Gay Republican Presidential Candidate Fred Karger Accuses Pro-Marriage Activist of Being Secretly Divorced
- Posted on April 12, 2012 at 8:39pm by
Mytheos Holt
- Print »
- Email »
Republican protest candidate for President Fred Karger hasn‘t exactly been getting to run the Presidential campaign he’d like to run. The openly gay Republican has only outpaced one of the four major contenders (Ron Paul) once in the Puerto Rico primary, and has been forgotten alongside New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson. However, with recent controversial personal attacks, Karger may have finally found his fifteen seconds of fame.
Specifically, Karger accused National Organization for Marriage President Maggie Gallagher of lying about her marital status, accusing Gallagher of either marrying her current husband in order to help him get a green card, or not admitting that she was divorced. Stay classy, Karger. Buzzfeed has the story:
“I asked Maggie if she was still living in New York, and she told me that she moved to Washington, DC nearly three years ago. What about her husband Raman Srivastav? She allegedly married this East Indian man 19 years ago after living as an unwed mother for 11 years. No one has ever seen Maggie with Raman. Wonder if they really did get married? If so, maybe so he could get a green card?”
Karger also flags the absence of a wedding ring on Gallagher’s finger.[...]
“I’m taking the gloves off,” he said. “I’ve been a little reticent to go after [Gallagher] personally, but no more.”[...]
“They just make up all kind of stuff about me,” [Gallagher] said. “It doesn’t really matter. I could be divorced and I still could not be for gay marriage. I don‘t really see that it’s relevant. It is a fact — I am in fact married. I’ve only been married once. I am not about to get a divorce.”
Karger has been on the warpath against the National Organization for Marriage ever since documents were released which allegedly demonstrated plans to exploit lack of comfort with homosexuality among blacks. Arguably, the articles in question simply centered on finding pro-family spokespeople from minority communities in order to make accusations of bigotry less politically palatable.
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 691 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 489 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 375 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 340 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 326 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 311 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 326 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 224 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 148 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 311 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (104)
YoshiFD3S
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:49pmBruce P.,
While I would agree that the word usage by some opposers here to homosexuality is inappropriate, offensive, and unnecessary….
I would argue the point that having any form of a homosexual leader in charge, presents the strong possibility for bias and my concern with homosexuality, besides how my faith describes it is this:
You ask “How does it affect me?”, here’s my answer. The problem is that when you openly allow or solicit actions or lifestyles that are in opposition to mankind’s very genetic make-up….basically the “born gay” myth….you are fueling a falsely-accredited idea that people are not responsible or accountable for their actions/life-styles..that the excuse of being “born” that way, is somehow justifiable.
The fact of the matter is, even the leading pro-homosexual activists of the 60‘s and 70’s admitted that their intention behind harassing various doctors and medical review board personnel wasn’t because they were upset over the scientific description of homosexuality as being a mental (chosen) lifestyle….rather, they were simply trying to gain political attention and power.
It affects me/us/everyone, because it begs the question…When does it stop? First, you want to allow homosexual marriage…but will it stop there? What about the next activist group that wants polygamy? You are nurtering a culture that will do anything to have their PERSONAL LIFESTYLE decisions be deemed “acceptible” and “justified” somehow. Whe
Report Post »Bruce P.
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:16pmA stronger possibility for bias? A bias for what?
As for whether homosexuality is a life-style or if birth determines it, saying being born gay is a “myth” or a “falsely-accredited idea” is itself a falsehood. All scientific evidence would suggest that it is in a person’s genetic make-up to be homosexual. (For instance…http://discovermagazine.com/2007/jun/born-gay) There is no scientific evidence to suggest it is purely based on choice or a mental-defect. Those claiming that homosexuality is based on either or that there is not a suggested link to genetics have no scientific backing for their claims.
You still have no answered how it affects you. If what two consenting adults (or even a group of adults) want to do something that brings no harm to others, how does that affect you?
I am not nurturing a culture that harms anyone but a culture of live-and-let-live, of mind your own business and let people live their lives as they see fit. (And again, absolutely no scientific evidence that it is a personal decision. The Bible and your fear of catching gay are not science). You, however, are nurturing a culture of fear and interference in people’s lives.
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:44pmBruce – Your problem is that you’re part of the live and let live culture. Those cultures don’t survive. And what’s your opinion on other forms of marriage?
Report Post »Bruce P.
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 5:11pmPlease, give us an example of such a culture.
What I think of other forms of marriage is irrelevant (but, I care not what consenting adults do as long as no one is harmed. And that you may be offended by something is not harming you).
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 7:58pm@ Bruce …what is your definition of does no harm? When evidence supports that the best way to keep a civilized soty is a family (as identified as one man and one woman raising children) promotes financial prosperity, lower crime rates, a better civilization, I would say that deviations from that standard are harmful.
I look forward to your proof to substantiate your assertions.
I have looked, I can find no studies that support your position. There are countless ones to support my position. I’ll leave it to you to do your own research, as I have done mine – you will learn more that way
Report Post »sickoftalking
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 9:32pm@Bruce:
There are plenty of scientific studies that could be used to back up the idea that sexuality is not genetic. Animal test studies have shown, for instance, that same-sex intercourse versus male-female intercourse is much more frequent when there is overpopulation, or when the animals are removed from their natural environment.
Ultimately its not an issue that can be proven by data-driven studies. Even if some study were to show biology influenced sexuality, the next question is, how? People’s personalities evolve over their lifetimes; sexuality is just merely one component to personality; people are not born with concepts of what gender is in their head, or what sexual organs are; so any biological influences must work by influencing a persons psychological makeup. If that’s how the biological influences work, they really aren’t really genetic. They act just like any other environmental influence.
Its not clear that animals even have such a thing as “sexuality” as most people understand it, btw. Animals do sexual acts, but there isn’t a clear line between dominant-submissive social behavior and sexuality. There isn’t always in people either. That’s why sometimes, peoples sexuality changes.
At any rate, I‘m not sure why you’re so interested in insisting that people who insist its not genetic are ignorant — despite scientific proof — if you really have a “live and let live” point of view. There are plenty of people who believe its not genetic bu
Report Post »alienlogic
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 10:07pmBruce- God made two headed snakes and five legged frogs too, but that isn”t the template.
Report Post »Just like they aren“t ”right”, neither is homosexuality.
alienlogic
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 10:16pmSo God may make homosexuals that way? Well, God makes 2 headed snakes and 5 legged frogs also, but that isn’t the template. They are all freaks of nature.
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 6:07pmBruce – You should look at the demographics for the Western European countries and if you had a brain, you‘d see that the only group of people who are having children are the Muslims and they’re even less tolerant of homosexuals than fundamentalist Christians.
Report Post »ROMANS 10-9
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 11:04amONE
MAN
ONE
WOMAN!
Man shall not lay with man….
Fear God!
Report Post »wvernon1981
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:09pmWhy do you want to keep two people from being happy with each other?
Report Post »Bruce P.
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:26pmBecause a book put together 1700 years ago, full of the superstitions and fears of an even earlier era are far more important than two people being happy today.
Report Post »themachinist239
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:48pmONE MAN! ONE WOMAN! THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD STEP IN AND MAKE SURE IT STAYS THIS WAY EVEN THOUGH I PREACH THAT THE GOVERNMENT STAY OUT OF OUR LIVES. Wait a minute…
Report Post »Walkabout
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:01pmBruce P.
Because as soon as there is something like PreP with greater than 40% success rate, many like you will go barebacking & help drive drug resistant STD rates thru the roof.
Report Post »neocon1
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:08pm1981
they can be happy together,,,,they just cant be “married” to each other.
Report Post »a lie told a many times is still a lie.
Bruce P.
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:21pmWould you be happy if someone told you that you were not allowed to be married to your wife?
What rational (non-superstition-based) reason do you have for keeping two consenting adults from being married? How does it affect you?
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:43pmBruce – Marriage is NOT a civil right.
Report Post »Bruce P.
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:57pmAnd why isn’t it?
Why should it be a privilege?
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 4:06pmBruce – Apparently you haven’t read the Constitution. There is NO right to marriage under it. Why should sick deviant lifestyles be recognized as marriage?
Report Post »rememberyourkarma
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 7:52pmWhy are you so interested in what gay people do, anyway, Git-R-Done?
Studies have shown a strong correlation between homophobia and repressed homosexuality.
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 6:06pmRemember – Why do you care that other people don’t like homosexuals? Why should we be forced to be tolerant of your left wing special interest groups?
No surprise that you accuse anybody who doesn’t like homosexuals of being a homosexual yourself so that you can feel better about yourself.
Report Post »BuggiOlleo
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 10:42amI like Kagar already…is he running for President?
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 10:14amHere is what I see about the difference between homosexual sinners and the rest of us sinners, the rest of us don’t try to convince God and everybody else that our sin is not really a sin……
Report Post »Bruce P.
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:31pmDo you believe shaving or cutting your hair is an offense towards God?
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 4:00pmBruce – You must not have read the New Testament either where it condemns homosexuality. And Jesus himself said that marriage is between a man and a woman in Matthew 19:4-6 and Mark 10:6-8. I guess he’s a hateful bigot by your standards (which aren’t based on anything).
But you don‘t have any moral compass that’s based on anything. Only on meaningless secular humanism.
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 7:27pm@ Bruce…what is the point of your question? Let’s see, going against the will and directives of God is a sin. Homosexuality is a sin, other things are sins. Are you saying that I cut my hair and shave and am therefore sinning? Did you miss this part of my original post..” the difference between homosexual sinners and the rest of us sinners…”?
Are you saying that I am trying to convince someone that cutting hair or shaving is not a sin?
Are you saying that you actually know nothing about the culture and the meaning / significance of hair cutting and shaving at the time of Paul?
Are you implying that of the 613 laws of the Old Testament , that hair cutting and shaving are mentioned? Which of the following verses related to shaving trom the Torah are you refering to
Genesis 14:5
Genesis 14:17).
Genesis 14:16-18
Genesis 41:14
Genesis 41:13-15
Leviticus 13:33
Leviticus 13:32-34
Leviticus 14:8
Leviticus 14:7-9
Leviticus 14:9
Leviticus 14:8-10
Leviticus 21:5
Leviticus 21:4-6
Numbers 6:9
Numbers 6:8-10
Numbers 6:18.
Numbers 6:17-19
Numbers 6:19.
Numbers 6:18-20
Numbers 8:7.
Numbers 8:6-8
Deuteronomy 14:1
Deuteronomy 14:1-3
Deuteronomy 21:12
Deuteronomy 21:11-13
Are you perhaps confusing the Bible and the Koran?
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 8:14pmAnd which of the following verses related hair cutting are you refering to ?
Leviticus 19:27.
Report Post »Leviticus 19:26-28
Numbers 5:18.
Numbers 5:17-19
2 Samuel 14:26
2 Samuel 14:25-27
Jeremiah 7:29.
Jeremiah 7:28-30
Luke 7:44
Luke 7:43-45
Acts 18:18
1 Corinthians 11:6.
1 Corinthians 11:5-7
1 Corinthians 11:6
1 Corinthians 11:5-7
1 Corinthians 11:15
1 Corinthians 11
thibx
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 10:12amno fear of GOD in these people.
Report Post »Bruce P.
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:34pmWhat do you care?
If two homosexuals get married, is that going to somehow going to hurt you in the eyes of God? Or do you think that if we change laws down here that God will be forced to start letting them in Heaven?
In short, how does it affect you?
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:45pmBruce – It affects businesses that don‘t support same sex marriage who will be forced to provide benefits to married same sex couples and children will be taught that same sex marriage is normal and ok and don’t have to have parental consent.
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 7:52pm@ Bruce – well, since Marriage is an institution designed and created by God and since God defines marriage as the covenant union between one man and one woman what do you think the answer to your question / comment is?
Report Post »MarketsClear
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 9:48amInteresting headline. Calling people against marriage equality “pro-marriage” shows quite a bias. You could call them pro-traditional marriage, but both sides consider themselves pro-marriage. One side just wants to use the state to limit who may enter into the contract of marriage. I’m always amused that these are also the people who want to call themselves small government conservatives.
Report Post »Vladia
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 11:53am“I’m always amused that these are also the people who want to call themselves small government conservatives.”
*laugh* Excellent point. Kudos. :)
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:46pmThe pro same sex marriage people are NOT for smaller government. As a matter of fact, it would increase the size of government by forcing businesses to provide for same sex married couples and indoctrinate children on same sex marriage.
Report Post »mark
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 8:48am@FREEDOMPURVEOR
What about a three-legged homosexual rooster over obama?
Report Post »Q-960
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 8:31amI met this guy, he came to my college campus during the Michigan primaries. I think he’s a good guy, I wouldn’t vote for him, but I’d have a beer with him (no ****).
Report Post »Meyvn
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 8:25amI am sorry, but considering your lifestyle Mr. Karger, we would all be better off if you kept the gloves on.
Report Post »TruthisHealthy
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 8:35amYou are biggot.
Report Post »Meyvn
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 8:37amNah, I just think “Truth is Healthy”.
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 6:12pmROTFLMAO, nice one, Mevyn.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 8:19amI would vote for an opnely gay Republican…over Obama!
Report Post »LongRange
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 9:03pmI’d fote for a two headed pig over Obama Gonzo
Report Post »abbygirl1994
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:56amGays just gotta shove it down our throats!! I don’t care about your sexual preferences.. I don’t want to hear about your love life! And I certainly wouldn’t want you in any government calling. One gay guy destroyed the housing market and that was what started the ball rolling to where we are now! Lord help us!
Report Post »Vladia
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 11:51amAh, yes. Forget about all the straight people who have spent the last century actively working to destroy America (I’m speaking of progressives here- not ALL straight people. Not even a majority of straight people). Far better that we have them in office than refuse to vote for a gay just because he’s gay.
Report Post »Bruce P.
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:36pmIf you don‘t want other people’s love-lives shoved down your throat, then you best make sure to keep it to yourself.
As for that asinine “a gay guy destroyed the housing market” comment, the fact he was gay had nothing to do with it.
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:48pmBruce – Don’t get mad that normal find homosexuality to be disgusting. It’s also not hatred or bigotry that marriage has standards and you want to break those standards down.
And why do you care that two people of the same gender can’t marry each other? It’s not like homosexuality is illegal.
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 8:04pm@ Bruce – you must do better…“gay destroyed the housing market” is a reference to Barney Frank – flaming homosexual , who operated a homosexual brothel (via his boyfriend) in his basement…Surely you have heard of that?
If not, another s“tudy assignment” for you.
Perhaps that is why you have yet to answer any one?
Or are you just another drive by leftist who can’t defend his claims?
Report Post »Skeebee
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 2:17pmOh. They shove it down your throats? You people are so Ignorant it’s Laughable. You’re quite the hypocrite. Thanks for being a representative of majority of the people sharing your bigot views.
Report Post »If you don’t want homosexuality shoved down your throats, maybe you should keep your big mouths Shut and stop trying to shove your precious Book down everyone else’s throat.
Constructionist
Posted on April 12, 2012 at 11:27pmI’m taking the gloves off… and putting these fabulous mittens on!
Report Post »svan71
Posted on April 12, 2012 at 10:47pmSo hes a happy republican…. hes a **** too?
Report Post »VoteRightDammit
Posted on April 12, 2012 at 10:33pmGay sucks
This “look at me!” obsession has just worn SOOOOO thin.
Report Post »themachinist239
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:44pmI didn’t quite see in the article where Fred Karger called attention to his sexuality. I think you might be so offended by him simply being gay, that it consumes your attention rendering you incapable of focusing on anything the man has to say.
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:56pmThemachinist – The sick pervert Karger is trying to use somebody else’s faults to try to make himself look good. Excuse me if I’m not buying into it.
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 4:02pmThemachinist – Excuse me if the rest of us in society have standards and we’re not going to lower ourselves to your nihilistic view of the world.
Report Post »Skeebee
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 2:20pm@Git
Report Post »Really? I thought that’s what politicians were supposed to do. Foolish me.
Git-R-Done
Posted on April 12, 2012 at 9:53pmJust b/c somebody is divorced doesn‘t mean that I’m going to make it worse and support same sex marriage.
Report Post »spirited
Posted on April 12, 2012 at 9:37pmNow Fred, dont’ get into a rubbel.
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on April 12, 2012 at 9:36pm.
Report Post »Looks like Fred took it in the ear one to many times………..
NOT A CRAZY
Posted on April 12, 2012 at 9:26pmThis is spam and everyone needs to report it as such.
Report Post »blackyb
Posted on April 12, 2012 at 9:22pmYou are right, anyone who has to go to computer and advertise themselves like that needs a lot of money. That is wierd.
Report Post »NOT A CRAZY
Posted on April 12, 2012 at 9:21pmI don’t care about this article except to say this: I will never vote for ANYONE that I know is a homosexual. I know that Zero is a crack-smoking white-black homosexual and I didn’t vote for him either.
Report Post »Speak without Fear
Posted on April 12, 2012 at 9:40pmYour not the only! Nor would I.
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on April 12, 2012 at 10:19pmWhat if it were a homosexual Christian conservative who has taken a vow of celibacy because he thinks acting on homosexual feelings are a sin? Or, would you still hate him for what he is?
Would you vote for Obama over a homosexual?
Report Post »VoteRightDammit
Posted on April 12, 2012 at 10:38pmTo: Freedompurveyor
Your question is, of course, nonsensical since zero — Z E R O — homosexuals are capable of denying their compulsions and living a good life (’else they would not be gay).
However, since you brought up extremes, I think it good to make clear:
Gays have shown repeatedly they are incapable of placing their professional responsibilities above their gay activist desires. Examples abound, but for starters:
Bradley Manning
Judge Vaughn Walker
Fred Karger (whomever he is)
Thus, NO (as in zero) gay individuals can be entrusted with a position of responsibility and power over others’ lives.
Sad situation, since all of us know gay individuals who are decent people, bright, educated, kind. But, reality is what it is in the current gay political environment. Maybe in 20 years this will change, but for now not a single one can be trusted.
Report Post »VoteRightDammit
Posted on April 12, 2012 at 10:41pmps to FreedomPurveyor
“Would you vote for Obama over a homosexual?”
Perhaps you have not be paying attention, but Obama (and Rahm Emanual) hold lifetime memberships in Chicago’s “Man’s Country”, an upscale gay bathhouse. According to an individual who claims to have been one of Obama‘s ’men’, the President prefers older white males who service them on their knees (Obama is apparently not a catcher0.
Report Post »Freedom.Fighter
Posted on April 12, 2012 at 11:05pmHow judgmental can we get in here?? Come on, let’s not let the dems win! The Repubs can be just as superficial as the rest of ‘um.
Report Post »tommart22
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:23amVoterightdammit: There are “gay” people that control themselves, they just don’t happen to call themselves gay. There are people that deal with same sex attraction that get married to a person of the opposite sex more often than you think. they just aren’t open about it, if you’re not a liberal activist, why would you be?
Report Post »mark
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 8:41am@FREEDOMPURVEYOR
What about a three-legged homosexual rooster over obama?
Report Post »Bruce P.
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:50pmFunny how many people let their bigotry, hatred and irrational fears stop them from voting for someone they would otherwise agree with because of who they are in love with. “Sure, I agree with them on Constitutional questions, the economy, foreign policy but they are gay!” Ridiculous.
PS
@VOTERIGHTDAMMIT — I don’t say this lightly because ad hominems are not the foundation of a logical, rational argument but…you are an idiot. “Gays have shown repeatedly they are incapable of placing their professional responsibilities above their gay activist desires” You know how many heterosexual professionals that sentiment could describe as well, incapable of putting professional responsibilities over their person desires? But that’s okay, because those people are straight and therefore not scary.
Also, do you believe everything you read on the internet? Should I too? Because I read that you go to the same club as well.
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:49pmBruce – Keep whining bigotry all you want. You’re not going to suppress freedom of speech and freedom of religion any longer. Being a sick pervert is NOT a civil right.
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 10:48pm@ Bruce… there is no bigotry or hatred involved. God has made the determination as to what is acceptable and what is an abomination. It is He you have to convince rather than the rest of us. Let’s chat again after the rapture and the 2nd coming….every knee shall bow
You don’t beleive that…no problem, if you are right, I have lost nothing – you and I will not have the chance to say – see I told you so. However, If I am right and if by chance I get weary of praising and glorifying in the presence of God, you can look across the great divide and know I was correct – Luke 16:24
Report Post »blackyb
Posted on April 12, 2012 at 9:20pmWhat woman would do that? That is pathetic.
Report Post »blackyb
Posted on April 12, 2012 at 9:19pmThe devil is an accuser. That is all they do any more is accuse everyone, even for things they themselves do. Those gays usually go from one partner to the next. The world is catching afire with corruption and sin. All these people should be swept back under a rock. I am not fond of winnie chompers or rug munchers. They are all pervs.
Report Post »Keen-Site
Posted on April 12, 2012 at 10:04pmMy guess is that you don’t know any gay people do you? Your just making assumptions without any actual fact to back it up… and guess what, there are many straight people that go from one partner to the next as well.
Report Post »Bruce P.
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:40pmWould you include your bigotry and hatred as part of that sin and corruption?
“Winnie chompers” and “rug munchers”? Wouldn’t that include straight men and women too?
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:54pmApparently Keen and Bruce are self righteous hypocrites who complain about people being bigots against homosexuals but won’t complain about people being bigots against incest or polygamous relationships. Excuse me if not liking sexual deviants doesn’t make you hateful or a bigot.
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 4:18pmBruce – And what you consider to be hatred and bigotry isn‘t considered hatred or bigotry by God’s standards. Excuse me if the rest of us aren’t going to adopt your meaningless nihilistic secular humanistic view of the world.
Report Post »Tri-ox
Posted on April 12, 2012 at 9:02pmUh, who? – (AND) – Uh, who the hell cares?
Report Post »gooeylewie
Posted on April 12, 2012 at 8:52pmI’m sorry, Fred who?
Report Post »imsteph
Posted on April 12, 2012 at 8:45pmyawn…
Report Post »NOT A CRAZY
Posted on April 12, 2012 at 9:25pm@Bryan…I think you meant to say meant and not ment. I agree with you. I refuse to use the stolen happy word the homosexual’s stole. I actually prefer the english word for cigarette that The Blaze will not let me print.
Report Post »