‘Don’t You Have Some Sense of Balance?’: Gingrich Slams Fox Panel for Asking About Ethics Docs
- Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:03pm by
Madeleine Morgenstern
- Print »
- Email »
Fox News Channel
Newt Gingrich had a contentious Fox News interview Saturday morning, at one point accusing the “Fox & Friends Weekend“ hosts of lacking ”balance” when they asked him about releasing documents related to his ethics investigation.
On Friday, the Romney campaign called on Gingrich to release records related to a House ethics investigation against him while he was Speaker. Most of the charges were dropped, though Gingrich was forced to pay $300,000 in fines. Asked by Fox‘s Clayton Morris about the Romney campaign’s push for the records, Gingrich scoffed.
“Don’t you sort of admire the arrogance and dishonesty of the Romney campaign? They can’t release their tax records, they’re hiding, he can’t even answer coherently on a debate, but they’re anxious to attack me for not disclosing?” Gingrich asked.
Saying the entire report is available online, and that anyone with questions afterward could “let me know,” Gingrich laid into Morris for asking the question.
“That’s 900 pages, Romney’s released zero, and you’re asking me to take seriously a challenge about openness from Romney?” Gingrich asked.
“We were just getting your take on what he’s saying,” Fox & Friends co-host Dave Briggs cut in.
“Even in the news media you ought to have some sense of balance,” Gingrich continued. “I’m just saying, as a reporter don’t you have some sense of balance? Isn’t fair and balanced part of the Fox mantra?”
“He was phrasing a question from the Romney camp,” Briggs said.
Attacking the media has become something of a signature for Gingrich, most recently on display during the GOP debate Thursday when he blasted CNN’s John King for asking about his ex-wife.
Watch the full interview below, via Fox News. Ethics investigation discussion begins at the 3:30 mark:
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 687 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 536 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 448 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 374 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 333 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 295 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 305 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 196 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 148 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 301 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 295 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (436)
LTinUT
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:42pmAll this cheering when Newt slams the media is like throwing fresh meat to a pack of wolves. Some are so caught up in mob mentality of “YES!! Slam the media’s bias and unfairness” that they are not paying attention to the REAL issues. Newt can certainly do well in a debate by showing his contempt and anger toward the media and the other candidates. Yes, he would wipe the floor with Obama. However, HOW IS IT THAT THIS IS THE CRITERIA FOR THE NOMINATION? Having an affair once is a mistake. Twice is a pattern. This man has a long history of having no personal honor or integrity. Oh, and do you really want to be calling a woman who has an affair with a married co-worker the FIRST LADY?? In my eyes, any woman knowingly and willingly conducting herself in that manner is no lady. The title would need to be changed to First Madam.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:54pmTHEY CAN’T WIN against Obama:
• Newt Gingrich is not on the ballot in Missouri and Virginia and did not qualify for all of the delegates in Tennessee.
• Rick Santorum is not on the ballot in Virginia, Ilinois and Washington, D.C., and did not qualify for all of the delegates in Ohio and Tennessee.
http://www.revolutionpac.com/2012/01/ron-paul-a-national-candidate-one-of-only-two-republicans-on-all-state-ballots/
Report Post »Thomas
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 2:00pmScrew the media. They are a bunch of propagandist who have done everything in their power to destroy this country. Fox news have become so scared of being called biased by the crooked “Lamestream Media” that now they are following suite. Its like being called a racist used to back people up when they had a valid point about the injustice of the civil rights movement. Why would a group need special rights when we should all be under the same law?
Report Post »TeaPartyForRomney
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 2:20pmFor all that the Tea Party stands for, please do not vote for Newt Gingrich. These are videos of him, in his own words praising the progressive FDR as the greatest president in the 20th century, not Reagan. He calls himself a ‘real politic Wilsonian’ after the progressive Woodrow Wilson, and praising the progressive movement as a greatest movement in our time. These are not just clips taken out of context, they are full quotes. We need to fight to keep progressives out of our government, for he is a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
Report Post »Remember that he also wanted a FEDERAL individual mandate as early as May 2011, on Meeting the Press. Then he changed his rhetoric after his campaign fell apart, which fell apart because of his praise of the IM and against conservative social engineering, most likely because of political necessity. Here he praises it in 2008. Remember also that he admitted that he had changed his book, removing the section on Global Warming, because of political pressure, this within the last few months. Even his scientist friend that wrote the chapter as his ghost writer, for his book, is speaking out against his change. If these are true changes, why would they have changed within the last few months. Remember also that he admitted that he had changed his book, removing the section on Global Warming, because of political pressure, this within the last few months. Even his scientist friend that wrote the chapter as his ghost writer, for his book came out about it
TeaPartyForRomney
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 2:22pmIt was shown yesterday that he likes to pander on stage against the media then love them behind the curtain. He is too two faced to be trusted.
Report Post »Hickory
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 2:29pmHey Vech, they are not on the primary ballot.
Report Post »Todd P
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 2:36pmI agree. He does great in the debate, but most of the people voting in the election will not want to choose a cheater (despite Clinton’s success) and his mistress. Santorum looks and sounds immature – he will not be popular on the national stage. Romney looks and sounds presidential, he is skilled at creating jobs, and has a successful marriage to boot. For people deperately looking for an alternative to Obama, it will be an easy choice. ROMNEY 2012
Report Post »5asquatch
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 2:40pmRomney “Im a progressive” you tube.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMcjJEXt9To
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 2:43pmah, they are only bias when NEWT says they are bias… i get it…
Report Post »WhereAreRomeysTaxReturns
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 2:51pm@teapartromney
The breaking news that Bishop Romney PROFITED from a company which was fined for medicare fraud and which he invested in should disqualify him from ever running from public office.
Is this why he is hiding his ill-gotten gains in the Cayman Islands and not showing ANY tax returns???
Bishop Romney is perpetrating a fraud upon the GOP voters. He is not to be trusted. He is a liar.
Diamond Girl
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 3:14pmYou hit the nail on the head…he’s great at debates, we all despise the biased msm…but this is going to far.
I am sick and tired of Newt getting away with NOT answering the questions this way! We’re in real big trouble on down the road if this man is made our nominee…there is much more baggage to come.
Plus…his attacks on capitalism is beneath contempt…dems do that…not so-called conservatives!
Report Post »Faith1029
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 3:22pmALL of the Media is helping to destroy this Nation. This isn’t even vetting anymore. It’s slander of the worst kind, looking for every tiny piece of dirt they can find, not to mention reporting on unproven allegations. The Republican candidates attacking each other is giving the Democrats all the ammo they need for the election. They won’t have to do a thing. Just cut and paste. People are online fighting and calling each other names to those who don’t form the same opinion, all the while professing to be Christians. The evil that has pervaded our land with ultimately destroy us if it is allowed to persist. Pray for the peace of the United States of America.
Report Post »fatjack
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 3:26pmWould someone please point out where the Romney headlines and stories are? I got a great headline; Romney refused to release his tax returns. Or how about; Romney refuses to talk to reporters, or Romney has the best organized and best finance campaign yet only wins one election in a neighboring state.
Why are there so few articles on Romney? Come on Blaze give us some of those sensationalize headlines for Romney.
I wonder who Beck will support if Santorum drops out?
BTW I plan on voting for Santorum on super Tuesday.
Report Post »Bible Quotin' Science Fearin' Conservative American
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 3:26pmNewt crying and whining when the media asks him something he doesn’t want to answer is CHEERED.
What a sniveling worm.
Report Post »CATPBJ
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 3:40pmAll media is far from ‘fair and balanced’. However, when Newt slams the media for simply asking a question, he is being an elitist idiot. Newt is a serial adulterer with such an enormous ego that he truly believes the reason he sought extramarital affairs was due to his severe love of America. This is a crock of BS! Newt’s grandiosity is a psychological disorder and he needs to be as far from the keys for our nuclear warheads as possible. I don’t know about you, but I would like to see this planet survive for a few more generations….. and if Newt is at the helm I think that his psychological disorders might interfere with rational thought and lead us into an apocalyptic doomsday!
Report Post »CATPBJ
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 3:48pmWhy is the LSM not picking on Willard the way they are picking on Newt? There is nothing fair and balanced about that!
TEA
Report Post »COFFEE
MOCHA
ROOBOIS TEA
MACCHIATO
GREEN TEA
BOSTON TEA PARTY
SOY LATTE
TEA
JohnVGaltFLA
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 3:56pmLTinUT, based on your criteria, a man who had an affair with a married woman, then after marrying and divorcing her, womanizing along the way, and then impregnating another unmarried woman would not be qualified to be President.
So if you did vote for Reagan, you just voted for the man I described above. Newt is by no means perfect as a man but he did seek guidance and forgiveness for his sins from the church. I’ll cut him slack on that aspect of his moral character for the guts and faith it takes to do that, an act he engaged in long before deciding to run for President.
Would I vote for him? Hell no, but that‘s because he’s a progressive big government slob.
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 4:11pm@ TeapartygprRpmney:
Romney has lambasted Reagan several times on video saying the he is not a Reagan Republican and would not go back to the Reagan/Bush era ways.
Romney said it. That does not play well in SC or the next line of states he is going to. Furthermore he has not explained a coming to Jesus moment over it either.
Report Post »Bible Quotin' Science Fearin' Conservative American
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 5:02pmIf this sniveling little worm is your best shot then you guys are in some deep doo doo.
Report Post »Bum thrower
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 5:05pmLet’s see: if you like(d) Gerald Ford, Bob Dole, and “Corpse” McCain….YOU”LL love Mittnes!!
Report Post »Bluebonnet
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 5:13pmROB. That’s a crude way to put it. I’m more inclined to say most of our politicians have dabbled in moral issues, and that doesn’t make it right, but why beat up on a few and let the others get away with it? Sin is Sin and not just in the category we choose to use.
Report Post »For anyone really interested in who’s done what to whom: there are several sites you can google and get more info. Not that many clean ones if you pay attention. Look up: Washington Insider Man’s Club, or, Man’s Country Club, or “the fellowship of the minds” Hillbuzz. It’s all there, just a few moments to confirm that we have a sleazy bunch of politicians. The mainstream press all know about this but keep it quiet. They’ll probably cancel this post as it is
Treaty
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 5:15pmWe have crap candidates this go round. Ron Paul is the only half decent guy running. As for FOX, I used to love them. But since Glen left it just seems like they are trying to move more to the left. Hate to see such a good News source self destruct.
Report Post »ambrosia
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 5:45pmMedia….Schmedia…..!
Hey, Buster Troll,
if you want to throw a “Pity Party” for the media-
count on having a lot of cupcakes & Kool-Aid, leftover !
What are you……a free-range dope ?
Get your freakin’, busybody nose, outa‘ everyone else’s crotch-
sniffin’ & snootin’,
scratchin’ & rootin,
like some some bloody, ole’ anteater.
Apparently, the only ones that give a damn, about anyone else’s
Report Post »“love life”
are ABC, CNN and YOU-
It’s obvious, you don’t have one of your own………Get Crackin’, Romeo !
ksw3rd
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 5:46pmWell said.
Report Post »gmoneytx
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 5:56pmFunny thing about media, without a crisis, they have no ratings, without ratings no advertisers, without advertisers no money, without money…no media, problem solved.
That‘s why the media won’t let that happen, they will pick the candidate for the sheeple, as long as the sheeple watch and “believe” the media, are you a sheeple or an intelligent INDIVIDUAL?
Report Post »2patriotic
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 5:58pmJust like bill clinton????
Report Post »2patriotic
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 6:02pmvechorik
He will qualify for the general,in all states when Newt gets nominated.
Report Post »bastone
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 6:52pmhis marrage problems are minor. what bothers me is the fact that he attacked clinton and asked for his inpeachment for immoral acts while he was doing the samething at the same time. thats pure evil and proves he cant be trusted with this country..
Report Post »pghpatriot
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 7:28pmLTINUT,
you mention ‘the real issues.’ what are the real issues in your mind? Fidelity? Perfection? If those are really the REAL ISSUES, then there isn’t a politician in this country who stands a chance. Maybe you should run? And before you mention Santorium, he is a bit too sanctimonious for me. His strongest suit is accusations and playing the ‘religion’ card. In my estimation that is a very small part of the presidency.
I am a practicing Christian, and a pretty good one too, so Newt’s transgressions do disturb and offend me, however, those are 10 year old problems, not that time makes them any more palatable, but (some) people can and do change over time. We all evolve. Some for the good, some for the bad. Newt has accepted Christ and said he has made peace with his family and God. Maybe he has and maybe he hasn’t. But that is between him and his Maker. The only One who can rightly judge him.
Bottom line for me, though he comes with much baggage, I am convinced he is the only one who can stand up to obama and defeat him with the same weapon obama used to bamboozle the country three years ago and continues todaay, ORATORY. Conservative oratory. Newt has stated, in great detail, many of his planned actions. To this day obama can‘t and hasn’t done that.
And to your last point, your characterization of his wife is despicable. I hope your judge on judgement day is fairer. Even still, I’d rather have her in OUR White House than someone who has no pride in
Report Post »ElPzee
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:13pm@teapartyromney.
Your name is an oxymoron. The TEA party was created to get Establishment Big Government Progressives out of the republican party. THAT MEANS ROMNEY!!!
Report Post »MiloArk
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:53pmhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cv2q5wiV3kU&feature=autoplay&list=PL7D4F2C07A83C9714&lf=plpp_play_all&playnext=2
Yeah, vote for the filthy Mormon.
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:22pmIt shouldn’t take very long for people to realize that Gingrich is just dodging questions by attacking the questioner. He is good at making it look like the very act of questioning him on his shady past is offensive in some way, but when he does it again and again… it gets old, fast.
“The TEA party was created to get Establishment Big Government Progressives out of the republican party. THAT MEANS ROMNEY!!!”
Actually, that means Gingrich. Gingrich is the very epitome of establishment Republican progressives, yet somehow he has managed to cast himself as the “true conservative.” Just shows how good he is at deceiving people. We already have a great deceiver in the White House, why not get someone with some INTEGRITY?
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:29pm“Is this why he is hiding his ill-gotten gains in the Cayman Islands and not showing ANY tax returns???”
Actually, the money in the Cayman Islands was put there by a blind trustee. All of it was taxed at the proper rate. Romney doesn’t handle his own money, he has to hire people to do it for him. That is what happens when you are incredibly successful, it becomes a full time job just to manage your finances.
Report Post »idarusskie
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:31pmno third Lady
Report Post »idarusskie
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:40pmwarren Jeffs is not a Mormon. He is a fundamentalist Mormon. completely different churches.
Report Post »jzs
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 11:06pmIt’s irks me that FOX is becoming a mouthpiece for the communists. At one time FOX was fair and balanced, but now they are carrying water for the Democrats, not to mention drinking the koolaid, robotically repeating progressive talking points that come from Obama or his cronies.
Report Post »SDMF
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 11:42pmHe cries foul anytime he receives a question he doesn’t want to answer. It’s seriously getting old.
Report Post »lonesirvyvor
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:41amyou want to talk integrity and Honor? Obama campaigned on a platform of “civil discoures” which means polite discussion. . .immediately after the election, begins clamoring about “Class WARFARE” Obama and the DNC, and the congressional Black Caucus have been iinciting to RIOT, ROB, RAPE, AND MURDER the AMERICAN PEOPLE. 3 years of beating the “Class WARFARE” drums. . .if you do not know what WAR means. . .it is MURDER,DEATH, and DESTRUCTION. for 3 years, OBAMA, the DNC and CBC have been arming Mexican Drug Cartel foot soldiers with the finest MILITARY WEAPONS that AMERICAN TAXPAYER MONEY CAN BUY.
Report Post »Bullsihtter
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:00amSo what you are saying your closet is 100% clean?
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:28am“So what you are saying your closet is 100% clean?”
Newt is running for president. His character is something that should be analyzed by the voters. Unfortunately, they aren’t doing a very good job of it so far.
Report Post »C-Delta Conductor
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:43amAll media is inherently biased, in the stories they report, in who they hire, in how they cover news. The genius of the Gingrich campaign is that he has poised himself as a person of action by criticizing a trait that is inseparable from the new-media. I despise Gingrich’s policy positions but I give him the credit of being a shrewd politician; however, I curse THE VOTERS for not being able to cut through the rhetoric.
Report Post »Luke611
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:22amWhen the people stand and honor their privilage to vote by surrendering that gift to an individual with severe character dismissiveness to be their leader, with expectation that he will honor their trust, and they do so with applause is rudimentary of the greater ill this nation suffers.
Romney lost because he is LDS. Some of you are skirting your responsibility by placing a priority of tax disclosure before the mandatory due date, over moral character of the candidate. Romney grossed over 300k last year on interest alone; do you think his taxes are calculated? When has he been home to do so? Regardless of who is managing his interest, it will require a great deal of participation on his part to complete his taxes.
Has for Gingrich, he’s going to continue to attack the media everytime his ethics are questioned but the people will begin to listen…and realize they aren’t hearring an answer.
The hypocrisy of each SoCarolina Evangelical that substantiated Gingrich’s ethics because of religious ignorance and bigotry toward another man that demonstrates moral integrity, truly exhibits has to why attendence in these man-made churches are declining. Your preachers dont dont teach morals or ethics, you pay them and they teach you the religion of man. The innocent will suffer so the guilty can be punished.
Romney will win the states that matter. Tx Ca Az Or Wa Id Ut Nv NM Co Wy Mt Mich,Mnn Ill,In,Mo,Oh,Pen NY Vt Tn Va Mass and enough delegates in the South to win.
Report Post »Love_John_Galt
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:41amSarah Palin / Tea Party / 9-12ers have complexly abandoned their principles by supporting an unethical/crook like Newt! They will hand Obama another 4 years on a silver platter! What a joke!
Liberals, Independents, and Libertarians will never vote for Mitt or Newt.
Come on Florida Republicans – prove you understand the importance of this election. Stand with the Constitution! Don’t just talk-the-talk!
Report Post »myway2112
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 8:54amI agree 100%. People are getting to caught up in this whole deal. Conservatives will be making a big mistake if this man gets into office. I seriously call his personal conduct in question.
Report Post »eyestoseeearstohear
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:16amWow…it MUST be a long WAY UP to get on YOUR HIGH HORSE.
Hey, LITTLE NUT or Lieutenant NUT or Little i-Nut –
YOU obviously are a OBAMA-NUT, and want your Big CoCoNUT!
Well, since your HIGH & MIGHTY METER IS STUCK ON HONOR & INTEGRITY -
MAYBE YOU FIRST NEED TO APPLY & DEMAND THESE STANDARDS BE PUT
IN PLACE WITH THE HEAD NUT – AND WORK YOUR WAY DOWN FROM THERE.
Obama HAS NO honor OR integrity.
He’s lied and hidden EVERYTHING about him, from DAY ONE.
And, THAT which he has said, told, released & stated, IS NOT TRUE!
So, there‘s your First assignment to work on Obama’s HONOR.
Your Second assignment is understand this election is NOT about the Fist Lady.
BUT- YOU can begin with the current 1st Lady and deal with her lack of INTEGRITY.
ALL that you are concerned about seems to apply to the CURRENT OCCUPANTS.
THEY HAVE HONOR & INTEGRITY ISSUES.
You can’t beat a cheater, a liar, a briber, a crook or etc. by playing FAIR.
Obama, who certainly is NOT KNOWN for being FAIR nor using honor or integrity-
therefore, Republicans shouldn’t fall for unfair and un-reasonable rules.
All is fair in love and war – and THIS will be WAR – ON BOTH SIDES.
Report Post »HippoNips
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:39amNewt was not forced to pay 300 k in fines.
He voluteered to pay the expenses of handling the one million dollar pages of his records
Newt was cleared off all but a minor offense that required no reprimand
The phony accustions were launched by Piglosi and the democrats, not the GOP
Report Post »Hoever, some liberal Republicans joined in on a the fun including a mormon from Utah
Realist4U
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:19pmand, how do you feel about Obama’s relationship with Larry Sinclair?
Report Post »DooDuh
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 2:26pmJOHNVGALTFLA… you wrote:
“LTinUT, based on your criteria, a man who had an affair with a married woman, then after marrying and divorcing her, womanizing along the way, and then impregnating another unmarried woman would not be qualified to be President. So if you did vote for Reagan, you just voted for the man I described above.”
Huh? I’ve never heard this before. What’s your source for those accusations? In the Marriages and Children section on Reagan’s Wikipedia page… nothing like what you suggest is even remotely hinted. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Reagan
I‘m confused because I’ve never heard those accusations against Reagan before. Can you give me your source for that?
Report Post »Roberto G. Vasquez
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 2:32pmThe media never asks Obama to provide his recorrds which are alleged by many to prove that he isn’t legally qualified to be president. Why not if the media isn’t biased against Republicans???
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 2:35pmDirty photo of Gingrich and daughters
http://a8.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/394241_351207988242191_100000589794465_1278022_378491793_n.jpg
Report Post »Grey Eagle
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:25pmFOX News is NO longer fair and balanced. Instead they are biased against everyone but Romney.
Report Post »GoliathOnline
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 1:14amtheres literally HUNDREDS and HUNDREDS of pages on MY ETHIC VIOLATIONS. WOW!!! is this really the man we are backing??? his morals. his progressivism.. his lobbying.. what hell conservatives?? what the hell are you guys doing?????!! stop falling for a damn ******* just because he can smooth talk himself into your pants! look at his record! HE IS NO DAMN CONSERVATIVE!!!! he kisses up to Clinton and FDR and no way has he ever praised Reagan.. but he sure likes to take all of Reagans credit for himself!
Report Post »doomytram
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 7:26amThere have been 17 debates and now they just added an 18th. I haven’t watched a minute of 1 of them and they are like a soap opera. Apparently 5 million people are watching this garbage, but 18 million are watching American Idol and 20 million watching football. Bottom line is voted for Ron Paul in 2008 and i’m voting for Ron Paul in 2012.
I don’t need a debate to know that the EPA, Dept of Ed, Dept of Commerce, Dept agriculture, et al all do the opposite of what they are supposed to do. Oh, and all of the above are asking for more money. YOU don”t need a debate to know we are bankrupted by Leftist and Leftism.
Report Post »welovetheUSA
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:42pmWhat a sham that the media Never went after Clinton….like they are doing Newt, this was 14 years ago, he was not president, no one knows if its true, he said, she said…its in the past and we are a forgiving nation..look at Clinton, making million off public speaches…the democrats and womens liberal groups stuck up for clinton……..All I waiting for is the media to go after Obama the way they do the republicans…..First question…”Your dear driend and advisors Bill Ayers, the terrorist of the weathman underground…..Valerie Jarrett, the jew hater who was involved with the war in Egypt against the jews and christians.
Report Post »psadie
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:56pm@WELOVETHEUSA
Report Post »Here is a tidbit for you. Valerie Jarrett has ties to Iran…she was born there of American parents.
13th Imam
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:57pmThat sort of behavior is fine for No Sensei, JZ, Tif, Rust Noggin. It is perfectly acceptable for any DEMOCRAT, as no standards apply. That is why Saul is so effective for controlling the Taker Horde
Report Post »ronaldreaganthegreat
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 2:18pmObamamao is a communist and so is his whole admin and the dem party of today. Dont worry, the American people realize there is a rat in the white house and he will be booted in out in November;-)
Report Post »oneshiner
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 3:14pmAll these people who adopt a, Holier Than Thou, attitude don’t even bother to learn about some of the other Washington D.C.ers. Yeah, Clinton was the most familiar, but they all have a shady history.
Report Post »I suggest to anyone who wants a big shock to look up, “Washington Insider Man’s Club” and see if you recognize any of these folks. So, I think you either need to get over the moral issue or include many others in your disgust of our politicians.
tifosa
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 3:29pmAwwww, 13th, I’m flattered. Have clearly Occupied space between your ears. btw, which of those Alinsky Tactics have NOT been used by foxbeckrush, by you and other commenters in here?
Report Post »Grace1798
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:41pmPresident Reagan was divorced and re-married and one of the best Presidents USA has had in a very long time. Jimmy Carter was the worst President of all time and married to ONE WOMAN. Obama is the worst President in American History and he has ONE WIFE. Bill Clinton the BJ boy HAD ONE WIFE but cheated on here like crazy and there are people who STILL ADORE the man. Guess that was okay huh? But somehow, it’s not Okay for Newt who, by the way, repented, went back to a relationship with God and apologized to everyone he hurt. Did Bill Clinton do that? NO. There are many more examples but this should make the point.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 2:20pmGrace, making a mistake when your young and getting a divorce, remarrying when you meet another person later, is different than having affairs twice and then divorcing twice and having three wives. He also was removed as Speaker for ethics violations. He also promised as speaker he would not allow anti-second amendment legislation to pass through the house but did and even voted for them. Should I continue?
Report Post »Faith1029
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 2:52pmGRACE1798: “Okay for Newt who, by the way, repented, went back to a relationship with God and apologized to everyone he hurt. Did Bill Clinton do that? NO. There are many more examples but this should make the point.”
…….and the Kennedys………….
Report Post »LongRange
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 3:08pmPlease don’t continue, at least until you fact check. I am not a Newt follower but you are taking great liberties with the truth. He was never removed from being speaker. In fact upon investigation he was proven correct and the House was wrong. Weather you like the guy or not don’t act like a Democrat with the facts…
Report Post »bastone
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 6:47pmhe said he repented after divorcing the first wife. how many repents do ya get?
Report Post »WhereAreRomeysTaxReturns
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:38pmThis breaking story below makes me sick and reinforces my view that Bishop Romney is greedy, out of touch and will fire his mother to make a dime If you’re in SC and about to vote, read this before your to so:
http://www.redstate.com/williamjameson/2012/01/20/mitt-romney-involved-in-medicare-fraud/
While Romney was a director of Damon Corp., a medical testing company acquired by Bain Capital in 1989, the company was defrauding Medicare of millions. Romney profited handsomely from his investment in the suburban Boston company (which Bain, the private-equity firm Romney co-founded, sold several years later). The company was fined $100 million. But Romney himself made a fortune.
Report Post »Grannie4news
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 3:17pm@WHEREAREROMEYSTAXRETURNS: I see you as a troll who has just now began to blog here and try to insinuate you are LDS by calling Romney (yea you left out the N) Bishop Romney. You are merely supporting Gingrich or Paul or another fundamentalist who does not believe we are Christians.
Report Post »I seriously doubt that anything you have tried to tie to him will not stand. If he himself has done anything unlawful, it will come out in the open not by some little troll shooting off their mouth.
slr4528
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 3:34pmYou do know Romney ran a tight race with Kennedy the King of dirt digging in 1994 and he also ran against the most vile liberal Democrats in the country for governor of MA in 2002-If there was REAL garbage on Romney,it would have come up by now….if there was any meat to your story from 89…they would have exposed it.
By the way,you do know that Eric Erickson of RedState has an aggressive anyone but Romney agenda? It is well known amongst political junkies and I have caught RedState numerous times slanting their stories. That is why when I send people a link from Redstate, I tell people that the site has a clear agenda and it is not to seek the truth.
That is why I do not watch CNN election returns when Erickson is on as an analyst…I always thought analysts were suppose to be objective.
Report Post »myway2112
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 5:21amYep, you’re a troll. Sorry but it is true. You insinuate Mr. Romney has done something wrong but not releasing his taxes. He made a conscious decision not to do so, so what? And I am not sure of your intent of addressing him as Bishop Romney, which would seem to be a swipe at the Church. I stand and attest the Mitt Romney has more character in his little finger than Newt Gingrich has ever known in his whole life. No low life troll can tear this man down. Mitt Romney is a decent, hardworking family man with character and back bone to boot. I’ll lay dollars to pesos you could not say that about yourself. At the end of the day Mitt Romney displays what I like to call the “3 C’s”, Courage, Character and commitment. Can you look in the mirror and honestly say that about yourself?
Report Post »Joe Schmuck
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:33pmHas Newt immunized himself form the media??
They got rid of the Palin’s, Bachman’s, Cain’s and the likes. And still working on the current nominees.
The media won’t be so nice with B.O cracking the whip!
Report Post »Joe Schmuck
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:52pmIf Newt fixed America back in the 90’s, why are we in this mess?
Over the years, both parties have campaigned for many of the same things. Both parties have been in control and we still:
Do not have Term Limits
Do not have a balanced budget amendment
The Debt ceiling continues to get raised
Illegals continue to cross our border
The entitlement programs have not been fixed
We have ignored our own energy resources
Government is bigger than ever.
I could go on and on but there is a word limit. However, I think I made my point. The American people have been scammed. I was hoping the Tea-Party could get something going, but that’s starting to look pretty glib.
God gave us the most beautiful nation on earth and the only chance I see of getting it back is with His help.
Report Post »Bill Rowland
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:53amWe are not only being scammed we are being treated like Idiots. Obumbler thinks we are to stupid to figure out that the bills passed by the house are tabled by Hapless Harry Reed. We are not capable of figuring out that the road block is the Democrats in the Senate.
We have to take back the Senate and the White House, if we don’t we are screwed and there will be no kiss or forepay.
We also need to be ready for the riots in several cities (Detroit, Philly, Washington DC, Chicago ,etc.) when Obumbler loses. Its going to get intense.
OMG
Report Post »larrylarrylarry
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:31pmBalancing? Is that what you call having a woman on the side when you are married. Newt, what an old wannabe gigolo.
Report Post »MSGT
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:35pmPlease grow up. The country is at stake
Report Post »lylejk
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:40pmYes it is MSGT and Newt’s not the one. I really don’t like any of the candidates that much, but right now it’s Santorum. I will never support the guy who has caused our current fiscal morass (NAFTA/GATT) and will do what it takes to tell folk to see through Newt before it’s too late. :)
Report Post »Andy
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:48pmLarry, Larry, Larry. Where is your other brother Larry? :)
Report Post »MSGT
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 2:08pm@LELEJK Santorum CAN’T WIN.
Report Post »Grace1798
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:30pmFox News has been Jamming Romney down our throats! I’ve noticed it for some time now. I’m not even watching them anymore because of it. How dare they decide the outcome by pushing a specific candidate on the public. The American people will decide. I like Newt Gingrich, but if he doesn’t become the Nominee and Romney does, than I’ll vote for Romney. Of course we want to remove Obama from office and get this country back. If you do vote in the General Election, please vote for Conservatives for Senate and the House IF you want this country turned back from Socialism and regain our freedoms.
Report Post »MSGT
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:33pmBeck has been doing the same damn thing
Report Post »Shasta
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:55pm@MSGT, do you actually listen to Beck, or do you get your information from others. Beck is very pro Santorum. He has said however, that if the general election came down to Romney vs. Obummer, he would hold his nose and vote for Romney. Just because Beck is anti-Ginrich, does not make him pro-Romney.
Report Post »MSGT
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 2:12pm@SHASTA
Yes I listen to Beck. I was even dumb enough to subscribe to GBTV. Glen is most definitely pushing Mittens. His VERY SOFT support for Santorum is a joke.
Google, ‘The WHITE HORSE PROPHECY’
Report Post »bTeri
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 3:21pmThis comment is 100% FALSE. As a Romney supporter I assure you that Romney is endlessly being slammed and criticized in the media in general and on Fox in particular. Fox either has a horse in the race that is not Romney or just wants to stretch out the race to make more $. Meanwhile Gingrich who was too busy hawking books and films to create a real campaign/organization is getting free airtime on Fox several times a day to advertise and market himself for free. For the past few weeks there has literally been a daily segment on Hannity, with Santorum running a close second – and more often than not several shows w/ Newt segments throughout the day. Your perception is clearly skewed.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 2:25pmMSGT: Beck said Friday on the radio that he would back a 3rd party or vote for Obama if Newt gets the nomination. I about ran off the road. Then he said “at least we know Obama is good on Israel” Honest to goodness, that’s what he said! I put in a CD at that point, I couldn’t take anymore.
Report Post »UrsaMajor
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 5:20amGlenn did NOT say that Obama was good on Israel.
He said Israel was the only GOOD thing he could support about Gingrich.
Report Post »UrsaMajor
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 5:21amEven a blind monkey with head trauma can see that Glenn supports Santorum. Anyone who says otherwise just isn’t listening or they are a liar.
Report Post »lylejk
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:30pmAnything about your public record should be fair game Newt; maybe not about comments from one of your ex-wives, but public record is. You are simply wrong not to address your record. To people who currently support you, I will give them the benifit of the doubt and believe they are just plain ignorant of your record. The fact is you were the enabler responsible for the passage of both NAFTA and GATT which has all but destroyed the fiscal foundation of our nation. You are also a Globalist and Global Warming advocate who has more in common with Nancy Pelosi then me. You are also anti-capitalist imo based on your recent actions. Does Fanny/Freddie ring a bell with you too? Trust me, you can fool some folk about your changed ways, but never me. You sir, are what’s wrong with our nation. Get out before you make a bigger fool of yourself then you already have. Blather may be good short term but it can never be sustained and folks will soon see through this and regret ever supporting a man such as yourself. Note, I have not even begone to attack his personal indiscretions/trists yet, but folk already know about that; will jab that way from time to time as well if that works to get you to leave with your tail tucked behind your rear end. :)
Report Post »Elucidator
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 2:50pmIf you knew what you were talking about you‘d realize that Newt was a patriot in the 90’s. Do you even realize what the trumped up ethics investigation was all about? Here’s a link to the ethics report. All you need to read starts on page 4 – Summary of Findings. Read about 10 pages and you‘ll change your opinion on Gingrich’s actions in the 90′s. Oh, and keep in mind, everything the Democrats alleged in the charges was related to interpretations of the tax code related to 501(c)3′s which, after he resigned, were completely cleared by the IRS. Bottom line, Newt fell on his sword for the sake of the Country and his party. He deserves a medal, not some uninformed boob blathering about something he knows nothing about:
http://ethics.house.gov/sites/ethics.house.gov/files/House%20Report%20105-1_1.pdf
Report Post »bTeri
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 3:28pmElucidator: Hmmm.. Didnt 3 of 4 of the Republicans on the committee that investigated Gingrich find him at fault? And didnt he do such a great job as Speaker that he was thrown out by Democrats AND the signifcant majority of Republicans after two years. Quite a leader. Convenient truths to leave out. We do not need to replace an arrogant ineffective progressive leader with an arrogant ineffective conservative one.
Report Post »lylejk
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 7:49pmOh I quite remember the Contract with America Elucidator. Also remember that Gingrich helped in the supposed balancing the budget (lots of accounting tricks if you ask me). These were good things, but I also remember what Ross Perot said if NAFTA/GATT were to pass and I see our nation now and know who gave us this morass. Our nation deeply suffered because of Gingrich’s push for these idiotic trade agreements and for that, I will never forgive him period. Really surprised nobody’s covering that part, but I guess it’s because nearly all the Republican party are neocons and participated in this fool-hardy action, but I‘ll keep this flame lit since I don’t want the destroyer of our way of life to ever get a chance to make it worse period. ‘Nough said. :)
Report Post »mathewsjw
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:27pmNO Fines, 84 counts ALL eventually dismissed except 1 for misleading ethics committee which was bogus part of GOP elites pushing out Gingrich for the Hasert Spending GOP leadership, sanctioned $300k to reimburse committee lawyers, NO Fines, stop the lies
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:29pmThey weren’t DISMISSED — They were DROPPED when Gingrich resigned.
This one was going big-time and I would have loved to have heard the end result (Gingrich’s resignation put an end to it):
Newt Gingrich was under FBI investigation for bribery
Little known to the American public Newt Gingrich and his then wife Marianne were the subject of a US Justice Department criminal investigation in the late 1990s involving a $10 million bribe of the world’s largest private arms dealer, Sarkis Soghanalia.
Unaware that Soghanalian was an FBI informant, it is alleged that Marianne Gingrich whilst working for the Israel Export Development Corporation (IEDC) tried to facilitate a bribe to the tune of $10 million so that her husband could use his influence to lift the arms embargo against Iraq in order for Soghanalian to collect an outstanding payment of $54 million from Saddam Hussein.
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 2:00pmAlleged by?
Report Post »The DNC?
The LSM?
slr4528
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 2:23pmIf Newt by some miracle wins the GOP nomination….all of the information that Romney is requesting from the investigation will leak out by Nancy……and it will show everyone for once what a lying pig Gingrich is…but by that time it will be too late.
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 3:41pmThe charges went away when Gingrinch resigned…..another words he cut a deal. Romney is requesting that the “actual” charges as well as the deal get exposed!
You do not pay $374,000 and resign your position if there was nothing to the charges!
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 4:50pm@vechoric – kudos to you for trying to remind these people but they are just like obama worshippers and just slip it under the rug. they try to say it is only about marriages – not so. Well maybe the newtie can go back to check kiting!
Report Post »NickDeringer
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:25pmMr. Speaker, do you believe that America is ready to put yet another adulterer in the White House?
Report Post »MSGT
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:32pmWOW, How stupid do you have to be to think the rest of the field is pure as the driven snow?
Report Post »ranger22x
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:40pmYes!! Go Newt 2012
Report Post »kalayaan
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 3:05amI’d rather have an adulterer that can do the job in the White House than a Socialist who cannot do the job in the White House….
Gingrich for President!!!
Report Post »bluegirlb
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:24pmDo any of you out there think that the left wing media will take what Newt did to John King lying down? Remember Nancy Pelosi! The media will get even. They will not do it now but they will wait until Newt is our candidate. They will dig up every piece of his past, including his flirtation with Socialism. they will hit ever aspect of his political and private life. You may say now, “but its all out there and Newt will be able to take care of them.” The problem is, Newt has so much past that both the media and Obama will exploit. How many times can Newt stand there and blast the media without ever answering the questions truthfully? Don’t you think there are things out there that we are unaware of? They will find them. They would do that no matter who our candidate is. But the will relish getting even with Newt and he has so much baggage to drag up. This is far from over with the media and Newt.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 4:53pmYou got that right. He is taking from palin the in your face nasty media and then sit back and crybaby about the media is so mean and I am being treated so unfairly. Can read them just like a book. If he thinks he will get by with that – he is even a bigger dumb ass then I thought.
Report Post »ekcol
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:32pmHate breeds hate, karma, what goes around comes around…the MSM will dig it up.
Report Post »honor007
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:23pmBOOM! He is awesome on the comeback. Never flinches. Gotta love THAT!
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:32pmSociopaths are usually defined as people displaying anti social behavior which is mainly characterized by lack of empathy towards others that is coupled with display of abnormal moral conduct and inability to conform with the norms of the society. People suffering from antisocial personality disorder are often referred to as sociopaths. Some of the other characteristics that sociopaths may display are stealing, lying, lack of remorse for others and towards living beings, irresponsible behavior, impulsive behavior, drug or alcohol abuse, problems with the law, violating rights of others, aggressive behavior and much more.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 3:18pmWho are the real sociopaths here…
Ron Paul supporters threaten Atlanta family with rape, death http://shar.es/fnqkA
Not to mention…. losing some more military support…
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 3:45pmTIME TO END THE PAUL CAMPAIGN
Read the Esquire article from Fall of 2010…Gingrich Staffers as well as his 2nd wife refer to Gingrich as a Sociopath. How else could he have lead a double life for 8 years with 2 women plus additional mistresses and how else can you account for his ability to lie so well?
Report Post »WhereAreRomeysTaxReturns
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:21pmFox News has made its bias towards supporting Bishop “$10,000 bet” Romney quite clear. This interview just reinforces it. Fox want Christie as the Bishop’s Veep and Roger Ailes lobbied Christie to sign up for the campaign.
This wont work though: Romeny is about to crash in SC, despite Fox loving the Bishop. Checkmate!
The Bishop is just deflecting the fact that he hides his money in anti-American offshore bank accounts, has invested in medicare-fraud companies, and refuses to release his tax returns.
This ethics stuff is OLD news and is public knowledge from over 15 years ago. Bishop Romney’s tax returns are not.
What are you hiding, Bishop?
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:28pmSo “Old news?” Who put limitations on honesty?
Like Newt’s past sexual behavior is “old news.”
Okay, so make a rule that a candidates life can’t be taken into consideration. Maybe just the last five years?
RIDICULOUS!
Report Post »Buck Shane
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:30pmNewt doesn’t think very highly of Mitt
Report Post »Mitt doesn’t think very highly of Newt.
I agree with both of them.
SUMTHINSTINKS
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:20pmThat ethics report Mitt Romney has been calling on Newt Gingrich to release? Click here to read it. All 1,200 pages. It’s been available for 15 years.
http://ethics.house.gov/committee-report/matter-representative-newt-gingrich
Report Post »WhereAreRomeysTaxReturns
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:25pmYeh. Checkmate, Bishop Romney!
Report Post »bTeri
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 3:34pmTher are MILLIONS of pages in the investigation. The 1000 pages is a sanitized summary. Romney’s campagin is talking about releasing all of the information uncovered during the investigation of Gingrich. The same information that investigation committee member Nancy Pelosi is salivating to share if conservatives are hopefuless enough to nominate Gingrich. He is a man that has so many skeltons that a closet just wont do.
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 3:49pmSUMTHINSTINKS
There is so much more to this report. Gingrich cut a deal. There was a very good reason why Gingrich had to pay the highest fine ever for a Congressman of $374,000 and why he was forced to resign by his own party. Nancy Pelosi has this information because she was on the committee that investigated Gingrich.
Report Post »myway2112
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 5:35amEvryone knows this. Mitt is talking about the release of the paperwork leading up to and causing the investigation. The ground work that led up to the investigation. that is where the meat a potatoes are.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:18pmRon Paul and Newt Gingrich have different ideas of what to do with federal bureaucracies. Ron Paul fights to rein them in and shut them down before they can do harm. Gingrich pads his personal bank account while they wreck our economy.
While Ron Paul was fighting environmental extremists, the out-of-control EPA, and the Soros-funded green movement, Newt Gingrich was filming commercials with Nancy Pelosi.
While Ron Paul was fighting government bailouts, Newt was saying he would have voted FOR them.
Don’t be fooled by the words candidates use when they are running for office. Look hard at their records. Ron Paul’s record is one of true limited government, anti-Washington, D.C. conservatism.
Newt Gingrich has a long record of liberal appeasement, flip-flopping on key issues, and lobbying for insider millions.
Report Post »ZeldaZick
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:57pmO.K. so explain to me why Dr. Paul only got 14% of the vote in S.C., which is one of the most conservative christian states in the Bible belt?
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:39pmI blame the Tea Party — hijacked by the GOP war machine, Beck, Fox, Palin, etc.
It was Tea Party vote (which is supposed to be for financial stability and SMALL conservative government) that gave him the win. Tea Party isn’t so active in NH and you saw where Newt fell there.
Newt is far from conservative. He’s another McCain, coming up and Obama will eat him alive by bringing up Newt’s past: personal and congressional. Since the media favors Romney, you can bet they will begin tearing Newt down big-time.
The media has just about blacked-out neutral coverage of Ron Paul. Just wait until they turn on Newt (and they will).
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:17pmI‘d like to see Obama’s medical records… Whatya bet he’s HIV POSITIVE…. i got twenty bucks !
Report Post »WhereAreRomeysTaxReturns
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:26pm20 bucks bet? The Bishop would say you’re Cheap and poor.
How about a $10,000 bet, Romney style?
Report Post »Fighting4America
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:16pmI am so depressed. We are gonna screw up again!! How frustrating. Newt is a bad choice for America. We just don’t get it.
Rick would be great, but his personality prevents him from successfully selling it to the voters.
At least Mitt has good character. Moral values. NO he is not as conservative as I would like him to be, but I trust him. I think he is more of an outsider, he has managed more than a hotdog stand, and he loves America.
Report Post »I can only hope we realize the baggage Newt has and how it will come out. NEWT=4 MORE YEARS OF SOCIALISM
Ric
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:27pmI agree….Mitt may not be the “ideal conservative” but he at least has true business experience and has not been feeding at the public trough his entire life.
Report Post »I’m still undecided, but any of these would be better than the problem we have endured for the past 3 years!!
WhereAreRomeysTaxReturns
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:32pmBishop Romney = many years firing people and profiting from fraud.
Do you REALLY want to vote for a man whose company invests in companies convicted of medicare fraud??
–>>> See this:
While Romney was a director of Damon Corp., a medical testing company acquired by Bain Capital in 1989, the company was defrauding Medicare of millions. Romney profited handsomely from his investment in the suburban Boston company (which Bain, the private-equity firm Romney co-founded, sold several years later).
Prosecutors called it corporate greed run amok. The company was fined $100 million. But Romney himself made a fortune.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/la-pn-labor-union-targets-romney-florida-ad-20120120,0,5096646.story
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:33pmIf you are basing your judgement on Mitts experience, then surely you must also consider his political experience as an executive. That experience points to progressiveness. His family tree is progressive. And, no conservative could ever get elected to statewide office in Massachusetts.
Report Post »Consistency in logic is required.
senior74
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:35pmIf Romney gets in we will have the same EPA because Gina McCarthy was working for Romney & now works for for Obama. Also John Holden worked for Romney & is now Obamas science czar. It’s the EPA that is pushing the UN sustainable development Agenda 21. I believe if we get another president that’s for the agenda we will be part of a communist one world gov.
Report Post »There is a utube of Romney saying global warming is caused by humans & this is whats behind the UN Agenda 21!
Buck Shane
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 2:39pmRomney is a big government progressive.
ROMNECARE!
Report Post »outofthemire93
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 2:53pmJust what is it about Santorum’s “personality” that prevents him from “successfully selling it to the voters”? I really don’t get it. Apparently there are alot of people that voted for him in Iowa. I think it’s time “Republicans” stop being so blinded by certain traits of candidates and fail to see the big picture. The main thing we need to beat Obama is someone WITHOUT a sordid past and some true integrity. Neither Mitt nor Newt fits that bill. And Santorum is the only one I actually believe when he speaks.
Report Post »CaliforniaD
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 5:31pmPeople who know Newt Gingrich well don’t like him. People who know Mitt Romney well like him a lot. That tells me a great deal.
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:15pm“Fox & Friends Weekend“ Two gays and a fox.
Report Post »BlondeFrenzy
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:19pmLol
Report Post »Joe Schmuck
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:38pmGood eye!
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:15pmMaybe it‘s something related to Newt’s corruption?
Newt Gingrich was under FBI investigation for bribery
Little known to the American public Newt Gingrich and his then wife Marianne were the subject of a US Justice Department criminal investigation in the late 1990s involving a $10 million bribe of the world’s largest private arms dealer, Sarkis Soghanalia.
Unaware that Soghanalian was an FBI informant, it is alleged that Marianne Gingrich whilst working for the Israel Export Development Corporation (IEDC) tried to facilitate a bribe to the tune of $10 million so that her husband could use his influence to lift the arms embargo against Iraq in order for Soghanalian to collect an outstanding payment of $54 million from Saddam Hussein.
—————–
Newt Gingrich once spoke at an Alzheimer’s conference sponsored by PositiveID (PSID), the human microchip implant company that came under fire for injecting 200 Alzheimer’s patients with wireless chips in Florida without properly obtaining their consent.
Reminds me of Perry and Guardasil
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505123_162-42848437/hey-remember-when-newt-gingrich-was-sponsored-by-a-human-chip-implant-company/
Report Post »WhereAreRomeysTaxReturns
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:24pmAnother baseless attack from Bishop Romney’s robots.
The Bishop is about to be checkmated in the SC.
Go back to your roots in Mexico, Bishop and rejoin your Mormon clan there.
Report Post »kalayaan
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 3:09amGingrich for President!!!
Report Post »mmcdonald628
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:14pmI could not care less about Mitt Romney’s tax returns. I hope he didn‘t pay one cent to the Federal Gov’t.
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:14pmFox is pro-Romney, period.
Report Post »salvawhoray
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:18pmyes, fox had sold out and are no better than CNN and others.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:13pmSame ole tactic — attack the question rather than ANSWER the question
Bill O’Reilly & Mike Huckabee Admit There’s No Difference Between Romney, Gingrich & Santorum
http://c4lrutherford.org/2012/01/21/bill-oreilly-mike-huckabee-admit-theres-no-difference-between-romney-gingrich-santorum/
Report Post »MSGT
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:17pmI guess to you Beckbots Bork was unfit for the SCOTUS
Report Post »120pages
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:28pmLike O’Reilly and Huckabee are supposed to mean something?
O’Reilly still brags about the “tough” interview he did with President Obama which was nothing but softball questions and him kissing up to the President. It was almost like O’Reilly had a school-boy crush on the President.
Huckabee just needs to shut up!! He is not a Conservative and should never be looked to for any type of presidential political analysis especially after what he and John McCain did in West Virginia in 2008.
Report Post »outofthemire93
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 3:04pmI believe there IS a difference between Gingrich, Romney and Santorum and that is Obama will absolutely win the propaganda war against Gingrich AND Romney, as two quintessential politicians. So much to work with! With Santorum they would have a lot harder time portraying him in a negative light except of course the whole gay thing, which is a non issue. They are licking their chops at the prospect of Romney or Gingrich.
Report Post »whatthecrazy
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:11pmYawn
Report Post »mmcdonald628
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:10pmWHO CARES ABOUT ROMNEY’S TAX RECORDS!!
Quite frankly, I hope he didn’t pay one cent to the Feds. Probably will make me like him more.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:16pmAt least Romney‘s flips aren’t associated with money pay-outs like Gingrich’s flips!
Report Post »Fighting4America
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:17pmright on!!
Report Post »auntbea
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:17pmHow did you get your Caps past The Blaze police?
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:26pmI think the rule is that a post can’t be ALL CAPS
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:36pmAt least when Newt was in congress , he didn’t continually vote against a bill that was loaded with his districts Pork Farm. Then knowing it was going to pass, point out that he voted against it. A real libertarian would have returned All the PORK.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:49pmYou don’t understand PORK (earmarks).
Earmarks are money that’s going to be spent one way or another.
States vie for the money.
Ron Paul’s votes reflected that.
Money not allocated to the STATES went directly to the PRESIDENT to use however he wants.
Got it?
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 2:07pmAs a Progressive , Marxist, , Don’t get it, Liberal, non Pure , 40 year Republican, right now I am looking at Four More Years.
Report Post »Steelhead
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:06pmI hope Newt is the republican nominee . America will not vote for this angry old skirt chaser.
Report Post »auntbea
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:12pmJust young skirt chasers.
Report Post »Bunk
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:18pmWhy not? They voted for a lying Socialist!
Report Post »Fighting4America
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:18pmyou are correct Steelhead. I guess that means you like BO so I am guessing this will be the only time we agree.
Report Post »not funny
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:31pmI hope Anyone But Obama is elected in 2012. We can’t afford to have another –or worse– four years like ones we have just suffered.
Report Post »outofthemire93
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 3:07pmBingo! They will not no way never in a million years! Newt supporters WAKE up!
Report Post »Agnes
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:16pmGo ahead and vote again for the fraud clown in Washington – the one that has not diclosed any college transcripts; the one that no classmate recognizes him from any of the schools he attended; the one that it is very questionable where exactly he was born; the one that attended Rev. Wright’s church for over 20 years; etc. etc.
Report Post »