French Lawmaker Under Fire After Claiming Gays Manipulate Media & Are Causing Mankind to ‘Lose its Dignity’
- Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:00pm by
Billy Hallowell
- Print »
- Email »
French President Nicolas Sarkozy
PARIS (The Blaze/AP) — President Nicolas Sarkozy’s party said Wednesday it is kicking out a legislator who said gay people hold too much sway in France and downplayed the persecution of gays during World War II.
The comments by lawmaker Christian Vanneste unleashed an outpouring of criticism from left and right, and embarrassed Sarkozy’s conservative party just as the unpopular president was expected to announce that he will seek a second term in upcoming elections.
Vanneste looks set to lose his spot in the UMP party and his parliament seat over the remarks — harsh ramifications for what many see as offensive and incendiary commentary.
French lawmaker Christian Vanneste
In a video broadcast on a French website, Vanneste said gays are “at the heart of power” in France, manipulating the media and making humankind “lose its dignity.”
He said the media overplays “the famous legend of the deportation of homosexuals” from Nazi-occupied France, saying German gays were sent to concentration camps, but “there was no homosexual deportation in France.”
Gay rights groups denounced him and UMP members said he had crossed a line. Vanneste, responding Wednesday to the uproar, said he was being unfairly targeted by a “gay lobby.”
UMP chief Jean-Francois Cope said Wednesday that Vanneste would be expelled because of his “deeply shocking and intolerable comments.”
The party will finalize the decision at a meeting next week, Cope said. Vanneste could no longer be the UMP’s candidate for parliament from his district in northern France in legislative elections in June.
Vanneste has made remarks seen as disparaging to gays in the past, but touched a particularly sensitive chord by referring to World War II.
It was 1995 before France’s then-President Jacques Chirac acknowledged the nation’s responsibility for the deportation of Jews during the war. Denying the Holocaust is a crime punishable by prison and fines in France, and some critics accused Vanneste of negationism.
Nazi Germany declared homosexuality an aberration that threatened the German race, and thousands of gay men were sent to concentration camps, where few survived.
In France the numbers were much lower, according to the author of a book on deportation of French homosexuals. Mickael Bertrand says on his blog that exact figures are hard to pin down, but that his research found 62 French people were deported for being gay.
Wednesday‘s uproar puts Sarkozy’s party in a tough spot as he seeks to garner support from the far right to bolster his weak chances for his presidential campaign.
Polls put Sarkozy in a distant second behind Socialist candidate Francois Hollande ahead of the April and May elections, with far right candidate Marine Le Pen in a close third.
Sarkozy opposes gay marriage, though recent polls suggest a majority of French voters support it. Vanneste is part of the influential hard-right wing of Sarkozy’s party.
“He is speaking of homosexuals like they spoke of Jews in the 1930s, speaking of a kind of lobby that infiltrates the media … that has no place in the UMP, those are not our values,” Emmanuel Blanc, the president of GayLib, a gay rights group affiliated with the UMP, said on France-Info radio.
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 690 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 484 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 375 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 337 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 324 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 310 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 324 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 224 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 148 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 310 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (159)
Alan
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 12:42amI have no idea about persecution of gays during World War II but the gays are certainly persecuting everyone who dares to disagree with or disapprove of them.
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 2:34amExactly. Look at what happened to Pastor Ake Green in Sweden when he condemned homosexuality in 2008.
Report Post »girlnurse
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 3:30amLook at what happened to Frank Turek just because he believes marriage to be between and man and woman it got him fired from his job at CISCO!
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFCG6S5CJ8U&feature=player_detailpage
smithclar3nc3
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 7:28amThis is why we have wars it’s to silence those voices. The longer they are allowed to go unchecked the louder and stronger they get . Until one day it’s your voice that is silenced by them. It’s not rocket surgery human nature is always the same domination is always the end goal. Just look at what the communist and socialist are doing to this country because we stop what McCarthy knew had to be done. They crippled the economy,inundated Washington on every level,and are destroy independence and the things that made America great. There’s no way around this at some point blood will have to be shed on a grand level. The Constitution and free men will prevail.
Report Post »To quote a brave man from my state
Give me liberty or give me death.
@leftfighter
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 9:14amre: persecution, Anytime you cite God’s word on the subject, it goes to denegration of Faith & descends from there:
-”God’s word is clear. Homosexuality is an abomination in His eyes.”
-”Oh yeah? The Bible also says cotton/ploy blend is too!”
-”Uh- polyester is an oil byproduct not invented until the 1940′s. That’s a Red Herring.”
-”Stop judging me!”
-”I’m not judging, just keeping in line with Lev 19:17. ‘Rebuke your neighbor frankly so you will not share in his sin.’ ”
-”Don’t quote the bible at me, you hatemonger!”
-”The first part of that verse says ‘Do not hate your brother in your heart.‘ I don’t hate you & haven’t said anything hateful towards you. If I hated you, I’d let you go on to die in sin; I wouldn‘t be sharing God’s word with you. I’m quoting Him. Do you think He hates you?”
-”Well, if you know the Bible so well, what was Jesus’ greatest commandment?”
-”You’re not seriously saying “love your neighbor” refers to homosexual sex, are you?
“No- I…”
“Didn’t Jesus also say in Mat 5:17 that He didn’t come abolish the Law?”
“Yeah, but-”
“You realize that means all of the Scripture speaking against homosexuality, like Gen 19, Lev 18:22 & 20:13?”
-”Don‘t twist verses’ meanings! 1 Cor 6:11 says I can be gay and still be sanctified, you homophobe!”
-”As Jesus Himself said about all sin, but you’re first required to repent. Luke 13:3.”
“AARRGGHH!!! I’m done with this bigot!”
That conversation w
Report Post »@leftfighter
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 9:19amuh- why did the Blaze cut off the last part of my post? It was under 1500…
Well, the last part said:
That conversation was yesterday.
As to Media Manipulation, look no further than LOGO, Bravo, MTV, a friendly News Media, and Hollywierd.
(That was the full text before I edited it down to 1500). ;-)
Report Post »wrecklessdischarge
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 12:46pmMaybe this guy is a jerk I dont know but didnt he get proved right. He says gays hold to much sway and power in France then has his carreer ruined for it. Sounds like the people he offended certainly do weild power.
Report Post »Patriotic_Mercenary
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 10:17pm@directoratasmallbusiness
I respectfully disagree with you concerning the eunuch. The eunuch was NOT a homosexual in any way, shape or form. The common practice and understanding is, they were men who had received prepubescent castration. This caused him to develop without various masculine traits.
Eunuchs performed a wide variety of functions in many different cultures: courtiers or equivalent domestics, treble singers, religious specialists, government officials, military commanders, and guardians of women or harem servants.
They were regarded as safe for some of these duties due to their inability to procreate. Alternatively, “eunuch” may refer to a man who is not castrated but who is impotent or celibate.
In the Old Testament, homosexuality is an abomination that will not be tolerated within society. With the New Testament, sinners are allowed to repent of this abomination. That means that they will seek forgiveness and not do the act any longer. Our society has mistakenly allowed these sinners to force their perversion into the mainstream to the point where it is considered “acceptable”.
While I disagree with people persecuting homosexuals, I also don’t think they should be flaunting what they do in their private lives in the public forum. Is it just and right for people that are into various other perversions to do so as well? How about Dominatrix? Sadism-Masochism? Or, even worse yet, Ba’al-like worship of Scat?
Report Post »Plublican
Posted on February 17, 2012 at 4:02pmIsn’t that the truth? So, can no one express a difference of opinion with them and not suffer terrible consequences???
Report Post »Airgun
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 12:35am@ubethechange
Report Post »Sigh….you know what ube?
You sound like a decent human being- a sinner, but ain’t we all.
My beef comes from the deliberate blurring of the lines between the sexes.
When you use the term “gay” to describe homosexuals, you are unwittingly (maybe) engaging in activism aimed at “norming” homosexual behavior.
This irks me, because there is a definite politically correct agenda attached to the ”’gay” pride movement that insists that such behavior is normal and natural.
I’m just one guy, and don’t expect to change the world with my opinion, nor do I shove my beliefs down anyone’s throat- you do what you do, and answer to God for it.
I will say this regarding the public perception and “education” regarding homosexuality in America:
You have exactly as much right to teach my child that homosexuality is normal as I have to teach YOUR child that it isn’t.
That’s equality, but an activist will insist that it’s just hatefilled rhetoric.
When you throw out a loaded question like you did, would you expect anyone to say ” ME! ME! I’d gas them all right now!”
If not, then your simply baiting good people looking for a fight, which makes you a troll.
If you are as decent as you sound, then don‘t enter a thread asking people if they’ve stopped beating their wife, OK dude?
Just sayin’……..
SoupSandwich
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 3:27pmMan, that was well said. I read a lot of crap, write some too, but that was well put.
Report Post »Directoratasmallbusiness
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 8:12pmYou know some of you people who call yourself Christians need to know the Bible a little better and to know that people are born “gay.” As a Christian let me tell you that Jesus taught the “New Covenant” and never mentioned homosexuality. Let me paraphrase something for you. Acts 8:37-39 This man happened to be reading the prophet Isaiah. Philip explained to him that the person Isaiah was talking about was Jesus Christ, and this good news moved him to the core. They come up on some water. Now, remember, this is in the desert. There is no water in the desert. Luke, who wrote this, felt this was a “God-thing.” And the eunuch asked Philip “What is to prevent me from being baptized?” It’s an interesting way to phrase the question, but yes, there was something. The law, the fact that he was sexually unfit. But Philip was shaped more by the Spirit than by the law; more by the love of Jesus Christ than the legalism of Moses. And Philip baptized the eunuch and the eunuch went on his way rejoicing. A eunuch was a homosexual, FYI.
Report Post »As a person in the upper 3 percent of the most educated people in the world let me tell you some other things. Homosexuality was not a word until 1869 – that is the 19th FYI. King James Bible had 47 translators 300 years ago. Also, people’s sexuality is determined at the ages of 5-6. I could go on and on but only 1500 characters. Study that…..if you are not too stupid!
Patriotic_Mercenary
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 10:19pm@directoratasmallbusiness
I respectfully disagree with you concerning the eunuch. The eunuch was NOT a homosexual in any way, shape or form. The common practice and understanding is, they were men who had received prepubescent castration. This caused him to develop without various masculine traits.
Eunuchs performed a wide variety of functions in many different cultures: courtiers or equivalent domestics, treble singers, religious specialists, government officials, military commanders, and guardians of women or harem servants.
They were regarded as safe for some of these duties due to their inability to procreate. Alternatively, “eunuch” may refer to a man who is not castrated but who is impotent or celibate.
In the Old Testament, homosexuality is an abomination that will not be tolerated within society. With the New Testament, sinners are allowed to repent of this abomination. That means that they will seek forgiveness and not do the act any longer. Our society has mistakenly allowed these sinners to force their perversion into the mainstream to the point where it is considered “acceptable”.
While I disagree with people persecuting homosexuals, I also don’t think they should be flaunting what they do in their private lives in the public forum. Is it just and right for people that are into various other perversions to do so as well? How about Dominatrix? Sadism-Masochism? Or, even worse yet, Ba’al-like worship of Scat?
Report Post »One Man Progressive Wrecking Crew
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 12:26amThe Gay Gestapo Marches lockstep Jackbooted and ready to rumble for their “One Percent” which is about the REAL number of homosexuals across the globe much less America. Their numbers are nowhere near their claims and we all saw that with our own eyes over and over as these gay marriage deals petered out like nothing.
I think at the most populated ‘ceremonies’ there were a thousand couples at the most. That‘s a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of one percent of the world’s cross of ‘married couples’, when THAT yardstick is used. Some had mere dozens. That’s a cult, not a movement or sexual preference.
But the way the Media and GG (Gay Gestapo) propagandize you‘d think their numbers were in the millions and they’re nowhere near it.
YET.. But now they’ve infiltrated the military, elementary and high schools, the colleges were lost 20 years ago and they got a butthold (as opposed to foothold) in Congress or at least DID, and they’re on the march. I’m sorry but I consider the Gay movement a grave threat to our society as great as anything we face.
When morality is gone, trust is gone, and when trust is gone, freedom is gone. It doesn’t work when no one top down or bottom up can be trusted anymore…. or at least for now.
Report Post »Nemo13
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 12:03amGay people need to stop using the rainbow as their flag. It is a rainbow, not a *** flag. Just like that group to take something wonderful and profane it.
Report Post »One Man Progressive Wrecking Crew
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 12:42amAGREED!!! That robs the children of one of their favorite things and frankly many people resent their “hijacking” as you accurately describe it as of these children‘s things and that’s how they indoctrinate them initially. Then it’s touchy feely cartoony stuff added with a little “Modern MO History” here and there, (which fits on the head of a thimble by the way..Rock Hudson, Liberace, Hollywood goes off the ledge, Class over.) and that’s the beginning recipe of a homosexual cult member.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 8:17amIt’s worse than that, they have taken symbol of one of God’s covenants with man and used it to represent something God hates.
Report Post »@leftfighter
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 9:15am@Gonzo
Right on the head, brother. Right on the head.
Preach on!
Report Post »kalli
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:58pmPeople who don‘t believe this can’t handle the truth!
Report Post »shimauma
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:54pmWHOOT!! the French finally standing for decency! Bravo!
Report Post »Walkabout
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 6:06pmI always hate it when gays quip that they find regular intercourse disgusting. I guess that means women are disgusting. So half our population is disgusting? They have no dignity?
Gays make a mockery of science, society & religion.
So yes they try to take away the dignity of civilization.
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:43pmVIVA Vanneste!
Report Post »shimauma
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:55pm2nd THAT!
Report Post »omgfolks
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:22pmYou know I didn’t even bother to read it, He is entitled to his opinion and I accept is position on the matter. To many people will jump all over this passing judgement and crying foul because a man voiced his own opinon, it is ok for him. I mean I agree but thats beside the point,
Report Post »The Third Archon
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:12pm“Vanneste said gays are…making humankind “lose its dignity.”
Report Post »How?
JohnofOregon
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:20pmEver heard of the brown shirts?
Report Post »The Third Archon
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:25pmFunny–last time I checked the homosexuals weren’t marching people off to death camps…
Report Post »shimauma
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:53pmThey would if they could get away with it Archon
Report Post »normbal
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:55pmCan you say “glory holes?“ or ”Bath houses?” Zoo sex? Rampant spread of HIV, TB, Gonorrhea, Chlamydia, CA-MRSA, ALL focused in homosexual community. You’re animals.
Report Post »MarsBarsTru7
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 12:26amWell Archon, it’s like this – You see, there’s a story about birds and bees that most parents tell their children. It’s all about parts unique to each sex that are meant to go together. However, homosexuals get this confused and use their parts inappropriately. Thus, they’re sexual deviants, and being sexual deviants they are a downgrade for a moral society. Not to mention that they confuse children and inhibit the propagation of a people.
Personally, I believe everyone should have a right to behave in whatever sexual way suits them as adults without interference from the government. However, I do feel that it is completely reasonable for their to be backlash against the homosexual community collectively attempting to proselytize their behavior. Also, I’m against laws that prohibit people from speaking their minds concerning their views on homosexuality (or any other moral issue).
Anyway, if you’re having trouble with that birds and bees thing yourself, you may just want to pick up a human biology book
Report Post »The Third Archon
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 12:28am“They would if they could get away with it Archon”
Somehow I doubt that.
“Can you say “glory holes?“ or ”Bath houses?” Zoo sex? Rampant spread of HIV, TB, Gonorrhea, Chlamydia, CA-MRSA, ALL focused in homosexual community. You’re animals.”
Report Post »1) I love how you assume that in order to recognize the immorality of arbitrary discrimination against a population, you must be OF that population. I am attracted to women–I chose to be attracted women about as much as gay people chose to be attracted to people of the same sex.
2) What does that list have to do with you, or human civilization, or ANYONE or ANYTHING beyond the participants?
3) Promiscuity, especially reckless promiscuity, and the health risks it carries with it are neither moral facts, nor exclusive to the homosexual community.
MarsBarsTru7
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 12:43am*there
… I hate my own typos more than I hate it when I see it from others. (=_=)
Report Post »The Third Archon
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 12:43am“However, homosexuals get this confused and use their parts inappropriately.”
They’re not confused–the know exactly what they want.
“Thus, they’re sexual deviants, and being sexual deviants they are a downgrade for a moral society.”
You are confusing, and equivocating, the descriptive and normative meanings of the word “deviant.“ Merely being ”different” from the majority, or the norm, is not, in and of itself, immoral.
“Not to mention that they confuse children and inhibit the propagation of a people.”
Don’t mention it–because it’s not true. Children are what they are–most do not choose to be attracted to who they are, did you? And even if they do choose to be attracted to someone of the same, or different gender, it makes no difference.
“However, I do feel that it is completely reasonable for their to be backlash against the homosexual community collectively attempting to proselytize their behavior.”
Report Post »Asking for equal treatment is not proselytizing. Gay people neither want, nor need, to “convert people to homosexuality”–what they DO want is for people to give them the same rights and respect as heterosexual couples.
“Also, I’m against laws that prohibit people from speaking their minds concerning their views on homosexuality (or any other moral issue).”
So do I, and everyone who believes democracy is preferable to the alternatives. Voicing your mind, and codifying discriminatory laws, are two different things–you have a right to th
The Third Archon
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 12:44amthe former and not the latter.
Report Post »EschatonNow
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 1:08amThird Archon. Why do you use words like moral or immoral. You said you were an atheist so what is the basis or support for ethical or moral behavior in your universe? Also, is not an Archon a Gnostic title for a demi-urge or layer or level of creation by a supernatural being? Your reply sounds impressive but is so inconsistent and illogical. If you are correct and their is no GOD than why is sex with my adult sister wrong? For that matter, why do gay people need respect? If humans are no better or different (A judgement call) than sharks; is murder really bad or just a fact of evolution? You and I can not both be right and I want nothing to do with people like you that demand respect but don’t appear to deserve it nor have any basis or axioms to base it on!
Report Post »EschatonNow
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 1:58amHomosexuals are not born they are made. Reference the studies on identical twins and homosexuality. That said, homosexuals are humans and they deserve love and kindness not because of their behaviors but because they are our brothers and sisters and made in the image of GOD. (Note: not their behavior but their ontological spirits.) However, there is nothing arbitrary to the rejection of homosexual behavior; it is based on reason and nature as much as theological beliefs. As I wrote earlier; homosexuality is an Abomination to GOD not fellow men! Why to GOD? Because you put your own selfish pleasure before glorifying GOD. How do we glorify GOD ? By acting in conformity with his creation. How do we do that? By the complementarity of the heterosexual union. What does that mean; complemen…. what? Complementarity means in physics, general systems theory, biology …..the unitariness of opposite manifestations of a phenomenon. (see Niel Bohrs). The fact is that despite mankind’s desires and will to use birth control, abortion, and placing the pleasure of sex above the purpose of sex; GOD wants you to create more little yous to worship and love him (or her or it). Ergo, if you can’t get this stuff right (ie, create a loving mutual complementarity with the opposite sex in mutual worship of GOD) than stay celibate and worship GOD full time. Homosexuals in some ways are like alcoholics (but very different in others) and are not evil and should be treated with love but their beha
Report Post »The Third Archon
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 2:15am“Why do you use words like moral or immoral. You said you were an atheist so what is the basis or support for ethical or moral behavior in your universe?”
By morality, I understand it as a teleological theory that dictates ethics, or rules, of conduct–something all people do, consciously or not. Now, not all moralities are equal, however–some are better for human well-being than others. For me, morality is about seeking to know and do that which brings the greatest well-being to humans–this necessarily means an earnest pursuit of knowledge, and practice applying that knowledge, because like any skill morality get’s better with practice, and withers without practice. That is what it means to be moral to me, which is to seek to know and love the good, and to know the good is to do it.
By this calculus I can answer your questions as follows:
Report Post »“why is sex with my adult sister wrong?”
If it’s consensual, it isn’t–it might not be a good idea from a biological perspective (i.e. any offspring from such a union is at a much greater risk), but that has nothing to do with its moral status.
“why do gay people need respect?”
Because they are human, and their being gay doesn’t change that, or inherently hurt others.
“If humans are no better or different (A judgement call) than sharks”
Yes–almost all knowledge requires a judgment call; I’m sure you are not ignorant of the mistakes humans, whether they believe in God or not, can make in these judgments.
The Third Archon
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 2:22am“is murder really bad or just a fact of evolution?”
Report Post »Murder, wanton murder, is evil ceteris paribus (all other things being equal), because it destroys human capacity for knowledge and morality without that being’s consent or any greater gain. Does it matter WHY it’s bad, whether it is simply our ability to recognize it as wrong and anti-social, or it is God’s command? We are capable of recognizing it as such–that’s all that I care about.
“Homosexuals are not born they are made. Reference the studies on identical twins and homosexuality.”
I don’t care whether or not hey choose to be homosexual–I thought I made that clear. It makes no difference to their moral status, since the act itself, regardless of whether or not it is “voluntarily motivated” is not inherently immoral. I think you are wrong, but it’s an academic point.
“That said, homosexuals are humans and they deserve love and kindness not because of their behaviors but because they are our brothers and sisters and made in the image of GOD. ”
Or because they are human–their ontological nature, to use your own word.
“However, there is nothing arbitrary to the rejection of homosexual behavior; it is based on reason and nature as much as theological belief”
It is based solely on theological belief. Nature does not make things immoral–it takes subjects to do that.
“Because you put your own selfish pleasure before glorifying GOD”
But not heterosexuality? Even when both are in loving commit
The Third Archon
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 2:29amcommitted relationships? How do you draw the distinction between two people doing the exact same thing that they would and could do with someone of the opposite sex, in which case you assert it WOULDN’T be immoral, yet when it is with someone about the same sex, it suddenly becomes immoral. So what about the homosexual act itself (all of which, i.e. sodomy and ***********, could, and is, done by straight couples) is so different that it distracts from God when homosexuals, but not heterosexuals do it?
Report Post »“How do we glorify GOD ?”
If there is a God, then God must be more impressed by devotion to good for good’s own sake, a commitment to godly living, REGARDLESS of whether or not one has confirmation of God’s existence.
“GOD wants you to create more little yous to worship and love him (or her or it).”
Lesbians can have biological children–it is possible to create a fetus from two egg cells. But let’s put that aside. Are you SERIOUSLY arguing that having children is an inherent moral good? So are people who get vasectomies as bad as homosexuals in God’s eyes? What about sterile people? For that matter, if it‘s God’s will that everyone, homosexuals included, have children, then why ARE there sterile people?
Git-R-Done
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 2:37amI’ll bet the Third Archon had no problem with Ake Green being sent to jail in Sweden for condemning homosexuality.
Report Post »The Third Archon
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 3:35amNah, I think prison should be reserved for the most serious of offenses–violent crimes, and only to prevent the occurrence of future violent crimes. Nothing is gained by punishment for its own sake.
I don’t think people should be sent to prison JUST for expressing poorly thought out opinions that are disagreeable. Even making speech a civil offense, not necessarily a criminal one, is dangerous. In some contexts, yes, some speech is criminal–if you shout “fire” in a crowded theater, “bomb/hijack” on public transit, or are actively urging on people committing, or intent on committing immediately, violent crime, well then that speech is harmful and is criminal. But in the vast majority of cases, just expressing opinions about acts, even patently evil and violent acts (like child molestation), should not be a crime–it is action that matters.
Report Post »girlnurse
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 3:43amThis is a really good series…“Nothing gay about it”
Report Post »How same sex marriage is dangerous (proven without the bible).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcK539YHKds&feature=player_detailpage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgOOGMjdaVg&feature=player_detailpage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CggllhSbd54&feature=player_detailpage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_-y4gpnwVo&feature=player_detailpage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Dl9RdxP0rs&feature=player_detailpage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYEZgttHxYg&feature=player_detailpage
MarsBarsTru7
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 1:00pm@Archon
You really didn’t present any counter points worth addressing. As I understand it, you’re a self-professed atheist? There are things we are not going to agree on in such a case. Morality is something we do not share.
However, we can discuss this issue with equal treatment under the law. Please, feel free to explain exactly how homosexuals are being discriminated against by law.
Report Post »sdarbro
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 2:32pmARCHON:
You ask how gays are making mankind lose its dignity. Later on you admit that it is wrong to imprison someone for opinions about gays. Do you also feel it is wrong for someone to lose their job over these same opinions?
You correctly assert that gays have no affect on the public as they are consenting adults. True, but then someones opinions or thoughts on gays, unless acted upon, will not harm anyone either and should be allowed to exist.
Yet the gay lobby clearly will strike down forcefully anyone with differing opinions i.e. lose job or go to jail. Can you admit that this forceful expression is wrong. Would you say that this harsh reaction uplifts or brings down humanity?
Report Post »PJL
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:03pmThere is manipulation going on in the gay sector.
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:15pmThe left gay sector.
Report Post »JohnofOregon
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:19pmEvery time I go to dc, almost every congressional staff is loaded down with gays. And not the keep my personal sex life quite type, but rather the loud in your your face kind. I love watching the interaction between the young Malcolm x’ers staffers and others putting up with this. Daaaaaa gays run a lot of the show.
Report Post »SoupSandwich
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 3:26pmThe frog got peeved when he heard ‘french’ offered up as a synonym for light in the loafers. It still happens a lot in euro trash land. That dude with the man purse, manicured poodle and eye liner sure looked french. See, it happens. Where is CAIR at on this?
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:55pmGay conservative here wanting to know which blaze readers would round up gays if they could?!?
Report Post »EschatonNow
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:07pmWhat are you trying to conserve? You can’t be gay and conservative. That’s like being a SCOTUS Judge and thinking that the South African Constitution is better than the US Constitution! Think about that and try not to engage in any more sodomy! Love the sinner, Hate the sin !
Report Post »The Third Archon
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:10pmNOT ME–but then I’m a radical syndicalist and an atheist, so…
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:14pm@ESCHATONNOW <<ignorant and a bigot
Report Post »EschatonNow
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:57pmAd Hominem Attack – the refuge of a liberal progressive ! Come out of the closet; you can admit you voted for Obama! No ill will towards you my brother from another mother! Just go an sin no more.
Report Post »shimauma
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:57pmubethechange<— narcissistic and full of himself..and maybe his deviant boyfriend. Gay and homosexual are just code words for sexual deviant. Quit trying to pawn off the guilt you feel for your perversion and get back in the closet if you don't want people to be disgusted by you.
Report Post »finwe
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 12:29am@UBETHECHANGE
Typical reply from a homosexual. Confronted with facts and you resort to name calling. Well done Ubethechange for proving your stereotype.
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 2:25am@ Eschatonnow
Report Post »The term “conservative” is used in a lot of ways. Have you ever heard RP supporters say how “conservative” Ron Paul is? To me, he is a “libertarian” because he doesn’t sign on to two of the three legs to the American “conservative” stool. One of those legs is the “social conservative” aspects of conservatism. Obviously, a homosexual would be less likely to be a “social conservative.” Still, there are a lot of homosexuals who oppose abortion and drug legalization. The first time I voted for president was in 1980. I voted for the Libertarian ticket (Clark and Koch) because I liked their platform (I didn‘t know at the time that Clark was homosexual and I don’t know if it would have changed my vote). Even then, I would call myself a “conservative” on occasion because I was for a strong defense (albeit closer to home) and for pro-growth economic policies (with less entitlement spending). So, I think it is a reach to say “You can’t be gay and conservative.”
Directoratasmallbusiness
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 8:22pmWhoever replied to your post needs to read mine. More power to you gay conservative!!!!! My sister is a gay conservative.
Report Post »jungle J
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:49pmYou don have to be Godly to understand that swallowing feces on a regular basis is not a sanity based sexual manuver.
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:59pmChristian Vanneste is a brave man. There should be more like him in this world, not less. And he’s not saying these truths just to pick a fight, he’s just speaking the truth. Nothing more, nothing less, just truth!
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:01pmFirst they came for the gays, and I did not speak out – because I was not gay.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out-because I was not a jew.
Then they came for the Christians, and I did not speak out-because I was not a Christian.
Then they came for the communists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak out for me.
My take on a Martin Niemoller quote.
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:05pm@THEPATRIOTDAVE Stormfront is calling your name.
Report Post »jamforpresident
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 10:44pmAHAHAHA
I‘m pretty sure homosexuals don’t make a habit of “swallowing” feces. You make it sound like they wait for their partner to ****, throw it in a blender with some milk, pour it in a mug, and drink it down.
I think what you’re hinting at is a “rim job.” And I’ve heard straight couples do that, too.
To each their own. As long as a gay person or another straight person, for that matter, doesn’t push you down and put their tongue near your butt, their sex lives have absolutely nothing to do with you. So, butt out.
Report Post »JohnofOregon
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:48pmWhat the hell, I was replying to the first post here then the site crashed because of gay content, then all the first posts were gone, then it was conservative gay 24 here.
So I gues gays really do run the media.
Anyway some one posted about gays whining again, and I replayed ya, I know i’m tired of listening to Obama whine too.
Report Post »Airgun
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 12:06amYeah….I want the word gay back.
Report Post »The term is “homosexual”.
Aren’t homosexuals who find that word offensive or intimidating “homophobic”?
UBETHECHANGE
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:46pmI am a gay conservative. We do exist. I want to know who here advocates the murdering of gays?
Report Post »Lumbar Spine
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:06pmHow can any self-respecting gay man stand with goobers who believe in their hearts that you are an abomination?
Report Post »dkhartman
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:29pmYou are an idiot lumbar.
I know of 0 (zero) Christians who want to kill anyone because of a sin.
Although I don‘t walk around saying I’m a straight Christian republican idolator or a straight alcoholic christian. I don’t talk loudly about my sins. I admit that I have them though and pray for forgiveness. Christians don’t want to rid the world of any person. They want to rid the world of sin.
The hatred people spread about Christians is just as pathetic as those who hate gays and any other person actually. And lumbar, you’re apart of the spreading of hatred. Shame on you.
Report Post »EschatonNow
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:53pmAbomination to GOD not fellow men! Why to GOD? Because you put your own selfish pleasure before glorifying GOD. How do we glorify GOD ? By acting in conformity with his creation. How do we do that? By the complementarity of the heterosexual union. WTF you say? This guy is crazy you say? What does that mean; complemen…. what? Complementarity means in physics, general systems theory, biology …..the unitariness of opposite manifestations of a phenomenon. (see Niel Bohrs). The fact is that despite mankind’s desires and will to use birth control, abortion, and placing the pleasure of sex above the purpose of sex; GOD wants you to create more little yous to worship and love him (or her or it). Ergo, if you can’t get this stuff right (ie, create a loving mutual complementarity with the opposite sex in mutual worship of GOD) than stay celibate and worship GOD full time. Really, a man sodomizing his male neighbor, his female neighbor, his wife, his sister, his mother, his father, his neighbor’s 12 year old, his neighbor’s sheep, etc. is glorifying GOD? or brings dignity to humankind? Really, explain how?
Report Post »Airgun
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 12:10amDo you have a problem with the word “homosexual”?
Report Post »Would you like to see all accurate words rounded up and ostracised?
Isn’t the word “gay” as applied to homosexuals a misnomer?
UBETHECHANGE
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:35pmSo which commenters on the blaze support the murder of gays? Here come bigots and the far right in 1, 2, 3, 4…
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:44pmI do not support the murder of ANYONE. But I would bet a MILLION DOLLARS you support the murder of babies in the womb…Am I right bonehead??
Could I slap the stupid off of you? Answer…No…I dont have enough time.
Report Post »brother_ed
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:44pmI’m not sure he advocated the murder of homosexuals…
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:53pm@BADDOGGY I am a gay conservative and believe a man+woman=marriage and is a covenant with God. I do not believe in abortion. I am a Catholic now! I stand with Glenn! I stand with Israel!
Report Post »teamarcheson
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:53pmThere is much truth in that statement this man and his family will have to be destroyed. Truth like this could spread like wild fire.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:01pmGood for you. How do you feel about abortion in regards to rape and incest? You stand with Glenn on that too? Glenn thinks its OK to MURDER a baby in the womb if there is rape or incest. Therefore he is NOT pro-life…He stands for MURDER.
By the way James Roberon, the preacher who spoke with Josh Hamilton tonight on GBTV was a product of a rape…Not aborted of course.
My brother is gay. I love him. I would defend his right to do whatever he wants to do in life until he crosses the line and hurts another human being. His sin of homosexuality will be dealt with in the presence of God when he dies. I know its sin, but I also know i have no right to tell him how to live his life until he hurts someone else…Like murdering someone else.
Freedom and Liberty always rule, but they also come with responsibility.
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:14pm@BADDOGGY Abortion is murder. Period. Glenn does not support abortion. Period. I don‘t go around saying hey everyone I’m gay, but I need to get my point across. I cannot stand militant fascist people in any of the religious or political spectrums.
Report Post »toto
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:49pmI don‘t think there are many conservatives that wouldn’t welcome you as friend, neighbor, co-worker etc. It’s the stance you mention of the immoral, in your face militarism, that is so totally offensive, and to my mind unacceptable. I don’t like immoral straights any better. Both do great damage to themselves, their families and society at large.
Report Post »wzanesdad
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 12:22amubethechange:
Report Post »I agree with toto. You sound like someone that most conservatives would not have any argument with. The problem is that gay rights groups take such extreme liberal stands on everything that it seems as if there is never any common ground. As an individual you should be commended for your view on abortion, but, that is only one gay person. Why won’t the gay rights groups take a stand against abortion? challenge planned parenthood? or stand against corruption in government?, or maybe stand with conservatives about rights coming from God, not the government? I think you‘d find a lot more people supporting your cause if you’d be more supportive of conservative causes. When I say you…I don’t mean you personally, I mean the gay community as a whole.
troopsupporter
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 12:59amThanks U for being the change! Its not about who you share your bed with that matters, its about having respect for yourself and others and not thinking one group or idea is more important than another. The majority of conservatives I know are hard working, care about providing for our families and saving for our future. Everything else is trivial.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 6:06amYou are wrong about Glenn…He does very much say that you can abort a child in the case of rape or murder. So does Pat Gray. Sorry, you cant have it both ways. Murder is murder and Glen is pro murder of an unborn child in the case of rape and incest. Therefore he is not pro life…
As far as you being gay, who gives a crap. The problem with the gay community is like what is wrong with my brother, he wants to lisp, walk like a girl and flaunt his gayness. Please stop that crap. It is an insult to heterosexuals as far as i am concerned. Many gays do not even realize they do it because they have been so militant for so long…I dont care if you arer gay. I just dont want you strutting like a peacock to prove it to others…
Report Post »wntsmallgov
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 6:28amUBETHECHANGE
Report Post »Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:35pm
So which commenters on the blaze support the murder of gays? Here come bigots and the far right in 1, 2, 3, 4…
_____________________________________
Just by that statement you fall in line with the left. Murder of anyone is a Sin. Self defense of yourself or others is not a sin. I have homosexuals in my family with long term relationships. I am not against them what I am against is a government mandate that states I must accept marriage as a governmental standard. To use a liberal/progressive term. Seperation of church and state. Marrige belongs in a Church, Civil Unions are for the state. That includes my lic for civil union with my wife. My pastor married us in the eyes of God. IF a church is willing to bless the union with the sacrament of Marriage then great. But do not force the word to change based on your beliefs. The Constitution does not bar not give the right of marriage to anyone.
I do pray for all people find happiness but that happiness can not come at a loss of personal Honor.
Quiata
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 6:42pm@UBE Okay, that’s enough of that question already. That kind of baiting is right in line with “how many of you have quit beating your wife…please step up and explain” nonsense. It sounds like you’re spoiling for a fight, being so insistent.
Report Post »I, for one, think that it‘s plausible that you’re “conservative” in some respects (if you agree with political pigeonholes). But please stop it with the in-your-face bullying, challenging people into some kind of tete-a-tete with you.
cemerius
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:33pmYeah and 100′s of other “social groups” intertwined to bring a downfall to what is RIGHT and GOOD!!! If you want to be gay, go ahead its your choice but DON”T shove your gayness down our throats!!!! These “social groups” comprise a small minority of populations YET they have very real power!!!
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:36pmShove what down whos throats?…hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Report Post »Boycott the Media Let the People Decide
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:25pmGays are just another form of A.D.D. which was created in the 90′s. If’s physically impossible for them to reproduce therefore physically impossible to be a genetic disorder. But Unlike the 90′s where we treated disorders now we give them a reality show and promote their disorder…..Keep up the good work Lawmaker!
Report Post »teamarcheson
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:37pmIn ancient times they were called eunuchs.
Report Post »Windwalker
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:32pmIn ancient times or any other time, eunuchs are men who are castrated.
Report Post »Lumbar Spine
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:19pmI think divorced people are causing mankind to lose its dignity. No respect for the sanctity of marriage any more. The majority of marriages end in divorce. I wonder what the percentage is in Hollywood and in the media.
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:26pmActually it’s you leftists who are destroying man kind.
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:30pmIt’s you lefties who are causing all of these problems.
Report Post »Lumbar Spine
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:37pmNo, actually, I think it’s divorced people. The message they are sending our children is that it’s okay to trade in your spouse when you find one you like better. Ask Newt Gingrich, for example.
Report Post »Virginia Rebel
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:47pmYou make it sound so simple, Lumbar, like people just decide they don’t want to be married any more for no apparent reason. Throwing divorce out there is the most typical red herring used by gays to take negative attention away from the condition of being gay. Divorce isn’t THE issue. The reasons that people divorce are the real issues – infidelity, immaturity, wanting to be “free to find themselves” (whatever that means), abuse, irresponsible behavior, pornography, drug addiction, alcoholism, a spouse committing crimes, or some guy deciding he‘s gay or some woman deciding she’s a lesbian. To throw out divorce in a discussion about gays is just a diversion tactic, and I, for one, refuse to let gays divert me that way.
Report Post »Lumbar Spine
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:13pmVIRGINIA…I’m just suggesting you look at your own selective prejudices a little closer. Because for each argument you have against gays I can find one equally compelling against other assorted “fornicators”.
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:52pmLumbar spine – Look at your own prejudices first, hypocrite. Then lecture the rest of us about tolerance and diversity.
Report Post »wntsmallgov
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 6:32amlumbar- what is allowed, by your standard, for a couple to get divorced?
Abuse?
Unfaithfulness?
Drug use?
To love is a verb and we as a nation need to do that but I will not put up with the two above in any relationship.
Report Post »sdarbro
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 2:44pmI can agree with that. the Hollywood marriages, the 50% divorce rate. yeah that definitely does not help humanity. well said.
However, I also think the same about gays. Gays sound ok until you really break down their mechanics of intimacy. too often that is glossed over. I have tried some of those acts (with female). believe me it is no joke. It is as filthy as you can imagine. Nothing like what you might see on the Internet.
I respect that emotions might drive attractions to one gender or the other, and i can concede that this attraction is biological. However, there is nothing biological about having to wipe _______ off your _______ after it has been up someone’s _________. that is a kinky lifestyle preference and not a hereditary trait.
Report Post »EschatonNow
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:17pmWhat part of his comments were false?? Where is there dignity when one man sodomizes another? Yet I am suppose to be disgusted when a brother and sister have carnal relations?? Double standard would you not say? For the record both are an abomination against nature and nature’s God. Both “life styles” lower mankind’s dignity! The Islamists will straighten out France (no pun intended)!
Report Post »Lumbar Spine
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:25pmThen I think you should also get rid of heterosexual couples who engage in anal sex…and those who have threesomes. Right…?
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:27pmLumbar spine – People who engage in threesomes are not heterosexual, moron.
Excuse me if people should be allowed to pick and choose who to be tolerant of.
Report Post »Lumbar Spine
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:35pmGIT-R-DONE…threesomes can most certainly be heterosexual, moron.
And, yes, my point was that some folks here apparently would like to be selective about which sexual activity to ban.
Personally, I think consenting adults of any flavor should do whatever the hell they damn well want in the privacy of their homes.
Report Post »EschatonNow
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:57pmLumbar Spine, so an 18 yr old sister and an 20 yr old brother should be able to do whatever they want in the privacy of their bedroom? How about a 45 yr old man and his 23 yr old daughter? They might “love each other”; they might “remain committed and caring to each other”. So three adults females should be able to adopt a child; I mean why stick to only two parents? How about three 30 yr old hetero guys and a slutty 22 yr old girl? Why can’t they get married and have a child with all 4 names on the birth certificate? Because more than 50% of marriages end in divorce does not mean that marriage is the problem; just the selfish, narcisstic, nihilist people. Hey let’s kill children in the womb, they might ruin our adult orgies (we all consent ). Hey grandma is a pain in the rear; let’s turn her into solent green. Hey those retards are not going to have a good life lets put them out of their misery. No? Did I take it too far? You’re just advocating for innocent sex in the privacy of your home right? You need to understand what sex is for; not your selfish pleasures, but to glorify GOD; yes wrap your mind around that!
Report Post »Lumbar Spine
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:10pmESCHAT…you lost me at incest, which I most certainly do not condone. But I think you know I meant consenting adults not related by blood. And, ummmm…exactly how does wild, uninhibted sex glorify God? Or should sex be conducted quietly? Please explain.
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 2:36amLumbar Spine – If you don’t want people to criticize your sex habits, then don‘t talk about them in front of people who don’t want to hear it.
Report Post »sdarbro
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 2:49pmLUMBAR:
what? do you think that I would condone a threesome and not think that it also brings down humanity? Of course it does. How could a threesome be healthy to any culture?
yeah make jokes about me being a prude, but I know first-hand that threesomes are NOT the funny-fun fun time that pop culture makes it out to be. It is bizarre and kinda awkward and usually one person is just kinda hanging around waiting. Later comes the regrets broken relationships.
Report Post »Quiata
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 6:47pmCheck the demographics in France. Give them about two decades before the moral vacuum is filled, literally, by the growing Islamic population. Stuff will change there.
Report Post »semihardrock
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:16pmWOW! a French man will balls….taking on the homosexuals!
Its a tickle fight!
Report Post »randy
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:15pmNazi Germany declared homosexuality an aberration.
Report Post »You got that right!
A disgusting vile lifestyle!
Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:17pmAre you anti-gay or pro-nazi?
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:21pmYou‘d feel more at home over on stormfront’s website. I find your comment vile and psychotic.
Report Post »Smokey_Bojangles
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:24pmAnd So Many NAZIS were gay. Jewish George Soros used to turn in Jews. Some folks just have a self Hate complex.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:14pmGood for him…although I could give a flying fish fart about France…
If we keep inflaming the gays with DOMA and stupid laws like that we will have the same problem. Who cares what someone does in their own bedroom? If someone does not understand human plumbing,,,so what? Let them suffer whatever God dishes out for them..
Get the government out of anything to do with mariage. No licenses, no say at all, no JP weddings NOTHING. Then the gay movement dies…They cannnot breed, they can only grow in numbers if they have a cause to fight against. they use DOMA to recruit new members and unite…So stop with the stupid defining of marrigae..We know what it really is, the Government has no business defining anything!
Report Post »toto
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:55pmTrying to redefine marriage into man-man or woman-woman instead of man-woman is a little like saying cats will now hence forth be referred to as dogs because they want to be dogs and we must all be fair.
Report Post »jamforpresident
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 11:11pm@Toto
It would be a little like saying that if cats had the ability to talk. And to have complex thoughts. And if girl cats wanted to date other girl cats. Your analogy would work if some humans were like, “Nah, I don‘t think I’m really a human. I’m a pig.” Which, actually, I would call you.
Also, your comment implies that homosexuality is this new, hip trend and everyone’s just jumping on the bandwagon to gay city. Homosexuality dates way back, at least back to the Ancient Greeks and probably earlier than that, and I don’t necessarily think it was ever ordained as “wrong” until the Christians decided it was so.
Actually, my real point is, why does anyone care if two gay people get married? It doesn‘t affect the sanctity of anyone else’s marriage whatsoever. And I’m pretty sure God has bigger fish to fry right now – world hunger, homelessness, the economic crisis, arranging the Cosmos, etc. I‘m pretty sure He’d be happy if two people who loved each other made a sacred vow to love each other forever.
Report Post »georgiavietvet
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:11pmthe french lawmaker is exactly right. the gays and their supporters seem to think that they have the right to push their lifestyleoff onto the rest of us. i for one will never accept their UNGODLY ways or accept their lifestyle. homosexuality is of the devil……………………………….
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:29pmI’m a gay conservative and liberal gays annoy the hell out of me with their militant stances, just as much as the fascist right, the fascist left, the atheists, the communists, the socialists, the marxists etc
Marriage is between a man and a woman and is a covenant with God. I stand with my conservative brothers and sisters on that one.
Report Post »Virginia Rebel
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:10pmGays DO manipulate the media.
Report Post »Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:17pmWell, they are expecting us just to bend over and take it.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:21pmAmen to both comments!
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:28pmThey want to force society to accept these freaks as normal and jail anybody who says anything bad about them.
Report Post »Lumbar Spine
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 11:29pmReally, Virginia…how so? Give us all a few examples of how gays manipulate the media.
BTW, when Ken Mehlman was Chairman of the Republican National Committee a few years ago did he manipulate the media?
Report Post »finwe
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 12:35am@Lumbar Spine
How about GLAAD protesting every TV Station and television show for not having a gay character?
Report Post »Walkabout
Posted on February 16, 2012 at 6:09pmGit-R-Done
They want to force society to accept these freaks as normal and jail anybody who says anything bad about them.
_______________________________________
Exactly
Try to silence critics like pastors in Canada & Sweden with Hate Speech Laws.
You don’t think that journalist take notes about those consequences & decide never to cross the gay lobby?
Yes they do change the media.
We need to separate ourselves from gays.
Report Post »Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on February 15, 2012 at 10:04pmWhy can’t we all just be the the rapist, Pepe Le Pew.
Report Post »