Following SC Loss, Mitt Heads to Florida to Attack Gingrich’s Record as Speaker: ‘He Resigned after Four Years in Disgrace’
- Posted on January 22, 2012 at 10:56pm by
Christopher Santarelli
- Print »
- Email »

Since finishing a fairly distant second to Newt Gingrich in the South Carolina Republican primary Saturday, and having his Iowa win negated last week, an agressive Mitt Romney has been on the move in Florida. ABC News reports that the former Massachusetts governor attacked the resurgent Gingrich at a rally in Ormond Beach Sunday:
“’Now Speaker Gingrich is also a leader,’ said Romney, speaking to a rally of hundreds in the parking lot of a building supply warehouse. ‘He was a leader for four years, as speaker of the House. At the end of four years it was proven that he was a failed leader and he had to resign in disgrace.
‘I don’t know if you actually knew that,’ Romney said. ‘He resigned after four years in disgrace. He was investigated under an ethics panel and had to make a payment associated with that and then his fellow Republicans, 88 percent of Republicans voted to reprimand Speaker Gingrich. He has not had a record of successful leadership.”
Romney supporter Chris Christie made similar remarks about the former Speaker during an appearance on Meet the Press Sunday, where the New Jersey governor said that Gingrich has already “embarrassed the party.”
The Associated Press reports that Romney’s campaign is pressing reset:
“Romney now turns to Florida at what is possibly the most critical moment of his campaign, after two weeks of sustained attacks from his opponents and a series of self-inflicted errors that erased any notion that he would be able to lock up the nomination quickly by winning this state’s Jan. 31 primary.
‘I’m looking forward to a long campaign,’ Romney said on Fox News. ‘We are selecting the president of the United States. Someone who is going to face ups and downs and real challenges, and I hope that through this process, I can demonstrate that I can take a setback and come back strong.’”
Romney announced during his Fox News Sunday interview that he will release his tax returns for 2010 on Tuesday, along with an estimate for his 2011 returns. Romney’s campaign has been criticized for their handling of the issue, lacking clarity in a response and seeming unprepared for such a request.
“We made a mistake holding off as long as we did,“ Romney said. He defended his previously stated decision to hold off on releasing them until April, but told host Chris Wallace that the issue had become a distraction on the campaign trail.
Back on the offensive in Florida Sunday evening, POLITICO reports that Romney is now calling Gingrich “a failure and a fraud:”
“To cap the riff, Romney brought it back to Florida’s depressed housing market, and the role Freddie Mac, for which Gingrich worked, played in the real estate crash here. And he continued hisdemand that Gingrich release records of the work he did for the housing lender.
‘He’s been working for Freddie Mac, heard of those guys? He said he’s been a historian. I would like him to release his records. What was his work product there? What was he doing at Freddie Mac? Because Freddie Mac figures in very prominently in the fact that people in Florida have seen home values go down – it’s time to turn that around!’”
AP notes that Romney’s strategy on display in Florida shows that he has begun contrasting his experience as a businessman and governor, to the experiences of Gingrich in Congress and as an advisor inside the beltway. Romney has been poking at Gingrich’s character by raising questions about the ethics investigation against Gingrich in the 1990s, when he was House speaker, and suggested that the former Georgia lawmaker was hiding something by refusing to release reams of documents he apparently gave to investigators back then.
AP reports that when Romney was asked Sunday whether character would become an issue, Romney said, “No question.”
“Leadership is the key attribute that people should look for in considering a president,” Romney said, “and character is a big part of leadership, as is vision, sobriety, steadiness.”





















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (79)
thegrassroots
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 8:09amINTERESTING How The Lib Talking Heads Are NOW Saying That BHO Wants To Run Against Newt!
LOL Sure He Does!
That’s BHO Campaigning For Romney!
BHO KNOWS He Can Beat His Stammering, Stumbling, Wishy-Washy, Almost Clone, RomBama!
Report Post »garyM
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 8:27amObama would love to run against Romney, he is made mincemeat out of McCain in 08 and McCain made mincemeat out of Romney in the primary, what else do we need to know! The problem is many people don’t know that history even with the information network we have now, they keep up with politics and they don’t know how to google or research, they usually let some talkshow host do their thinking for them!
Report Post »thegrassroots
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 8:42amBHO Can Only Hope It’s Romney!
BHO KNOWS That Newt’s Coming After Him, And IT WON’T BE PURTY!
BHO IS VERY AFRAID OF NEWT! As He Should Be!
NEWT 2012
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 4:29pmObama, fav/unfav, 51%/46%, +5
Report Post »Romney, fav/unfav, 45%/38%, +7
Gingrich, fav/unfav, 27%/56%, -29
thegrassroots
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 7:49amNEWT’S RIGHT!
Romney IS Dancing On Eggs, Trying To Figure Out Which Version Of Romney Works!
That‘s Romney’s Whole Campaign M.O.! THAT And Firing Smear Guns!
NEWT 2012
Report Post »disenlightened
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 8:58amMitt is being kind to Newt. Newt was tossed out on his rear end in a mutiny like Captain Bligh before him.
Report Post »thegrassroots
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 7:32amBY HIS OWN WORDS, Romney Admits He’s Resorting To Playing The Character Assassination Card!
How “Presidential” Of Him! How Desperate Of Him!
The “Character Assassination” card is right out of the DumDem PlayBook = One Of BHO’s Favorites!
Fire Away Romney! The More The Smear Guns Come Out = The More America Ignores You!
NEWT 2012
Report Post »whereareyourbrains
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 7:09amFox is doing him no justice. He comes across as a little boy fighting with the neighborhood kid.
Report Post »He sucks………………..period. I want someone with more fire in their BIG belly………….
whereareyourbrains
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 7:07amRomney bots….guess what Romneycare is all you need to say. He is not a conservative and because he saved jobs for some companies does not make him the solution for getting jobs in America. I thought everyone is fed up with CEO people. Romney couldn’t beat MCain and now he is out there again doing his whining…the people in S.C. saw more than just one speech to a news journalist…he didn’t get all those votes because he told off the journalist asking a question…but he did hit a nerve. Most realize………if you can’t win the first time…maybe the second time is no better.
Report Post »Simonne
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 5:21amGood because it’s about time Romney attacks him on his lack of character. Newt has many skeletons in his closet.
Report Post »thegrassroots
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 8:19amJust Watch Romney’s Smear Guns BackFire And Splatter All Over Romney!
Character Assassination Is The Desperate, Last Ditch Effort Of A Very Weak and Whiney and Cowardly Man! Romeny Is Revealing An Extreme Lacking Of A Moral Compass!
Florida’s Too Smart To Fall For It! America’s Fed UpWith It! = Romney’s Shot Himself In The Foot = Again!
Report Post »fatjack
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 11:18amMitt would be wise to let the fat guy from Jersey debate for him.
Report Post »GETLIFE
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 4:22amThis time around, those undecided between Obama and his future opponent are just plain not paying attention. They will surely tune into the msm when they get around to thinking politics. Who handles the media better?
Report Post »waspanglosaxon
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 4:18amIf Congressman Wiener and the former Gov. of NY were forced to resign due to their much less serious sex scandals, why is a reprobate like Gingrich even in the race? More to the point, how could anyone possibly cast their vote for him?
Report Post »thegrassroots
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 8:53amMOST Folks Are Smart Enough To IGNORE Romney’s Smear Guns!
South Carolina Voted For Newt!
Florida Will Vote For Newt!
I Will Vote For Newt!
NEWT 2012
Report Post »Cagey1
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 9:56amIt’s called Clinton!!!! He infidelity an art form all the libs could live with.
Report Post »waspanglosaxon
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 4:14amIs this off topic or what? Maybe not; possibly one could run into Gingrich on there.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 12:46amDo u know why this primary race is so ugly ? Its cuz whoever wins the Republican nomination is a shoe in for the presidency… Do not doubt me on this, i know for a fact Obama will lose in the same fashion that our national hemmorhoid lost… JIMMY CARTER !!!!!
Report Post »Sol Invictus
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 8:44amYou know it’s getting ugly when people start throwing their shoes in. Saw that in Iraq. If you think the result is a foregone conclusion you’re sadly mistaken. Hopefully see you here in November so you can explain what went wrong.
Report Post »desertspeaks
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 12:44amDon’t let your vote be stolen in 2012, vote by absentee ballot and leave a verifiable paper trail of who voted and for whom the vote was cast.
Report Post »Computerized voting machines have been, are being and most likely will be stealing votes in the coming election.
Vote by Absentee Ballot!!!!
Ghandi was a Republican
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 12:30amI’m starting to really dislike Romney. His staff is the pits. I remember when Newt fired them and they went to Romney. Newt did not want to run a negative campaign. This is like sour grapes. Pitiful and unbecoming. Newt can do more for us, and neuter the progs along the way and we better get on board. Newt has been vetted and won 83-0 against the Evil Pelosi!
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 12:45amYO ROMNEY!!!… YOU THINK this type of slam is going to make you more popular?? YOU”RE like a little girl who didn’t get picked for the best fairy part in 3rd grade… spoiled, phony, stammering, passive aggressive… PACK IT UP DUDE….we’re obviously not buying what you and the rest of your INSIDERS are selling…
Report Post »CALL THIS PAYBACK for the small corporations and thousands of jobs you bulled your way through in the 80s making your 200 M fortune… Payback is a bitch, ain’t it?
MS-GlenNBC
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 12:45amGood to review the facts…. GHANDI WAS A REPUBLICAN
The under – less than 20 seconds.
The over.. – more than 2-1/4 hours
I would bet the under and the over tomorrow.
How long it will take Beck to Mention Newt Gingrich in a Negative Fashion. Less than 20 seconds.
The over is how long he will spend on his show trash talking Gingrich. More than 2-1/4 hours.
Report Post »GETLIFE
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 4:07amGingrich and Romney. Both past progressives, both savvy businessmen and politicians.
The debates continue to be a great way to vet the candidates– see how they treat fellow (opposing) politicians, and how they interact with the media.
The one who has the better relationship with the media will have the better chance of beating the media love-child Obama. By this Fall, undecided “independents” can’t be that interested in political analysis, or they wouldn’t be undecided. “Undecideds” are msm watchers. Who handles the media better? And don’t be fooled, John King got exactly what he wanted.
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 5:21amAs we learned from the 2008 campaign, the more desperate Romney gets, the more negative he becomes. This week is the beginning of the 2012 edition of Mitt Romney’s GOP Desperation Express. His negative campaigns are kissing cousins of his positive campaigns in one regard: He’ll say and do anything if he things it will help him get elected.
Report Post »During the 2008 campaign, Romney launched attacks against every one of his major rivals– Mike Huckabee, John McCain, Fred Thompson, Rudy Giuliani. His Republican opponents said of the ads: “distortion,” “hypocrisy,” “lying,” “desperate,” “dishonest,” “simply aren’t true,” and “clear willingness to say and do anything for political gain.” While the Republican candidates disagreed on much, there was a general agreement that Romney’s relentless attacks were unfair.
Many commentators argued that the ads backfired – helping to propel Huckabee and McCain to come-from-behind victories in Iowa and New Hampshire. But in 2008 and 2012, a scorched-earth campaign is the only strategic path for a candidate who has shown for six years that the appeal of his positive message is limited to 25% of Republican primary voters.
It’s not just the negativity of Romney’s attacks that turns off voters, it’s that their message reinforces Romney’s key weakness.
http://www.prioritiesusaaction.org/blog/2011-12-memo-romneys-recurring-negative-campaign
kaydeebeau
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 6:33amHe actually won 84-0 against Pelosi. After the IRS investigation of the 84th charge, the IRS found no violation. Funny how Mittens and the state controlled media think we are too stupid to remember or do the research on our own to find the truth and the whole story.
As speaker, Newt took on the GOP establishment and the Clintons. Guess what always happens to someone with the courage to take on the status quo / elites….character assasination, The difference between now and then is we have other sources of information (thus the reason O wants to regulate the internet) besides the media propoganda machine
Report Post »WhereAreRomeysTaxReturns
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 12:09amBishop Romney’s dirt is slowly being exposed.
The flip flopper is hiding a lot, just like his tax returns and his mega$$$$$$ in the Cayman Islands.
Report Post »martinez012577
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 12:17amRomney is bad, Santorum is worse, Gingrich is the worst. According to Bill Oreilly they are all the same. Which is one of the few things Billy has gotten right lately.
Report Post »MS-GlenNBC
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 12:22amImagine the Primary and debates this year if Romney and Paul were not in the race………
Negative adds are a big part of the Left. Romney and Paul act just like the left. Newt did not post negative adds in Iowa and Romney and Paul acted just like Obama with their negative adds.
The Republicans have two men in the race and the Democrats have 3.
it is Santorum(R) and Gingrich(R) Vs. Obama(D) Romney(D) and Paul(D) (look how they act)
Like the Middle east.
If Paul and Romney left the race tomorrow there would be peace in the Republican primary.
If the Muslims put down their guns there would be peace in the Middle East.
If Israel put down their guns tomorrow there would be no more Jews
If Gingrich stopped attacking Romney there would be no more Gingrich… ( look at Iowa for all you leftists who seek to ignore the facts. Gingrich 41% Romney attack adds Gingrich 15% ish)
IF Glen Beck attacks Gingrich tomorrow instead of promoting Santorum you can say ……
Glenn Beck is not for Santorum but for Romney… Listen Carefully …..
Report Post »ranger22x
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 12:08amMittens= Rino
Report Post »PJL
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:47pmGo for it Mitt, everybody wants to pound on you saying, we have to vet you because there might be things the left will use against you, well Newt has got a ton to crap to shovel through and it really smells.
Report Post »RDG013
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:35pmRomney is a tool. The faction that pushed Newt out as Speaker is now the establishment that is firmly behind Romney and the very people that started the runaway spending ong before the Dems took over Congress! So, Romney wants to be king of the liberal faction of the Rep Party? What a crock!
Report Post »moose8684
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:50pmThe establishment that forced Newt out? He was writing rubber checks, if you or I had done what he was doing we would be in jail.
Report Post »mikenk53
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:59pmMitt only sees disgrace. I see the ending of 40 years of Demoncrats controlling the purse strings of the USA. I hope he can stop it again.
Report Post »KickinBack
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 12:09amI was going to say something similar. If Newt was such an established Republican, why did they chase him out? He may have a shady record of receiving tax payers money, broken marriages (yeah I know two) but he hasn’t been in office in quite a while. Just a couple of months ago, I recall lots of Blazers rooting for a Cain/Newt matchup, until Beck stepped in.
I shouldn’t have to go into a recap as most here know about Mr. Beck’s background, but 15-20 years ago, Mr. Beck was nothing more than an alcoholic who destroyed his marriage and nearly his life because of it, and yet he changed and people listen to him. Perhaps Newt has as well.
If anything, at least Newt is willing to go into the attack, unlike Romney who is always trying to play it safe. Plus, do you notice the MSM going after Mitt? No, they want him to be the Repubs man.
Either way, we’re going to have to support whomever runs against Obama. I’m tired of hearing how we “need a candidate with morales”, well, Obama has none and must be defeated. As for “getting back to the Constitution,” there is the old adage…”You didn’t gain all the weight overnight, you sure aren’t going to lose it overnight.”……Thus ends my longest Blaze post ever. Go Giants.
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 6:34amKickinback,
Attack ads are always controlled by a fearful opposition. Take the hate as a compliment. If they weren’t afraid, they wouldn’t even acknowledge their competition.
Report Post »Romney 2012 top campaign donor: Goldman Sachs.
Obama 2008 top campaign donor: see above.
fatjack
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 11:31amStated well KickinBack.
Report Post »poverty.sucks
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:30pmClosed primary in Florida means another loss for Romney.
Report Post »the58thstate
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:17pmthis isnt romney thats why it will look bad doing it. he wont go after the occupier in cheif but he will his own. he wouldnt even call the occupier a socialist. he says he’s a nice guy in over his head. gimme a break.
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:19pmAren‘t you from the state that Barry hasn’t visited. Don’t tell him where it is. He’ll never find it
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:15pmRomney does not need to worry about Newt at all…He is not on enough ballots to win enough delegates. Santorum is in the same boat…They cannot win the nomination now…. It is down to Romey and Paul…
Read it and weep Paul haters.
http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-washington-dc/while-newt-wins-south-carolina-paul-campaign-celebrates
You will learn to love the return to the Constitution as soon as we swallow our medicine and get back on constitutional grounds and limited Government intrusion into our lives…
No more endless wars and nation building. Only a STRONG Hoimeland defense and DECLARED wars as laid out by the Constitution…
Report Post »No more Fiat money. We will return to the Gold Standard and end the FED.
No more endless debt. 1.5 trillion cut the first yearalone!
No more welfare State…Only the TRULY needy will be helped.
No more interference of States Rights by the Federal Government
No more regulatory BS like the EPA, USDA and FEMA
Freedom and Liberty will return!
Ron Paul 2012
moose8684
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:51pmWhy do you hate Israel?
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:55pmMoose, why do you hate the Constitution?
Report Post »moose8684
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:59pmThat was TIC buddy, “why do you hate Israel” seems to be the only rebuttal I can get from people when talking about libertarianism, other than the standard “Ron Paul is crazy”.
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 12:06amMmmmmmk!
Report Post »martinez012577
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 12:15am@moose
Please explain to me how Ron Paul hates Israel. Post audio or video clips of Ron Paul saying he hates Israel. If not I am going to guess you heard that on Glenn, Sean, Rush, and Bill’s shows.
Report Post »moose8684
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 12:19amNote to self: Sarcasm is not a good tactic on message boards.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 12:31amMARTINEZ012577 Ron Paul has refused to return a campaign contribution from Don Black, who runs a vicious White Supremacist website. Paul’s newsletters display an obsession with Israel; no other country is mentioned. A 1987 issue of Paul’s Investment Letter called Israel “an aggressive, national socialist state,“ and a 1990 newsletter discussed the ”tens of thousands of well-placed friends of Israel in all countries who are willing to wok [sic] for the Mossad in their area of expertise.” Of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, a newsletter said, “Whether it was a setup by the Israeli Mossad, as a Jewish friend of mine suspects, or was truly a retaliation by the Islamic fundamentalists, matters little.”
Report Post »For 1992, the newsletter earned **$940,000** and employed Paul’s family as well as Lew Rockwell (its vice-president] and occasional editor) and seven other workers. Murray Rothbard and other libertarians believed Rockwell ghostwrote the newsletters for Paul; Rockwell later acknowledged involvement in writing subscription letters
A Conservatarian
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 2:57amRepublicorpbot, stop trying to make Rothbard, Rockwell, Paul and by extension Mises, Hayek and the rest of the Austrian Economists look bad over unsubstantiated BS. You’re crapping on people who agree completely with Benjamin Franklin and all the founders of our nation who fought a war to found the nation allowing you to mouth off on this board.
*On the Central Bank of Englands ending the Colonial Scrip in favor of placing the Colonies on the Gold Standard (which was set by the Rothschild family until the early 2000′s)*
“The colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been that England took away from the colonies their money, which created unemployment and dissatisfaction. The inability of the colonists to get power to issue their own money permanently out of the hands of George III and the international bankers was the PRIME reason for the Revolutionary War.”
-Benjamin Franklin’s Autobiography
It‘s not about Israel or Ron Paul’s Newsletter’s, it’s about ending the FED and European meddling in each of our pocket books.
Look up all those last names you mouth off about.
Watch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXt1cayx0hs if you have a few hours to spare
Read the book (as Colt says on these boards often)
The Creature From Jekyll Island
Start learning to have respect for a man you should be thanking.
Report Post »Ron Paul 2012
waspanglosaxon
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 4:21amRight on! Now that the promiscuous bisexual Gov. Rick Perry is out, it’s only a matter of time before the libertine G(etti)ngrich will bite the dust as well. If the GOP is actually dumb enough to nominate Nutty Newt, then they’d be in effect throwing the election. Romney could actually beat Obama, as could Santorum. But the Republicans’ best bet of all is Ron Paul – he alone could carry the day!
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 6:50amHey Moose…Ron paul actually wants Israel to be able to defend herself without the United States Government hold their hands down. Ron Paul knows Israel is strong, if we get out of the way and stop interfering.
As a matter of fact the Iran you are so afraid of, would have been toast many moons ago if the United tates Government would have allowed them to take actions…So the questionis this,,,Why do YOU hate Israel so much that you would hold them down while Iran develops nukes? Try that one smarty pants!
Report Post »GoodStuff
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:12pmThe fact is we’re stuck with 2nd string candidates this election cycle, and there’s nothing we can do about it. All these candidates suck.
Newt and RuPaul are the suckiest. And, neither would beat Obama. My dog has a better shot of beating Obama. Anybody who thinks Newt can beat Obama needs to have a frontal lobotomy.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:18pmWhy do you hate the Constitution? Are you on welfare or are you a defense contractor? Both will end when RP is your President..
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:53pmAnd why do you think Obama is such an amazing debater? You think he’s a master orator? Pffffft, maybe to ears that can be twisted and turned easily.
I hear the jokes about Obama needing his teleprompter, then I see such praise and fear of his speech and debating ability.
Knock it off, he‘s a second rate socialist that happens to be our nation’s first affirmative action president. He’s not a friggin genius.
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 7:14amACLU: Ron Paul is more progressive than Obama
Report Post »http://www.examiner.com/elections-2012-in-atlanta/aclu-ron-paul-is-more-progressive-than-obama
Baddoggy
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 10:05amBabeUF…So strict adherance to the Constitution is Progressive? You really need to stop smoking crack…
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:10pmIf this is his tactic, he toast. Speaking of toast,, The Pats are gonna kick Gint tukus
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 6:59amI know they are gonna try at least! I just love how they go after Newt’s past but yet…. Glenn Beck has one too!
Report Post »Glenn Beck becomes damaged goods
The radio phenom takes over the morning zoo, makes fun of miscarriages and flames out. Part 2 of 3
http://www.salon.com/2009/09/22/glenn_beck_two/singleton/
TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:07pmOk, let’s all agree that Romney is a whiny little spoon-fed baby. He‘s a rich little lord fauntleroy that wants the ’president’ prize. He is deserving of the support of Ann Coulter, Chris Christie, and all the other establishment characters. Newt’s got fire, Romney is in the muck and mire. Goodbye MIttens.
Report Post »T ParT
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:06pmThe disgrace was the social conservatives who thought that Americans gave a damn about where Clinton wagged his willy. Newt was busy balancing the budget, changing welfare, and I dont care where he wagged his willy either.
Report Post »moose8684
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:49pmHe balanced the budget by looting the SS trust fund, hardly a fiscal conservative.
Report Post »SychinLegacy
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:01pmYou want to save the country? There’s only one choice. You must choose someone who WILL restore the constitution, not augment government.
Ron Paul 2012.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:05pm“newsletters”….No chance for Paul.
Report Post »SychinLegacy
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:17pmNewsletters that were debunked 4 years ago? And 4 years before that? And four years before that? And….
Don’t fall for the tricks and lies of the media; Beck and the Blaze included. There’s a reason why BOTH SIDES fear Dr. Paul.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:22pmTron..I will make you the same offer I have had out for months… 10K for anyone, including you who finds one video of Ron Paul saying anything racist…ANYTHING!
Up to the challenge?
Report Post »martinez012577
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 12:24am@Bad
Isnt it sad so many of our fellow Americans are clueless. As Ron Paul has said in the last two debates if we dont correct this we are headed as a country into alot of trouble. My four kids will suffer because people are so scared of real change or to dumb to do their own research.
Ron Paul 2012.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 10:59pmWhere the heck is the GIANTS WIN story, Blaze? Romney again? Ugg, he’s done. Way to go Giants! Pats are gonna lose, baby!
Report Post »