Politics

Mitt Romney Sweeps New Hampshire Primary

CONCORD, N.H. (The Blaze/AP) — Mitt Romney cruised to a solid victory in the New Hampshire primary Tuesday night, improving on his first-place finish in the lead-off Iowa caucuses and firmly establishing himself as the man to beat for the Republican presidential nomination.

As of Tuesday late-evening Romney has garnered 38 percent of the vote, however, those seeking to undermine his winning-streak, such as former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, have suggested that anything below 40 percent would indicate weakness by the front-runner.

They didn’t mention that Sen. John McCain’s winning percentage in the 2008 primary was 37 percent.

“Tonight we made history,” Romney told cheering supporters before pivoting to a stinging denunciation of President Barack Obama. “The middle class has been crushed,” in the past three years, he said, “our debt is too high and our opportunities too few” – remarks that made clear he intends to be viewed as the party’s nominee in waiting after only two contests.

His rivals said otherwise, looking ahead to South Carolina on Jan. 21 as the place to stop the former Massachusetts governor.

Even so, the order of finish – Ron Paul second, followed by Jon Huntsman, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum – scrambled the field and prolonged the increasingly desperate competition to emerge as the true conservative rival to Romney.

Romney fashioned his victory despite a sustained assault by rivals eager to undermine his claim as the contender best situated to beat Obama and help reduce the nation’s painfully high unemployment.

Returns from 33 percent of New Hampshire precincts showed Romney with 37 percent of the vote, followed by Texas Rep Paul with 24 percent, former Utah Gov. Huntsman with 17 percent and former House Speaker Gingrich and former Pennsylvania Sen. Santorum with 10 percent each. With his victory, Romney became the first Republican to sweep the first two contests in competitive races since Iowa gained the lead-off spot in presidential campaigns in 1976.

Romney battled not only his rivals but also high expectations as the ballots were counted, particularly since his pursuers had virtually conceded New Hampshire, next-door to the state he governed for four years.

“Tonight we celebrate,” Romney told his supporters. “Tomorrow we go back to work.”

Rightly so. Already, candidates and political action committees aligned with them were reserving enormous amounts of television time for the first-in-the-South primary in little more than a week.

Unlike Iowa and New Hampshire, where unemployment is well below the national average, joblessness is far higher in South Carolina. That creates a different political environment for the race.

 

 

 

Comments (432)

1 2 3 ... 8
  • NILAP
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:29pm

    A good percentage of conservatives will never vote for Romney which will ensure the election of Obama. They will stay home, vote third party and some even for Obama. We had a Romney with George W. Bush for 8 years.

    Report Post » NILAP  
    • disenlightened
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:33pm

      I think you underestimate the intelligence of most conservatives. I believe they‘re much smarter than you’re willing to give them credit for.

      Report Post » disenlightened  
    • WakingSheep
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:38pm

      Yeah they’ll vote smarter than that. They’ll vote Ron Paul. :)

      Report Post »  
    • copatriots
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:42pm

      Looks like the Establishment and the media is getting their guy. This is GOP payback time for Romney bowing out of the race the last time. No sense in arguing amongst yourselves. The voting process is hijacked. Obama will be re-elected. God help us all and have mercy on us.

      Report Post »  
    • ElPzee
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:43pm

      @nilap.

      Also we went the big government moderate candidate in 2008, we lost.
      If we do it again in 2012, Obama wins.

      Report Post » ElPzee  
    • Scottsman
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:50pm

      Nice work Ron Paul! I noticed that Mitt Romney is now “borrowing” Ron Paul’s principles just now as he is talking on Fox News. He is now talking “Founding Fathers”, good for Mitt. I like him OK, 2nd place in my book. He should embrace Ron Paul more.

      Report Post »  
    • disenlightened
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:50pm

      It’s a two man race now – Mitt and Magoo :)

      Report Post » disenlightened  
    • Sleazy Hippo
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:50pm

      1- There is no such thing as an “Intelligent Conservative’
      2- Santorum “won” Iowa
      3- Obama’s administration will wipe the floor with the Romney Record

      God Bless “Jesus Rick” Perry

      TEA

      Report Post » Sleazy Hippo  
    • READRIGHTHERE
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:50pm

      Ross Perot was not that long ago. Your assessment seems illogical.

      Report Post »  
    • db321
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:55pm

      A lot smarter – if Romney is our candidate I will go door to door supporting him – Obama must go and Romney will only have 4 years to prove himself – if one ounce of Rino comes out – I’ll go door to door to try to replace him.

      FYI – I just turned over to MSNBC for a moment – they discovered something new in Romney speech – he used a Telepromtor – they said he would not know how to put sentences together without it.

      Debate On – Romney vs Obama – No Teleprompter – let see if MSNBC is right or will they be wrong once again!

      Report Post » db321  
    • FreedomPurveyor
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:55pm

      “Also we went the big government moderate candidate in 2008, we lost.”

      Funny how quickly people forget the contrast between candidates after just four years. Romney was the alternative to McCain last time, and yet now people try to portray Romney as the same as McCain, in a desperate attempt to connect Romney with losing to Obama.

      Romney is the only candidate who routinely performs well vs. Obama in polls, and voters who are most concerned with electability pick Romney overwhelmingly.

      Report Post » FreedomPurveyor  
    • ElPzee
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:06pm

      @freedom. Your right, McCain and romney aren’t the same; ROMNEY IS FAR MORE LEFT WING THAN MCCAIN.

      Report Post » ElPzee  
    • ElPzee
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:09pm

      @DB

      Romney would be made to look like an intellectual infant in a debate against Obama.

      Romney has no speaking ability(why he flounders every debate), and comes of as unintelligent.

      Report Post » ElPzee  
    • theaveng
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:14pm

      I thought Santorum was 1st in Iowa?
      (They awarded him 20 more votes…. a 12 ballot lead.)

      Report Post »  
    • kapnkd
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:21pm

      Not really, Donald Duck, Mickey Mouse or even Alfred E. Neuman will get conservatives’ vote over Obozocommie!

      Report Post » kapnkd  
    • wbalzley
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:27pm

      Yes they will…Romney-Paul 2012

      Report Post »  
    • Chappy123
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:38pm

      Which was better?

      Stay at home or vote for the 3rd party and welcome 4 more years.

      Report Post »  
    • Freedomluver
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:42pm

      Seems there are a whole lot of “useful idiots” who completely forgot about the Patriot Act, the NDAA that allows for YOUR arrest with no warrant, no charges, no witnesses, no jury, and no trial. These same folks who complain about the TSA, and yet they are more than willing to vote for a candidate who PRAISES such insanity.

      Romney will only expand on what Obama has done to the constitution, and there is only one candidate left in the field who will fight for the Bill of Rights.

      If you vote for anyone other than Ron Paul, and find yourself waiting to in line to go to your local Social Security office, football game, bus station….ect, only to become the victim of a strip search for the simple right to enter, you will only have yourself to blame.

      Vote Ron Paul…or be willing to drop your pants whenever Big Brother demands it.

      Report Post » Freedomluver  
    • ScratInTheHat
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:44pm

      Here comes cap and trade, the GOP approved government healthcare system that will replace that mean old Obama healthcare system, four more years of open borders (you do realize Romney is lying about doing anything don’t you) and more Keynesian BS in an Austrian mask. God we are stupid!

      Report Post » ScratInTheHat  
    • Freedomluver
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:56pm

      @FreedomPurveyor

      So in other words, you are more than willing to vote for Romney, even though he is all for the TSA and strip searching anyone and everyone with ZERO probable cause in direct violation of the 4th amendment…correct?

      Tell us…what is Romney’s position regarding the NDAA?

      Hhhhhmmm.

      Tell us…what does it feel like to back a candidate who is more than willing to spit on the constitution?

      Report Post » Freedomluver  
    • loki1830
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 10:00pm

      So a conservative will vote for Bama? Lol
      Romney will bring them in from both sides. He is a uniter not a divider!

      Report Post »  
    • sb36695
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 10:04pm

      I’m as conservative as it gets. ANYBODY BUT OBAMA! And I will crawl through broken glass to vote.

      Report Post »  
    • Freedomluver
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 10:05pm

      @loki1830

      You mean “united” behind the NDAA?

      Tell us…what is Romney’s position regarding this totally unconstitutional law?

      Report Post » Freedomluver  
    • Freedomluver
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 10:14pm

      @sb36695

      So in other words…you would be more than willing to vote for a candidate who supports the government’s right to arrest YOU with no charges, no witnesses, no jury, no trial, no jury, and no release date….correct?

      Who other than Ron Paul stands against this?

      Report Post » Freedomluver  
    • SinisterDuck
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 10:17pm

      I will vote for Paul or whoever the Libertarian Party puts up. The Republicans and Democrats are on the same team… against freedom and against the American people.

      Report Post »  
    • C. Schwehr
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 10:20pm

      This is just the opening round. You sound like you‘ve already bowed under to the progressive propaganda trying to tell you that you’ve already lost….It aint over until the Fat First Lady sings!

      Report Post »  
    • C. Schwehr
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 10:22pm

      SLEAZY HIPPO: What an appropriate name for such an ignorant TROLL

      Report Post »  
    • hauschild
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 10:29pm

      Is it time to “rally” folks?

      I said I won’t vote for a RINO in the general, but I might reconsider. I really hate the thought of not moving forward almost as much as another term of Marxism. My original thinking was that turning a RINO loose looks good at the surface, but the roots remain deep and entrenched. What then happens after a term of RINOism when things below the surface haven’t really changed and the other side digs in deeper? Where’s the contrast that could ultimately be drawn that illustrates perfectly the inherent flaws in liberlism – exactly what happened when Reagan put the boots to Carter? Even people leaning left had to give up their charade at that point.

      I really dislike having to throw 4 more years down the drain to prove a point, but that might be what it takes.

      Report Post »  
    • Freedomluver
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 10:40pm

      @hauschild

      If it takes 4 more years to “prove a point”, so be it.

      Nothing will change until we all stand up and make a statement.

      I voted for RINO’s enough to finally grasp the fact that until they learn their lesson, nothing will change.

      Report Post » Freedomluver  
    • This_Individual
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 10:47pm

      SINISTERDUCK – Here ya go, http://www.garyjohnson2012.com/

      http://www.lp.org/

      Report Post »  
    • kconservative
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 10:59pm

      Didnt take long for Beck to revert back to his 2008 ways, and start schilling for Romney. Sorry, But Romney wont overturn the NDAA, Romney wont stop SOPA, Romney wont stop the new EX Patritization Act… Romney wont end the FED, Romney wont end our world policing. Romney is just more of the Same, and judging by everyones lack of enthusiasm for him… I would say they all know its true. Thats why I invite everyone to do what BECK and crew need to do. GET BACK TO OUR FOUNDING PRINCIPLES.. DOES THAT RING A BELL GLENN. Only one candidate was against Tarp, talks of Liberty, and our founding Priciples. As far as Iran Goes, He says if congress sends us to war then we go to war., but also he would allow Isreal to do what it needs to do in the region. Time to stand for your principles. You elect Romney we will have even less rights then we do now by time his administration is over.

      Report Post »  
    • Unc68
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 11:10pm

      The big contenders will slowly bow out and put their push behind Romney jaut as they always do after the dog and poney show is in full swing and people think their votes actually count. You will see Newt cheering on Romney as if he never opposed him and like with McCane they will put up the biggest RINO and like with McCane I will not submit to their will and I will vote my mind, not my fear.

      Report Post »  
    • lel2007
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 11:17pm

      Now how in hell would you know what the majority of conservatives will do should Romney win the nomination. With a reported 33% of Americans, obama’s re-election is their biggest fear for 2012. Real conservative do not stay home and refuse to vote because their favorite didn’t get the nomination, and certainly would not even consider voting for the communist. Replace ‘conservatives’ with ‘Ron Paul supporters’ in your comment and it begins to sound plausible.

      Report Post » lel2007  
    • HoggKilla
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 11:18pm

      I personally dont care for Romney. But… at this point in our country’s history, Is the other choice…BHO, really better? Judging from the comments, I guess we’ll never have the perfect candidate for the GOP. While we conservatives gripe and moan over the perfect person, the DEMS will win again. In 2013, we’ll all live in a different america. All because none of us could unite the party for the sake of our country’s future.

      Sure… Romney, Paul, Sant, Ging, Perry all have their hang-ups. But really?? We would be better off with BHO?? This is not the time to experiment with another 4 year w/BHO. 4 years ago I would agree with “anyone but McCain”. NOW…. everyone needs to seriously consider the alternative.

      Report Post » HoggKilla  
    • SinisterDuck
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 11:26pm

      @kconservative
      re.:
      “Didnt take long for Beck to revert back to his 2008 ways, and start schilling for Romney.”…

      I agree. I am very disappointed with Beck…

      Report Post »  
    • OhSnappage
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 11:28pm

      I cannot speak for all conservatives (like you apparently can) but as a conservative I will vote for whomever runs against Obama. Not third party.

      If it must be Romney, who is just another John Kerry, I will hold my nose and do it. My ideal candidate was Bachmann. Now I must look towards Santorum. If that too must change then so be it. Any of the GOP is better than the corruption, divisiveness, arrogance, lies, and backwards policies that we currently have.

      Report Post » OhSnappage  
    • Cause4Liberty
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 11:33pm

      @blazers. Romney = Obama. Only thing different is money and color of skin.

      Report Post » Cause4Liberty  
    • SinisterDuck
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 11:35pm

      @HoggKilla
      re.:
      “I personally dont care for Romney. But… at this point in our country’s history, Is the other choice…BHO, really better?”…

      this voting for the ‘lesser of two evils’ compromise stuff is just as dangerous as voting for BHO. the only thing you’re really voting for is the speed at which this country crumbles.

      Report Post »  
    • jb.kibs
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 11:54pm

      keep voting for the lesser of 2 evils until the only choice is pure evil… good game.

      Report Post »  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 12:00am

      Wrong! only Paulsbots would be stupid enough to let Obama have another 4yrs

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • JJ Coolay
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 12:19am

      @blazers. Romney = Obama. Only thing different is money and color of skin.
      ____________________________________

      WRONG!
      Did you see Romney’s victory speech tonight???
      Completely inspiring and totally separating himself from BHO.
      The 2 are nothing alike.

      ROMNEY 2012!!

      Report Post » JJ Coolay  
    • americanfirst
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 12:20am

      This conservative from Texxus will be voting for Mitt Romney!

      Like to see an Allen West/Marco Rubio or even a Chris Christie Veep!

      Texans for Romney 2012!!

      Report Post »  
    • zman173rd
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 12:29am

      I feel kinda lost. We’re falling into the same trap as we have for decades. Romney is way too left of the rest of them which tells me that‘s why the media isn’t putting him away the way they did to the others. We’re letting the media tell us who to vote for. We continually vote for Professional politicians and then complain about professional politicians. It’s Too Late. We WILL become a Socialist society MORE than we are now. We will actually call our country socialist. I keep reading about the hope a lot of you have. I hear it all over. “Don’t worry; we the people won’t stand for it”. “We’ll take up arms to protect our rights as citizens”. You haven’t yet and look at the rights that have been taken away so far. Think how much your freedoms were and meant to you 30 or 40 years ago and compare that to today. A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT COUNRTY. The gradual dumbing down and knuckling under isn’t going to be cleared up by anyone like Romney or Gingrich or Huntsman or Perry. I even have doubts about Santorum but he’s my only holdout at this point. It’s almost a waste of time. Vote for the ONLY republican running and you’ll get what they want to feed you; the same ol’ SOS. Ron Paul scares the hell out of me but he can only do what the constitution and the house of reps allow him to do. There are constraints and restraints built in to the system that only dictators try to maneuver around, with the help of the media. Ron Paul won’t have the medina in his bac

      Report Post » zman173rd  
    • PoliticiansRCrooks
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 12:50am

      In one of the debates, they were all asked if Obama did the right thing to do when he killed 2 American Citizens with a drone. Every candidate on stage said Yes except for Paul. So I would say the same situation regarding to the NDAA being passed. Bachman voted Yes for it.

      Report Post » PoliticiansRCrooks  
    • FLDeb
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 2:57am

      The elite republicans in charge are behind this and that is the main reason I refuse to be listed as an r. In FL because I am listed as NPO I am not allowed to vote in the primaries, but refuse to vote for who ever the gop endorses. Last time around they tried to shove McCain down our throats and I relented at the last minute and voted for him. Not this time. I refuse to be told who to vote for. And it will not be Romney.

      Report Post » FLDeb  
    • Ronko
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 7:58am

      It‘s probably better that Obama wins even though he’s a radical tyrant. By having Obama win we don’t have Rommey or GWBII be in for 4 years but then have another radical Dem beat him in 2016. Let Obama stay for 4 more years then Christie can destroy the next Dem Canadite and be president for 8 years and fix the problems this nation has.

      Report Post »  
    • Simonne
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 8:07am

      He did great with conservatives last night because many of us do support Mitt.

      Report Post »  
    • G.W. Dobbs
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:14am

      What a MESS; we will have a choice between TWO PROGRESSIVE SOCIALISTS. Where is Justice? Romneycare or Obamacare? It does not matter; both will END this Country.

      Report Post »  
    • KTsayz
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:18am

      Lionel said the election is rigged

      http://www.wpix.com/wpix-lionel-on-pix-gallery,0,5078472.story

      Ron Paul 18 – 29 yo 47%
      Romney 18 – 29 yo 25%

      Ron Paul 18 – 24 yo 47%
      Romney 18 – 24 yo 26%

      Ron Paul Independent vote 31%
      Romney Independent cote 27%

      Clearly, Ron Paul could beat Obummer because he is getting the 18-29 yo and Independent voters and Romney IS NOT!!
      Ron Paul 2012!!

      Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:36am

      Poll: Only candidates Romney, Paul Tie Obama

      By Steven Shepard
      Updated: January 9, 2012 | 7:02 p.m.
      January 9, 2012 | 6:50 p.m.

      http://www.nationaljournal.com/2012-presidential-campaign/poll-romney-paul-tie-obama-20120109

      Report Post »  
    • DEG
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:28am

      I agree, there is no way I will be fooled into voting for a non conservative candidate again. If we are going to have a president that is for gun control, socialized medicine, global warming mandates, that will liberal judges appointments, I would rather it be a democrat.

      Report Post »  
    • tommygun21
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 1:08pm

      Agree
      Remember laws originate in Congress, if the House and the Senate pass a repeal of Obamacare do you think Romney will Veto it? same with Dodd/Frank, we can get a heck of a lot accomplished with Romney as president. Not time to stick your heads in the sand or grab your toys and go home, time to get louder

      Report Post » tommygun21  
    • MissJill
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 3:02pm

      I don’t know who stammers more with their words… Romney or Paul? So sad, thought I would never say this, but Fox News is to Romney as MSNBC is to Obama. Keep up the good work Newt and hang in there!! Let Romney have it with all you got!! I want to see a rottweiler not a poodle like McCain was 4 years ago.

      Report Post »  
    • maryanne3935
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 6:53pm

      If they don’t vote for Romney they get Obama. How has that worked out fo r this country. Are we going to give him the “gun and bullets to kill us?” We can ‘t be stupid, we did that in 2008, we got smarter in 2010, and now we are going to not support our GOP candidate. How dumb are the American people. IDIOTS

      Report Post »  
  • loveoursoldiers
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:29pm

    OVERLOAD!
    I don’t care anymore.. I just want the snakes out of the WH.. I don’t care who goes in.. as long the commie is replaced

    Report Post » loveoursoldiers  
    • Roaran
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:44pm

      Another commie will go in with that attitude, only difference is the R instead of the D.

      Report Post »  
    • Freedomluver
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 10:33pm

      @loveoursoldiers

      If you were given the choice between Mao and Mussolini, who would you chose?

      This is the choice that the “establishment” is attempting to foist upon you.

      The only candidate who sticks out like a sore thumb is Ron Paul…and for obvious reasons.

      Report Post » Freedomluver  
    • jb.kibs
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 11:55pm

      it’s Ron Paul, or don’t vote at all.

      Report Post »  
    • NIPPOHIPS
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 7:06am

      Whats the big surprise here? Romney is the white GOP version of Obama the Establishment wants.

      Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:39am

      The problem is that Romney is Obama-lite. Nothing would change.

      Report Post »  
  • whatthecrazy
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:28pm

    Just out of curiosity could some of you Ron Paul people tell me who would he choose as a V.P i mean that must be as important as anything is as we all can see that it might not be long before his mind skips to da loo and we are left with Who?

    Report Post »  
    • Br@dley
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:44pm

      someone anti-fed. might even be a democrat like kucinich or grayson. ending the fed and military industrial complex are the 1st steps toward restoration as they are the primary drivers of the national debt.

      Report Post » Br@dley  
    • West Coast Patriot
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:47pm

      It is hard to say, that would be his choice and his choice only, but names that come to my mind are: Judge Andrew Napalitano, Jesse Ventura, Peter Schiff, Gary Johnson, and I wish that it could be Rand Paul, but I am not sure what the country as a whole would think about a father/son team in the White House.

      Report Post » West Coast Patriot  
    • NoNannyState4me
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:56pm

      Gary Johnson ALL THE WAY

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Johnson

      Paul/Johnson 2012!!!

      Report Post » NoNannyState4me  
    • the_ancient
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:58pm

      Rand Paul would never Accept a VP Position right now, He just got in to the Senate and has Alot of work he wants to do there.

      Jesse Ventura is a Crackpot and would never be offered a VP Spot,

      Judge Andrew / Peter Schiff, maybe but I doubt it

      Gary Johnson is a Strong Possibility.

      Report Post » the_ancient  
    • West Coast Patriot
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:07pm

      The_Ancient, I tend to agree with you. Johnson and Paul have views that are really close to each other. They would make a good ticket in my view.

      Report Post » West Coast Patriot  
    • cous1933
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:17pm

      In 2008 after Ron Paul dropped out of the race he endorsed the Constitution Party candidate, Chuck Baldwin. I really like Baldwin, I think he would be great. Peter Schiff would be great. Despite a few minor disagreements I think Jim Demint would be great. Other like-minded liberty loving patriots that could be great in cabinet positions are Andrew Napolitano, Colonel Douglas Macgregor, Karen Kwiatkowski, Michael Scheuer, and Tom Woods. (Little political experience among them but brilliant minds and incorruptable integrity.)

      Report Post » cous1933  
    • cous1933
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:23pm

      By the way crazy,
      Dr. Pauls mind is still extremely sharp and has many more good years on it.

      Report Post » cous1933  
    • louise
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:38pm

      Whatthecrazy,
      Andrew Napolitano would make a great VP for Ron Paul.
      Here is a great video. Just one of many. Enjoy

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eD_ybaXhXno&feature=youtu.be

      Report Post » louise  
    • hallkbrdz
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 10:10pm

      I think Dr Coburn might be a good pairing.

      Two doctors…

      Report Post » hallkbrdz  
    • C. Schwehr
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 10:28pm

      BR@DLEY: The military is driving the debt???????? You’re sooo funny! Try looking at all of the giveaway programs that the Constitution doesn’t support that are driving the debt. The unfunded debt of the Medicare program ALONE would bankrupt the government! Even with a $600 billion defense bill, that’s less than 1/4th of the total budget…..WHERE DOES THE REST GO TO?????

      Report Post »  
    • Bri 3D
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 10:48pm

      To the guys that mentioned Schiff,

      How much fun would it be to watch Schiff debate Biden?

      I see him in more of an economic advisor role though.
      I would love to see Napalitano on the supreme court.

      And to answer the question, Johnson would be good but like someone else said, they would have to oppose the federal reserve. If you don’t fix that, nothing else will matter.
      Imagine what a Paul/Kucinich ticket would do to bring this country together

      Report Post »  
    • martinez012577
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 11:09pm

      Well I have been thinking of this alot. I think President Ron Paul will go with a military guy. Most people are concerned with his foreign affairs plan and a former military man that shares his ideals would be best. I would love for the Judge to be AG. I would love Schiff would be great running the treasury. Rand needs to stay where he is because the good doctor will need his help getting his agenda passed.

      Report Post » martinez012577  
    • jb.kibs
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 11:55pm

      it’s illegal to choose a VP until you are the nomination.

      Report Post »  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 12:21am

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4DRZP9JgBA
      Ron Paul-Kucinich 2012

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • KTsayz
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 1:01am

      The Judge already said he would accept a seat on SCOTUS – and THAT is where he belongs!!

      Report Post »  
    • bigspike
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 5:58am

      possibly daffy duck, perhaps tupac…who knows what that crazy old coot might do?

      Report Post » bigspike  
  • disenlightened
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:27pm

    Embrace the Mitt.

    Report Post » disenlightened  
    • Restored One
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:34pm

      We will have to if he is the only who can FIRE OBAMA. I have yet to jump on that train though.

      Report Post »  
    • ElPzee
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:44pm

      @restored 1.

      Romney can’t win. 1 Debate against Obama and Romney is over.

      Report Post » ElPzee  
    • NoNannyState4me
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:22pm

      Obama and Romney in a debate would be like seeing a negative film image of Obama talking to himself.

      Report Post » NoNannyState4me  
    • West Coast Patriot
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:30pm

      I Ron paul does not get the nod, I hope he runs third party or teams with Johnson. I would vote either, but I will not vote for a candidate that gets his support from Goldman Sachs, Credit Suisse Group, Morgan Stanley, HIG Capital, Barclays, Kirkland & Ellis, Bank of America, PriceWaterhouseCoopers, EMC Corp, JPMorgan Chase. He is bought and paid for. They all were bailed out!!! What is wrong with people?

      Report Post » West Coast Patriot  
    • warriorspirit
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 10:15pm

      ***Fans of Mitt Romney***

      Just wanted to give you all an idea of who will be running this country if your pretty boy wins. Remember once he gets in office he will need to start “paying back” these top donors (just like Obama did with GE and others) At least I know which stocks to buy, lol.

      Goldman Sachs $367,200
      Credit Suisse Group $203,750
      Morgan Stanley $199,800
      HIG Capital $186,500
      Barclays $157,750
      Kirkland & Ellis $132,100
      Bank of America $126,500
      PriceWaterhouseCoopers $118,250
      EMC Corp $117,300
      JPMorgan Chase & Co $112,250
      The Villages $97,500
      Vivint Inc $80,750
      Marriott International $79,837
      Sullivan & Cromwell $79,250
      Bain Capital $74,500
      UBS AG $73,750
      Wells Fargo $61,500
      Blackstone Group $59,800
      Citigroup Inc $57,050
      Bain & Co $52,500

      Report Post »  
    • martinez012577
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 11:51pm

      Nah, I think I will embrace the only candidate that is for the Constitution and has a past history of following it. Not some fake that says things now because he is trying to get votes.

      Report Post » martinez012577  
    • jb.kibs
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 12:12am

      Romney wants to start Trade Wars which always leads to real wars… how mature are these “leaders’? Do they have the mentality and social understanding of 10 year olds? i’m dead serious…

      you don’t stop arguments, stop fights or make peace by initiating force or ultimatums on anyone. ever.
      peace, extortion does not make…

      for all Star Trek Fans: The Prime Directive is that of a non interventionalist ideal. look into it. no matter how “well meaning” it seems, history proves, it always ends in disaster to intervene in another civilizations evolutionary process.

      Make the RIGHT choice. 4God and 4Liberty, Ron Paul.

      Report Post »  
  • NILAP
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:25pm

    A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for Mitt Romney. All Paul supporters are Romney supporters and Obama supporters. Paul never attacks Romney.

    Report Post » NILAP  
    • eyestoseeearstohear
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:33pm

      You mean….Paul never attacks OBAMA!

      And, YES…..the “young bubble-heads” that voted for Obama in 2008
      ARE THE SAME BUBBLE-HEADS VOTING FOR PAUL…
      THEY ARE DOING A ” BAIT & SWITCH”…AND IN THE LAST MINUTES
      TURN IT OVER TO OBAMA.

      So sad!

      Report Post »  
    • WakingSheep
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:36pm

      A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for the Constitution.

      A vote for any other is a promise of more war and more government.

      Report Post »  
    • Br@dley
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:45pm

      anyone but obama=mitt romney, a mantra which i am sure you have echoed.

      romney=4 more years of obama.

      ron paul or bust.

      Report Post » Br@dley  
    • the_ancient
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:49pm

      A vote for Santorum is a Vote for Theocracy, War, and Big Government

      A Vote for Mitt Romney is a Vote for War and Big Government

      A Vote for Ron Paul is a Vote for the Constitution, Return to Founding Principles, and a Hope for a Prosperous Future

      Report Post » the_ancient  
    • ElPzee
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:50pm

      Ron Paul is the only reason Romney is doing so good.
      There should be some requirements for running as a republican so non-republican hacks like paul can’t doom us to Obama

      Report Post » ElPzee  
    • Br@dley
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:53pm

      elpzee,

      do you have any idea how ridiculous that sounds? jesus, the GOP field is GARBAGE with the noteable exception of ron paul.

      mitt romney just looks pretty and most people are superficial like that.

      Report Post » Br@dley  
    • ElPzee
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:57pm

      @ Br@dley.

      Ron paul is the worst conservative candidate in the history of the Rep party. Even worse than rick perry

      Report Post » ElPzee  
    • NoNannyState4me
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:57pm

      BS, dude. Ronnie all the way. Mitt is a sell out big government tool.

      Report Post » NoNannyState4me  
    • circleDwagons
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:07pm

      @elpzee, Question for you. Where do you want Ron Paul and his supporters to go? Can romney beat obama without Paulies? 1st. choice Paul/ ? 2012, 2nd. choice romney/ Dr. Rand Paul 2012

      Report Post » circleDwagons  
    • ElPzee
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:12pm

      @circledwagon.

      I Believe that the majority of Paul supporters will vote for Obama, especially the young Paulnuts

      Report Post » ElPzee  
    • NoNannyState4me
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:21pm

      @elp

      I am a 42 yr old college grad that served 4 yrs, own a business, love the 2nd, 4th and 10th amendments very dearly and know WAY more people voting for Paul that are like me that what you describe. :)

      Report Post » NoNannyState4me  
    • WAKEUPUSA2012
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:48pm

      ElPzee

      Ron Paul is for small government. Obama is for big government. No Paul supporter in 2012 is going to vote for Obama.

      Report Post » WAKEUPUSA2012  
    • Br@dley
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:50pm

      indeed,

      30
      9-year vet
      college attendee

      ron paul supporter since 2007 (when i was active duty)

      Report Post » Br@dley  
    • TheWholeTruth
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 10:27pm

      ELPZEE
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:57pm
      @ Br@dley.

      Ron paul is the worst conservative candidate in the history of the Rep party. Even worse than rick perry

      you might want to check this out. Paul is the MOST conservative member of the House/Senate (1937-2002 when the ‘study’ if you want to call it that was done) out of 3,320 members number 1 being the most liberal to 3,320 being most conservative… guess where Paul came in? YEP 3,320th!!!

      I could give you the sites, but naaa.. just google.. Ron Paul most conservative.. you’ll get plenty of hits.

      Report Post »  
    • This_Individual
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 10:49pm

      A vote for anyone other then Ron Paul is a vote for another statist.
      If he doesn’t get the nomination, I’ll be voting Libertarian.

      Report Post »  
    • Bri 3D
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 10:54pm

      You’re showing your ignorance BIG TIME !
      Obama = Romney.
      Paul supporters are polar opposites of the big gov’t bank owned puppets.
      They will not fall for the whole “vote for the less of two evil’s” nonsense.

      Report Post »  
    • jb.kibs
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 12:14am

      Romeny’s contributions speak for themselves.

      how many of them did WE, “The People”, bail out, hence WE are funding this DB’s campaign.

      Goldman Sachs $367,200
      Credit Suisse Group $203,750
      Morgan Stanley $199,800
      HIG Capital $186,500
      Barclays $157,750
      Kirkland & Ellis $132,100
      Bank of America $126,500
      PriceWaterhouseCoopers $118,250
      EMC Corp $117,300
      JPMorgan Chase & Co $112,250
      The Villages $97,500
      Vivint Inc $80,750
      Marriott International $79,837
      Sullivan & Cromwell $79,250
      Bain Capital $74,500
      UBS AG $73,750
      Wells Fargo $61,500
      Blackstone Group $59,800
      Citigroup Inc $57,050
      Bain & Co $52,500

      Report Post »  
    • Simonne
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 8:09am

      I don’t like Paul or Obama but I support Romney.

      Report Post »  
    • Clara88
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 9:20am

      “worse than Rick Perry”?? Gov Perry is the ONLY fiscal conservative IN this race with the record to prove it. He {Volunteered} to serve his country and is a veteran of the U S Air Force. He could pilot Air Force One if he wanted to. He IS The Tea Party Candidate.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYpJ65T3NmY

      http://www.rickperry.org/

      Report Post » Clara88  
  • THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:21pm

    I challenge you.. Look at what the mormons really are and what they really believe. If you look into you will see how crazy AND unelectable romney is. The mefia isn’t covering it for one or two reasons.
    First reason..they are hoping romney gets the nomination and AFTER he does they will conveniently decide to report on this…Or second reason is that if the American people really knew what beliefs and things this cult does, romney would be polling at about .000005%.

    I have to laugh as they have painted another canidate as crazy and unelectable…but once you pull of the mask of deception the TRUTH is very clear.

    Report Post » THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE  
    • ALL4FREEDOM
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:32pm

      From a Costitutional standpoint, it matters not what his religious beliefs are. The final phrase of Article VI states, “…no religious test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States”.

      Report Post »  
    • msconstrue
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:37pm

      @thetruth……your reply/link was removed from my post(?)….we went through this religious s.h.i.t.e with kennedy. are’t there really more important things to worry about?

      Report Post »  
    • THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:47pm

      @all for freedom

      From a constitutional point obama’s radical and disturbing cult ( black liberation theology) was ok to. And where has his beliefs led our Country to? Your not going to convince anyone that sombody that holds the dangerous and deveptive beliefs that romney does will not be EVEN MORE damaging to this Country.

      Report Post » THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE  
    • WakingSheep
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:48pm

      Are you sure he’s even mormon?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9njHHyRI7g

      Report Post »  
    • THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:52pm

      @ms
      talk to the blaze about links being removed, I don’t have the ability to do that, As far as their being more important things to talk about, I can think of none more important than the next president who will have the authority to completely destroy us or dig us out of this progressive mess.

      Report Post » THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE  
    • brother_ed
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:54pm

      @TRUTH

      I am impressed by your lack of knowledge about the faith which Mitt adheres to.

      I am also impressed by the way you calmly and civilly present your point – over and over and over again. Not many people can make a broken record sound new and fresh.

      Keep up the good work.

      Report Post » brother_ed  
    • lel2007
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 11:26pm

      Your asinine rant about Romney being a Mormon is equivalent to what idiots like you said about Catholic John F. Kennedy.

      Report Post » lel2007  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:40am

      ———–

      What baffles me the most about evangelicals not supporting Paul is that besides Perry (who will be out soon), Paul is the only Evangelical Christian in the race. There are two Mormons and two Catholics (and very slimy ones at that), and evangelical Christians are supporting them?!?!

      I think it should be pointed out that Paul is the only evangelical in the running. Also, most Christians are not aware of the fact that Ron Paul will be, in his own words, the most pro-life President in history. It’s also important to point out that by cutting all foreign aid, Paul will be helping Israel, since we currently give more money to Israel’s enemies than we give to Israel. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wnj-5z9NJoY

      ——————–

      Report Post »  
  • msconstrue
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:20pm

    let this be news WHEN we have a republican nomination….until then,can someone please cover the bloody news!…there is an awful lot of other stuff going in in the world. how about the price of oil?…the mess cookin’g up in the middle east?…the feds quanitative easing, PART 3!!!…thats what we need to be paying attention to now!!

    Report Post »  
    • Bri 3D
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 10:59pm

      If you don’t pay attention in the primaries, all of those problems you just mentioned will continue.

      You can’t let the banking cartel put their guys in charge and then complain about the problems they cause, you have to stop them from getting the nominations in the first place.

      Report Post »  
  • UnPlugged Ed
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:20pm

    Sorry, I will NEVER vote for Jugghead Jones… i mean Ron Paul. What a dick

    Report Post » UnPlugged Ed  
    • Br@dley
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:47pm

      a mature and enlightened perspective.
      that was of course, satire (i’m sure lost on you).

      Report Post » Br@dley  
    • UnPlugged Ed
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:08pm

      I love it when a Paulnut cries

      Report Post » UnPlugged Ed  
    • Br@dley
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:20pm

      crying? you were scolded like a child, yet i am crying.

      sure, why not.

      Report Post » Br@dley  
    • Bri 3D
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 11:03pm

      You must make a living at the expense of the tax payers I presume.
      Why else would anyone support the status quo?

      Report Post »  
  • Redmanblackdog
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:20pm

    Did all 17 of the New Hampshire eletorates vote yet?

    Report Post »  
  • UnPlugged Ed
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:19pm

    I will never…ever….EVER… vote for ANYONE i don’t believe in. i DON’T believe in Romney, I think he is a typical Republican Gold Old Boy and I would rather this country hit rock bottom with Obama at the helm…..let it go…i will NOT vote for someone who is NOT committed to fixing us…BYE BYE!

    Report Post » UnPlugged Ed  
    • SamIamTwo
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:28pm

      So if he is the one to run against the dictator, you’ll not vote against Obama? You are a sad sack if you do not vote against Obama…

      The Tea Party is starting to back Romney…You think they did so without discussing issues with the man?

      Get your head on straight and vote against Obama or you will be one of many who may cause Obama to have another TURN at the WHEEL. And it is going to be a serious hard left turn that will eat your wallet and life style.

      Report Post » SamIamTwo  
    • eyestoseeearstohear
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:30pm

      @ UNPLUGGED ED

      Know how ya’ feel – BUT – I’d rather you NOT vote at all, than vote
      FOR OBAMA.

      And, you’re right about the “Good Old Party” Reps….
      Hang in there Brother – we live to FIGHT ANOTHER DAY!
      It AIN‘T over til it’s over.

      PLEASE DON’T GIVE UP!

      Report Post »  
    • WakingSheep
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:40pm

      Ron Paul all the way!

      Report Post »  
    • unsafe
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:42pm

      Voting for Rob boy is like voting forthe O boy

      Report Post »  
    • UnPlugged Ed
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:52pm

      a LONG time ago i firmly believed that there is NO FREEKIN WAY that this countries “first black President” goes down after one term. “They” will never EVER let that happen. Even if he DID lose, the blacks would set the country on fire!. So i felt all along that Obama would be have a 2nd term anyway. This country has had a love affair with black people for many years now, they are made of Teflon right now thanks to women and children. Obama WILL have a 2nd term. No Republican politician will give up his sweet job for the sake of his morals…even if he/she had any. He was put in for a REASON! he stays….for a REASON!

      Report Post » UnPlugged Ed  
    • the_ancient
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:53pm

      @SamIamTwo,

      You, and people like you are what is wrong with the political system in the country, Instead of voting for the RIGHT PEOPLE, you vote “against” someone, or vote for “who you think will win”

      Most of my Voting Life I have voted Libertarian/Independent for President, because I felt that candidate was the RIGHT person for the job, my vote is not “wasted” because I did the correct and honourable thing, people that vote “Against” someone or cast a vote for someone they do not like because they think they will win and you have to vote for the winner are doing a disservice to themselves and IMO are traitors to the republic

      Report Post » the_ancient  
    • Atomic
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:13pm

      @ UnPlugged Ed

      I agree with you. I can not support Romney either. There‘s no way I’m voting for him. There are a lot of things that I do not like about obama, mostly socialized medicine that he passed. Romney passed socialized medicine long before anyone even knew who obama was. That in itself disqualifies Romney for being a conservative, can‘t comprehend how he’s even a republican…

      Supreme court judges will be up, and its down right SCARY to think that Romney will be picking them… Say what you want about G.W. Bush, but at least he picked some very good supreme court judges. He also trampled on the 2nd amendment in MA. $100/per gun/per year in MA, thanks to Romney… A Romney presidency will send conservatism back another 50 years.

      If Romney wins it, I’m going 3rd party for sure.

      Report Post » Atomic  
    • lel2007
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 11:31pm

      Bye bye. Don’t let the door hit you in the @ss on your way out.

      Report Post » lel2007  
    • nationalcalvin
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 11:35pm

      @unplugged

      I’m with you, I will go and vote for some local elections, but I will throw my vote away to a third party for President.

      Report Post »  
    • pamela kay
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 12:41am

      UNPLUGGED ED, Even if it means Obama will win? The first thing that came to my mind was, CRAP. When I think Paul might forge ahead, I think Double CRAP. However I force myself to look at it the same way that I look at praying for my enemies, I don’t really want to, but I know its the right thing to do. So, I will vote for whoever gets it regardless so the vote that I cast will count for something rather than a second term for Obama. We can not as a country afford 4 more years with a progressive in the White House. Look for Hillary in the mix, we haven’t seen the last of her yet. P)lease reconsider and help us remove Obama.

      Report Post » pamela kay  
  • Vechorik
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:17pm

    Wiki definition of Tea Party
    The Tea Party movement is an American populist political movement that is generally recognized as conservative and libertarian,and has sponsored protests and supported political candidates since 2009. It endorses reduced government spending, opposition to taxation in varying degrees, reduction of the national debt and federal budget deficit, and adherence to an originalist interpretation of the United States Constitution.

    Report Post »  
    • Ming The Merciless
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:38pm

      Yes that’s all well and good (definition-wise) but the Tea Party was co-opted a few years back. In fact during Glenn’s absence in late December – a fill-in host had a lady guest on the show. This lady guest (I can’t remember her name) claims she started the Tea Party movement in 2009! Actually the Tea Party movement was built by Ron Paul type supporters in 2007. You can view that on youtube with the news stories of the time period showing that. I find it a strange and interesting re-write of history that happened under Glenn’s name (The Glann Beck show) – I wonder if he’ll take responsibility for that error or will he spin it?

      Ron Paul 2012!

      Report Post » Ming The Merciless  
    • Ming The Merciless
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:42pm

      I guess I should add that the lady guest who claimed she started the Tea Party movement talked about her favorite Tea Party candidates like Michelle Bachmann and Ricky Sanitorium. Those turds aren’t Tea people – they are big govt people who are into big military spending/foreign interventionism and the like.

      And yes, let’s all say it together….. (one) (two) (three).. NEO-CONS!

      Ron Paul 2012!

      Report Post » Ming The Merciless  
  • P8riot
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:17pm

    Romney 2012 here we come!

    Report Post » P8riot  
    • THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:25pm

      Don’t be so haughty..The TRUTH is coming out.

      Report Post » THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE  
    • Tower7_TRUTH
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:30pm

      It is hard to imagine that well-educated Mormon men of such political stature like former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, Utah Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah or Senator Harry Reid of Nevada could bring their thumbs to their throats and swear a blood oath that they will ‘suffer’ their throats slit from ear to ear should they not “sacrifice all that [they] possess, even [their] own lives if necessary, in sustaining and defending the Kingdom of God, as defined by the Mormon prophet.

      These LDS oaths are taken directly from the rituals of Blue Lodge Masonry, the source of much of the LDS Temple rituals. It is no wonder, since the first 5 presidents and prophets of the LDS church were Masons.

      These high level Temple Mormons clearly know that this Mormon “Kingdom of God” is, in reality, a Mormon one-world government, a theocracy, soon coming to America, that will be run by the strong arm of the Mormon Brethren, headed up by the only true prophet of God on earth. However, it is clear that they did swear such an oath. http://www.saintsalive.com/resourcelibrary/mormonism/the-mormon-plan-for-america-and-the-rise-of-mitt-romney

      Report Post » Tower7_TRUTH  
    • martinez012577
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 11:49pm

      Oh boy Tower. You are interrupting p8riots good deeds that will get him exalted. Granted a good deed done for selfish reasons(to gain the highest level of Heaven) is not worth anything but the truth God of the Bible knows the heart.

      Sadly our Mormon friends have fallen in one of Satan’s many traps. The idea that a man can become like God. It sounds almost silly to even think about, but the Mormons believe it. Anyone electing a person that thinks they have a shot at being a god needs to have their head looked at for brain injuries.

      Report Post » martinez012577  
  • Vechorik
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:16pm

    Lobby donations to candidates:
    Ron Paul, the least
    Romney, the most

    https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/388538_272869062772956_242807579112438_729446_630918877_n.jpg

    Report Post »  
  • UnPlugged Ed
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:16pm

    Joe Trippi??????? HAHAHA Freekin Lose!

    FNC, the reason you lost me- Geraldo, Beckel and Trippi (among other people)

    Report Post » UnPlugged Ed  
  • Vechorik
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:16pm

    Poll: Romney, Paul Tie Obama

    By Steven Shepard
    Updated: January 9, 2012 | 7:02 p.m.
    January 9, 2012 | 6:50 p.m.

    http://www.nationaljournal.com/2012-presidential-campaign/poll-romney-paul-tie-obama-20120109
    ——————–
    Lobby donations to candidates:
    Ron Paul, the least
    Romney, the most

    https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/388538_272869062772956_242807579112438_729446_630918877_n.jpg

    Report Post »  
  • lobaker
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:15pm

    Wake up america!!!!!
    Ron paul 2012.
    Newt gingrich just said all ron paul supporters only support paul because they are the “legalize drugs crowd”
    this is how out of touch these people are with the economy and our national debt. I support ron paul for his foreign, policy, austrian economic, right to work, sound money beliefs, oh yeah he is the only candidate who votes the constitution!!!!!!

    Report Post »  
    • number9
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:30pm

      OMG. You mean drugs aren’t already legal? Could have fooled me. After all, my 6 year old daughter is pretty damn sure she has erectile dsyfunction. Heck, as a mom, I’m pretty sure I have it too. In fact, thanks to those lovely big pharma commercials, I now have every known condition to man (or woman.) Now I have to sue somebody, anybody- because that’s what the commercial says I should do. So, if Ron Paul want’s to legalize drugs, I say go for it. What do we have to lose that we haven’t already lost?

      Report Post » number9  
    • ashestoashes
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:53pm

      Newt Gingrich
      http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2818630/posts

      Report Post »  
    • ModerationIsBest
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:42pm

      Newt is an idiot.

      I’m a Ron Paul supporter and have never smoked weed or done any hard drugs.

      Report Post »  
  • Vechorik
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:15pm

    What baffles me the most about evangelicals not supporting Paul is that besides Perry (who will be out soon), Paul is the only Evangelical Christian in the race. There are two Mormons and two Catholics (and very slimy ones at that), and evangelical Christians are supporting them?!?!

    I think it should be pointed out that Paul is the only evangelical in the running. Also, most Christians are not aware of the fact that Ron Paul will be, in his own words, the most pro-life President in history. It’s also important to point out that by cutting all foreign aid, Paul will be helping Israel, since we currently give more money to Israel’s enemies than we give to Israel. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wnj-5z9NJoY

    Report Post »  
    • Clara88
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:03pm

      Gov Rick Perry will win South Carolina. He is loved in the south :)

      Report Post » Clara88  
    • circleDwagons
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:13pm

      @ Vechorick, very good question. my wife states she will not vote for either romney or paul. she likes perry and santorum. of course she also thinks these primaries are a waste of time.

      Report Post » circleDwagons  
    • nationalcalvin
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 11:51pm

      @vech

      How is he going to be the most pro life president in history? He believes there is a right to privacy in the Constitution. So does that mean that he thinks Roe v Wade was consititutional? That interpertation of the Constitution is what gave us Roe v Wade to begin with.

      Report Post »  
    • bigspike
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 5:56am

      it‘s also important to note that ’ronpaul’ is a conspiracy theory loving NUTJOB who, if nominated by the GOP, woyuld hand 0baMao a 50-state win on the order of a 15-20 percent margin of victory-his support in a mile deep and an inch wide

      Report Post » bigspike  
  • West Coast Patriot
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:15pm

    We have to consider the possibility of voter fraud with the backing Romney has. Go to http://www.blackboxvoting.org/ and learn how you can do your part to fight voter fraud.

    Report Post » West Coast Patriot  
  • Vechorik
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:14pm

    Wiki definition of Tea Party (I agree) The Tea Party movement (TPM) is an American populist political movement that is generally recognized as conservative and libertarian,and has sponsored protests and supported political candidates since 2009. It endorses reduced government spending, opposition to taxation in varying degrees, reduction of the national debt and federal budget deficit, and adherence to an originalist interpretation of the United States Constitution. (adherence to the Constitution is the part I like best)

    Report Post »  
    • THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:30pm

      I believe the tea party was somewhat corrupted after their was some organization to it, the so called leaders of these groups were wined and dined by the establishment. They soon got drunk on arrogance and the fact that they were now “ important”. Their heads swelled up as the establishment patted them on the back and told them what good little people they were.

      Report Post » THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE  
    • Ming The Merciless
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:03pm

      It was started in 2007 by Ron Paul types – see here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bNiDx7qTjA

      Report Post » Ming The Merciless  
    • MCDAVE
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 11:53pm

      ever been to a tea party meeting?…Membership consists of ordinary hard working American citizens;Who feel betrayed by our current political system…We want a return to constitutional government in a republic..The progressives are trying to destroy us with lies..All conservatives should join the Tea party.

      Report Post »  
    • nationalcalvin
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 12:16am

      @Vech

      So you love the Constitution? Why do you support a candidate that perverts the Constitution in order to support his own agenda?

      He said that States have the right to force you to buy something. Wrong.

      He believes people who are not American citizens have protections that American citizens have under the Constitution. Wrong.

      He said that a State could not ban contraceptives because of the Commerce Clause. Wrong.

      He said that there was a right to privacy in the Constitution. Wrong.

      I wonder if he believes viewing child porn is protected free speech? I know some Libertarians do.

      I love the Constitution as well, I just don’t know that I love Ron Pauls version of the Constitution.

      Report Post »  
  • conservativeblackman
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:09pm

    Media once again trying to shape opinion. It’s to early to say who will win or who will lose.

    Report Post » conservativeblackman  
  • Small World
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:08pm

    Do we really need 24/7 coverage of this?

    Report Post »  
  • Canyouhearus
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:06pm

    No one to vote for since Michelle dropped out! Whole thing is already getting old!

    Report Post »  
  • WAKEUPUSA2012
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:04pm

    I agree.

    Ron Paul 2012

    Report Post » WAKEUPUSA2012  
  • This_Individual
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:03pm

    Paul will do better out here on the best coast!

    Report Post »  
  • AnAppealToGod
    Posted on January 10, 2012 at 7:58pm

    sorry but who wins in NH doesn’t mean ANYTHING

    Report Post » AnAppealToGod  
    • number9
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:02pm

      Ditto that. After all, you‘d think there’s some 57 other state’s yet to vote!

      Report Post » number9  
    • West Coast Patriot
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:05pm

      But the establishment media Fox is making a big deal on their chosen progressive, Mitt. When it looked like Paul might win Iowa, Fox and all the other media said that Iowa did not matter, but when Mitt won it did matter for their progressive. Shame on the media, shame on the people who have not woke up yet.

      Report Post » West Coast Patriot  
    • ScreaminEagle
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:04pm

      And by the time it’s your turn to vote who do you think will be left?

      Report Post » ScreaminEagle  
    • ModerationIsBest
      Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:44pm

      @WEST COAST PATRIOT

      Uh, Im a paul supporter but Juan Williams and Joe Trippi both said that while Romney one, he’s not coming out of new hampshire with much steam and that he should have won by more.

      Report Post »  
    • West Coast Patriot
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 3:56pm

      Moderation, that is true and I am expecting Paul to do better in S.C. I just get angry at the media for downplaying Paul when in fact he is doing quite well.

      Report Post » West Coast Patriot  
1 2 3 ... 8

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love