‘Drink F***ing Water!’: Blaze Investigates NYC Big Drink Ban (And Guess How Many Calories We Consumed?)
- Posted on June 13, 2012 at 8:55am by
Tiffany Gabbay
- Print »
- Email »
The Blaze’s Benny Johnson Contributed to this report
By now most have heard about New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s war against what he considers unhealthy eating — especially his most recent plan to outlaw sugary beverages in excess of 16 ounces from being sold at food establishments across the Big Apple. After previously enacting another measure which prohibits food donations made to soup kitchens and homeless shelters on the basis of its perceived sodium content, Bloomberg is perhaps proving once again, his affinity for the Nanny State.
(Related: NYC Health Board Suggests Regulations On Other High-Calorie Foods Including Popcorn and Dairy Drinks)
If passed, the ban would apply to delis, restaurants, fast food establishments, ballpark kiosks, 7-11s, and even the beverage giant Starbucks, among others. While most argue the move is out of touch with the idea of personal freedom and responsibility, others think that “forcing” people to make better eating and drinking choices is a positive. But if that is the case, what would be next? If large sodas are deemed a menace enough to society that they need to be outlawed, then, by that same logic, wouldn’t ice cream Sundays, extra-large pizzas, buffalo wings, and 40-ounce bottles of beer be verboten as well?
I took to the streets of Manhattan to find out how everyday consumers feel about this limitation on their personal choices — and even the “Naked Cowboy” weighed in.





















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (146)
LeeR47
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 11:17amTiffany, I loved this video! I hope The Blaze does more of this–very fun and entertaining. Much better than all the depressing cannibal stuff that’s been in the news recently. Great job!
Report Post »SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 11:39amI hear faces are the next thing to be ban from consumption in New York…Crazy nuts…
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 3:25pmPeople better think twice before telling someone to “bite me”
Report Post »bitemebiden
Posted on June 14, 2012 at 7:52amI don’t need the government telling me how much I can eat, or what I can eat… they can keep with the operations of running our country. Not the operations of how I live my life!
Report Post »@therightsofbilly – can’t help it… it’s my screen name!
KusoJiJi
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 11:17amwhy stop at soda, why not go after Pastrami sandwiches?
Report Post »SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 11:38amyou know if we ban all foods but vitamins, only allowed water (not flavored), used no technology, excommunicated energy, and made everyone equal we would have the perfect utopia, no? Si se pueda……
Report Post »SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 12:24pmI for one am tired of this administrations intolerant, sodaphobic, bigoted discrimination against sodas merely based on their size. Of course everyone knows this is in no way a fault of theirs and therefore a soda’s sense of self worth and esteem should be reinforced and encouraged, not made to feel like an outcast unworthy of common protection under the law. Perhaps, they should even be given preferential treatment under anti-hate laws. And what are we gonna due when there is mass exodus of oversized sodas into surrounding cities? How will those communities be effected? I say New york should apply the stand your ground laws to the institutional discrimination abounding against large soft drinks.
Report Post »Idontdisagree
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 11:09amHa ha the one guy said we should ban alcohol too. Tried that, failed miserably. I think I might start a soda pop mafia.
Gary Johnson 2012.
Report Post »KeystoneState
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 11:19amF— Bloomberg!
Report Post »Kathleen
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 1:40pmDoesn’t Bloomberg buy fur coats for his wife? Isn’t that bad for animals?
Report Post »jbrock09
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 11:07amNO Iz gud, Comrad Doomberg is fixing bigg problrm with Capitalist greedy swine, always drinking too much eating too much.Comrad Marx wud be proud of Commissar Doomberg. Soon all foodstuffs will be rationed in new yourk and sold from back of Doomberg Party Vans Iz Gud for Party.
Report Post »vorpal
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:54amwhen the gov takes away the things that people want it just allows a black market to grow.
Report Post »Free market – people will find a way to get the things they want – so a smart gov will not inhibit the citizens because when they do they get a black market and then the gov doesn’t have the ability to tax that commodity – epic fail.
SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 11:35amSo if we don’t inhibit black markets would that take care of the problem?
Report Post »perry1980
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:40amWake Up America
Your Freedoms are being destroyed 1 by 1 and will be until you finally speak up.
Its time to Speak up in November
Report Post »SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:47amIllegal immigrant meet illegal soda…..Viva la cola……Si se pueda librar la cola
Report Post »lisa2994
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:28amWe all have a personal responsibility and know what to eat and drink to not become overweight. But like I said that should be everyone’s personal choice not the government dictating what to eat and drink! Sometimes I want to eat a huge peice of chocolate cake and send a picture to this administration with a big chocolate smile on my face! LOL But I try to take care of myself but yes I indulge!!!
Report Post »SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:37amlegalize marijuana but outlaw big soft drinks….makes perfect sense to me….Gotta love Zoo York….
Report Post »Conservative New Yorker
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:44amSay it girl! ITA with you. I workout 5 times a week and eat cleanly (very little to no sugar, healthy fats, lean protein, complex carbs). And there are times that I want a yummy piece of chocolate cake or pie and in my world, that’s OK in moderation.
As you said- it comes down to taking personal responsibility for your life and not expecting the government to legislate your behavior.
And IMO, Bloomberg is not so interested in others, well-being and health but rather expanding his power over said people. This guy has a Napoleonic complex.
Report Post »SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:52amI’m pretty sure New york outlawed Napolean but you might want to check up on that….
Report Post »jackact
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:16amDoes anyone realize that this schmucks 3rd term is unconstitutional?
Report Post »Focus.
SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:26amBenevolent politicians like Bloomberg should not be derided because of their wisdom and concern for each individual. If we all took the same interest in the lives and welfare of others America would be a healthier and much easier place to rule.
Report Post »SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:31amEverything a statist does is always for the “benefit” of those they mean to rule…The more things change the more they stay the same…right Comrade? If these people take any more care of me I just might not survive….
Report Post »thenizzutz
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:37amI wasn’t aware the Constitution contained a provision regarding the number of terms the mayor of NYC may serve. Thanks, professor.
Report Post »Leader1776
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:51am@thenizzutz
Report Post »It is the in NYC that there is a Mayoral term limit of two terms. Doomberg only received approval from city council to run for a third term, which he did. Technically he needed approval of the citizens. Don’t knot if they have a city constitution, but it is a law.
MaineLibertarian
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:11amWhat a messed up way of thinking. We live in a free country, people should be able to eat and drink whatever they want. This will do nothing to fight obesity. If people want large drinks, they will just get two of the smaller sizes.
Report Post »SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:27amWe aren’t a free country !!!!! We haven’t been for a good while.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:10amOne more incremental step for the leftists who want absolute control and power over all aspects of our lives.
Report Post »FoxholeAtheist
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:36amNo, they just want to not have to sit next to a big fat Glenn Beck fan when they’re in a movie theater or an airplane. They don‘t want to have to wait to take their kids on the Small World ride at Disneyland because they’re reinforcing the boats to hold more weight.
Report Post »SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:44amWould Michael Moore, Joy Behar, Ed Schultz, or Bob Beckel be in any of those places FOX?
Report Post »Citizen
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:44amFoxhole are you not able to handle a 20 oz drink and need someone to tell you not to drink it ?
Report Post »Conservative New Yorker
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:47am@ F/A- I will pray for you because that is what Christians do. And don’t point out nut-cases like Westboro- they aren’t Christians in any sense of the word.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 3:39pmWow, the atheist is a “fatist”……..who knew?
Report Post »BOGOTSTOGO
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:08amI am going nuts! Have you ever noticed that the fattest people at McDonalds are drinking diet soda. I think the artificial sweetener is 10 times the problem sugar is! This is State sponsored poisoning
Report Post »booger71
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:13amWhich state is sponsoring artificial sweeteners?. I might just be that big mac and large fries putting the weight on them.
Report Post »RamonPreston
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:21amDiet soda is FAR worse than regular soda. If you regularly drink aspartame you will have health problems before you are 40. There are 92 known side affects. And they put aspartame in everything. The FDA pushed a poisonus product on us.
http://aspartame.mercola.com/
Report Post »http://www.sweetpoison.com/aspartame-side-effects.html
SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:33amAnyone for diet politicians?
Report Post »authorchriskeys
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:07amIts time to ban Michael Bloomberg and the $%#@^& that side with him. It‘s absolutely against the Constitution to tell some they can’t drink more than 16 ounces of whatever at a time. The logic would dictate they could then tell you that you can’t eat fried foods, pizza or fast food. Does Bloomberg own any fast food restuarants? If he does I bet he doesn’t ban any food it serves. This is not only Fasism at it’s worse but can lead now where but to the Nanny state taking over. Will Bloomberg try to regulate the size glasses people have in their homes so they don’t consume too much to fast there as well. What’s to stop someone from simply buying ten 16 oz Cokes? Will Bloomberg try reguiring the people of New York to buy a license to buy soda and set a limit as to how many you can buy? Is he going to hire new police- create The Beverage Authority- and have an officer stationed at every store and restaurant in the city? The guy is an #%^^# and needs to be banned from doing business or living in this country. How stupid are New Yorkers to have voted this Jerk into office as Mayor?
Report Post »SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:42amYou might want to lay off the caffiene a bit…..
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:07amIndividual choice, not government mandates.
Report Post »SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:34amCan we make that a government mandate?
Report Post »RamonPreston
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 9:59amDo you want us to drink the flouridated water that “medicates” us? I run my water through a charcoal filter before I drink it.
Report Post »http://www.nofluoride.com/
RJJinGadsden
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:03amSame here. Keep two of the filtered pitchers in the fridge at all times.
Report Post »booger71
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:04amIt looks like from your pic, you might need some fluoride, You might have had some teeth left.
Report Post »RamonPreston
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:26amI picked this avatar from a selection of several. Even had one with a man wearing a diaper. Google: ugliest man This was a reasonable choice. I don’t put my real picture on the internet. I have put on many posts about the CIA using face-recognition software and gathering information from the internet. Facebook is #1 on my list.
Report Post »FoxholeAtheist
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:40amSo, are you planning on blowing up a women’s clinic or something? Is that why you fear the CIA? I‘m sure you’ve stocked up on tin foil.
Report Post »RamonPreston
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:40amWhy don’t you use “Diaper boy” or “Ugly baby”? I’m sure they are available.
http://www.grimmemennesker.dk/cat1.htm?page=14
(I used to use a picture of “Lurch” but my granddaughter asked me to change it. She said it scared her.)
Report Post »Citizen
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 9:58amLol
So new yorkers are too stupid to decide if they can handle a 20 oz drink.
Now if you cant handle a 20 oz soda you sure cant handle the responsability of voting, since that city is too stupid to handle large drinks they sure cant handle the ability to vote and that should be stripped from them.
You new york clowns let this happen in your city ? lol you deserve it
The only thing wrong is you cant even handle 16 oz size it should have been a sippy cup.
Think about what bloomber is saying there are people in new york who fought in wars and saved peoples lives and performed life saving operations yet they cant have a 20 oz coke cause bloomber has decided they are too stupid to handle that responsability. somehow these fools who cant handle a 20 oz are supposed to be able to informed enough to vote for a pres ?
So just sit there and take it new york you deserve it for rolling over . Anyone who favors this admits they are too stupid to handle a basic fundemental of life – drinking fluid.
Report Post »TWO BITS
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 9:57amEat, drink, and be merry for tomorrow the diet panels will only exempt union members and fat-headed politicians at the trough.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:06amYes . this is nothing but controlling us “little people” .. you know what they used to call CITIZENS and VOTERS … time to TAKE BACK AMERICA!
Report Post »jcldwl
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 9:52amHey do you hear that? Listen….oops sorry I thought it was the ice cream truck. I forgot those were outlawed. Hey want a piece of gum? Oh wait…no nutritional value…outlawed. Hey…it’s Miller time…oops again…outlawed (I know they already tried that but then again how many times has communism been tried and failed but here we go again with that.) Soon very soon we will all be trapped in automated small cities, Unable to leave, unable to eat what we want, unable to do anything that might make us feel human and free. This is all nuts man people of New York City please listen to my plea….Flee, leave now before it is to late…I doubt it is very long before the fences go up and you won‘t be able to leave that cess pool of a city because they won’t be able to afford you leaving.
Report Post »Brittany-Imbriaarts
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 9:52amwow the guy must not have studied prohibition period say they should ban alcohol
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:01amAnother liberal version of Carrie Nation
Report Post »booger71
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:12amHe is also not thin
Report Post »boxturtle
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 9:49amI keep thinking that there is nothing greasier that a good “Taco” and I have heard not a the first moan about them. Is it a politically correct and non-offensive food?
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:02amNothing better than a box of tacos!
Report Post »T-2
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 9:23amthey should ban the progressive cool-aid that everyone is drinking.
Report Post »RLTW
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:38amYou’re right about that
This is a law and progressive foothold about volume consumption and if anyone thinks it will stop here they’re delusional.
Once established, and people are nudged in the desired direction the next volume consumption law will be attached to this one.
Report Post »RLTW
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 9:23amWhen they banned soda I said nothing I didn’t drink it, when they banned sugary coffee I said nothing I didn’t drink it… but when they came for my Jack Daniels all drinks except Brondo were gone and it was too late.
Report Post »(see Idiocracy)
THX-1138
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 9:39amIt has electrolytes!
Report Post »shadownmss
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:00amIt’s what plants crave.
Report Post »Docrow
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:09amThey can have my coffee cup when they pry it from my cold dead hand. ;-)
Report Post »50Caliber
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 9:17am……..“and then they came for me”
Report Post »DIVINEPROVIDENCE1776
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 9:12amFunny and informative video Tiffany!
Report Post »hi
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 9:55amI like her! She is funny.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 9:06amWhen politicians think up a law that would ban progressives from holding public office I could support that with enthusiasm.
Report Post »SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:50amThere you go again assuming politicians think….geezzzz
Report Post »PRESENTSOFMIND
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 9:03amFood Nazis. Plain & simple.
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:10amYeah, they are the coming to fruition of Seinfeld’s Soup Nazis.
Report Post »Citizen
Posted on June 13, 2012 at 10:13amNot food nazis
Just stupid people. These new york idiots chose this guy and support him.
They realize they are libs and are much to stupid to handle a 20 oz drink, its almost a good thing. Now if they also realized as libs they are too stupid to vote and took that away from themselves it would be even better.
What I realize most now after this is how pathetic new york is to just sit there and take it – I love how bloomberg thinks a soldier who fought in wars cant handle a 20 oz drink – an your city full of morons agrees, and even the ones who dont agree just roll over and take it. You deserve it new york.
Report Post »