Do You Know What a ‘Pansexual’ Is? A TX State Rep. Just Came Out as One
- Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:27pm by
Erica Ritz
- Print »
- Email »
Democrat Mary Gonzalez was the first lesbian to openly serve in the Texas House of Representatives, and now she’s becoming the first “pansexual,” too.
“During the campaign if I had identified as pansexual, I would have overwhelmed everyone…Now that I’m out of the campaign, I’m completely much more able to define it,” she explained.
So what, exactly, is a “pansexual”? And how is it different from “bisexual”?
The Huffington Post summarizes:
Though many might describe Gonzalez’s orientation as bisexual, pansexuals don’t believe in a “gender binary,” and hence can be attracted to all gender identities.
Gonzalez specified to the Voice that she doesn’t believe in a gender binary because “gender identity isn’t the defining part of my attraction,” and that she never fully embraced the term “lesbian.” Although she came out as bisexual at age 21, Gonzalez said she has also dated transgender and “gender-queer” people, in addition to women.
[...]
Gonzalez… continued: “As I started to recognize the gender spectrum and dated along the gender spectrum, I was searching for words that connected to that reality, for words that embraced the spectrum. At the time I didn’t feel as if the term bisexual was encompassing of a gender spectrum that I was dating and attracted to.“ [Emphasis added]
As Gonzalez defines it, apparently a “pansexual” is attracted to men, women, men who identify as women, women who identify as men, and everything in between, because they don’t recognize “gender binaries.”
“This is a big victory for Mary, for El Paso and for Texas,” said Chuck Wolfe, president and CEO of the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund reportedly said. “The people of El Paso will be represented by a talented and committed fighter who knows how to get things done in Austin. And LGBT Texans will be represented by an authentic voice in the Capitol, standing up and speaking out for fairness and freedom for all.”
Denis Dison, a spokesperson for the Victory Fund, added that there are several bisexual U.S. Representatives and they should “inform the media and others about the term they prefer.”
“That sort of education is a good thing,” he said.






















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (1154)
T-2
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:40pmShe’s in the wrong business.
Report Post »HKS
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:46pmThose Democrats have people in their ranks that don’t even have names, so they make one up. What a bunch.
Report Post »iampraying4u
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:53pmTo much info.
Report Post »Motherofthree
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:00pmAs people continue to have sex, and not make love, their senses are diminished and they reach a point where they have to do something more unusual, more edgy to get any pleasure. Hence the overwhelming emotionally inept people claiming to be something other than heterosexual. Only praying without ceasing will save us now.
Report Post »iblvingd
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:04pmWhat does an individual sexual proclivity have to do with running the government? Who gives a rats azz what someone does in their bedroom! It should stay in that bedroom! Governing a state or a country should have nothing to do about the sexual proclivity of people. The only time it should be anyone’s business is when it is an activity it breaks the law, like abuse, rape and pedophilia!
Mil-Dot
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:05pmSo basically, she is a fruitcake.
Pilgrimsarbour
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:07pmAnd I need to know this why, exactly?
Report Post »sillyfreshness
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:07pmPeople like her are mentally ill and they let their sexuality…..or more blatantly, their sex acts define them. They want to be defined by how they “get off.” How they orgasm. What‘s worse is you aren’t suppose to find anything weird about how they define themselves either. If you do, then you are the one who is mentally ill and you are suffering from “homophobia.”
Report Post »Independent4233
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:08pm“gender identity isn’t the defining part of my attraction,”
How can she know about “defining” her attraction since that is something that others determine about a person?
What she is is just another freak in a freak show that is crawling out of the woodwork, exposing her kookiness before the world.
No group of oddballs can go counter to natural law for very long and survive for any length of time.
Report Post »Shiroi Raion
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:10pmShe’s a fluke of nature… men, women, children, bedposts, donkeys, whatever…
Report Post »Does LGBT cover this? Is it PLGBT or can we just call them P now since P covers everything and since Pan is the prefix for everything? These nymphos are going to take every letter in the alphabet and still need more afterwards.
Kaoscontrol
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:10pmRush Limbaugh had a better word: “Slut”
watersRpeople
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:15pmSure I know what a Pansexual is. It’s someone who wants to have sex with, and lusts for the entire flock for no purpose of procreation except to satisfy a deep lust because their soul was terminated by God thousands of years ago. And they will never, never find satisfaction.
Report Post »http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan_%28mythology%29
The_Jerk
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:18pmIt’s all devolution. Tattoos and body modifications once confined to the primitive cultures featured in National Geographic are now common place. Sexual practices of the bonobos from the Congo Basin are now common practice. All fueled on by Hollywood.
Who is Hollywood?
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-stein19-2008dec19,0,4676183.column
EspaldaMojada
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:21pmPansexual is a form of the sickness and confusion regarding sexuality and morality. It is short for the Pandemic that is in the progressive people left and right. Plague and endemic would be other roots. Plagsexula, endemonic, and edemocratic could also apply. Reprobate is more appropriate or perhaps confused women in reprobation phase which is the female equivalent of the XYY syndrome. In this case it is the YYY syndrome where all normal people ask why, why, why is someone so twisted?
Report Post »ERP
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:21pmHow can a woman that attractive…be so weird? No wonder she’s a Democrat.
Report Post »TH30PH1LUS
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:21pmShe’s a Democrat and that makes it okay.
Report Post »OUTRIDER WRITER
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:22pm@MIL-DOT
Report Post »You cracked me up!
GOOD one!
Kaoscontrol
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:23pmThe Blaze photo makes her look nice and sweet– here’s what she REALLY looks like… (a jackass) See photo: http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2012/06/15/us/15TTElpaso.html
Report Post »MCDAVE
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:24pmwaiting for Rush Limbaugh”s Opinion.
Report Post »Make them stop
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:24pm******???
Report Post »watersRpeople
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:25pmA Pansexual’s misery is in just having to be alive. I have no issues with them until they try to pry into my house. Then I’ll turn them into reptiles.
Report Post »lynskinners
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:31pmForget pansexual, why stop there? She‘s probably what I’ll term a “gransexual” – meaning she’ll consider sexual relations with any animate or inanimate object or anything within the animal or plant world – dead or alive. Basically, ANYTHING.
Report Post »dennybug
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:33pmSo in other word she’ll screw anyone?!!!
Report Post »Treaty
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:38pmTexas?
Report Post »B_rad
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:38pmIn other words: If it feels good, do it.
Report Post »LIBERTARIAN T38
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:38pmWasn’t Brave New World about intoxicated youth having sex with everything and everyone? Or am I thinking of the Kennedy family?
Report Post »oldguy77
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:44pmThis is what happens when you have open borders. Just as an after thought,do you know who is secretary of labor in Washington?Hilda Solis.A mexican american.Think about it.
Report Post »huufarted
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:47pmI think she means anything with a Phallus and a Pulse but i am sure Dogs top her list of sexual partners …
Report Post »Rampart
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:51pmPansexual = No one I want governming me or my family
How much more *bizarre* can people get…?
Report Post »BryanB
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:53pmDemocrat Mary Gonzalez is Homosexual, Lesbian, “Pansexual”
“pansexuals don’t believe in a “gender binary,” and hence can be attracted to all gender identities.”
Why don’t you just call it by what it reall is……..Perverted Deviant
Report Post »Lotus503
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 3:05pmWhat was it that Rush got in trouble for calling that woman that wanted us to pay for free birth control? I think we have another candidate here for that term…
Report Post »MIBUGNU2
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 3:18pm@Kaoscontrol
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:10pm
Rush Limbaugh had a better word: “Slut”
Pretty well sums it up……..“SLUT” works for me..
Report Post »and we pay HER contraception…MegaBucks ??
MIBUGNU2
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 3:27pmThe Democratic Party has turned into a real Freak Show !!
Report Post »starting with their Queen, Nancy Pelosi..the whole F’N bunch..
and these POS say they know what’s best for us..Whata’ Joke..
Bluebonnet
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 3:31pmShiroi Raion
Report Post »Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:10pm
She’s a fluke of nature… men, women, children, bedposts, donkeys, whatever…
“““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““`
No Shirol, I think she’s a Fluck of nature. Sure wouldn’t want her to represent me on anything or be making State Laws on my behalf.
I think they have a name for people like her and it’s not pan………………….
sam1064
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 3:32pmis she attracted to a lamp post too? Seems to me that these folks are attracted to non humans too. LOL.
Report Post »labrat58
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 3:33pmMost people do not care who and what you sleep with, but hey isn’t that somwthing to be proud of? Please tell me just why this is newsworthy? Most people do not care who and what you sleep with, that is your business.
Report Post »ManThong
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 3:41pmI’m waiting for the Democrat OmniSexuals to come out..
You know.. anyone, anything, animal, vegetable or mineral anytime anywhere, groups welcome -public or private – ready, willing and able..
It’s what makes being Democrat special.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 3:42pmHonestly, at first I thought pansexual would mean she’s attracted to bread. At least if she was a man we could claim that kind of attraction was due to him being in-bread.
Report Post »LIBSALWAYSLIE
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 3:49pmWhat a load of BullCrap.
Report Post »Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 3:58pmPansexual story? 400 comments
Economic story? 8 comments
And we wonder why our country is in the boat that it’s in.
Report Post »kadster01
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 4:03pmWhy do people like this think we care?! Seriously, no one would make such a big deal about it if they’d stop inviting us into their bedrooms!
Report Post »NeoFan
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 4:04pmLets see by a show of hands…How many people want to know what her turds look like after she has a bowl movement? ……Yeah me neither.
Report Post »Hollywood
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 4:09pmNothing new. Sodom and Gomorrah’s Final condition, will be hers unless she repents, and asks forgiveness for her depravity. I will pray for her. The Lord says, in the end times many will glory in their depravity, as she does.
Report Post »Fla Del
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 4:15pmSo she is a party animal. Big deal and who he heck cares.
Report Post »Wait til she becomes pregnant and and contracts an STD. She will want all the government help she can get because it was not her fault. She should be taken care of by the rest of us who have moral restraint and some idea of how a human being should live. That’s our job, right?
Then if she does not get what she wants she will flourish on the lecture tour telling everyone how horrible people are to her just because she is different.
sillyfreshness
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 4:30pmShe should be working in the porn industry. She basically will take on anything to sexually satisfy her. I think ancient Rome had bath houses that catered to degenerates like her right before they fell.
Report Post »zorro
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 4:31pmSo many fancy words for “pervert” these days. She’s a sexual deviant, nothing more.
Report Post »cessna152
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 4:34pmI’m “Pan-money-an”… Money is the same regardless. I‘ll take it and I’ll work for it, I’ll spend it where I please give/take from whom I please.
Report Post »Ohio Guy
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 4:38pmHere is a word that she could easily have used to describe her sexual identity “Skank”. Feel free to use it any time.
Report Post »audiemurphy
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 4:48pmI love pan pizza as well as thin crust cheesy crust and regular.
Report Post »So what does that make me?
MDECKER
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 5:03pmI can’t wait for the video.
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 5:03pmNow, I know what a Pan-American is and I know Binary Math very well but, ““pansexual gender binary”?
Is that a Pan-American that only has sex with 1‘s and 0’s? Or should I say l‘s and O’s?
Report Post »Dan
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 5:14pmShe’s disgusting!
Report Post »The_Cabrito_Goat
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 5:20pmPansexual is as promiscuous as you can possibly get. This Mary Gonzales is a poor representative for lesbians, because she is an accurate portrayal of many lesbians. Gays give gays a bad name. I’ve known many lezzies who are really just bi. They got “recruited” at an early age. As such, anything with a pulse is fair game.
Report Post »SLAPTHELEFT
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 5:30pmWhat did she just win mr. Gay ceo? Oh, nothing.
Congratulations, mary, on your no prize win. What if we just call her an equal opportunity slut. Seems more reasonable to me.
Report Post »AWAKENEDAWARE
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 5:31pmEddie Murphy in Delirious said it right. Busboys, F#$K anything that moves, they walk in the room and the FISH stop SWIMMING! Gonzalez is a busboy.
Report Post »Leadthemtothelight
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 5:32pmYou just can’t make this **** up. The left get’s more bizarre by the day. And what in the hell is going on in Texas?
Report Post »SLAPTHELEFT
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 5:32pm“she knows how to get it done for the LGBT community in Austin”
Apparently she does.
Report Post »SLAPTHELEFT
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 5:34pmSo i guess now her opponents in elections cant use the video of her with the donkey as a negative campaign ad? Brilliant , mary.
Report Post »SLAPTHELEFT
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 5:50pmYeah roth that was for you.
Report Post »buttpatriot
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 6:14pmonly two things come from texas…
Report Post »db321
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 6:26pmIt is not her sexuality that we should be interested in – she has the knowledge to tell all of us what we should eat, how to raise our children, what to wear, how to spend our money, what books we should read and anything else that she think is necessary for us little people to know and do.
Report Post »polo
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 6:57pmPansexual is such a complicated word , I prefer a more simple word like “FREAK” ! ….
Report Post »Twobyfour
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 6:59pmI thought either gender goes = bisexusual.
Or does she mean she’d do it…
Report Post »With the goat, on the boat,
With the fox, in the box,
With the octopussys, in the seas?
Look4DBigPicture
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 7:07pmWe’re supposed to be interested in her sex life because …??? What a self-absorbed attention glutton … I‘m sure she’ll fairly represent the broad base of her constituency – NOT. El Paso was duped.
Report Post »LaBelle
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 7:19pmLet’s just normalize EVERY thing that is weird and abnormal.
Report Post »XScramblerX
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 7:22pmPansexual = skank! Pansexual = nymphomaniac! I’m tired of people telling me that I hate gays. It’s a natural disgust for homosexuality that is a safeguard to ensure the reproduction of the species. So if I’m disgusted with gays, it’s a perfectly normal reaction! Those people who act out this homosexuality, and the ones that accept it are not normal. They are going against nature. No wonder the country is falling apart. We have people like Mary Gonzales, a person who makes the wrong choices in life, who is now making decisions in public office. Figures!
Report Post »t00nces2
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 7:38pmFreak.
Report Post »poorrichard09
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 7:40pmSo basically she’ll have sex with anybody and everybody. Wonderful.
Report Post »BHO will probably have a new pronouncement on “pansexual rights”. Watch for it.
paperpushermj
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 8:06pmIs she saying she doesn’t care what you have between your legs as long as you … Get Her Off?
Report Post »Walkabout
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 8:10pmERP
Report Post »She is not attractive. After cursory glance one might consider her attractive. But without the top, the bottom looks like a beer belly. Her body is out of kilter already. She is suffering from progressive failure due to caloric imbalance.
Every living thing thinks about sex after a full stomach. Well her stomach is very full & has been for a long time. No wonder she wants to do the world.
Cadisasterrelief
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 8:27pmYaawwwnn. My 165 pound Mastiff has been doing this for years. He tries to “get” anything he senses weakness in. We didn‘t know there was a name for it we simply have always said he’s, “not too bright and kinda confused”. Best thing about this comment……it’s a true story.
Report Post »68Patriot
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 8:29pmJust another lying Democrat that hides their real self, tells voters what they will give them and once elected we see them for who they really are. SOUND FAMILIAR?
Report Post »OlderCowGirl
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 8:35pmOMG…I’m going to throw up…
Talk about a bunch of screwed up people! I’m “attracted” to murder upon occasion when I hate someone who destroyed my life…but that doesn’t mean I follow through with my thoughts and put it into action! How sick humans can be. Don’t they (the gay community) realize that it’s not really natural to have sex with the opposite sex? What if everyone did it? It wouldn’t be too many years and the whole planet would die out and no more people. Is that what the gay community wants? No people left on the planet? But then they do seem to need the non-gay folks to make babies for them.
Now that I think of it… no people…better for the animals, fish, birds and reptiles and the whole planet. Please God, if we do run out of people and you have to start over again…would you please make your new people less selfish? Oh…just think of it…no people…no global warming…no human torture…no hate…no human perversions…reduced noise…planet healing. Maybe that‘s God’s new plan…people self destruct and He starts all over again. Great idea…okay…I take everything back.
Report Post »Mojoron
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 8:38pmMy Dog is pansexual, she like both men and women and she’ll pee on anything that moves. I just wondering……Is she a Texas State Representative?
Report Post »loriann12
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 8:48pmIt’s called just caring about your own personal pleasures…what ever satisfies you. It’s the opposite of being Religious. I look more favorable on Muslims than I do on her.
Report Post »Mil-Dot
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 8:50pmMan 68, that is exactly what I was going to post. Exactly.
Report Post »jhaydeng
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 8:54pmI’m so confused!
Report Post »tshnh123
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 8:57pmI am almost as confused as she must be
Report Post »jzs
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 9:06pmShe brought the subject up, so I can‘t fault you for the comments you’ve made.
Personally, I don’t know why she brought it up and why any of you care. Why the prurient fascination in what someone across the country does in the privacy of their own home? Why is it the right wing Tea Partiers are so fascinated by what happens in people’s personal lives? You’re really concerned about their salvation? Yeah, sure, and you read Playboy for the interesting articles.
Does she fight for the district she represents? Funny that it doesn’t cross a single tiny mind here about how well she does the job she was elected to do.
Of course, you don’t care about that. Ya looked at the photo and it got your hormones flowing, which has affected your brain function. Weird.
Report Post »P C BE DAMNED
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 9:25pmThey want you to become confused as to who they are by all the different names. Don’t buy it. A homosexual will move on to every thing unatural once they have made the jump from natural to perversion. Thats why these 1% are the molesters of 99% of the children. We are not buying what you are selling. We have your number and you really don’t throw around that much weight as we are learning every day. We learned much with that Chick Fil A thing a couple weeks ago. You are some nasty sh1t eaters. I thank God he has shown me about the sodomite ways even a straight person engages in and how to get it out of there lives. If you are practicing sodomite ways, please ask God to get it out of your life. I do.
Report Post »lentil
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 9:56pmI picture a long line of “Gender Spectrum” people waiting for her to “Date” them. This dissection of her personal sexuality at her own hands mind you, is not just cheap.
Report Post »gragums
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 10:00pmWe‘ve always skanks like her ’TRYSEXUALS’. They will TRY anything SEXUAL!!
Report Post »ScratInTheHat
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 10:14pmAnd the normalization of perversion continues!
Wolfgang the Gray
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 10:44pmBut how does she relate with horses? Down the slippery slope we go….
Report Post »NancyBee
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 10:51pmOkay………..whatever
Report Post »Hobbs57
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 10:59pmI married a Lesbian while I was in the service, quite sure she was only confused and I could switch her back to the other team. She explained her “love” for women to me, but her explanation was purely sexual. SHe explained, she never knew an orgasm like she had when she was with a woman, and this was the evidence that she rooted her choice to be Lesbian. Being the drug addict I was at the time, I explained to her, when I smoked weed, it got me high. It was the only high I knew until one day I smoked crack. Now, weed did little in the way of getting me high as compared to the crack, so the crack was my knew found love… that is, until Heroin came along… ?? If I would have never tried crack or heroin, then the only high I would know was the high weed gave me and the would be the best high. Same for her, if never having had sex with a woman, then she would have only known sex with men. If I had never tried drugs at all, I would have found that thrill or lust playing soccer or having sex or somewhere else. It took me many years later, sober of course, to learn that what I was chasing would never fill my heart and soul, each was only a temporary fix, until the next high came along. IN early sobriety, I definitely confused lust with love. I remember my girl coming over, and how much I “LOVED” her, until we had sex, then I could care less if she went home. Why ?? Because it was only lust, a drug. Just like drugs, I had to remain abstinent early on. LGBTP‘s are lust addict’
Report Post »mr.goodvibe
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 10:59pmiblvingd- she just felt the need to let everyone know even though no one was asking. Issues!
Report Post »Gorp
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 11:43pmSo basically she‘s saying that she’ll “do” anything that moves?
Report Post »gosutag
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 12:59am@SILLYFRESHNESS:
So are you against homosexuals? Because if you are then you just contradicted yourself. Saying they let their sexuality define them, but if you’re a homophobe then you define people by their sexuality.
@MOTHEROFTHREE:
What the hell? Where’d you get your brain from? A piegon? Your logic makes no sense, therefore illogical.
@WATERSRPEOPLE:
Report Post »So, you’ve only had sex to make children? You either have a lot of children or have little to no sex then right?
mattmo79
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 1:08amTMI Freak, who cares what perversions you like in your sex life. Keep it to yourself and your weirdo partners!
Report Post »WATER-THE-TREE
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 2:00amWho cares what these fruitloops are into??
Report Post »pschlentz
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 2:04amThis chick is a mess, and unfortunately, proud of it.
Report Post »What is happening in our Country?
Shackleford
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 2:19amIn other words, she’s a Democrat who wants to screw everyone. In other other words, she’s an ordinary Democrat.
Report Post »HappyStretchedThin
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 3:13am@ JZS
Report Post »Am I mistaken, or do you frequently post about how idiotic it is for people who believe God may have had something to do with creation to be in government because the policies they make are based on faulty science.
If my memory serves that’s your opinion.
Which makes you hypocritical (again) on this point too.
She’s unfit for representation (p.s. representing =/= fighting for, which would be advocacy) because her theory of the very basics of biology is flawed and would lead to detrimental experimentation in the policy arena.
Sociologists did important work helping people understand that there was a social component to gender: that short hair and pants wasn’t biologically programmed into the male DNA. But gender theorists nowadays somehow think there’s NO biological component to gender, and that it’s ALL social conditioning that boys play with GI Joes and girls with Barbies.
She wouldn’t uphold basic laws on family values and structures because of her faulty beliefs. I bet 98% (i.e. the entire non-lgbt population) of her constituency now has serious buyer’s remorse.
Thatsitivehadenough
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 3:34amShe just sounds like a predatory pervert to me. Anything and anyone anytime any time anywhere anyhow. See # 26 of the 45 goals of communism in America: https://onceuponatimeinthewest1.wordpress.com/45-goals-of-communism/
Report Post »Twobyfour
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 5:08am@JZS, get of your high horse.
“Why the prurient fascination in what someone across the country does in the privacy of their own home?”
Actully, I‘d say that nearly all here don’t give a flying fig about what she does in the privacy of her home. Emphasis on privacy (meaning she’d keep it to herself and hers).
But noooo. She has to bullhorn it into the whole world. And that momet, it became a public matter. You can’t have it both ways.
What is her rationalization? She knows deep in her heart that she is deviant ( = subtstantial deviation from the mean). Her deviancy is not a result of a biological prerogatives, but simply a consequence of conscious (and possibly also some subconscious) choices. She desn’t want to feel that she is on the far edge of the bell curve. Hence she is trumpetting it in your face, hoping she’ll find more of hers, or that she may sway some impressionable induhvidual or more to follow in her footsteps. IOW, she’d like to form a Club Deviant. For no other than her very selfish reasons. She does not consider any unintended consequences, which is that any society that allows hedonistic solipsism to become mainstream is digging its own grave in a short (historically speaking) order.
Of course, there is a program produced by the Frankfurt School, some seventy years ago. Many people don’t have any idea that the intent of spreading deviancy into mainstream had the precise goal in mind–the destruction of the society.
Report Post »wynnsjammer
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 5:15am“Democrats”, the “Gifts” that keep on “Giving”.
Report Post »Ray2447
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 5:46amOne of my college professors told me (for real), “Only Republicans can have any kind of sexual morality scandal, because Democrats never profess to have any sexual morality in the first place.” At first, I was taken aback at the licentiousness inherent in that statement, but now it totally makes sense to me.
Any person considering a future run for pubic office on a Democrat party platform, don’t forget to add this to your campaign slogan, “AND AS A DEMOCRAT I HAVE THE SEXUAL MORALITY OF AN ALLY CAT.”
Report Post »KarinS
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 6:38amWho is she trying to convince???
Report Post »Tankboy2adfwd
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 6:43am@T-2. What do you mean “She’s in the wrong business?“ It seems the definition of a ”pansexual” means she will screw anyone and everyone. Politician is the PERFECT career choice for her.
Report Post »lookatthefactsjack
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 8:05amwe used to call women with this type of proclivity a nymphomaniac
Report Post »VigilantGuardShark
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 8:21amSo basically she‘s admitting to being a freaky slut with no scruples about ’doing it’ with anone of anything that catches her eye. Whoa dude! That’s just sick. I suppose’ll be paying
Report Post »1592
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 8:28amI don’t care what people do in their own lives.
Report Post »I DON’T WANT TO HEAR ABOUT IT!
Keep you skirt down or your pants up whatever you think you are.
DON’T CARE ! ! ! !
CABERNETQHS
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 8:42amAnother dem with no morals…I’m shocked!
Report Post »Macman1138
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 9:25amWell kids, she’s saying that she will have any kind of with anyone as long as they are Human, live, dead or just plain perverted. Maybe animals and objects too.
Report Post »It would be interesting to see “her” voter base.
They will say we shouldn’t judge and that “It’s just a different kind of love.”
jzs
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 9:38amHappyStretchedThin asks, “Am I mistaken, or do you frequently post about how idiotic it is for people who believe God may have had something to do with creation to be in government because the policies they make are based on faulty science?”
You’re mistaken, or you haven’t understood my posts, or you take ideas you can’t refute and distort them beyond recognition so that they seem more ridiculous to you. Or some combination.
Of course I believe in evolution and don’t find it incompatible with religion unless you assume the Bible is completely literal.
To believe the Earth is 10,000 years old for example, you’d have to disbelieve the findings of geology, physics (carbon dating), astronomy, cosmology and other sciences. Few educated Christians can perform than mind-bending feat. And I‘m not sure what makes you think I’m not Christian – I’ve always been deliberately vague on that point.
I love the idea of having Christians in government, provided that are motivated by the teachings of Christ. But they aren’t. On Sunday they say the poor and meek are the children of God, and on Monday they are bums who deserve no help, so that we can instead redistribute more money to the “richest among us.”
Report Post »Roberto G. Vasquez
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 9:57amIt’s instructive to note that the vast majority of Pervs are Democrat!
Report Post »ERP
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 10:10am@Walkabout
Point well taken :-)
Report Post »jonnydoe
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 10:25amPansexual simply means she’ll take on anyone, anything, anytime. Male, female, horse, dog, sheep, tree, spatula……
Report Post »Wayner
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 11:12amDoes this new word “pansexual” also include dogs, horses and children?
Report Post »dublinthewagons
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 11:22amEnjoy your first, last & final term. Texas deserves better.
Report Post »Sirmagic
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 11:29amPeople are as they are.
I don’t care what you do in your bedroom, what would matter to me is how well you do the job. There really was no need for her to make her sexual preferences a public issue. Now that is it out there, let’s take 5 seconds smile sweetly and get back to focusing on the relevant issues which matter.
SirMagic
Report Post »Honestas innocentia honorque super alia omnia.
YouCantBSerious
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 11:36amSo is she ruling out dogs and ponies? I hope so for the sake of the dogs and ponies.
Report Post »shiftingcargo
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 11:37amOf course she is a Democrat. Listen to all Democrat women rail about this alleged war on women, their desire for free abortions and free contraceptives. Democrat women are more concerned with what is between their legs than what is between their ears.
Report Post »StGabes
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 12:07pmWhat the hell is wrong with people???? I don’t get it!!! Are people that confused? People need to be taught values and morals…. where are hers? I don’t think she was taught any!!!
Report Post »warrior21
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 12:40pmShe’s pansexual , great… now she can hookup with Jerry Sandusky!
Report Post »BuzzardSays
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 12:56pmHoly cow! Wait a second she might dig on those poor innocent creatures for something other than hamburger and milk. I don’t get seomone who is so in tuned with their own propensity to rut with anyone, anybody, or anything and call that NOR-MAL.
I call her normal…NUTS but she would be shoving a handful somewhere that might lead towards a tree growing from her behind should those NUTS sprout.
Report Post »rambosharley
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 2:03pmSo, in other words, she’s attracked to FREAKS!
Report Post »gbo
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 3:30pmWhat? Misrepresenting oneself until after election? She’s in the right business – until the coming paradigm shift arrives.
Report Post »Until then, can we look forward to her coming out as an omni-sexual after another successful election cycle? One can only hope. Let’s see, that means nothing will be off-limits – living things, non-living things, once living things, things with no things that aren’t things…
HateTN
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 4:00pmSo in other words, this woman will get with anything?
Report Post »HappyStretchedThin
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 4:14pm@JZS,
Report Post »My deepest apologies. I fully recant. I‘ve apparently mixed you up with others with whom I’ve verbally sparred on this forum as far as your stance on creationism goes.
And in the same breath I thank you for once again proving me right that you are an utter hypocrite.
You begin with:”You’re mistaken, or you haven’t understood my posts, or you take ideas you can’t refute and distort them beyond recognition so that they seem more ridiculous to you. Or some combination.” And then you immediately claim anyone who doesn’t subscribe to the failed theory of redistribution of wealth via the tax code is somehow anti-charity and hypocrites themselves. Far from it: leaving people more of their own means with which to have Christian compassion on the true needy is and always has been the most effective method of providing for those needy ones. Both giver and receiver are personally blessed because personal sacrifice and personal humility are connected in a personal act of selflessness. Obama’s method removes the personal from the equation, accomplishes a trickle of resources by forcing all to give, and then picking the groups who receive. It blesses neither giver nor receiver, and leaves us with a 40+ year old war on poverty that hasn’t changed a thing for the better.
You sir, are the distorter here.
p.s. Solyndra wasn’t a very effective “charity” either, when it comes to how Obama’s spent our “donations”.
Scaz
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 4:24pmWow, I learned something new today and it added absolutely nothing meaningful to my life. As a matter of fact, we’re all a little dumber now that we know what a “Pansexual” is and how screwed up some people can get in this world.
God bless us all, everyone.
Report Post »gac1218
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 6:06pm@ IB
Report Post »If homosexuality were natural and normal then why do our God given sexual parts indicate otherwize. Anyone that believes this is normal instead of the greatest of perversions is completely deceived. Your rectum is designed for one thing and it’s not homosexual activity. If women were with women and men were with men then we would all die out in a couple of generations for lack of proper breeding. It is an emotional disease promulgated by improper sexual acts on children, or out of order family structures. It is the result of sin. In my opinion, it is insane to expect someone with a perverted sexual preference to not be perverted in other thinking and reasoning processes. Good luck you Texans in her district as she drags you right in to the muck pit of her demented life with her. Oh, and by the way homosexulity is against God’s law, and you can fully expect with the acceptance of this, it’s not long before pedophilia and beastiality follow. It happened in Rome in this order so expect it here. Wake up people and stand for truth before it is to late.
EZ_patriot
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 6:31pmActually, she’s in the perfect business. Since politicans are nothing more than whores, she can cover all bases! Although I think the word “slut” fits just as well as “pansexual”…
Report Post »dsinsg
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 6:44pmWhy do we need to know this? Do your business in private and leave us out of it!
Report Post »Jfelb
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 9:12pmAdd your comments
Report Post »castell
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 9:37pmThey should go back to the original term they use to call these
Report Post »type of people with abhorrent and ridiculous behaviors….ROMANS !!!!
(for people not knowing what I mean..the did all sorts of stuff with everyone and anything, even animals.)
sophillyjimmy
Posted on August 15, 2012 at 12:32amSo she will do anything that has a heartbeat, a woman, man, transvesdite, dog, horse, cow, bull, sheep, rams, kangaroos and she is proud of this behavior?
Report Post »Great to know that our government reps don’t care what they do with their private parts.
At least Obama is only a bisexual, but then again looking at Michelle, he is also into gorillas and of course Larry Sinclair.
Ded-Bred
Posted on August 15, 2012 at 3:50amPansexual? I always thought that term was referring to a sexual attraction to cookware; esp. frying pans….
Report Post »which put a completely dffe
”””””””””””
karencole
Posted on August 15, 2012 at 7:10amOk so the immoral of the story is….that she will have sex with literally anyone? Boy, she must just feel so much better now that that is out in the open….wtf??!
Report Post »Quester55
Posted on August 15, 2012 at 11:27amLeave it to one of those Democrats to coin a New word for “ S I N ”, Thereby Calming down their Frustrated Souls, and Freeing themselves of such Old Concepts, as ” Love, Family, GOD, FAITH, Honesty, ETC…”, You know, those Old things that WE Poor Lost Souls Still Cling too, Just like Our Forefather’s Did.
Report Post »These N.W.O. Nuts will be the Death of us all.
RSHLUVER
Posted on August 16, 2012 at 1:24amObama said that Texas will go blue someday.
Report Post »SacredHonor1776
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:40pmPansexual female = nymphomaniac?
Report Post »Apple Bite
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:47pmYes. And Yes.
Report Post »TEIN
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:48pmOr maybe Try-sexual??? try anything….
Report Post »The Jewish Avenger
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:57pmpansexual: someone who gets off on lying about herself then “panders” herself and her sick demented friends through self glorification to the masses.
that or she likes making her man pancakes and gets aroused over it….
Nah, this is a Dem… the first sounds more appropriate.
But the second would be interesting! (LOL)
Report Post »Taxpayer550
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:59pmHow about an age-old term: Sexual Deviant
Report Post »HigherRoad
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:04pmPan means “all.” Does she mean sexuality in every sense of the word–beastiality included, sex with children? Is this the kind of representative they want in Texas? I hope voters will remember this woman and what she represents on election day.
Report Post »Kaoscontrol
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:15pmSex with Pans is unnatural– In fact, sex with any dishes including Pans, Pots, forks and spoons should be against the law… though I must say that I’ve seen some soup bowls that I found very attractive!
Report Post »FlyingLow
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:26pmwith no moral compass I’m surprised she left out horses.
Report Post »OUTRIDER WRITER
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:29pm@APPLE BITE
Report Post »yes and yes; … or
no and no;
yes and no;
no and yes;
no today, but yes tomorrow;
and finally,
if we’re talking about a no-no, then yes-yes
Dustoff
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:31pmShould the dogs & cat’s in her neighbor hood be worried?
Report Post »oldguy77
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:39pmI have never heard of a pansexual but I do know what a pervert or a deviate is.From your description I would assume you fit into one of those catagories.To keep it simple “GOD” made two sex”s one has a period and one does not.You decide.
Report Post »HigherRoad
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 3:25pmKAOSCONTROL – Great! Although I wouldn’t eliminate those (pans) from her “bucket list.”
Report Post »Bluebonnet
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 4:01pmYikes, I’d be afraid of diseases she carries doing it with anything and everything, dirty or not.
Report Post »You decent people in Austin, don’t get hooked up this this thing, or you may get it.
VRW Conspirator
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 5:19pmYes…my thoughts exactly…a Nympho…a Sex Addict would be the best term…whomever, whenever, and whatever gets her off she will jump on…man, woman, man posing as woman, woman posing as man…what about a “sweet transexual from transvestite Transylvania”..??
Report Post »VRW Conspirator
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 5:20pmerr… that should be “sweet transvestite from transexual Transylvania..” oops…
Report Post »Twobyfour
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 7:11pmYou know, she’s got the perfect qualification for a junior hi teacher
Report Post »OlefromMN
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 10:37pm“Pansexual” = “swinger” .
At least that is what is was called in the ’70s
Report Post »michael48
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 10:04amshe’s a typical dem-wit…clueless and willing to provide proof…
Report Post »Redwood Elf
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 11:29amSo on her application forms, under “Sex” she writes “Lots, please!”
They used to call it being a complete slut.
Report Post »castell
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 9:38pmlol, they should just call her a modern ROMAN woman. It would explain everything with one word.
Report Post »JACKTHETOAD
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:39pmShe’ll have a hard time buying him shoes, with those cloven hooves and everything. At least she’s got a place for him to keep his pipes. I‘d bet she just can’t be sated, the little nymphet.
Report Post »biohazard23
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:11pmHeh heh heh…. Hope she’s got some wide open, uh, pastures for “grazing”… Does he like that sort of thing? He IS half goat and all… Tee hee!!
Report Post »JACKTHETOAD
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 5:30pm…now, young lady, about that Goose and Cran…I’ve gotta run for some limes…:)
Report Post »Zipit
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 9:21amSing it!!! LGBTMOUSE! Or is it gerbil, goat, donkey, Barney Frank,,, Chastity Bono perhaps. OMG
Report Post »obumma
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:39pmThis is just liberal-speal for the age-old term “skank”
Report Post »The Jewish Avenger
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:58pmPffft!!!! Clean up on aisle 7! LOL
Report Post »Bluebonnet
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 4:17pmRUSH was exactly right. And so is this one.
Report Post »RANGER1965
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:38pmYou can almost see where this will lead down the road.
You know how it‘s not enough to tell a gay activist that you don’t care what he does in the privacy of his bedroom. Now you have to celebrate it with him, and be happy for him. If you don’t then you are bigot and a homophobe.
In the same way being straight or gay will become a form of myopic discrimination against those enlightened individuals who are Pansexual.
There will be pressure to identify yourself as Pansexual, even if your not to avoid being labelled a bigot.
Satan is ratcheting up his battle plan here in America. He’s doing everything to possible to destroy this next generation.
Report Post »The Sergeant Major
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:17pmRANGER-Remember the freak shows from the 70-80ies. Oh, for the days of bra burnings and war protesters. As the queer community keeps repeating their talking points do they really think we will fall for it?
Satan will pervert anything that will cause the fall of man, or woman or men that think there women or dogs that think there men or …………
Report Post »Michigander
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:52pmyup, I know some gay people I like, but I do not like the gaystapo. I don’t want to be told how to think, I’m not sure about gay marriage, and I‘m not sure it’s a good idea to let them adopt children. I think we should ask their kids in about 20 years. Until then, I want the right to have my doubts.
Report Post »pissantno.10
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 7:05pmi dont know about satan i heard he left town too. these people are to wierd for him
Report Post »TASS50
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 12:32amRanger I agree with you. I don‘t care what they call me I won’t go against Gods will. We all have free will and what we do with it as this women is she has to face judgement, all of them. We will all suffer in this world with these people with their bizzare behavior..I am tired of hearing about who is Gay. What does it have to do with tea in China. I can’t believe Texas would have someone in there like that, another Barney Franks. Now he is disgusting lol!! I think I’ll leave the Democratic Party to the Independence.
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:38pmAnother twisted sister. Where do the fools that vote for these freaks come from?
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:39pmProbably the same swampland that Reid and Pelosi come from in some alternate universe or dimension.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:44pmI would have guessed Austin but it says El Paso.
Report Post »ZBP
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:03pmWell, she was a dishonest about herself while campaigning.
Report Post »FlyingLow
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:29pmpeople with no moral compass are usually voted in by people with no moral compass.
Report Post »OUTRIDER WRITER
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:31pm@GONZO
Report Post »And I was thinking Texas Panhandle.
Stupid me…..
dejavu43
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 3:42pmJerk & SnowLeopard: Where do they come from? In many cases, the direct result of voter fraud. Just look at Nevada–perfect example. The rest of it is pure laziness when the electorate–at whatever level–fails to do their homework. You can find examples of “How in the HELL did this person get elected” syndrome everywhere.
Report Post »Jezreel
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 4:14pmI thought that a Pansexual is a woman who has a fettish for kitchen utensiles.
Report Post »Twobyfour
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 7:47pmPans? Doesn’t compute…Oh! Panhandles!
Report Post »The_Cabrito_Goat
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 8:57pmEl Paso? I guess anything can pass through her
*booooo!*
Report Post »UnCL3
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:37pmho hum, another lib reprobate…she’s probaly attracted to toasters as well…
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:14pmPan Appliance?
Report Post »oneshiner
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 6:44pmA toaster? Is she smart enough to unplug it? I think I‘ll keep my dog on a leash while I’m in Texas next time. Just in case………………He‘s clean and I don’t want him to catch anything from the pan.
Report Post »starman70
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:36pmThis is the best LIB-SPEAK I have ever heard. Liberals coin new terms every day to obfuscate what they are really saying. Here you have a prime example!
Report Post »Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:36pmIs it really this slow of a newsday at the Blaze?
Report Post »bikerr
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:49pm@Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve—–b-i-t-c-h, b-i-t-c-h, b-i-t-c-h!
Report Post »65Mustang
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:29pmIf ever there was a sick b-i-t-c-h this is the one.
Report Post »JACKTHETOAD
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 5:32pmI dunno STANG. Maybe if you boil her for 10 or 15 min. Just to be sure.
Report Post »sawbuck
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:36pmThat sounds Like a Fancy way of saying slut..!
Report Post »I wonder if she was born that way…?
HKS
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:43pmSlut be accurate.
Report Post »betsyyoung
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:02pmI’m with you on slut! Good grief, is she actually a real person! Her family must be so delighted with her comments! Blech! She should be working for Larry Flynt!
Report Post »formidable_foe
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 4:55pmLet me get this straight….
Report Post »After she hits it over the head with a frying pan, she has sex with it?
DrIvey
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:35pmThese people who insist on only having sex with other humans disgust me. How exclusive is that? I thought we all agreed that a bigger tent and celebrating diversity were GOOD things. Personally, I can be attracted to a man, to a woman, to a man who thinks he’s a woman, as well as a comely gibbon, a fluffy kitty, or even a Hot Pocket if it’s the right temperature. Am I a better person than Ms. Gonzalez? I wouldn’t say that, but yes, yes, I am!
Report Post »lakey98
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:48pmReplay of the day award winner.
Report Post »The Jewish Avenger
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:00pm“Whatareyagonna pick” *DING* Hot Pockets!
BWAHAHAHAHA
Sorry… LOL
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:35pmPeter Pan better better watch his ass and his front!
Report Post »Granny58
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:18pmLol!
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:35pmMary sounds confused,the perfect state for a nut job politician.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:54pmShe’s going to need to come up with a flag Slayer. The gays already took the rainbow… any suggestions?
Report Post »The Jewish Avenger
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:02pmSomething with a question mark in it seems appropriate…
Report Post »SingerGuy
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:02pmThey already have a flag, and it’s a dandy!
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/80/Pansexual_flag.PNG
Report Post »The Jewish Avenger
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:05pm/facepalm …
It has a flag and a definition
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pansexuality
Report Post »The Jewish Avenger
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:06pmDandy… now that’s an appropriate word…
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:18pmI get it now, it’s so confusing that they now have TWO flags!
Report Post »TexasHunter
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 3:09pm@ PROGRESSIVE I seriously think you are talking about California!! Texas we try to weed out the PAN and DEMS & LIBS. Don’t think she will have a second TERM !
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 3:27pmGonzo I think I found the flag for our confused congresswoman.
http://fc02.deviantart.net/fs7/i/2005/242/2/9/Pirate_Flag_by_ST4TIK.jpg
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 5:05pmPROGRESSIVESLAYER, Bwahahahahahaha, But, here is a better one.
Report Post »https://marketplace.secondlife.com/p/Gay-Pirate-flag-Jolly-Roger-Gay-Pride-Rainbow-copymod/629762
RJJinGadsden
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 5:07pmPROG, With this guy under the flag.
Report Post »http://vikingkitties.blogspot.com/2009_04_01_archive.html
RJJinGadsden
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 5:10pmDang, did not post the pic that I had pulled up. If you tag the link above, just scroll down to a familiar face in a pirate’s hat.
Report Post »txannie
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:35pmOMG….excuse me while I go yak….
Report Post »jackact
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:35pmMmm….pansexual?
Report Post »Errrr…..Janet Napolitano?
LadyLibertykicksASS
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:50pmHmmmmm….. Me thinks you have a point there…..lol !!!!!
Report Post »Minarchian
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:13pmI think Napolitano is asexual.
I mean…who would touch that?
Report Post »pissantno.10
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 7:11pmya im there with ya been wondering about her no not realy
Report Post »Crazy Times
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:33pmI think these are better words to describe her:
Vomitsexual
Report Post »Sickosexual
VanceUppercut
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 2:56pmQuit talking like that about your sister.
Report Post »3monkeysmomma
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:33pmwtf????????????????????????????????????????????????????? :(
Report Post »momrules
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:33pmSo what she is saying is that she will have intercourse with anything. Does she own animals?
Report Post »txannie
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:42pmI thought I was done yaking until I read this…OMG squared….
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:01pmThink of it this way, she‘s a Kennedy born in a Gonzalez’s body.
Report Post »The Jewish Avenger
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:04pmOnly the worms that entered her brain…
Cue in Pink Floyd music….
Comfortably… pansexual….
Report Post »Tri-ox
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:32pmNo one should have sex with pans – it just isn’t normal.
Report Post »3monkeysmomma
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:34pmlol
Report Post »Constructionist
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:41pmActually, she probably saves a lot of money on lubricants because of the teflon
Report Post »GJPinks
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:45pmHow about Oven Mitts?
Report Post »Don’t forget REAL unemployment U6 is 15%
ForMyKidsVA
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:32pmBasically, she’ll hop in bed with anything and anyone. I think Rush has a name for that.
Report Post »canadianlady
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:34pmLOL! Good call!
Report Post »Michigander
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:56pmDesperate.
Report Post »wisebeyond
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:32pmWait… What?
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:39pmShe likes Pan. You know, half goat, half man, plays the flute? She’s a big Jethro Tull fan.
Report Post »kittybe62
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:47pmJethro Tull…HAHAHAHAHAHA
Report Post »JACKTHETOAD
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 5:09amLeave Ian alone. He’s a lobster farmer now, Gonz. Oh no! Not lobsters too! Aahhhh…
Report Post »www.TopTheNews.com
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:31pmThings are getting complicated in America…
To each their own!
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:31pmSo basically she’ll f*** anything that walks. Nice.
Report Post »HKS
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:39pmMaybe walking is not a requirement.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:46pmYou make a good point HKS. I am being bipedaphobic. I’ll work on that.
Report Post »Spark
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:48pmI think “anything that walks” limits her pansexual horizons.
Report Post »Steve28
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:50pmYes so now we have to add a P to LGBT? This is getting confusing. Gee, I wonder if the people knew how screwed up this gal was they would have voted for her. Now if they try and get the vote overturned theyt will all go to jail for discrimiantion or would they for a Pan?
Report Post »JayCee
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 2:24pmProbably engages in solo sex more often than with anyone in her pansexual category.
Report Post »RightThinking1
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 3:19pmGonz,
Report Post »“Anything that walks”? I’m assuming that anything capable of crawling or slithering qualifies also. Handy, since she is a Left/Liberal.
Tankertony
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 9:04amMaybe, also, anything that flys, swims, or slithers. How neat!
Report Post »So open-minded, these progressives…..
Listen_then_think
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:31pmWhat it means is she has no idea who she is and stands for nothing, has no values or character. All it is, is a promiscuous sex fiend.
Report Post »LB
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:39pmShe is just messed up in the identity lobe/area of her brain. You are not born that way, you choose that way. I’m so tired of people just doing whatever they want and then wanting the rest of us to be ok with it. Keep your personal stuff personal
Report Post »vox_populi
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:30pmGood for her. Kind of a brave move, I feel, especially living in Texas.
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:36pmEspecially what, VOX?
Report Post »Obamammy
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:41pmNext you can stand up for dog sex, child sex, book sex and sex with caterpillars.
Stick it, salad tosser.
Report Post »ForMyKidsVA
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:42pmAs long as the Texans hide their goats you’re right, her pan-ishness shouldn’t be a problem.
Report Post »IMCHRISTIAN
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:48pmYou don’t have to be brave you have to be wrongdoer to go against God Will.
Report Post »N37BU6
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 1:50pmYes, Obamammy… because allowing one thing means you’ll allow anything. We’re an all-or-nothing species.
Tragic story: There was a pizza place down the road from me. Did well for years… until someone added pasta to the menu. Before long, they were serving dog feces, vomit, and toenail clippings.
If you allow one thing on the menu, you have to allow everything. It’s just a fact!
Report Post »FlowerBell
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 5:20pm“Kind of a brave move”
Report Post »Speaking publicly about your person sexual proclivities, especially when they are of a deviant nature and NO ONE was asking in the first place is not brave. It is classless and vulgar, but not brave.
justasurvivor
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 10:10pmMy kids asked me what I thought of gay marriage, and I told them.
In my explanation, though, I told them, “If your idea of intimacy is to do whatever with anybody and anything, you have a much bigger problem than anything relating to gay marriage.”
Now my kids have a model of that lifestyle. They can now examine that in the light of Biblical truth.
The things we’ve thought were going on in the progressive movement? We don’t even know the surface of it. They’re defending/attacking on such a shallow attempt by us to expose them. This darkness goes MUCH deeper than most conservatives/Christians could ever imagine.
Report Post »OlderCowGirl
Posted on August 13, 2012 at 10:59pmI submit that the only reason she “came out of the closet ” is for the publicity. Why else would someone broadcast their sexual preference(s)to the whole planet? She/He/It is hunting the old spotlight. And I’ll bet it works for her. Only trouble is…one day this sexual freedom thing won’t be popular anymore…and the cat’s out of the bag already. Now imagine her in another 20-30 years after she’s grown up and realizes she blew it years ago….not pun intended.o Who would want to touch her after many years of…you know.
Report Post »YouCantBSerious
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 11:40amVoice of what people? Why is it brave to broadcast who you have sex with?
Report Post »VanceUppercut
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 2:58pm@Obamammy
Yes, another intelligent conservative conflating gay sex with having sex with animals, or sex with kids.
Report Post »castell
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 9:35pmShe isn’t a texan, she is a Roman. History professors and authors and those that appeared on television would talk about how Romans did practically everything with anybody and anything. They would say this is what led to their downfall. This was before political correctness. There was no term for pansexual back then or whatever they were called. They were just called Roman and that was their stigma.
Report Post »redbone007
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 1:02amTake another look: http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2012/06/15/us/15TTElpaso.html
Report Post »jcizarter
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 4:11amI feel your pain. I think I would tell my daughter this, ” I would rather be in jail than around you!“ I would never speak to the ”female dog” again.
Report Post »Arizona Dude
Posted on August 14, 2012 at 2:48pmThat is better than feeling her PAN. ha! Ha!
Report Post »