Politics

Did Rush Limbaugh Just Endorse Rick Santorum in Florida Primary?

(H/T to the diligent Daily Rushbo)

 

Comments (187)

1 2 3 4
  • Southpaw
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:47pm

    I would love to see Romney and Gingrich destroy each other and pave the way for Santorum to get more air time. The establishment and media are never going to allow that to happen. I will continue to support Santorum, but he is a long shot at the end of the day. The sad part is that although they are a minority, Santorum’s supporters have passion for the views he brings to the race. People who say principle matters less than “electability” are wrong at the end of the day. Passion for a candidate will get someone elected (i.e. Reagan). Voting for a candidate as a way of voting against another will give us a loser every time (i.e.McCain, Dole, etc.).

    Obama’s supporters, however misled, are passionate. He will win re-election if voters are not inspired to vote FOR new leadership rather than AGAINST the current administration.

    Report Post »  
    • CCsunnyDazey
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:58pm

      I believe it will happen. Why? In the last 24 hours, I have seen more people turn towards Santorum than I have seen in months. For months, I have been an avid Santorum supporter. I have donated to his campaign, used Facebook and Twitter to support him, put up yard signs all over my city, and convinced everyone I know that he is our best bet. I have never been this passionate over any candidate and I intend to keep on supporting him until he wins. Join me and so many others who believe he is the best one to defeat Obama.

      Report Post »  
    • lillymckim
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:59pm

      Cheap attempt to sway people in Florida to vote for Santorum..

      Glen .. you vote your moral sense and we will vote ours..

      My conscience went for Newt.. in an early vote last week

      Report Post » lillymckim  
    • TeaPartyForRomney
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 4:03pm

      I say good for Santorum. I would rather see him get the support than Gingrich. Gingrich has changed his positions more than anyone I have ever seen. Always playing the populist card. Then again that is also what I thought about Romney until I started researching his background. Romney is no Massachusetts liberal. He was a conservative/moderate in 1994, became much more conservative in 2002 in the race for governor, and then made the final conversion after being converted on pro-life issues when he had a bill put on his desk that questioned his stance, this much like Reagan. Then Cardinal O’Malley and the Pilot Catholic News, that worked with him on the social issues and getting the message out wrote some articles about his true conversion. You can assume a lot of things but they were there working with Romney and backed him up after every attack.

      Romney has done more for traditional marriage than any other governor and candidate we have. Find out more at TeaPartyforRomney.com.

      This is why I endorse Romney, I want someone that is conservative, especially on the social issues. Gingrich‘s ads are all blatantly false about Romney’s record and easily defended.

      Question: Why would the Vatican Envoy as well as Massachusetts Catholic leaders endorse Romney over their Gingrich and Santorum, who are both Catholics.

      Report Post »  
    • Stuck_in_CA
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 4:12pm

      The Florida Smear Campaign–Thomas Sowell
      The Republican establishment is pulling out all the stops to try to keep Newt Gingrich from becoming the party’s nominee for President of the United States — and some are not letting the facts get in their way… Do the Romney camp and the Republican establishment not know this, a dozen years later? Or are they far less concerned with whether the charges will stand up than they are about smearing Gingrich on the eve of the Florida primaries?

      There are also charges made about what Congressman Gingrich said about Ronald Reagan on March 21, 1986. But this too is a matter of public record, since his remarks are available in the Congressional Record of that date, so it is remarkable that there should be any controversy about it at this late date… http://townhall.com/columnists/thomassowell/2012/01/31/the_florida_smear_campaign

      Report Post » Stuck_in_CA  
    • FranciscoDAnconia
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 4:47pm

      Santorum? You mean the guy that is a big government spender? The one that wants to save all of the villages in africa? The guy that is against “right to work”?

      Report Post »  
    • Southpaw
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 4:49pm

      I agree with you. One thing I have noticed to Santorum’s benefit the last few months has been his response on Facebook. A few months ago I would have friends with as many ‘likes’ and comments on posts as Santorum had on his. Now when he posts something hundreds and thousands of people are noticing. If there was ever a time for a lead shift the Florida primary is it. Hopefully he will be able to secure a strong finish if not the lead.

      Report Post »  
    • TeaPartyForRomney
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 5:16pm

      STUCK_IN_CA,

      That is a smear job by a Gingrich Surrogate, Thomas Sowell came out for Newt a while ago and yet in his so called journalistic manner, he neglected the poll of Floridians that say that the Gingrich ads are way worse than Romney or any other candidate.

      Remember also that Gingrich started it on Nov 28, 2011 when he went after Romney’s Conservatism. Romney was asked if he was going to respond, he said wait for the debate, then he was criticized for not standing up for himself. The next day he responded and that was his first negative ad. Thanks Newt for getting the negative attacks started.

      Media Malfeasance, even on the right… when it comes to an election and favorites.

      Report Post »  
    • roastbeefman
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 5:19pm

      Santorum for President beats out all the others. Do not think he has the funding to win the primary. Please donate to his campaigne, I have.

      Report Post »  
    • ToStand
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 5:41pm

      You are so right! The only way to win this is to have passion. I would take a week’s vacation to campaign for Rick Santorum, but I would not do the same for Gingrich or Romney.

      Report Post »  
    • MS-GlenNBC
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 6:14pm

      Don’t be fooled….

      Romney and his Smear Machine will beat Santorum back into a pennsylvania coal mine.

      Don’t think for a second that Romney will choose the high road. This Wall Street Elite Democrat running as a Republican will out spend Santorum and rip him a new butt hole. The only difference is it will only take one state to do it. Santorum will drop to single didgets and will never

      Report Post » MS-GlenNBC  
    • PresidentDowngrade
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 6:16pm

      Another stupid article from the home of Dr Demento. Rush spent the whole day saying he wouldn’t endorse anyone publicly.

      Report Post »  
    • jb.kibs
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 6:35pm

      wow… we are doomed. let’s just keep doing the same thing over and over and expect different results. that should work right?

      Report Post »  
    • jb.kibs
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 6:42pm

      you guys do know that anyone the main stream media endorses is going to cater to corporations and keep us on the corporatist tracks… people think democrats and republicans means socialist and capitalist… you couldn’t be more wrong… they are both corporatists. one wants to enslave you economically and one what’s to enslave you “morally”. you can not dictate morality, people will reject it because of the use of force upon them. so if you want to continue this corporatist bs, which at the same time, they are calling our constitution just a piece of paper and it would be easier if this was a dictatorship, as long as they are the dictator… etc..

      either choose someone who wants us ALL, every man, woman and child, to follow the constitution. or keep up the treason and watch our nation fall to complete tyranny.

      4God, 4Liberty and a Constitutional Republic.

      Report Post »  
    • koyettsu
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 7:12pm

      They don’t need to destroy themselves, they were broken long before they got into the race.

      Report Post »  
    • kritacul
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 7:16pm

      The country NEEDS this to happen.
      We don’t need Obama 2.0 in Romney nor a Flip-Flopping Progressive in Gingrich. Santorum is the ONLY Conservative and he would right the ship.

      Report Post »  
    • Tired of Code Names
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 7:52pm

      @Southpaw The dilemma here is whether we vote for another socialist progressive or someone who is not. Gingrich pissed off the whole establishment in his day. A vote for mitt is a vote for eventual communism in this country in my opinion. I find this interesting. Beck will hammer every other candidate…not so much Santorum….but…he has NO comment on biship romney and his progressivism. I wish Beck would be fair and balanced.

      Report Post »  
    • joydbrower
      Posted on February 1, 2012 at 9:23am

      Spot on!! I’ve been going back & forth about this whole thing – and, at the end of the day, I HAVE to vote for the one with whom I agree the most and, of course, in principle. And right now, the only candidate standing that fills the bill is long-shot Santorum. But I’d rather be passionate for him and work for him that either Newt or Mitts, both of whom I simply cannot stand on multiple levels!! Of course, were Palin in the race, she was my first choice anyway. But it we’re going down, I want to be in that boat with “my peeps” – the TRUE “believers,” the hardcore and unwavering Conservatives! At this point, frankly, I’m POST-Republican!! Hate that GOP machine and the good ol‘ boys’ Establishment!!

      Report Post » joydbrower  
  • richahlgrim
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:47pm

    Santorum/West 2012!
    Mittens is a Lieberal in Republician clothing and
    Noot is a Progressive in conserative clothing…. Neither can be believed or trusted!

    Report Post »  
    • constantreverie
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 4:00pm

      No, Mitt is not a liberal. He was moderate in the past, but he has converted to conservatism. He has even said this. He has flipped, but he has not flopped back. I weclome anyone who sees the light. I find it funny how people are so forgiving of Newts adultery saying that he has changed or repented, yet then nobody thinks that you can change any of your political ideologies.

      Report Post »  
    • NOT A CRAZY
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 4:05pm

      Ditto Rich.

      Report Post » NOT A CRAZY  
    • kscottie
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 4:10pm

      AH so MITT can have a change of Values ( against Reagan conservatism, teen abortion without consent of parents) but Newt is a Flip-Flopper

      sorry…doesn’t seem to wash.

      Report Post » kscottie  
    • american1st
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 4:19pm

      @consrevier “he has flipped but not flopped”
      …..YET…..
      just wait till the general election when he runs back to the center/left (which is were he really has been all along) to try to get votes ….

      mit the political weather-vain…… not a good choice

      Report Post » american1st  
    • marvel
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 4:49pm

      @american1st

      Actually no. Romney has always governed as a conservative, and has only become more conservative over time.

      Just follow the link and check out his record.

      http://evangelicalsformitt.org/on-the-issues

      Just as an example, let’s take abortion. Because Romney once lost a close loved one due to a botched illegal abortion, he adopted a policy in his early career of pro- safe and legal abortion. Yet, he has always been personally pro-life, as a matter of religious conviction, being a faithful latter-day saint in good standing with the Church. In case you didn’t know, the LDS Church has the following policy concerning abortion:

      “The Church opposes abortion and counsels its members not to submit to or perform an abortion except in the rare cases where, in the opinion of competent medical counsel, the life or good health of the mother is seriously endangered or where the pregnancy was caused by rape and produces serious emotional trauma in the mother. Even then it should be done only after counseling with the local presiding priesthood authority and after receiving divine confirmation through prayer.

      Abortion must be considered one of the most revolting and sinful practices in this day, when we are witnessing the frightening evidence of permissiveness leading to sexual immorality.” (http://www.lds.org/new-era/1973/04/policies-and-procedures-statement-on-abortion?lang=eng)

      That happens to be his personal policy as well, and always has been.

      Report Post » marvel  
    • marvel
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 5:03pm

      @american1st

      I ran out of space, but I would also point out that not all LDS agree with Church policies, like the one about abortion. But Romney does, since he himself has served as a “local presiding priesthood authority”, as the policy references, having been a bishop and a stake president, which are lay positions of authority in the Church. In order to qualify to serve in those positions, one must be in agreement with the teachings of the Church on these matters, especially if you are to counsel others concerning Church policy.

      So, in conclusion, there is ample evidence in Romney’s history to support the fact that he is pro-life and always has been. Plus his record as governor proves that he governed as a strong pro-life advocate. Here are some examples:

      - He is a “convert” to the (public) pro-life position, much like Ronald Reagan
      - He believes life begins at conception
      - He vetoed a bill to give kids access to emergency contraception without parents’ knowledge
      - He promised a “moratorium” on changes to abortion laws in his 2002 gubernatorial run
      - He opposes Roe v. Wade and thinks states should set abortion policy
      - He opposes cloning of human embryos for stem cell research—even though his wife has multiple sclerosis
      - He vetoed a bill to expand such research despite the overwhelmingly hostile liberal majority in his state legislature

      Marvel

      Report Post » marvel  
    • Hobbs57
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 5:38pm

      @american1st, Not sure who you are supporting, but many candidates have come to terms with abortion, including many voters. Let’s talk about Santorums wife, who was actually a live in girlfriend of an abortion doctor for 6 years. She is not anti-abortion. I don’t doubt her conversion, nor do I doubt the fact that even though Santorum and his wife forced a birth early because the life of his wife was at stake. Some claim this was an abortion. I don’t question it, even if it was. I do wonder if this was the reason he had that weird story about bringing the baby home and showing the unborn to the family. I am guessing to prove that they didn’t have an abortion and still strongly cared about the life of child. Which is also understandable, but weird. However, I live next to Butler County where Santorum grew up, worked with a lot of those guys, and there are many a little off up there to begin with, so it really doesn’t surprise me. It’s just sad if this is the case and he had to go to such lengths in order to “prove” he was pro-life. Like Romney said, it wasn’t until he realized the impact until he had the power to allocate such an action as an abortion, by say, signing in a law or something. Newt constant message he runs non stop about his statement when he was younger is one that many people take when they are younger, especially males. It is hard for a male to understand and woman can get really uptight about the right thing.Hey, it’s their choice, they have to live

      Report Post » Hobbs57  
    • ToStand
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 5:44pm

      Santorum/West 2012 !

      Report Post »  
    • BobtheMoron
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 6:02pm

      Mutt and Nut are both Progressives. It is what it is.

      Report Post » BobtheMoron  
    • american1st
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 6:07pm

      i wasn’t commenting on abortion specifically… but having lived in Mormon community’s i might give him that one as being in the “honest change of heart” category..

      here is a short list of issues he has flipped on
      - For A Path To Citizenship, Then Against
      - Anti-Reagan then, now Pro-Reagan
      - National Rifle Association And Gun Laws
      - Don‘t Ask Don’t Tell
      - position on same-sex marriage
      - healthcare
      etc etc … the point being…. he (and Gingrich and Santorum ) are POLITICIANS FIRST and conservative when speaking to the voters or on those occasions when it happens to align with their own best interests … this is the same kind of political gamesmanship that has put our country on the ragged edge, we see it with obama, we see it in Bush in hindsight
      BUT WE ARE BLIND TO IT in our candidates when they run for office ???? WHY ???

      as Americans we are duty bound to have a distrust of government and the things politicians say to us, vote for whomever you think is best….. but don’t just take their word for it.. look at their records as well… the last thing we need right now is more of the same…

      Report Post » american1st  
    • Chuck Stein
      Posted on February 1, 2012 at 1:26am

      @ Marvel
      I am for Santorum. I wished he had run in 2008 (and moaned to everyone around me about Rick Santorum’s absence from the field in 2008). Santorum is the only one I have given money to in the primary campaign. I am very comfortable with Santorum’s conservative “creds.”
      Now . . about Romney . . . I’m not going to dispute anything you have posted about him. Still, I am not at all comfortable with him being the nominee. Do you know what would give me comfort? A list of Romney’s cabinet. People are policy. John Bolton has endordsed Romney, but Gingrich (who is the worst of the 4 remaining) has said he would appoint Bolton as Secretary of State. Why doesn’t Romney do the same? How about picks for A.G., Interior (Sarah Palin would be my pick), Sec. Def., etc.? PEOPLE ARE POLICY. I want to know the people so that I can get a vision of the policy.

      Report Post »  
  • StuffAbus
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:47pm

    YES the very last second of the show thats what he said I laughed so hard.

    Report Post »  
    • whatthecrazy
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 4:38pm

      I know i heard it too……he’s a blast

      Report Post »  
    • donh2
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 5:00pm

      Mark did the same thing the night before, in the same last second timing. Proof positive a sinister conspiracy is afoot amongst the AM talk radio hosts who are under the thumb of a dictate…. The establishment knows endorsing Romney would be too costly with talk radio audience and lose credibility for the host….so they have been cut slack to push the decoy Sanitarium to undercut Gingrich and keep the anybody but Romney vote too divided to succeed. This is how RINOS operate …fake like they are on your side until the dau of battle…then sell you out for their own personal riches . They are working with the RINOS to distroy the Tea Party…including Bennedict Beck.

      Report Post »  
  • IZAYAFIVE2021
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:47pm

    Most of the true conservatives are backing Santorum in one way or another (Beck, Malkin, etc). I believe that Palin wants more votes for Gingrich just to keep the race going. I believe the more exposure Santorum gets the more people will realize who is the most conservative. Seems like Rubio would probably support him but wanted to be respectful to Romney who supported him in his election.

    As for me and my house (5) we voted for Santorum today. Unfortunately, my precinct in Miami was empty! Apathy on the part of citizens is part of the reason were in this mess to begin with.

    Report Post » IZAYAFIVE2021  
    • kscottie
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 4:12pm

      extactly…Palin has said that all along that its better for it to go long an not let Obama and the Lib machine have too much attack time.

      Report Post » kscottie  
  • Toddski1963
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:46pm

    I considered myself a Tea Party member until people like this ass, along with Palin, Levin…etc have really turned me off within the past 2 weeks…….I’m so done …To think I backed these people through thick and thin….Ciao

    Report Post »  
    • NOT A CRAZY
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:54pm

      Blah, blah, blah…just admit that you are really a PaulBot.

      Report Post » NOT A CRAZY  
    • THXll38
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:59pm

      I am in the same boat. That said, I can proudly admit that I am a Paulbot supporter. I am more conservative than these cons any day. Then again, being a NeoCon is nothing more than being a statist. Liberals and Cons are the same thing — just different.

      Report Post » THXll38  
    • jb.kibs
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 6:52pm

      the difference is this.
      todays “democrats” want to enslave you economically and say that you have no property rights.
      todays “republicans” want to enslave you morally and some physical (what you can or can not put in your body)

      libertarians want to leave you alone to make your own choices and let people come together voluntarily to seek solutions to their problems. the initiation of force is never justified morally. free market and capitalism > corporatism.

      both democrats and republicans today are authoritarian corporatists…

      Report Post »  
    • BeckPalin2012
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 10:46pm

      Dont let the door hit you in the arse!

      Report Post »  
  • JPFLOYD
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:46pm

    I think it was more food for thougt, not an endorsement, but saying give this guy thought before you mindlessly pick between the bickering sisters. And on Newt, any thought I had of considering him in primary has flown out the window with the same anti-Romney ads playing over and over and over and over on the local talk station. Not that I like Romney, but to hear a progressive like Newt bemoaning Romney’s lack of conservatism is like beating my head into a concrete wall repeatedly.

    That being said I will be voting for WHOEVER is running against Obummer

    Report Post »  
    • JQCitizen
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 4:32pm

      “the Bickering Sisters”; – HA! I LOVE IT!!! – I was once teaching two homeschooling boys an art class, and they were best buds and argueing like that, and I told them. “You two sound like a pair of GIRLS”!

      Boy, did that fight STOP SUDDENLY!

      Come to think of it, that is EXACTLY what Gingrich and Santorum remind me of! LOL!

      Report Post »  
    • JQCitizen
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 4:34pm

      Sorry, meant Gingrich and Romney; SANTORUM ON MY MIND, cause if I get a chance, by May, he is who I am voting for!!!

      Report Post »  
  • NativeCracker
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:45pm

    Doctor Paul is not ‘guilty of any transgressions against conservatism’

    Report Post » NativeCracker  
    • NOT A CRAZY
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:55pm

      He is guilty of wanting to pull support from Israel. He believes it would be OK to let Iran have The Bomb. I am not ok with either one of those things.

      Report Post » NOT A CRAZY  
    • THXll38
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 4:03pm

      Not true crazy -

      Paul is about Israel and all countries being sovereign. Paul supports Israel dealing with there problems the way Israel thinks that they should. In other words, Israel is nothing more than a stepchild to America. You really believe that us sending aid and flexing our muscles help Israel? Do you really think waving our finger and saying no no is good for Israel. All we should be doing is supporting the Israel with a big thumbs up and tell them we got your back, even though you really don’t need it.

      Report Post » THXll38  
    • NOT A CRAZY
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 4:11pm

      THX- You don’t think that Israel needs our financial and more importantly military support? Israel the little tiny postage stamp that is surrounded by enemies upon enemies. I believe Israel has God protecting them but I also believe, and history shows, that one must defend themselves also. How would Israel ever defend herself if it was not for the arms, military support and finances we provide? I am all for pulling the money we give our enemies and terrorist, but Israel, Give me a break.

      Report Post » NOT A CRAZY  
    • NOT A CRAZY
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 4:13pm

      Oh and to be more specific THX…YES, I absolutely believe that helping Israel helps Israel and it helps us at the same time.

      Report Post » NOT A CRAZY  
    • THXll38
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 6:11pm

      Israel has over 400 Nukes — enough said. The US and UN is holding Israel back.

      Report Post » THXll38  
    • Honor_and_Country
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 8:06pm

      THX- 400 nukes, really?!? You think that matter against people whoactually believe in islam? And, if they use any of those against the enemys that will attack them, the fallout would probably wipe them out too!

      Report Post » Honor_and_Country  
  • poverty.sucks
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:45pm

    Rush has yet to endorse anyone or say who he will be voting for at this time. If the Blaze wants to stir anything, Rush also said something to the affect of how many will be voting for Buchanon.

    Report Post » poverty.sucks  
  • pizzacorner
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:45pm

    I listened today and this is another POS story drummed up by the Blaze.

    Report Post »  
  • TRONINTHEMORNING
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:44pm

    Rush’s bro, David; endorsed Santorum; but not him. Levin endorsed Santorum and so did Malkin. And by the way, Mark Levin joins me tomorrow in the noon hour; eastern. You want some conservative common sense, you should tune in. http://www.1530kcmn.com

    Report Post »  
  • Ballzonya
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:44pm

    Limpballs will endorse Santorum because ol‘ frothy mix doesn’t stand a chance at winning. Fats Limbaugh is just taking the easy way out as usual.

    Report Post »  
    • Texas Chris
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:48pm

      Neither Frothy Mix nor Jabba the Newt can win the 1144 delegates it takes to clinch. It’s simple math; they missed over 500 delegates in the states they failed to file for ballot access. Neither of them has a chance; Perry knew it and dropped; Michele knew it and dropped.

      Frothy and Moonbase are hoping for a brokered convention. They have no idea that Paul’s base has infiltrated the delegate pool and will vote for none but Paul.

      If Mitt doesn’t clinch before the convention, it’ll be Paul nominated.

      Report Post »  
    • rotcarpenter
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:48pm

      Do you agree with the radical homosexual that came up for that term for Santorum?

      Report Post »  
    • SoupSandwich
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:49pm

      Said little sheila from left field.

      Report Post »  
    • rotcarpenter
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 4:10pm

      Anyone that uses that term against Santorum proves they are really an angry liberal in disguise. It’s sad to see so many Ron Paul supporters using it. Don’t be vile.

      Report Post »  
  • MittensKittens
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:42pm

    Did it sound like he endorsed Santorum…noooo

    Report Post » MittensKittens  
  • justangry
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:40pm

    Is Rush still stick’n painkillers up his butt?

    Report Post » justangry  
    • NOT A CRAZY
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:58pm

      You Paulbots really are a sorry bunch.

      Report Post » NOT A CRAZY  
    • justangry
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 6:57pm

      Oh lighten up. I’m sure someone out there thought it was as funny as I did.

      Report Post » justangry  
  • NOT A CRAZY
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:39pm

    I am voting for Santorum, if he is still around, but since my state is close to 50/50 between the Catholics and the Mormons I am not holding out much hope.

    Report Post » NOT A CRAZY  
    • Texas Chris
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:49pm

      Rick cannot mathmatically clinch the nomination. He’s missed ballot access totalling over 500 delegates.

      He and Newt are done.

      It’s Paul or Romney now.

      Report Post »  
    • NOT A CRAZY
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:59pm

      The Paulbots last stand.

      Report Post » NOT A CRAZY  
  • thegreatcarnac
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:38pm

    I heard Rush today. He is endorsing no one. He simply is like the rest of us…ABO…(anybody but obama),

    Report Post »  
    • CatB
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:47pm

      Yes .. I heard him also .. however .. his brother David Limbaugh did endorse Santorum.

      I voted today in the Florida primary .. before Rush’s show.

      Santorum 2012

      Report Post »  
  • GoodStuff
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:38pm

    Romney/West 2012

    Report Post »  
    • Erin
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:41pm

      or Romney/Rubio or Romney/Christy, either one–sounds like HEAVEN

      Report Post » Erin  
    • William Hemenway
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:44pm

      Romney is a liberal and you are to if you vote for him good luck with that

      Report Post »  
    • RightPolitically
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:47pm

      Romney can’t beat Obama. Only Gingrich could do that.

      Report Post » RightPolitically  
    • pizzacorner
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:48pm

      Would West align himself with a RINO like Mittens….Mr. Co-Author of Obamacare?

      Report Post »  
    • Gonzo
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:49pm

      Romney/Christy sounds like heaven? Sounds like RINO HELL to me.

      Report Post » Gonzo  
    • Texas Chris
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:50pm

      Paul/Napolitano
      Paul/Paul
      Paul/Amash

      Report Post »  
    • JustMel71
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:56pm

      Texas Chris
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:50pm

      Paul/Napolitano
      Paul/Paul
      Paul/Amash

      I agree with you on Dr. Paul and Judge Napolitano. The Judge for VP sounds like a team for restoring America. Could not agree with you more.
      Rand is an honorable man who shows no signs of stress under pressure. I hope he gets a little more under his belt and maybe in the near future run for President.

      Report Post » JustMel71  
  • kscottie
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:36pm

    yes Glenn and Co…..he backed him so you could feel better betraying your viewers.

    You had hypocrisy of having Ann Coulter on again and bash Newt and Palin then turn around and say its all getting too negative?

    do you even hear yourself anymore?

    Y’know Ann Coulter who bashed Palin with Laura ingraham calling her the Repub Obama.

    I loved how you said you can’t understand Sarahs decisions…yet you have a open line to contact her anytime…you had her on dozens of times. You scared? Or is it just easier to bash her?

    Glad I canceled my GBTV sub.

    Report Post » kscottie  
    • JPFLOYD
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:42pm

      We would appreciate you cancelling your blaze account too moron.

      Report Post »  
    • NOT A CRAZY
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:43pm

      Ditto…Glad I never got a GBTV subscription to start with. Glenn is a true blue LDS propaganda machine. I already had deep suspicions, but after all the stuff he has said over the years and then he willing endorsed Romney, I knew the LDS fix was in.

      Report Post » NOT A CRAZY  
    • kscottie
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:44pm

      BTW Glenn, if its getting to vitriolic in the campaign primaries, then why have the laugh fest with ROMNEY and CHRISTIE supporter Coulter?

      If You stand for Santorum and the right candidate ( which doesn’t have the numbers to win unfortunately) then why the laughfest?

      ah the hypocrisy.

      Report Post » kscottie  
    • Texas Chris
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:52pm

      Glenn has picked the least likely to win so he could, in the end, (sigh) support Romney, I guess…

      Yeah, right. I‘m pretty sure it’s been Romney all along.

      Report Post »  
    • MS-GlenNBC
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:53pm

      My thoughts exactly… Glenn talks about how he loves Sarah Palin and now….

      He sounds like MSNBC or MS-glenNBC

      Glenn, why don’t you call Sarah tomorrow and ask her to explain. Instead you tell the audience how you are reading a book on Chivalry. Well lets just look at your record. Here are two recent calls from your show. How nice were you to these women?

      Lets have a listen….. in your own words.

      Trish http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aWhwxcqqqY
      Carroll http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQ3LbyunecA

      Class Act !

      Report Post » MS-GlenNBC  
    • texasnellie
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:55pm

      I believe he also said that all of Newt and Santorum supporters out numbered Romney’s.. It‘s not over let’s keep this going, keep vetting. I am tired of all the bashing also. I guess Beck is making a point but I’m am turning him off more and more lately. He says he doesn’t care if we watch or not, well I guess he can run his network without our money.

      Report Post »  
    • MS-GlenNBC
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:59pm

      Didn’t Glenn Fat and Stupid make fun of Ann Coulter when she was all wet for Chris Christie?

      Romney will be the nominee and we will lose. oh. that is a quote.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vo6SOpOE788

      Report Post » MS-GlenNBC  
    • Ishmot2
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 4:01pm

      Sarah is apparently not what she seemed sad to say, if she endorses Newt. He is as progresive as Hillary,and Owebummer.

      Report Post »  
    • kscottie
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 4:06pm

      @texasnellie

      I agree, I was in the same boat. Somewhere along the line Glenns disdain for Gingrich is turning him petty and instead of picking up some of Coulters hypocrisy, he chose to criticize Sarah without even just talking to her.

      Similar thing with Gingrich and Cain,…He asked Newt on his show to ” answer the tough questions, but cut the guy down after he came on the show and at least cordially answered the questions.

      Sorry, just can’t follow Glenn anymore.

      Report Post » kscottie  
    • NOT A CRAZY
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 4:21pm

      Thanks for the video MS-Glennbc. I just heard Glen say he supported Romney the other day and now thanks to your video I heard that Glen is saying he supports Santorum. I guess I need to apologize to Glenn Beck. I apologize Glenn.

      Report Post » NOT A CRAZY  
    • BeckPalin2012
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 10:53pm

      +1 for that comment JP

      Report Post »  
    • edmundburk
      Posted on February 1, 2012 at 1:26am

      i would cancel to if beck is party to trashing sarah palin, by,the way this must be a progressive wet dream, so many conservitives bashing each other. Although ann coulter deserves everything he I mean, she gets!

      Report Post » edmundburk  
  • Erin
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:35pm

    I listened to Rush today. He DID NOT endorse anyone today. He said he WOULD NOT do that. The Blaze is grasping

    Report Post » Erin  
  • Gonzo
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:34pm

    He can’t endorse because he will have to support Romeny when he gets the nomination….just like the rest of us. That tells you one thing, he’s no Romney fan.

    Report Post » Gonzo  
    • Anonymous T. Irrelevant
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:38pm

      One can tell just by listening to him that Rush is no Romney fan. I didn’t hear him endorsing Santorum.

      Report Post » Anonymous T. Irrelevant  
    • Erin
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:39pm

      Funny–he sure was four years ago. But seriously, who cares what any of these talk show host say or who they endorse–we are a FREE country–so make your decision on who YOU think would be best, and stop blindfully following others and the ‘popular candidate’. Lets not already give ourselves over to a Socialist way of living–and MAKE OUR OWN MINDS UP! (while we still can)!

      Report Post » Erin  
    • Gonzo
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:41pm

      Spot on Anon. He will rally himself to support Romney when the time comes but their will be no joy in it for him. I know just how he feels.

      Report Post » Gonzo  
    • circleDwagons
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:41pm

      Rush , hannity, glenn and palin will have to endorse romney but that does not mean that We have to.

      Report Post » circleDwagons  
    • Gonzo
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 4:08pm

      It’s going to be him or Obama CircleDwagons, not much of a choice.

      Report Post » Gonzo  
  • Seneca
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:34pm

    He was speaking about “global warming” for goodness sake!
    The man (Rush) is keeping his cards VERY close to the chest.

    Report Post » Seneca  
  • progressiveslayer
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:34pm

    Does it matter if he did? Romney will get the nomination and we’ll have RINO vs.the skinny Marxist and the republic loses.

    Report Post » progressiveslayer  
  • maroon67
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:32pm

    Yes! Faith, Family, and Freedom!

    Report Post » maroon67  
  • I am 'We the People
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:30pm

    I just heard this as well, not sure, but Santorum has his own issues, just like each other candidate. Yes, Ron Paul has some issues…and I like him. Who I will vote for…still not sure, but obama is out.

    Report Post » I am 'We the People  
  • cripplecreek
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:29pm

    He’ll be getting hate mail by 4 PM if he did.

    He‘s right about the fact that I won’t be voting for Gingrich if Santorum drops out. That doesn‘t mean I’ll vote for Romney. Only that I have no use for Gingrich.

    Report Post »  
    • CCsunnyDazey
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:43pm

      I have no use for Newt or Romney. I support Santorum because he is the only man in this race who has a chance to beat Obama. PPP Polls says that Santorum is a bigger long-term threat to Romney then Gingrich.
      If you want RINO Romney- vote for Newt! If you want Obama- vote for Newt or Romney! If Santorum does not win, I will have a hard time voting for Romney or Newt. This BS about Santorum being broke is pathetic as Newt begging Santorum to drop out. Santorum rose over $4.2 million in Jan. Get behind him and let’s take America back!

      Report Post »  
    • dhb1ibo
      Posted on January 31, 2012 at 4:00pm

      If Newt wins the presidency in ‘12 the only thing that will change is the President in ’16. I fear the same will be true if Romney wins. So if Santorum drops out the best thing that could happen would be 4 more years of the dictator & look for a real conservative in ‘16.

      Report Post » dhb1ibo  
  • KAdams
    Posted on January 31, 2012 at 3:28pm

    No

    Report Post »  
1 2 3 4

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love