Crime
Does Sandusky Hesitate When Costas Asks if He’s Sexually Attracted to Young Boys?
- Posted on November 15, 2011 at 12:19am by
Scott Baker
- Print »
- Email »
Jerry Sandusky was on the phone with Bob Costas on NBC’s Rock Center for a chilling and bizarre exclusive interview tonight.
Perhaps the strangest part of the interview came when Costas asked Sandusky if he was sexually attracted to young boys. Sandusky nervously responded:
“Sexually attracted? I enjoy young people. I love to be around them…I…I… but no I’m not sexually attracted to young boys.”
BI transcribes more of the quotes here.





















Submitting your tip... please wait!
HTuttle
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 1:04pmHe had to check that he didn’t have an erection when he answered.
Report Post »johnannegalt
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 8:17pmWho does this? Sick people. Really, covering up rape is nearly as disgusting as the action. http://markamerica.com/2011/11/10/how-could-they-cover-up-the-rape-of-children/
Report Post »Redscot
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 11:29amAnyone who worships a man who was a pedophile deserves nothing from me. To me, they are no less than Paterno allowing Sandusky to continue to be in this world unarrested by real police, not campus rent-a-cops. He failed his human duty to stop the abuse. Paterno told campus security and they took Sandusky’s keys away told him not to come to the school.
Report Post »The entire football team was revered as holy to the players, families, school, town, alumni and the sport of football. Penn State would no more allow any whiff of child sexual abuse come to light than it would cancel the game last weekend. Football to them is that important. Child sexual abuse is minor to them instead.
Even the judge who gave such low bail and conditions to that bail is complicit. That judge is a contributor and volunteer at Sandusky’s charity – the charity which supplied him vicitms. The town, police, and prosecutor are complicit because they did not arrest the man back in the 90′s when this first came to light. Anyone who makes excuses for the graduate student (now coach) who failed in his human duty to yank Sandusky away from the kid he was sodomizing, is complicit.
Football at Penn State must end for at least 5 years. The players should be allowed to stay in school as long as they keep thier grades up. Kill the entire football set-up for at least 5 years. That is a fraction of the time the entire school allowed this to go on. Football was a major money maker for the school. Let that be the punishmen
Redscot
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 11:27amAnyone who worships a man who was a pedophile deserves nothing from me. To me, they are no less than Paterno allowing Sandusky to continue to be in this world unarrested by real police, not campus rent-a-cops. He failed his human duty to stop the abuse. Paterno told campus security and they took Sandusky’s keys away told him not to come to the school.
Report Post »The entire football team was revered as holy to the players, families, school, town, alumni and the sport of football. Penn State would no more allow any whiff of child sexual abuse come to light than it would cancel the game last weekend. Football to them is that important. Child sexual abuse is minor to them instead.
Even the judge who gave such low bail and conditions to that bail is complicit. That judge is a contributor and volunteer at Sandusky’s charity – the charity which supplied him vicitms. The town, police, and prosecutor are complicit because they did not arrest the man back in the 90′s when this first came to light. Anyone who makes excuses for the graduate student (now coach) who failed in his human duty to yank Sandusky away from the kid he was sodomizing, is complicit.
Football at Penn State must end for at least 5 years. The players should be allowed to stay in school as long as they keep thier grades up. Kill the entire football set-up for at least 5 years. That is a fraction of the time the entire school allowed this to go on. Football was a major money maker for the school. Let the loss of that inco
LIBS-ARE-DINGLEHEADS
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 8:44amGuess what you self-righteous, throw out the Constitution wanna-be FBI dimwits…..
This type of behavior has been going on for eons…and will continue.
Ponificate all you want here if it makes you “feel good”. The TRUTH is that some adults will have sex with kids – no matter what.
The PROBLEM is that YOU dingleheads think EVERYONE that has the sex offender “label” is the SAME.
Watch…..NEW LAWS governing EVERY sex offender nationwide, will be added to the ALREADY stupid, unprotective “LAWS” that are already in place.
Instead of ranting and raving about HOW STUPID you are………do some research……..
DRUNK DRIVERS GET A PASS………..AND THEY KILL!
Fools!
Report Post »Mogumbo Gono
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 6:48amSandusky is a poster boy for NAMBLA.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 7:10amAnd gay history month …… *coming* to a school near you
Report Post »seldomscene
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 7:19amI just heard a portion of the interview on the radio. Now I need another shower.
Report Post »Tower7_TRUTH
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 8:05amresearch the CPS and Child abuse
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwBBK7MOtDU
lillymckim
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 8:30amThis pedophile has “6” adopted children and has fostered many…
Report Post »Windwalker
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 6:20amRegarding this Sandusky story, there are stories flying (call them rumors, truth, fabrications or whatever) all over the internet that all of these young boys sexually violated were black, and I have yet to see or hear one of the major news medias even mention this. Either they are or they are not.
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 6:13am.
Report Post »Everyone who knew anything, needs to be in JAIL………………..
johnpaulkuchtajr
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 3:53amSad to report that 40 years of ignoring the rights of the unborn has resulted in a broad class of individuals who can justify ignoring the rights of children. Child rape, according to the twisted segment of our population, isn’t so bad when you consider the 50,000 individuals per year who are slaughtered for the convenience of others. Didn’t good people see this unintended consequence coming down the track?
Tha same folks who justify abortions will say that a public hanging is cruel and unusual punishment! If we were still administering speedy justice: a quick trial, conviction on the merits and public hangings, all the perverts would still have those urges; but, they’d be keeping it to themselves. There‘s nothing quite like the look on a man’s face who has just been hung. No black hoods allowed. Let the public see the twisted visage of evil.
In Sandusky’s case, I would personally buy new rope, tie a great hangman’s noose, and relish putting the noose over his head. The pulling of the lever should be reserved for the most brutalized of the boys he raped. That right of vengence could help salvage at least one of them from the torments he endured.
Yep, this is all real old school; but, we managed to conquer and bring a semblence of order to an entire continent. I’d say that the Wild West process of administering justice made its mark. There was no fear in the Penn State Board, Athletic Department staff or, obviously, Sandusky. Bring back the fear.
Report Post »Windwalker
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 6:33amAbortion is killing, plain and simple, but killing humans won’t stop with aborting viable fetuses. Once Obamacare sinks its ugly teeth into American society, stepped up euthanasia of the elderly will be the next move of the globalists, they are considered “useless eaters”, after most of them have spent 40+ years of their lives paying taxes into a corrupt system.
Report Post »azmomof6
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 2:41amI don’t know much about sports, so maybe this is a silly question, but why were there little boys showering at a college campus?
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 5:27amYou want to PC version, or the real version?
PC version. Sandusky was given an office after “retiring” so that he could continue to “mentor” young boys to help them on their way to adulthood.
Real version. Paterno and the Penn State Administration arrogantly flaunted the facilitation of a known pedophile because he held strong political sway in the the community, and was a good recruiting tool based on his ability to develop strong defenses, and bring in big donor dollars.
Analysis.
Joe Paterno knew that Sandusky was a freak, but he sold out the welfare of children in the search for coaching immortality. In my opinion, that makes him every bit as culpable as Sandusky, and probably moreso because he used Sandusky to recruit, which is an absolute NCAA violation, while knowing that the Second Mile charity was being used to exploit the perversions of old men who were unscrupulous criminals of the worst order. They pimped kids out, and stole their innocence, maybe even to the highest State ranking officials/politicians and donors and hushed things up to the point of killing a Prosecutor who was on to their perverse tendencies. Who also happened to be the ONLY person willing to investigate and seek justice.
Paterno like Sandusky (and all those found in league with them) deserves a cell with Brutus the girl maker at the State Penn.
Paterno can now proclaim, WE ARE, State Penn.
Report Post »On The Bayou
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 5:50amthe 10th amendment great post, what has happen there does not seem possible. How can a community have knowledge of these animals and do nothing for so mant years. Joe Paterno is in it neck deep.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 9:25am@ On The Bayou
———————————————————————————————————
I was recruited by several big time Basketball schools, and Penn State was one of them. I met Paterno on an official visit, and my dad was impressed with him. I wound up at Ohio State to play for O’Brien, but still came away from PSU with a generally positive reaction from the visit. Now what‘s known publicly makes me that God that I didn’t go there.
When I‘m not in the field working I’m usually volunteering my time for political causes, or mentoring young kids from the Pittsburgh area to Lexington, Ky, to Columbus, Ohio. From handicapped kids, to at risk kids, it’s one of the most rewarding of all things. I just can’t imagine someone doing something so vile to children, or allowing a known pedophile to operate on their watch.
This is going to get even uglier before the dust finally settles according to people I know who operate mentoring programs.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 2:28amDid Michael Jackson come back from the dead?
Report Post »NOT A CRAZY
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 1:52amHe absolutely hesitated and then gave that weird drawn out explanation that really said it all. This sick disgusting freak is an absolute pedophile and I hope he spends the rest of his life behind bars. Not only that but the people who went out of their way to cover this up should go to prison for the rest of their lives also.
Report Post »truemedia
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 1:51amThis is like listening to Seinfeld with george castansa is caught haing sex with the cleaning lady at work and says was that wrong? Oh Sandusky…Showering with boys is twisted not to even go to the sex with them!
Report Post »ohnomrbill
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 1:50amthis is so ugly to me. To have to discuss this issue is a sad reflection on the men in our society.
Report Post »Slowman101
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 1:28amHmmmmmmmmmmmm, maybe we should check and see if Jerry is a member of NAMBLA. it wouldn’t surprise me if he is. Freak.
Report Post »Bakko Bomma
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 1:21amWhat time is bedtime at Sanduskys house?
When the big hand touches the little hand.
Report Post »NOT A CRAZY
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 1:53amThat is sick, you stupid DA d-bag. Are you a pervert too?
Report Post »mlcblog
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 2:51amSick but funny.
Report Post »minorityconservative2
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 2:53amYou are a sicko! There is nothing funny about any of this and the fact you are making jokes makes you a cad. You need to go back to one of your liberal sites with your monkey face and stupid name trying to make it seem as if the people on this site are racists. Just leave you are evil!
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 6:48amLighten up everyone. Such humor is a way to deal with awful events. It doesn’t mean callousness. There is only so much tragedy and evil people can take in. Some vent off by making jokes, like nurses in burn wards who talk of their patient as “crispy critters”. Some vent off by attacking those who make jokes.
Report Post »Bakko Bomma
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 7:11pmSome people are just whiny ******* looking to be offended.
Report Post »glennrocks
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 1:06amKevin Jennings the office of safe and drug free school czar once praised NAMBLA..
Report Post »bignebraskan
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 12:58amWhy isn’t the board, who fired Paterno, being questioned for allowing a known sexual predator to troll the athletic facilities of Penn St since they knew about it in the 1990′s??? When the sexual allegations surfaced in the 90′s, they should have taken his keys away and forbid him from returning…but they didn’t. Wouldn’t that be the moral thing to do? Lot’s of blame to go around, I’d look at the board first…after Sandusky, of course.
Report Post »Eliasim
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 1:06amThe problem is that society and individuals are much too tolerant or afraid of exposing wickedness, and yet they are not tolerant of things they should be.
Report Post »Eliasim
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 1:13amCase in point: why do I have to tell people that women should be raising the children to the Father, because a woman isn’t as likely to crush the spirit of a child as she makes demands as much as the Father would, and it lets the children know where the mother stands with regards to the Father, and that the children know they can not play them against each other? Why do I have to tell people that women make or break nations? Because people are not tolerant of things they should be. They also haven’t been teaching these things for decades upon decades.
Report Post »mlcblog
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 2:52amI understand this was common knowledge so why is Paterno taking the fall?
Report Post »DRSAVAGE24
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 12:56amWhat if the guy is innocent? Consider our justice system in this country where you’re innocent until proven guilty. Look at how the mob has tried and convicted the guy in the court of public opinion. Joe Paterno’s good name has been forever tarnished.
For all I know the guy is guilty as sin, but what if he actually was innocent? Boy, I don’t like my chances too much in this country if at some future date I were falsely accused of a heinous crime. This country is turning into a mob. It won’t take much to get that mob to turn on a favorite target of the left, such as Jews or the “rich” if/when the dollar collapses and the economy tanks. The mob will run roughshod over innocent people who had the gall to work hard to earn an honest living.
Report Post »Eliasim
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 1:02amHe may be innocent, and that‘s why he’s going to trial.
Report Post »Eliasim
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 1:03amLook at it this way: your soul might be innocent and so it’s getting tried by the flesh.
Report Post »DRSAVAGE24
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 1:15amYeah…you may be right. It’s interesting the similarities between this story and the Cain harassment story. At this point is there really any evidence that Sandusky did what he’s accused of? The eye witness coach is pretty damning, but what if the coach is lying because of some grudge against Sandusky? Just like the Cain case it‘s his word against someone else’s. The difference is that the Cain case involved adult women and flimsy sexual harassment claims (like he mighta winked at her or something) while this involves rape of children. Frankly, I think people are scared to defend Paterno or Sandusky because if you defend their right to a fair trial, innocent until proven guilty, well then of course you must see nothing wrong with child rape. It sets a very bad precedent for anyone in the future who may be falsely accused of doing something awful.
Report Post »MinorityRightsAdvocate
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 1:32amDRSAVAGE24,
Report Post »It may not be a finding in a court of law, but the grand jury indictment is pretty full of very specific and graphic detail. The known victims count up to 8, and 7 of those gave very consistent testimony about a clear pattern of abuse. Now, if it were NOT reported for 14 years, no credible witnesses, a political motive as well as a financial one, then I’d see the comparison with the clear BS being used against Cain, but after reading the actual indictment, this one is very convincing as having merit. Then there response shows a clear effort to cover this up, with a clear motive, by the Penn State officials, which is why they are being fired, they have to be. What is KNOWN is very bad, and it is not unsubstantiated. In this story you’ll find a link to the actual indictment, after reading it I think you’ll understand why the reaction has been so far reaching.
http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/DA-Who-Never-Charged-Sandusky-Has-Been-Missing-Since-2005-133615093.html
Eliasim
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 12:39amI think what he really means is “Yes.“ Because otherwise just a flat ”No” would have been sufficient.
Report Post »Eliasim
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 12:46amMr. Eliasim do you believe we may be in the end times and that the fabric of society will unravel? Well I really like reading the Bible, and I really enjoy the “Word” because the word is the “Word”…I…I no I don’t believe society will unravel like a ball of yarn, not like a ball of yarn.
Report Post »knighttemplar999
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 12:58amA-well-a, bird, bird, bird, b-bird’s the word
Report Post »A-well-a, don’t you know about the bird
Well, everybody’s talking about the bird
A-well-a, bird, bird, b-bird’s the word
A-well-a, bird
Surfin’ bird
Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb, aaah
Pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa
Pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-ooma-mow-mow
Papa-ooma-mow-mow
NOT A CRAZY
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 1:55amDo you always talk to yourself, Eliasm?
Report Post »minorityconservative2
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 2:56amThis is creepy even for the trolls!
Report Post »symphonic
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 12:38amLIAR comes to mind.
Report Post »Kinger
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 12:34amWhen one begins to answer a question by repeating the question that was asked, what follows is usually a lie.
Report Post »symphonic
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 12:39amYeah, that was a simple NO, but he took a long long time to say that. LIAR comes to mind.
Report Post »minorityconservative2
Posted on November 15, 2011 at 3:01amMy exact thoughts! To people who are disgusted by the thought, the question would be so horrible that they would have almost shouted no. Repeating it would make a normal person sick to their stomach.
Report Post »