World

Egyptian Protesters Conflicted Over United States’ Role

CAIRO (AP/The Blaze) — One of the insults flung at President Hosni Mubarak by Egyptian protesters seeking his ouster: “Mubarak, you coward! You American collaborator!”

Hostility toward the United States is widespread among the crowds in Cairo’s streets, who feel Washington’s alliance with Egypt — along with billions of dollars in military aid over the years — has helped Mubarak’s authoritarian regime keep its grip on power for nearly 30 years.

A CNN interview with protesters brought to you Sunday by The Blaze demonstrated how anti-Mubarak protests have turned into anti-U.S. and anti-Israel rallies:

But there’s also a yearning for U.S. support.

Among the tens of thousands of Egyptians who have gathered in Cairo’s main square over the past week, there’s a widespread belief that the administration of President Barack Obama could be a key factor in helping to push Mubarak out. So behind the angry chants, there are hopes for solidarity.

“America has to support us — not the oppressors of the people,” said protester Abdel-Salam Hassan, a 51-year-old unemployed man.

“The Americans believe in democracy. Now they have to show us,” said Hassan, who stood in Cairo’s downtown Tahrir, or Liberation, Square, a focal point of protests against economic hardship, government corruption, police brutality and political restrictions.

Washington has urged Mubarak to allow an orderly transition to democracy, giving a strong impression that it believes he will have to go. But it has not called outright for him to step down, and it has seemed wary of chaos and a power vacuum if he leaves. Obama administration officials say Washington is pressing Mubarak to institute a set of key reforms, including a lifting of emergency laws in place since 1981 and the holding of credible presidential elections in September, preferably without the 82-year-old leader as a candidate.

The demonstrators have a multilayered perception of America, a reflection of the complicated feelings widespread among the Egyptian public, where many often express respect for freedoms they see in the United States but anger at what they see as domineering policies in the Middle East.

Egyptian police pummeled protesters with tear gas, rubber bullets and in some cases, live fire, in the early demonstrations that erupted a week ago, many of which turned deadly. But demonstrators said they believed the police response would have been even more violent were it not for strongly worded calls of restraint by Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

They noted with bitterness, however, that some of the weaponry used against them appeared to be U.S.-made.

“Look at this!” one man shouted in a makeshift emergency room in a mosque near Tahrir Square on Saturday, as doctors treated bleeding demonstrators and other volunteers removed the bodies of slain protesters. He held up tear gas canisters emblazoned with “Made in the USA.”

Another man shook a fistful of bullet casings at reporters. “America! This is America!” he shouted.

A military helicopter that swooped over Tahrir Square, as well as warplanes that roared across Cairo’s skies on Sunday, highlighted the conundrum once again. Protesters shook fists at the two low-flying planes and declared that they were obtained with U.S. military aid.

The United States gives some $1.3 billion in military aid to Egypt every year, along with $200 million in economic aid. But the aid is viewed by many Egyptians with mixed feelings, seeing it as a tool to keep their country’s government subservient to American foreign policy — for example by supporting the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 and by maintaining ties with Israel.

The United States has often called for reform and an end to abuse in Egypt — and for a period in the mid 2000s it hiked up the pressure, seeking to make Egypt a showcase for a policy of greater democracy in the Middle East. But the pressure eased. Many in Egypt believe Washington shelved the demands to ensure Mubarak’s secular government as a close ally in efforts to contain Islamic extremism and deal with regional issues.

To ensure that stability, they say a succession of U.S. administrations has tolerated Mubarak’s tightening grip on power, including elections believed to have been rigged and indications that he may have been grooming his son, Gamal, to succeed him.

“America is worried about instability in Egypt, so they’ll try find a new leader they like and anoint him to work for their interests,” said Muslim preacher Ahmad Abdullah, 40, who was sleeping in Tahrir Square.

“They will keep stepping on our heads,” he said.

The U.S. is in a further bind, said political activist and analyst Mohamed el-Dahshan.

Egyptians have long viewed any foreign inference in their affairs with deep resentment — even if it matches their own goals, el-Dahshan said. He noted that U.S. pressure helped secure the release of several jailed human rights activists over the past few years, though at the same time the pressure tarred them among some Egyptians as American stooges.

The U.S. has refrained from outwardly supporting Mohamed ElBaradei, an opposition leader and Nobel Prize laureate whose frequent travel in the West has tainted him with suspicion among some Egyptians.

“People are aware the current regime can’t survive without the support of the Americans,” el-Dahshan said. “But they are hoping that (the United States) will allow Mubarak to be toppled, and then stand aside.”

Comments (12)

  • Nick Jumangit
    Posted on February 1, 2011 at 7:06pm

    The protesters are now showing their colors: anti US – Israel slogans are now popping-up all over! I can see another Iran in the offing and another Democratic President is on watch – a “Jimmy Carter Moment”!!

    Report Post »  
  • ohiojack
    Posted on February 1, 2011 at 4:10pm

    Here is a way that we can save the American taxpayer over 1 Billion dollars, let the Egyptian protesters foot their counties bills. How many jobs have these Islamic extremism created????

    Report Post »  
  • dizzyinthedark
    Posted on February 1, 2011 at 2:01pm

    Here‘s what’s bothering me about about our involvement over there. The article states the people view our involvement with deep resentment. Also on one hand they understand the current regime can’t survive without our support, but in the same breathe they hope ‘we allow’ Mubarak to be toppled. They think WE have ultimate power over whether Mubarak stays in power or not. Funny, I thought THEY, THE PEOPLE had the power over there as to who was in charge and what they wanted for a leader? I’m confused? Someone explain please?

    Report Post » dizzyinthedark  
  • Bill Wallace
    Posted on February 1, 2011 at 1:21pm

    This really bothers me.

    America is the greatest nation for giving aid and support to people. And the result? We are constantly blamed.

    Bitch if we help.
    Bitch if we don’t.

    A no-win situation.

    How about another period of America where we tell the world to deal with their own issues, and instead of trying to play savior for the world, we first clean up our own yard. Get rid of the destructive elements, lock down the borders, eliminate the social injustices, feed the hungry, get jobs for the poor, kick out those who refuse to work and leech off society. Then, once we have cleaned up our own yard, we can then voice an opinion on others, and help others.

    Report Post »  
  • entropy
    Posted on February 1, 2011 at 8:58am

    I guess they think that Obama is King Tut reincarnated. “The king will save us!”

    Report Post »  
  • Hollow
    Posted on February 1, 2011 at 5:31am

    I would just let Mubarak’s rule end. Let make a new government off their own and stop paying them Israel and every other nation the U.S gives money to in the Middle East.

    Report Post » Hollow  
  • hyndsyte2020
    Posted on February 1, 2011 at 3:54am

    This is a no win. Democracy will mean the downfall of our best Muslim alliy iin the region, with the likely installment of a theocratic Sharia based system over the next few years,as secular voices are drowned out by the shrill calls for more fundamentalist government from the no longer suppressed voices of radical Imams.. Most troubling will be the end of peacefully coexistence with Israel, with the possible start of a large scale conflict we could find ourselves involved in. This may be the Islamic version of the domino theory playing out in the middle east. STINKS on ICE

    Report Post »  
  • pamela kay
    Posted on February 1, 2011 at 2:24am

    Of course they are. obama is a namby pamby. I wish that there was a way to communicate with them so that we know and understand what is happening, and that we pray for their safety. The blood of these people are on the hands of the progressives. God help us all.

    Report Post » pamela kay  
  • pamela kay
    Posted on February 1, 2011 at 2:12am

    I do pray for the Egptian people. I hope that they know that we pray for them to have to live in peace and have the same freedoms that we are so blessed to have . I wish that for all people worldwide. I know that it will never happen but I still do pray for those less fortunate.

    Report Post » pamela kay  
  • USA_DisabledVet
    Posted on February 1, 2011 at 1:13am

    Egypt should receive the same amount of money in aid as Israel.

    Report Post »  
  • Gruug
    Posted on February 1, 2011 at 12:41am

    I am all for “democracy” in Eygpt over the 60 some years of dictators to which they have had. However, I am not for Eygpt going backwards in their treatment of Isreal. If democracy means no change in that arena, Eygpt should expect nothing but support from the U.S.

    Report Post »  
  • Margaret Thatcher
    Posted on February 1, 2011 at 12:37am

    Bad times.

    Report Post »  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In