Gates: Gadhafi Taking Bodies He’s Killed and Placing Them at Coalition Attack Sites
- Posted on March 27, 2011 at 10:38am by
Emily Esfahani Smith
- Print »
- Email »
According to intelligence gathered by the Department of Defense, Gadhafi has ordered his forces to take dead bodies from hospitals and morgues and place them at the sites of coalition attacks–having the dead bodies pose as coalition-inflicted civilian casualties.
Speaking on CBS’s Face the Nation, in an interview that will air today, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said, “We do have a lot of intelligence reporting of Gadhafi taking the bodies of people he‘s killed and putting them at sites that we’ve attacked.” There’s no evidence, Gates said, of civilian casualties caused by coalition forces.
CNN reports:
Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi is placing bodies of people his regime has killed at the sites of some missile strikes by the U.S.-led coalition, according to intelligence reports cited by U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates.
In an interview to be broadcast Sunday on the CBS program “Face the Nation,” Gates said he was unaware of coalition attacks causing civilian casualties.
“The truth of the matter is we have trouble coming up with proof of any civilian casualties that we have been responsible for,” Gates said in the interview conducted Saturday…
Asked how often it has happened, Gates replied: “We have a number of reports of that.”…
A senior defense official told CNN on Sunday that the U.S. military has information gleaned from intelligence sources that Gadhafi has tasked his aides to search morgues and hospitals for dead bodies to be posed as civilian casualties.





















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (68)
SANE_I think
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 12:48pmNon-sequitur…….My response was supposed to be directed to you, celebrated a friends birthday last night. I’m afraid I am paying for it today :)
Report Post »Non-sequitur
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 2:09pmAh, I wondered how your reply would fit on what Katayno said :)
But still, I don‘t understand why you’d post something like that. I know a lot of Muslims. All of them are friendly, honorable and fully integrated while still keeping their faith in Islam. They’d probably be very confused if I called them “bad Muslims” because they fit into American society. Why would you post something that would describe them as people incompatible with life in America while millions of them are living in America quite peacefully?
I see that you said you don’t agree 100% with the chain email you posted, but that would still imply you agree with a significant part of it. My point is that I just cannot see how someone could hold two almost mutually opposed sets of opinions on a group of people.
Anyhow, get some rest and get rid of that hangover :) Here’s an old cure I know helps wonderfully (dutch roots, you know): http://thedutchstore.com/webstore/productinfo.aspx?itemno=01104&code=104&list=104&type=ITEMCATEGORY
Report Post »mill
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 12:39pmALTHOUGH I do NOT believe we have a place in Libya and Obama has definitely oversteppe his scope of power,nothing will be done about it.
Report Post »…ALL IS FAIR IN WAR. Seriously, does anyone actually believe that if we are attacked, the enemy will say…”oh don’t get those civilians, BE CAREFUL!!!l”
..Hell no, war is war, you kill everything in site, EVERYTHING, EVERYONE in your way.
fishstx777
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:53amIf we would have did a special ops at night,when kadoofys closest confidants looked for asylum and would have given his location we wouldnt be talking about this now . he would be undearly deceased.
Report Post »Solar Power
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:51amCan someone please tell Mr.Obama that the people Qaddafi has be slaughtering over the past three week are SEIU members and this could potentially effect his voting base. What was that Tee Time Again?
Report Post »sarg356
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:45amOld trick. has been done many times before through out history. Shock value is priceless.
Report Post »Whostolemypig
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:35amWonder of Obama mentions this in his speech. http://uruknet.info/?p=m76189&hd=&size=1&l=e
Report Post »Rickfromillinois
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:30amAlthough the munitions used are very accurate and I wouldn’t be surprised if they are placing dead bodies next to where the strikes take place, I find it hard to believe that there have not been any civilian causalities from the air strikes as Gates seems to be saying. Frankly if he is saying that their sources can’t find any instances of civilians being killed by the air strikes then I think that either their sources are so bad that everything they are saying is suspect or that the administration is not being completely honest with us. We don’t target civilians, fine, they are very careful to try to make sure that civilian causalities are kept to a minimum, great, to say that they have always been 100% successful to hit the targets dead on, no mistakes were made, and made, and there have not been any civilian causalities, I find hard to believe.
Report Post »macombman
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:22amA rather humorous yet intelligent video about President Obama answering a few questions after explaining his invasion of Libya without congressional consent.
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsiL4Qto5X8
drattastic
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:34amThat was pretty good .It’s like what Obama would say if he were telling the whole truth.
Report Post »FLyoverman
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:19amWhich is why when you decide to use military power, you use it reluctantly, but you use it like killing an ant with an anvil. The sooner you dispatch your opponent the better. There is no way we win the propaganda war in the Mideast if we fight a protracted campaign.
Report Post »tankerBigRed1
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:15amIsn’t amazing – we have gotten so good dat we can dump all those cruise missiles & not kill 1 civilian !
Report Post »drattastic
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:26amDidn’t you know liberals rock at waging war.
Report Post »Richard Compton
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:15amAs he’s feeding us this idea, Hillary looks like a bobble head doll shaking her her up and down in agreement to everthing he’s saying do you suppose they practiced this act. It wasn’t very convincing for me, was that a trial baloon? Guess we have to wait for the evening news to see what the line is then, wether or not the baloon crashed or not.
Report Post »drattastic
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:23amThe media will do their leftwing duty and sell it hard.
Report Post »paperpushermj
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:48amHillary gave a heads up on what POTUS will say Monday in his address to the Nation. Our European Allies get Oil from Libya, therefor they called in IOUs for their partition in Iraq and Afghanistan. Also noticed no conversation on who might replace the present Libyan government. This is turning into a CLUSTER @#$% and have O confidence that the people in Washington have a clue.
Report Post »paperpushermj
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:15amLibyan leader Moammar Gadhafi is placing bodies of people his regime has killed at the sites of some missile strikes by the U.S.-led coalition.
Report Post »………………………………………………………
Thats nice. Now Mr Gates tell me why the hell are we in Libya. Why in the hell are we exceeding the UN Mandate and attacking Tanks,Artillery and other military targets in support of the anti government forces? As best you…. can define who the anti-government people are?
chickenlittle
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:42amInteresting speech from Biden below:
Vice President Joe Biden has a very clear idea of what should happen to a president who orders U.S. military forces to launch an attack on a foreign country without congressional authorization: impeachment.
With some voices saying President Barack Obama should face impeachment for attacking Moammar Gadhafi’s forces in Libya, a videotape has surfaced from the 2007 campaign trail showing Biden threatening to impeach President George W. Bush if he attacked Iran without the approval of Congress.
“I have written an extensive legal memorandum with the help of a group of legal scholars who are sort of a stable of people, the best-known constitutional scholars in America, because for 17 years I was chairman of the Judiciary Committee,” Biden said in an interview with MSNBC’s Chris Matthews on “Hardball.”
“I asked them to put together [for] me a draft, which I’m now literally riding between towns editing, that I want to make clear and submit to the United States Senate pointing out the president has no authority to unilaterally attack Iran.
“And I want to make it clear, I want it on the record … if he does, as chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee and former chair of the Judiciary Committee, I will move to impeach him.”
He went on to say: “I think the best deterrent is for the president to know, even at the end of his term, we would move and move to follow through with that so his legacy would be marred for all time if he acted in what was clearly, clearly an impeachable offense.
“In the absence of that, what happens is, and you‘re going to think I’m joking about this — I’m not. If you’re going to impeach George Bush you better impeach Cheney first. Not a joke.”
Report Post »Ellbee
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 12:27pm@CHICKENLITTLE
Report Post »Yet another brilliant editorial from braying jackass #2. Their double standards have no limits. Moron.
drattastic
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:14amThe Lib media will run with this all day long if it’s true or not .No follow up required or investigating needed ,anything to cover for their Disgrace in Chief .I don’t really care if there is collateral damage or not .I just know if this was a Republican administration the scrutiny would be heavy and the story would be looked at as a lie first and be treated as such.The collateral damage would be pushed hard by the progressive “journalist” .
Report Post »UpstateNYConservative
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:10amSo, under Bush there were 100,000 Iraqi civilian deaths but under Obow there are none; we miraculously haven’t killed a single Libyan civilian?
Actually, if we just enforced a no-fly zone and didn’t strike ground targets in the first place, civilian casualties wouldn’t be an issue.
Report Post »Whostolemypig
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:31amNo troops on the ground either. Well, maybe except these http://uruknet.info/?p=m76189&hd=&size=1&l=e
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:03amObummer says that K-Dog would not be removed. If this story prove’s true all restraints should be removed. , and an elimination should take place. Our problem only starts with his removal. Right Barry.
Report Post »FORE
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:15amMr Obama may say that Quaddafi will not be removed, yet the Europeans and some of the newer additions from the Middle East may have other ideas. Even Israel may have other ideas if the need came down to it…
(Phone rings: “Quaddafi…
Report Post »{Phone: BOOOOM!
{Sign: New dictator position open, office needs renovation work.
dcwu
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:02amThere can be no sympathy for the “muslim world”. It is a den of cruel hateful murderers and slavers, no more and no less.
Report Post »Non-sequitur
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 12:06pmThere can be no sympathy for the “jewish world”. It is a den of cruel hateful murderers and slavers, no more and no less.
There can be no sympathy for the “black world”. It is a den of cruel hateful murderers and slavers, no more and no less.
Just giving you a heads up on how you’re sounding.
A little helpful tip: If you have to paint a huge part of the population with the broad brush, exchange the word “Muslim” with “Jew”. If you sound like a damn Nazi, you may want to rethink your statement.
Report Post »mayihelpyou
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:01amI see either side being plausible as to who’s responsible for the bodies. When you shoot missiles at people they have a good chance of being killed. we know what the madman is capable of.
Report Post »rienheart
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 10:59amStupid is as stupid does.
Report Post »NOBALONEY
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 10:59ammoammar gadhafi has friends in high places. I wonder how many times the president will mention his name ,and the atrocities he’s doing now, and the pan am disaster. What about the bomber, is he stiil alive? Wasn’t he dying, and that’s why the british released him? There are no more real statesman, or diplomates anymore. It’s all sleezy, slimmy politics all over the world. Face the nation? more like, Two-faced the nation.
Report Post »hauschild
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 10:57amClassic! Weekend at Qaddafi’s!
Also reminds me of the movie Fistfull of Dollars where Clint set up those two dead soldiers at the grave site and the dude that managed the hotel Clint was staying in was giving him an earful about it.
Report Post »HippoNips
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 10:51amHow are they suppose to ‘come up with proof’ is no troops are on the ground?
Report Post »Non-sequitur
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 12:02pmTroops? No. Humanitarian organizations, Red Cross and teams of reporters? Yes.
Report Post »blackcatrun
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 10:47amWhat a way to contradict ones self. “the true meaning of the whole interview is they dont know so they are making it up” The obama regiem must think the masses are extremely stupid because they are extremely stupid.
Report Post »drattastic
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:20amMany of the masses are stupid or at the very least totally uninformed.Too busy hitting the clubs or the monster truck rallies or fingering their iphones for the latest pop single or app.
Report Post »hogtrashhd
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 10:46amHe’s been collecting bodies and storing them all month.. that’s well known.. wonder why they‘re acting like it’s new news??? and he hasn’t been “searching” morgues etc.. he’s been killing them for a month and keeping them on ice.. no new news here…
Report Post »Non-sequitur
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:20amGhaddafi said himself that that’s what he would do. What exactly does he expect now?
Report Post »BetterDays
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 10:44amGadhafi would do this in a New York second no doubt, but once again Gates is espousing conjecture. Gates can’t prove Gadhfi is or is not doing this, but heck it makes booming a country so much cleaner if the leader is a psychopath.
Report Post »Ord aud Chao, order from chaos, freemason motto.
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:02amThe one thing still troubling me from this is there is a mathmatical branch called chaos theory; in which one small event, when introduced into a linear plan (A to B to C, etc.), can cause changes to happen rapidly and in totally unexpected ways.
I feel that is what is happening here centered on Libya.
The two factors I see in it are Al Quada, and the Muslum Brotherhood.
I wonder what the third one would be? One of his own bodyguards doing him in?
Report Post »fertlmind
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 10:40amI don’t really know WHO to believe
Report Post »They are ALL liars
Obama Bin Lying
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 10:47amThis is a typical tactic also used by Palistinians/Hamas/Hezbolla/Al Qaeda and the associated press. They do it to foster Propaganda and sympathy with the Muslim world. Then they get angry when people don’t trust “moderate muslims”
Moderate Muslims are like a bigfoot. People say they exist….but no one has proof they are real.
Report Post »Insipid
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 10:52am@Obama Bin Lying
“Moderate Muslims are like a bigfoot. People say they exist….but no one has proof they are real.”
Brilliant!!!, I have never heard it put in better words. I’m going to use this one in future debates.
Report Post »VanGrungy
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 10:53amShades of Bosnia… muslims will kill to create ‘victims’ for western media consumption…
MSM Drones lap it up
Report Post »MAULEMALL
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 10:56amWell until we started indiscriminately bombing thier country there were no bodies to stack…
Mr president… Mission Accomplished.
Report Post »Ironmaan
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 10:56amThey are indeed all lias. A little off topic but look at what they said about the healtcare bill. That was ALL BS. Said he was going to get out of Guantanimo, still there (im happy bout that though), said he was getting us out of afhanistan and iraq and were still there, jobs (where are they). The goal of this administration is globalism through socialism and through that light we shall see his intent in Libia and the world.
Report Post »http://guerillatics.com
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 10:59amOnce again we see a standard of double talk – reports of this and reports of that without anything of solid and reliable information being found out (i.e. the “TRUTH”).
While I have no doubts that little rat fink of a lifesucking leech from lawerville called Quaddafi would resort to such matters, the fact still remains we should not be making guesses, what is needed is to have hard, and as reliable FACTS as possible.
With the administration, who knows anymore what is really going on other than their heads are on a total tail spin faster than a merry-go-round with Al Gore and Biden on board.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:07am@MauleMaul:
How about this part:
Mr President…Mission Accomplished.
Report Post »Mr President…Impeachment is next.
Mr President…War Crimes are following (American Courts)
Ruler4You
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:17amThe limits of depravity are non existent.
Report Post »Non-sequitur
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:19am“Brilliant!!!, I have never heard it put in better words. I’m going to use this one in future debates.”
I take it you like to get laughed at a lot?
Report Post »SANE_I think
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:29amCan a good Musli m be a good American?
Short Answer is NO!
This question was forwarded to a friend who worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years.
The following is his reply:
Theologically – no . . . Because his allegiance is to Alla h, The moon Go d of Arabia
Religiously – no… Because no other religion is accepted by His Alla h except Isla m (Qura n, 2:256)(Kor an)
Scripturally – no… Because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Isla m and the Qura n.
Geographically – no… Because his allegiance is to Mecc a, to which he turns in prayer five times a day.
Socially – no… Because his allegiance to Isla m forbids him to make friends with Christia ns or Je ws..
Politically – no…Because he must submit to the mulla hs (spiritu al leaders), who teach annihilation of
Israe l and destruction of America, the great Sata n.
Domestically – no… Because he is instructed to marry four Women and beat and
scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Qur an 4:34)
Intellectually – no… Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is
based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.
Philosophically – no… Because Isla m, Muhamma d, and the Qura n do not allow freedom of religion
and expression. Democracy and Isla m cannot co-exist. Every Musli m government is either
dictatorial or autocratic.
Spiritually – no… Because when we declare ‘one nation under God,
‘ the Christian’s God is loving and kind, while Alla h is NEVER referred
to as Heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in The Qura n’s 99 excellent names.
Therefore, after much study and deliberation…. Perhaps we should be very suspicious
of ALL MUSLI MS in this country. – - –
They obviously cannot be both ‘good’ Musli ms and good Americans.
Report Post »Source: Dr. Peter Hammond
SANE_I think
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:31amI do not agree %100, but it is worthy of debate? FWIW
Report Post »Katayno
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:33amThey did it in Iraq and Afghanistan, too. Believe it. In Gaza they had photos of a guy laying in the street dead and the next frame was up walking around. They are smart enough to play to our media and for a long time it worked until we caught them The lamestream media still love it, though.
Report Post »Non-sequitur
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 11:59am@SANE_I think
The chain email you posted isn’t worthy of debate because in debate I expect both sides to be honest and present facts not falsehoods. It’s an anti-Muslim rant not based in reality.
Report Post »restorehope
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 12:34pmGates and this admin are cowardly trying to protect themselves by saying ‘they have no proof of civilian casualties caused by us on the ground’. Obama throws us into another war and now he doesn’t want to claim responsibility for causing deaths? Wake up, O, because that’s what happens when you go to war. A war, which by the way, he entered without anyone’s approval but with his own executive decision. It pains me to think this president is making all kinds of ‘executive orders’ that drastically affect our country while never before holding an executive position in his life. Where is Trump when we need him to say, “You’re fired!”
Report Post »SANE_I think
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 12:39pmKATAYNO,
Report Post »I saw it in a article I read. As I stated, I am not %100 in agreement. I work with Muslims, I do GIS work and interact with middle eastern engineers. I have a great relationship with them and showed them this and asked, do you agree? Ali said that it does, in fact apply, but ONLY to a small % of truly HARD LINE rads. I trust him and respect his opinion. He is a true believer and I respect that. One day I saw him capture a spider in his office. He then opened his window and released the spider? He did not know I saw this. Later, I asked him why he did this, he responded, Allah has respect for all life, it is forbidden to harm any creature less self defense. A true Muslim! He and I have had many talks about “the world”. It is interesting to hear his point of view!
SANE_I think
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 12:43pmJust noticed some spelling errors, sorry about that. I have seen some take issue with such things here.
Report Post »jackeric61
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 1:56pmDon’t believe anything they say. There will be civilian deaths by our attacks but we will never know the truth. This is all setting up to bad for Israel because when the dust settles and all of these countries have new gov’t Israel will be there 1st target. and I’m sure that or commander will do nothing to help, he will watch it all unfold into one big ugly war.
Report Post »avenger
Posted on March 27, 2011 at 4:51pmgeez…what a surprise…good pr move….hey people this not a video game,he wants to survive.the rebels are radical islamists that will make him look like mother teresa…wake up ! owe bama is helping to build the caliphate…
Report Post »independentvoteril
Posted on March 28, 2011 at 6:59pmThis is what happens when you tell a lies.. you get a tangled web and NO ONE believes YOU either..I wouldn’t put it past G to do something like that.. HOWEVER.. I don‘t beleive that GATES wouldn’t LIE about it either.. since OBAMA and his WHOLE administration are a bunch of LIARS on EVERYTHING.. including yet NOT limited to changing the name of bills they want passed to try and FOOL the people.. I am sorry but after pictures coming out of Iraq.. well.. lets say our military would NOT take responsibility unless they are caught on camera..
Report Post »