Four GOP Candidates Join Perry’s Lawsuit to Get on Va. Primary Ballot
- Posted on January 1, 2012 at 12:04pm by
Madeleine Morgenstern
- Print »
- Email »

Texas Gov. Rick Perry has been joined by four of his fellow GOP presidential candidates in his lawsuit against Virginia's elections board. (AP)
Four additional GOP presidential candidates left off Virginia’s Republican primary ballot have joined Texas Gov. Rick Perry in suing the state elections board.
Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum announced Saturday they were joining Perry‘s lawsuit charging that Virginia’s ballot rules are unconstitutional.
The suit is challenging Virginia’s rules that determine who can appear on the primary ballot: To qualify in the state, candidates must submit 10,000 signatures from registered Virginia voters, including at least 400 from each of 11 congressional districts — a bar some say only the best-funded campaigns can meet.
CNN reported:
In the lawsuit filed Tuesday, Perry said the statutes of Virginia law that regulate access to the ballot were “among the most onerous in the nation and severely restrict who may obtain petition signatures.”
In their release Saturday, Bachmann, Gingrich, Huntsman and Santorum request the board of elections add their names to the ballot, saying it will avoid “unnecessary costs and expenses to the state and the parties” that would be incurred by moving the lawsuit forward.
The Virginia Republican Party announced last week that both Perry and Gingrich failed to submit the required number of signatures and therefore were disqualified from the ballot. Bachmann, Huntsman and Santorum opted not to file any paperwork at all, leaving former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and Texas Rep. Ron Paul the only GOP presidential candidates to qualify.
Gingrich blasted Virginia’s decision to kick him off the ballot, calling it a “failed system” and comparing the setback to Pearl Harbor. According to CNN, he cited campaign worker fraud as the reason for not qualifying.
In a statement last week, Perry‘s campaign called Virginia’s provisions unconstitutional in restricting ballot access.
“We believe that the Virginia provisions unconstitutionally restrict the rights of candidates and voters by severely restricting access to the ballot, and we hope to have those provisions overturned or modified to provide greater ballot access to Virginia voters and the candidates seeking to earn their support,” Perry communications director Ray Sullivan said.
Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli is expected to file emergency legislation to try to aid the candidates in getting on the ballot as well.
Virginia has 49 delegates. Its primary will be held March 6.





















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (128)
sbenard
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 5:17pmIf you can‘t join ’em, beat ‘em!
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:36pmLol….2 thumbs up!!!
Report Post »Tower7_TRUTH
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 7:06pmGood thing they don’t force an IQ test to get on the ballot, But maybe they should
Report Post »you know we test the Military and Cops…. May not the President and Congressmen ?
Say you have to score at least 100 ?
Tower7_TRUTH
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 7:07pmwhy not the President and Congressmen ?
Report Post »Tower7_TRUTH
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 7:09pmGood thing I’m not running lol
Report Post »Caniac Steve
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 11:48pmit maybe unconstitional nationally..but for the state/commonwealth of Virginia it is perfectly legal…the other 4 need to stop the whinning and move on…
Report Post »Wolf
Posted on January 2, 2012 at 10:48amThey should’ve known about this and followed the rules immediately. Now is not the time to be calling foul just because they can’t get their way, though they do have a legitimate complaint, it should’ve been resolved decades ago.
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 2, 2012 at 7:39pmClara88
Report Post »“Ken Cuccinelli changes his mind – The Virginia Primary is Ron Paul & Mitt Romney”
http://www.examiner.com/elections-2010-in-wilmington/ken-cuccinelli-changes-his-mind-the-virginia-primary-is-ron-paul-mitt-romney
sorry
dannyvabchva
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 4:01pmIf they can’t get 10,000 signatures what makes people think they can run a goverment.
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 4:16pmhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/virginia-politics/post/perry-disqualified-from-va-primary-ballot/2011/12/23/gIQA3BZNEP_blog.html
Perry turned in 11,911 signatures
Newt turned in 11,050 signatures
BOTH turned them in by the 5pm deadline
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 4:17pmYup. BooHoo hoooo for the fake ass conservatards and the communist gingrich. Their campaigns obviousy suck otherwise they would have known the Virginia laws, and would have been able to find a couple (and that’s all 10K signatures amount to in the political world) people interested in who they are.
Screw them idiots.
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 4:31pmClara88
Report Post »You and the 4 candidates need to read the Virginia requirements again. A candidate needs 10,000 sigs 400 from every voting district in the state. That doesn’t mean 500 from one and 200 from another. That being sad, some of us worked very hard to get our candidate on the VA ballot and some didn’t work at all. Maybe you should be joining the OWS crowd, they don’t seem to want to work for much either.
The10thAmendment
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 4:37pm@ Clara88
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 4:16pm
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/virginia-politics/post/perry-disqualified-from-va-primary-ballot/2011/12/23/gIQA3BZNEP_blog.html
Perry turned in 11,911 signatures
Newt turned in 11,050 signatures
BOTH turned them in by the 5pm deadline in revisionist history. The commie gingrich didn‘t and he knows that he didn’t and it’s why he threw his little girl commie fit. These 4 are all idiots, AND liars.
This is happening because even gingrich, who lives in the State knows that it’s ILLEGAL for write-in candidates.
§ 24.2-644. Voting by paper ballot; voting for presidential electors; write-in votes.
D. No write-in vote shall be counted unless the name is entered on the ballot in conformance with this section. No write-in vote shall be counted when it is apparent to the officers of election that a voter has voted for the same person for the same office more than one time. No write-in vote shall be counted for an office for any person whose name appears on the ballot as a candidate for that office. If two or more persons are to be elected to the same office, a voter may vote for one or more persons whose names do appear on the ballot and one or more persons whose names do not appear on the ballot, provided that the total number of votes cast by him for that office does not exceed the number of persons to be elected to that office.
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 4:37pmCommonSense…Come on now….THAT OWS thing>>was beneath you
I
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 4:40pmCommonSense…
CommonSense….i thought THIS part of THAT article was INTERESTING
Two former Democratic attorneys general are backing the move, along with a former Democratic state party chairman and a former Republican state party chairman.
Former state Attorney General Tony Troy called the Virginia process a “legal and constitutional embarrassment.” Fellow former top Virginia prosecutor Steve Rosenthal said: “This is not a Democratic or Republican issue. If it takes emergency legislation, then we need to do it.”
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/12/31/virginia-attorney-general-intervenes-in-gop-primary-ballot-dispute/#ixzz1iFDZ9PNG
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 5:14pmI don’t think 2 former Democratic attorneys, a Democratic state party chairman, washed up Republican chairman, Tony Troy and Steve Rosenthal (2 more attorneys, which also maybe dems) help your case. Plus if I’m not mistake it takes 80% of the legislators to change the requirements, after the fact. All this before Super Tuesday? The People of VA should be very happy with these 4 by then.
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:11pmGood point. “To qualify in the state, candidates must submit 10,000 signatures from registered Virginia voters, including at least 400 from each of 11 congressional districts — a bar some say only the best-funded campaigns can meet.” Really? How much “funding” does it take to get a signature? It had better be “zero”! How much funding does it take to collect a signature? If you inspire volunteers, then that sould be “zero” as well. Romney probably got it done with funding. Paul probably had more volunteers. I’m for the Conservative in the race (Santorum), but he didn’t do his work in Virginia and should have to take the hit for it.
Report Post »greensteam
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:17pmdoesnt matter how much you hate them, if you run for office in 50 states, it should be easier for people making millions in donations to get on the ballots. if santorum is in on it, i believe it must be legit. the others may have questions around them. who would say that they are all four of them conservatards or whatever? they are who they are. dont vote for them if you dont like them. but they still have a right to be there. virginia laws were already set, but that doesnt mean they are constitutional. by these rules today imagine some of the great presidents we never would have seen.
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:34pmI would think that the citizens of VA would want ALL of their laws to closely follow the Constitution ESPECIALLY all of you Ron Paul supporters….hmmmmm????? What say YOU about THIS Ron Paul?? I hear>>>CRICKETS?????
Report Post »I have family in Norfolk and they are very upset and embarrassed by all of this and agree that what is going on in VA is UNCONSTITUTIONAL….REGARDLESS of the unconstitutional rules ALREADY set in place. I think the state of VA is going to be hearing from MANY of it’s citizens soon.
It doesn’t matter WHAT party you support?? What matters is the Constitution>>The Supreme Law Of The Land
Tower7_TRUTH
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 7:04pmTHESE CLOWNS can’t get on the Ballet in VA but you hear all the Things they
Report Post »will do the 1st day as president…. LOL I’m sure you will do wonders and
Sh#t Plonders as soon as we make you President, but today we can’t get
on a ballet……
c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 7:41pmClara88
Report Post »So all these years the requirements to get on the VA ballot has been unconstitutional? Or do we have 5 candidates that couldn’t get the support of 10,000 people out of a population of over 8 million and are just poor losers? Or do we have people like your family in Norfolk that didn’t get off the couch and do the work necessary to get their candidate on the ballot? The longer this goes on the more they all look like Whining libs. You should really stop, this is not helping Perry or the other 4 book touring candidates. Nobody feels sorry for them.
Clara88
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 8:11pmCommonSense….with YOU…i just agree to disagree…and you know NOTHING about my family in Norfolk…except i WILL tell you that they are BRAVE MILITARY and have done PLENTY to help NOT ONLY their state but ALSO their COUNTRY.
And…YOU are RIGHT. NO ONE feels sorry for Gov Rick Perry. I remember YOU telling me that he had NO money and would soon be out?? Gov Rick Perry has spent MORE money in Iowa than ANY OTHER candidate. He has PLENTY of money, backing and support. Just like Gov Perry says..If Washington IS The PROBLEM…WHY Trust The People Who Have Been Working IN Washington To Fix The PROBLEM???? I AGREE!!! Gov Perry is the ONLY TRUE Washington Outsider in this race. Mike Huckabee WON Iowa in their primary LAST time and he did NOT become the nominee. Everything does NOT depend on VA either!!!!
http://www.rickperry.org/
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 8:31pmCommonSense….i take YOUR comment to mean that YOU do NOT care if your state’s voting laws are Constitutional OR not?? Hmmmm….yeah…keep on pushing that Ron Paul is a Constitionalist Thing. Ron Paul HAS BEEN IN CONGRESS…it’s time for New Blood in Washington>>I Choose Gov Rich Perry….he is the BEST PERSON for the job out of EVERYONE…just my opinion and as an American i have EVERY RIGHT to it. :))
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 10:55pmClara88
Report Post »You sure gave me an ear full.
Rick Perry has plenty of money. It is the rest of the 5 that don’t have any. He just doesn’t have any supporters other than you. For the record I’m glad of that, if he did you would not have to be defending him not being on the VA Ballot. That being said, it is best not to bring others into your fight, once that has been done they are fair game. Don’t worry thou we all have some couch potatoes in the family. I’m not worried about the VA ballot laws, they will stand up in court, if it ever gets that far. These 5 are all but done. Again it sure would be an honor to welcome you and your enthusiasm to The Revolution.
labratz5620
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 11:03pmThey all knew the requirements of getting on the Virginia ballot from the very beginning. Now they are crying about the law! Just because they are not on the ballot doesn’t mean no one can vote for them. They can always ask supporters for their “write in” vote. Emergency legislature is not the answer here. That is mearly changing the law for convenience. Go through the proper channels to change this law, through popular vote or state congress sessions. Sorry guys, you should lose on this one. You do not deserve to be on the ballot according to the Virginia laws!
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 2, 2012 at 10:03amCommonSense….”Rick Perry Doesn’t Have ANY Supporters”>> PLEASE
/////////////////////////////////////
Aside from Iowa frontrunners Mitt Romney and Ron Paul, Perry is thought to be the only Republican candidate here with the kind of sophisticated ground game to pull off a much-needed comeback.
And with public and internal polling from various campaigns showing the fight for third place to be a fluid one between Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich and Perry, a robust organization can mean the difference between a ticket home and a ticket to New Hampshire.
There are 1,774 Republican caucus precincts around the state, 900 of which are combined and held at the same location.
As of Friday, the Texas governor had signed up 1,500 precinct leaders in Iowa, a source inside the Perry campaign told CNN.
The source requested anonymity because staffers are not authorized to reveal the information.
The Perry camp also has 470 out-of-state volunteers descending on Iowa this weekend (including Perry’s own family, which flew in on Friday).
The source said that by caucus night, “we will easily have over 2,000 Perry volunteers” fanning out across the state knocking on doors and speaking for Perry at their voting sites.
That means roughly 95% of caucus locations will hear from a representative from the Perry campaign on Tuesday night, the source added.
http://www.politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 2, 2012 at 10:09amhttp://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/12/31/perry-bets-iowa-fortunes-on-robust-ground-game/
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 2, 2012 at 10:26amFollow Rick Perry
GovernorPerry Over 500 volunteers from 32 states in Iowa to make a difference for America!! @GovernorPerry’sIowaStrikeForce 3 hours ago · reply · retweet · favorite
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 2, 2012 at 10:28amClara88
Report Post »Did you know that all state wide elections in the state of Virginia have these same requirements? This is nothing new in the state, everyone running for office state wide plays by the same rules. You would think that a big shot running for president could do the same as some snake of a lawyer running for AG.
Clara88
Posted on January 2, 2012 at 10:50amCommonSense…i know PLENTY about VA voting rules.
http://virginiavirtucon.wordpress.com/2011/12/25/is-this-any-way-to-choose-a-presidential-candidate/
and….Looks like Romney and Paul’s signatures were NEVER even verified????
Report Post »///////////////////////////
Even though i keep blowing holes in ALL of your theories…esp when it comes to Gov Rick Perry..you just KEEP coming back. ;)
Clara88
Posted on January 2, 2012 at 11:09amVA Doesn’t Seem To Care About….The Equal Protection Clause of The Constitution????
Forcing Gov Perry and Newt’s signatures to be verified BUT giving Romney and Paul a FREE PASS????
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 2, 2012 at 11:37amClara88
Report Post »You need to stop. This is not helping Perry, if he was running as a Democrat this would be the status quo. (which he was and acts like he still is) Perry is looking for the Conservative vote is he not? Even the AG of Virginia has back away from this. This does nothing but hurt these 5.
Clara88
Posted on January 2, 2012 at 11:51amNo…it hurts YOUR state>>>>which also went blue for Obama in 2008
Ron Paul ALSO wants the conservative vote…the i’m a Libertarian…No i’m not…i’m a republican NOW candidate???
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 2, 2012 at 12:11pmCommonSense….
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/virginia-attorney-general-changes-mind-wont-intervene-in-primary-ballot-case/2012/01/01/gIQAorjzUP_blog.html
The VA Attorney General said that he would seek a change in the requirements for future elections. And…that he feels very strongly that Va needs to change it‘s ballot access requirements for it’s statewide elections. He won’t change the rules now…but at least he is admitting there is a problem!!
Considering these rules were put in place by Democrats in the 1970′s….i think it’s time that SOMEONE looks into it!!!!
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 2, 2012 at 3:59pmClara88
Report Post »Just dont think this is the fight these 5 should be having. I dont see anything good coming of it. If anything it will help Paul, by spitting the vote off of Romney. But if you think it a good one. March on!
garyM
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 3:28pmDES MOINES, Iowa – Newt Gingrich says GOP rival Mitt Romney would buy the presidency if he could.
Gingrich made the comment Sunday after attending Mass at the St. Ambrose Cathedral in Des Moines.
Gingrich said the amount that the former Massachusetts governor will spend over his various campaigns will rival that spending of billionaire New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg.
Gingrich said he believes that “Romney would buy the election if he could.”
A political action committee supporting Romney has rolled out ads attacking Gingrich in the days before Tuesday’s caucuses.
The former House speaker is set to make three campaign stops later Sunday in Iowa.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/01/gingrich-romney-would-buy-election-if-could/#ixzz1iExfUPxI
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 3:53pmPerry, “Oops”.
Report Post »garyM
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 3:17pmI’m calling the GOP nominee and the VP pick, with info gathering from watching Glenn Beck’s GBTV!
Report Post »Romney/Huntsman 2012
William Hemenway
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 4:10pmGod save us all if your right
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 3:05pmHmmmm…..Acorn with their NEW name gets $800,000 in fraudulent funds from Obama>>breaks Federal Law…..and everyone wonders WHAT is going on in Va??? HELLO…..
Report Post »Newt and Perry BOTH turned in MORE than enough signatures BUT thousands of these signatures were thrown out????? It’s FRAUD…plain and simple. They BOTH knew the rules and they BOTH followed the rules but NEITHER ONE is going to be on the Primary Ballot?????
FRAUDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Come on Attorney General of Va…get to the bottom of this…….Thanks!
Clara88
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 3:09pmObama breaking Federal Law….funding voter fraud
Report Post »http://theulstermanreport.com/2011/12/31/barack-obama-violates-federal-law-funding-voter-fraud-to-win-2012-election/
c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 3:37pmClara88
Report Post »You need to read VA ballot requirements again.
Clara88
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 3:49pmVA Attorney General Intervenes…
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/12/31/virginia-attorney-general-intervenes-in-gop-primary-ballot-dispute/
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 3:50pmAG of VA wants law changed for Primary…
http://lezgetreal.com/2011/12/virginia-ag-wants-law-changed-for-primary/
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 3:53pmhttp://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/01/virginia_ag_trying_to_fix_states_embarrassing_ballot_snafu.html
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 3:58pmCommonSense…..The process in VA is Unconstitutional…Plain and Simple
Report Post »circleDwagons
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 4:13pm@clara, Hope that you had a good Christmas. are you still stuck on perry? he and newt are whining. how can you support a Whiner? if there was fraud deal with it like a big boy. it’s disgusting that obama is suing arizona and SC, likewise it’s disgusting that perry is suing VA.
Report Post »WAKE up AMERICA RON PAUL is the ONLY viable republican candidate.
c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 4:16pmClara88
Report Post »Please stop! My ears are very small today, from all the Adult Beverages last night and when I laugh it hurts..
Plain and Simple, these 4 losers couldn’t mustard up anyone to do the hard work getting them on the ballot. They will all be out of the race before Virginia even has their primary.
c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 4:20pmClara88
“AG of VA wants law changed for Primary”
Typical liberal thinking. Go around the elected Representatives and the people of Virginia . Straight to the courts.
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 4:26pmTo..CircledWagons and CommonSense
CircledWagons>>Had a great Christmas…thanks..hope YOU had the same? :)
Happy New Year>>CommonSense>>>LOL on the ears comment.. :D
All i am trying to say is i want someone to check the signatures that were THROWN OUT and see if it was legit?? IF i had turned in MORE THAN ENOUGH signatures and turned them ALL in by the DEADLINE…i would be asking the SAME questions. WHY were THOUSANDS of MY signatures thrown out?????
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/virginia-politics/post/perry-disqualified-from-va-primary-ballot/2011/12/23/gIQA3BZNEP_blog.html
Perry turned in 11,911 signatures
Newt turned in 11,050 signatures
BOTH turned them in by the 5pm deadline
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 4:30pmCommonSense….i thought THIS part of THAT article was INTERESTING
Two former Democratic attorneys general are backing the move, along with a former Democratic state party chairman and a former Republican state party chairman.
Former state Attorney General Tony Troy called the Virginia process a “legal and constitutional embarrassment.” Fellow former top Virginia prosecutor Steve Rosenthal said: “This is not a Democratic or Republican issue. If it takes emergency legislation, then we need to do it.”
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/12/31/virginia-attorney-general-intervenes-in-gop-primary-ballot-dispute/#ixzz1iFDZ9PNG
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 4:36pmClara88
Report Post »I must say. I love your enthusiasm and will be proud to welcome you to the Revolution when the time comes.
marion
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:36pmIt is really simple. If the names are to be deemed invalid, since there are many out there trying to prevent these candidates from getting into the race, a mole goes in, gets bad signatures on purpose, and then you have voter fraud. Are the candidates totally responsible for this, no, it does need to be looked into in order to validate voter fraud on purpose, and then given a second chance as soon as possible to get valid signatures. It’s one thing to slack off and not turn in signatures, another to have an election thrown to prevent a candidate from being part of the process. Everyone has to look at both sides of this, whether or not you like the candidates.
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 11:44pmI swear I saw somewhere waaaaaay up in this little argument something about agreeing to disagree.
Report Post »johnpaulkuchtajr
Posted on January 2, 2012 at 8:49amKen Cuccinelli is now making headlines by BACKING AWAY from this issue. He was trying his darndest to generate some media buzz for his run at governor; but, maybe even the great unwashed see this hubbub for what it is: smoke and mirrors!
Cuccinelli won’t kick butt on the “unindicted co-conspirators” from the HLF terror trial living or operating in VA; but, he’ll get everybody all worked-up over an abortive attempt to jump into the ballot issue? Give me a break. Cuccinelli is the emptiest of all the empty suits. I have RRR letters to prove that I laid all this Muslim Brotherhood slim out for him. His response: Not my job.
Report Post »JustPeachy
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 2:46pmPaul and Romney supporters: If Paul or Romney was left off the ballot, that would be fine with you too–since they wouldn’t have met the “qualifications?”
Well, if I was a Virginian, I’d be ticked that while most of the rest of the country will likely have all the choices available to them at the time, I’d only get two.
That’s the bottom line for the CITIZEN, IMO.
Screw the politics!
Report Post »Roaran
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 3:09pmPaul supporters should be for having everyone up there on the ballot. All the morons will vote between Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, and Bachman; while everyone else will simply vote for Paul.
But they can‘t be on the ballot if they don’t meet the requirements, and if it’s true that there is some fraud, hopefully they can work it out before the vote.
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 3:23pmThen they should have either changed this rule right after the 2008 GOP primary was conducted……
…..or……
They shoulda’ waited until after the 2012 GOP primary was conducted so that they could change it for 2016…
Waiting until 2 months before the 2012 primary is conducted to change this rule in order to accommodate Gingrich and company just makes it look like vote-rigging on behalf of Ken Cuccinelli and the GOP in Virginia….
This just sounds like something the liberals would do…….”Oh, we didn’t win?…..well, we’ll fix that….we’ll just change the rules of the game in midstream and have another go at it!”
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 3:45pmJustPeachy
Report Post »Posted on January 1, 2012 at 2:46pm
“Well, if I was a Virginian”
Well your not a Virginian. Paul and Romney supporters worked hard in Virginia to get their Candidates on the ballot. In the America I know people that work hard are rewarded. What America do you believe in? Maybe you should join the OWS crowd.
MAULEMALL
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 2:38pmhttp://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Ron_Paul%27s_1987_Resignation_Letter_to_the_RNC
He quit the party ..He quit his constituants and he stabbed the guy in the back that got him elected and reelected..
Report Post »Who does he send his letter to when he wants to quit as potus?
c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 2:45pmMAULEMALL
Report Post »Nobody really cares. Who’s wants a President that takes their marching orders from the Republican Party and not the Constitution?
JustPeachy
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 2:48pmYes, some of us care. It’s part of that “flip-flopping” he never has claimed to have done!
“I’m a repub. . oh wait, no I’m not. . dang that didn’t work so. . . I’m a repub again, but I’ll call myself a “Libertarian!” LOL
Report Post »I Love Freedom
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 2:53pmBoy are you people grasping at straws…ROTFLMAO
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 3:14pmJustPeachy
Report Post »I’m so Glad you put the Party in front of the Constitution. Sounds like something right out the Soviet Union days.
OneTermPres
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 3:29pmRon Paul is and always has been a Libertarian. What you call “flip flopping” is inconsequential due to the fact that party affiliation doesn’t mean anything when you are applying the EXACT SAME voting strategies which is to only vote with the Constitution.
Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate with any common sense and the ONLY candidate that can give us our civil liberties back and put our economy back on track and you republicans are going to screw it up.
Here‘s what I don’t get. I read a lot of the comments and since this site came up it has been a TEA Party policies of follow the Constitution, cut spending among other things and when you blatantly get that candidate who has only voted with the Constitution and will balance the budget AND CUT SPENDING WITHOUT CUTTING ENTITLEMENTS, it’s like you people go brain dead and start buying all the “promises” these guys spit out.
We are broke from over spending and 3 wars and NOW EVERY CANDIDATE wants to go to war with Iran. This is Iraq ALL OVER AGAIN. There are no WMD’s there and we will invade them if someone other than Ron Paul is President. Congratulations for being pro war, wear a sign so I know who to thank when we are standing in the food lines.
Report Post »resme
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 4:17pmRonald Reagan: “I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism”.
Report Post »PapaJohannesPatriot
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 2:36pmIt does not speak well of any candidate who is not aware of the election laws of each state. Someone on the campaign committees should have researched and known in advance the campaign laws for each state.
Report Post »cgnick
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 3:31pmRight you are. Newt himself admitted that one his folks turned in fraudulant signatures in Virginia. These candidates have fell short of the legal requirements to get their name on the ballot and now they want to challenge the validation process. Rule are rules. They should get their day in court. It does go to show that Virginians are not really a big priority for the candidates who fell short.
Report Post »OperationNorthwoods
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 2:12pmWhile these rules seem a little ridiculous, they are still the rules. Why was it that Paul and Romney were able to get on the ballot and not the others? Also the candidates that filed no paperwork didn’t even try to get on the ballot. That’s just pathetic. How could you consider yourself a credible candidate if you don’t even try to get on the ballot?
Report Post »cgnick
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 3:38pmMost of these candidates were just trying to sell books when they started campaigning for POTUS. The absolute dissaray of the Republican party is evident when theocrats like Santorum, Bachman and Perry are actually considered serious candidates for president. These candidates talk about basing laws on their own personal religious beliefs. That is the type rule that the first colonists were fleeing when they came to this great continent.
Report Post »circleDwagons
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 4:23pmsuing is NOT a CHRISTIAN principle. making false statements is not Christian, attacking your neighbor is also frawn upon. perry, newt, bachman and santorie need HELP, GOD please help these lost souls and their followers
Report Post »TRILO
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 1:52pmWhat a bunch of cry babies.They knew what they had to do to get on the ballot. The second tier candidates such as Bachmann, Huntsman and Santorum need to worry about their own faltering campaigns not Newt and Perry’s campaign issues.
So they cry the requirements are unconstitutional because you need too much $$$ to get signatures. You mean to tell me that Newt and Perry’s campaign organization could not get enough volunteers to go out door to door over the past several months and get enough signatures. If they could not get on the ballot it is not because of a bad policy, it is because of one of two reasons; poor campaign organization and/or the people do not support them. I would say… both.
Report Post »Libertarian B 4 Libertarians Were Cool
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 1:47pmTypical politicians… They can’t do it correctly so they go crying to the courts!
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 1:56pmYeah, the very laws they make trip them up and they whine about it. How do they think the average American feels — being regulated to death?
I don’t care at this point. Let them all on the ballot and let the chips fall where they may.
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 2:09pmVechorik
Report Post »Well I do care. I campaigned hard to get my candidate on the ballot of VA. This just shows that these 4 are nothing but Libs, demanding to be rewarded for something they didnt work for. They are part of the so called 99% of OWSers.
YepImaConservative
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 2:10pmLol. Kinda’ like most of Ron Paul’s “social conservative” congressional votes are actually 10th Amendment votes, which [sidestep the actual issue at hand] and redirects the discussion to states right. He is a career politician, supported by folks who claim to oppose career politicians. BS and Shell games by a man who was MIA on far too many Constitutional issues to call himself a Constitutionalist with a straight face.
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 2:32pmAnd what a Slap in the face to the People of Virginia.
Report Post »MAULEMALL
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 2:37pmhttp://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Ron_Paul%27s_1987_Resignation_Letter_to_the_RNC
He quit the party ..He quit his constituants and he stabbed the guy in the back that got him elected and reelected..
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 3:24pmMAULEMALL
Report Post »It was Paul who was one of the only people in Congress that backed Reagan.
http://www.dailypaul.com/163624/ron-reagan-1976
jcannon98188
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 5:33pm@MAULEMALL
Reading the first paragraph or two, it looks like the party quit him, not the other way around. Are you so blind that you would swear total allegiance to a party that has lied and betrayed EVERYTHING that they stand for? If so, I sincerely hope you never get into politics sir.
Report Post »garyM
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 1:38pmI think I have finally read the tea leaves by watching the debates, Glenn Beck on GBTV and listening to the talking heads on the news. It’s gonna Romney with Huntsman was the VP!
Report Post »Romney/Huntsman
Do you see what these guys have in common?
Baddoggy
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 1:44pmSure sure Gary…then they can wear their white shirts and ride bicycles around dorr to door. Get a clue.
Report Post »cgnick
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 3:43pmRomney is a shill for the corporate class. Huntsman is the only reasonable candidate for moderates like myself, thats why he does not have a chance in the republican party that has been highjacked by extremists. Bachman, Perry and Santorum are the American equivalent to the Taliban.
Report Post »sawbuck
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 1:30pmI find it very predictable that our choices are being narrowed down and leaving only two candidates for the GOP Nominee.
Report Post »Only Not by “We The People” but by added rules and regulations.
And just because it was excused last election unconstitutional is unconstitutional..!
Last time I checked the Constitution set the laws/requirements/limitations, for who wants to run for the POTUS.
I wonder how many people were aware of this impending over-sight before it became a major screw-up and were silently watching with bated breath.
As a big fan of chess ..
The moves that are left for “We the People” are being eliminated in a expedited manor to say the least . Leaving only a few options on the table ,that by most peoples definition….
Would be considered extreme…!
TXPilot
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 1:39pmSo, the Republican candidates are now down to legal squabbling…..Wake me up when Obama get’s re-elected, so I will have time to evacuate to the bunker.
Report Post »TRILO
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 2:09pmThe Constitution delegates those powers not specifically granted to the Federal government to the states. The only issue that the Constitution addresses is the electorial process. (Article II, Sect 1) Election laws and ballot requirements for primaries are not federal issues, they are states issues. Therefore each state can set their own election rules and ballot requirements.
They did not follow the rules so they go running to the courts crying that the requirements are unconstitutional. Why did they not file a lawsuit before they were disqualified or is a law only unconstitutional if you fail in the requirements.
If the state legislators pass “emergency” legislation to get them on the ballot I think that is an even greater miscarriage of justice… change the rules after the fact. Typical politicians helping their “friends”.
Report Post »circleDwagons
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 4:32pmthe candidates are elimiting themselves. we get to see the true big government Whiners that these folks are. thank you newt……….. i remember Pearl Harbor , i also remember the Alamo.
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 11:49pmTrilo.. it’s only unconstitutional after you fail to get all the signatures :)
Report Post »abbygirl1994
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 1:28pmI find this revolting, that these men, who knew what was expected of them and failed in doing so are now whining and using attorney’s to get what they want.. so the only one on the ball was Romney and Ron Paul were the only ones on the ball… I say.. Go Mitt.. and you may shout for Paul.. it only shows me that these two men are far more serious about what they are doing than any of the others! God help us!
Report Post »MAULEMALL
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 1:35pmrpaul is a not a republican..
Report Post »http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Ron_Paul%27s_1987_Resignation_Letter_to_the_RNC
Libertarian B 4 Libertarians Were Cool
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 1:49pmRegardless MAULEMALL
Ron Paul is the only true champion of liberty… Get a clue!
Report Post »hallkbrdz
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 2:47pmHere here!
Now people in VA have a nice easy choice:
Big Govt.with mandates candidate VS Small Govt with liberty candidate.
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 1:17pmThis is something Libs do.
Report Post »I Love Freedom
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 1:31pmYes as well as progressives, and socialist
Report Post »Nanaswords
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 1:16pmIt seems as though Virginia has some updating to do in their listing on ballot of candidates ! This is not the late 50′s …get with it Virginia ! Looks as though their Attorney General has some more important work to do for Virginia ! There should not be such restrictions for any nationally run candidate to appear on their ballots. Was this just another way they have had in the past to Control who runs for office ? Looks like it was a good ol’ boy network from the past ! IT DOES NOT LOOK GOOD FOR VIRGINIA SO FAR>>>Get with it Ken C. This sort of Politics is just what Americans want to get rid of !
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 1:29pmOh, but it’s “different this time”….
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 2:17pmNanaswords
Report Post »I would think the voters of VA would know what looks best for VA. Not you, 4 elitists and a judge.
AxelPhantom
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 12:57pmVirginia also has this interesting pledge that must be signed before voting for the Republican nominee:
“I, the undersigned, pledge that I intend to support the nominee of the Republican Party for president.”
Of course it has no enforcement mechanism, only your word as a voter…….
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 2:37pmMAULEMALL
Report Post »Nobody reall cares. Whos wants someone that takes their marching orders from the Repbublian Party and not the Contitution?
c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 2, 2012 at 10:34amAxelPhantom
Report Post »That is not a law of the state of Virginia , that’s the Republican Parties new rules. Now this should be fun.
Mr. Oshawott
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 12:45pmThis is pure baloney. Those four candidates (Rick Santorum, Rick Perry, Michele Bachmann, and Newt Gingrich) either failed to get enough votes or have willingly forgotten to file the necessary paperwork; therefore, they have only themselves to blame for their misfortune. I don’t see this lawsuit having any chance of making it. Virginia’s election system has operated the way it has for years.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 1:03pmLets wait and see how Ron Paul rules on its constitutionality. His thoughts are best in these matters. Oh great and wonderful OZ please advise us…..
Report Post »I Love Freedom
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 1:23pm@ MR. OSHAWOTT
You’re right on the money. It also shows who the MSM, Levin, Rush, Hanity are propping up, no ground support for the others. Hell, I bet all 4 of them will tell you Tuesday how right they are to do it while slamming ACORN for the same thing..LOL..I can’t wait for Tuesday
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 12:41pmSeems like some so-called small Gov R’s , or Conservatives, are FOR restrictive BIG Government rules that won’t let viable candidates participate in the REPUBLICAN Primary. Go Figure.
Report Post »WiredRight
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 12:29pmJust like the occupiers… these fools want something for nothing! Two candidates played by the rules and got on the ballot. Then the whining starts… It’s not fair! Sounds kinda like social justice to me.
Report Post »Jefferson
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 12:55pm@WIREDRIGHT
EXACTLY RIGHT.
These guys couldn’t get on the ballot by getting 10k signatures, so now they are trying to hijack the system put in place.
Sounds JUST like what the current resident of the WH is doing with his NDAA “signing statements.”
(among many other atrocities)
That is why there is no difference between any of them. They are all showing just exactly what they would do if elected. No respect for the rule of law, and the system of checks and balances put into place, so they try to side step it. Haven’t we had enough of this nonsense?
Ron Paul and Romney (this time) played by the rules, and accomplished what was expected of them. The other candidates are acting like a bunch of entitled spoiled brats, that think they deserve something when in reality, they didn’t do what was necessary to EARN it.
I‘d bet my last dollar that if Romney didn’t have the money, influence, and support to get on the ballot, he would be joining with the other “brats” to sidestep the process.
They ALL (aside from Paul) pay lip service to the rule of law, unless it somehow gets in the way of their agenda.
Don’t get fooled again America.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 1:12pmOther than lip service what has Paul ever done? Drunk woman killing Ted Kennedy did more to push his agenda …. Paul has been nothing but mouth
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 1:47pmRepublicorp…Don’t you think you would like Cuba better? I mean, they don’t talk about the Constitution all the time. Are you a c;oset commie? I think so…
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 2:14pmBADDOGGY attacking me shows how weak your argument is. Truth is, Teddy was more successful. “Will Do” is and always has been pure BS……. but the blind Bots are willing to take an IOU from a 30yr do-nothing Politician.
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 7:46pmWiredRight
Report Post »The truth may hurt someone’s fellings, but has to be spoken.
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 12:21pmAs many have mentioned, watch for the Obama bands to pull off each and every trick in the book; via the support funding of Lord Soros.
Report Post »AhLeahIris
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 12:31pmOh this whole thing is ridiculous, particularly when you think about the GOPs response: http://wp.me/p1HGwx-1Qe
Report Post »Steelhead
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 1:07pmno we should change the rules in the middle of the contest just to keep Newt from crying again.
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 1:51pmYes We should listen to Rusthead, a friend to R’s and Conservatives Everywhere
Report Post »gogogoff
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 12:20pmYou lost, get over it, if they do over turn this, then they should refund to the Romney/Paul camps the cost of getting the 10k, cost in time and money.
Report Post »OlefromMN
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 12:32pmDo you really want just Paul & Romneycare on the ballot in VA? Wow, what a choice!
Report Post »gogogoff
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 12:45pmNo one had a problem with the laws in 2008, if we are to be a REPUBLIC we must have laws, and we must honor those laws.
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 1:14pmOlefromMN
Report Post »Who are you speaking to? That’s up to the people of VA and the People of VA have already spoken. Is there no states rights left? Is the Constitution dead? These 4 Candidates are campaigning against what they are doing. They want a Judge to make law for the people of Virginia. Just 4 elitist thinking their above the rules of VA.
OlefromMN
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 2:26pm@COMMONSENSE
I posed a question for the VA voters. If they are comfortable with just 2 choices and no write-in ability, sobeit!
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 3:29pmOlefromMN
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 12:32pm
Do you really want just Paul & Romneycare on the ballot in VA? Wow, what a choice!
================================================
You sound like an advocate for socialism….
Your candidate didn’t “win”….so you need to change the rules of the game in order to accommodate them….
Spread the wealth!
Report Post »bikerr
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 12:17pmLet’s just get the voting over with and defeat the libs in 2012.
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 12:17pmStrange….
Nobody was complaining about this rule during the 2008 Virginia GOP primary….
So what’s different this time around?
Report Post »NOBALONEY
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 12:08pmThe plot thickens.
Report Post »