Government

Flashback: When ‘Job Creation’ Involved ‘Universal Child Care’ and ‘Sitting Home and Eating Bon-Bons’

Trevor Loudon over at NZ Patriot brings us this classic, possibly prophetic, 1997 clip from the National Jobs for All Coalition (which he cites as a “front for the Democratic Socialists of America”) conference.

In the clip, panelist Heidi Hartmann talks about how people at the time were starting to talk about universal health care as well as universal child care. We are very familiar with the health care arguments, but what arguments were they using for universal child care?

“…That in itself could be viewed as a job creation plan,” Hartmann said. In a nutshell the argument is jobs. But what comes before the ellipses is even more shocking. The “that” she’s referring to is this:

“Whether you’re working or not you would have access to child care, you could use it to go to school, you could use it to sit home, eat bon-bons and watch TV, we don’t care. That in itself could be viewed as a job creation plan.”

“Wouldn‘t that solve all of America’s problems?” Loudon asks.

Comments (48)

  • Susan Harkins
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 2:14pm

    Entitlements 101: “Gimmie, Gimmie, Gimmie, because my Mommy always did!”

    Report Post » Susan Harkins  
  • brianleeken
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 2:07pm

    quick!! somebody snatch her happy meal!!

    what a troll

    Report Post »  
  • J.C. McGlynn
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 1:48pm

    You know there is song written some time ago that fits this perfectly. “When you wish upon a star, does not matter who you are, your dreams come true.”

    Report Post » J.C. McGlynn  
  • NHABE64
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 1:00pm

    Heidi is nothing more than an Obama cockroach, a socialist who sold her soul to George Soros or some other bum to disgrace herself and betray America. She, along with anyone like her should be sentenced to live in a 3rd world country for a year because what this dimwit is talking about would eventually lead us into becoming that 3rd world country. She is a very and stupid human being.

    Report Post »  
  • Flagwaver
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 11:49am

    I’m curious as to when a stay-t-home parent would require daycare for their child?

    Report Post » Flagwaver  
    • teddrunk
      Posted on November 16, 2010 at 12:30pm

      When it’s child indoctrination time. Don’t want those mother actually teaching children any of
      her values and morals.

      Report Post »  
  • powhatan
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 11:20am

    Child care…..? Why not just take people’s children from them at birth to raise perfect little commies…that is what they want anyway…..Snakey Snakey people…

    Report Post » powhatan  
  • lfdibble
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 11:20am

    It’s really hard to comprehend how these people do not see that these things can end up failing when they run out of money. Once everyone is on the government dole who pays for these entitlements? Is it then the collapse of this great nation?

    Report Post » lfdibble  
  • WHATWOULDPATTONDO
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 10:45am

    How is eating bon bons a job?

    Report Post » WHATWOULDPATTONDO  
  • brooksjk
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 10:34am

    Check out updates at The Immaculate Conservative!

    The Intolerant, Gay Left
    Being President is Hard! 
    Obama in Bed with GE and GM (aka Fascist Economic Planning)
    Viva La Arizona!!!!
    American Hubris?: America may be the first nation to die for a lack of hubris…..

    http://www.joebrooks.webs.com

    Report Post » brooksjk  
  • vorpal
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 10:33am

    was medical marijuana legal then?
    I’m thinking that either drugs or a chemical deficiency might be responsible for this wacky thought process….NO WAIT…I‘ll bet it’s genetic – they can’t help themselves…they were born this way!!!!!!

    Report Post » vorpal  
  • zagfan
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 10:19am

    Now the nanny state has come full circle…they really want to provide nannies! Are you kidding me? This is about the most ridiculous idea they have come up with!

    I have an idea, if they are going to give these welfare takers a nanny then they must work or volunteer for 40 hours a week or they don’t get a check. Also, track down daddy and put him on the same plan. Fire the overpaid government workers and put these slugs to work mowing park lawns, cleaning public toilets, removing snow, remodeling buildings into decent apartments and redoing section 8 housing for the check and the nanny they are receiving on my tax dollar.

    They wonder why the U.S. budget is bloated..entitlements like this are the reason. They only talk of cutting back on Social Security and Medicare that people have actually worked and payed into but never ever do they mention the slugs getting paid for having kids with out responsibility.

    Report Post » zagfan  
  • GrumpyCat
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 10:16am

    She was saying, “Yes, please stay at home and eat bon-bons while we brainwash your children.”

    Report Post »  
  • felina g
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 10:01am

    Read “Broke”. Ayn Rand test pg 225.

    “At who`s expense”?

    Report Post »  
  • Sinista Mace
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 10:00am

    Wow.

    I’m having a hard time remembering something as stupid as her comments.

    Report Post » V-MAN MACE  
  • crossdraw
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 9:57am

    Hey Heidi, I would tell you to blow it out your ass but I see you already do your talking out of your Plus size ass. Maybe you should shut the hell up. Your isiocy,lunacy,stupidity and general lack of intelligence is showing. PISS OFF TUBBY

    Report Post »  
  • heavyduty
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 9:39am

    You just can’t fix stupid.

    Report Post »  
  • bookofwisdom
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 9:38am

    So, this is new? There are lots of kids out there right now with kids of their own who are living off the “system”. You and I are paying for them to stay home and teach their kids to hate those who have a little and are giving to them. What would be new would be to have all those “able bodied people” who are on welfare, well, cut off their welfare and make them go to work. May God Bless.

    Report Post » bookofwisdom  
  • seeker9
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 9:36am

    Wow! I am speechless. Why not progress a step and just hand out free money?

    Report Post » seeker9  
    • chickenlittle
      Posted on November 16, 2010 at 9:40am

      That’s what they are doing… if you count the money that you paid in taxes.

      Report Post » chickenlittle  
    • seeker9
      Posted on November 16, 2010 at 10:42am

      Oh! I get it. The Bon-Bon eaters get counted as employed, thus reducing the unemployment rate. Higher taxes will be needed to subsidize their pay. Voila! Redistribution with low unemployment! Utopia! (Until the country goes broke).

      Report Post » seeker9  
  • MidwestMomof3
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 9:34am

    Boy, that really chaps my hide. Our decision for me to stay home and raise our children up to school age is a *huge* burden on us financially that we gladly take on because it‘s what’s best for our children. We ask for no help as we struggle to make ends meet. For someone to talk about sitting around eating bon bons as “working” and trivializing the job at-home moms do just ticks me off!

    Report Post » MidwestMomof3  
  • klevalt
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 9:32am

    It’s already here.

    Report Post » klevalt  
  • booger71
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 9:32am

    By the look of her, she has had more than her “fair” share of bon-bons

    Report Post » booger71  
    • davecoolworld
      Posted on November 16, 2010 at 9:44am

      Hahaha…she wishes for more.

      Christie/Rubio 2011

      Report Post » davecoolworld  
    • drbage
      Posted on November 16, 2010 at 10:38am

      She’d better watch out, the arbitrer of fatness, Marc Lamont-Hill, will soon be on her case. Love to ask her what would happen if everyone decided to sit at home and eat bon-bons. What would Moochelle say?

      Report Post »  
    • untameable-kate
      Posted on November 16, 2010 at 1:25pm

      The farther left one travels the farther they downward they travel on the uggo scale.

      Report Post » Untameable-kate  
  • seanpatriot
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 9:29am

    Eliminating all liberals in America would solve Americas problems

    Report Post » seanpatriot  
  • HouseNegro
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 9:29am

    Or we could just wish for a job in one hand and crap in the other. See which one fills up first…..

    Report Post » SpankDaMonkey  
  • GeeWhiz
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 9:28am

    That’s a serious amount of stupid, consolidated in one human being’s opinion.

    Report Post »  
    • chickenlittle
      Posted on November 16, 2010 at 10:56am

      “Human being?” I’m not strong on biology, but since when did leeches classify as human?

      Report Post » chickenlittle  
  • john seven eighteen
    Posted on November 16, 2010 at 9:27am

    “,,,you could use it to sit home, eat bon-bons and watch TV…” because there are plenty of hard-working citizens out there who are making way more than their share and we’ll just take their money and give it to you. Why shouldn’t you be entiltled to your fair shair. Don’t worry, lazy welfare peeps, we’ll take care of you, just vote for us, k?

    Report Post » john seven eighteen  
    • snowleopard3200 {mix art}
      Posted on November 16, 2010 at 9:34am

      Just vote for them, nah, let us put them out of a job permanently, and then show them the true value of hard work that most Americans (90%+) actually do. This is from working and raising a family, to those who own part/fully a business and support other people while pursuing the freedoms to chase the dream of prosperity.

      Only a Progressive would see sitting around and eating cupcakes and bon-bons all day as a form of Job creation (unless it means being a food taster for the Progressive office holder; make sure you are given generous life insurance terms too).

      Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • Polwatcher
      Posted on November 16, 2010 at 10:41am

      Thieves will justify their actions any way they can. They don’t know or care what the truth really is. Today we have thieves in high places and with arguments that are still a con job just as they always were.

      Report Post »  
    • Rogue
      Posted on November 16, 2010 at 10:47am

      Hmm.. I wonder what these socialist daycare programs will be teaching your young children while you are at home sitting on the couch. Yet another way to indoctrinate young kids, and at the same time, take parenting out of the equation.

      Personal responsibility cannot coexist with dependence on the government, and must be phased out, it seems.

      Report Post » Rogue  
    • Peters
      Posted on November 16, 2010 at 10:49am

      You know . . . the real problem here isn’t really what she’s saying. Well, it is; the socialism that she’s talking about is a real problem; but that aside, the real seriousness here is the level of conviction and authority that she speaks with when talking about stealing people’s money, calling it a tax.

      What is it in liberal’s brains that allow them to confuse this “feeling” of empathy, that their looking out for the poor and disadvantaged, equates to justifiable theft of other’s money and property?

      Or is it much simpler than that? Perhaps she, and all socialist liberals, they really know that stealing is morally wrong. Perhaps they do; but they also know that it looks a lot better when you do it under the disguise of charity.

      And then, consider the profound clarity in which she speaks it all with, that she does it with conviction in her demeanor; she simply believes her own lies as a mechanism that recruits others to join her in her “feelings” of empathy. This is a level of narcissism that is essentially liberalism on display, and for us all to see. It balances and pivots on rationalizations that always can be deduced to contradictions in thought and philosophy. But dangerously, make no mistake about it; she will also feign the conviction that you, because you do not share in her feelings of empathy by allowing her to steal your money, it is you that are evil and corrupt.

      And in that, they are thieves . . . they are wholly dishonest . . . they are corrupt . . . they are clandestine. They are the Democratic Party . . . they are socialists only in search of power.

      Report Post »  
    • Beckofile
      Posted on November 16, 2010 at 11:25am

      Back to the well and learn about this country. Please watch Dennis Praeger explain our problems. Send the video to all those who have children so that they can learn and pass the torch.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=XNUc8nuo7HI

      Report Post » Beckofile  
    • untameable-kate
      Posted on November 16, 2010 at 12:49pm

      I would be OK with universal childcare if it meant that we eliminate welfare and food stamps at the same time. I know that it was very hard for me to get by when I had one kid in day care at a cost of about $360 per month. The women who have more than one child spends over half her income on daycare, assuming she makes over minimum wage. Give daycare but eliminate welfare now nobody has an excuse to sit home eating bon bons and give the chance for a mother to be able to afford to go to work. It would be a lot less costly to the taxpayer.

      Report Post » Untameable-kate  
    • liesnomore
      Posted on November 16, 2010 at 7:08pm

      The same argumant can be made for the “free breakfast” and “free lunch” programs.
      “Can’t use your food stamps to by a $2.80 box of Oatmeal that would feed your child breakfast for a week, because we know you are too damn lazy to get out of the bed to boil the water. Just send your precious one here for the deep fried brad we call french toast…we’ll take care of everything”

      Report Post »  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In