Furious Nancy Grace Cuts Off Mic of Joran Van Der Sloot’s Friend During On-Air Interview
- Posted on January 11, 2012 at 9:31pm by
Tiffany Gabbay
- Print »
- Email »
HLN’s Nancy Grace is no stranger to heated exchanges, nor is she shy about telling both viewers and guests what she really thinks. Wednesday evening’s HLN broadcast was no exception, as Grace abruptly cut off the mic of guest Joran van der Sloot’s friend, John Ludwick, after he blamed Sloot’s victim for her grisly murder.
“You are saying that the murder victim who endured a brutal beating a super human strangulation where her neck bone was crushed, the room covered in blood, her clothes ripped off of her post mortem and left that way to be found, it’s her fault?!” Grace blasted.
“Sir, you know what, cut his mic, John Ludwick, I reserve this for very very few people, but you sir, are a fool. And what you have said sets victims rights back, hmmm, maybe a couple hundred years, take him off the screen, I don’t wanna look at him anymore!”
Mediaite adds:
Ludwick had earlier defended van der Sloot, saying he didn’t deserve the death penalty and that it was a crime of passion.
“She put herself in the situation Nancy!” Ludwick argued. “As soon as she found out who he was, she should have left, she shouldn’t have started an argument and fighting with him, and being in an isolated area…If I was a woman and I was in her situation I surely wouldn’t have stood around to ask him that question, I would have got out of there.”
Watch Grace’s heated exchange below courtesy of HLN via Mediaite:





















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (223)
Techster64
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:58pmAny time someone murders another person, it is not that person’s fault. Focus people.
Report Post »Ruler4You
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 5:40amYou got that right.
I hope Joran makes some inmate a very good wife.
Report Post »Bluefish49
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 7:57amOh you can bet the victims family has already made some arrangements.
Report Post »charleyrocks
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 7:58amThey are all being paid by the father no doubt seeing him laugh alongside the guards makes sense if there is new money in their pockets. That is why he only got 10 years there can be no other common sense reason.
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 8:01amNancy Grace is an idiot. Here brand of news is for the mental midget that can only listen ,and had no ability to think on their own. Nancy takes a truth that is sensational, then adds her own guess work and lies, making it appear to be fact. I would rather watch paint dry than listen to her big mouth.
Report Post »MR_ANDERSON
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 8:02amEveryone’s a victim, and nobody is at fault. (Unless you are rich.)
Isn’t that what the left has been teaching for years?
Report Post »Dustoff
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 9:28amGives you an idea why type of friends he hangs with.
I wonder how much more these friends really know about these murders?
Report Post »GeorgieJo
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 9:52amJoran a rich dutch kid who always had his dad to get him out of trouble
Report Post »Nancy Grace did the right thing. Victim of a murder now no longer has any rights?
My sympathy for the family. Losing a 21 year old daughter—I can’t even IMAGINE.
AvengerK
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 11:03amLiberalism 101: It‘s always someone else’s fault.
Report Post »angelcat
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 1:04pmCharleyrocks, if you are referring to Vad der Sloot’s father, he is dead. He died several years ago.
Report Post »blamelessace5
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 1:21pmfrom a criminal justice stand point …he actually doesnt sound that crazy he obviously leans in his friends favor …however that case can be made saying because of his ptsd that if she had done anything that could have put him into an enragement therefore it would have been the smarter thing to just leave ..i wouldnt have waited around for the same thing to happen to me …but jan or whatever her name is ..is honestly freaking out more than this guy is idk if its just for the views or what.
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 3:05pmOf course she did Nancy doesn‘t invite gurst on for counter arguments if you say anything she doesn’t agree with it shoots sand right up her ******.
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 3:06pmAnd how this biotch got the last name Grace is beyond be because she has none….Grace that is
Report Post »Yeah_Buddy
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 4:28pmNancy is 100% right to be outraged by this guys comments. I hope an inmate does verdersloth in shortly. If you don’t agree, think about if it was your daughter this happened to..then repost.
Report Post »Godfather.1
Posted on January 13, 2012 at 5:26am@rangerp
Your description of Nancy Grace fits Glenn Beck perfectly.
Report Post »UPSETVET
Posted on January 13, 2012 at 1:52pmJoran Van Der Sloot was given 28 years with the possibility of parole after 14 years. I doubt that he’ll last one year in a Peruvian prison. He’s an arrogant “gringo” who murdered a Peruvian woman and the Peruvian prisoners will probably kill him in a vengence killing. He‘s a very egocentric individual as well and the other prisoners won’t like that. His days are numbered for sure. Good
Report Post »phillipwgirard
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:46pmPersonally, Nancy GRACE SEEMS LIKE A MANHATER TO ME, SHE ALSO SEEMS TO LIKE, OR SHALL I say love the sound of her own voice. As for Van Der Sloot, if the family paid me, he would have been gone before he killed his second victim,,,
Report Post »HoggKilla
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:02pmI’d took him for a one way trip in the Everglades. Let the gator take care of what the Aruba Gov. couldn’t.
Report Post »Cat
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 6:57amHoggkilla >
Too cold right now, gators can’t see or smell much, try mid-August / September
Report Post »A hot, balmy day when the smell of rotting moss, dead cypress and gator crap wafts in the air …
That’ll be justice
Sloburn
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 8:11amCAT>>
Yea, but if he was tied to a I beam and left they would find him —- eventually.
Report Post »Doctor Nordo
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:41pmWhile the friend was certainly wrong in wishing for Van Der Sloot to be released in 10 years, and he certainly didn’t present his opinion very clearly, he does have a point.
The victim could have prevented what happened. That isn’t the same thing as it being her fault. A beautiful woman wandering through the slums at night without any protection while wearing a mini skirt is not at fault if she gets raped, but judgement and common sense could be used to prevent the situation from ever happening. Or as another example, a guy crossing the parking lot without looking both ways and who then gets hit by a car is certainly not at fault, but he could have prevented what happened by taking a moment to see if the coast is clear. Same kind of logic.
The last thing that this person should have done after finding out about this dude was to confront him about it, even in the most innocuous of ways. She should have slipped out and called the police.
Report Post »Jayms
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:52pmSo, what you‘re saying is that she ’deserved’ what she got? Is that it?
Report Post »Fearnone
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:52pmDo you also believe that girls who wear shorts deserve to be attacked? Great logic there, bud.
Report Post »SoCaLCapitalist
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:00pmShe had nothing to fear if he wasn‘t a killer as he’d claimed. Pretty soon Joran will be transferred to a regular prison and put in general population. I suspect his actions on killing 2 women will lead to his death in prison.
Flores dad might do what some guy in the US did. He simply said I don’t think my daughter received justice in the court. When a lifer inmate killed the guy in jail he put money in the guys prison account. I heard it on the radio a few years back. I don’t know about the legality in the US or Peru.
Report Post »Doctor Nordo
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:00pmDid you idiots even read what I wrote? Of course they don’t deserve it. I am simply able to draw the distinction between fault and ability to prevent.
Report Post »Doctor Nordo
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:03pmIf a guy is holding up a bank, would someone who is interested in self-preservation show more wisdom in not drawing attention to himself or in going up and tapping the guy on the shoulder? Either way if he gets gunned down it is the bank robber’s fault. However, decisions made on the part of the victim do affect the likelihood of something bad happening to them. Can you dispute that?
Report Post »KusoJiJi
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:05pmwas this guy defending his buddy or was he sending a dire warning to women everywhere of the need to be more careful with who they hook up with? we will never really know, nancy grace failed as a professional journalist.
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 1:33amI can see the point here. No, the victim was in no way at fault. I think the “provoked” word is being miscontrued. It doesn’t mean, in this case, she provoked him in a bad way, I think it just means that merely by bringing to light that he was involved in Natalie’s death, it set him off. It was an incidental provoking, not a provoking in the manner which we normally understand the word to be used.
Report Post »The poor girl maybe could have spared her own life if she kept quiet and left.
pazzo242
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 5:08amDr. Nordo–you are an idiot
Report Post »BSdetector
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 7:16amI understand what Nordo’s saying.
If I take a stroll through Camden, NJ at Midnight and I get shot, which is HIGHLY likely in that scenario, getting shot would in no way be my fault but a little more wisdom in choosing my actions could very easily end with me living to see another day.
Likewise if you are in an isolated area and alone with an accused murderer(bad judgement) and you think it might be true, you don’t get into an argument, provoke him, and assume he WONT murder you.
Report Post »The guy should fry for what he did, but a little more wisdom on her part could have resulted in her being alive today.
aspkisser
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 7:42amDoofus!
Report Post »bigdaddyt46
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 8:01amdoc you‘re right in you’re assement of this. and to jayms he didn’t say she deserved it, what he is saying bottom line is use common sense and always be aware of your surrondings.
Report Post »redfish83
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 8:49amDr. Nordo is simply thinking with higher logic…..something the average Blaze reader lacks….he never said anything about her deserving it….most of the comments on here are a real indictment of the American education system
Report Post »troymac20
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 9:30amDr Nordo may not be blaming the victom but is certainly assuming to much. He has no idea what really happen in that room and no possible way to know that this woman had a chance to walk away from someone who is obviously a sick and cold blooded killer.
Report Post »Dustoff
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 9:32amFirst of all fool! We have NO-idea what really happened. It’s all his story. Or did you miss that part.
Report Post »The girl is dead, she can’t tell us what really happened.
One thing is for sure, your not a doctor of common sense.
chiquita
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 9:43amYou are taking the word of a self professed habital liar of how the events transpired in that room. He is the only one that knows the truth. She may have never had the opportunity to slip away and prevent what happened to her. While I do understand what you are trying to express, I can’t agree with your assessment of this particular situation because no one but Joran knows the truth of what really happened.
Report Post »mike_trivisonno
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 10:20amLudwick expresses a tacit acceptance Sharia law and is not even conscious of the act. That is just how deeply he and millions of others in Europe have been deceived.
…“She put herself in the situation Nancy!” Ludwick argued….
In sharia law, “she” is considered “uncovered meat” tempting innocent men to commit crimes. She, in Ludwick’s glassy eyes, in the eyes of Sharia, and the eyes of Allah, she should be stoned to death for her “crime” of being a female in “the wrong place” and “at the wrong time”.
Report Post »mike_trivisonno
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 10:22am“Doctor” Nordo is most likely a muslim.
Report Post »caveman74
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 10:58amThe doctor is not saying she had it coming to her. What he is saying is she was in a situation that she did not have to be in. There are guys like this in every city in the world. We live in a time where a one night stand can and does end in a trip to the morgue for men and women. It is our duty as parents to teach our children this. “I’ll call you in the morning“ is much safer than ”I will come up to your room”. She did not deserve what happened to her and as a father of two daughters I can’t imagine what the family is going through. All the doctor is saying is one little decision could have saved her life. I pray ven der sloot hangs high for his crimes and I pray that gives resolution to the families of his victims. Don’t let these tragedies go to waist. Laddies out there don’t do one night stands! Is a little instant gratification worth your lives? Learn from the mistakes these young women made so that you can have long lives.
Report Post »rosegrower
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 11:19amI can appreciate the idea that the girl could have saved herself by getting out of the room once she knew who she was with (great example for anyone trying to preach abstinence to their teens, BTW), but then to say that Joran should only get 10 years because the girl caused the problem is a place I can’t go. Joran is a serial killer – he got away with Natalie Holloway’s murder, for now – and keeping this piece of garbage locked up for as long as you can will protect the rest of society, regardless of whether they use good judgment or not. Foolishness should not be a death sentence.
Report Post »caveman74
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:04pmagreed rosegrower but murder should be a death sentance. I did not used to quote scripture but as I get older it makes more sense. We should teach our children from a young age so they do not find themselves in dangerous situations:
Report Post »Proverbs 22:6
Start children off on the way they should go,
and even when they are old they will not turn from it.
and when we find monsters like van der sloot justice should be swift:
genesis 9:6
Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in his own image.
johnpaulkuchtajr
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:23pmHey, Doc, I’ll bet you attended an upscale private university and graduate school?
Report Post »Doctor Nordo
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 1:26pm@ROSEGROWER
“but then to say that Joran should only get 10 years because the girl caused the problem is a place I can’t go. ”
And I agree with you 1,000%. If convicted, this guy should get life without parole. Personally, I am opposed to capital punishment.
Report Post »Rpfoster
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 1:35pmI don’t care want the victim is wearing. One should only defend oneself or come to the aid of a victim. By being an attacker of someone, rather it is a slap in the face or a brutal murder, the person commiting the violent act is guilty and should be punished accordingly.
Report Post »chiquita
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 3:15pmWhile I appreciate your views & logic, still can’t agree with you completely. Quote: “Of course we don’t know precisely what happened that night. I can only base my views on the information that has been provided. And all of that information has claimed that the victim confronted VDS over being an alleged murderer.” All of the information provided, as you refer to, comes solely from VDS’s mouth. The truth could be so totally different, such as she spurned his advances. Sure, she went to his room with him, maybe expecting a romantic encounter, but something turned it to something she didn’t want (& it probably didn’t have anything to do with his computer or Natalie Holloway), and he wouldn’t take no for an answer and became enraged. His arrogance is well established. I would venture to say that a similar scenario happened with Natalie Holloway, but we’ll never know what happened to her….or even where her body is. Point is….we’ll NEVER know the truth about the deaths of either young woman and this monster needs to NEVER be released back on society in any country.
Report Post »Doctor Nordo
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 6:40pm@Chiquita
If you had fully read what I have been saying, you would have seen that I have been agreeing with you all along. One of my previous statements:
“However, if this girl did indeed confront VDS, then she should have known that there was a possibility for violence and should have adjusted her actions accordingly.”
Notice the crucial qualifying word “if”. And Nancy and this friend were arguing based on the foregone assumption that the victim did confront VDS. So it seems that you really don’t disagree with me, but you’re trying to play it off like you do.
Report Post »m1ss1ss1pp1
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 7:59pmYou have a point Doctor Nordo. Sometime‘s I wonder if saying that someone didn’t deserve something if that is just a way of not holding someone accountable for their actions. Some people don‘t deserve what happen’s to them than you have some people who do everything they can to attract trouble to themselve’s
Report Post »v15
Posted on January 13, 2012 at 3:08amNordo, I understand the point you are trying to make and your logic is sound. We all agree that no one deserves to be killed but people should exercise judgement and common sense at all times. I have never heard of Nancy Grace before but obviously took this personally because she said she has been a victim of physical assault. My immediate impression of Nancy Grace is that she is a narcissist that likes to tear other people down. I know nothing about this case but I am sure she already had her mind made up to berate this guy – and he really couldn’t get his point across. Anyways, there’s never an excuse for murder.
Report Post »trlooksbeyond
Posted on January 15, 2012 at 5:42pmA woman was murdered in cold blood. The friend of Van der Sloot does not have a valid point. He sympathizes with his friend based on said friends account of what happened. What evidence do we have that the woman provoked Van Der Sloot other than the murderer’s word?! Dr. Nordo, you’re going out on a limb by assuming that this woman made bad choices that lead to her untimely brutal death! May you or your loved ones never be in the wrong place at the wrong time! Imagine some “Doctor” pointing out the victims errors, based purely on speculation and the accounts of a deranged murderer! My prayers are for the family of the victims of Van der Sloot for peace and forgiveness.
Report Post »heyjim55
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:38pmDeath is the only suitable punishment for this guy I say feed him to some starving lions or Aligators or cut him a little and then feed him to some tiger sharks I would suggest a great white but Tigers tend to finish their meal.
Report Post »phillipwgirard
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:54pmThis guy is a psycho, he should be gone,,,
Report Post »donaldchar
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:38pmPlease, folks, pay attention – he’s NOT “blaming the victim” for what the criminal did. He clearly asserts that this could have been averted if she had been wiser, if she had departed when the door was open.
Report Post »AB5r
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:46pmApparently she dug into his e-mail and found something about the other murder case or something like that. Well, duh. At that point you run, jump out a window, say you have to go in a calm voice and walk backwards out of the room. Young women are being raised to “believe” they are equal, they don’t need to be afraid, they can do whatever they want, etc. There are often stories of white women being killed by black men they were dating. Whatever the statistics, whatever common sense should tell them, it has all been carefully and meticulously brainwashed out of the modern liberal mind. That girl thought Van der Sloot would just chat her up like one of her professors.
Report Post »txjb
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:36pmI cannot believe a good percentage of you are downing Nancy , making jokes about her . Did you all not hear the low life say , it was the vics fault ? But yet your anger is towards Nancy ! Get off the drugs !!!
Report Post »Never Offended
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:43pmDude, it’s not about taking sides here. I’m not agreeing with the low life, I just think that Nancy Grace is a very unpleasant person. Which is why I find this video so hilarious, it’s an argument between a d**khead & a C**T.
Report Post »Fearnone
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:48pm@NEVER OFFENDED
You are a disgraceful POS.
Report Post »Fearnone
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:50pm@Neveroff
Do you also laugh at angry black women?
Report Post »Never Offended
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:55pm@ FearNone
Thank you sir, & you are a ray of sunshine.
Report Post »Never Offended
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:01pm“Do you also laugh at angry black women?”
Well I don’t know why that would matter to you or what that has to do with anything but yes I would laugh. Depending on the context I would laugh at any angry woman whether they were black, white, or orange.
Report Post »Fearnone
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:21pm@Neveroff
You are an offensive person, which is obvious by your choice of your picture and that you laugh at people. It takes one to know one, since I too am an offensive person, but the substance and degree is where we differ.
Report Post »Never Offended
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:36pm“but the substance and degree is where we differ”
Definitely, where some people might fine me offensive, others might find me funny (probably not many on this website).
I’m just trying to bring a fresh point of view to this website. I hate how it’s always so doom & gloom around here all the time. People need to lighten up sometimes you know? Life‘s not fun if you’re always pissed off, like the Nancy Grace’s of the world.
Report Post »Fearnone
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:43pm@Neveroff
Well said, and even I can’t argue with that.
Report Post »The American People
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 6:46amFirst of all, imagine my suprise to find a character with a Guy Fawkes mask, a symbol of modern day Occupy Wallstreet trash, defending a victim!!! lol thats rich. Occupy Wallstreet, responsible for more innocent raped women than Van Der Sloot Ever was. It doesn’t matter what kind of person she was at all. She didnt deserve his excessive maniacle, childish tantrum induced beating or murder. Van Der Sloot does deserve the death penalty and he deserves it with baseball bats, just as important though, his little buddy, needs to be forced, not asked, FORCED to watch every second of it. Maybe he’ll come away with a new understanding of things.
Report Post »The American People
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 6:55amThat doesn’t even cover the fact that while some people are trying to rationalize this crap, which is sick, and other people are trying to put their two cents in, its still the type of act that only the worst kind of filthy coward would do anyway. Its the same mentally sick type of human cancer that would physically attack anything that was smaller, more innocent or weaker than themselves. The type of coward who would have had his seat on the lifeboats while they were still trying to load WOMEN and CHILDREN as the Titanic sunk! So to sum up, disgusting, delinquent, perverted, coward of the worst order.
Report Post »Ravings of a lunatic planet
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 2:51pmI agree with you TXJB………….what’s up with you people here. Who gives a rat’s rear end what Nancy has to say. This pos is defending Joran. Maybe they should go investigate this idiot as well. Birds of a feather flock together. Man, so the woman should not have been there, blah blah blah……..so she should be murdered for it……….get a life people.
Report Post »Netsurfer2
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:31pmWhy doesn’t someone in the prison just take him out, like what happened to Jefferey Daumar! All these murderers get what coming to them! They are the lowest of life and deserve even worse than what they did to their victims! None of those victims deserved to die that way! He doesn’t deserve to live in this world regardless! Get rid of the sickness for good!
Report Post »Never Offended
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:26pm“Life is a tragedy to those who feel, and a comedy to those who think.”
I was chuckling throughout this video. Not because I agree with the guy but because I believe Nancy Grace is probably the biggest C**T on TV & I get a kick out her frustration. I love it when uptight people like her or Bill O’Reilly get all offended and throw a b**ch fit.
Report Post »llotus
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:40pmnever offended……….you may never be offended but your language is very offensive. axxhole. Lotus.
Report Post »FreeUsAll
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:45pmYou might want to temper yourself, as the swear-words denote poor taste. I cannot believe, as an agnostic, that I am reprimanding a person with their icon as a picture of Jesus, but I guess it is now possible. Never Offended, you have the wrong name, according to your rants.
Report Post »Never Offended
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:08pm@ FreeUsAll It may be poor taste, but at this moment it‘s not like I’m trying to impress anybody here. Of course if I am some place where good manners are important then I don’t use profanity. But this is the internet, I don’t care.
& I am agnostic as well. My Jesus pic is just part of my ironic sense of humor. He’s laughing & winking & I find it funny. Especially since some Christians would get offended at such a simple picture. Plus, it kinda symbolizes to me how religion has people hoodwinked. In my opinion of course.
Report Post »Fearnone
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:00am“Truth is a tragedy to those who lie, and a mystery to those who refute.”
Report Post »The American People
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 7:04amTo hell with no no words and all the rest, “NEVER OFFENDED” SOMETIMES it is funny to watch a Democrat or liberal get offended and uptight, your right about that. NOT in this case however. She has every right to be offended, if your mother, wife, or sister, god forbid, was put in harms way, or raped and you knew another person who had the same thing happen to his mother, wife or sister, you wouldn‘t think that some guy making light of it or agreeing with the rapist was cool and you sure as hell wouldn’t laugh at the other victim for being upset over it.
Report Post »Biddle
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 10:36amBrother, I applaud the fact that your are an agnostic….by the way Christ is portrayed by many of us calling ourselves Christians on this site, its is very likely we bring shame to Him and turn MORE people away from him than we bring to Him. Blessings to you.
Report Post »trlooksbeyond
Posted on January 15, 2012 at 5:58pmI enjoy laughter and comedy as much as the next guy and while I agree that Nancy is irritating to watch, my interest in this story was born out of a desire to see justice in a tragic case of murder by a man who apparrently has no moral conscience and believes he is entitled even to kill another human being who “offends” him. It saddens me that your heart is so hardened that you are “never offended”.
Report Post »The senseless murder of another human being should always be offensive to everyone.
Detroit paperboy
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:23pmNancy Grace is a man Baby……………
Report Post »The American People
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 7:09amahhhhhh Detroit, take a deep breath and smell the culture rot, the illiteracy, the crime. I’m sure you make a valid point by attacking a news anchor who is offended by people who defend murder but I just had to dip in and point out the irony, aside from your support of crime, in anyone from Detroit, where half of the city is illiterate, calling themselves a paperboy, lol.
Report Post »The American People
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 7:13amand Detroit is mostly illiterate, they don’t need a paperboy. Who would read it? Why would they want to? “Breaking News! 112 new murders in the past 6 minutes! City Corruption, 17 dollar houses and more people moved out!” lol
Report Post »BonnieBlueFlag
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:21pmShe should have referred to this putz as “Squeaky” as in Fromme. What a pathetic little boot licker. Better to reign in hell? We will see about that, fella. It’s a one-way ticket.
Report Post »Secret Squirrel
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:12pm.
Report Post »Ever notice how Nancy Grace always looks like she just smelled something bad?
shamanal
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:17pmnancy the freak IS something BAD!
Report Post »blazingaway
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:10pmIf a crime of passion is excusable or in any way justifiable for the one doing the killing then killing such a person out of passion for having killed another person should also be excusable. She may have been stupid for not leaving and for confronting him, but that doesn’t excuse him from killing her. Death is the only just sentence for this *******.
Report Post »momrules
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:08pmWhat in the world is wrong with some people? It was HER fault? The jerk.
Report Post »TXPilot
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:02pmUgh, it’s like watching Geraldo in drag.
Report Post »ThePostman
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:00pmNancy obviously has no lawyer ability left, she can’t think logically, she is ruled by emotion. Maybe she has PTSD too. The friends tried to speak eloquently, calmly, and non-inflammatory, but Nancy insisted on going postal on him. Can’t she even control herself enough to not call him names? He was being respectful to her. She certainly did not reciprocate. He was merely speaking his opinion. Are we not all entitled to that without being verbally assaulted?
Maybe we need to go back and review her own assault. Perhaps she started that fight as well and now pretends to be the victim.
Report Post »BonnieBlueFlag
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:11pmAre “we all” entitled to go on Nancy Grace’s show and say whatever nutty blame-the-victim cr@p we want without being “verbally assaulted” (an oxymoron as an assault is violence and words are non-violent)? In a word: NO.
Report Post »trlooksbeyond
Posted on January 15, 2012 at 6:08pmWhile I agree, Nancy is nuts, it still really shocks me that anyone could see this guy as respectful, rational or in any way reasonable!
Report Post »NOTvotingforRomney
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:00pmCome on.
To be fair, the majority of people DID wonder WHY a woman alone in a hotel room WITH A SUSPECTED KILLER STRANGER would bother to google his name on his laptop while he is out getting food/drink/coffee instead of leaving as soon as she found out WHEN she had the opportunity. I bet Natalie Halloway would have loved to have had that escape opportunity this idiot woman squandered.
This women didn’t deserve to die but her stupidity got her killed. Hard to feel sorry for her.
Report Post »ThePostman
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 9:54pmNancy Grace is a disgrace. She is uncivil, rude, overly-emotional. She belongs in National Enquirer.
Report Post »Uranium Wedge
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:07pmYeah, but what a rush huh?
Report Post »Kisses6350
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 10:37amSo, is it fair to say Nancy Grace is an angry “White Woman”?…………………..
Report Post »JessicaChasmar
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 9:52pmHe’s either being paid an exorbitant amount of money to spout this nonsense, or he’s connected with the murder. No one could possibly be this sheepishly loyal.
Report Post »stage9
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 9:51pmSo much for “innocent until proven guilty” hey Nancy? Way to be objective. As a lawyer aren’t you supposed to be impartial?
Report Post »eagle2715
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 9:56pm….he confessed and pleaded guilty…….
Report Post »SoCaLCapitalist
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 9:57pmJoran pleaded guilty today what are you talking about?
Report Post »single stack
Posted on January 12, 2012 at 6:58amShe convicted Casey Anthony 2 years before her trial.
Report Post »ULYSSESG
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 9:49pmAnything Nancy Grace says is a PILE OF SHT. CARELESS BOUT THIS FAT BIATCH.
Report Post »SoCaLCapitalist
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 9:56pmI’m not a fan of Nancy barely watch the show, but she should of kept her cool and say if he wasn’t a murderer Flores had nothing to fear. So how did Jorans friend know he was dangerous?
Report Post »Why would you say Joran is dangerous. Nancy fumbled bigtime, she might of got a witness for the Holloway case.
phillipwgirard
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:10pm@SOCIALCAPITOLIST Ditto
Report Post »LeadNotFollow
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 9:48pmIf Ludwick is blaming the victim, then maybe he should be investigated. Where was Ludwick when the first girl Natalee Holloway went missing?
I like Nancy Grace. She’s feisty.
Report Post »aquablue
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 9:48pmi couldn‘t take more than a minute of listening to van der sloot’s most dedicated admirer. what would he say if it were his sister? the girl didn’t know until after she was in the room with him. too late at that point.
Report Post »random357
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 9:46pmThis is the first time I ever saw some one at CNN get it right and do the right thing.
Report Post »maroon67
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 9:40pmThe only time I like Nancy… this be the one… that guy needs to check in!
Report Post »Dotado
Posted on January 11, 2012 at 9:34pmOh man…the herd needs thinning!
Report Post »