Fox Affiliate Refers to Neo-Nazis as ‘Civil Rights Group’
- Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:00pm by
Erica Ritz
- Print »
- Email »
A Fox affiliate in Orlando reported Saturday on a “civil rights group” that was making its presence known in Sanford, Florida. The group? A National Socialist Movement “neo-nazi” organization.
“There’s another civil rights group in town,” reporter Jennifer Bisram said without a hint of irony, “the national socialist organization.”
The Southern Poverty Law Center described this “civil rights group”:
The National Socialist Movement (NSM) is one of the largest and most prominent neo-Nazi groups in the United States. The group is notable for its violent anti-Jewish rhetoric, its racist views and its policy allowing members of other racist groups to join NSM while remaining members of other groups. Until 2007, NSM members protested in full Nazi uniforms, now traded in for black “Battle Dress Uniforms.” [...]
The group openly idolizes Adolf Hitler, described in NSM propaganda as, “Our Fuhrer, the beloved Holy Father of our age … a visionary in every respect.” NSM says only heterosexual “pure-blood whites” should be allowed U.S. citizenship and that all nonwhites should be deported, regardless of legal status. As [one] put it: “The Constitution was written by white men alone. Therefore, it was intended for whites alone.”
Whoops!
The affiliate realized its mistake soon after the report. An online story referring to the group was replaced, with “civil rights group” becoming “neo-nazi group.” The new story also does not include the original video.
An editor’s note at the end of the new story explains: “The report originally published Saturday inadvertently referred to the National Socialist Movement as a civil rights group. We intended to refer to them as a ‘self-proclaimed’ civil rights group.”
(H/T: Mediabistro)






















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (81)
hempstead1944
Posted on April 10, 2012 at 8:16amNo more, no less than the New Black Panther Party is a civil rights organization. Not a nano hair’s difference between the two.
Report Post »TheLiberalsAreComing
Posted on April 10, 2012 at 5:41pmDitto.
Report Post »bigspike
Posted on April 10, 2012 at 6:07ami would consider them equivalent to the New Black Panther Party
Report Post »johnjamison
Posted on April 10, 2012 at 8:09amIf the black panthers can be refer to as a civil rights groups and not militant racist group then the same can be said for the neo-nazis.
Report Post »Jaycen
Posted on April 10, 2012 at 10:14amThat’s because they are the same as the NBP. And the idiot who posted below you takes the attitude of “if they can do it, so can we!”
God, what will we do?
Report Post »ferdnerkel
Posted on April 10, 2012 at 3:09pmNot only the New Black Panthers but lets not forget the “Rainbow Coalition” either. Any group that uses rhetoric to inflame the passions of any race can and should be included in the same category.
Report Post »babylonvi
Posted on April 10, 2012 at 12:59amHey, Erica, the “neo-nazi” group is just as much a civil rights organization as the New Black Panther Party is.
Report Post »milez5
Posted on April 10, 2012 at 3:34amRegardless of what type of group these guys are it is disturbing to see The Blaze quote the southern poverty law center whose name is almost a total lie—well are are really located in the south.
Report Post »Other than that they are a radical leftist group that has nothing at all to do with the law and they sure as hell are not in poverty.
FreeUlysses
Posted on April 10, 2012 at 12:27amWhat’s pretty nutty about his whole story, is that the incident happened in a mixed neighborhood with less than 43% whites. That’s a majority of minorities. The two involved in the clash were both minorities, one a Latino, the other Black. And yet, NBPanthers wants to kill white folk over it. WTF?
Report Post »Jaycen
Posted on April 10, 2012 at 12:36amThanks, man. That was the context and real story missing from this “re-blog” of a flub of a story by Erica Ritz.
Who cares if Fox News makes a mistake and then corrects it….wait, yep. That’s news. Unfortunately, the fact that a news organization made a dumb mistake and corrected it is actually news.
What was I thinking?
Report Post »SpeckledPup
Posted on April 10, 2012 at 12:14amcalling neo-nazis a ”civil rights group” is the SAME as calling the NBP a “civil rights group”.
being white pro-Americans, we have a thought…
Report Post »when the obama-incited obama-led black on white race war hits “your” neighborhood, do you really want to chance it trying to reason for your family’s lives with a mob of mindless screaming hooting flailing ”new black panthers” who see nothing but a blood-soaked excuse to finally torture and murder whites ….(Haiti, March 1805, the blacks there murdered every single white man, woman AND child AND infant on the island.. the white women were tortured, mutilated and barely kept alive to be raped for days right upon the rotting hacked bodies of their children. ) — or do you want to look out on your lawn at a group of heavily-armed clear-thinking neo-nazi ‘soldiers’ [as stupid as THEIR own mindless hate is] …defending you?
Jaycen
Posted on April 10, 2012 at 12:33amSPECKLEDPUP, I’d turn my gun on the white racists, and tell them to go stand in the street with the black racists. And then let you go stand in the middle of them.
Damn, but you are a foolish person.
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on April 10, 2012 at 1:06amIf the Constitution would simply have been enforced… placing Segregationists on Trial in Federal Courts… there would have been no need for Civil Rights Laws… which created a Permanent Minority Status, dividing the Population… and which results in Racial Tensions, forever!
Report Post »MammalOne
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 11:35pmCan someone remind me what was “civil” about the Nazi party?
Report Post »Constantine Ivanov
Posted on April 10, 2012 at 12:23am1. The word “Nazi” is often used simply as a word-bugaboo, without referring to its real content – National Socialism.
As with any Socialism, whether it’s German National Socialism or Jewish Zionist Socialism or Soviet International Socialism, its adherents and ideologists and ideologues ALWAYS talk about “civil rights.”
So, from this theoretico-philosophical standpoint, it’s true – NAZI is about “civil rights.”
A completely different story is what Socialists understand under civil rights.
French Socialism forefathers understood civil rights as something that could be equally spread among those whom they did not guillotine yet (the guillotined individuals who in eyes of Revolutionaries didn’t deserve any civil rights, constituted over 40,000.)
I am kidding…almost.
2. As one who lived under Commies 50 years, I am always wondering: why the heck Americans are scared of National Socialism but vote for the International Socialism?
Report Post »National Socialism has its arms up to ears in Jewish, Gypsies, ill people’s blood.
But the volume of that blood is significantly smaller that the blood on arms of International Socialists (Bolsheviks).
So, why the heck Americans keep being scared of National Socialism, but “bravely (aka brainlessly) keep voting for adherents of International Socialism? It’s “beyond my pay grade,” as the obama-in-Chief used to say.
Jaycen
Posted on April 10, 2012 at 12:39am@Constantine Ivanov
Another important aspect that’s often left out – it was the National Socialist Worker’s Party. It started as a Union movement.
It’s hilarious to hear people say Hitler was anti-union. He wasn’t. He forced all unions members to join HIS union.
Report Post »MammalOne
Posted on April 10, 2012 at 1:06amSocialists can call their doctrine “civil rights” all they want but it doesn’t make it so. How many times did George Bush use the phrase “protecting our freedom” when talking about the Patriot Act? It’s doublethink in action.
Report Post »Constantine Ivanov
Posted on April 10, 2012 at 1:10am@JAYCEN:
Report Post »You’re right about Workers (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, or The National Socialist German Workers’ Party) and Unions.
Sorry, I was in a hurry.
Constantine Ivanov
Posted on April 10, 2012 at 1:21am@MAMMALONE:
On one hand, you’re right: Socialism and civil rights are not much compatible notions. I wrote about it.
On the other hand, regarding your rejection of the Patriot Act:
Report Post »I remember many real cases in the USSR (where I lived 50 years) when somebody called the Militsia (Soviet kind of Police) asking for help or prevention of a potential crime.
A usual answer always was this: “Did they kill you? No? Come when they will kill you.”
Do you think I am joking? No. It was a very sad truth. As you see – no “patriot act.”
And I recall several deaths that happened just because of the said situation. Is this what you want?
Don’t blame Bush for his sometimes botched and/or clumsy attempts to save American lives. Even if he sometimes made some mistakes, at least he loved/loves America. Unlike the obama-in-Chief.
MammalOne
Posted on April 10, 2012 at 2:28am@CONSTANTINE
Report Post »I see where you‘re coming from but there’s a difference between wanting a competent crime prevention/protection organization and a government that collects data on every move you make and every word you say and is willing to throw out our freedom in the name of bigger government and perceived safety. Of course I don‘t want a police force that doesn’t respond to my calls or an FBI that doesn‘t investigate legitimate threats but that doesn’t mean we need such extreme measures to be safe.
You give too much credit to Bush calling his words “clumsy” – I believe it was a deliberate doublethink argument. Bush lied many times to the American people, this is not a controversial view to take, you can watch every speech he gave in the lead up to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The bill may protect our lives or our property but the patriot act by its very nature does not protect our “freedom”.
Constantine Ivanov
Posted on April 11, 2012 at 4:23pm@MAMMALONE:
You accuse Bush of the Patriot Act and of “deliberate doublethink.”
Well, what prevented you from mentioning the fact that in May 12011, Obama signed the Patriot Act extension after many liberal Democrats support it?
Unfortunately, the Blaze consistently blocks my response to you regarding freedom.
Report Post »Thus, to say very short: try to honestly and thoroughly analyze your everyday life and tell yourself what freedom are you talking about?
There is no such thing as unlimited freedom, it’s just a poor imagination. Unlimited freedom is worse than anarchy: it is CHAOS.
So, any society must set some restrictions. America has them more than many other countries: count how many laws and rules we have. Some are clearly excessive, though.
The Patriot Act you blame was just one of those – maybe excessive, maybe proper – restrictions.
marybethelizabeth
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 10:14pmThis is the New Civil Rights Movement for white people that Mr. Beck called for on his radio show February 16th, after saying on February 15th that maybe blacks were discriminated against once but now the pendulum has swung too far in their favor.
Report Post »Jaycen
Posted on April 10, 2012 at 12:29amNope, they’re your best buddies. They’re Socialists, just like you, MBE. They’re just honest about their principles.
Be proud, MBE, be proud to be who you are. Stand with your bretheren and tell us what you really think. These guys are Socialists. Like you, they’re collectivists. They want the same world you want.
Report Post »FloridaFarmGirl
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 9:00pmWhatever you are and whoever you are, stay out of Florida!! We have had more than enough “help” from all of the transplants, northerners, etc. Take I-95 north back to wherever you came from and leave us alone, we were quite happy before all of y’all. Thank you so much!!
Report Post »KangarooJack
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 11:11pmIt’s Spring…the snowbirds are traveling back North. Yet, don’t think you might be referring to the Senior Invasion? lol
Report Post »sillyfreshness
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 8:50pmThey are every bit as much a civil rights group as the NAACP, Black Panters, Jesse Jackson, and Al Sharpton.
Report Post »Mr. Oshawott
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 8:48pmNeo Nazis…A civil rights group? You got to be kidding me. I just don’t see how promoting and justifying racism would be befitting to a civil rights group. That would be like viewing the New Black Panther Party as a civil rights group for their “Black Liberation” ideology. There’s no mistaking it: both the Neo Nazi Party and the New Black Panther Party are seriously dangerous groups that only want to keep America polarized through the use of their racial hatred. If these two groups were really for promoting civil rights, they would understand that natural rights and equal justice exist for ALL people, REGARDLESS of their color.
Report Post »decendentof56
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 9:00pmMr “O”…….
Report Post »If indeed the Neo’s are even in Sanford (and there is some doubt in my mind), then would you be surprised?
I mean….the race conversation has been so very one-sided for so long that people have had more than enough. We (I’m White) are going to fight back….and with a vengence. It will be ugly.
You just cannot sweep the overt racism from blacks under the rug any longer. It has been out in the open for decades. The race pimps, Obama-Holder-Waters-SJ Lee, all of them have done a good job. Enough!
Mr. Oshawott
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 9:46pm@Decendantof56
“You just cannot sweep the overt racism from blacks any longer. It has been out in the open for decades.”
You’ve grossly misread my statement. NOWHERE within it did I defend the New Black Panther Party’s unjustifiable use of racism. I’ve just mentioned that both the Neo Nazi Party AND THE NEW BLACK PANTHER PARTY are both DANGEROUS groups that only want to spread their racial hatred to keep America polarized; hence, I would view this part of your statement as a straw-man argument.
Report Post »mr.goodvibe
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 8:43pmAnd all loyal Alex Jones fans!
Report Post »Dosrios
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 8:36pmChurchill remarked after being questioned about allying with Stalin to defeat Hitler,
“I would ally with the Devil to defeat a greater evil.”
I wouldn’t associate with neo-Nazis personally, but I welcome their countering of animals who blatantly and without fear of censure offer a monetary reward for the capture or killing of a white man who has not been accused by the law of wrongdoing.
Report Post »Gourdy
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 8:43pmI really don’t think you want to sing the praises of Nazis, either neo or original. Remember that Hitler was responsible for killing millions of white people. The Black Panthers are street theater and clowns for the most part.
Report Post »Dosrios
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 8:47pmGourdy – you would benefit from a reading comprehension course.
Probably not.
My analogy, from Churchill’s remark, was that Nazis WERE the Devil.
Public education product ?
Report Post »euragone
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 8:49pmI have to agree with you!
Report Post »Joker50
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 8:11pmWhere is a counter article about the New Black Panthers? They are a Neo-Racist group. They stand for only thew Black man, Whites have no place in their world.
Report Post »Gourdy
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 8:21pmDude, the story is in the Hot Topics section on The Blaze homepage. The white man is in good hand here!
Report Post »blackyb
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 8:01pmReckon they will smooze, these two opposing groups? I am not looking for it, but stranger things could happened. Look how we got this big eared President who does not know there is a whole country of people besides the factions he represents. This “father” of our country might be one of those lurid people who prostitutes their own children (the U.S.citizen occupiers) to be fools for other countries’ governments. These fools enable foreign countries to gain credibility in their failed methods of government by allowing this country to emulate their type governments. We would fail too, of course, but that is not the worry of this President. It seems the goal is to enable him and his to have more control. This is not what Americans died for. Our people died for Freedom and Liberty that gives rights granted by our Creator not by the government.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:36pmJust goes to show that the MSM holds an extreme monopoly over words that can be used to portray whatever they want to the public at large.
Report Post »blackyb
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:25pmEveryone likes a level playing field, or do they? Something is better than nothing.
Report Post »jdawg
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:25pmThe Sanford PD says they have no reports of this group in town, at all, and the Fox report never showed any of the group in Sanford – very suspicious.
http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-spokane/sanford-police-no-reports-of-armed-neo-nazis-patrolling-town
Report Post »AB5r
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:22pmThere is something quaint about the way people get all worked up over neo-nazis but don’t bat an eye at Muslim groups. Muhammad was worse than Hitler in anti-semitism, both in the texts they wrote, Mein Kampf contains LESS anti-Jew hatred than the Koran and Hadith, and Muhammad accomplished in Arabia what Hitler failed to do in Germany, make the country free of Jews. So who is really kidding who, and especially after 9/11 why does this double standard continue?
Report Post »blackyb
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:36pmWe are batting eyes here. You just do not see or hear it. LOL
Report Post »charlie blackmon
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:20pmWhite racists , black racist , whats the difference ? Racist is racist , there is only one race the human race , with all it’s glorious hues , tints and colors . Time we start judging each other , not by the color of a persons skin , but by the content of a persons character .
Report Post »Exrepublisheep
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:28pmGood luck with that Charlie.
Report Post »Gourdy
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:39pmI agree completely, Charlie. I know it’s easy for people to think of such ideas as naive, but timeless leaders like Jesus, Buddha, MLK, jr., and Ghandi to name a few based their lives on them. You’re in good company!
Report Post »charlie blackmon
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:40pmexrepublisheep i know , it didn’t work out all that well for MLK , either , but i have to beleive that it is so
Report Post »Burby
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 8:17pmCharlie, you are so correct. I believe we already do as you say we should, it is just there are no ratings for the media to report stories of people helping people, people enjoying people. The rating come from racist issues, heavy crime etc. I guess that is why they once called this the “News”.
Today, the amount of crime is so much, (regardless if the #’s show other wise), many no longer watch or read the news, many that do, do so for entertainment purposes. Sad huh?
We must never give up though, life is to beautiful to not live it, humanity is to great to give up on it.
What does trouble me though, is all that is taking place in Sanford, from these public announcements by the panthers wanting violence, blood, the amount of racial remarks, & the bounty offered, the armed Neo Nazis patrolling the streets of Sanford to the protesters blocking the entrance into the police station this morning & we hear nothing from obama & clan, nothing from the Gov of Fla bringing in the National Guard to break up these groups & make the needed arrest, physical threats, domestic terrorism, racial claims, public bounty, these things are illegal, & yet we hear nothing, why?
Report Post »Is it because as believed obama wants this to explode so he can call martial law to not have the elections held so he can remain president? –=hmm, something to consider eh?
Beck was warning of this taking place over the summer as we neared the elections, I believe he was right, yet again…
decendentof56
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 8:21pmCharlie……
Report Post »You have to get over the idea that all people can co-exist. Not going to happen, my friend. Ever.
decendentof56
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 8:29pm@Burby…….”we hear nothing from obama & clan”
Burby…..And you are surprised?
Report Post »Did you hear anything from BHO or E Holder when blacks indiscriminately attacked Whites at a Wisconsin Fair last summer?
Did you hear anything when blacks were attacking Whites in Philly last year?
Did the NBP get prosecuted at the Philly polling location in the ‘08 election?
And more recently….have they issued any warnings to the NBP’s or anyone else for death threats?
THE ANSWER PLEASE……Burby?
decendentof56
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 8:50pmPeople should not be integrated by the government, either state or local. That must be a natural evolution. Here in NJ we have the miserable Mt Laurel decisions of the 70′s. In that decision, municipalities are forced to provide 15% of any new housing development to “affordable” housing. Muni’s also have to submit a master plan for development (as a municipality) and include mandated “affordable” housing quota’s, irrespective of any individual developments.
So…..my question to anyone is, if you move by judical mandate -instead of natural evolution- any group who have been radicalized by agitators such as the NBP or A Sharpton into a middle to upper middle-class neighborhood, what happens? Lets say those new neighbors you have want to play loud music, have Pit-Bulls they have trained to attack, sell drugs, walk around with hoodies, rob your home, or break into your car.
Report Post »What do you do then?
Do you move?
Should you have to?
Lets say you do move.
And your neighbors move.
And their neighbor moves.
And the neighborhood becomes a slum, like every town with lawless, hoodied rabble-rousers.
Does the municipality gain or lose tax revenue?
Did those “affordable” mandates help or hurt the municipality?
Those once nice…well manicured neighborhoods will become gang-infested slums.
Homes will be abandoned.
Crime will rise.
And all you wussie, PC Whites know it!
Wyld_goose
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:17pmI agree calling them a “white civil rights” group seemed a bit odd, with only 2 clicks could see clearly this group was Nazi affiliated. Just looking at there flag, and reading some of their articles.
But why does The New Black Panthers get to be called a “civil rights” group when they are clearly a black supremacy/segregate group?
Report Post »blackyb
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:24pmApparently they have not checked the expiration dates on their race cards. It may be up.
Report Post »Gourdy
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:30pmWyld, The SPLC doesn’t call them a civil rights group — I’m not sure who does other than the Black Panthers and its handful of supporters. This is from the SPLC website:
“The New Black Panther Party is a virulently racist and anti-Semitic organization whose leaders have encouraged violence against whites, Jews and law enforcement officers.”
Report Post »decendentof56
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 8:52pmGoose…..
Report Post »You just answered your own question.
Gourdy
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:12pm“Civil rights group” translates to “Fox’s viewer base.” This is not entirely surprising.
Report Post »Baikonur
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:15pmWhat was it the Simpsons said? ‘Fox news–not racist, but #1 among racists.’
Report Post »blackyb
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:22pmTwo opposing fanatical groups ought to level the playing field. Now the rest of us can just sit back and watch them lash each other to death with rhetoric.
Report Post »grimmy
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:35pm@baikonur aka encinom.
Report Post »You are the only racist ive seen on here….
blackyb
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:42pmYes, I suppose we really need to keep up with cartoons to know what the truth of life is…Duh????
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 8:40pmBAIKONUR clean your ears out………the Nazis think are a civil rights group
Report Post »cristo52
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:10pmObviously the reporter doesn’t know what the National Socialists are. And I think we can assume she was not alarmed, otherwise she would have asked the police department for confirmation of these patrols. Police has confirmed that to the best of their knowledge the National Socialists are NOT paroling the streets of Sanford, Florida. When will “journalists” learn to confirm stories before they run with them? Talking to someone from Detroit on the phone is not enough.
Report Post »blackyb
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:35pmNext will come the sheets. Muffled voices trying to curse all who are not the same shade…..unless a few of the shades are hiding beneath the coverings. These are the days of wars within war rooms, so no one really knows what anyone is doing. Isn’t it amazing? Such a total loss of control for all those seeking to control the uncontrolable United States of America whose people are Under God whether they like it or not.
Report Post »VIGILANTE NfdL
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:09pmCome on, Blaze;
Report Post »Quoting the SPLC? Nothing will get me to stop turning to you guys for news and views faster than quoting these haters as though there is some value in it.
VIGILANTE NfdL
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:16pmAsking the SLPC to comment on the story makes The Blaze look about as naive as the Fox reporter who described the Neo-Nazis a ‘civil rights group.
Report Post »blackyb
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:39pmWell, just from the standpoint of this civilian, these are about as civil as the other group. They also have civil rights to gather. In their own eyes, perhaps they are practicing their own civil rights. So that makes them a civil rights groups in their own right.
Report Post »kentuckypatriot
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:07pmGreat, now all the sheeple in Sanford will blame the Tea Party!
Report Post »VanceUppercut
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:27pm@kentuckypatriot
Me and my buddy here have a bet on how many teeth you have. I say three, he says one. Help us settle this and I’ll slip you a fin.
Report Post »blackyb
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:28pmWell, why not. Everyone loves a good Tea Party blaming. It keeps the name out there and the Truth wins out in the end. The real Tea Party are definitely closer to the Truth unless they get hijacked than what has been dirtying up this country.
Report Post »Mr. Oshawott
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 9:12pm@BlackyB
“The real Tea Party are definitely closer to the truth unless they get hijacked…”
Well, BlackyB, I have news for you: The Tea Party movement has ALREADY been hijacked. The GOP establishment, INCLUDING Glenn Beck, have been controlling the movement since three years earlier.
Sources:
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCtW3Z3fnqQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bNiDx7qTjA&feature=related
mercenary4freedom
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 9:35pmPlease VANCEUPPERCUT, we don’t want to know what you & your buddy do in the bedroom.
Report Post »kentuckypatriot
Posted on April 10, 2012 at 7:02amHey Vance:
Report Post »Kiss my white A##. Just because I live in KY certainly DOES NOT mean I’m some redneck hillbilly that the elitists seem to think. How many advanced degrees do you have? I’d say none, since your ignorance is really showing. Furthermore, I live in a state where we cherish our freedoms, our guns and our religion, unlike you who take everything for granted. Go to hell moron.
SoupSammich
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:03pmSo they could be just a bunch of albino Panters after all. Huh. That is a mighty big tent the old D is putting up.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 7:58pmIf the New Black Panthers is a “civil rights group” .. then so are these .. they are both racist.
Report Post »mr.goodvibe
Posted on April 9, 2012 at 8:42pmDamn, you beat me to it!
Report Post »