above” that would force a new election with new candidates if “NOTA” won the election. Dreams, I know.
Report Post »MidWestMom
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 11:55am@Ghost
— This, and other threads not even related to Paul, really worry me. It’s as if everybody can see the splinter in the eyes of others, but are totally blind to the plank in their own eye. Guess there’s a reason that analogy is in the Bible, eh? :) —
I’m confused by this. Are you stating I have a plank in my eye that I‘m blind to or are you making a general statement about those who aren’t attempting to see the entire situation? Not taking offense just trying to understand your statement. Long night, no sleep. :)
Even though I’m disgusted and somewhat depressed about the big picture, I will continue to vote. At this point I’m undecided. Still looking at all the choices.
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 12:28pm@Mom
No, wasn’t directed at you, rather, at those who scream for “small government” except for their own pet projects.
Report Post »MidWestMom
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 1:37pmGhost – agree completely. And thanks for the explanation…long night, no sleep tends to leave me a bit “dense”. LOL
Report Post »macpappy
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 6:01pmThat hits it on the head TT, never better said. I have been on board with Paul also, just to have him blow me away with some silly statement or the other. I will vote my pick in the primary and vote for whoever wins…..as you say, hoping he is better than Obama.
Report Post »DirkPotters
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 3:33pmWhat you seem to forget is that if Ron Paul goes nowhere, most of us that support him will be staying home on Election Day in November 2012. That means, Obama will win.
I am willing to watch the country disintegrate into failure so that we can rebuild it. Sometimes it is better to start all over again and rebuild the country rather than continue to replace band-aids on a festering wound.
Report Post »kralspaces
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 8:59amDick Morris is a neocon from the Karl Rove blood line. War, Baby, War.
Report Post »drago
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:28am@kralspaces aka encinom
Report Post »Define neo-con, without copy and pasting from wiki…….i’ll wait…….
Vechorik
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:04amWhy? Can’t you read?
Here’s a VIDEO definition and names!
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAl5JhMQ-8s
kralspaces
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:34amEisenhower said it best: Military Industrial Complex
Report Post »kralspaces
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:44amV, good fine. Missed that video when I researched Paul’s policies. He has my vote mostly because I’m done with the neo-cons and endless, useless wars. I did my tour in Viet Nam… what a waste.
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 11:02amKralspaces,
Here is the ORIGINAL untouched version of that video…. This is who they believe the NeoCons are.
http://youtu.be/orTsSboJSFU
The Founding Fathers Were Not Liberatrians – they Were Conservatives!
The “Libetarians” are not Conservatives – They are Neoliberals
Ron Paul and the Neoliberal Reeducation Campaign
http://spectator.org/archives/2011/08/23/ron-paul-and-the-neoliberal-re
Not for those with short attention spans,stoned on heroin or doin the local prostitute!
Report Post »Crazy Times
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 8:58amYep… true that
Gretin Berlin would support his Israel stance.
Don’t know who she is? then look her up. (hint free gaza)
but I’m sure many Paulies know her already.
To all the ron pauls right wing supporters, congratulations, you are swimming with the sharks.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:14amAt least i am not swimming with the stupid like you are.
Rom Paul KNOWS Israel can take care of herself. We need to stop meddling and let them whip the crap out of the Muslims who want to destroy her. But we have stood in the way for too long now. So long in fact, that you have been brainwashed to the idea that Israel actually needs us to protect her. They do NOT!
Report Post »Crazy Times
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:53amYou made my point exactly.. the FIRST thing you do is ATTACK.
this website is right leaning… but you all take it around full circle to the left where you attack and smear, and attack religion, the military, the converatives, everything the left DOES….
and what kind of pic is that? a phoney plastic Soldier saltuting what? a phoney country. why don’t you start believing in something real? and dont tell me you are a vetran who “really cares and is considered about the direction our country is going and only the intelligent good Dr can bring us up from our fallen self” < freakin collective ideas….
If you were serious about the issues you would be serious in your post.
go back to media matters.
Report Post »Crazy Times
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:00am“they have nukes!” < of course you would be more than happy to see them use them on those poor poor poor palentinian people there who the jews are occupying their country?
ALL YOU Paulies out there, reply to ME!
just anwer if you agree or disagree with the statement i just made!, no jokes, no attacks, just answers FROM YOU.. i dought anyone will take me up on my offer.
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:35amHi Krazy
When did it become America’s constitutional business to stop other nations from acting or not acting (in a context where America is not being attacked)?
It hasn’t.
There’s your reply. Slainte.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:52amCrazy…I am a veteran. I fought so you could put out your stupid comments…You have the right to remain stupid. You have no clue to what the Constitution means. It would suck to be you.
Report Post »Shane74
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 2:53pmCrazy- I am a conservative. Stop trying to believe that because I don’t want endless war, that I’m a liberal.
Why don’t you show me where and when the constitution, or the founders of this nation, stated that our national goals should be driven by spending money to DEFEND OTHER NATIONS BORDERS?
Why is it that we can’t defend our own borders, but you’re gung-ho to defend other nation’s borders?
If you want to be safe, how about we stop spreading our forces film-thin, and bring them to where they would keep US safe?
How has all that interventionism worked out? Is the world better, or worse than it was? Worse you say? Strange.
Well, let’s just keep on the same track that brought us a worse world, and keep promising ourselves it’ll work out next time.
Next up: Syria! (It’ll work out this time! And we’ll have MORE FRIENDS!)
Report Post »OperationNorthwoods
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 8:56amDidn’t Dick Morris write a whole book about how Hillary was going to win the presidency? Sorry Dick you’re wrong again.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:21amDick put his foot in his mouth on this one.
Report Post »kralspaces
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 8:56amDick Morris is a neocon of the Karl Rove blood line. War, Baby, War.
Report Post »LibertarianLauren
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 8:55amFox News is really showing their true colors this election.
Many Americans are realizing that politics (as it affects our daily lives) should be more about BIG vs. SMALL as apposed to LEFT vs. RIGHT.
Fox News is obviously for big government… as long as they (Repub.’s) can run it.
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:11amYep. The Constitution only matters when it’s used against the Left. The Right, just like the Left, tends to shred it and stomp on it when it serves their purposes to do so. Welcome to Progressive Indoctrination Year 100.
Report Post »DirkPotters
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 3:37pmYou are absolutely right. No doubts about what you wrote. Sad isn’t it?
Report Post »The only fox news show I watch religiously is “Freedom Watch”
MrMagoo
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 8:54amIs he still sucking toes?…………..
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:21amMaybe but he didn’t send out a racist newsletter for 10yrs…..
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:30amSpeaking of Dr. Paul and racist newsletters:
See what this black man says that knew Dr. Paul in the early ’70s:
Report Post »http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-washington-dc/checkmate-video
Babeuf
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 11:08amI wonder how that same black man would feel knowing that the Good Doctor Paul does not endorse H.Res. 676. You know….. the ‘64 Civil Rights Act!
“Congress hailed the 40th anniversary of the 1964 Act. Only the Ron Paul dissented.”
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 12:31pm@Babeuf
Seems to me that any thinking person would find intrusions into the peaceful market wrong.
All of your posts have a decidedly leftist bent to them. Interesting.
Report Post »Tri-ox
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 8:54amTrue.
Report Post »ThePostman
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 8:49amI see nothing liberal here:
http://www.ontheissues.org/Ron_Paul.htm
Of course, all the above link is, is nothing more than a comprehensive record of every vote he ever cast.
Ron Paul hits the nail on the head on almost every single issue that a Beckian or a Tea Partier stands for. What’s not to like? That he doesn’t want to invade Iran? Do you really thing Obama or any of the republican clones of Obama will invade Iran? Of course not. The Israelis will bomb the hell out of them while we idly stand by. Just as we have done for 50 years now. The other guys talk the talk, but NEVER walk the walk? Don’t believe me? “North Korea”.
Why does Dick Morris insist on pitting this contest of one of left versus right when the real battle being waged is populism versus libertarianism?
Report Post »aznetman
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:43amAmen
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 8:49amI find Paul very liberal pertaining to drug legalization; ignorant in foreign policy–if not radical. BUT, if were to be (I don’t see it happening) the GOP nominee, he would have my vote. Morris needs to clarify if Obama would be better than Paul. I think not as the GOP electorate would rein in Doc Paul to be sure.
Report Post »Fella
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:14amCome on, the drug legalization issue is such a red herring. Besides, I thought the racist comic books were your sole reason for not supporting him.
I would be interested to hear your thoughts on how legalization has impacted your little corner of Colorado. I have an fairly conservative uncle living in Denver that said it seems to be working out fairly well. He’s come around a bit from where he initially stood on the issue, so not sure what to make of it. But I was amazed the last time I went there all the billboards and advertising for pot.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:20amHe does not believe in LEGALIZING drugs. That is total crap. He believes we need to allow people to do what they want to do and stop the ungodly spending on the war on drugs. Allow people to do what the hell they want to do behind closed doors. If they hurt children, we have laws against that. Personal freedom to live the life you want to live witout government control. If you want to screw up you life, so be it.
It would also open up the drug manufacturers to create new drugs to save lives as rthe FDA would be gone. FDA regulations have killed more people than it ever will save.
You need to wake up man.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:41amyeah, there are green crosses all over the place for folks to get their pot for their hangnails and such. My main concern is the stance Doc Paul has on Iran and other foreign matters. I don’t care for the newsletters I have read that apparently he signed his name to. That said, I WILL VOTE FOR ANY GOP NOMINEE SO AS TO BEAT OBAMA. None of the candidates give me too much hope, but we gotta start somewhere–gotta clean the house before we paint and lay new carpet.
Report Post »KTsayz
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:42am10th Amendment
Report Post »Read it and get educated.
smithclar3nc3
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:59amFDA regulations have killed more people than it ever will save.
Report Post »Exactly evertime I see one of the those class action lawsuit ads about so drug that has killed or injuried people I wonder why the company is being sued when it was the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FDA that approved the drug in the first place.
GhostOfJefferson
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 11:05am@Patton
Actually, since Beck employees people to scour the comments and remove comments that violate the site’s TOS, in fact you can place the blame on him IF you followed the reasoning of the person I was addressing. I do not follow that reasoning, ergo, I don’t actually blame Beck, I was simply pointing out what was going on.
Further, I didn’t only point out the comments area on the Blaze, I also mentioned articles posted by Blaze reporters. Again though, only as a counter point to show how collective guilt works.
Report Post »MCDAVE
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 11:47amHonestly his stand on drugs bothers me too.. but making anything illegal fuels the money machine for organized crime We raised our three children without the drug problem;because of parental guidance and christian values…the drugs are always available..Nancy Reagan had it right ;educate the children;that’s how you change things
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 12:38pmI thought Paul just wants the federal government out of the war on drugs and let the states decide for themselves. This is how we did it for the 1st 160 years. Alcohol is regulated county by county in some places, I suppose that’s what the people in the county think is best for them. God forbid we have the government closer to the people for the people. Who are these people that are always telling everybody what’s best for them. For Pete’s sake I cant even go to the store without worrying about wearing my seatbelt, it could cost me $100.00 and a record to boot. Enough is enough, I want my Freedom and Liberty back. And if that means I’m Nuts, then so be it.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 2:33pmMorris spreads lies re: drugs, porn, prostitution
Report Post »The Republican National Committee pulled a dirty trick on Paul. According to the Times, Paul was running for Congress against fellow Republican Greg Laughlin, whom he eventually defeated in a runoff. During the campaign, an Austin marketing company called people and asked respondents who favored Paul if they would still support him knowing that he was in favor of legalizing drugs, pornography and prostitution. The real truth, the Times noted, was this: “Dr. Paul said he only favored repeal of Federal laws on drugs, pornography and prostitution, leaving states to prohibit them.”
Jenny Lind
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 8:49amSorry Paulites, I agree-you are being blinded, and I feel sorry for you. This last 24 hours convinced me, NO PAUL.
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:15amOh noooes, we’re all fools for not supporting unconstitutional invasions of other countries and wanting a constant National Security State replete with TSA and the unconstitutional Patriot Act, oh nooooes.
Ok, thanks.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:42amGHOSTOFJEFFERSON do you support the 10yrs that Paul printed racist filth in his newsletters?
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:46amPoor misguided Jenny,just vote for a RINO he’ll keep you safe and strip you of all your freedom and liberty,it’ll just take a little longer than our Marxist president.
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:52am@Republicorp
Using that standard, then Glenn Beck is a racist. This is his site after all, and he allows lots and lots of overt racists to post, and even makes it a point to post some stories that put blacks in general in a very, very bad light.
Sounds to me like you believe in collective guilt.
Report Post »George Patton
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:53am@ghost. I expect better from you. You are being intellectually dishonest when you equate the comments section of this website with the content section of a newsletter. Glenn Beck is only responsible for the content section of this website, not the comment section….similarly ron paul is responsible for the content section of his newsletter, not the comment section(which it had none, obviously, being a newsletter). Ron Paul has faults, he is a man. It is the refusal of paul supporters to acknowledge his legitimate faults that make it seem as if they elevate him above the status of a man, that turns so many people off. It is this “faultless man who is the only one who can save the nation” attitude that is reminiscent of obama drones.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:56amRepublicorp??? Why no answer? The BLAZE is Glenn’s and i have seen plenty of racist stuff on here. Is he guilty of racism by association or not? We KNOW it is Glenn’s site, we see the racist comments….What say you? I hear crickets….
Report Post »hauschild
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 11:40amRINO’s reducing themselves to race-bating. How unfortunate that they feel the need to do this because they cannot compete in the arena of ideas. It is going to be precisely why Obama will win a second term.
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 5:57pm@Jenny Lind – Your the one being brainwashed Pal. Keep watching TV, sheep.
Report Post »hauschild
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 8:41amThis is foolish talk, of which Morris is sometimes guilty.
Morris comes from that Rove camp where they just can‘t seem to get the fact that RINO’s don’t accomplish much.
Again, no Paul lover, but consider the options.
Report Post »SheriS
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 8:57amDick Morris has absolutely no involvement with the Rove camp—I’m sure if Rove saw that statement, you would throw-up! Paul is no Conservative and Rove is—they are pretty much opposite!
Report Post »hauschild
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:47amNo, Rove is kinda stuck in time – along with Morris. They’re part of the “country clubbers” that once ruled, but like that once beautiful lady that has suddenly aged, are finding it difficult to grasp that they’re no longer “beautiful”, so to speak.
They’re also both huge into conventional wisdom, which is no longer so “conventional”.
Basically, to say Ron Paul does not have conservative roots is asinine and completely stupid. And, this was only said because Ron Paul is bucking that “conventional” trend. If you think Gringrich or Romney or Perry are true conservatives, then that word has lost its original meaning.
It’s another classic – RINO’s calling Ron Paul liberal. Oh, that’s rich.
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 5:56pmHow can you say Paul is not conservative. Go look up what a conservative means dummy. I guess Paul gonna take your government job away. Hater
Report Post »JLGunner
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 8:41amSo let the Morris bashing begin paulies…..
Report Post »PPMStudios
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 8:51amMy thoughts exactly!!
As I watched Eric and Morris on the Factor last night, I almost prayed out loud for one of these sites to post this story!!
The Paul supporters are like the Obama supporters 3-4 years ago. Say something that can even be remotely construed as negative towards RP and the weapons come out!! Almost a messianic following… Hey! Just like Obama…..
Report Post »ThePostman
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 8:52amhttp://www.ontheissues.org/Ron_Paul.htm
Anti-abortion, check. Must be a lefty.
Anti-war, check. Must be a lefty.
Anti-big government, check. Must be a lefty.
Pro-constitution, check. Must be a lefty.
and on and on.
Report Post »Fella
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 8:58amOn August 29, 1996, Morris resigned from the Clinton campaign after tabloid reports stated that he had been involved with a female prostitute, Sherry Rowlands, as reported by the Washington Post.
The convicted Toe sucker?
this guy? —> http://youtu.be/up_9oQQhOaY
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:08amSo let the Morris bashing begin paulies…..sums it up. All they can do is bash, other than run his mouth and send out a nice racist newsletter, what has Paul done? All talk ….no walk. But the Bots will tell you what he ***will do*** I do give RP credit for finding a money cow among the kooks that has made him one of the 1%. Nothing like a good money bomb to buy more gold stocks…..
Report Post »PPMStudios
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:10am@ Thepostman
When you put it like that it actually sounds a bit like that party that sprang up in Germany, circa 1930′s. They told their people they were “anti-abortion”, “anti-war”, definitely “anti-big government”, and pro-party platform (our Constitution in this case).
Not saying there’s a connection of course….
Report Post »JustPeachy
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:10amI see it didn’t take long. It’s already begun.
For those doing it, that is the very tactic of the LEFT. If you don‘t care for what someone’s views are, rather than counter the argument with facts, destroy the PERSON.
When you do that, you are acting just as the LEFT does. The Clintons’ favorite tactic!
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:37amStrange isn’t it? Y’all are allowed to smear and destroy Paul, but if somebody steps up and says “no”, that means they’re brainwashed.
Kind of a pre-emptive ad hominem thing you have going on there folks.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:52amGHOSTOFJEFFERSON is it smearing when the bots are doing it? Or is that a one way street?
Report Post »Fella
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:55amYea Republicdork, it’s a one way street. Shouldn’t you be over at huffington post commiserating with all your liberal friends about the racist newsletters? Maybe they can dig up some new links for you to spam RP stories with!
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:00am@Republicorp
I don’t endorse nor participate in the ad hominem on Morris either (or anybody really), actually. If you’ll take time to examine the thread, I’ve not once attacked Morris personally, though I do stand against his ideas and ideology.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:07amGHOSTOFJEFFERSON I can agree with that
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:11amFELLA maybe you should be at some Neo-Nazi rally?
Report Post »http://www.alternet.org/news/153551/ron_paul_and_libertarianism's_dirty_secret_–_pandering_to_racist_%22rednecks%22_to_get_ahead
RepubliCorp
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:26amFELLA
Report Post »“The convicted Toe sucker” Are you anti-Toe?
I know, the founding fathers didn’t suck toes..
Toe sucking isn’t in the constitution!
Not to worry …I think the guy is a jerk too……..& I couldn’t care less what he has to say
But I am happy he made the Bots nutz
LimaBean
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 2:08pmHmm…the “go for the throat” comments thrown around here is sad. Some one voices their opinion about not liking “your guy” and the virulent attacking begins. I really really really hope not all PAUL supports act and react in this way.
Report Post »Shane74
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 2:44pmPRM- The problem with “saying something remotely about RP”, is that you aren’t actually saying anything at all. You‘re repeating lies you’re told.
They intentionally don’t air Ron Paul much. When they do, his very intricate discussions which usually take a good hour to get through the nitty gritty of, get boiled down to maybe a few minutes.
They then feed you their spin on him, and it’s off to the races.
Stop being duped.
I just wish that for ONCE, the anti-Paul crowd could actually state Ron Paul’s stances CORRECTLY.
The reason why people are now “going for the throat”, is that we’re fed up with hearing people repeat that the sun is black and gives no light.
Report Post »