Even Some Gay Activists Are ‘Creeped Out’ by Pro-Gay Marriage Video Featuring Kissing Kids (Oh, and Christians Are Slammed, Too)
- Posted on July 20, 2011 at 1:55pm by
Dave Urbanski
- Print »
- Email »
Editor’s note: An extreme content warning applies to this story. The video contains lots of profanity.
An in-your-face video supporting gay marriage in Minnesota and mocking Christians has drawn the ire of some gay-rights activists who say the clip—full of f-bombs, racy visuals, and even same-sex kissing by very young-looking actors—leaves them “creeped out.”
Editor’s note: Again — extreme content warning applies here.
Update: The group has now removed the video from YouTube. They are still featuring it on their website. The content warning applies again…you can see it be clicking here.
Kevin Farrell of the Unicorn Booty pro-gay blog writes, “It feels creepy for me as a grown-ass gay man to watch kids kiss. It feels creepy to post video of children kissing on my company’s website. I understand the point is to ruffle feathers, but if some of the top gay bloggers in the world are creeped out by your message (or method, in this case), you’re ruffling the wrong feathers.”
The clip’s final scene features two very young-looking males holding hands. The first says, “If I grew up gay…” and the second finishes the phrase saying, “…I want to get married someday”—and then they appear to kiss.
Writes Farrell:
“My partner and future-sister-in-law-in-six-states happened to be watching this video over my shoulder and we all had the same reaction when the kiss happened.
“‘AUGHH, Wha-why-what the hell?! Why did they do that?’
“A swing and a miss from where we’re sitting, FCKH8. (We still love you though.)”
The other actors in the quick-cut video—with over-the-top make-up and neon-colored clothing (some males only in T-shirts and tiny underwear)—make fun of gay-marriage opponents and Christians by satirically stating phrases on why gay marriage is wrong.
The actors portray Christians in particular as mindless followers of church laws. One girl, twirling her hair, sarcastically says that homosexuality is wrong because “the Bible tells me so.” It also displays a string of actors completing each other’s sentences, saying the Bible “tells me it’s okay to sell my daughter into slavery and to stone people that work on Sunday. So it’s great for making laws.”
The National Organization for Marriage, which says FCKH8.com “tries to propagandize young kids to become activists for gay marriage,” posted a response to the video on its blog: “We also must ask again, when will other gay groups condemn the F*K H8 campaign tactics? If they can’t condemn it, do they support this sort of thing?”
FCKH8.com is raising money for Minnesotans United for All Families, which wants to defeat a proposed statewide ban on same-sex marriage in 2012. For each “Like” on Facebook and “Tweet” on Twitter that FCKH8.com receives, it says it will donate 10 cents to MUAF, up to $10,000. It’s also raising money by selling clothes, stickers, pins, and wristbands emblazoned with slogans such as “Born This Way,” “Don’t B H8N On The Homos” and “Some Kids R Gay. That’s OK.”
(h/t The Christian Post)
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 688 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 536 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 458 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 374 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 333 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 300 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 313 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 209 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 148 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 301 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 300 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (338)
coryf076
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:13pmDon’t forget….these same left wing progressives usually fight for causes and side with Islamo-fascists…who hate homosexuality….funny world we live ain’t it? They make a real odd couple don’t they? The homosexual community always throws crap at Christians….why not muslims, who are much more vocal about their anti-homosexual feelings than any Christian groups?
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:46pmWell the Muslims did side with Hitler who was brought to power with the goal of eliminating sodomy laws in Germany.
Report Post »coryf076
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 3:02pmHitler was brought to power with the goal of eliminating Sodomy laws? That was Hitler’s goal for Germany??? I think you are missing a large group of people he actually did eliminate….you might want to look into that!
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 3:12pmThe poor Jews were just in their way, the Christians were going to be next. Sexual deviants are not good people.
http://www.defendthefamily.com/pfrc/books/pinkswastika/html/the_pinkswastika_4th_edition_-_final.htm
Report Post »Brasil2520
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 3:12pmIn 10 years the next video will be old guys with young boys kissing, and if you protest you will be called “racist” and your comment removed.
In 20 years it will be young boys with farm animals . . .
Report Post »Ella
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 3:16pmAll evil and G-dless people flock together. Theya re after all birds of a feather.
Report Post »cessna152
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 3:18pmBottom line? Anything that demonizes and slanders the truth (Which is Christ) these people will side with. Sick, sick, sick!
Report Post »MartyTr
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 3:27pmStupid or cowards, both?
Report Post »Hungry_i
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 3:32pmThe culture has almost hit bottom. Almost.
Report Post »elrond3737
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 3:42pmCulture hit bottom… Yeah it is close but I am afraid it will get worse.
Report Post »coryf076
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 4:02pmimagine teaching your children the homosexual lifestyle is not something you believe in….then your child goes to public skrewel for indoctrination and sees johnny and jimmy making out and makes a commment saying that is wrong…your child will be sent to the principal for interrogation, punishment, and possible hate crimes, and then you will be thrown in prison for teaching hate….this is where we are headed!
Report Post »turkey13
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 4:56pmThis junk like this is the only thing good about Sharia law. Instead of some queers kissing we will have to see pictures of bodys that have been stoned to death. I wonder if the queers will be lined up by the lizzies or they are segragated by sex.
Report Post »avenger
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 5:16pmIt is amazing how a minority under 3% can cause so much havoc in the country.The way to stop this shet is simply to ignore them.
Report Post »TunaBlue
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 5:34pmMarriage is not about your sexuality or the act of sex. That’s a very small part of the commitment and union of marriage. Homosexuals never wanted the right of marriage until they were given the right to civil marriage in most states. This isn’t about equal rights, it’s about being more equal than others. Here’s a very small percent of the total population, about 5 to 7 percent, but they possess a great deal of political clout.
Report Post »markThatcher
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 6:24pmOk I am gay and have been in a relationship for 25 yrs and 4 months, and at 53 I am a sit shocked by this in your face attempt to get a message across. Yes hate is awful and has been instilled in mankind since creation. Gay marriage will not disrupt the lives of any straight people and will finally confirm thta “all men are created equal”. A constitutional amendment banning gay marriage will be the ruination of America and the beliefs and tenets on which it was founded.
Report Post »dr_funk
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 8:35pm“It feels creepy to post video of children kissing on my company’s website”
Oh, you mean, you got an inkling that what you’re doing is WRONG???
Report Post »dr_funk
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 8:44pm“A constitutional amendment banning gay marriage will be the ruination of America and the beliefs and tenets on which it was founded.”
AHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Right…preserving the foundation of civilization, the family, will ruin civilization…right.
I don’t care if people were born wanting to hump walls, cars, or goats. It doesn’t matter if they were born with the compulsion, or the compulsion formed as a result of their environment. Its still wrong to have sex with walls, cars, or goats.
Report Post »JoeBtfsplk
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 9:44pmI wonder if they were paid exorbitantly or did this voluntarily?
Report Post »Rene
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 10:55pmUmmm, seriously funny, I think.
Report Post »Armed Patriot
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 6:22amDid you notice that all of these sodomites were very unusual in their dress, hair, drag queen, underwear, and every one was using vial language. These are the people we should be listening to? These are the people that we should be helping out? These are the people we should be keeping our children from.
Report Post »Mamma Bear
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:12pmThis is too much. What is with all the language and the kids kissing at the end, almost like child porn. Disgusting.
Report Post »menotyou
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:18pmAlmost? Why is this not going to the local court for child porn.
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:21pmGays are the have liberals they want everyone to tolerate and accept their beliefs while refusing to tolerate religious peoples beliefs text book liberal
Report Post »Wayner
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:22pmThe whole queer lifestyle is sickening
Report Post »SoiledDove
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:26pmChild porn???? You can’t be serious. Whenever a little boy and a little girl kiss, I often hear it described as “cute.”
Report Post »Goodgriefgeezlouise
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:28pmWhen deviant behavior becomes so commonplace it’s seen as normal, morality and ethics fade into a fog..Once a society loses it‘s foundation it’s headed for a fall..America can find it’s way back but we have been sleeping for so long, it won’t be easy..
Report Post »watchmany2k
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 3:09pmI high-hosey that we all go to ther site at 6pm EDT every day for the next month and hit reload 20 times. If we can bring down a legitimate site, we certainly can slam this one.
Report Post »fckh8.com
Sick
Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 3:22pmI really don’t understand why they feel the need to get married. I understand the contesting of wills, but that can happen even if they are married. The reason for marriage is to procreate and raise civil children. Gay people cannot procreate, but can adopt. They aren’t exactly great role models and the teasing a child gets, doesn’t help.
Report Post »Homosexuality won’t go away, but they don’t have to stick it in my face. That certainly won’t change my mind. Keep it behind doors, just like where most people keep their sex lives.
MartyTr
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 4:05pmPolygamy next, anything goes.
Report Post »Autumknight
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 4:57pm@ SoiledDove,
Report Post »I think the difference is when a little boy and girl smooth, it might be cute, but these kids are kissing in a sensual manner suggesting the act is leading to sex, therefore, child porn….
Lesbian Packing Hollow Points
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 6:12pm@Autum Knight:
You read those two boys kissing as… sensual?
I read that peck on the lips as furtive. They were clearly doing it to make a point for the video, not doing it to do it.
If that’s what you consider sensual… you need to get out more.
Report Post »KStret
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 6:35pmLesbianPackingHollow Points,
Report Post »Are you seriously attempting to argue that there is no difference between small children innocently kissing each other and the the two young boys kissing each other in this video where the intent was clearly sexual?
toto
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 7:41pmYou don’t have to be a Bible toting Christian to see the destructiveness of the gay in your face mindset. I don’t think most people have a problem with gays who quietly live committed relationships. I have equal distain for promiscuity by anyone, gay or straight. Anyone heard that word lately? It is harmful to society and to your own children if you are promiscuous. The damage is to both physical and mental health. You only have to look around to see it.
Report Post »Autumknight
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 10:45pmuuuuu…. we’re not talking about a family picnic here… or a date at the rollerskate rink… this a video that quote: ““tries to propagandize young kids to become activists for gay marriage,” so YES, the kiss is sensual and intentionally so…. you dont have to go out much to put together the reasoning in this subject matter.
Report Post »Lesbian Packing Hollow Points
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 10:53pm@KSTRET:
That would depend on your definition of “innocently”. I saw nothing sexual in these two boys giving each other a peck on the lips for a point of view video. If anything, it was purest iconoclasm. “The adults, especially homophobes, get squicked out over this. Let’s do it!” You know. Kids has no interest whatsoever in doing something until dad orders him not to.
On the other hand, two children of different sexes/genders kissing as an expression of affection, that is much less innocent. I would have to be concerned that those two might try to take that further, while outside of direct adult supervision. A little playing doctor. The same sex kids, statisticly, not going to be playing doctor.
I think your bias against same sex PDAs of any level of sincerity blinds you to the simple fact of the existence of your bigotry.
Report Post »Lesbian Packing Hollow Points
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 10:56pm@Autum Knight:
Report Post »Okay. I don’t find propaganda sensual. You do. And your kind call me freaky.
KStret
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 2:17amLesbianPHP,
“That would depend on your definition of “innocently”. ‘
No it does not and you are dodging my point. Are the children in the picture you posted the equivalent of the two ten year old boys in the homosexual propaganda video holding hands and kissing the same way a couple would?
“I think your bias against same sex PDAs of any level of sincerity blinds you to the simple fact of the existence of your bigotry.”
Anyone who disagrees with you is a homophobic bigot but you can not answer a simple question? Why is that? If you answer that the children in the picture and the video are the same, you have zero credibility. At the same time, if you concede that they are not the same, you prove my point. What is left to do? Name calling time! You can not engage in any kind of substantive debate because you will lose the argument.
I take it that you believe that same sex marriage is a right , individual states do not have the right to define marriage, and a judge can impose same sex marriage on the people. Marriage has a definition and to include same sex couples in to the definition, you are redefining marriage. This has to mean that you believe that redefining marriage is a right. If redefining marriage is a right for homosexuals, the equal protection clause dictates that redefining marriage has to be a right for everyone. That would include bigamist and polygamist. Can I steal a page from your handbook? You aren’t polygaphobic are you? Why do you hate
Report Post »Lesbian Packing Hollow Points
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 11:57am@KSTRET:
There’s a principle in science. “Only change one thing at a time.” If you change two things about an experiment and rerun it, if you get a different result, you won’t know which aspect of the experiment is controlling the different outcome.
You’re trying to compare two completely different aspects of the same experiment, and I’m not biting on that unscientific debate tactic, and it’s chiving you off.
There are two separate and unrelated aspects to this issue. One, are the kids same sex or different sex? This question is blinding you to the second question. Is the kiss furtive and perfunctory for the purpose of getting a reaction to the kiss, not to be kissing in and of itself, or is the kiss in earnest and affectionate and, in the words of AutumKnight, sensual.
The two boys in this video were demonstrating a perfunctory homosexual kiss, not an affectionate homosexual kiss, but your emotional and intellectual range won’t let you process that. Maybe an example of a perfunctory heterosexual kiss would help illuminate you.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-w7QAEWudQ
If you can honestly claim that that kiss was– sensual– you’re insane, but at least you’re stubbornly consistent.
Report Post »KStret
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 9:06pmLesbian Packing Hollow Points
“There’s a principle in science……..You’re trying to compare two completely different aspect.”“
You are avoiding the issue. You were the one that posted the picture not me. As I said before you can not answer my question. If you say that they are the same, you have no credibility but you can not concede my point either. You have reverted to calling me a homophobic bigot again.
“The two boys in this video were demonstrating a perfunctory homosexual kiss, not an affectionate homosexual kiss,”
In other words the goal of the video was to portray two ten year old boys as homosexuals. Is that the same as two little kids kissing each other? No. Homosexuality is by definition is sexual. Homosexuals prefer to have sex with the same sex. Thus, portraying two boys as homosexuals by having their hands locked together and kissing each other on the lips implies that they are in a relationship with the same sex. That is not the same as the picture you posted, which means your argument has collapsed on it’s self.
Are the homosexual groups that have a problem with the video homophobic too? Are you polygaphobic?
Report Post »RANGER1965
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:11pmThe last days of the Roman Empire…
“How horrible it will be for those who call evil good and good evil, who turn darkness into light and light into darkness, who turn what is bitter into something sweet and what is sweet into something bitter.”
Report Post »loiloi
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:22pmDitto – we are following the final days script from the Roman Empire.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:48pmI never would have thought America would see the day that public display of children like this would be acceptable! How in the world can pro gay people try to defend homosexuality as not being anything more than gross sexual perversion is beyond me. If this is not sexual exploitation of children, I don’t know what is!
Report Post »That is just one of the problems with trying to ‘normalize’ homosexuality. It always continues in a downward spiral into even more heinous sexual depravity.
The Bible is very clear on the subject, despite efforts to interpret it to the homosexual’s agenda.
Yes! We are going the way of ancient Rome! It is a horrible thing to witness…………….
God help us please!!
Chet Hempstead
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 10:37pmEquality is good. Bigotry is evil. Love is sweet. Contempt is bitter. Repent.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:10pmI’m not going to watch that trash. Life’s too short. Next story please.
Report Post »the hawk
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:13pmPlease remove this crap ! I come here to get away from pictures -vedio’s of this crap!
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:56pmI did not watch the video either!…..I didn’t need to!
Report Post »I agree. I hate this vile garbage, but it is good to have this information of what is happening in/to our country. As vile and disgusting as it is.
I feel like washing my eyes out with soap and my mind with the Holy Spirit……………………..
tnusagirl
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 3:08pmI did watch it, although it made me sick. But I watched it to know what our kids are up against, since this is targeting them.
Report Post »agameofthrones
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:10pmI just threw up. A LOT!
Report Post »junior1971
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:10pmDoes sodom and gamora ring a bell to anyone?
Report Post »TrueAmericanConservativePatriot
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:15pmYes it rings a very very loud bell.
Report Post »CrazyJ
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:32pmand ur making their point for them. real nice.
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 7:47pmI guess if you really think that the story of Sodom and Gomorrah has some relevance to modern society, you won’t mind if a friend and I stop by to have some fun with your daughters. It would be downright inhospitable to say no.
Report Post »jobaugh1
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 9:25ammy thoughts too, where is child services
Report Post »twizfoshiz
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 10:18am@Chet – Exactly. Wish Christians would stop twisting the bible to support their agenda. And, yeah, I can say that, because I’m also a Christian (and a lesbian *GASP!*) and have read the LITERAL translation from Hebrew/Greek of every verse used to slay gays. Read it in the context of the story – instead of just using every verse with “homosexuality” as a blanket for every person. JESUS SAYS NOTHING ABOUT IT. That speaks volumes.
Report Post »Ebbertron
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:08pmNo tolerance for intolerance….AAAARRRRG!! lets use hateful words like “FCK” to say we hate hate! Wasnt homosexuality once classified as a psychological disorder in the DSM?
I dont really care that you want to stick your pickle in a hairy brown-eye, but you’ll never convince me its right, natural or that God made you that way.
Gays, socialists, etc are doing EXACTLY what they accuse the religious right of doing, legislating morality and FORCING everyone to adhere to their own twisted ideology.
Report Post »mernijo
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:20pmThe book,The Naked Communist, in 1958 stated that this will happen in order to bring our country down and destroy it, from within of course. I admire our founding father’s intent on establishing our government, its constitution.
Report Post »jparkin
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:31pmSo true.
Report Post »Leader1776
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 3:40pm@EBBERTRON
You are correct. Earlier DMSs did list homosexuality as a disease/mental disorder.
However, with DMSIII the verbiage began to soften and with IV much more so. At the same time a large homosexual contingent within the APA began to lobby/bully those responsible for writing the DSM about change the view. They also conjured up new ‘theories’ and studies about homosexuality to support their agenda. Doubt it is mentioned today in the DSM. More hilarious is the fact that homophobia be be listed there as a disorder, but not homosexuality. Gotta remember …… psychiatrists may be very intelligent, but not necessarily when it comes to the underlying science.
Report Post »Just someone
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 5:11pm@Ebbertron – Yeah – and they also once had proof positive that a black man‘s brain was not capable of being as intelligent as a white man’s brain. So, the use of older sciences in a day rued by creating policy based on one’s ideology, may not be your best argument here.
Report Post »Ebbertron
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 5:23pmIt was an aside….hardly the basis of any argument as you’ve supposed. My argument is that no matter how many laws you change, it will never be an acceptable or embraced way of life as far as I’m concerned.
Report Post »insimpleterms
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:08pmThey are returning hate for perceived hate. Their anger and resentment couldn’t be any more blatant. How can they preach tolerance while simultaneously being intolerant? They are only showing who they really are and they are too blind to see it.
Report Post »coryf076
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:08pmone thing I’ve wondered when i see homosexual characters on TV or and openly gay person playing a straight character…why is it okay for a gay person to play a straight person on TV, or a straight person to play a gay person? But if a white person played a black, or a mexican played an asian, or a black played a mexican….people would lose it….why is that? I thought it was taboo in hollyweird for a person of one race to play a character of another race…
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:17pmWatch an old TV western, like Wagon Train or Gunsmoke, every race color and creed played indians in those things.
Report Post »coryf076
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:23pmCool….I don’t know why, but I was always under the impression that it was taboo for certain races to play other races….that obviously made me wonder about the gays playing straight and straight playing gay….guess I was wrong….not the first time or last.
Report Post »cookcountypatriot
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:07pmthe bottom of the barrel folks…….these degenerates are off the charts sickos
Report Post »Onemanclan
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 4:37pmLMAO. Well described.
Report Post »VoiceFromTheRIght
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:07pmIn a word, disgusting!
Report Post »liberalsarealiens
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:06pmNothing here but PERVERTS! You all need your A$$ kicked for bringing kids into this. And you wonder why you are dispised so much?
Report Post »LadyIzShy
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:06pmoh my.. content warning VERY needed cant be;ieve i watched it all.. that was AWFUL disgusting VILE and just plan offensive.. wow wow wow..sick sad sorry. wow im stunned here
Report Post »heavyduty
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:06pmBeing gay is a state of mind, if that’s the way you want to think of yourself. No one has been or will ever be born gay. You watch small children on videos and you will never see them kissing another of the same sex. They always go after the opposite sex. That tells me that no one is born gay.
Report Post »Untameable-kate
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:12pmWether or not they are born that way doesn’t interest me at all, I could not care less. They are not winning me over to their side by insulting me and throwing vulgarities in my face. If they want to have a commitment ceremony and get the same rights a normal people I also don’t care. PLEASE just stop the crass behavior, it is dusgusting and it make me think they are a bunch of perverted a-holes (more then I already do).
Report Post »Onemanclan
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 4:43pmRight and if babies were born gay how come they don’t talk with a flamboyant lisp when they are children? LOL..
Report Post »dinadp
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:05pmPuke is right! There have to be better ways to get your point across.
Report Post »adouglass1
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:10pmFacebook needs a dislike button!!
Report Post »SLIDELLMAN
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:05pmThis. Is. Sick. Expect the usual suspects to come out of the woodwork to defend it.
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:15pmThat will do more harm than good for gay rights. Here‘s a crazy Idea government should get out of the marriage business the only reason they’re in it is TAXES. You want more gay right push for the flat tax and end the IRS’S Oppressive hold on individual rights. And the court system needs to get out of the divorce business Marriages should in no way be tied to any federal or state judical systems. IT’S A PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP ISSUE
Report Post »SLIDELLMAN
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 3:02pm@smithclar3enc3 Thanks for proving my point.
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 3:29pmNo problem…. I‘m in no way defending in fact I pointe to the fact that this does more harm than good as their target audience might like it but that target doesn’t vote and or can’t vote. And the people who do vote will see this as vulgar tripe.
Report Post »I just followed up by pointing out the obvious the government has no business being in involved in a commitment between two or more consenting adults. And courts have no right arbitrating the break-up between those adults. IT’S PERSONAL BUSINESS NOT STATE OR FEDERAL BUSINESS
let us prey
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:04pmThat video all by itself is reason enough. Agenda pushing freak shows.
Report Post »OhioMarcus
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:04pmI’m gay and think this ad is stupid and way over the top, and whats wrong with a civil ceremony anyway?!
Report Post »VTDave
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:33pmIf that was the end that was being sought there probably would be no problem. If you have your head in the sand and believe that then you had better educate yourself about the complete agenda behind the gay rights movement.
Report Post »Virginia Rebel
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:46pmHere‘s what’s wrong with “gay marriage”: After gays can get” married,” other people are forced to participate against their own values and standards. The government gets involved, businesses get more regulated forcing people to serve the gays, and we move further away from the American idea and closer to socialism. States that don’t have gay marriage yet: battle it with all your strength and might.
http://lite1059.com/rssItem.asp?feedid=118&itemid=29695881
Report Post »Truthbeliever2
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:04pm*Makes throw up sounds*
Report Post »UlyssesP
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:03pmWhat does Americas Muslim population think of this. I’d be curious.
Report Post »No no… not curious THAT way!
Bonnieblue2A
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:02pmVile and disgusting. If this is the future of this country we may as well default on the national debt today!
Report Post »adouglass1
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:01pmMore reasons why I don’t agree and never will. Make your point by attacking the very same people you are trying to get some agreement from. Thats the gay way to be gay!!
Report Post »TexasCommonSense
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:01pmThe further decline of our society.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:14pm@TexasCommonSense
Don’t think we can use the word “decline” anymore.
The bottom has been reached.
Report Post »Uncurable wound
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:26pmThe scary part is were not close to the bottom yet…
Report Post »Prepare while you have time…and there isnt to much time left,this is really starting to go fast…
TexasCommonSense
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 3:20pmI’m not sure with which of you I should agree. I sincerely hoe it’s the bottom, but I fear it’s not.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 5:21pm@TEX
Yep, I don’t think we can go any further down. What remains to be seen now, is whether we turn right, or left.
Can we choose wisely?
Report Post »Sola Scriptura
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 2:00pmMajority of Minnesotans do not want Gay Marriage. It is already banned, but the amendment would define it as One Man-One Woman. Luckily the people will vote on it, Mad Mark cant veto it.
Report Post »BrerRabbit
Posted on July 20, 2011 at 1:59pmPuke !
Report Post »