Ex-Aide to Ron Paul Makes Stunning Claims About Old Boss: Anti-Israel, 9/11 Truther, Doesn’t Believe U.S. Had Any Business Fighting Hitler
- Posted on December 26, 2011 at 9:42pm by
Christopher Santarelli
- Print »
- Email »
AP
Eric Dondero, who worked for Ron Paul on and off for a total of 12 years dating back to 1987, released a jaw-dropping statement in Right Wing News Monday in regards to his old boss. It appears Dondero wrote the statement to answer questions presented to him of late by various media outlets in regards to controversial newsletters connected to the congressman that have consumed his campaign for President. While attempting to defend Paul as not being a “racist” or “homophobic,” as many have accused him of being given the hateful language in the newsletters, Dondero “sets the record straight” by making shocking claims about the beliefs and behind-closed-doors statements of the man vying to be Commander in Chief. The Paul campaign has already reacted to Dondero’s claims, labeling him as a disgruntled ex-employee. Nonetheless, the allegations are astounding.
Dondero begins by strongly refuting claims that Paul is a “racist,” saying he never heard Paul make any racist comments in the 12 years he worked for the man, and makes clear that the congressman has frequently hired blacks and Hispanics for his office staff. However, Dondero makes “one caveat,“ stating that Paul is ”out of touch,” with both Hispanic and Black culture:
“He is completely clueless when it comes to Hispanic and Black culture, particularly Mexican-American culture. And he is most certainly intolerant of Spanish and those who speak strictly Spanish in his presence, (as are a number of Americans, nothing out of the ordinary here.)”
Dondero, who is half-Jewish himself, says Paul is not Anti-Semitic. He says Paul has no issue with Jewish-Americans and can “categorically” say that he has never heard anything Anti-Semitic, slurs or any sort of derogatory marks come out of Paul’s mouth. However, Dondero claims Paul is “most certainly Anti-Israel, and Anti-Israeli in general:”
“He wishes the Israeli state did not exist at all. He expressed this to me numerous times in our private conversations. His view is that Israel is more trouble than it is worth, specifically to the America taxpayer. He sides with the Palestinians, and supports their calls for the abolishment of the Jewish state, and the return of Israel, all of it, to the Arabs.”
Dondero moves to the claims that Rep. Paul is a “homo-phobe.“ The former aide claims that Paul is not bigoted towards homosexuals but ”personally uncomfortable” around them. Dondero points to two instances to back his claims. One being in 1988, when Paul was staying with an openly gay Libertarian supporter for a 3-day campaign swing in the SF Bay Area, and pulled the young personal assistant aside demanding Dondero find a bathroom he could use because he did not want to use the one at his homosexual friend’s home. The second instance occurred many years later when a fellow staffer told Dondero that Paul allegedly swatted away a handshake from flamboyant gay man who was a “hardcore campaign supporter.”
Eric Dondero (Libertarian.net)
After giving his piece on the areas he feels the “liberal media is ferociously attacking Ron” on, like “stupid and whacky things on race and gays he may have said or written in the past,” Dondero moves to what he considers the real problem with his old boss: foreign policy.
Based on countless “arguments/discussions” with Paul over the years, Dondero claims that no matter how hard the candidate denies it “Ron Paul is most assuredly an isolationist.”
“For example, he strenuously does not believe the United States had any business getting involved in fighting Hitler in WWII. He expressed to me countless times, that ‘saving the Jews,’ was absolutely none of our business. When pressed, he often times brings up conspiracy theories like FDR knew about the attacks of Pearl Harbor weeks before hand, or that WWII was just ‘blowback,’ for Woodrow Wilson’s foreign policy errors, and such. ”
Moving to more contemporary subjects, Dondero states “with absolute certainty” that Paul was opposed to the War in Afghanistan and to any military reaction to the 9/11 attacks.
“He immediately stated to us staffers, me in particular, that Bush/Cheney were going to use the attacks as a precursor for ‘invading’ Iraq. He engaged in conspiracy theories including perhaps the attacks were coordinated with the CIA, and that the Bush administration might have known about the attacks ahead of time. He expressed no sympathies whatsoever for those who died on 9/11, and pretty much forbade us staffers from engaging in any sort of memorial expressions, or openly asserting pro-military statements in support of the Bush administration.”
Dondero claims that Paul, up to the eve of the resolution vote, was telling staffers that he planned to vote “No” on a resolution initiating the War in Afghanistan. Dondero claims that all of the congressman’s district staff told his Chief of Staff that they would immediately resign if Ron voted “No.”
“At the very last minute Ron switched his stance and voted ‘Yay,’ much to the great relief of Jackie and I. He never explained why, but I strongly suspected that he realized it would have been political suicide; that staunchly conservative Victoria would revolt, and the Republicans there would ensure that he would not receive the nomination for the seat in 2002.”
The claims come just over a week before the start of Republican primary voting.
Eric Dondero was a Senior Aide to Congressman Paul from 1997-2003, Ron Paul for Congress Campaign Coordinator from 1995-1996, National Organizer for Draft Ron Paul for President from 1991-1992, and a personal assistant for Ron, Libertarian for President from 1987-1988. That said, Dondero’s claims should be taken with a grain of salt.
Paul campaign manager Jesse Benton emailed The Weekly Standard Sunday afternoon in regards to Dondero’s latest statement:
“Eric Dondero is a disgruntled former staffer who was fired for performance issues. He has zero credibility and should not be taken seriously.”
A Facebook group was created during the 2008 campaign, titled “Eric Dondero is Slime!” making similar allegations to Benton, that Dondero is a disgruntled former employee attempting to enact an unjust revenge on his former boss.
Dondero disputes he was fired, telling CBS News he resigned in 2003 after going “back and forth” with Paul for months. Dondero even challenged Paul for his congressional seat in 2007.
Dondero is currently the publisher and editor of LibertarianRepublican.net.
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 688 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 536 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 458 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 374 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 333 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 300 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 313 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 209 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 148 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 301 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 300 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (563)
Detroit paperboy
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:32pmLet me see , he thinks people shoul speak english, check…. A little uncomfortable around gays, check… Thinks Woodrow Wilson was a progessive douche bag, check…. Thinks Israel is a drain on the American taxpayer, check….. And wants to cut a trillion from our Federal criminal Govt, not in ten years, but the first year, check…… Hell im votin for him for sure now !!!!!!
Report Post »chicago76
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:37pmAmen brother
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:38pmThinks Isreal should not exist
Thinks we shouldn’t have going to war with Germany.
Thinks we shouldn’t have responded to 9/11
Report Post »ZengaPA65
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:46pmRon Paul 2012 !!!!!
Report Post »TulsaYeeHaw
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:53pmDidn‘t say he thinks Israel shouldn’t exist, said he wishes they didn’t (probably from context of the mess WE are involved in). And regardless, why is MY responsibility to take care of them? They nuke anyone into oblivion, they can defend themselves.
We allied with someone far worse than Hitler (Stalin) to defeat Hitler. Hitler wrecked Stalin’s plan to let Germany and Britain smash europe again, while waiting for war between the US and Japan to invade europe with his own conquest (stalin knew of impending war between the US and Japan). Then, to give “thanks” to Stalin for “HIS HELP” we betrayed the Koumintang, and more or less handed China to the Reds. I’m not saying we were wrong for fighting the Germans, but for God’s sake, this ignoring of who our allies were is ridiculous (for example, we allied with Ho Chi Minh in french indochina, which led to our involvement in vietnam)
Stated repeatedly no response to 9-11 …….WITHOUT A DECLARED STATE OF WAR.
Yeah, terrible.
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:56pm@TUL
So you think we should have allied with Hiter instead?
On 9/11 we had a declaration of war, they declared war on the US.
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:59pm@thefakeconservativetroll……I’m STILL waiting for just ONE video, ONE recording, ONE speech, ONE anything where Ron Paul is himself advocating for the end of Isreal as a nation….YOU HAVE CLAIMED HE DOES SO SHOW ME THE PROOF, Let the people on the blaze be witness to the facr you will sidestep and point to some clown looking for a job as your proof! tic toc tic toc tic toc…..JUST ONE SPOOKY.
Report Post »82dAirborne
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:00pm…..Thinks that 9/11 was an inside job -CHECK. …Thinks that blacks live to pick up their welfare checks – CHECK. ….Thinks that it is A-Okay that Iran gets WMD’s – CHECK… Votes for and then against pork in bills – CHECK.
Has no chance of being POTUS- CHECKMATE.
Report Post »TulsaYeeHaw
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:03pm@realconservative.
OF COURSE THAT IS EXACTLY WHERE YOU GO.
HUH, we should have allied with Hitler instead???? HMMMM
BE HONEST GOD Damnit!!!!!! We can‘t talk unless you aren’t interested in crap like that!!!!
YOU KNOW THAT IS NOT WHAT I MEANT. You made a decision to imply that it was. YOU ARE NOT HONEST.
Maybe, we should have let Nat’l Socialist Germany and the Communist Soviet Union destroy each other, instead of helping a man who murdered TWICE THE people hitler did, by an easy margin.
STOP LYING.
Report Post »TulsaYeeHaw
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:04pmOH, and great comeback….they declared war on us……
When did congress vote for a declaration?
OH, THEY DIDN’T. Did they?
Report Post »poverty.sucks
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:07pm@82 – Good move.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:12pmThis guy comes out — gets his 10 minutes of fame — then goes back into the wall paper. He did it in 2008 as well.
I’m voting Ron Paul!
Do not return evil for evil. 1 Peter 3:8
Make every effort to live in peace with all men and be holy Hebrews 12:14
The weapons we fight with are not the weapons of the world. 2 Corinthians 10:4
For though we live in the world, we do not wage war as the world does. 2 Corinthians 10:3
Not by might, nor by power, but by my spirit Zechariah 4:6
Wisdom is better than weapons of war Ecclesiastes 9:18
The unfaithful have a craving for violence. Proverbs 13:2
It is not by sword or spear that the Lord saves 1 Samuel 17:47
There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment. The one who fears is not made perfect in love. 1 John 4:18
Whoever listens to me will live in safety and be at ease, without fear of harm. Proverbs 1:33
Matt 5:43-44
43 Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour,
and hate thine enemy.
44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you,
do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully
use you, and persecute you;
Make every effort to live in peace with all men and be holy Hebrews 12:14
I John 4:20
Report Post »If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar:
for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he
love God whom he hath not seen?
TulsaYeeHaw
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:13pm@82nd Airborne
Good comments.
I disagree, but you raise excellent points.
We desparately need a libertarian who doesn‘t want to use gov’t for anything other than protecting our individual liberty.
Report Post »-Not advancing democracy (which leads to dictators, all throughout history)
-Not making sure people can retire (SSI)
-Not “protecting” me from someone who wants to get high in his house (if they can consume alcohol then they can smoke pot, and I don’t care if they have kids, you can drink in front of kids and gov‘t CAN’T FIX THAT no matter how wrong it is)
-Not fixing unemployment
-Not making illegal aliens feel confortable
and on, and on, and on……
The progressives must be defeated.
therealconservative
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:23pm@TUL
“We allied with someone far worse than Hitler (Stalin) to defeat Hitler” your words. You made the implication. Yes Stalin was a dictator that killed millons, however at that time Stalin was not taking over Europe (he didn’t have the army to do it, thats why he allied with us). You also forget that Hitler wrote Mein Kampf, where he made it clear what he would do. Noone listened, everyone said ‘it’s not our problem’
9/11
Ron Paul only voted in favor of war because he knew his job was in the balance, not to protect the country.
Report Post »bafdjack
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:25pmWe need to get our (USA) house in order before helping Any other nation. I’m voting for Ron Paul.
82dAirborne
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:28pmOnce again: I do not dislike Ron Paul I would make him Sec. Of the Treas. in a heartbeat. I do not believe he would make a godd POTUS.
Report Post »snoopydaniels
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:31pmI would just like to point out that generations of so-called “pro-Israel” Presidents have been dictating domestic and foreign policy to Israel for decades. I suspect that Israel will be much better off under a non-interventionist President Paul than under any of his meddling predecessors, who, in their eagerness for peace have coerced the Israelis into giving up two thirds of their land over the years. I look forward to the day that President Paul strips away billions of dollars in foreign aid from the enemies of Zion and allows Israel to undertake her OWN defense however she sees fit.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:34pmNot that long ago I seem recall Pailbots piling on Cain over his girlfriends ….without any evidence. Now that Paul’s girlfriend (Eric Dondero) has come out of the closet lets see if the Paulbots are so quick to pull the trigger. Taking bets.
Report Post »TulsaYeeHaw
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:37pmStalin DID HAVE plans to conquer Europe.
- They had already invaded Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Belorus, Ukraine, and then HELPED Gremany invade Poland. They split Poland in half, as par the Molotov-Ribbentrop Non Aggression Pact.
-His army was twice the size of the Wehrmacht at the beginning of the war. TWICE THE SIZE.
-His plan was for the US and Japan to bludgeon each other while Germany and England smashed europe again, using the time to rebuild his officer corps. Then invade (remember they had already invaded half of eastern europe) western europe and have the Red Army march all the way to Portugal. There is a reason this isn’t taught in history classes.
- As far as mein kampf, have you read what the Red Revolutionaries said in Russia during and right after the Civil War? There weren’t any good guys there. And don‘t believe what isn’t true. We didn’t enter the war for any reason resembling helping Jewish people. We entered to help Britain and France, plus naively hoping we could show the Soviet’s (not Russians, the Soviets) we were good people, never bothering to think maybe they were just flat out evil.
I’ll even throw you a bone: Germany declared war on us first…..Ron Paul has it wrong in that way. Our declaration was a response to theirs, as most American’s viewed Japan as our enemy. And I don’t necessarily agree, I think we should have fought them, becuase they were attacking our freighters and warships. Not to mention they were pretty e
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:41pmEric Dondero: “I am a former Cain supporter, now a Libertarian for Mitt!”
That’s what his December 4 post on his Facebook page says
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=733113561
“We need a squeeky clean candidate against Obama. Zero baggage. And that’s Zero, not 5% or even 1%. Huntsman or Romney. I’m a fmr. Cain supporter, now a Libertarian for Mitt!”
Romney has zero baggage? Ha ha ha….no wonder this guy has zero credibility.
Report Post »Sherbidi
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:42pmI suggest the following youtube videos:
Report Post »watch?v=_6hxE3mPgtM
watch?v=8zGCdHelRvE
watch?v=51-KA-Nc3_k
Vechorik
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:44pmIt’s becoming painfully clear to me that this is the entire strategy. Make enough headlines saying Ron Paul is teh raycist!!11!!!! or whatever and people will link the two things in their minds.
This all depends on the vast majority not bothering to do their own research and relying on the logic that “if enough people are saying it there must be something to it”.
Isn’t there a quote somewhere that goes something like “tell a big enough lie over and over and people will believe it”
Report Post »Scottsman
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:45pmRight on DETROIT PAPERBOY!
Report Post »Jedrin
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:50pmthe USA is on the wrong path and has been for a long time, FDR, Nixon taking us off the gold standard and I remember pealing for or five price stickers off cans of food to see how much it had gone up in a week, Ron Paul is the ONLY one that is contrary. Santorum wants more wars, Bachman is tooo much trying to make the Tea Party a political party instead of what it is, a popular protest by average people. Romney and Newt seem Elitist and really not much change from what we have. Time for some real change, it may be too late now anyway but there is some “hope’ id Paul can get in.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:53pmIsraelis are great people and I respect their choice of living by Self Reliance and Independence. That is one reason I think they are our best friend because we too use to live by that motto. Seems we have forgotten it…Ron Paul is not anti-Israel. Ron Paul is against a dependent Israeli state and our involvement as if it’s American territory.
Ron Paul is not a “truther” but he might of questioned it like every American did as well and than said no way.
As for the “resolution” to invade Afghanistan and his reluctance to vote “yes” immediately is something I would respect as his concerns became true. Ron was concerned the afghan war would be used to invade Iraq and that happened when Bush tried to link al-Qaeda to Iraq. Ron was reluctant to give PROGRESSIVE Bush open war powers. Good for Ron.
Nothing wrong with being uncomfortable when someone is speaking a foreign language around you. Not being able to communicate makes us all uncomfortable..
Ron Paul is getting my vote!
Report Post »booger71
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:56pmtherealconservative
Report Post »Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:38pm
————————
You forgot the big one, feels no sympathy for the 9/11 victims.
Cottoneyed77
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:57pmIs 77 years old…check. Being against the State of Israel is anti-Zionist, and directly at odds with the Lord Jesus Christ…….check. Is a certifiable nut….check. Not wanting the United States to enter WWII because the “Jews weren’t worth saving”, in my book is as anti-Semitic as was the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem during the war. For some background, Google, the “Grand Mufti of Jerusalem” and Heinrich Himmler. It’s clear that RuPaul is just an old fart, who’s anti-Semitic, and if instituted, his foreign policy would destabilize the Middle East and force Israel into a war for her very survival, and the eventual use of nuclear weapons.
Report Post »sambachico
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 12:02amIt appears the blaze has joined into the panic mode pandemonium to throw as much half-truths and Ammo at Paul as possible. “The truth lives here” is the GBTV motto? That’s about as original as fair and balanced from fox news.
Report Post »garyM
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 12:09amI think yall are mistaken about what Ron Paul was thinking, i don’t think the man thinks he just talks!
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 12:41amVechorik, I always liked the saying mostly attributed to Abe Lincoln: “You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all of the time, but you cannot fool all the people all of the time.” The media has been doing that for a long time. They are fooling less and less all of the time these days.
Report Post »sambachico
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 12:42amEric Dondero – Libertarianrepublican.net
- Background section from website
We’ve been around since 2005. (Formerly MainstreamLibertarian.com which evolved out of the 2004 Libertarians for Bush effort.)
This guy is an absolute fraud. Any libertarian in their right mind would object to Bush on the simple grounds of the passage of the patriot act after 9/11. How about the bailouts, crony capitalism? Unfortunately for Eric, it’s only convenient that he calls himself a libertarian when he has supported big government candidates who not only helped to destroy our country through bailouts and taxation, but on violating the civil rights of every single American. Eric Dondero is a Koch brothers type of libertarian, or I should call it LINO – libertarian in name only.
I smell an opportunistic rat here, 7 days before the Iowa primary, and it’s not Ron Paul. I guess theblaze and the rest of the media is trying to swift-boat Ron Paul at this point.
Report Post »KICKILLEGALSOUT
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 12:51amBut really, why should we believe hearsay? I don’t trust anything the media says or something a supposed EX aide to Dr. Paul supposed knows about him. Let me say this, there is no perfect candidate, but Dr. Paul it light years ahead of the other candidates who are all puppets and want to push us into the New World Order even further.
“Freedom is not defined by safety. Freedom is defined by the ability of citizens to live without government interference. Government cannot create a world without risks, nor would we really wish to live in such a fictional place. Only a totalitarian society would even claim absolute safety as a worthy ideal, because it would require total state control over its citizens’ lives. Liberty has meaning only if we still believe in it when terrible things happen and a false government security blanket beckons.”
- Ron Paul
“The most basic principle to being a free American is the notion that we as individuals are responsible for our own lives and decisions. We do not have the right to rob our neighbors to make up for our mistakes, neither does our neighbor have any right to tell us how to live, so long as we aren’t infringing on their rights. Freedom to make bad decisions is inherent in the freedom to make good ones. If we are only free to make good decisions, we are not really free.”
Report Post »- Ron Paul
Eliasim
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:01amIt seems to me Ron Paul is probably taking into consideration the tens of thousands of service members killed in WW2 for “Ungrateful” Europe etc. and not only were tens of thousands killed, but it amounted to millions and millions of families whose roots were cut-off from their fathers. Hasn’t anyone ever heard that “The ones that died were the ones really fighting?”
Report Post »Eliasim
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:04amWe live in the age of “Human” worship, and the Nation of Israel was built by men who deemed themselves Kings of the world just as much as Israel was rebuilt by Kings all through history to flex their own might.
Report Post »Eliasim
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:06amIn other words: it was the devil that built Israel, and the devil is going to tear it back down.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:11amDondero was Ron Paul’s adversary.. He challenged him for his Congressional seat in 2007..How would you like a jerk like that worlking for you?
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:14amA Doctor’s LABOR IS NOT MY RIGHT posted this earlier this evening. An Open Letter To The Jewish Coalition
Report Post »http://lewrockwell.com/block/block186.html
ashestoashes
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:17amRemember..Ron Paul was the only one to vote for Iran’s right to bomb Iran years ago.. That does‘t sound like a man who doesn’t recognize Isael’s right to exist as a state.
Report Post »Eliasim
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:19amRon Paul’s against the monopoly of the Federal Reserve and they have set out to destroy him, and that‘s what it’s all about.
Report Post »stopspendingourmoney
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:44amHHmmm sounds a bit fishy to me, and when did the blaze get in the he said she said business? do they have any proof of these claims? I have seen Ron Paul voting record, I have seen what he stands for he is the best candidate for pres, if you look at all of the past records of the others running and seen that they were for the patriot act, bail outs, and so on, Ron Paul was right on all of these things, he is the only one running that will admit America is broke, and not just tell people what they want to hear like the others, he still has my vote, I commend anyone to do their homework on the others running, check there past, I have checked them all none perfect, but Ron Paul still the best pick out of Bunch, I will still be voting for him. Ron Paul 2012!! God bless all of you, and America, let us all pray for her and us living here that we can be a good example to the world and she will remain a great country.
Report Post »Libertarian B 4 Libertarians Were Cool
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:44amHey “The Blaze”, shove your ad hominem hatchet job up your arses! Ron Paul 2012… We are awake. It doesn’t work anymore!
Report Post »KeystoneState
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:50amDoes this guy live in David Axelrod’s building too?
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 2:03am@THEREALCONSERVATIVE Paul is the only one who voted for Israel’ right to Bomb Iran? Does that sound like he denies their right to exist?
Report Post »Ron Paul said that 9/11 was blowback..that was the findings of CIA investigations..and you didn’t hear after 9/11 that the administration was warned about the 9/11 attacks before they happened and they disregarded them? I heard..
Paul is a Constitutionalist.. that means he defends our right to carry..had people been allowed to carry..it is likely that 9/11 would have been a completely different story..
Paul would never have allied with Hitler..If he had intervened at all it would have been through a Congressional decision. THen he would have gone in..won it ..and gotten out..he wouldn’t have turned it into a blood money war like Viet Nam..
hurricanerigger
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 2:43amRon Paul is the Republican Obama. Another fool that will lead us into disaster only in the opposite direction. Obviously followed by a bunch of idiots who are misinformed by reading politics in the National Enquirer. Fools, there was more Kool Aid left than drunk in Jonestown! All you militants commies on the right, conspiracy theorists, Atheist are with Paul. Base your research in facts and not conjectures and assumptions. Derrangement goes both ways and this column is full of them. Apparently it is a sport in America to give away your country to the first idiot that runs for president. FOOLS!!!
Report Post »KICKILLEGALSOUT
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 3:15amNow it’s official, I knew this guy was a scam. How many people know that this guy ran for congress against Dr. Paul and lost? Maybe bitter about the defeat, trying to be an opportunist at Dr. Paul’s expense? Many are also saying he is a Rick Perry supporter and may have something to do with that.
Report Post »TeaParty_RonPaul_R3VOLUTION
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 3:42amIt’s amazing how stupid the typical neo-con is-look at who Ron Paul claims to be his mentors, people like Hayek, his friend is Peter Schiff also jewish.
The media is so scared of Ron Paul, it shows how they want to do everything in their power to destroy not only Paul, but the whole liberty movement.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 6:10amBlazers, I want to provide some resources on the Pearl Harbor and WW2 issues.
See here.
Did FDR Provoke Pearl Harbor?
http://lewrockwell.com/buchanan/buchanan198.html
And here.
Rethinking the Good War
http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance181.html
The issue of the so-called “isolationist” policies of our Founding Fathers is addressed in that last one, as well.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 6:41am“Chickens coming home to roost” and 3 infamous Americans who used the distasteful phrase in a distasteful way…
Malcom X: Check!
Rearend J. Wright: Check!
RON PAUL: CHECK!
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:12amHere is the Girl’s Resume crying in the Video over Ron Paul’s book and a Pic
Emily Schrader
California State Chair Students for Rick Perry
June 2011 – Present (7 months)
Assistant Development Director StandWithUs Nonprofit; 51-200 employees; Nonprofit Organization Management industry
January 2011 – Present (1 year) Greater Los Angeles Area
Chief of Staff USC College Republicans
2011 – 2011 (less than a year)
Intern U.S. Congressman Dana Rohrabacher
May 2011 – August 2011 (4 months)
Deputy Los Angeles Regional Vice Chair California College Republicans Nonprofit; 11-50 employees; Political Organization industry
2010 – 2011 (1 year)
USC President Christians United For Israel Nonprofit; 51-200 employees; Public Relations and Communications industry
2010 – 2011 (1 year)
Communications Director Students For Carly, Carly Fiorina for U.S. Senate
June 2010 – November 2010 (6 months)
Los Angeles Regional Chair Students for Meg, Meg Whitman for Governor 2010 Government Agency; 501-1000 employees; Political Organization industry
May 2010 – November 2010 (7 months)
Intern Office of US Senator Wayne Allard
June 2007 – August 2008 (1 year 3 month)
Emily Schrader’s Additional Information
Interests: Israel, U.S. Politics
Groups and Associations: College Republicans, Students For Israel, Trojans For Israel
http://www.google.com/imgres?q=emily+schrader+usc&hl=en&sa=X&biw=1152&bih=607&tbm=isch&prmd=imvnso
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:20amsorry ran out of space. here is the pic of her
Report Post »http://www.google.com/imgres?q=emily+schrader+usc&hl=en&sa=X&biw=1152&bih=607&tbm=isch&prmd=imvnso&tbnid=V2v2YhtuNIeP4M:&imgrefurl=http://twitter.com/emilykschrader&docid=cUWL3k9cCai9bM&imgurl=http://a0.twimg.com/profile_images/1410512948/Photo_on_2010-11-30_at_19.07.jpg&w=500&h=375&ei=SD_5TqvUKqWW2AX1uv2yAg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=97&vpy=144&dur=154&hovh=194&hovw=259&tx=173&ty=130&sig=110196126369582669330&page=1&tbnh=128&tbnw=177&start=0&ndsp=21&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0
KTsayz
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:21amSo we have Dondero saying he ‘resigned’ and Ron Paul describing him as a “disgruntled former employee” who “literally was put out” during a 2007 “Meet the Press” interview with Tim Russert.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=en4wM1VIVXE
(It’s actually a very good interview.)
So the pravda blaze expects me to believe Dondee over Ron Paul? HAHAHAHAHAHA
In a CNN poll, Ron Paul does the best with non-white voters when compared to the other candidates. Guess that squashes all these ‘racist’ barbs.
And can someone PLEASE explain Cottoneyed’s (do you suffer from perpectual pinko eye?) insane comment: “Being against the State of Israel is anti-Zionist, and directly at odds with the Lord Jesus Christ”
Report Post »When did Jesus say that if someone is against the State of Israel they will be at odds with Him? I can’t seem to find that in any of the Gospels in my Bible. Actually, I didn’t know the State of Israel existed back then.
txbigfoot
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:34amRon Paul is not mainstream and not prime time. He will NEVER get the nomination no matter how mindless his followers are. This guy is world class scary as hell. If you think Obama is trying to destroy is, get this creep anywhere near the White house and were screwed. NO RP or ABO in 2012.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:38am@REPUBLCORP “Not that long ago I seem recall Pailbots piling on Cain over his girlfriends ….without any evidence. Now that Paul’s girlfriend (Eric Dondero) has come out of the closet lets see if the Paulbots are so quick to pull the trigger. Taking bets.”
Report Post »That is completely untrue REPUBLICORP.. The people for Ron Paul never focused on his girlfriends..We did not care about that..Apparently you did.. We focused on the issues only and none of the Cain people cared about the issues except for what 9/9/9 was going to get them which was going to be total control in the end.. But even Cain endorsed Ron Paul…This young man has political ambitions and is using Paul to get there..If he ever had a shot..he has been exposed..he will go no where..We want a Constitutionalist for this country because that is our only hope..But if the end is near..welll then that is just the way it is..but we will pretend it is not and vote for us.. Nice try though.
H Beale
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:41amThis is exactly what the liars and attention whores did to Herman Cain!
The cockroaches and leeches are oozing out of the woodwork now that Ron Paul has nudged to the top. The mental midgets in the media have already crowned Romney. He is the one that the corporations want in the White House. What the people want is of no concern or value. Enjoy your servitude sheeple. You deserve what you will more than likely get.
Tokyo Rose pales in comparison to the paid off shills and propagandists in the US. Sickening!
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:52am@HURRICANERIGGER Yes..that’s right..we are all abunch of conspiracy theorists…remember the rules of Saul Alinsky..a lie is the truth and the truth is a lie..Any conspiracy is just a theory even if it is proven true..A brainiac..you probably think that Agenda 21 is just a conspiracy too..right? You can google ..It was signed by George H Bush back in the 80s and was spoken of by Henry Kissinger.. he said that the NWO would not be liked by the American people but that it would be for their own good..Did you know that government officials just met at the World Summit to discuss their plans for us using the Global Warming Scam? Yeah! They discussed 100 new taxes for us …that means the ole Cap and Trade..but maybe you think that is a conspiracy too.. They wanted to tax us 300-350 each month just on electricity alone not to mention the other taxes.. It just astounds me how clueless most of you Neo Cons are..
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:54amPaul is to the right of Romney and Gingrich on every issue conservatives find unsettling about both candidates. But Paul does dissent from contemporary Republican orthodoxy on foreign policy. It is without question foreign policy that makes Paul “unelectable” in the eyes of the Republican establishment but Romney and Gingrich ultimately acceptable despite their countless big-government offenses.
Even the slightest hint that a Republican candidate could be wandering off the neocon reservation causes immediate alarm. During a Republican debate in June, Romney dared to say: “It’s time for us to bring our troops home as soon as we possibly can … our troops shouldn’t go off and try and fight a war of independence for another nation.”
Politico’s Ben Smith reported: “Danielle Pletka, vice president for foreign and defense policy studies at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said her inbox was flooded Tuesday morning with emails calling Romney’s comments a ‘disaster.’”
“I’d thought of Romney as a mainstream Republican — supporting American strength and American leadership, but this doesn’t reflect that,” she said. “Romney has proven himself a little bit of a weathervane and I guess he senses that positioning himself in this place is good for his campaign — attempting to appease Ron Paul’s constituents without actually being Ron Paul.”
more http://dailycaller.com/2011/12/27/why-the-establishment-really-fears-ron-paul
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 10:32amLMFAO @ “Stunning claims”…
This is the same fabricated garbage that they’ve been trying to smear Ron Paul with for years, and it hasn’t worked.
He just dropped a colossal Moneybomb on your stupid little head. A bunker-buster.
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »TheWholeTruth
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 10:56amTHEREALCONSERVATIVE … Just WHO is ‘they’ in ‘they declared war on us?’ Iraq? Nope, debunked. Afghanistan? Nope umm I know IRAN! .. uh.. nope. Libya? Syria? WHO???
Don’t worry, all you war mongers. A court just decided that Iran was involved in 9/11. I don‘t know WHY Saudi Arabia isn’t listed since they vast majority of the pilots were Saudi. Oh WAIT.. I know. They are our ‘friend.’ They let us have a base there so we can fight their enemies. Sheesh, thought we were doing this all wrong for a minute.
Report Post »TheWholeTruth
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:02amTheRealConservative: “Ron Paul only voted in favor of war because he knew his job was in the balance, not to protect the country.”
What RP voted for was the “going after OBL” NOT a WAR. He agreed that OBL was involved and that we should take him out. There was and never has been a Congressional declaration of WAR. It‘s just like the ’war on drugs.’
Report Post »spooner29
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:04amRon Paul threatens to end the free ride that so many Big Gov Liberals and Conservatives enjoy. So what happens, they do anything and everything to smear him and try to stop him from succeeding. Now it seems pretty obvious that this guy has an agenda. He left Ron Paul’s campaign and then tried to run against him and we are supposed to be surprised he is saying negative things about him?
@The Real Conservative…I have never heard or read anywhere where Ron Paul has said any of the things you claim he says or believes. You twist to get a reaction just like all the pundits do. Example: He never said we deserved 9/11 but that’s how everyone made it sound. He simply has enough common sense to understand and realize that if someone says “this is why I have done this to you” then there is a good chance that is the reason. Terrorist after Terrorist have said the reason they attack us is because we are “occupying” their lands and killing there people with bombs intended for our enemies. So when he suggests “blow back” because of that, everyone tries to twist it to make it sound as if he said “Oh we deserved what happened to us”.
So:
Thinks Isreal should not exist *I never heard him say that or have I seen that*
Thinks we shouldn’t have responded to 9/11 *He never said we should not have responded. He has repeatedly said if we are going to deploy our military then we need a Congressional Declaration of War*
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:24amGeorge Washington was a so-called “isolationist”, like Ron Paul.
See here.
Rethinking the Good War
http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance181.html
“The America Founding Fathers, whatever their faults, realized this [that "[t]he history of Europe is the history of war”]. Most educated people are familiar with the “isolationist” sentiments of George Washington in his farewell address:
“The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is, in extending our commercial relations to have with them as little political connection as possible.
“Europe has a set of primary interests which to us have none; or a very remote relation. Hence she must be engaged in frequent controversies, the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns. Hence, therefore, it must be unwise in us to implicate ourselves by artificial ties in the ordinary vicissitudes of her politics, or the ordinary combinations and collisions of her friendships or enmities.”
…
“Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor or caprice?
“It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world.”
Report Post »G.W. Dobbs
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:29amRON PAUL is the ONLY Canidate who is NOT a member of the Council on Foreign Relations or Beholden to major Industries like Big Oil or Pharmaceuticals, or the Military-Industrial Complex. Did you not KNOW that the ELITE would try to destroy his electobility and murder Paul if necessary, as they did Senator Paul Wellstone for speaking out against war. Me, I LOVE RON PAUL IN CHRIST JESUS and believe he is America’s last hope. Anyone else leads to the New World Order.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:58am“He engaged in conspiracy theories including perhaps the attacks were coordinated with the CIA, and that the Bush administration might have known about the attacks ahead of time. He expressed no sympathies whatsoever for those who died on 9/11 …”
Our CIA was involved in ousting a popularly elected Prime Minister for the benefit of a British company that would later be called “BP”. So, they HAVE done some really bad things.
Ron Paul has also been talking about the CIA’s involvement in making money off the war on drugs, for some time.
See here.
Ron Paul calls out the CIA 1988-2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04FuFj6wm8
America, our government CAN, HAS, AND DOES lie to us.
Further proofs are the Gunrunner Scandal and the recent so-called terrorist plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador.
See here.
The Gunwalker Scandal: Overview and Timeline
http://rinosandrats.com/2011/09/the-gunwalker-scandal-overview-timeline/
And here.
Will Holder Fold?
http://lewrockwell.com/kwiatkowski/kwiatkowski277.html
And of course, there’s the links I provided about FDR and his provocation of the attacks on Pearl Harbor.
These are the kinds of things that make Ron Paul not be too quick to ignore claims that 9/11 may have been blowback – which is not to say that innocent civilians deserved to die, he’s not saying that.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 12:14pm(Repost)
“He engaged in conspiracy theories including perhaps the attacks were coordinated with the CIA, and that the Bush administration might have known about the attacks ahead of time. He expressed no sympathies whatsoever for those who died on 9/11 …”
Our CIA was involved in ousting a popularly elected Prime Minister for the benefit of a British company that would later be called “BP”. So, they HAVE done some really bad things.
Ron Paul has also been talking about the CIA’s involvement in making money off the war on drugs, for some time.
See here.
Ron Paul calls out the CIA 1988-2010
http ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04FuFj6wm8
America, our government CAN, HAS, AND DOES lie to us.
Further proofs are the Gunrunner Scandal and the recent so-called terrorist plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador.
See here.
The Gunwalker Scandal: Overview and Timeline
http ://rinosandrats.com/2011/09/the-gunwalker-scandal-overview-timeline/
And here.
Will Holder Fold?
http ://lewrockwell.com/kwiatkowski/kwiatkowski277.html
And of course, there’s the links I provided about FDR and his provocation of the attacks on Pearl Harbor.
These are the kinds of things that make Ron Paul not be too quick to ignore claims that 9/11 may have been blowback – which is not to say that innocent civilians deserved to die, he’s not saying that.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 12:16pmVery Simply…A VOTE FOR RON PAUL IS A VOTE FOR OBAMA’S RE-ELECTION. If you want another four years of Obama..vote for Ron Paul.
Report Post »PJL
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 12:17pmWith Ron Paul’s foreign policy thinking, we would all be speaking German or Japanese now or in the future Arabic.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 12:38pm“However, Dondero makes “one caveat,“ stating that Paul is ”out of touch,” with both Hispanic and Black culture:
““He is completely clueless when it comes to Hispanic and Black culture, particularly Mexican-American culture.”
No, he’s not clueless – he’s indifferent. The reason is that in order to concede that there even IS such a thing as a “black culture” or “mexican culture”, you have to claim that it is legitimate to base a culture on color or ancestry – but this would be a racist position.
To Ron Paul, there is NO SUCH THING as a “black culture” or a “mexican culture”. You likely share common ancestry with those in the culture of your choosing, but your color or ancestry doesn’t COMPEL you to remain in said culture.
Further, consider this man’s perspective.
See here.
A black man’s view on Ron Paul being racist Part 1
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6sYZxZi4qQ
G man
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 12:48pmAnyone but Obama or Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »rs9
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:01pmI want to know only one thing from Pauly girl. What will you do as president if Iran sneaks a nuke into one of our ports in a container and sets it off? Is he going to blame us or retaliate? What? can you answer that cause I have never heard his answer to this question.
Report Post »jgsr
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:08pm“…We allied with someone far worse than Hitler (Stalin) to defeat Hitler.” The best thing about winning wars is that the winners get to write the war history.
Report Post »Stalin was responsible for at least 30 million more deaths than Hitler…..and he was our “partner”…our ally….at the end of WW11, Hitler was done killing….not so with Stalin.
An analogy would be to give total immunity to prosecution, and hundreds of millions of dollars to Jeffrey Dammer to catch a lesser serial killer.
Tigan
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:15pmAmen! Almost everyone I know is voting for Ron Paul no matter how much the Liberal media or “the Blaze” bash him.
Where is “the Blaze”s’ bashing of Bachman? Oh yeah, I forgot, “The Blaze” is run by the minions of Glenn Beck and he has endorsed Bachman so don’r expect “fair” reporting about Ron Paul here.
Report Post »TheTrumanShow
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:27pmI’m appalled and perplexed. The real story here is The Blaze itself and their not-so-subtle-anymore disinformation campaign. They have revealed themselves bare – no better than MSNBC when it comes to Ron Paul. LOOK at the title they use based on hearsay from an unknown person that was somehow involved with him. Reasonable and truthful? No way!
Anyone that has personally investigated Ron Paul as I did myself — which caused me to rethink my positions — knows that this story doesn’t make sense. Notice how the story teller gives a little positive information about Ron Paul first, to create an atmosphere of fairness, before he sticks the knife in.
In the past, I too believed in a strong offensive approach after 9-11 because I listened to the MSM manipulators. But I was wrong and the last 10 years is the proof. Everything is worse and the country is on the cusp of collapse. Ron Paul understands principles and that when they’re violated, whether by a person or a country, destruction follows. History teaches us this lesson over and over.
The Constitution holds our guiding principles and our leaders need to rediscover them. That is Ron Paul’s message.
To those of you still not sure about Ron Paul, please look into it yourself. As GB always said, go to the original source material. You’re being manipulated with stories like this. If you value your kid’s freedom take the time to learn the truth. I’m glad I did.
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »mzk1
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:29pmWow! You guys really do worship Paul. I wish my faith in God was as strong as yours in Paul.
If Paul was recorded planning the attack on the towers with bin Laden, you guys would still find a way to back him.
Report Post »Ronsgym
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:35pmyou have lost your mind,,ron paul is a loose cannon. He acts like a satanist to me
Report Post »Thomas Paine
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:38pmPaul voted to continue sending OUR money to HAMAS/Fatah/Hezbollah terrorists (our ENEMIES) via their money launderers in the Palestinian Authority (SEE: House Resolution 268.) So much for his claim to be a “non-interventionist” or opponent of foreign aid. I can think of no worse INTERVENTIONISTS than islam/shari’a. Paul likes to pretend that the U.S. itself is not “occupied” by our enemies (mosques = islam/shari’a FORTS! & front groups like CAIR) & blames terrorism on US!?
You still want to vote for him ?
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:46pmRS9, What if? What if? What if? What if Russia or China or North Korea or Pakistan or any other country did that? For one thing, it would be difficult for any country to do that if we had our country shored up like it should be. I can tell you, if Iran did such a thing and it was proven, Paul would go to Congress with the proof, Congress would declare war and Paul would go after Iran with everything we have. He is not weak on defense like the Progressives want you to believe. He is not against going to war if it is justified and determined by CONGRESS to go to war. He just wants to do things according to the Constitution, which all TRUE Americans would agree to.
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:52pmNo, you Red Shield Rothschild bootlicker.
We know the CIA created and runs Al Qaeda.
We don’t care what you say about Dr. Paul. We’re voting for him anyway.
Ron Paul 2012.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:54pm@rs9,
“I want to know only one thing from Pauly girl. What will you do as president if Iran sneaks a nuke into one of our ports in a container and sets it off?”
The same thing he said he’d do after 9/11: Grant a Letter of Marque and Reprisal, as per our Constitution.
See here.
Ron Paul on “Letters of Marque and Reprisal”
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSP9NteApqI
CHEECHO
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 2:04pmUnfortunately Ron Paul will not become president for the very reasons he should be – he will not bow to become a puppet as all other heads of state are, he calls people out with Truth, and he demands consequences for choices. It’s too bad. Americans need to get their heads out of their arse and realize they are being raped into oblivion by a handful of puppet-masters.
Report Post »KennethH
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 2:15pmwell yes indeed, I actually think he might be the right guy for office now that I see this.
Report Post »So he’s unconfortable around gays, most straight guys are, without necessarily discriminating. It doesn’t mean a thing. If you can’t speak spanish you are not going to like it if people speak it around you. it is just common courtesy!
Seriously, before Israel became a state as such, there was no conflict over there! jews, christians and muslims were actually living quite happily side by side in that ancient land. the European jews that were shipped over there in the 40s and 50s should have ben given a piece of Germany, ie. those who caused the whole issue, not the land of innocent people who had nothing to do with WWII. Of course it is a struggle for land and resources but it technically is still Palestine. Yet another mistake the Brits did, which was ratified by our knuckleheads in the Whitehouse.
TheTrumanShow
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 2:23pm@CHEECHO
“…..realize they are being raped into oblivion by a handful of puppet-masters.”
Yes, indeed. Thankfully, I‘m awake now after pulling my head ’out’ about a year ago.
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »Freedom now or NEVER
Spyder
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 2:32pmRon Paul 2012!!
Report Post »bear14624
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 2:55pmAllow me to pose a thought for you to ponder, With Paul’s Mentality on foreign policy( he is a unmistakable isolationist) Where would America be right now IF we hadn’t fought the German aggression, IF Paul was in the oval office during the Cuban missile Crisis and/ or hadn’t Reagan won the election and Paul did instead, what would have become of the American hostages in Iran. And even now he believes that we shouldn’t be flying drones over Iran to spy on their Nuclear weapons Program. What would he do, wait until NORAD Cried out “INCOMING”. Iran has made the threat to Nuke us already and sees the USA as week right now under Obama, and they are right.
One thing history has taught us is that to ensure our peace it takes a STRONG NATIONAL SECURITY/Military etc. People who insist on voting for Paul, are voting to seriously risk our peace and national security in the very least. I, for one,like many others, are not willing to trade off our national Security for perhaps a balanced budget, nor are we willing to continue with Obama’s out of control spending spree. That leaves Obama and Paul of the same status in our minds “NON CONTENDERS”
Report Post »FreeUsAll
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 3:00pmLol. It is good to see them attack Dr. Paul, though. It is not because I want to see him attacked, but rather that the MSM and others attack what they fear. They fear anyone who may be threatening their comfort zone. Dr. Paul’s beginning to be recognized as a truly formidable opponent – they are taking him seriously.
Ron Paul 2012!
Report Post »beckit
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 3:04pmWell said.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 3:08pm@KennethH,
“Of course it is a struggle for land and resources but it technically is still Palestine. Yet another mistake the Brits did, which was ratified by our knuckleheads in the Whitehouse.”
For the record, while I do not agree that the UN should have been involved in the recognition of the Jewish state, I do believe that the land of Israel belongs to the Jews.
Having said that, and like I said above, America, as a nation, does not have a responsibility to Israel.
Report Post »Blight14
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 3:35pmHe IS the only choice, GO RON PAUL!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »Nickachick
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 3:41pmI don‘t think I could vote for someone who sides with Islamists in thinking that Israel shouldn’t exist Also, what’s up with thinking Bush would arrange 9-11? Yikes, isn’t it obvious how crazy that sounds that a candidate would believe those things?
Report Post »Mad Mike
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 3:43pmIf these allegations are true I would point out to RP that (1) Japan attacked us and (2) Germany declared war on us unilaterally after the Japanese sneak attack. Sounds like justified self defense to me and our entry to WWII was a declared war, which is one of RP’s main objections to our current “wars of intervention and adventure.” Much of what RP says makes sense at some level but then he says things like this which make you question the very foundation of his sanity.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 3:59pmMad Mike, If you were to research Paul instead of listening to the establishment media, you would understand that Paul would have gone to war with everything we have since Congress declared war at that time. He is just opposed to a President taking matters into their own hands to declare a police action all over the world. If a country is a credible threat to us, he would put that threat to Congress. Congress looks at the threat and votes, according to their constituents, to declare war. That is the people making the decision, not one person. Once Congress declares war, Paul would go in with everything we have, get the job done as quickly as possible, then leave with no nation building. The Constitution. No more going into conflicts just because the U.N. says so. The U.S. out of the U.N. and the U.N. out of the U.S. Ron Paul 2012.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 4:41pm@Mad Mike,
“(1) Japan attacked us and (2) Germany declared war on us unilaterally after the Japanese sneak attack.”
It wasn’t a sneak attack. FDR provoked it IN ORDER TO trick America into war.
See here.
Did FDR Provoke Pearl Harbor?
http://lewrockwell.com/buchanan/buchanan198.html
And here.
Rethinking the Good War
Report Post »http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance181.html
flntlok1949
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 5:06pmRight on! I don’t care if the Man personally hated my Grandmother 20 years ago! It’s what he plans too do if elected that I support – and I’ll gladly sit down with Him and, over a cold beer, discuss his views of my Grandmother’s shortcomings! We won’t have an America, if we don’t dump this Socialist progressive agenda, get back TO America! I’m only hearing that from Dr. Paul!
Report Post »Jim AZ
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 7:32pmThe Daily Caller does a great job of covering both sides of this issue.
Report Post »Evidence for me, leads to Ron’s Side. Check it out for yourself.
http://dailycaller.com/2011/12/26/the-ron-paul-newsletter-controversy-is-a-textbook-liberal-smear-campaign/
Link to the opposing article is at the top of this one.
blondenblueeyed
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:41pmYeah and will leave your sorry butt if you were in a fight for your life all the while saying “it’s none of my business!” He’s no friend. He’s an isolationalist and not getting our vote.
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on December 28, 2011 at 12:35amI think we spend way too much time discussing Ron Paul. There is NO WAY he can beat Obama so he‘s automatically off the list of ’possibles’.
Report Post »Ron Paul should drop out right after South Carolina and put his support behind one of the others left standing.
Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 28, 2011 at 1:06am@PatriotDave
You are actually wrong.
Ron Paul is opposite of Obama so unless you are saying Americans want someone more like Obama, Ron Paul is pretty much the only one who can beat Obama.
Newt, Romney, and Obama have a lot in common. They may disagree on say where/how much to spend or where/how to intervene with war but all are for more spending and more intervention.
All 3 supported individual mandates.
All 3 supported cap n trade
All 3 support foreign aid (redistribution of wealth internationally)
All 3 support the UN
All 3 support socialistic domestic policies
All 3 are elitists
All 3 supported bailouts
All 3 support defending Muslim tyrant Saudi Arabia
All 3 support the patriot act and detention of US citizens
All 3 are backed by wall street
All 3 support bigger Government
All want to tell Israel what to do
All 3 are Progressive
Ron Paul does not support any of those and that is the reason they hate Ron Paul. Ron Paul stands against everything the progressives want.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 28, 2011 at 1:59am@PatriotDave
Is it anti-Semitic to send tax dollars to Muslim countries who hate Israel?
By arming Muslim Nations who hate Israel aren‘t those supporting such actions actually saying Israel shouldn’t exist?
If you want to send money to Israel’s enemies, you are against Israel. If you arm Israeli’s enemies with state of the art weapons you are enabling the attempt to eliminate Israel.
All those calling for aid to Muslim Nations, Bachmann, Santorum, Newt, Romney, are anti-Semitic and basically enabling Muslims to destroy Israel by arming those Muslim Nations.
Progressives have always been and will always be the true racists and anti-Semites. Their ACTIONS not words will show that true every time.
Ron Paul is the anti-Progressive candidate. All the rest have a lot in common with Obama. So much so that more will vote for the current president over a new candidate holding similar views.
You want to beat Obama, vote Ron Paul. It’s the only way.
Report Post »Jaycen
Posted on December 28, 2011 at 2:18amAs I’ve said many times, Ron Paul’s view of foriegn policy is the Progressive view. That nonsense about WWII being the result of Wilson’s failed policies is common from Progressives.
Just because he’s not openly anti-Semetic, doesn‘t mean he’s not a bigot.
Let’s see…Progressive view of the world, check.
Disdain for Jews, check.
Unwilling to support the only other country in the world closely aligned with our capitalist system, check.
Yeah…not voting for this guy. He’s a Progressive.
Report Post »caucasiannation
Posted on December 28, 2011 at 2:22amOnly because the average american is about as well informed as the average earth worm. After reading all of that he sounds like the man for the job.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 28, 2011 at 2:46am@Jaycen
Hahahahahahaha….Ron Paul is no Progressive and you know he is not. But since you need help understanding what progressive is, I’ll draw you a picture surely you could understand.
Total==============================================Anarchy
Gov ^ ^
Constitution
Intervention Non-Intervention
See how far to the LEFT Intervention is and how far PROGRESSED to total Government it is…It is more LIBERAL to intervene than not too!
Wilson was a progressive and supported intervention.
Bush is a progressive and supported intervention.
Obama is a progressive and supports intervention.
Progressive support intervention.
It is clear you are either a blatant liar or ignorant. You pick.
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on December 28, 2011 at 10:14amThink for yourselves people, don’t let the progressive smear tactics, based on Saul Alinsky’s philosophy, determine who you vote for.
They are running SCARED now, thinking they won’t pull off their NWO if Paul gets in. And they are right. He is the only one who will END THE FED and that’s why we see the old “racist” ploy being used by BOTH SIDES now. ROFL. Sure they wait until he’s a Presidential threat to unveil this well kept secret. Kiss my ________ progressives we are on to you.
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on December 28, 2011 at 10:20amLies are still lies, no matter if the left or right spouts them. These planted lies were only there to serve one purpose, to ignite the controversy that would keep the only constitutionalist and anti FED president from becoming a possibility.
Paul is NOT racist this is just a brazen and bold effort.
Beware how you are so easily misled into ruining a man’s reputation, and know that every idle word will have a consequence in the day of judgment. Bearing false witness is STILL against the Ten Commandments, you know.
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on December 28, 2011 at 10:20amIs the number one objective of the Blaze to smear Dr. Paul? I’ve not seen the first negative article on Mitt Romney in over a year! Not the first. Simply disgusting.
As far as the alleged comment, I hope he did say it because he would have been correct. Pat Buchannon wrote a book a year or two agon called Churchill, Hilter and the Unnecessary War. Absoultey eye opening when you put everything into perspective. Bottom line is we had no business in WW2 or WW1.. Maybe WW2 but we should have been destroying the Marxists not the Germans. All trumped up propaganda by special interests and the War machine.
Back to WW2. So we went in to save Poland eh? How did that work out for Poland? We went in because Germany was belligerent eh? What of the Russian belligerance? We went in because of Pearl Harbor? So why were we aiding and arming the allies for years in advance which is in itself an act of War..
No the bottom line is we went to War because the German people dared to think that they could rule their own country and that it would be a country of Germans… We didn’t go to War when the Marxist were slaughtering their citizens by the millions.. It did not matter but it did matter that there existed a perception that Jews weren’t getting a fair shake in Germany.. That’s obviously worth the death of 25-35 million people.
Report Post »AquaBuddha
Posted on December 28, 2011 at 11:34amRon Paul is nut’s PERIOD
Report Post »Just think of the comedy if this guy actually was the nominee
LibsFIB
Posted on December 28, 2011 at 11:42amThe U.S.government is supposed to be a system of checks and balances. Just like obama didnt get us out of the middle east promptly. Neither will President Ron Paul be able to forget our Allies. Smear him all you(themedia) want, he IS the best thing we got until Clark Kent comes along… LibsFIB! RON PAUL 2012!!!!
Report Post »Pendragon
Posted on December 28, 2011 at 12:05pmHere is the Deceleration of War for Afghanistan http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=107_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ040.107 look pretty Clear to me House Senate and President all signed it
Report Post »ooooonooooo
Posted on December 28, 2011 at 12:19pmwe all must wake up…here is an award winning video that does a great job on the obama presidency, please share with all your friends if you enjoy, thank you
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6hvmWDYiCY
LittleBigMouth
Posted on December 28, 2011 at 12:55pmI’m with you brother… PS: as soon as you here the crap about “We don‘t like Ron’s foreign policy”
Report Post »you know the person saying it has been taken in. This is the line the media has been told to use as a
Republican sound bite to dump Ron Paul… it ain’t working. I’m done providing cash for the rest of the world to use… The rest of the world can go to China and get their own money.
Trading_barracuda
Posted on December 28, 2011 at 3:22pmRon Paul is already beating Obama out in Iowa!
–Ron Paul has drawn more Democrats, Independents and Libertarians to support him than all of the other staus quo candidates COMBINED!
–Real Clear Politics just announced it!
–WE NEED TO BEAT OBAMA!
I’m glad there are enough patriots out in Iowa to campaign for real conservative change in America!
–RON PAUL IS BEATING OBAMA!
Report Post »mauijonny
Posted on December 28, 2011 at 4:13pmFor all of you who think you know something about WWII allies: The United States didn’t get involved with WWII (because we were isolationists – just like Ron Paul) until Pearl Harbor. We then went after the Germans because they were allied with Japan (Germany wanted access to their navy). Stalin, at that time, also wanted Hitler destroyed (Hitler was heading their way). THAT‘S why we got into WWII and THAT’S why we allied with Russia. Had we not been isolationists (like Ron Paul), then we may have been able to avoid the whole, bloddy thing. DON’T VOTE RON PAUL 20EVER!!!!
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on December 28, 2011 at 11:10pm@mauijonny,
“For all of you who think you know something about WWII allies: The United States didn’t get involved with WWII (because we were isolationists – just like Ron Paul) until Pearl Harbor.”
Ron Paul isn’t an isolationist, he’s a non-interventionist – like George Washington.
See here.
Rethinking the Good War
http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance181.html
“The America Founding Fathers, whatever their faults, realized this (that “[t]he history of Europe is the history of war”). Most educated people are familiar with the “isolationist” sentiments of George Washington in his farewell address:
“The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is, in extending our commercial relations to have with them as little political connection as possible.”
…
“Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor or caprice?
“It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world.”
“We then went after the Germans because they were allied with Japan (Germany wanted access to their navy).”
Japan attacked us because FDR deliberately provoked them in order to trick the US into war.
See here.
Did FDR Provoke Pearl Harbor?
Report Post »http://lewrockwell.com/buchanan/buchanan198.html
Vechorik
Posted on December 29, 2011 at 11:45amEveryone wants an explanation of Ron Paul’s newsletters? Well here it is:
Honesty and Compassion
http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-washington-dc/checkmate-video
The post someone made beneath the video:
Report Post »“Robert J. Fürterer · Subscribe
I never forget about this awesome doctor in 1984 during I was senior in high school when my ex-wife was junior that hospital would not take new patient w medicaid so he was told about us so he was willing to take it, delivered my daughter and pick the tab and told us to stay in school and finish in which we did. I got award and scholar from him during my graduation day. I went to college w the scholar of my major as electronic technology level 1 and 2. I thanked him for taking care of problem. He s my man w/ my heart. Go Dr. Ron Paul 2012 Go:)”
MeteoricLimbo
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:29pmI wonder if “Ex” is the operative word here.
Report Post »Delta D-5-3
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:47pmYep, “Dr”. Paul has very EXTREME views, way beyond norms. When you get staffers saying it, what more proof do you want Paulheads?? The guys got more then a few screws loose, and they CAN’T hide it anymore……….
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:49pmThis story is just like the rest of them. Lets wait for the truth to come out. Just like the girl crying
She is a busy little bee, lets see what she has been up to shall we. A Perry supporter for one.
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/emily-schrader/21/93b/6b8
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:56pmThis is the Girl crying over the book.
Emily Schrader’s Experience
California State Chair Students for Rick Perry
June 2011 – Present (7 months)
Assistant Development Director StandWithUs Nonprofit; 51-200 employees; Nonprofit Organization Management industry
January 2011 – Present (1 year) Greater Los Angeles Area
Chief of Staff USC College Republicans
2011 – 2011 (less than a year)
Intern U.S. Congressman Dana Rohrabacher
May 2011 – August 2011 (4 months)
Deputy Los Angeles Regional Vice Chair California College Republicans Nonprofit; 11-50 employees; Political Organization industry
2010 – 2011 (1 year)
USC President Christians United For Israel Nonprofit; 51-200 employees; Public Relations and Communications industry
2010 – 2011 (1 year)
Communications Director Students For Carly, Carly Fiorina for U.S. Senate
June 2010 – November 2010 (6 months)
Los Angeles Regional Chair Students for Meg, Meg Whitman for Governor 2010 Government Agency; 501-1000 employees; Political Organization industry
May 2010 – November 2010 (7 months)
Intern Office of US Senator Wayne Allard
June 2007 – August 2008 (1 year 3 months)
Emily Schrader’s Education
University of Southern California Political Science
2008 – 2012 (expected)
Activities and Societies: Christians United For Israel, College Republicans, Trojans For Israel
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:58pmWe allied with Stalin , who murdered 20million , check
Report Post »We allied with Saddam Hussein , check
We allied with ho chi min , check
We allied with Osama bin Laden against the soviets, check
And we wonder why the world hates our Federal Criminal govt,
Which, by the way will be coming after us next…..check mate !!!
Detroit paperboy
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 12:19amEric Dondero, is now claiming he was hit on by Herman Cain …
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 12:23amPaperboy
Report Post »Look at the darn post above!
RepubliCorp
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 12:52amRon Paul Meets the Student Scholars for 9/11 Truth
Report Post »http://www.myspace.com/video/peace-freedom-are-achieved-through-understanding/ron-paul-meets-the-student-scholars-for-9-11-truth/28483925
MEANS2RESIST
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 2:23amBAM!!!! TULSAYEEHAW you nailed it with those historical facts…..REALCONSERV……I think TULSA has got you by the balls mate……and the US & Britain knew NOTHING of Hitlers final solution for the jews until our troops began discovering the death camps…..
Report Post »macpappy
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:46amyadayadaneocon
Report Post »It’s a bitch when you go to so much trouble to smear someone and no one cares to read your rant; isn’t it.
West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 3:04pmSome people just listen to the establishment, through the bought and paid for media, and just throw their talking points out. The establishment is afraid of Paul being elected as he would try to strip their power over the people and give that power back to the people. Those who do not understand this are still following the powers at large blindly and not thinking on their own. Research people. Look at Pauls voting record over the years and you will see that he follows the principles set down by our Founding Fathers in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Does it not concern anyone that there has been only two families (both Progressives) that have been in Washington at the highest levels of power for over three decades? GHW Bush;1980-1992, VP and President, Bill Clinton; 1992-2000, President, GW Bush; 2000-2008, President, Hillary Clinton; 2008-Present, Sec of State. Now many people just want to put their friends into the same high positions? I think we need real change for America and Dr. Paul would bring that change and give us back the liberties we have lost over many decades.
Report Post »Ron Paul 2012.
techengineer11
Posted on December 28, 2011 at 10:26amDetroit paperboy
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:58pm
We allied with Stalin , who murdered 20million , check
We allied with Saddam Hussein , check
We allied with ho chi min , check
We allied with Osama bin Laden against the soviets, check
And we wonder why the world hates our Federal Criminal govt,
Which, by the way will be coming after us next…..check mate !!!
Do you not find it rather mind boggling that the average Blaze reader and conservative on this site can’t see the hypocrisy and the inconsistencies?
Report Post »tzion
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:26pmHonestly little here surprises me, not even the WWII bit. Paul always came across as an isolationist to the extreme. That’s not a bad thing per say but many Americans may not agree with that approach, myself included. Washington‘s advice was intended to prevent us from sticking our noses in other people’s internal problems (i.e. Libya). The idea that someone like Hitler may come to power never occurred to our founders. America‘s involvement in WWII wasn’t about being for Britain or for the Jews, it was about being against Hitler and his evil. Uniting against a common evil isn’t the same as getting involved in foreign politics. If their was a war America shouldn’t have entered, it’s WWI, a war fought by imperialist nations who suddenly found the world to be too small. The battle lines had been drawn before the war ever started.
Report Post »Dumbwhiteguy
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:09pmIf I had to choose, I’m not real thrilled with the international left. I don’t expect us to be part of the agenda 21, to worry about.
Report Post »TulsaYeeHaw
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:25pmBy the way, a little wrinkle in the sheets: Germany formally declared war on us first. Our declaration was in response, as congress was leery of fighting 2 enemies at once. We probably would have gone after Germany anyway, but that is how it transpired. All this, even though we were already aiding Stalin, a man who murdered far more than Hitler could have ever dreamed of.
The main differences between Stalin and Hitler were these:
Report Post »Preferences of socialism or communism
The variety of people they had murdered
The “friends” they chose. It so happened that Germany was fighting Britain too, which gave us an interest in aiding the USSR. The USSR would not have beaten back the invasion without our us giving them what we did.
therealconservative
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:36pm@TUL
‘By the way, a little wrinkle in the sheets’ It did matter Ron Paul was still against it.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:03am@neocon
Report Post »I see it, about the girl crying, great research, what did u do ?
Hack into her computer and snatch her resume ? ; )) maybe they should have got her Obamas book….. Wet dreams of my marxist illegal alien Father….
KICKILLEGALSOUT
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:05amUniting against a common evil? And how many warlords and dictators around the world are slaughtering people at the moment. Should we be uniting and getting involved there too, how many countries would that get us involved in, how much would that cost? We can even help our own poor and protect our own borders from foreign invasion and people are worried about half way around the world. The US is the not savior of the world.
Report Post »TheWholeTruth
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:15amYou need another history lesson here. We did not get into WWII because of Hitler. We were staying out of it until Japan hit us. Yes, it‘s been proven that we knew about it before hand because the Pres wanted in but couldn’t get Congress to go along with it. Japan was the deciding factor.
People listen. There are so many false flags that America has flown. Once you start to see how we get ourselves into wars you can’t close your eyes to it anymore. We were hit by terrorist on 9/11 true, but not all of them were Muslim. Some were our own people. Those towers would not come down from plane strikes, they were built to withstand them. Even if the damage from the planes had been enough, the top would have toppled off and the rest would be left standing. OKC was also and inside job. Tell me how debris can fly against a blast to go across the street? Get a copy of A Nobel Lie and watch the FACTS about OKC then watch this: http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/12/08/ca-asset-talks-about-911/ (that’s CIA not CA but hey, they are the one’s that typoed.
Report Post »tzion
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:51pmIt’s one thing when a country commits atrocities within its borders and another when it starts conquering neighbors to spread its evil. WWII prevented and reversed the spread of Hitler‘s evil and then ensured it couldn’t become a threat to the world. And yes, America joined the war in response to Pearl Harbor, but there was little reason to send troops to Europe. That was our choice; we had no obligation. And while we did ally with Stalin, you’ll notice how long that alliance lasted once the war ended and the Cold War began.
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on December 28, 2011 at 10:38amDude on are you on crack? How can anyone even compare Hitler to Stalin or Mao with a straight face? My god are you Jewish? HItler was voted Time man of the year a few years before WW2… lol
Listen to what JFK said about him in 1945. “Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived… He had a mystery about him in the way that he lived and in the manner of his death that will live and grow after him. HE HAD IN HIM THE STUFF OF WHICH LEGENDS ARE MADE.” Now this is what a former President of the USA said.
And to say that our Founders did’t envision evil dictators? When has the world ever existed without evil dictators? Omg you are a nut! And you definitely need a history lesson.
Report Post »1casawizard
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:26pmThis sounds like he said she said. Nothng to it in a court of law. I believe half of what I see, nothing what I hear.
Report Post »ShyLow
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:47pmGod was behind 911 and Pearl Harbor and every other evil act on this planet…He started all the religions…He is the puppet master of puppet masters…He knows your thoughts and actions because he gives them to you…He is in us all doing his will…Gay and straight…Rich and poor…Choice is the greatest illusion…Faith is a tool…it his carrot he uses to lead the faithful…the world is his stage…so know your role jabroni…because God is stone cold and he says so…you are all just part of the big show…the triple H’s heaven hell and heretics
Report Post »Helpful
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:23pmI see the NEWs people all over this trying to dis-credit anyone who could BEAT OBama….This stinks but I’m still backing Ron Paul…………because I don’t believe its True
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 12:02amI bet you didn’t defend Cain …….
Report Post »CptStubbing
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:36amI liked Cain, I thought he was a decent guy and didn’t do any of the things he was accused of. However, after the last woman came out and said they had a 13 year affair, he dropped out. his wife should have come out and said she knew about the relationship and that would have been it. She didn’t do that though. Cain could have gotten past those comments if they weren’t true and his wife knew about it. He wanted to save his family from a continual attack by the media, it was very honorable.
Still, I think it’s funny that people attack Paul for things written in a paper over 20 years ago and what some ex aide spouts off, who verifies Paul isn’t a racist by the way. Then they turn around and support other candidates, who are for racial profiling and like to use the term “tar baby” or their favorite president is the one who imprisoned thousands of Japanese Americans during WWII, or think that poor black kids should clean schools.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 7:12amThere is a pattern …….
Report Post »http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/11/the_ron_paul_campaign_and_its.html
KTsayz
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:37amHAHAHA Republicrap… wassamatta, that the only link you have? Anyway, it’s from American Stinker, a rag outfit if ever there was one. They got all ‘Cained-up’, tons of articles about how great a guy he is and how he’ll be president… YIKES… they were wrong. They are still mourning that he’s gone. What a stupid blog.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:56pmKTSAYZ debunk it……..or shut up
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:21pmIm not a Paul supporter, but i sure wpuld like to hear Romney or anyone for that matter , tell me they will cut ONE TRILLION DOLLARS the first year…. We must stop this Ever growing octopus of a federal Govt. It is strangling us, and im sorry but i kinda get why the rest of the world hates us, this federal govt is exactly what our founders warned us against……i will support our nominee no matter who it is… But Damn people, we’re runnin on empty, and you aint gonna have to worry about a foriegn policy when your in total and complete collapse…..
Report Post »chicago76
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:30pmThey will bleed our country until there is no blood left and leave us to die. Vote Ron Paul or vote for the end of America.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 12:04amYeah…. Pork Paul and his earmarks will save us
Report Post »RightPolitically
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:17pmI believe the guy is telling the truth. Of course Paul‘s staff say he’s lying. Considering the tactics used and opinions offered by the so called “Pauliacs” in his defense, I don’t trust him. I‘d say there are many leftists in Ron Paul’s camp.
Report Post »chicago76
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:22pmWho cares what he says anymore? Wallstreet is our enemy not Ron Paul. They are the ones paying off these moron SOBs. They are the ones who stole trillions of dollars from us and spread it around the world. They are the Saudis, the chinese, the indians, the iranians, the french, the germans and all the other countries that own wallstreet.
Report Post »drago
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:40pm@chicago76
Report Post »Um, its not wall street thats the problem, its the politicians, and it always has been.You blame wall street for taking bail outs, so who gave out them the bail outs , politcians.You blame wall street for paying bribes to politcians, and who accepted those bribes, politcians.So if you’re going to go on a rant and point fingers, point them in the right direction…….
drago
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:42pmOh, and btw, chicago76 is of course, encinom….
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:43pmAgreed, RIGHTPOLITICALLY…All stands to reason.
Report Post »TheBlazes Slanted Agenda
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:14pmWar WAR!!! Nuke them all! Turn the Middle East into a sea of glass and kill all the Muslims!
Whoever survives we’ll convert to Mormonism.
Bush/Cheney 2012
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:30pm@theblazes
I see you join our party today. Just in time to be a Paul Supporter and slame The Blaze, how convenient.
Report Post »The-Real-Enrico
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:34pm@CHICAGO76 Put down the crack pipe.
@RIGHTPOLITICALLY I believe 100% what that man had to say. The thing is who is worse for the country RomNewtey/Obama or Ron Paul. As scary as Paul is I would choose Paul over another progressive RomNewtey and our dictator Obama. I would personally choose Bachman and would every one else would too in a hurry! We don’t have to choose a progressive rhino moderate like Romney/Newt or the scary Paul. We still have a chose and they’re still other candidates. Support with your words, support actions and support with your money.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:45pmI had a disgruntled employee, several years ago, that tried to hurt me with my advertisers, didn’t work. He then went as far as trying to get my teenage son arrested for drug possession, but it failed when he was caught by the police and went to jail himself. We were lucky that an astute citizen saw him breaking into my sons vehicle. Do not discount what a disgruntled employee will stoop to for revenge.
Report Post »Anamah
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 12:05amToo many.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 12:18amWEST COAST PATRIOT don’t be surprised at how low a Neo-Lib will go……… I knew one that made up stories.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 12:50amRepublicorp, Are you trying to say that I would lie and that I am a what? Neo-Lib? You are so idiotic you do not even know what a neo-lib is do you? There is not one ounce of neoconservative in me. I am a conservative Libertarian. People on here are getting wise to Anti-Americans like you. Progressivism is in your blood, not mine. The story above is true, but you would not know truth if it were staring you in the face.
Report Post »theropingeffect
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 4:46amEric Dondero is a commenter on Hit & Run who is considered a conservative troll. Eric Dondero is often faked with strawman comments by other commenters. Wikia
Report Post »chicago76
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:16pmAgain, wallstreet is spending all that money they stole from us like crazy to protect themselves from going to prison with a new president they cannot control. Time to send them all to prison and shut down the anti-American influences from other countries controlling wallstreet.
Report Post »Lazier Than Thou
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:12pmNot a single part of this is surprising. Of course Ron Paul is an isolationist, he wants to close all our foreign bases and withdraw all our troops. He wants to stop sending all foreign aid. He wants the US to keep itself to itself and I, frankly, agree. It’s a matter of timetable, however, as I don’t think we should do all of that in 4 years, probably should spread it out over 20-30 years.
I’ve always suspected that Ron Paul was a Truther, something that I really don’t mind in a person. Family members of mine are Truthers and most Truthers(especially the ones on the right) are Ron Paul supporters. I think he walks right up to the line of declaring himself to be a Truther in his public statements, but doesn’t go too far.
This didn‘t tell me anything I didn’t already suspect.
Report Post »chicago76
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:37pmIf not now then never. There will always be another war. There will always be another oil sheik we have to protect. Listen to your military people. They strongly favor Ron Paul. Listen to your heart not wallstreet. He will stop the decline of our country. We have no money. We are printing trillions of dollars and spreading it all over the world. You can’t just take back that money. Slowly the international banks are bleeding us. They were doing it more slowly before, but like most greed it gets more arrogant as time goes by, and they will bleed us faster and faster. The next step is not less spending, but more spending, lots more, if we keep going the way we are.
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:45pm@ Chigago
The military does not favor Ron Paul, they know what he is a pacifist.
Report Post »Workforit
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:11pmEric Dondero… is a little man, with big ambitions.
Not smart enough himself to create the wealth and fame he so firmly believes he justly deserves…
He has to climb on the back of someone that actually made something of himself and beat away.
How much were you paid Eric for this little “expose”?
Ron Paul 2012!
Report Post »YoungBloodNews
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:25pmEric D. is up to his old games again. He is a former disgruntled employee who tried to run against Paul and failed miserably. I could go on and on about him but do your own research – its all on the net and his false statements have already been debunked (years ago, much like the newsletters)… Slime MSM and BLAZE is getting desperate ;)
Hey BLAZErs, why not google the still frame shot of Dr. Paul supposedly doing the satan salute and run with that one next, you seem to love tabloid level stories.
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:31pm@WORK
“How much were you paid Eric for this little “expose”? Maybe the same as the Cain ‘women’ were paid for their ‘stories’
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:32pm@young
Ron Paul supperters are up to their old game deny, deny, deny
Report Post »Go-rin-no-sho
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:51pm@THEREALCONSERVATIVE
Report Post »Wow, as a former Cain supporter, your statement would reinforce what I believe about the allegations against Herman Cain. That those supporters were part of a backdoor media hit-job, and that you support and believe those who accused him. I’d ultimately decided to give Herman Cain the benefit of the doubt, as I do now, with Paul.
YoungBloodNews
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:57pm@THEREAL
Learn to spell before insulting, you only make yourself look weak…
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:01pm@go
Never said I was a Cain supporter. I just pointed out the hypocrisy of the Paul followers.
Bachmann
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:01pm@thefakeconservativetroll……I’m STILL waiting for just ONE video, ONE recording, ONE speech, ONE anything where Ron Paul is himself advocating for the end of Isreal as a nation….YOU HAVE CLAIMED HE DOES SO SHOW ME THE PROOF, Let the people on the blaze be witness to the facr you will sidestep and point to some clown looking for a job as your proof! tic toc tic toc tic toc…..JUST ONE SPOOKY….JUST ONE!
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:03pm@Young
sorry teacher, but good come back
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:07pm@ truth
Here’s a hint, scroll to the top of the page.
Now, where’s your ONE, JUST ONE proof that’s not from a Ron Paul site. The Blaze is waiting
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:21pm@thefakeconservative
Report Post »You sidestepped my question AGAIN, Why are you so dishonest? I’ve asked you for JUST ONE. Be honest, YOU CAN‘T DO IT BECAUSE YOU DON’T HAVE ANY, Just admit it, instead of carrying on this lying charade.
therealconservative
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:42pm@thetruth
I’ve been sidestepping you? I’m sorry, I mean have that mountain of data you’ve supplied from those non RP sites.
“YOU CAN‘T DO IT BECAUSE YOU DON’T HAVE ANY, Just admit it, instead of carrying on this lying charade.” Words matter
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:52pm@thetruth
BTW I sent you the like to this article a few hours ago. You chose to only read the parts that fit your agenda.
Bachmann
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:54pm@thefakeconservative
Report Post »You’ve proved my point! Your a liar, intelectually dishonest, and you got called on it! I can promise you that TO ANYONE reading ANY OF YOUR posts after outright lying and than ignoring my request for any proof, Will see you for what you exactly are…a NSA spook with the mission of spreading blatant and false accusations against a man that wants to put the MIC on a leash, YOU HAVE BEEN EXPOSED, Now you will simply sidestep my request for proof while repeating my words as if that will fix your dishonesty and complete disregard for the TRUTH.
RepubliCorp
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 12:28amEric Dondero… is a little man, with big ambitions. Just like his boss
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:10pmWhat the heck was Paul doin’ in a Sasha Baron Cohen film? It was called Bruno, I believe. Just saw a clip of it. Creepy!
Report Post »Go-rin-no-sho
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:56pmI contend that as the source of his homophobia.
Report Post »YoungBloodNews
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:04pmWatch the whole movie before commenting, then research how Cohen chooses to film (hell in Borat he scammed Kazakhstan for the film footage) . Paul was sandbagged and thought it was a real interview. What happened to him was rude and uncalled for, regardless of who he is; but hey America loves it’s laughs over principles like respect and tactfulness…
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 12:07amI’m sure Paul made some cash from the movie, no?
Report Post »endgamer
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:09pmHeresay..
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:35pmDon’t remeber you saying that when Cain was accussed
Report Post »rockstone
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:32pmThat’s not really a fair comparison. Paul is a lot of things but…….. he’s not a quitter like that philandering pizza salesman.
Report Post »MrMagoo
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:09pmWow.I still like Ron Paul,just not as a C.in.C.De emergencia el pronto!
Report Post »whatthecrazy
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:05pmI think i may be a mental case by the time Nov 2012 gets here,our choices for GOP suck period……….
Report Post »Californiasodbuster
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:38pmI hear you, i am in the same boat, no one to really grab your inner expectations of who we want to run against poverty lord.
Report Post »I have my choices, but get ridiculed when i mention them.
Lord have mercy on this great country.
snoopydaniels
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:38pmI can’t disagree more. Do you guys remember LAST cycle’s candidates?
Report Post »chewfatlip
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 2:27pmFor me, it’s anybody but Obama AND Paul.
Report Post »If it’s a choice between Obama or Paul, then I go any third party candidate that won’t win to protest.
Californiasodbuster
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 9:59pmI too, am a H omo P hobe, and i also think FDR knew about the bombing of Pearl Harbor before hand.
Report Post »Sorry
paperpushermj
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:39pmDo You Also Think The Moon Is Made of Cheese ?
Report Post »Californiasodbuster
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:54pmNo, moon rocks, and a dark side according to Pink Floyd, you crack me up, thank you.
Report Post »TulsaYeeHaw
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:00pmHAHA
Good one there, Isolate mock and ridicule, but don’t engage further than that.
Stalin knew about Pearl Harbor, but you think FDR didn’t?
Soviet freighters bound from the US with tanks and trunks we were giving to our COMMUNIST worse than hitler ALLIES passed the Japanese task force that bombed Pearl Harbor, but they were ordered by Soviet High Command to maintain strict radio silence until they got home?
Oh, but the moon is made of cheese, that is so funny……….
Report Post »floridacockleburr
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 9:59pmHe sounds credible to me.
Report Post »dealer@678
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:15pmRon Paul gives me the creeps. I said it before but he reminds me of Boris Karloff. I cant get that out of my head
Report Post »Dumbwhiteguy
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:23pmI think we are the end of our rope. Too many people ripping off the system. We have been duped one polotician at a time. We are being hearded into an international system and I think there is any hope. I was reading about progressive’s and a civil libritarian fell under that catagory. Ron Paul said he was a civil libritarian, I think it’s just a matter of time. Next November.
Report Post »MrMagoo
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:06pmBoris Karloff was a great guy,and generous in person.He’s always my favorite Monster,ie: Frankenstein.
Boris Karloff:” My wife has good taste. She has seen very few of my movies.”
Report Post »“When I was nine I played the demon king in Cinderella and it launched me on a long and happy life of being a monster. ”
Boris Karloff (on his appeal to children, who empathized with the monster):” I don’t really scare them any more than do Jungle Jim, Dan Dunn, Tarzan, and the other heroes of the comic sections.”
TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 9:58pmThe microscope is on high-power; and the Ronald is on the slide. This will be interesting. And now, let’s hear from the Paul apologists……
Report Post »chicago76
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:13pmWho believes these Wallstreet suck ups? How much are they paying him? Wallstreet is sure wasting an awful lot of the money we gave them to cover their @sses. They sure want Romney as president to make sure their @sses aren’t thrown in jail. Time to say screw them and vote for who we think is right not who will protect wallstreet @sses.
Report Post »nigh_eve
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 9:58pmEric Dondero really has an axe to grind — not sure exactly what happened to this disgruntled employee, but I have lost any respect for him. Other than Dondero has always supported the war on the middle east, which Paul disagrees with, Dondero has never made it clear why he is disgruntled.
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:17pmI’ve read the article he stood up for Paul on some issues, but told how Paul really feels about others. Most people with an axe to grind say nothing positive. Paul camp said he was fired, denied.
http://rightwingnews.com/election-2012/statement-from-fmr-ron-paul-staffer-on-newsletters-anti-semitism/
Report Post »chicago76
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:28pmWho cares, I have heard enough of this cannibalism by republicans. The Wallstreet bunch is trying to make us cannibalize each other to get rid of the competition for Smitt Romney who they can control. Get smart repubs. It is not each other we need to fight, it is the criminals and foreign nationals controlling wallstreet we need to fight and ron paul will do that for us. If you want your country back and our boys and girls to quit dying all over the world to protect some sheik who thinks your to low to spit on then vote for smitt or newt or obama. Vote for the decline of our great country and loss of freedom. It is sad that our own people reject freedom for slavery to the banks and foreign interests.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:24pmI agree 1000%
Report Post »“The Wallstreet bunch is trying to make us cannibalize each other to get rid of the competition for Smitt Romney who they can control. “
booger71
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 12:06amRon gets Wall street money too
Report Post »asybot12
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:54amHey guys quit using my name (Smitt) in this context I am having enough of a hard time as it is with a quazillion no name candidates right now. There is not one so far that is electable, except for maybe ,as far as as an Canadian citizen looking from the outside in, is R. Santorum he has experience as a House rep and a Senator and Mayor so at least he knows all levels of government. thanks
Report Post »Drakkhanlord
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 9:57pm“” That said, Dondero’s claims should be taken with a grain of salt.
Paul campaign manager Jesse Benton emailed The Weekly Standard Sunday afternoon in regards to Dondero’s latest statement:
“Eric Dondero is a disgruntled former staffer who was fired for performance issues. He has zero credibility and should not be taken seriously.”
Pretty dam lame Blaze…
Report Post »justangry
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:32pmI’m sure GB has the means to ask this guy to come on GBTV and take a lie detector test.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:26pmWhy doesn’t Glenn Beck get Dr. Paul on himself? They need to talk DETAILS of what they disagree about Israel. It’s never been clearly stated. Like “if this happens” or “that happens” What would you do and what would Glenn do differently?
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:36pmVechorik
Take a look at this, does it remind you of the crying girl?
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/emily-schrader/21/93b/6b8
Report Post »mrsalvage2
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 2:12amWhat an idea! Why not have Ron Paul on? Why not ask him directly?
Oh that would require…..Journalism!
Report Post »semihardrock
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 9:55pmSounds like a “white” Obama!
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on December 28, 2011 at 9:34amFar from it.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 9:53pmI just found another shocker that Iowans might like to know about before they vote!
A recording of Ron Paul saying that homosexuality is not a sin and that God is wrong about it being a sin. Listen to the audio in the link.
Dated Dec. 27,…..tomorrow;
http://patriotstatesman.com/2011/06/ron-pauls-homosexual-surprise-causes-exodus-of-faithful-followers-of-christ/
Report Post »dealer@678
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:04pmGod said it was sin, then its sin
Report Post »nigh_eve
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:06pmIf you think that is the greatest issue concerning America right now — you should vote for Santorum — He will lay down the law on that. If you think American sovereignty is slipping away then you explore candidates other than Gingrich, Romney, Perry or Bachmann.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:19pmI guess the Ronald can take that up with God when he has some time; after he is asked to leave the stage of nominees. Geez, he really is out there.
Report Post »endgamer
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:20pmHe said nothing wrong.. It was Ron’s interpretation of the Bible. The John Lofton was VERY judgmental. John Lofton and people like him keep me from the church. Mr. Lofton has NO right to pass judgement.
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:10pm@Endgamer
We shouldn’t have gone after Hitler, yep nothing wrong there.
Report Post »Jeff65
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 5:30am@RepubliCorp
I wouldn’t go to a church that with a preacher that had that view, but Ron Paul’s stance on how to treat the situation of gay rights is appropriate (I don’t think any level of government should deal with marriage of any sort), so it doesn’t really matter that he is wrong in his biblical view of gays. It would be ideal if he had a “perfect” understanding of, and dedication to the bible, but is that what ANYONE is looking for?
You are really grasping at straws.
I like the other video link that you posted, that shows Ron Paul thinks that the government sometimes does cover-ups in it’s investigations. That is so shocking!
Report Post »Jeff65
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 5:36amSorry, RepubliCorp, Rational Man. It looks like I got the two of you mixed up with the above post. I wounder why?
The gay issue was for Rational Man.
Report Post »The investigation cover-up issue was for RepubliCorp.
RepubliCorp
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 2:07pmJEFF65…. Thats okay.
Report Post »mike1127
Posted on December 28, 2011 at 12:14amAnyone that allows “god” to influence their politics is too crazy to vote for. Ron Paul would be perfect if he were an anti-theist.
Report Post »Vunks
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 9:53pmSo blaze how does it feel to post this garbage, but he is not a threat right LOL.
Report Post »Nobar
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 9:52pmCue the Paul-bots in 3..2..
But in all seriousness, this should scare any sane person away from RP. Santorum 2012
Report Post »chicago76
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:18pmWho is Santorum? He sounds like any other warhawk neocon to me. Lets kill everyone we don’t like right.
Report Post »spiritsmonger
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 11:43pmNo, this has only cost the Republicans the election. I will still vote Ron Paul. If he is not the nominee, I will vote for Obama, to spite you and the rest of the sheeple who are voting for the statist quo. You want to continue the bailouts, the stimulus, the deficits. Fine. But you will do it with Obama.
Report Post »asybot12
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 2:10amDoes any here really know what the word neocon means any more?? And when and how it became into being??? check a word out before you use it!
Report Post »BornJewishMuslimByFaith
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 9:51pmI do not know much about Ron Paul. What I think is that this individual is a type of outcast politician; even for the conservatives. Which is why he has support by many different people.
Report Post »dealer@678
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 9:48pmWhats wrong with Santorum. I dont understand
Report Post »dealer@678
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 9:57pmOf all the candidates Santorum is the only one i fully trust. Why cant anyone else see it
Report Post »nigh_eve
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:02pmHere‘s what’s wrong with Santorum and ALL the other “pro-life“ ”constitutionalists”… they think that unalienable rights (given by Our Creator) only apply to Americans. Ron Paul is Pro Life regardless of the color of your skin or the religions of your ancestors, because these rights are “unalienable — given by Our Creator”
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:04pmHe may come out smelling like a rose, after they do some more weeding of the garden.
Report Post »Californiasodbuster
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:06pmI like Rick.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:10pmYep, Santorum is my first pick.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:21pm@nigh_eve
Just keep posting…..PLEASE!!!
That is the dumbest post I have seen from a Paulistinian yet. And thats really saying something!!
Report Post »Paul supporters are Paul’s worst enemy………Keep it up!
RightThinking1
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 10:49pm@Dealer
Report Post »Yes, I like Santorum also. I do wish he had more executive experience, and I wish he was a vet, but that would be true of any of the others now that Perry seems to have stalled. I weary of the Paulies, they genuinely believe that we can adopt an isolationist stance, and still be secure and meaningful in the world. One thing is for sure, the next president is going to have a real mess on his hands. I could probably settle for a Romney/Santorum ticket, though not happily.
Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 12:10amRick Santorum who loved to spend money and never voted no on a spending bill?
Rick who wants war and to police the world?
You all do know spending means more taxes right?
Rick Santorum blows….He is progressive in fiscal policies (spending) and he is progressive in foreign policy (intervention). No way I‘d vote for Rick Santorum and I’m unsure why any of you would like the guy? Isn’t Rick Santorum more of Bush and Obama?
Obama and Bush were the same and Rick Santorum is just like them. He may spend money on different issue or go to war with different nations and for different reasons but it’s still more spending and more wars. Something as we have had for quite some time.
Rick wants to send our tax dollars to Pakistan and other Muslim nations. Pakistan didn’t even tell us bin Laden was there and we are aiding MUSLIM nations. Nations that hate Israel. Why does Rick want to send money to those who hate Israel? Is that redistribution of wealth and hurting Israel? YES!
P.S. We are broke and I’m TEA! Rick Santorum sucks!
Report Post »GeorgieJo
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 12:31amI like Rick Santorum BUT have decided NOT to vote.
Obummer has the unions (SEIU/ACORN) the Black Panthers,the academic progressives and all the plantation folks plus the main SLIME MEDIA/GE-Immelt and all the latino (Gloria Estefan anybody?) vote NOT to mention the Hollyweirdos—Speilberg/Hanks/Weinstein/Streisand and then all the NBA….throw in all the rappers and NO Republican candidate has a chance in _____.
God help this country from this socialist who cares zero about the US of A.
When Iraq fragments into 3 countrys–civil war will begin and the EU will collapse.
We only have ourselves to blame. TERM LIMITS would have helped.
Report Post »Too late. This country is on life support and ventilators are NOT covered under Obummercare.
Twobyfour
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 1:42amnigh_eve, that‘s in a direct contradiction with RP’s isolationist an non-interventionist stance. You can’t reconcile these concepts (except for liberals that suffer from a cognitive dissonance and are able to held entirely contradictory concepts in their “minds” at the same time). Riddle me that.
Report Post »asybot12
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 2:11amSantorum!
Report Post »Love_John_Galt
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 7:29amI think Santorum is a good person… but he’s still BIG government. He wants to legislate morality and police the world – neither can be done successfully.
Report Post »sawbuck
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 7:34amHere’s what wrong with Ron Paul.
HON. RONPAUL OF TEXAS IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Thursday, May 2, 2002 Mr. PAUL . Mr. Speaker, this legislation could not have come at a worse time in the ongoing Middle East crisis. Just when we have seen some positive signs that the two sides may return to negotiations toward a peaceful settlement, Congress has jumped into the fray on one side of the conflict. I do not believe that this body wishes to de-rail the slight progress that seems to have come from the Administration’s more even-handed approach over the past several days. So why is it that we are here today ready to pass legislation that clearly and openly favors one side in the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict?
. Many people of various religious backgrounds seem determined to portray what is happening in the Middle East as some kind of historic/religious struggle, where one side is pre-ordained to triumph and destroy the other. Even some in this body have embraced this notion. Surely the religious component that some interject into the conflict rouses emotions and adds fuel to the fire. But this is dangerous thinking. Far from a great holy war, the Middle East conflict is largely about what most wars are about: a struggle for land and resources in a part of the world where both are scarce. We must think and act rationally, with this fact clearly in mind.
Report Post ».
3monkeysmomma
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 2:23pmOther than being a bit hawkish, there’s nothing wrong with Santorum. His biggest problem is that everything that comes out of his mouth sounds so snarky and arrogant most of us dread the thought of having to listen to him for 4 years.
I actually think he somehow manages to come across even more pompus than Obama, and thats a real trick!
Report Post »