Report: Upcoming ABC Interview With Gingrich Ex-Wife Could ‘End’ Candidate’s Career, Network Likely to Air This Thursday
- Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:19pm by
Tiffany Gabbay
- Print »
- Email »
UPDATE: An ABC News executive told The Associated Press the network is likely to air the interview Thursday on “Nightline.” The Blaze’s earlier report and background on the controversy follows below.
According to Drudge Report, Marianne Gingrich — ex-wife of GOP candidate Newt Gingrich — dropped what sources claim is a game-changing bombshell about the former House Speaker — one that could “end” her ex-husband’s career. The two-hour long interview, conducted last week by Brian Ross, is said to contain “explosive revelations” that will “rock the campaign trail.”
The controversial nature of the interview is now causing major waves at the network, according to sources, and a “civil war” has since exploded at ABC on exactly when the tell-all will air.
Drudge reports that executives at ABCNews say it would be “unethical” to run Marianne Gingrich’s interview so close to South Carolina Primary and that a tentative decision has been made to broadcast the interview next Monday after all votes have been counted.
According to Drudge, a source familiar with the incident finds the decision to hold off airing the segment until after the primary odd, given that ABC has been assailing other candidates aggressively.
Gingrich canceled a press conference on Wednesday, reportedly to address the matter.
This is not the first time, however that Gingrich’s second wife (out of three) has claimed she could level the Contract with America author’s career in one fell swoop.
Marianne was also interviewed for an Esquire profile of her ex-husband back in the summer of 201o. She touched on the idea of a Gingrich presidential run, saying, ”He believes that what he says in public and how he lives don’t have to be connected.” She added, “If you believe that, then yeah, you can run for president.”
Since he was a teenager, Newt Gingrich has never been without a wife, and his bond with Marianne Gingrich during the most pivotal part of his career made her the most important advisor to one of the most important figures of the late twentieth century. Of their relationship, she says, “We started talking and we never quit until he asked me for a divorce.”
She sounds proud, defiant, maybe a little wistful. You might be inclined to think of what she says as the lament of an abandoned wife, but that would be a mistake. There is shockingly little bitterness in her, and she often speaks with great kindness of her former husband. She still believes in his politics. She supports the Tea Parties. She still uses the name Marianne Gingrich instead of going back to Ginther, her maiden name.
But there was something strange and needy about him. “He was impressed easily by position, status, money,” she says. “He grew up poor and always wanted to be somebody, to make a difference, to prove himself, you know. He has to be historic to justify his life.”
She says she should have seen the red flags. “He asked me to marry him way too early. And he wasn’t divorced yet. I should have known there was a problem.” [...]
And he did the same thing to her eighteen years later, with Callista Bisek, the young congressional aide who became his third wife. “I know. I asked him. He’d already asked her to marry him before he asked me for a divorce. Before he even asked.”
He told you that?
“Yeah, he wanted to — ”
But she stops. “Hey, turn off the tape recorder for a second. This is going to go places …”
Meanwhile, as tentative plans to air the interview circulated, Gingrich’s campaign released a statement from his two daughters from his first marriage — Kathy Lubbers and Jackie Cushman — suggesting Marianne Gingrich’s comments may be suspect given the emotional toll divorce takes on those involved:
The following is an email from the Gingrich daughters to ABC News Leadership:
To: ABC News Leadership
From: Kathy Lubbers, Jackie Cushman
Date: January 18, 2012The failure of a marriage is a terrible and emotional experience for everyone involved. Anyone who has had that experience understands it is a personal tragedy filled with regrets, and sometimes differing memories of events.
We will not say anything negative about our father’s ex-wife. He has said before, privately and publicly, that he regrets any pain he may have caused in the past to people he loves.
ABC News or other campaigns may want to talk about the past, just days before an important primary election. But Newt is going to talk to the people of South Carolina about the future – about job creation, lower taxes, and about who can defeat Barack Obama by providing the sharpest contrast to his damaging, extreme liberalism. We are confident this is the conversation the people of South Carolina are interested in having.
Our father is running for President because of his grandchildren – so they can inherit the America he loves. To do that, President Obama must be defeated. And as the only candidate in the race, including Obama, who has actually helped balance the national budget, create jobs, reform welfare, and cut taxes and spending, Newt felt compelled to run – to serve his country and safeguard his grandchildren’s future.
Whether the interview will air this Thursday on Nightline has yet to be confirmed but a tweet from Politico’s Keach Hagey corroborates the claim:
This is a breaking story. Please check back for updates.
(h/t: Drudge)
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 688 Comments
‘Jumah at the DNC’ Speaker: ‘Muslims Visited America Prior to Columbus’ & ‘It Was a Muslim’ Who Guided Him to the ‘New World’ 536 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 458 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 374 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 333 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 301 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 313 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 210 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 148 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 301 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 301 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (790)
Bro Geo Too
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:34pmUnless there is ironclad, verifiable proof, e.g, a blue cocktail dress, this shapes up to be a “He said/She said”.
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:05pmI think you’re on to something. Maybe there were TWO stains on that blue dress… and one didn’t come from Bill
Report Post »ccr
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:10pmLook, this lady was a mistress……….who put up with a mistress……. MAYBE she thinks a serial adulterer and his mistress of 6 years shouldn’t be in the WH. I VERY MUCH agree w/her!!
From numerous stories that are out there………..maybe she will confirm that it wasn’t JUST herself and Calista that were mistresses…….there are numerous others.
We ALREADY know Newt has shown great impestous behavior in the past. His impestous, impulsive mouth CONTINUES even in this race. To think…….for one minute………that the Obama wouldn’t find any women he had affairs with in the past——IF that is the case———and smear him in a general election is TOTALLY NAIVE. If Marianne has information on this……..or other history that would UNDOUBTEDLY be exposed during a general election……it needs to come out BEFORE SC election.
On the other hand…………SC voters……..WHY, WHY would anyone RISK Obama finding and reporting every sordid detail in Gingrich’s past that would take the important discussion off of Obama???
Report Post »1froglegs
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:16pmI read last year that she said she could destroy him with a single interview and this shows her to be a woman of her word. Thankfully she is doing it now rather than in October. There is also an interview from the early 90′s with his first wife where Newt comes off as a dirtbag. People should steer clear of him and all his baggage because it makes him unelectable.
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:16pmHey if Newty used the argument with Romney that it is best to air his tax returns before the end of the primaries, then I think it is best that ALL (this could take some time,since there is so much garbage) of Newty’s laundry gets aired before the end of the primary season.
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:19pmI am not defending Gingrich here but the timing is from Romney. This is obvious.
Report Post »This will end Gingrich who is better than Romney at least. I just hate to wast another state towards Mitt. Eventually we will not be able to dig out and will end up with Mitt; who is better than McCain by far but is our worst candidate currrently.
Will a conservative have a chance? Maybe, but conservative candidates are going to be conservative candidate to win. I wish we had some conservative patriots running who would drop out already!!!. That’s all.
Fearnone
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:19pmWonder what the devastating news will be…
Report Post »Maybe that he launched his campaign from Bill Ayers house and is a friend of his or that he has a lot of communist and marxist friends. I hope not because Americans would never vote for someone like that…now would they?
MONICNE
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:19pmHe HAD to know that this story – (and many others) would eventually come out. This gentleman pursued the Clinton impeachment while banging Calista behind his family’s back – because he was extra Patriotic and Overworked. Now that he has converted to Catholic from True Christian, he works less, is less patriotic, more religious, and of course has been forgiven by pious evangelicals.
Sarah and Todd support Newt.TEA
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:21pm“WHY, WHY would anyone RISK Obama finding and reporting every sordid detail in Gingrich’s past that would take the important discussion off of Obama???”
This is exactly what I’m thinking when people imply that Gingrich is the most electable. Really?! How is Newt even competing with Santorum, or even Ron Paul, much less Romney? Romney’s past is so squeaky clean that they have to go back 28 years to a story about a dog in a kennel on top of his car, which ends with… the dog making it safely to their destination. Santorum’s past is so squeaky clean that they have to resort to making fun of his families reaction to a miscarriage. With Ron Paul, they have to go back 20 years to a newsletter of which he had no part in content creation.
With Newt, you don’t even have to go back 6 months to find pure gold! He started his campaign off by taking his ex-mistress now-wife on a cruise and racking up a $1 million tab at Tiffany’s… and now people want him to be in charge of a country with a severe debt problem?!
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:23pmREALLY? ABC ? (AGAIN) silly MSM, silly self-important “king makers” (right) SILLY people with a selective memory? I don‘t care if he’s really BATMAN or he slept with donkeys. I want someone who can deal with the MESS (as in LOSING OUR COUNTRY) we’re in. Do I wish he were pristine? SURE…am I NO. ARE YOU? NO. This is not stuff that happened LAST WEEK… do we all GROW UP??? I SURE AS HELL HOPE SO. WIll this matter to me. NO! it’s just another YAWN. Gwhiz, I‘m glad I don’t live in NYC.
Report Post »ccr
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:23pmI agree with that comment that if Newt thinks all of Mitt’s tax stuff needs to come out before the general………SURELY Newt’s laundry needs to get aired……….before the SC primary!
Come on, ABC……….REALLY???
Report Post »louise
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:24pmAnd this is who got a standing ovation from the bible belt.
Report Post »Writingdoc
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:25pmCCR is right..
There is a lot of verifiable stuff on Newt that guarantees he can’t win in Nov, no matter how well he debates. Even though many of these events were 20 years ago, and many people have either forgotten them or not known of them, they will all come out.
The left has plenty of researchers. And when Newt has acknowledged many of these events in the past and said he asked forgiveness…While God forgives, the American voters (esp independents) won’t accept it from the GOP in a general election…..
It isn’t worth voting for him, just to lose in the fall. We have to do better….Character matters!
Report Post »Mateytwo Barreett
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:25pmYou’ll never hear, or read anything like this about Obama. Apparently he has only had one woman in his life, and thats al we should be concerned about.
Report Post »TeaPartyForRomney
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:31pmThere is no way it was Romney, remember that they just attacked him on his taxes and the Cayman Islands. That does not sound like a network working with Romney. Both are very hard hitting to Moderates and many conservatives.
Report Post »TeaPartyForRomney
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:33pmWell I think if Gingrich wants Romney’s tax returns, he should provide his contract with Freddie mac, but he has already said “Hell No”
Romney needs to use his tax return against Obama, not Gingrich. Trade it for Obama’s college transcripts and thesis.
Report Post »drattastic
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:33pm“a woman scorned” think that says it all.
Report Post »ccr
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:34pmFreedompurveyor………good thoughts!
WHY do people consider Gingrich a VIABLE conservative option?? HE keeps the meme going. It’s false!
The past approx 8 years show:
*He takes $1.6 MIL from Freddie while Pres. Bush/Greenspan are trying to get REGULATIONS on Fred/Fan. “At the very least”, one political commentator writes, “Gingrich was paid to SHUT UP.” Only a fool thinks that Freddie/Fannie weren’t at the center of the housing crisis.
*He chums up with our favorite Pelosi in support of CAP & TRADE. Really?? A stupid mistake for you, you say. WELL, it’s a STUPID mistake for anyone who buys that excuse from him.
*He backs liberal Republican DeeDee Scozza…..(sp!) in 2010 elections. Oh, another mistake he says. Are you still buying Gingrich’s meme: “I’m the most conservative….blabla” ????
*Let’s not forget HE helped the Dept of Education come “to life”. The list goes on from what I hear, but this is enough for me!!
Compare that to Romney who spent the last 5 years supporting conservative (McCain wasn’t my favorite, BUT he WAS the GOP nominee and admire Mitt for doing what I could not have done in helping support him against Obama!!!) candidates……….ESPECIALLY in the 2010 elections!! What was Gingrich doing? Endorsing DeeDee, getting $60K speaking fees and writing books.
Yep……..Mitt, Santorum, Paul have less baggage all combined than Newt does!!
Report Post »Redd
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:35pmLarry Sinclair to debate Marianne Gingrich….developing…
Report Post »KTsayz
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:37pmUm, Bro Geo, It‘s Newt’s EX-WIFE so I‘m sure there’s plenty of DNA to recover.
But HEAR THIS PEOPLE!!!
When Ron Paul went ot DC to vote AGAINST a debt rise, he also INTRODUCED legislation to REPEAL sec 1021 of the NDAA!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grXmxxrxKb0&feature=player_embedded
No one should be supporting Romney or NEWT who are BOTH for this egregious abrogation of our God-given rights.
Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate looking to protect us from these eveil DC denizens who want to turn us into slaves!
Remember a terrorist is now classified as ANYONE who belongs to the TEA Party movement, ANY soldier returning frm the battlefield, ANYONE who owns a gun!
Vote WISELY! Voet Ron Paul!
Report Post »President Ron Paul 2012
crackerone
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:37pmI sure hope gerbils aren’t involved………….oh wait. that’s B O!
Report Post »drattastic
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:38pmThe marxist must be laughing their“collective”asses off especially the“ failure n chief”, know that emperor obama was never vetted and never will be. While Republicans slit each others throats.
Report Post »ccr
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:40pmRomney did not do this.
Gingrich ALONE is RESPONSIBLE for HIS history! Gingrich ALONE is RESPONSIBLE for HIS choices!!
If his “remorse” over his history is indeed REAL, then he needs to NOT MAKE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVES go through this. His “remorse” would be more than his EGO.
Because one has “repented” does NOT make one “worthy” to be the leader (and wife) of the greatest country in the world. We NEED examples of goodness.
Choices DO have consequences. “Remorse” does NOT take away all consequences.
Report Post »fb274
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:45pmRecycled story previously told in Esquire, years back———–http://www.esquire.com/print-this/newt-gingrich-0910?page=all Guess Marianne is still p-oded with Newt.
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:46pmSo Newt not only a War monger but also a Whore monger?? Hmmmm. Maybe they go hand in hand? Interesting.
So why not support a good Christian man like Dr. Paul? He’s never been unfaithful to his wife.. They’ve been married an eternity and I bet if she got sick Dr. Paul would probably be courageous enough to stand by her side? I believe even Mitt would do that but not Newt… lol
So long Newt…
Report Post »Twobyfour
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:50pmCCR and others, well… cast your stones. I am sure your choices are pristine and you’d be excellent candidates for sainthood.
Report Post »DiamondDog
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:54pmI don’t think any of us are the same person we were 10 years ago. King David had his own problems too.
Report Post »KTsayz
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:55pmNewt will be burned by Obeyme is he gets the nomination. All BO has to do is a 24/7 ad campaign on how Newt agrees with Alvin Toffler that the Constitution is ‘outdated’ and need to be ‘buried’ alongside Thomas Jefferson. Do Tea Partiers believe our Constitution needs to go? Do Republicans also want to get rid of our Constitution?
Well, from what I saw of that last debate in SC, it seems like SO Carolinans want our Constitution gone. And they are the ones who elect Lindsey Graham all the time, the guy Ron Paul quoted today, so there must be a lot of very ignorant people in SC.
Lindsey Graham said this while pushing FOR the NDAA:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pD0GthpIgQw&feature=related
Enemy combant is anything the government wants it to be: Tea Partiers, gun owners, soldiers returning from the battlefield. But they still allow thousands of illegals to cross our borders with nary a sound.
Wake up! Newt = Romney = Obama
President Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 9:00pm“I am sure your choices are pristine and you’d be excellent candidates for sainthood.”
Yes, nobody is perfect. That, however, does not mean that we should not judge someone, who is running for president, for the repeated poor choices in their life. His actions show that he is arrogant and self centered, reckless and irresponsible. Are these qualities we look for in a president?
Report Post »lel2007
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 9:04pmI’m sure Marianne is revealing this news about Newt now, after all these years, out of a powerful patriotic urge of obligation to save America.
Report Post »hidden_lion
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 9:12pmNewt is an A-hole. This is old news. He is not a good person. He is smart, but not nice.
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 9:25pmCCR . . .Calista was his mistress too, for eight years. and Newt’s been “impetuous”? I don’t think so. Impetuous is a 14-year-old kid stealing a pack of cigarettes. This guy is a serial philanderer, classic abuser of power, and pathological liar. I suggest you move on to Romney, You’re headed there anyway. Why volunteer to embarrass yourself any further by supporting this putz?
Report Post »robert
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 9:26pmA he said she said coming from a divorced spouse shouldn’t be given any serious consideration, especially since it is obviously orginating from a radical leftist news organization that has a track record of witholding valid news events and exaggerating others to fit its radical agenda.
Consider how hard these far left news orgs are trying to dig up any kind of dirt whatsoever on any conservative candidate in order to help their candidate…the community organizer….get re-elected. And consider that they never even made a weak attempt to vet Obama, because they’re in his corner carrying his water even though there are many mysteries about this evil mam that are unexplained, because they refused to look into them.
Pretending there‘s a war going on about airing this woman’s bitterness is strictly for the purpose of making the information itself more dire. There’s no objection to trashing a conservative candidate among these radical leftist dorks. They pretend what they pretend in order to hopefully build viewership and make it appear worse than it really is.
Anything this radical news organization has to say, directly or via one of its dug up malcontent is going to be ignored by me.
Hopefully a good number of other people will feel the same way.
Report Post »thegrassroots
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 9:26pmThat Did It! Romney and The Libs Are Firing The Smear Guns!
That Means Newt Has Romney and The Libs Scared All The Way Into Desperation!
I’ll Be Supporting Newt From Here On Out!
~~~~~~~
Report Post »SAY ROMNEY! WHAT ABOUT THE CAYMAN ISLANDS? America NEEDS TO SEE and HAS THE RIGHT TO SEE Your Tax Returns NOW!
Vechorik
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 9:34pmmaybe it‘s something related to Newt’s corruption?
Newt Gingrich was under FBI investigation for bribery
Little known to the American public Newt Gingrich and his then wife Marianne were the subject of a US Justice Department criminal investigation in the late 1990s involving a $10 million bribe of the world’s largest private arms dealer, Sarkis Soghanalia.
Unaware that Soghanalian was an FBI informant, it is alleged that Marianne Gingrich whilst working for the Israel Export Development Corporation (IEDC) tried to facilitate a bribe to the tune of $10 million so that her husband could use his influence to lift the arms embargo against Iraq in order for Soghanalian to collect an outstanding payment of $54 million from Saddam Hussein.
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 9:40pm“SAY ROMNEY! WHAT ABOUT THE CAYMAN ISLANDS? America NEEDS TO SEE and HAS THE RIGHT TO SEE Your Tax Returns NOW!”
Hmm, I don’t think anyone has the “right” to see anyone else’s tax returns. Nobody has implied that Romney did anything illegal, and he has said he will release his tax returns in April, just like every other presidential candidate usually does.
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 9:53pmFEARALL . . Old news. Irrelevant. You freaked out tea Buggereres will gnash your teeth about because Hannity tells you to. But the vast majority of us, you know, the real free thinking patriotic Americans, don’t care. Your circle of psychos continues to get ever smaller, ever tighter, to match the rest of your clenched sphincters.
Report Post »candcantiques
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 9:59pmWho is the best debater. Gingrich hands down. His crime, he cheated on his wives. Who do we want out of office. Obama. His crime? Lets see where to start. Cocaine use, ties to a radical church, ties to the Weather underground, killing jobs and business, cant pass the governments employment verification, and on and on and on. Do we need a squeeky clean candidate? NO! We need somebody smart enough and articulate enough to whip Obamas a$$!
Report Post »jzs
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:13pmObviously she was paid off by the left, just as all the Cain accusers were.
Report Post »spankadonkey
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:19pmAll you Paulbutz jump in and have a great time with this. That won’t change the fact that Paul is a FRAUD, is wacky, is a hypocrite, is squeaky, is confused, can’t talk like a human being, and most of all, he is UN-ELECTABLE. Any your trashing all the other candidates only convinces normal people to discount Ron FRAUD Paul. What a guy.
Report Post »ThatsJustCrazyTalk
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:48pmIs this anything like a “Norma Jean Young” moment for Obama? I think whoever the Republican representative is should do a story with Ms. Young. She‘s been trying for years to get a microphone to expose Obama’s bi-ness and “convenient” death of her son. Wonder why ABC, or any MSM outlet hasn’t given her an interview?
Report Post »Luke611
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:49pmNarcissism – A heightened abnormal sense of self-admiration.
self-absorption, arrogance, self-centeredness, haughtiness, smugness, self-interest, egocentrism, overt-assurance, braggert, conceit, superiority-complex, egocentricity, egoism, egomania, vanity, overconfidence, presumption, pride, self-importance, self-admiration, self-confidence, self-love, self-possessed, self-regard, selfishness ….obvious the issue here is “self” internalized.
Newts narcissistic to the fully definition, and #2 accliaming his insecurity, inablity to be alone, jumping from one bed to the next; clearly defines this horrendous debilitating pshycological trait.
Do y’all seriously wish to have someone with such destructive behavior carry our flag?
Report Post »Obama is just has self-absorbed as Gingrich, and look where we are…
Hobbs57
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:55pmThese must be the same fans giving this creep and pathetic excuse for a human, a standing ovation as he insulted a huge majority of hard working family’s who already feel terrible about having to get food stamps to feed their children. Funny, only an insensitive ***** could do live this way. Not to mention his Muslim ties to the group Arcapita, the premier member of his Center for Health Transformation. Arcapita only does business with those who are Sharia Compliant and need a political insider to make business moves inside the US, that would be Newt. Yeah, the same ***** who left his wife as he was ill who calls Romney despicable names while Romney took an entire year off of work to care for his ailing wife. But that shouldn’t change you Evangelicals minds, no, in no way what so ever. Not even the secret discussions and deals he made with Clinton behind closed doors that forced his hand once the Lewinsky scandal hit the fan, as the Republicans bled seats as a result. No, he save America remember, through some deal that cost us the house and senate. I see it far to often as a budding psychologist, people who get fulled by soci-paths like Newt, have a large laundry list of their own at home. Convincing themselves they can act and live how they want in the world, just as long as they go to church and say they believe in Christ. Go read the esquire article to get warmed up, I can’t wait for this pig to fry.
Report Post »thegrassroots
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:57pm@freedompurveyor
And, about an hour ago you said: “…. That however does not mean that we should not judge someone, who is running for president, …”
So, freedom ___, You Are Saying Newt Should Be Vetted; BUT, Romney Should NOT Be Vetted!
Just like Romney, You Speak Out Of Both Sides Of Your Mouth!
You Are Nothing More Than A Romney-Troll, Paid By Romney To Make Scatter-Shot Inane Comments.
Get Lost Little Romney-Troll! You’ve Blown Your Cover!
Report Post »Puddle Duck
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:08pmHell the only difference (as far as electability goes) comes down to the letter beside the surname…if it’s a D then all is forgiven, if it’s an R, all hell should break loose right ? Clinton was elected and re-elected even though he was involved, in real time when he was running for office with other women (often times using the WH for nefarious purposes in later years) lied about it (during a prime time address to the public and in his impeachment hearing) and yet the MSM did thier level best to say, so what it’s only sex, it should not reflect upon the job he is doing as Gov/POTUS. I certainly remember the MSM double standard going back to the 60′s. Nixon was forced to resign for less than what Clinton got away with and yet Democrats and by exstension, through the MSM cover-up, thought of Clinton as one of the better Presidents….Really …Really ???? What Hypocrites.
Newt would make a really good POTUS IMO since he‘s as tough as a junkyard dog and that is whjat the GOP will need in order to overcome the firestorm the Democrats will unleash should Repubs win control of the Fed Gov’t and start repealing all of the mistakes of the last 3 decades. I don’t trust Romeny or Santorum to have the backbone to get it done….deep down, do you either ? I seem to remember America as being the nation that gives someone a second chance if they have tried hard to right wrongs of thier past.. Well, what say you (as Bill O would opine) ?
Report Post »RJO
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:09pmSooooooooooooooo……….
When does ABC air their “career-ending” piece on Obama’s relationship and connection to the hard-left Chicago/Marxists who non-“mainstream” media have been reporting on for some time? How about the ABC story concerning the Reverend Wright and his connection and influence over certain politicians?
When does ABC dive into a report on sealed academic records by the current occupant of the White House?
Hypocrites.
I am NO Gingrich fan – but this reeks of the incredible BIAS that has turned a once semi-noble profession into the prostitution ring that it is today.
Yuck.
Report Post »RCScrolls
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:27pmTrust me I was there in the ninties and have had to be sworn to secrecy, its bad and no He wont get a vote after whats revealed especially when it comes to Marriage, even His new wife knows all about it. Kinda a woman or prize on the arm reflects soundness, but its not that!!
Report Post »BeHeardAmerica
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:29pmSo suck it up all you conservatives. With all the hoopla this last few years Beck preaching the TRUTH (?) we get to embrace the Northeastern Moderate Mormon. OMG I’m having a nightmare.
Report Post »Bucky007
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:42pmMemo to Newt Gingrich:
We have located your “baggage”, and boy is she pissed.
If only she had been set up with a Tiffany’s account.
Her 18 years of marriage to your Humpty Dumpty lard a$$ is the only credential she needs.
Let the Women speak. Let the games begin.
How do you like him now, Rush, Hannity, Palin, Murdoch and Fox News.
He’s one hell of a guy, ain’t he, just peachy.
Yu asked for Transparency Newt, open wide, here it comes.
What goes around comes around Newt.
May the Newtering, commence!
The bloated, fat, adulterer is aobut to
Report Post »Mimi24
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:57pmSeems to me like someone tried this with Nikki Haley too. No proof. Show it or shut the hell up.
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:57amDrudge reports that executives at ABCNews say it would be “unethical” to run Marianne Gingrich’s interview so close to South Carolina Primary
_____________
I don’t know.. depends on what it is. But the SC voters have a right to know BEFORE they vote right?
Report Post »FranciscoDAnconia
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:13amWe crucified Clinton for his bedroom behavior and he is a democrat. Most democrats don’t stamp virtue and family values on their banner and yet Newt gets a pass? Really? Newt can cheat on how many two different wives and thats some how okay? Do republicans stand for any thing, or is family values and commitment just convenient campaign slogans? Is this what you call a double standard? This is unbelievable.
Report Post »NewpresidentforUSA
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:15amI don’t care about his married life. He was married to a woman correct? He didn‘t jeopardize national security by cheating in the White House and he didn’t promote a criminal religion that pretends to be kind and just but instead it teaches to kill all that appose it.
Report Post »pamela kay
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:20amBRO GEO TOO, first of all if she beleives in his political views, and the TEA PARTY, she has to understand the danger of having Obama win the election in 2012 so why would she do this now? I have to question the timing. Could Romney be behind this, or Paul? I do not think Santorum or Perry are. I could be wrong on that I am not 100% sure. It could also be Obama because he has to be worried about having a debate with Newt. Why would she do this before SC has voted? Something smells fishy. Every time a candidate gets closer some kind of scandal about them pops up. Coincedence? I don’t think so. Either someone wants Romney or Paul to get the nomination. It would benefit the dems because neitther could beat Obama. It would eliminate Newt for Paul and Romney. I am just saying…..something juat aint right here. The good news is Newt has already expressed his regrets, the bad news is until now there hasn’t been a face attached to it.
Report Post »ghostsouls
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:29amThis is total BS, “A spokesperson for the Romney campaign says Romney follows all tax laws and he would pay the same in taxes regardless of where the funds are based. ” and NO matter where the money is they paid ALL US taxes on it. So what is the problem? Is it now illegal to have money, to invest or be rich, if that’s the case Ron Paul can step out, he has tons of money. The Kennedy’s should never had held ANY office. Why is everyone suppose to be dirt poor? Romney violated NO laws, and it is NOT illegal to be rich. One would think that if he could grow their personal investments to that degree, just think of how he would invest OUR taxpayer money??? He would certainly be better at it than the obamas, who can do nothing but SPEND our money like it’s running water. Think about it, if someone took $10k from you to invest would you want Romney to invest it, or obama? obama would get from obama is the receipts he used to invest your money into failing green companies, whereas Romney, would reap you a huge wind fall. This is just like Cain, and they trotted out all those women, where are they now? Not one of them are saying a thing? They were paid off like prostitutes, just so obama didn’t have to run against a genuine black man, and so they could use the race card. Mitt DO NOT release your income tax records, until obama releases his college transcripts….. We have waited almost a full term and they are still in hiding… so what’s the big secret, foreign student aid?
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:13amGhost I agree… capitalism is DEFINITELY under attack right now. It’s like a badge of DIShonor to have money these days. OWS doesn’t help. Class envy. People, can’t you see? The socialist mentality is creeping through the minds of Americans like a dark shadow.
Report Post »Jaels_Song
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:20amIt was he said, she said, with Cain too, and look what happened. Pray for America, if we end up being taken down over revelations like this, we will be stuck 4 more years with Obama, and that will be the final death nail to the America we grew up under.
Report Post »Callie369
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:16amI don‘t give a rat’s behind about the rantings of an old broad spurned! What I DO CARE ABOUT is my country which Dumbama is slowly destroying. ABC News couldn’t be bothered vetting Dumbama. They hid John Edward’s affair. They backed Bill Clinton’s Oval Office bull crap. ABC stinks to the high heaven. Wonder how much the old hag is being paid to try and torpedo Newt?
Report Post »GETLIFE
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:32amWho is behind this (if anyone) is not important. If Gingrich goes down because we don‘t like something about him and we think he’s expendable, Romney will go down for his taxes or his non-disclosure, or whatever the media decides to harp on. And there you have the 2 people who could seriously debate Obama–GONE.
Report Post »Ruler4You
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:33amYeah, but you can bet your last nickle ‘ABC’ will hold this only until they are sure they can do the most damage to his candidacy.
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:34amYa know, The “let he who is without sin, cast the first stone” incident is one of the most well-known lessons of the Bible. A woman, who had been caught in the act of adultery was brought to Jesus Christ by the scribes and Pharisees as a test to see if the Messiah was a liberal in matters of the Law of God. In response to their deceitful query, He didn’t condemn the woman, not because He was a liberal, not because He condoned her sin, but because the men who brought the woman to Him were Hypocrites. He was the only person there that day who was free of sin, the only one who had the right to “cast the first stone.” He didn’t stone her (or her accusers), but instead forgave her and told her to “sin no more.” Otherwise, the day is coming when she, if she didn’t thereafter repent, won’t be stoned, but will be burned – along with the hypocrites who brought her to Him that day, if they didn’t thereafter repent of their sin:
Report Post »MYHEROISRON
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 6:09amI say air the interview, then we go to ABC and take a flamethrower to the place!!!!
Report Post »loriann12
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 6:39amHow credible is an EX spouse? I would hate to think what my ex would say about me. And it‘s worse when they’re (the ex) not the one who initiated the divorce. Can you say Hell hath no fury…?
Report Post »I_Hate_Libs
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:07amAnd how is this suppose to destroy him?
Anyone But Obama 2012!
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:28amAnd we all know how creditable our ex wives stories are……HAHAHAHAHAHAH
Report Post »tHEY MIGHT AS WELL HAD DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ write the story…….
@leftfighter
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:28amPesonally, I’m with CCR on this one.
My Clinton Rule of Thumb:
“If his own wife can’t trust him, l neither can I.”
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:32amencinom,
Report Post »Clinton’s impeachment had nothing to do with the affair and everything to do with Commie Bill lying under oath.
CIAtroll
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:59amThis Clown could not even get on the Ballot in his own state of residence
and Satan or um Scares the Hell out me, he wants to redefine Happiness
Breitbart TV’s representative in New Hampshire caught up with Rick Santorum as he delivered some last-minute speeches before Tuesday’s primary vote. In this Thursday appearance, Santorum delves into his interpretation of the Constitution’s guarantee of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.“ Citing a ”different definition at the time of our Founders,“ the former Senator argues that ”happiness” includes a moral element beyond one’s wants.
Report Post »http://www.breitbart.tv/santorum-on-the-stump-pursuit-of-happiness-means-doing-what-we-ought-to-not-what-we-want/ all you have to do is listen to him.
CIAtroll
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:00amNewt is stealing my Hitler pose
Report Post »CIAtroll
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:02amBeck: “They control your life and your pursuit of happiness” and “they will have every bit of” liberty, too
July 23, 2010 5:45 pm ET
From the July 23 edition of Fox News’ Glenn Beck:
Report Post »CIAtroll
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:03amonly Libertarians can pose like Hitler
Report Post »CIAtroll
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:06amn their book, Tarpley and Chaitkin explain that in this way a significant part of the Bush family’s financial base is related to supporting and aiding Adolph Hitler. Therefore, the current U.S. president, just like his father (former CIA director, vice president and president) reached the peak of the U.S. political hierarchy thanks to his great-grandfather and grandfather and generally his entire family, who financially aided and encouraged the Nazis. http://www.rense.com/general40/bushfamilyfundedhitler.htm
Report Post »TJeff1
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:37amI think this has to do with THIS@!:
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/317440
“”"Little known to the American public Newt Gingrich and his then wife Marianne were the subject of a US Justice Department criminal investigation in the late 1990s involving a $10 million bribe of the world’s largest private arms dealer, Sarkis Soghanalia.
Unaware that Soghanalian was an FBI informant, it is alleged that Marianne Gingrich whilst working for the Israel Export Development Corporation (IEDC) tried to facilitate a bribe to the tune of $10 million so that her husband could use his influence to lift the arms embargo against Iraq in order for Soghanalian to collect an outstanding payment of $54 million from Saddam Hussein. “”"”
Report Post »Polwatcher
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:38amNow we know with total clarity who the MSM and Obama want the Republicans to run for President. They know that if they get rid of Gingrich, then Romney wins the primary and Obama gets re-elected. They must have the goods on Romney. The Dems are screwing the people like they always do.
Report Post »lillymckim
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:49amThe State News ABC the All Barrack Channel wants Romney as their choice and thats become very obvious.
They do not want to see what Newt will do to their leader … they are running scared of Newt
It’s also very obvious Newts ex wife never recovered from the divorce.
I think she should seek help for her bitter resentment and to help her move on.
Report Post »Dcjones
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:50amYea she is spilling her guts now, this is pretty damming but old news:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/12/30/1050139/-Marianne-Gingrichs-take
I am thinking it has to do with the Bribes:
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/317440
Report Post »Jackers
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:50amThis ABC interview should not be the reason to end Newt’s career… The fact that Newt Gingrich is an open-border, One World Order Progressive should end his career.
Please read The Morrison Report entitled, “Gingrich is Not the GOP’s Answer to Obama,” by Peter Morrison. This fact-filled article is now available on Liberty Post and will give you insight as to what Newt Gingrich is really all about…
Report Post »HKS
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:52amReally, I guess there is no end to what the democrats will do to get Romney in the race against Obama. They know they can bury him in the general election. What would anyone expect from an ex-wife. I‘ll even bet they didn’t have to pay her much. Take it for what it is, another liberal attack to protect Obama. Politicians are not saints, none of them. When it comes to the morals bar, you get low and lower with all politicians, after all they started as lawyers and went down. The one we have in the white house now has set that bar to a new low. The real sad part of this story is he didn’t do it alone, the media is working hard to keep him polished.
Report Post »lillymckim
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:03amIt’s such old news but ABC is running scared of Newt and what he will do to their leader.
Report Post »Newt handed George his asz the last debate and Stephanopoulos holds a grudge.
FEISTY
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:17amF ABC, F ABC TWO TIMES!!
Report Post »The so-called skeletons have been out there for years, and just when it seems all of the swamp-dragging of his personal life over the past 6 months hasn’t knocked him out yet, the manipulative media decides to interview one of his ex’s to find something more provocative and then drop it right before a primary?? Who the F does ABC think it is? King Makers? If it wasn’t Newt it would be someone else. This is the Obama minions doing everything they can to take down candidates.
This is is personal life. NONE OF OUR BUSINESS WHOM HE MARRIED AND DIVORCED. Usually when people divorce it doesn’t end with flowers and champagne. They’re often ugly. But a falling out of one‘s relationships has nothing to do with anything else as long as he didn’t chop his exes up and put them through a wood chipper. He struck out in some marriages — WHAT IS THE CURRENT DIVORCE RATE? Why does the media act like he is the first person to have a failed marriage? Is there a proper way for two adults to dissolve their marriage that doesn’t attract scrutiny? Name one President (OR PERSON FOR THAT MATTER) who is perfect? Why should anyone listen to Glenn Beck? He’s a failed alcoholic? A bum. Amazing how he and other can get high and mighty when attacking others like Newt who have failed at something. And Newt says he’s turned his personal life around, built a closer relationship with his faith, why isn’t that enough? Didn’t Beck claim the SAME THING? Didn’t he too hav
qzak491
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:00amIt kinda makes you wonder why ABC isn’t airing the records concerning Romneys actions at Bain. Why has Romney not faced the same problems that the other candadites have. Newt was taking on Romney on his record and like osama he can’t win on his record so Newt has to go. If ABC doesn’t air Romneys record, Newt should sue them for discrimination. Romney is a plant by soros so no matter who wins soros’ agenda can continue. Romney is a white osama plain and simple. This is not an election, it‘s a contuation of soros’ agenda and anyone that has a chance of beating osama that soros can’t control has to go. People with real principles can’t be bought, Romney has been bought, what does that tell you. ROMNEY IS EVIL
Report Post »
Report Post »qzak491
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:18amIt kinda makes you wonder why ABC isn’t airing the records concerning Romneys actions at Bain. Why has Romney not faced the same problems that the other candadites have. Newt was taking on Romney on his record and like osama he can’t win on his record so Newt has to go. If ABC doesn’t air Romneys record, Newt should sue them for discrimination. Romney is a plant by soros so no matter who wins soros’ agenda can continue. Romney is a white osama plain and simple. This is not an election, it‘s a contuation of soros’ agenda and anyone that has a chance of beating osama that soros can’t control has to go. People with real principles can’t be bought, Romney has been bought, what does that tell you. ROMNEY IS EVIL
Report Post »joe conservative
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:47amHow shocking that his ex doesn’t like him. Even more shocking that this will be treated as news by the lamestream media. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1BVPyIXZzRg
Report Post »TomFerrari
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:13pmSounds like its time to parade around that guy that claimed he had sex with obama and got drugs from obama multiple times.
Report Post »Why does ABC (the All Barack Channel) not air dirty laundry hearsay like that??
Why? Could it be that Disney (owns ABC) is in bed w obama? Has donated to obama, pushes a “green” agenda? Pushes globalism? Pushes liberal social values? Pushes anti-military agendas? (avatar)
Is it time for a new media company that embraces AMERICAN values? Moral values? Truth? Goodness? Godly values?
Oh, let’s not forget Disney also owns espn and fired Bocephus for making an analogy that questioned their chosen one! Walt is rolling in his grave, as is Roy, who WARNED stockholders this would happen!!
Fantastic Four
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:33pmit is absolutely true MSLSD said so. That is more proof that the establishments golden boy is the next person in-line ooops i meant the best choice we have to beat SCROTUS. We need to make sure we all vote for Mitt O’bamney oops again mitt romney he will bring back the power to the people. It was silly to think that we actually had a candidate that was giog to destroy the people with a 999 plan. The tax code needs to stay in control of the establishment politicians becasue they know better how to look out and take care of us much much better than our idiot minds could ever dream of.
Report Post »IMPEACHBHO
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:16pmThe media never vetted BHO! Let’s here about Bill Ayers – his communist terrorist buddy, or the full story on the racism and hatred for America from the church the BHO attended.
So who’s next? SANTORUM. They will attack him for his Christianity. Just watch. BUT HERE IS THE MANTRA TO RESPOND WITH – OBAMA SAY HE IS A CHRISTIAN TOO – NEXT QUESTION.
Stay focused – BHO and the Media – they are the problem.
Report Post »http://youtu.be/7kqVZUCRth0
SticksandStones
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 10:20amDoes character matter? Yes.
Report Post »Does the truth matter? YES!
Does how he conduct his personal life affect how he will conduct his public life? Yes. Has he learned and changed from the past? I hope so. I’m waiting to see how he handles the scrutiny. Remember, Reagan was divorced, and the GOP insiders despised and even HATED him before he was elected. Remember Churchill was feared he would be a “loose cannon” before he came to power.
Conventional Wisdom is usually wrong.
“Let he who has no sin throw the first stone.”
bloodrage
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:33pmNo matter what, Newt’s ego will play a major role in the story. His ego will be his undoing.
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:39pmAlready has been.
Report Post »Mrs. Evil
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:42pmSo true.
Report Post »READRIGHTHERE
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:21pmComing soon, a direct quote from conventional wisdom, “Who’s Newt?”
Report Post »ROMNEY2012
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:22pmGingrich is a sleazy, dishonorable man.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:43pmI agree with you. Kinda like loosing his speaker of the house!
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 9:15pmI bet he’s been having sex with REGGIE BUSH….. oops no, thats Obama…
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 9:48pmand his ego is what allowed him to think he could cheat on several of his wives… this guy thinks he’s entitled to anything he desires.
Report Post »Puddle Duck
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:53pmAnd yet Obama‘s considerable ego was considered an indispensible prerequisite for consideration as an elidgable Democratic candidate during the ’08 campaign, for an office where leadership and self assuredness is key …..does anyone think Obama has exercised anything remotely close to what we could all agree upon as effective leadership since taking office ?
Report Post »Diamond Girl
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:58pmYou hit the nail on the head!
Check this out ~
http://angrywhitedude.com/2012/01/the-arrogance-of-newt-calls-for-santorum-and-perry-to-step-aside/
It may be more than interesting what she has to day…but Newty does himself in every-time he gets full of himself, which is early and often.
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:36amGingrich is a sleazy, dishonorable man
Report Post »And who better take on a corrupt sleazy dishonorable chicago politician than someone who can fight his fight.
Bill Rowland
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:09amRemember Newts contract with America? His high moral code, the cohesion of the American family? Christian values and faithfulness to your spouse.
Do as I say not as I do.
Newts moral value
OMG
Report Post »lillymckim
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:52amEgo?
Clinton was elected to “two terms”.
Report Post »starman70
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:40amEGO? HUH!!! That is what happens to so many of our elected officials in Washington, State houses, county councils and city councils, Many of these people are re-elected over and over and over again. Soon, they get the idea that they can do anything their heart desires. Why else do we have the corruption in almost every branch of government.
TERM LIMITS!!!! No more than 2 terms for ANY elected representatives ANYWHERE! After 2 terms, let them go home and live among real people in the real world and away from the fantasy world they created for themselves. Furthermore, they would be banned from ALL lobbying activities for at least 10 years after leaving office.
START DRAINING THE SWAMP NOW!!!! Clean out the Senate and the House in 2012!!!!
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:59amGingrich is a sleazy hippo.
TEA
Report Post »IMPEACHBHO
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:33pmSince the media likes to interview sex scandals, how about one of the major networks interviewing Larry Sinclair that claims he gave oral sex (on more than one occasion) to BHO? It’s his claim. PLUS, he claims he spoke with a choir member of Wrights church about BHO – and shortly after that the man was found shot to death. Seems a lot more scandalous than this story. Let’s go media – are you cowards or just in bed with BHO – or both? No? Then investigate and air an interview with Larry. Fair is fair.
Report Post »blackcatrun
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:33pmEver get the feeling that this nation is a dictatorship now more than ever? Nothing like watching humans trying to pick who can choke the life out of the U.S. the fastest, romney or obama.
My moneys on the romney camp doing this to Newt. The guys a closet demon.
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:42pmRomney is definitely behind this. No doubt.
Report Post »It could back fire.
Mrs. Evil
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:42pmMr. Gingrich has done this to Mr. Gingrich. No one else to blame.
Report Post »KangarooJack
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:43pmMaybe…my $$$’s on Obamabots diggin in the dirt.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:43pmSo even if it isn’t “career ending” .. they put out that it is .. and that they hope will end it anyway … so ethical aren’t they .. that they will wait until after the next vote .. but put out that it is career ending … round and round we go .. spin spin spin .. OBAMA MSM SUCKS!
Report Post »AmeriCat
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:17pmThis story reeks of Romney at work….or his smythers.
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:20pmRomney had nothing to do with this. This woman did a full Esquire interview in the fall…it is just that the MSM and Fox didn’t feel it was necessary to bring her into the picture until now.
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:22pmRomney did this and is capable of this (towards a republican). That is my point. My comment is not about Gingrich. What was said about Cain is a lie though and this dirt bag probably was behind that too. .
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:22pmWhy would Romney want to force another ABR candidate to leave the race? It benefits Romney to have the ABR vote split.
Report Post »READRIGHTHERE
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:27pmAre you kidding me? Newt, a serial adulterer, a career politician, and if you will, which you won‘t but I’ll say it anyway, a scam artist historian, is considered to be the victim here? And you think Romney, a faithful husband, a successful business man, and a church going, fiscal conservative, is behind Newt’s possible demise from the mouth of a woman he cheated with and on. Romney wouldn’t touch this woman with a ten foot pole. Newt is on implode watch. T minus 10 days and counting…
I can‘t even think of what to say about you guys choosing to hold Newt’s hand through this coming crisis. Character counts and Oh what a character Newt is!
Report Post »READRIGHTHERE
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:32pmAnd Patrick, why aren’t you upset with Newt for not being a cleaner option. Here he knows what is about to come out, and knew it probably would from the beginning but he hedged his bets that he could rise from the dust, and through his deceit broadsided you with political disappointment. You might get stuck with Romney now for your nominee. And yet, true to form, you think this whole plot to rob you of your happiness comes from Romney. Your comments make you sound like the guy in jail, who doesn’t think he did anything wrong, and is just plain mad at the rat that got him caught. Lay the blame where it belongs; Newt’s lap (an apparently dangerous place full of bombshells).
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:33pmBecause it is a calculation. If Mitt wins 3 in a row historically it is over. That is why Mitt is taking Out Gingrich now. As he did Cain.
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:37pmRomney is behind this. I am NOT sold on Gingrich.
Report Post »Romey can when SC now and thinks he is inevitable after that. He may be right.
He outed Cain too because he was a Ronald Reagan and would role on all of them combined.. Romney is not.
texrubarts
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:48pmI agree with your comments!! I can NOT believe how cruel this political game has gotten since Obama came into the picture!!! And I DO believe this is ONLY the beginning – just wait until Obama gets in there AGAIN!!
Newt – you are in my prayers!!
Report Post »READRIGHTHERE
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:51pmPatrick,
There is a hole in your bucket. What about the other candidates? If Newt bows out this minute, Santorum may have a chance to beat Romney. This is 100 percent Karma at work. The timing is fate. Things happen. Santorum has a day to seize this opportunity to put Newt to pasture, but my guess is he won’t take it. Don‘t harp up Romney’s backside because he ran a better campaign and keeps a clean closet. Romney has had about as much to do with this development as Al Gore did with the internet, or BHO has had to do with our “salvation” from the economic collapse that was sure to happen.
Report Post »Fed up in Bama
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:53pmPatrick is right. It’s a ploy to hand Romney the winner in South Carolina. The story isn’t even being aired. All they have to do is through out some spin about ‘what is in the interview’ and the poll numbers and end votes will stop for Newt.
Report Post »Funny…the media didn‘t bring out ANYONE from Obama’s past. (Some tried to bring up Saul L., the grand Reverend from hell, etc. It was squished.)
They rule us guys. We are no longer free.
THEY decide who we vote for.
Scared yet? We should be.
IMPEACHBHO
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:52pmRomney probably is happy about it, but I don’t think he was behind it. It’s very clear to me that the State media is behind it.
Report Post »TJexcite
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:33pmCome out when you can do the most harm to Newt and all the republicans. Like after he wins or comes very close to win in SC so he has to drop out after almost winning and send the race into a mess.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:09amHonestly, it’s better now than if he was the nominee. I’m sure they have a story or two about Romney they ARE holding back until the general election. They are just in the process of assuring Romney will be the nominee at this point. They don’t want all their Romney smears to go to waste.
Report Post »Meanwhile Obama continues to enjoy a glossed over past that gets zero scrutiny from the MSM.
momrules
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:33pmAnother search and destroy mission from the left and the MSM coming soon to a TV near you.
By the way what ever happened to the women lining up to give their “stories” about Heman Cain. My guess is they they got paid by their handlers and then crawled back under their rocks.
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:37pmMSM supplied by Romney.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:41pmNow that the “heat” on those women has cooled down .. would be a good time for someone to FOLLOW THE MONEY and see who paid them off.
Report Post »momprayn
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:44pmYeah, that’s what a lot of us were wondering & this reminded me of….and if this kind of thing will come up to end whoever else they can ruin in the near future — or…..as an October surprise. As for me, if they did this with our nominee, I would still vote for him — have to be better than Obama and at least we’d get rid of the Marxist regime they have in all Depts. – like the DOJ, etc. Like Mark Levin says, I’d vote for an orange juice can rather than Obama.
Report Post »saranda
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:22pmNewt is a serial adulterer and yet the Christian right decided that was okay. This was a trainwreck waiting to happen. Nothing to do with Obama or the MSM, this is Newt’s fault for being such a dbag.
Report Post »CulpepperJosh1638
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:32pmCome Monday, the interview will be viewed by us. What a damn shame. Letting someone with power scare you into reporting the truth. If this turns out to be like Osamas tape that “exists” that we never get to see. You sirs will never get a cable subscription from me again that is for sure. Stop SOPA & PIPA! Internets our last bastion.
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:32pmToo bad Romney will not get this aggresive against Obama. That is why we should nominate a fighter (that fights democrats).
Report Post »IMPEACHBHO
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 6:44pmGLOVES OFF! Time to strike back. BHO has more dirt than Kansas and all the Republicans combined.
Report Post »LANE131
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:32pmIs she being paid off in some way by the Obama’s? Because if it is MITT and Obama, Obama will WIN i fear.
Report Post »Oh if it is Obama and Gingrich, Obama still will WIN i fear, obama will just have to work a little harder at it.
You had winners in Palin (yes i know she’s not running) Bachman and Cain, but you casted then aside, or/and let dirty tricks and the press drive them out, you could not stand up to even that, and for that you may lose your country, your American forever.
Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:30pmYes even Glenn would not defend Cain when he could have. Now it seems to be false even according to the accuser. We need people of courage to STAND who have the power to do so.
I may be wrong but it seems that Glenn is backdooring Mitt into office. And maybe it is just because he is Mormon. Maybe I am wrong. I hope so.
Report Post »jpndhouse
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:53amWhy don’t we use objective FACTS when making claims. In all national polls, only Mitt Romney beats Obama. The others are not even close…. Romney would win the moderate vote, Gingrich would not.
Report Post »ADNIL
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:19amFor some reason, it sure seems as if Mitt has already been “chosen” to win the nomination. He appears too soft, to me, to stand up in a debate with Barry. And if by some chance he did win the election, IMHO, it would be more of the same, old money and croney politics. The NWO wins either way and we lose.
Vote for the Constitution. Vote Ron Paul 2012. God save the USA from tyranny.
Report Post »BetterDays
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:31pmOh oh, that couldn’t be his socialist ties to Obama would it, really Newt, get out! it’s not news your a utopian tool anyway.
Report Post »AmericanWoman
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:31pmLet the games continue…. funny…wonder when the “bombshell” is gonna drop against Romney? Bet NOT …he is the established gop’s golden boy.
Report Post »ADNIL
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:26am“October surprise”
Report Post »bloodrage
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:31pmNo matter what it is, Newt’s ego will play a major role in the story. His ego is the largest stumbling block to my unwavering support.
Report Post »eyestoseeearstohear
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:31pmThey are pulling another Herman Cain ATTACK, huh?
Report Post »ADNIL
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:28amWhy not? It worked once, it will again. Many people are fools for this sort of clap trap.
Report Post »oriondma05
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:30pm****Breaking: Herman Cain supposedly sexually harassed Newt Gingrich. No proof but we’ll run with it!
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:31pmRomney is DIRTY. Here’s more proof.
Report Post »Glenn how do you like your guy Romney now?
BrotherWill
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:35pmLol. Awesome!
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:35pmLooking back Romney may have been behind the Cain defimation too.
Report Post »eyestoseeearstohear
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:36pmExactly!
It worked with Herman – so I guess they will try it again, huh?
Report Post »Faith1029
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:37pmThe fact that his Ex is contemplating ruining him speaks volumes about her and I wouldn’t listen to what she had to say because it looks like a woman scorned. If he had children with her, they must be very proud of her that she would do this to their father. Wonder how much they’re paying her? Wow, some people are just plain evil.
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:04pmPatrick, do you even listen to Glenn Beck? He reiterates every single day that Santorum is his guy.
Report Post »booger71
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:10pmNothing more vindictive than a ex-wife
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:45pm@FreedomPurveyor
Report Post »Yes I listen very often. Glenn has knocked down #1 or#2 (that were not Romney) time and again. ABR supporters prop up #2. Glenn always goes for #4 or so. First it was Perry, Cain, Gingrich, Paul in NH, then Gingrich again.
He is back dorring Romney in My view. I hope I am wrong but usually am not on things like this.
READRIGHTHERE
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:18pm@ Patrick. It must be because Glenn is Mormon, just like Romney. Yeah! And although Glen has bet his career and his future on his ability to be trusted by his fans, he is hoping against hope that he can maintain his credibility while still assisting Romney, without anyone being able to detect it, with winning the Republican nomination. And this makes perfect sense because, as everyone knows, Mormons stick together in a crisis, and secretly aspire to rule the world with a Muslim like Caliphate wherein the Prophet of the church will have a chance to veer away from encouraging repentance from sin and espousing good virtues, and get down to the real business at hand, which is running the Free World via his own Manchurian candidate in the Oval Office. And this will all be accomplished by the mass conversion of every malleable, spineless, American destined to place their faith in Romney’s church. Everybody is doomed to wear matching underwear! The whole doctrine of free agency espoused by the church is of course a calculated ruse to lull the world into a trance like coma of trusting that no one could possibly have those kind of evil intentions, especially the Mormons. They have such wonderful commercials! Who would have thunk it? And to think that the whole Harry Reid incident was calculated to convince Americans that somehow the church did not have such a plan as this… Really?
Report Post »Toxic Pirate
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:14amHenery your and idiot , Beck supports Santorum and we all should too, he’s the only one telling the TRUTH!
Report Post »evglassett
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:28pmIts really sad that we are now waiting for a “Bombshell” to be dropped to see the end of a man’s career. While I”m not a Gingrich supporter, I still don‘t revel in or want to see a man’s be put on display like that. Politics is so nasty and dirty, no wonder there are no “good” politicians or trustworthy people in politics.
Report Post »OutOfTheAether
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:34pmFor sure. When it come to Politics, there’s no such thing as water under the bridge – it gets recycled
Report Post »dukielouie
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:40pmThis is for the American Idiots who refuse to do there homework on the candidates.Newt wrote the forward to AlvinToffler“The Third Wave” where the author talks about a new government for America.Biil Clinton and Al Gore are both supporters of this book. Watch Newt interveiw Alvin on Cspan. Is Newt a true conservative. Will he keep his promise on getting us out of Un Agneda 21 and Sustainable development policies. He did promise the Tea Party Coordinators like myself. What to believe? Let’s not forget Romney who signed into law all these sustainable development policies in Mass. Does he support Un Agenda 21? He will not come near any 912/Tea groups. Are these men Globalist Republicans? You Decide GOOGLE
Report Post »diablamonkey
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:28pmso why are we surprised on this one- another attempt to get rid of the candidates the media don‘t want and give us the candidate we don’t want-
Report Post »READRIGHTHERE
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:23pmDon’t you think Newt would be easier to defeat than even Ron Paul? There is too much dirt, cobwebs, and lime dust in Newt’s closet. If I were a betting lefty I would push whatever buttons I had to keep Newt in and hopefully even deliver him the nomination, because that would hands down guarantee the win for my pal Obama. But I am not a lefty and couldn’t be more irritated at the dote for creating this mess in the first place. Mr. Speaker, sit down for a while and work on writing your next book, “How a Selfish Capitalist Ruined My World!”
Report Post »kentuckypatriot
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:27pmSounds alot like the hos who damaged Herman Cain. Just gotta have that 15 minutes of fame. Where is the devil herself, Gloria Albright?
Report Post »Twobyfour
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:44pmThad would be Gloria Redthroughandthrough (Allred).
You confusing her with Madeline Notsobright.
Well, both are hags, so your confusion is excusable.
Report Post »Oraclevoiceofreason
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:26pmunethical? thats a switch
Report Post »ReaganBaby
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:26pmhow much more dirt do we need before people realize Newt is a lying cheat who will sell his mother to get ahead. The Guy is not right, Wake up Tea Party the man is everything we are trying to remove from government
Report Post »WaitOneMinute
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:35pmAgree, the picture looks like they deserve each other.
Report Post »playbes
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:26pmBeware a Woman Scorned…
Report Post »OutOfTheAether
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:28pmand how!
Report Post »Twobyfour
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 9:03pmHow doesn’t matter. Them x-wives remember minute details one has long forgotten and reinterpret everything to make you a supervilain they can hate without bounds. It’s wired.
Report Post »javasport
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:25pmThe only ethics ABC is debating is whether they wait till he wins the nomination.
Report Post »KangarooJack
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:23pm‘Welcome to Mooseport’
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:23pmkeyword: EX-WIFE.
Report Post »Echelon
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:22pmNewt is really a transsexual :-)
Report Post »BatesclanMary
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:34pmThat was my first thought!
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:05amHe was born Olivia Newton Gingrich.
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:22pmin other words, just a spoiled and bitter EXWIFE who seeks to destroy the exhusband (and his happy marriage who now has an account at Tiffany’s.) ..and she is being well-paid with money and 15 minutes of fame by george soros to say anything that would destroy any 100% AMERICAN republican candidate. to Hell with her.
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:34pmShe is being paid by Romney. Soros would wait until October.
Report Post »Luke611
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:42pmIs this the ex-wife he asked for a divorce while she was in the hospital with cancer? Or is this the ex-wife he was having the affair with while #1 was in the hospital,….who he divorced to marry #3; Calista who was another Monika Lewinsky “intern”.
Report Post »Twobyfour
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 9:13pmPatrick Henry II, why would Soros wait? Why not preselect the GOP candidate, to deal with known known? Soros has been always proactive in his mischief.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:22pmIs Newt really a woman? could that be it?
Report Post »TABeav
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:32pmAccording S.E. Cupp he is!
Report Post »OutOfTheAether
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:32pmNah. Maybe it’s that Newt was actually born in Switzerland or something. Who knew!
Report Post »justangry
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:35pmHe does seem to have pms a lot.
Report Post »Todd P
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:56pm…it WOULD explain the hair.
Report Post »texrubarts
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 9:35pmI think S.E. Cupp is so into Rick Santorum – it is not even funny!!! LOL… I think Newt’s ex is so jealous that this new wife could be in the white house and she can NOT accept it!!! I hope it back fires on her!! If Newt is paying her alimony maybe he can take it away… serve her right!!!
S.E. is set out to destroy Newt – she HATES him because Newt is better than her Santorum!!!!
Report Post »