Estimates of Gadhafi’s $200 Billion Wealth Would Have Made Him the Richest Person in the World
- Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:12pm by
Christopher Santarelli
- Print »
- Email »
The Libyan tyrant Moammar Gadhafi was thought to have hoarded billions in assets from his people but new estimates show more hidden treasures than once thought. These discoveries make Gadhafi one of the world’s wealthiest leaders, and possibly the wealthiest person in the world. The Los Angeles Times on the staggering discovery:
“(Gadhafi) secretly salted away more than $200 billion in bank accounts, real estate and corporate investments around the world before he was killed, about $30,000 for every Libyan citizen and double the amount that Western governments previously had suspected, according to senior Libyan officials.
The new estimates of the deposed dictator’s hidden cash, gold reserves and investments are ‘staggering,’ one person who has studied detailed records of the asset search said Friday.”
If the $200 billion estimate is true, Gadhafi would have been at his death the wealthiest person in the world, more than doubling Carlos Slim’s total net worth of $74 Billion, who was deemed the richest man in the world by Forbes Magazine in 2011.
U.S. and European authorities said Friday that they intended to quickly hand over Gadhafi’s frozen assets to the transitional Libyan government and the Libyan people, a third of which live in poverty.
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 690 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 487 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 375 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 337 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 326 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 310 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 326 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 224 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 148 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 310 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (98)
SkyeOne
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 4:01amSo why didn’t he just get out of Libya and buy an island somewhere?
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 5:03amHere’s a good place to put this I guess. I see that Fox Business is going on the attack against Glenn Beck “doomsday cult”.
Anyone that thinks that Fox has an ounce of integrity needs slapped upside their head.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 6:07amAnd before the lunatic fringe leftist nutjobs come on here and bemoan the Libyan moron for raping the earth of non sustainable resources (in other words a finite amount known as PEAK oil), crude oil is abiotic, not a fossil fuel. Coal is a fossil fuel, shale in the long term is not a sustainable energy source, but good old planet earth produces the crude that we drill, and it’s a process that will continue as long as the engine under the plates (lithosphere) drives continental drift (aka plate tectonics). As long as the ocean floor converges, subducts, and diverges, abiotic crude will be produced.
Man does not have the power to out produce the earth.
Report Post »MomaGrisley2
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 7:31amMaybe the entire point of the world killing him was to remove his wealth from him. Maybe he did not want to play the NEW WORLD ORDER game. Maybe this is why he had to go. And the head of Syria…is he in the same boat. The former ruler of Egypt was also very wealthy. I think they are trying to destroy all major wealth holders (like here in the US) that don’t want to play the game. Time will tell.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 9:12amSo , you think we can be paid the one billion it took to over throw him ? I doubt it……
Report Post »hidden_lion
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 9:14amSo, now we know the rest of the story. They wanted to kill him because his is rich. The first “martyr” of the eat the rich campaign.
Report Post »junkmaninohio
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 11:57amWhy can’t we get reimbursed for the $ 1 billion we spent killing his sorry a**?
Report Post »Jefferson
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 4:23pmThe ones who run the IMF and World Bank wanted to take him out, because he wanted to sell his oil for something OTHER than US dollars, which is what helps the dollar have its strength as the world reserve currency. Same with Saddam, and Iran.
He also wanted to “unite” the States of Africa, and put them on a gold standard.
The big boys don‘t like it when you don’t get into debt with the IMF, so they can give you loan shark loans with outrageous interest, and eventually take over your infrastructure when you can’t pay.
He had ZERO debt.
He’d Nationalized his oil revenue to go back into his infrastructure, and directly back to the people.
Gas was supposedly 14 cents a liter. Utilities were paid by the sate.
If you wanted a car, the state would pay 1/2 of it.
If you got married you got 50k toward your first house.
If you wanted to go to school, it was paid for whether at home or abroad.
He vowed that his own parents would stay in a tent, until all Libyans were housed.
He set up a republic of the different tribes there, that each negotiated their own issues.
I say “supposedly,” because I obviously didn’t live there, but I have put a few hours of research into this guy.
If the MSM is AGAINST them, then that makes me want to look further INTO them.
Let me ask this.
WHY was setting up a CENTRAL BANK one of the FIRST things on the rebels’ “to do list?”
Report Post »Who ARE these “rebels?”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uswDmTjLog
The10thAmendment
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 10:13pm@ Jefferson
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 4:23pm
The ones who run the IMF and World Bank wanted to take him out, because he wanted to sell his oil for something OTHER than US dollars, which is what helps the dollar have its strength as the world reserve currency. Same with Saddam, and Iran.
Report Post »He also wanted to “unite” the States of Africa, and put them on a gold standard.
———————————————————————————————————————
This would align him with the Rothschild family. Their desire is to have the world return to the gold standard as well. If what you’re saying is true, it further convinces me that the Globalists like Soros, Rockefeller, Obama (et al others) will destroy any alternative to the Marxist technocracy they are erecting based on carbon currency/credit backing all economies. That will give me something to explore. Thanks for that thought!
A Conservatarian
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 2:41amThe Rothschilds have him smoked completely :) Some estimates say back in 1850 they were worth $6 billion, with inflation alone that’s over a trillion today by a lot. Other rumors back in the mid 19th century had it they were worth much more than that, but we can deal with the 6 Bill as an example. Of course publicly it’s said the family is only worth a billion or two these days, which to me is horsecrap as that would mean they miraculously lost 95%+ of their wealth while simultaneously retaining majority ownership of DeBeers (and many many more companies, but it just takes one name to make this point and DeBeers does that perfectly).
Course 200 Bill is an amazing amount of money but, I’d rather go with the family who cornered the market on the printing of money and the creation of central banking.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 5:11amLOL. Their estimated wealth is is more than 10 TRILLION dollars. Some people who do fuzzy math estimate it as much as 200 trillion, which seems preposterous. If they employed 1000 investors “48” hours a day 7 days a week it would never be enough to manage 50 trillion, much less 200 trillion.
Possible? I guess so. Realistic? No, not really. I started running a program to follow their wealth and it got so convoluted after a year that showed 7.25 trillion.
Does it really matter when we’re talking about numbers that are impossible to imagine, even for multi-millionaires?
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 5:47amWhen we talk Rothschilds fortunes we talk diamonds, and gold, and “black gold” (with no respect given property to the tune of 50,000 sq miles in Canada alone. The largest land deal in Canadian history).
Something that I find interesting in talking about this family is that they hold about 5 – 8% of the entire volume of produced gold in the world. That makes them the majority shareholder. That amount happens to be greater than all the banks on earth, including the FED, as well as private ownership. I have some physical gold that will keep my family and I fed for a really long time, but it amounts to the dust that the Rothschilds shake off their shoes after climbing their gold throne room in a chamber under the House of Rothschild in Frankfurt.
I DO get the impression though that other major players are running a ponzi scheme not only on us, but on them as well. The move to eliminate fiat cash and rather than backing it with gold, are erecting a world economy based on carbon currency/credits.
Report Post »hidden_lion
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 9:20amactually the knights templar created central banking. There is a book with a theory that the templar survivors were the founders of Switzerland. It’s a good book with some provocative facts to support the theory. All the billions and trillions in the world is worth as much as one lead bullet, true alchemy..It is easy to convert gold to lead..just as Gadhaffi
Report Post »Darla_K
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 9:21amHow much of his wealth was given to him from the USA? I bet he had alot of our tax payer dollars. This is why we must stop giving money to other countries that have corrupt leaders.
Report Post »hidden_lion
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 9:23amThere is only 1.6 trillion dollars in circulation, so their money must not be American dollars. Who care about Build-a-burger rothchilds wackos. The fact is if the people would stay awake and value their freedom, none of those types could have the control they may or may not have. all it takes is a skilled freedom loving marksman.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 4:57pmWealth and money aren’t the same thing. Then you instructed us that if we would stay awake and value freedom. If we didn‘t value our freedom and were sleeping we wouldn’t have any idea where the enemy was coming from.
This very forum is because of people being awake, and others waking up. I come here to learn things I don‘t know and to get others perspectives so that I’m better armed to see clearly where the enemy of my ideals is coming from.
Several good posters here have helped me see things I didn’t otherwise know, and God knows that I’m grateful to them and FOR them.
As for your post saying that The Templar’s invented central banking? The Rothschild family are members of the Knights of Malta.
Report Post »ares338
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 2:04amIf he did indeed have that much money, then it‘s value was meaningless wasn’t it? If you have 5 Lear Jets do you really need a 6th one? He could have gotten away easily a while back but chose to remain because that’s where his identity was. He was useful to the US because he kept most of the radical Muslims in check but our own Radical Muslim in Chief didn’t want the brotherhood held back any longer.
Report Post »cliffattheblaze
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 2:26amHe couldn’t get away. Dictators lose power and they die. It’s that simple. Not only do they die, but their whole family dies. That’s why they hold on for dear life. If they get away, then they get tried for war crimes and they die.
Report Post »mootsagootsa
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 2:03amI guess we’re lucky no country is attaching us because of the OWS crowd and the fast and furious B.S. I see why we stay in debt and give our money away to car companies and solar companies. Who wants to attach a country that’s in debt.
Report Post »jzs
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 12:50amBilly, your memory is too good. No, I don’t have cable and I only occasionally watch Meet the Press. I try to keep up with the news, but I get it almost exclusively from the the internet. Sorry, I don’t get my news from BGTV or any other broadcast or cable station.
Actually I don’t “parrot the paty line.” That would be shallow wouldn’t it? Actually my beliefs began being raised in a Christian family, and then those ideas met the real world as a teenager. In college, as I’m sure your did, I took classes in ethics and philosophy, where young, impressionable minds are asked to look not only at “what” is ethical or not ethical, but “why” those things are ethical or not. And in that period my ideas about ethics congealed and was then set.
Sorry Billy. Some people who want to help the poor actually believe the poor deserve a break, and not just because Rush Limbaugh is against it.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 1:02amGoodness gracious JZS,
Not that any of your posts are ever relevant, but they are even less so when you reply in the WRONG STORY.
WHOM is stoopid now.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 1:04amOh, and nice job shifting the focus.
That saul folks.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 1:26amJZS,
I just re-read your post and saw something I glossed over the first time, and wonder if even you, grasp the significance of ?
You just admitted that you yourself, as a teen in college, had a “Young and impressionable mind”
I need not tell you what that phrase implies.
Sounds to me like you, along with ‘Clive” were quite successfully indoctrinated. Whether you knew it or not. Remember when clive posted here that he had fun in college getting drunk with girls. Put in his 4 years, got his paper, and never really felt like he was indoctrinated. Remember that? That was a jewel. Higher learnin for ya.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 2:21amJZS
You never really addressed my original point.
No cable or broadcast news for you. Just the internet for all your current events.
But yet you seem to have such a deep understanding, or at least you think so, about what takes place each day on FOX.
What internet sources are you frequenting that allow you to form such a deep seated disdain for FOX, and Beck? What are they telling you? How can you claim to have an open mind with such a narrow field of view?
Please list the websites for me. All of them. You want to try a win me over? Give me your news & information sources so that I can do my own research.
I can see no reason why you would deny my request, can you? Can anyone?
Enlighten me.
Report Post »americansfightingforcommonsense
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 8:27amHey JZS.
Report Post »I see your posts and I too would like to know where you get your news on the internet. Could you please enlighten the rest of us so we can catch up to you intellectually? May God Bless the USA.
hidden_lion
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 9:34am“actually believe the poor deserve a break”
Report Post »Why do you believe all the poor actually deserve a break. How do you know they didn’t blow break, after break and that is why they are poor? I believe some poor people just need a bit of a break to get their life going, but the majority of poor in the US are poor because of their own “poor” choices and lack of vision. If they want to change their lives, they need to make the changes. Handouts don’t help them become self sufficient. It is a fact. Look at the statistics of people who go on welfare. How many actually get off of it? What percentage passes the disease on to their children, who they have to get more handouts? I think the welfare system should include actually training and work for money initiatives, and in some cases a bus ticket to move them out of crappy neighborhoods they may have been born in to break the cycle. They need to teach them to fish….
lukerw
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 12:36am200 Bil… well, he was good at something after all!
Report Post »pamela kay
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 1:09amWhere will that money go? Muslim brotherhood Hamas? Obama’s re-election campaign? Just wonderin. It won’t go to help the people.
Report Post »grandmaof5
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 2:18amIt seems only fair, according to Obama and the UN, that Gadahfi‘s wealth should be spread amongst those in the US and around the world who don’t have that much money. After all, Obama wants us to spread our wealth (not his or his cronies) to other countries. I propose that Obama fly over to Libya and tell those people what he proposes to do with their money. Please take Michael Moore, Frances Fox Piven, Jesse, Al, and all the rest of the “spread YOUR wealth” people with you. I’m sure those rebels and future fighting factions will be very receptive. Don’t forget the teleprompter.
Report Post »lobo2525
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 11:34pmHand over it cost us a Billion easy……..plus expenses at least 5 billion should go to the USA. Then we can hand the rest to the people that were fighting us in Iraq…great plan great…
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 2:05amThe money will probably go to the transformation of Africa. The restructural process of Africa would cost way more than $200B, but it’s a helluva start. Africom or the United African Federation is officially online.
Report Post »NotPoliticallyCorrect
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 11:32pmI wonder how much Obama has in hidden assets…just askin’
Report Post »wseling
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 11:43pmI wonder what obama’s cut is.
Report Post »Tronix
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 12:18amFor sure it’s less than expected at this point of the run…..he needs the second term to finish his “job”. And this is including the unexpected bonus of the Nobel Prize. He’s a pretty ambitious community organizer, and that idea of “sharing”, in fact means “I rape everybody in this country”.
Report Post »southernpatriot
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 2:26pm@notpolitcorrect. Great question about how much Oblahblah is worth. Look up “white hat reports” and you will find your answer.
Report Post »Quaddafi was overthrown and killed for three reasons.
1. He had his own gold and was about to form An african currency with it and was going to discontinue using the dollar for oil purchases.
2. OIL and other resources.
3.Libya was discovered to have the richest CLEAN WATER supply on the whole african continent. Think about what is more important in africa to live–Hint you can’t drink oil!!!
The NWO are systematically taking over all the natural resources from the weakest countries that can’t defend themselves.
Since the overthrow of Libya over 20,000 shoulder fired anti-aircraft missles have gone missing.
vampiric aristocracy
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 11:25pmI have my issues with this,and i may or may not get attacked for it. Granted hes responsible for the lockerbee airliner bombing and other terrorist acts,but with pressure,he became very invaluable in regards to the war on terror.it was wrong. He should have been brought to trial and by us supporting the muslim brotherhood and the arab uprisings OUR GOVERNMENT DIRECTLY SUPPORTED TERRORISM.we and NATO are responsible for the regression and deevolution of a culture and society under that under his rule,men and women HAD and i repeat HAD equal rights yeah he was a megalomanic nut,but he loved and took care of his people.they had free health care free collegiate education$ 50k to couples who married…only the stinking muslims hated him cause he didn’t take their radical garbage,before anyone celebrates this look real at what we have done…we made libya back to a third world country.
Report Post »asybot12
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 12:32amSome how I agree I think what is coming down the pike like sharia law in all of Northern Africa is a far more worrying aspect. I surely hope Glennis really, really wrong on this but I am 100% sure he has got it right and my friends is a scary proposition . Prepare
Report Post »mootsagootsa
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 1:45amIt’s been rumored that Gadhafi was going to only accept gold for oil and not accept dollars.anymore. Do you think this had any thing to do with him being elliminated after many years of him cooling it.
Report Post »KangarooJack
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 1:48amGee, I answered you (and no I did not attack you at all) yet, my post went “somewhere”??? hmm
Report Post »hidden_lion
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 9:38amYou are right, Obama is only supporting the overthrow of Dictators that are semi-cooperative with the US. Our out and out enemies, he does, says nothing.
Report Post »abbygirl1994
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 11:25pmCertainly enough money to build Libya without American taxpayers having too.. So lets not squander it Libya!!
Report Post »barber2
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 11:21pmKnow what ? I don’t give a whatever about Libya. I am much more concerned about what is “occupying” our American cities. All the rest is the “distraction” which enables us to lose sight of what we should be controlling . Focus on our inner- city “Occupies.” That is what now matters.
Report Post »82dAirborne
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:53pmAnd now our fearful leader is on to Uganda!! Look out Monaco; you may be next!!!!!
Report Post »KangarooJack
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:44pmIt’s not the Condoleeza Rice photo collection, nor the gold plumbing, nor the gold gun, nope, not even his famous designer outfits that constituted his wealth.
Report Post »It’s what he had-what he now doesn’t have-and what we will wish that he never had in the 1st place.
dealer@678
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:55pm200 Billion . Would he now give that amount for his soul. I would
Report Post »cassandra
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:41pmthe people that live in poverty will STILL live in poverty, and the muslim brotherhood will take all the money
Report Post »82dAirborne
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:55pmThe Brotherhood won’t have to take it. Mr. Obama will give it to them. After all they are just the youth rising up.
Report Post »paperpushermj
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:58pmThat is whats left after those who started the War namely the Italians,French and the British decide they can raid those secrete bank accounts and NO ONE WILL EVER KNOW.
Report Post »RossPoldark
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 11:01pmObama is their beloved son after all. Allah and the rest of the muslim world can stick it in their turbins. They should all be forced to eat with their right hands, while eating BLT sandwiches and chicharones!!!
Report Post »CatB
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:37pmWhy are we sending them aid $$$ … insanity!
TEA!
Report Post »cobra two
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:34pmYou better believe that Barry is thinking If I could just get my hands on some of that money.I could buy my way to 4 more years.
Report Post »the hawk
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:43pmThis my friends is why this man HAD to die ! AND damn glad of it !
Report Post »cobra two
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:29pm200 Billion in wealth and this ass clown lived in a tent.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:36pmNo one ever accused him of having common sense, just a ruthless intellect. So if the new Libyan govt is going to gain the 200 Billion, why not pay the USA back for our expeses in aiding them?
Report Post »Rajabear1
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:52pmGet this, Lindsy Graham and Mc Cain are saying we need to go in and nation build because the Libyans have the money and would pay us back. They are licking their chops on the oil reserves and gold. Unbelievable. Stay the heck out! BTW time for you two court jester to go along with anyone who aligns themselves with your sorry butts.
Report Post »hidden_lion
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 9:49amGraham and McCain need to be removed or beat to a pulp. No more foreign aid, no more rebuilding this or that country. If we have to use military power on them, they need to rebuild themselves. Let the Euro’s rebuild them. Let the Euro’s protect themselves for a change. Close all our bases, bring our boys back. We have global strike capability, we don’t need foreign bases.
Report Post »TSUNAMI-22
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:26pmAll that wealth didn’t save him from a few 45 cent bullets did it?
Report Post »cobra two
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:24pm200 Billion in wealth and the sonofabitch lived in a tent.
Report Post »NOBAMA201258
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:24pmThey are going to give those assets to the muslim brotherhood no doubt,isn’t that a horrifying prospect?That will buy more weapons for these “peace loving” people! Were the families of the Pan Am 103 victims ever compensated for their loss?
Report Post »Hobbs57
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:35pmGood point !! They deserve to be !!
Report Post »CatB
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:41pmWe are also sending them aid ….
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/world_now/2011/10/us-libya-clinton-aid.html
Report Post »rose-ellen
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:41pmI hope the americans don‘t get another penny of libya’s money. The victims of the pan am attack already got tons of moneyfrom libya. Gaddafiis money belongs to the people of libya. no one else-thogh i hope the europeans get good deals on oil supplies. America-only if it ceases being the beligerent war mongering power in the mid east. War crime tribumals for their illigal invasions and occupations,would be appropeiate too.
Report Post »paperpushermj
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 11:10pmRose
Report Post »Speaking of the Pan Am Flight Rose I consider it a missed opportunity, that your family didn’t benefit.
booger71
Posted on October 23, 2011 at 12:21amNo Rose, that’s my money and I want it now!
Report Post »WhippedPuppy
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:22pmOnly $200B? Yes Madam Secretary, we need to provide financial support to the new regime (I mean democracy).
Report Post »Trestin Meacham
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:20pmHow about we charge them for our war costs?
Report Post »broker0101
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:16pmLet’s see, 42 years of foreign aid plus Swiss interest? Sounds about right.
Report Post »SilentReader
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:16pmYeah. As if we believe the globalist thugs.
Report Post »82dAirborne
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:13pmWell at least that gives Mr. Obama something to shoot for.
Report Post »jzs
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:34pmDang, that money hoarding and the brutal oppression of his own people aboad and acts of terrorism against western nations. Still the US shouldn’t have lead the international effort remove him. The devil you know is better than the one you don’t. Lybia might soon be ruled by Muslims.
But other countries lead the way, this is in no way an Obama victory. As the US is off in other countries increasing our debt by leaps and bounds fighting three or four other wars, we were all nice and asked some other countries to help with the effort. And other nations helped out!
That‘s President Obama’s policy, the Obama Doctrine, to get other countries to share the risk and cost when international cooperation is needed. Republicans say the US should kill all the bad guy themselves, but President Obama thinks other countries ought to sometime bear the burden.
Of course that’s BS. The US should go it alone and kick everybodies behind, and let the other countries hide behind our skirt.
Report Post »broker0101
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:41pmJZS, finally the death of a brutal Muslim terrorist is a
Report Post »good thing to idiots like you. It’s about time.
82dAirborne
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 10:45pmThe Obama doctrine is to get himself re-elected and to line his pockets along the way. Period.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 11:20pmWhat matters to the libs is who does the killin’
Matters not who gets killed.
Report Post »jzs
Posted on October 22, 2011 at 11:53pmBilly, I vehemently disagree with you. You’re wrong and you are an imbecile. You’re a community organizer, someone trying to bring people together, people who share common beliefs to work to work towards a common goal. You are trying to get a group of people to speak with a single voice.
That’s what Hitler and Stalin did.
I’m kidding. Good for you. I disagree with you on politics but I support your efforts and the time you spend on this cause. You are definitely a true American. But still you’re stoopid.
Report Post »