Politics

Former Gameshow Host Chuck Woolery Tells You How Govt. Can Cut $1.5 Trillion

“It’s so easy, a gameshow host can do it.”

That’s what legendary gameshow host and Hollywood conservative Chuck Woolery — perhaps best known for his time hosting “The Love Connection” and the pre-Pat Sajak years of “The Wheel of Fortune” — says about cutting government spending by $1.5 trillion over ten years.

Watch Woolery, who is now a political pundit, of sorts, offer his 9 proposed government cuts — one of which is defunding “sanctuaries for albino squirrels.”

Watch his intriguing and, entertaining clip below:

Comments (131)

1 2 3
  • mcpbob
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 7:17pm

    MONKEYS smarter than CONGRESS…. and they probably work for less….hey animal rights, … they have the right to run for office, .. AND THEY ARE MUCH MORE ELECTABLE THAN THE OTHER ANIMALS WE HAVE IN OFFICE NOW

    Report Post » mcpbob  
    • jb.kibs
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 8:30pm

      Love it. WTF Chuck? where have you been, fishing? :)
      Great work, i didn’t know about the $$ for the albino squirrels… as cute as they are, i would cut that still. ;P we have brown, black and grey squirrels around here and some that have mixed together with patches. almost like calico squirrels… they’re pretty cool.

      Report Post »  
    • Joel Knows
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 11:34pm

      Barney Frank’s pretty squirrely, but Nancy and Harry are just nuts! I could describe a number of our elected government officials as snakes in the grass, there are plenty of weasels, rats, and a few other rodents that come to mind, but that would be demeaning to the animals which are much nobler in character than many of those who are elected to serve us.

      Report Post » Joel Knows  
    • RossPoldark
      Posted on November 25, 2011 at 2:45am

      They’ll work for peanuts.

      Report Post »  
    • loriann12
      Posted on November 25, 2011 at 6:39am

      We need to get them with the red squirrels we have here….Congress should cut all the funding for stupid projects, like college girls drinking, etc. I still hear that line from Ghost Busters….(paraphrased) You’ve never worked in the private sector: They expect results for their money.

      Report Post »  
    • Unix
      Posted on November 25, 2011 at 10:49am

      Well, I‘ll be a monkey’s uncle! I vote for the chimps over the chumps in congress and the WH any day! In all seriousness, our gov’t lies to us daily, and the liberals want tyranny…over my dead body!

      Report Post » Unix  
  • condera
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 7:15pm

    Yeah, there is a whole lot of cutting that could be done. Not eliminating but cutting. Certainly, there is probably a lot in defense that could also be cut, but defense has been being cut ever since Obama came ot town. I find it ironic that one of the firs things he did was cut the Eastern Europe missile defense shield now he decides he wants to get it going again. Must be trying to appease some of those moderate voters to try to get their votes for the election next year. I am sure, if he were reelected, he will make his first action after the election, scrapping those defenses again.

    Report Post »  
    • decendentof56
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 9:16pm

      Condera……..
      We need to be careful about cutting military, however, with modern technology, certainly many of the overseas bases could go.

      Think of the waste in DOE…it is staggering!
      The school where my daughter taught pre-K is a perfect example.
      For a new wing solely for pre-K, taxpayers paid to:
      1- pay to build the huge addition
      2- hire 16 teachers…yes, 16!
      3- pay their salary
      4- pay for their medical coverage
      5- pay for ‘sick days’
      6- supply the classrooms
      7- hire more custodians
      8- maintain the new wing
      9- feed the kids breakfast AND lunch!
      10- Oh, did I mention that teachers’ assistants would be needed for each class?

      This is for just one school, and is for kids that parents/grand-parents/family members should be caring for. Its no wonder we have problem kids when the parents don’t have to provide a damn bowl of cereal for breakfast or give them even enough money for the reduced-cost lunches you get in school.

      The DOE and its entitlements have to go! No one even discusses it!

      Report Post »  
    • INOGAWD
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 10:28pm

      The First Waste I would CUT AND DUMP would be
      Queen Pelosi, Prince Harry and ALL of those
      CORRUPT JACKAZZS on the HILL !!!!
      and they all know who they are…TERM LIMITS !!!

      Report Post » INOGAWD  
  • bankerpapaw
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 6:54pm

    At least Chuck had a bunch of monkeys doing the job instead of a bunch of stupid jackasses.

    Report Post »  
    • Agnes
      Posted on November 25, 2011 at 10:16pm

      Not to mention fraud and corrupt people!

      Report Post »  
  • NOBALONEY
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 6:44pm

    Chuck Woolery and Monkey Trust do what Washington couldn’t!

    Report Post » NOBALONEY  
  • mckdaddy
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 6:18pm

    Mr. Woolery, it’s said, “All great comedy requires an elements of truth”. Perhaps this would be less disturbing if there weren’t so MANY elements of truth, eh? Despite this, I thoroughly enjoyed the bit. BTW, it’d likely take a savant to remember, but I have to say, thanks for the pleasure of the golf game with yourself, Bart Starr, my dad and I. Your work with the Wisconsin youth displays a piece of your heart beyond your fame. As my kids would say, “I like your style.”

    Report Post »  
  • inferno
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 6:00pm

    I say keep the squirrels, and turn them loose on the house and senate floor. I’m sure they could find some nuts there. On second thought maybe they couldn’t, since no one in either chamber has any ba–s, sorry I meant to say nuts !

    Report Post »  
    • quicker
      Posted on November 25, 2011 at 7:44am

      Unless you are talking about the weak kneed Rinos like Boener.

      Report Post » quicker  
  • slackjaw79
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 5:32pm

    WOW!! You Blazers are so STUPID!!! Cut the EPA!! No more standards for air or water quality!! That’s brilliant!! I’m sure our country will be much better off! Cut the Dept of Education!! Yes! A great way to keep our country competitive!! Cut the Dept. of Energy! All our problems are solved!! Drill where ever and whenever we want. I’m sure nothing bad will happen. You people need to get a clue.

    Report Post »  
    • Rational Man
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 5:45pm

      I’m sure you want to keep your little squirrel friends too….right?

      Report Post » Rational Man  
    • duster
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 5:51pm

      Slackjaw79 – please tell me what the Department of Education does for the U.S. School system that states couldn’t do? Tell me how the EPA protects us – is it by mandating the use of “curley” lightbulbs that require deployment of a Hazmat team should you break one? Agree a “clue needs to be found” but suggest you are the one that is currently clueless. Educate yourself.

      Report Post » duster  
    • AJC1973
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 5:53pm

      god youre stupid the word cut.. does not equate to eliminate… i cut a peice a cake… i did not eliminate it… i cut a peice of pie i didnt throw it away…

      Report Post »  
    • 2malamutes
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 6:05pm

      #1 YES! Cut the EPA. Congress can do their job and enact laws to protect air and water quality. Laws that are simple and easy to follow, and that don’t change at the drop of a hat because someone needed to justify their job. The EPA has also brought you the loss of DDT, which even when it was proven safe was banned. Millions of Africans now have died of malaria because of the loss of that substance to fight mosquito populations.
      #2 We were EXTREMELY competitive long before the Dept. of Ed came along. remember Edison, Ford, Carnegie, John Kennedy…………We have fallen behind the rest of the world ever since its inception.
      #3 YES!! Cut the Department of Energy. We had abundant energy supplies before it came along. Since then we have become more and more dependent on foreign oil. If the DofE got out of the way we could drill in safer regions, and avoid such mishaps as happened with the BP oil rig. We could build more refineries and lower the cost of gas. Just Think, Safer Cheaper fuel.

      You need to get a clue slackjaw79. Do some research before you open your mouth and prove you are just repeating what has been spoon fed to you.

      Report Post »  
    • pug01
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 6:23pm

      i guess your city that you live in need the EPA to tell them the standards for air and water. because they are so stupid that they can’t understand why the water and air is killing people in their city. i guess your city is smarter then mine.

      Report Post »  
    • bobbie22
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 6:27pm

      Unfortunately AJC1973, the EPA and the Dept. of ED. is like hair cut it and it will grow back : (

      Report Post » bobbie22  
    • condera
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 7:05pm

      Um, when the DoEd was implemented, the US education system was producing the top students in the world in most measurable academic achievement areas. Now, through more than three decades of DoEd oversight, we now score last or nearly last in every category. So please, tell me what exactly the DoEd does that is so valuable to our education systems. The only thing they have done to academic achievement is flush it down the toilet.

      Report Post »  
    • Look4DBigPicture
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 7:19pm

      @slackjaw79…Yeah … we conservatives prefer to have dirty air and water, and want to our children to be stupid.

      Do your homework on the EPA and Dept of Education. Both of these bloated bureaucracies do more harm than good.

      Report Post »  
    • Cynic-clinic
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 9:06pm

      Hey Slakjaw—Name all the patents applied for and awarded to people who have had a federal education department, public school education in the last 20 years. The research should take only a few minutes.

      If this country is going to maintain a competitive educational advantage it won’t be because of the dummed down flunkies being created by the federal education system–it will be in spite of them.

      Report Post »  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 10:28pm

      I bet all that I have you don’t live in a cave and ride your bike to work. So shut up

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • INOGAWD
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 10:51pm

      Obama needs all the Agencies he can muster, he is so
      F’N clueless, don’t think he could find his AZZ with
      both hands !!! SOB has a Blackberry, someone needs
      to show him how to use the damn thing..instead of flying
      across the U.S. to visit with his Hollweird or union Bud’s…

      Report Post » INOGAWD  
    • sawbuck
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 10:52pm

      Yes we can cut the EPA….AND…. I’LL TELL YOU ALL WHY…!!!!

      WE DON’T HAVE ANY MORE “BIG INDUSTRY” HERE IN THE U.S.!!!
      NO JOBS TO MAKE DIRTY AIR OR DIRTY WATER..
      ONLY POLLUTION IS OUTSIDE PROTESTING IN THE STREETS…!!!
      AND THAT CAN BE FIXED WITH A BATH..!!!!
      WE ARE SAFE NOW…..!!!!!!

      HAVE A HAPPY THANKSGIVING EVERYONE..!!!!

      Report Post » sawbuck  
    • Jenny Lind
      Posted on November 25, 2011 at 9:08am

      Yeah the epa that has destroyed one of the best areas of our country to grow food in Calif, killing older fruit trees, driving up food costs and hurting the envirement by turning it into a dust bowl for a “maybe” endangered 2 inch fish. Deliberately done to hurt food supply, those guys can go. Local people are completely capable to make sure nothing really bad shows up on their front door, in fact, that is exactly what local, county, and staes are suppose to do-weigh wich is better or worse, loosing a “maybe endangered fish” or feeding people. I would hope humans come first. This administration has done it’s best to destroy food industry, why would that be I wonder?

      Report Post »  
    • Unix
      Posted on November 25, 2011 at 9:48am

      hey slackjaw, you are a moron…soon we will cut you from our budget! Liberals keep on kicking the hornets nest, you lack common sense, and have no clue what you are talking about!

      Report Post » Unix  
    • bristoltrucker
      Posted on November 25, 2011 at 11:21am

      Since creating the Department of Education we have lost our dominance in the area of education, and we have more people that are either dropping out of school all together or getting a high school diploma that are functionally illiterate. Since creating the Department of Energy our energy costs have sky rocketed. Do you not see the pattern here? Anytime the federal government exceeds their Constitutional limitations it is bad for the people and causes more harm than good.

      Report Post »  
    • gofigureinternational
      Posted on November 25, 2011 at 12:36pm

      Go back to the Yahoo chat board where 16 year old governmental policy is welcomed. Tell me genius, when China is walking over us due to the fact we have no domestic sources of oil and no credit to buy any from our “friends” like Hugo Chavez and Ahmadinejad, who exactly are you going to voice your opinion to? Meanwhile we let the same group, China and company, to drill even deeper than the last well that had the spill in the Gulf, off our U.S. shores. Do you think they are safer in their drilling practices than the U.S.A.?…Why does this occur, EPA and DOE policy. Clinton used the same lame excuses in his administration as the current regime; it would take 10 years before the first barrel of oil was shipped to a refinery. Surely even you can figure out how long ago that has been now. We are being set up and the sheep are following one by one right down the slaughter gate.

      Report Post »  
    • CatholicTexanGrandma
      Posted on November 25, 2011 at 3:50pm

      He only advocated cutting ONE EPA, that leaves 50 others intact at the state level. He only advocated cutting ONE dept of education. That leaves 5 others inteact at the state level.

      We don’t need 51 of either agency.

      Report Post »  
    • buttonhole
      Posted on November 30, 2011 at 9:52pm

      You don’t get it. It’s a state issue. Get the federal money out of the EPA, The Dept of Energy and the Dept of Education. Let the states do their thing. This is not a Federal issue. Billions if not trillions saved.

      Report Post »  
  • Thevoice
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 5:20pm

    Of course they can’t cut spending…Look at the super committee ..They are Government ..Junkies..They can’t live without the power that goes with being oversight for some government handout…. its crack to them,.Our money going threw their fingers ….What they need is a intervention ..at the bailout box…For once and for all ….The normal junkie gets picked up and thrown in the slammer and tuff luck on the withdraws …You got about the same situation with many in Washington.

    Report Post » Thevoice  
    • INOGAWD
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 11:03pm

      The SuperBunch, what a JOKE !! They should be
      the First to GO !!! When they first announced this
      Bunch, I kind of chuckled, Guess I wasn’t wrong !!

      Report Post » INOGAWD  
  • bikerr
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 5:14pm

    Like a country song says “I like it,I love it, I want some more of it”

    Report Post »  
  • A Conservatarian
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 5:06pm

    I still like Paul’s ideas better that would cut $10 Trillion over 10 years. Funny video though :)

    Report Post » A Conservatarian  
    • Rational Man
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 5:47pm

      America would be gone in less than 10yrs under Paul.

      Report Post » Rational Man  
    • A Conservatarian
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 6:42pm

      Poppycock and balderdash. But, look, I can do it too :) Under (name your preferred candidate) the US will be no more in 10 years.

      Report Post » A Conservatarian  
    • Unruled
      Posted on November 25, 2011 at 8:04am

      He calls himself a rational man… Lol

      Report Post »  
  • AmericanLass
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 5:06pm

    Chuck can do it, we can do it, why can’t CongressStupidCommittee do it ?

    Report Post » AmericanLass  
  • tharpdevenport
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 5:04pm

    Mr. Woolrey, I love you. ;-)

    More goodies like this, please.

    $1 MILLION DOLLARS A YEAR for albino squrrel sanctuaries? Ever heard of TREES?
    You know, those things they lived in BEFORE we started pumping tax payer money into sanctuaries.

    Report Post » tharpdevenport  
    • ZAP
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 5:13pm

      Just bleach regular squirrels.Who`s going to know.

      Report Post » ZAP  
    • Chuck Stein
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 5:14pm

      We pay almost $ 40 million a year to care for horses taken off of BLM land. Why? Because we don’t want them slaughtered to wind up on plates in Paris and Tokyo. Money that is well spent. Ummm … maybe just “money that is . . . well . . . spent”

      Report Post »  
    • GeorgieJo
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 9:12pm

      HOW about those shrimp on the TREADMILLS?
      Geeze Obummer and Congress are useless overspending idiots.

      Report Post »  
  • LeadNotFollow
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 4:55pm

    I’ve always liked Chuck.

    Report Post »  
    • HKS
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 5:04pm

      Almost a disaster, I thought he was going to cut the squirrels. Glad he didn’t mention the ants.

      Report Post » HKS  
    • Rational Man
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 5:49pm

      Or the armadillos, frogs, shrimp and minnows!

      Report Post » Rational Man  
  • BMartin1776
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 4:50pm

    Congress should be ashamed of themselves it is this easy to make the cuts.
    #1 $90 Million/Yr Free Mail for Congress
    #2 $146 Million/Yr 1st Class Airfare Upgrades
    #3 $3.6 Billion/Yr to run the UN
    #4 $200 Million/Yr Presidential Travel Budget
    #5 $30 Billion/Yr Farm Subsidies
    #6 $30 Billion/Yr Department of Energy
    #7 $1 Million/Yr Albino Squirrel Sanctuaries
    #8 $77 Billion/Yr Department of Education,
    #9 $10.7 Billion/Yr Eliminate the EPA
    = $1,500,000,000,000 In Cuts! So Easy Even A Game Show Host Can Do It!

    Its clear and evident of the games they are playing. Games to DIVIDE all of us!! VOTE THEM ALL OUT NO EXCEPTIONS and lets make sure Chuck has one of their jobs when its all said and done!
    I’m ready to have anyone in DC with some common sense and ability to do simple math as demonstrated here by Wollery! http://SavingtheRepublic.com…TAPGW

    Report Post » BMartin1776  
    • ramburner
      Posted on November 25, 2011 at 3:20am

      I agree. However, to make sure this condition NEVER recurs, we NEED Term Limits. 4yrs maximum per term, maximum 2 terms each person in each of the House and Senate positions. Once any person reaches 8 yrs, they can no longer serve in Congress or the Presidency. We need people who are NOT career politicians; Cain/Bachmann would be a good ticket in 2012.

      Report Post »  
  • RJO
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 4:49pm

    Hey! Just thought of a great name for any tongue-in-cheek humor segment that Chuck wants to produce and present as he hammers the political left….”Chuck-Roast.”

    Report Post » RJO  
  • flatbroke
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 4:48pm

    and i learned so much from watching the love connection to. lol

    Report Post » flatbroke  
  • RosePurple
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 4:47pm

    HAHAHAHAHA! Again, thank you Chuck……
    Happy Thanksgiving to ALL.

    Report Post »  
    • shirleyandpearl
      Posted on November 25, 2011 at 2:09pm

      “ding-ding-ding!” winner of a commentary! ‘Would like to replace what we are stuck with now, with Chuck.

      Report Post » shirleyandpearl  
  • ScienceIsNotEvil
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 4:44pm

    Since the DOE funds our all our nuclear weapons research, testing and maintenance on our nuclear warheads I assume he is for eliminating our nuclear deterrent ?

    Report Post »  
    • chips1
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 4:50pm

      One at a time and at 3 second intervals.

      Report Post »  
    • Psychosis
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 4:57pm

      um the dept. of education, or the department of energy …………….take your pick, neither one should be doing those items

      so, in a word YES !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! cut em

      now run along back to the huff and puff where simple minds enjoy each other

      Report Post » Psychosis  
    • ScienceIsNotEvil
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 7:10pm

      Psychosis,

      Then who should be building / maintaining the nuclear weapons? Try to answer this time without a childish personal insult.

      Report Post »  
    • grayling646
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 7:19pm

      That office, which is the only part of the DOE that’s necessary, could be transferred to the NRC. The only reason it was given to the DOE was to give a completely useless bureaucracy some legitimacy

      Report Post »  
  • flatbroke
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 4:42pm

    WOW chuck is more qualified to be POTUS than obama.

    Report Post » flatbroke  
  • absolutelynot
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 4:41pm

    Tax unions, they are tax exempt

    Report Post »  
    • RossPoldark
      Posted on November 25, 2011 at 2:50am

      I am a Christian. I think we should start taxing religious establishments. It would help to weed out the preachers that are making millions and living like kings and queens at the expense of their naive congregations.

      Report Post »  
    • RossPoldark
      Posted on November 25, 2011 at 3:08am

      I am a Christian. I think we should start taxing religious establishments. It would help to weed out the preachers that are making millions and living like kings and queens at the expense of their naive congregations…

      Report Post »  
    • CptStubbing
      Posted on November 25, 2011 at 6:54am

      I don’t know what church you go to buddy, but I have never met a pastor that makes millions. Even a pastor like Rick Warren who has made millions off of his books sales (which he would have to pay taxes on) isn’t a millionaire. He gives away 90% of his income. And Rick Warren made his money from those book sales not from his pastoral paychecks. A lot of the pastors I know have gone a week or two at a time without even getting a paycheck. Pastors make millions. “Ha.” “Ha” I say “Ha.”

      Besides that churches are 501(c)(3) and aren’t taxed under those guidelines. If you taxed churches all non-profits would have to be taxed. “Non-profit” by the way is why they aren’t taxed.

      You know what amazes me, is that we have a populace that wants to be taxed more. I am not opposed to being taxed, but when I see how our government continually wastes our money; I do not want to give them more of it to waste.

      Report Post »  
  • absolutelynot
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 4:41pm

    Heres another, Tax All unions seeing they have tax exempt status!!

    Report Post »  
  • garyM
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 4:38pm

    With video conference calls and the communication technology that are available these days, there is absolutely no need for a 200 Million dollar presidential travel budget, the same with the 100 Senators and about 500 congressmen and their staff’s travel budget, they could cut Billions of dollars if they really wanted to!

    Report Post »  
    • ADNIL
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 5:55pm

      I say, cut ALL travel expenses for ALL government employees. Let them pay for their own travel, gas, AND vehicles like the rest of us do for our work.

      Report Post »  
    • lodgerat
      Posted on November 25, 2011 at 2:40am

      Congress should only work part time…never mind… they already work part time

      Report Post » lodgerat  
  • chips1
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 4:35pm

    The only squirrel I know is in the White House, however he has never been referred to as albino.

    Report Post »  
    • RJO
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 4:44pm

      Way to go Chuck!

      Somebody who has name recognition, who isn’t part of the Entertainment Elite in Hollywood and has the balls to tell it like it is. Side note: Chuck will now be blacklisted by those same “powers” in Duncel-Town.

      I don’t think that Chuck really cares!!

      He was married to Joann Plug at one time…look for her to suddenly appear along side Gloria “Car-Chaser” Alred in the near future to accuse Chuck of lots of disgusting sexual deeds. Guilty until proven innocent – it works. Look at the hatchet job done to Herman Cain…and the result.

      Report Post » RJO  
    • RJO
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 4:51pm

      Correction – Joanne Pflug. Hello? Gloria?

      Report Post » RJO  
  • chewy1969nc01
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 4:34pm

    His crack team is 110% smarter than the 545 killing this country

    Report Post »  
  • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
    Posted on November 24, 2011 at 4:29pm

    Love it, there are some excellent ideas if we could get the “useful idiots” of DC to actually listen to the people for a change (not counting the few there who actually are making such an effort).

    Pensacola, Florida has white squirrels in the downtown park where the old town church used to be at.

    Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • chewy1969nc01
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 4:33pm

      His crack team is 110% smart than the 545 the are killing this country

      Report Post »  
    • sissykatz
      Posted on November 24, 2011 at 4:57pm

      Well maybe we could get him to go talk to Congress. He could
      pretend he was a Democrat and maybe they would listen. He
      has some great Ideas I think. I also think they should cut ALL
      PERKS FOR GOVERNMENT WORKERS, THEY MAKE MORE
      THAN WE DO AND WE PAY THEM, WHY DO THEY DESERVE
      PERKS ALSO??? What is Congress Mailing???? And why?????
      Does Congress really need all the staff they have??? Why can’t they
      do the things themselves…. I know they may need a little help to go
      thru the emails but My Gosh make them work for their money….

      Hey Snow, Happy Thanksgiving,,,,to you and Kitty,,,
      Happy Thanksgiving to all you Blazers…..

      Report Post »  
1 2 3

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love