‘Floridians Are Going to Have to Start Pulling up Their Pants and Stop Having Sex with Animals’
- Posted on May 6, 2011 at 9:46am by
Emily Esfahani Smith
- Print »
- Email »
In the words of MSNBC’s Brian Hamacher: “Floridians are going to have to start pulling up their pants and stop having sex with animals soon.”
It’s up to Gov. Rick Scott to sign off on two bills passed in the Florida Senate and House Wednesday which target droopy drawers and bestiality.
The bestiality bill (SB 344) bans sexual activity between humans and animals and has been championed for years by Sen. Nan Rich, from Sunrise.
Rich took up the anti-bestiality fight after a number of cases involving sexual activity with animals in recent years, including a Panhandle man who was suspected of accidentally asphyxiating a family goat during a sex act and the abuse of a horse in the Keys. The bill would make such acts a first-degree misdemeanor.
Also passed by the House and Senate Wednesday is the so-called “droopy drawers bill” (SB 228), will will force students to hike up their pants while at school.
Students caught showing their underwear or butt crack could face suspensions and other punishments.






















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Ghandi was a Republican
Posted on May 8, 2011 at 4:08pmLeave ‘em bee- It inhibits crime because they can’t run away…
Report Post »And i would rather pervs have sex with goats than children, or procreate with females in general, for that matter… Sometimes you just gotta leave well enough alone.
EdBoo
Posted on May 7, 2011 at 9:14amIf some guy wants to get off with a goat or horse who cares? Better that than killing and eating them. The state/country has enough problems to worry about.
The low pants issue is another matter altogether. These guys are the low-life of the minority communities. They can’t spell, read or write but have all the gang gestures down pat. Duh!
Like their embarrassing parents (probably just a single parent) they are poor, left uneducated by ghetto-level teachers and easily swayed to find some way to make sense out a miserable existence.
Report Post »Restaurant Run by Retired Kings
Posted on May 7, 2011 at 1:17amLets not forget about the strangled goat.
Report Post »EZDOZIT
Posted on May 7, 2011 at 1:16amDoes this go for pumbers too?
Report Post »EZDOZIT
Posted on May 7, 2011 at 1:16amAdd your comments
Report Post »EZDOZIT
Posted on May 7, 2011 at 1:15amYou ever try to out run a drive by shooting with your pants around your knees? Boys from the hood,idiots!
Report Post »Voice-O-Reason
Posted on May 7, 2011 at 1:14amForcing Stupids to pull up their pants will only have them wearing their boxers on their heads.
Report Post »vietnam298
Posted on May 7, 2011 at 1:13amSo that‘s why the stores in Florida can’t keep those “waist high” rubber boots on the shelves.
Report Post »Restaurant Run by Retired Kings
Posted on May 7, 2011 at 1:10amThank god! Finally something that addresses this fashion aspect!
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on May 7, 2011 at 2:16amWhat is the difference in showing your rear and your front? Nothing…Indecent exposure…I never knew bestiality was such an issue…Freakazoid!
Pull up your pants, Crack kills!
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on May 7, 2011 at 2:20amThe Blaze censored bestiality. SB 344 topic… Even though they say it above… ?
Report Post »zteater
Posted on May 7, 2011 at 3:11amReally? The government has gone from regulating what we wear to HOW we wear it? I don’t agree with the saggy pants, but I still should have the right to do so in a free country.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on May 7, 2011 at 4:19am@Zteater
I usually agree 100% it isn’t governments business… But like I said above, what’s decent about showing your rear? If it’s ok to show your rear on purpose, is it ok to show your front on purpose? Goes to principles…
Principle is it’s indecent to expose yourself, whether front or back…
If one wants to sag, that’s fine, buy jeans made for that, don’t show your rear is my point…
I don’t think Government per say should pass laws fining or incarnation, but I do believe private institutions or Schools etc have right to dictate what’s worn…No shoes, no shirt, no service…Same thing here…Government should enforce that right is my thoughts…Being Government schools though, laws are required… :-(
Report Post »