Extreme Flipping: See the House Bought for $1, Renovated, and Marketed for $145K
- Posted on August 10, 2012 at 7:35am by
Liz Klimas
- Print »
- Email »
One can only imagine what the state of a home selling for $1 would be. A Minneapolis house that sold for just that had maggots living in the refrigerator, cockroaches in the oven and was generally unsafe as a living space.

The house before its renovation (Image: Google maps)

(Image: CBS Local screenshot)
All it took to bring the home back to life was $100,000, three months of working 76 hours a week, countless volunteers and the magic that only cable TV can do. The home at 3049 Third Ave. S., which CBS Local reports was actually caving in, is now on the market for $145,000.

(Image: CBS Local screenshot)

(Image: CBS Local screenshot)
Thanks to the work done by the DIY Network’s “Rehab Addict” hosted by Nicole Curtis, the house was raised up four feet, is presentable and safe to inhabit.
“People drive by this house all day long and just scream, ‘Thank you,’” Curtis said according to CBS Local. “It was all about giving back to this community, and turning this house from the biggest eye sore into a beautiful corner piece.”
Watch the report for a first look at the new home:
According to the show’s website, Curtis works specifically historic homes in Minneapolis and Detroit that have “fallen on hard times.”





















Submitting your tip... please wait!
RonFromSeattle
Posted on August 28, 2012 at 1:32amMany negative comments here. Too bad. For those crunching the dollars I say this: If you don‘t think it’s a good deal to be involved in, that’s fine. No one is asking you to invest in a house like this. Or to spend one red cent on such a project. But the point is it’s a beautiful historic house now that was restored. Instead of being torn down. And that neighborhood is the better for it. And I know for a fact, that Nicole does great work. So I say bravo Nicole! Nice job.
Report Post »estilo1622
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 3:31pmhere is another great house flip , this house was in horrible shape check out the video
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4y_3BVV3RDo
HongKongCavalier
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 11:46amNeat but not encouraging for the for-profit home flipper.
$44,999 of profit for three months of 76 hour weeks isn’t much unless it was one or two people doing the work. Because now you have to pay the realtor 5%, any property taxes incurred during the sales process, etc. Let‘s say it’s a three man crew that takes home $36K post sale. Sorry, but $12K for three months of double time isn’t all that great, and you tied up $100K for 3+ months. And your next flip project might break even or lose $.
Report Post »Suzanne D
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 2:05pmAre you completely out of your mind?! In this economy, there are MANY people who would love to take home $12k for three months of intensive work. Your answer shows you are out of touch with reality.
Report Post »Suzanne D
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 2:07pmOh, and read the article again. They didn’t tie up $100k for three months … they tied up ONE DOLLAR for three months!
Report Post »yiddishlion
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 2:37pmApparently finance is not your strong suit.
Report Post »Constantine Ivanov
Posted on August 11, 2012 at 5:54pm@SUZANNE D
“They didn’t tie up $100k for three months … they tied up ONE DOLLAR for three months!” you said.
Read the article again:
“All it took to bring the home back to life was $100,000, three months of working 76 hours a week, countless volunteers”
If it is not “tied up $100 for 3 months,” what is it?
$100,000 the new owner(s) spent on the renovation/restoration, were not available for anything else = aka TIED UP.
Report Post »But you’re right: even this small profit is still good in the obama times.
Detroit paperboy
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 11:27amHe DID ENT do it on his own, he DID ENT do that,,,,some Obama voting crackhead FOODSTAMPERS helped him…….cuz they are probably the one that destroyed it, and if they didn’t destroy he could not have renovated it……
Report Post »Want our country back
Posted on August 12, 2012 at 5:55pmhahahahaha
Report Post »bryguy84
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 10:29amNice job
Report Post »Emerson7
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 10:24amYou’re doing a great public service if you take a house that should be torn down and renovate it for whatever profit you can.
Report Post »woodyee
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 8:51amMaybe she’s only breaking even or a little ahead, but I wish we had one million more citizens like Nicole and her work ethic. She is also a single mom – what a WOMAN!
Quite the contrast to what Obammy and his acolytes would demand of her…”Erah*, you’re a Wall Street facist, erah…why don’t you just sign up for welfare, WIC, Section 8, and do what nearly 20 million Obammy voters are doing erah?
*erah – in deference to the dead Ted Kennedy, may his corpse be rotted and his soul continue burning…
Report Post »T-2
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 8:43amI watch that show. Nicole Curtis is a cutie. That single mom is more productive in one hour than Barry in his entire life.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 8:21amYou didn’t build that.
Report Post »Bum thrower
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 8:27amNeed to check and see if Elizabeth Warren was involve in this RE deal!!
Report Post »Thatsitivehadenough
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 8:50amNot bad, but that voice has got to go.
Report Post »floridareader
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 9:14amditto
Report Post »ThePostman
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 8:08amThat doesn’t sound like a very good deal at all! People should make sound financial decisions. If the property wasn’t worth renovating, it should have been bulldozed. 1$+$100,000+76hours*4 weeks*10$/hr*3wks/mo = $107,501. Given that the house will likely sell for 130K, a profit of 20K on a 100K investment over 3 months comes out to 80% “APR”. That’s good, at 10 smackers an hour, and if the house sells instantly, not in the 9 month average (brings it back to 20% APR), but if one expects to make 20 smackers an hour, the deal is just about a wash, a 15K profit on a 115K investment – <15%.
Still, this shows how bad the stock market is as an investment – you cannot make anywhere near these returns on Wall Street these days, unless you pick and choose carefully. And I'd say 1 dollar for a house is picking and choosing carefully.
Still, the lot alone would be worth 20K at least, and the buyers could have bulldozed the house (2K), flipped the lot for 20K in a month, and pocketed a 1000% return on their investment.
Report Post »DetritusScreener
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 8:56amI agree with you, it should have been bulldozed. The finished, refurbished house looks nice but was impractical. It could have been bulldozed, had a contractor come in and put up a new modern, efficient house for the money.
Report Post »Jim44
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 7:48pm“Still, the lot alone would be worth 20K at least”
Report Post »You know this HOW ????
and the buyers could have bulldozed the house (2K)
2K ????? (smiles) More likely 5-7K in most area’s…
“flipped the lot for 20K in a month”
Do you really think that if the lot was worth 20K no one else would not have actually thought of that ??? And to think in the current market that now vacant lot would turn over for that price in 1 month!!! Really ?
And where else could someone get that return on an investment in that short amount of time ???… Whats paying 15 % on the Dollar ..for a less than 1 year investment ????
Jim44
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 9:00pmDetritusScreener
Report Post »Might I as someone that works in this field … Suggest a few things??
You say …”.It could have been bulldozed, had a contractor come in and put up a new modern, efficient house for the money.”
How about a few things that you might not have thought about …
‘A houses value is based on its location even more than the structure itself… I have built the exact same home in different Subdivisions and they have an amazing price difference ..
Subdivisions and Neighborhoods were normally built at a like time and are of like design and construction… Thus keeping their value relative to each other.. Siimilar .
By Demo-ing and building a Modern House in a established neighborhood . You are changing the entire dynamic of that Street… It effects the values of every house in that area …And in many cases causes a trend ..Tear them down and use the lots to build new houses .
Sounds good ? What about the home owner that doesn’t want to do that ? If the house on the Left and the House on the Right are now NEW Modern homes and you are still the older style home . YOU are in some peoples eyes causing their property to LOSE values.
Or you just drove up the value of the property of the person that has lived there for years and now their Property Taxes go up drastically . Possibly making it no longer within their budget….
We humans also have homes that are in an ECO System.. Based on property values and Tax bases…
Unintended Consequences..Thi
huey6367
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 8:08amThis goes to show that with a little hard work you can make money. And, oddly, the government wasn’t involved.
Report Post »teddrunk
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 7:53amWatch who ends up buying under some government program and come back and look at it in 5 years.
Report Post »Unbelievable
Posted on August 10, 2012 at 7:52amWowwee Yowwee… It looks amazing!
Report Post »