Media

Fake Op-Ed Dupes NYTimes Writer and Others Over the Weekend: So Here‘s ’How to Spot a Hoax’

On Saturday, an op-ed appearing to be written by Bill Keller — former Executive Editor for the New York Times who is currently a writer — defending Wikileaks in an effort to defend journalists’ rights appeared on the New York Times online. Or so it seemed. The story itself appeared to have been tweeted from Keller’s account. It was then tweeted by another New York Times writer and others. From there it snowballed, as things on social media often do.

What Are the Lessons Learned From Bill Kellers Fake New York Times Op Ed Incident?

Screenshot of the fake New York Times op-ed allegedly by Bill Keller but later revealed to be penned by Wikileaks.

Thanks to a strongly worded tweet — literally, it was in all caps — from Keller within 24 hours, the op-ed was revealed as a hoax, for which Wikileaks later claimed responsibility. Read the full fake op-ed here.

As Craig Silverman on Poynter writes this hoax was planned, well plotted and, as a result, successfully executed. That said, he calls this incident an “emerging form of social hoax.” Silverman points to Josh Stearns’ piece on Storify showing how it all played out. Stearns chronologically curated the tweets of the news spreading on major news sources, including by the Times’ Nick Bilton. Stearns then shows Keller’s statement on the piece and the cascade of corrections that followed (see below):

What Are the Lessons Learned From Bill Kellers Fake New York Times Op Ed Incident?

Tweets spreading the fake op-ed. (Image via Josh Stearns/Storify)

What Are the Lessons Learned From Bill Kellers Fake New York Times Op Ed Incident?

Setting the record straight about the fake op-ed. (Image via Josh Stearns/Storify)

Although Gizmodo writes the op-ed was “realistic,” others like Venture Beat call it “terribly written” and not up to Keller’s par. Still, many were fooled. As Stearns and others point out though, when you take a closer look at other elements surrounding the piece and how it may have gotten started, the hoax is revealed. Take the Twitter account issued the first tweet about the fake editorial, for example. It was posted by @nytkeIler. At first glance, this may look like Bill Keller’s actually twitter account, but an “l” is in fact an uppercase “I”. Stearns also includes that some have looked into the backend code on the “New York Times op-ed page” where the article appeared and found clues there as well. The URL itself is telling too (see below).

What Are the Lessons Learned From Bill Kellers Fake New York Times Op Ed Incident?

URL for the fake New York Times opinion page.

What Are the Lessons Learned From Bill Kellers Fake New York Times Op Ed Incident?

Here's how the real New York Times opinion page URL would look.

Check out Stearns’ full post on Storify for more details on how the hoax was revealed here.

Silverman wants others to be ready to tell fact from fiction. Check out his presentation on “how to spot a hoax”:

Comments (17)

  • LaptopRepairData
    Posted on July 31, 2012 at 1:28pm

    Excellent Topic

    Report Post »  
  • shanis78
    Posted on July 30, 2012 at 10:30pm

    Now that is funny!!

    Report Post »  
  • jungle J
    Posted on July 30, 2012 at 8:58pm

    the mentally ill have taken over…only the sane understand how dangerous they are to freedom and libert.y..

    Report Post »  
  • drphil69
    Posted on July 30, 2012 at 2:45pm

    ROTFLMAO… gee, the NYTimes staff is too lazy to check with one of their own writers? What a surprise!!

    FACTS? WE DONT NEED NO STINKING FACTS!!

    Report Post »  
  • BryanB
    Posted on July 30, 2012 at 2:37pm

    I tell you right now you have a problem on the Blaze, with Editors and Journalist from AOL Patch and The Huffington Post, just to name a few, Trolling the Blaze……….

    Report Post » BryanB  
  • Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
    Posted on July 30, 2012 at 2:35pm

    They should have know it was a fake right away, there wasn’t any misspelled words, errors, and was pretty much a coherent article. At that point they should have questioned it.

    Report Post » Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra  
  • 00gabooga
    Posted on July 30, 2012 at 2:30pm

    Here is the guideline for their research department.

    Does it make the left look good? ——-> YES ——–> Run it.
    |
    |
    NO ———-> Don’t run it.

    Report Post » 00gabooga  
  • AvengerK
    Posted on July 30, 2012 at 2:20pm

    Ah yes..another example of the dogged investigative reporting of today’s media.

    Report Post »  
  • kaydeebeau
    Posted on July 30, 2012 at 2:11pm

    More evidence of the stellar research / verification staff in the legacy media

    Report Post » kaydeebeau  
  • Eric_The_Red_State
    Posted on July 30, 2012 at 2:07pm

    To quote a well known President

    Don’t believe everything you read on the internet.
    - Abraham Lincoln

    Report Post » Eric_The_Red_State  
    • Landon410
      Posted on July 30, 2012 at 2:46pm

      Al Gore made the internest so Abraham Lincoln could make money off of it, and stuff

      Report Post »  
  • GIDEON612
    Posted on July 30, 2012 at 2:04pm

    Well it is pretty easy to tell. If ANYTHING comes from the socialist/progressive movement it is a lie or designed to favor them in the end.

    Report Post » GIDEON612  
  • KyleD
    Posted on July 30, 2012 at 1:55pm

    That’s an obvious fake and anyone remotely techy should have spotted it, certainly the so-called tech editor of the new york times. Bravo, Nick Bolton, for showing your incompetence.

    Report Post »  
  • Wool-Free Vision
    Posted on July 30, 2012 at 1:38pm

    The most delicious irony in this clusterpiece is the fact that the duped alarmist who tweeted the link is Nick Bilton, THE TECHNOLOGY EDITOR of The New York Times. Hahahaha! Incompetence on display at The Times, who woulda thunk it? If ANYONE should have spotted the obviously fake URL, it SHOULD HAVE BEEN the damn Tech Editor who pasted it into his tweet and then pressed send.

    Does the fool not know his own website????

    Report Post » Wool-Free Vision  
    • Wool-Free Vision
      Posted on July 30, 2012 at 1:51pm

      Pardon me. “Technology Editor” should be “NYT Lead Technology Writer” and “NYT Bits Bites Blogger.” The irony is just as thick.

      Report Post » Wool-Free Vision  
    • Wool-Free Vision
      Posted on July 30, 2012 at 3:32pm

      Even more irony: Bilton is currently writing a book called “The Twitter Story,” due to be published in 2013.

      You can’t make this stuff up. It would be hilarious, except for the fact that there are DOZENS of Americans who still take the NYT seriously.

      Report Post » Wool-Free Vision  
  • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
    Posted on July 30, 2012 at 1:27pm

    Here we go again.

    Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In